Intraocular pressure in anaesthetized dogs given flumazenil with and without prior administration of midazolam

This study examined the effect of flumazenil, a benzodiazepine antagonist, on aqueous humour pressure in dogs receiving either midazolam or no benzodiazepine. Twenty-four halothane-anaesthetized dogs were assigned to one of four groups. Group I (n = 6) received saline iv at 0, 45 and 90 min. Group 2 (n = 6) received saline at 0 min, flumazenil 0.0025 mg.kg-1 iv at 45 min and flumazenil 0.16 mg.kg-1 at 90 min. Group 3 (n = 6) received midazolam 1.6 mg.kg-1 at 0 min followed by continuous iv infusion (1.25 mg.kg-1.hr-1). Flumazenil was given at 45 and 90 min as in Group 2. In Group 4 (n = 6) aqueous humour pressure was elevated to about 35 mmHg then midazolam and flumazenil were given as in Group 3. Aqueous humour pressure was determined using a 30-gauge needle placed into the anterior chamber. Saline or flumazenil produced no change in aqueous humour pressure in Groups 1 and 2. In Groups 3 and 4, midazolam decreased aqueous humour pressure from 18 +/- 2 mmHg (mean +/- SD) to 14 +/- 3 mmHg (P less than 0.001) and from 34 +/- 5 mmHg to 31 +/- 3 mmHg (P less than 0.01) respectively. Flumazenil given during continuous infusion of midazolam produced increases of aqueous humour pressure of 2 +/- 1 (P less than 0.01) to 5 +/- 2 mmHg (P less than 0.01) that lasted less than or equal to 12 min. It is concluded that at both normal and elevated aqueous humour pressures flumazenil produces statistically significant but clinically unimportant increases of aqueous humour pressure in anaesthetized dogs receiving midazolam, but not in dogs given no benzodiazepine.     

Randomized comparison of outcome after propofol-nitrous oxide or enflurane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia in operations of long duration

A randomized, prospective, comparative study was performed to evaluate induction characteristics, haemodynamic changes and recovery in 60 ASA I-II patients undergoing mainly gynaecological laparotomies with either propofol or thiopentone-enflurane anaesthesia. The propofol group (n = 30) received 2 mg.kg-1 propofol for induction of anaesthesia followed by propofol infusion. The thiopentone-enflurane group (n = 30) received thiopentone 4 mg.kg-1 for induction followed by enflurane (0.5-2 per cent). All patients received nitrous oxide (66 per cent] in oxygen begun one minute after tracheal intubation, and fentanyl (1.5 micrograms.kg-1) four minutes prior to induction. Other drugs administered during or after anaesthesia were similar among the groups. Haemodynamic measurements were similar between propofol and enflurane groups except after tracheal intubation when the mean arterial pressure was lower in the propofol group (P less than 0.05). The propofol group had significantly less (P less than 0.01) emesis in the recovery room than the enflurane group. The propofol group experienced significantly less (P less than 0.05) dizziness, depression/sadness and hunger than the enflurane group in the postoperative period as assessed with a visual analogue questionnaire. We conclude that propofol provided better outcome than enflurane in terms of these nonvital but annoying outcome measures after relatively long intra-abdominal operations.     

Succinylcholine does not worsen bupivacaine-induced cardiotoxicity in pentobarbital-anaesthetized dogs

The intravascular injection of a large dose of bupivacaine induces electrophysiological cardiac impairment, mainly by slowing ventricular conduction velocity, and haemodynamic depression, by a decrease in myocardial contractility. When cardiotoxicity occurs, succinylcholine rapidly stops convulsions. However, the possible interactions between bupivacaine and succinylcholine on cardiac electrophysiology and haemodynamic status have never been investigated. Thus, we used an experimental electrophysiological model involving closed-chest dogs. Three groups (n = 6) of pentobarbital-anaesthetized dogs were given 0.2 mg.kg-1 atropine iv. Dogs in Group 1 were given saline. The others received 4 mg.kg-1 bupivacaine iv over ten seconds. Dogs in Group 2 were then given saline and those in Group 3 were then given 2 mg.kg-1 succinylcholine iv from one to two minutes after the administration of bupivacaine. The following electrophysiological variables were measured: heart rate represented by RR interval (RR), PR, atria-His (AH), and His-ventricle (HV) intervals, QRS duration, and QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc). The following haemodynamic variables were measured: mean aortic pressure (MAoP), the peak of the first derivative of left ventricular pressure (LV dP/dt max), and LV end diastolic pressure (LVEDP). Comparison between Groups 1 and 2 showed that bupivacaine induced more than 100% HV interval lengthening and QRS widening (P less than 0.01), prolonged QTc interval by more than 25% (P less than 0.01), and decreased LV dP/dt max by more than 50% (P less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A defasciculating dose of d-tubocurarine causes resistance to succinylcholine

Forty-four patients, ASA physical status I or II, undergoing thiamylal, fentanyl, N2O/O2 anaesthesia were studied to determine the dose-response to succinylcholine (Sch) without prior defasciculation (24 pt - Group 1), or three minutes following d-tubocurarine (dTC), 0.043 mg.kg-1 (20 pt - Group 2). The individual log dose-logit response curve for each patient was determined using a cumulative dose plus infusion technique and integrated EMG monitoring of the first dorsal interosseous muscle. The mean (+/- SEM) ED50, ED90 and ED95 values for Sch in Group 1 were 0.13 +/- 0.01, 0.19 +/- 0.01 and 0.22 +- 0.01 mg.kg-1, and in Group 2 were 0.16 +/- 0.01, 0.25 +/- 0.01 and 0.29 +/- 0.02 mg.kg-1, respectively. The mean ED values in Group 2 were significantly greater than the equivalent values in Group 1 (P less than 0.05). Compared with values in Group 1, ED values in Group 2 represented mean increases of 23, 32, and 32 per cent, respectively. These pharmacodynamic data indicate that the dose of Sch needs to be increased by 32 per cent following a defasciculating dose of dTC 3 mg.70 kg-1 (0.043 mg.kg-1).     

Atropine-induced heart rate changes: a comparison between midazolam-fentanyl-propofol-N2O and midazolam-fentanyl-thiopentone-enflurane-N2O anaesthesia

Atropine-induced heart rate (HR) changes were studied in 19 patients (ASA physical status I) during anaesthesia maintained predominantly with propofol-N₂O or thiopentone-enflurane-N₂O. Ten patients (Group A) received midazolam (0.07 mg · kg^?1), fentanyl (1 μg · kg^?1), propofol (2 mg · kg^?1) and succinylcholine (1 mg · kg^?1). Following tracheal intubation, anaesthesia was maintained with propofol (6 mg · kg^?1 · hr^?1), N₂O (67 per cent) and O₂ (33 per cent). In nine patients (Group B) thiopentone (4 mg · kg^?1) was substituted for propofol and anaesthesia maintained with N₂O (67 per cent) O₂ (33 per cent), and enflurane (0.5 per cent inspired concentration). The study was non-randomised because Group B patients were only included if HR before administration of atropine < 90 beats · min^?1. IPPV was performed in all patients using a Manley ventilator (minute vol. 85 ml · kg^?1; tidal vol. 7 ml · kg^?1). Ten minutes after tracheal intubation, incremental doses of atropine (equivalent cumulative doses: 1.8, 3.6, 7.2, 14.4, 28.8 μg · kg^?1) were administered at two-minute intervals and HR responses calculated during the last 45 sec of each intervening period. No differences were observed between the groups following 1.8 and 3.6 μg · kg^?1 atropine, but propofol-N₂O anaesthesia was associated with reduced responses (P < 0.01) following 7.2, 14.4 and 28.8 μg · kg^?1 atropine. These results suggest that there is a predominance of parasympathetic influences during propofol-N₂O anaesthesia compared with thiopentone-enflurane-N₂O anaesthesia.     

Induction reflex actions with intravenous nalbuphine as an adjunct to isoflurane

Ninety unpremedicated patients undergoing mask anaesthesia were assigned to one of three groups according to the volatile anaesthetic and the acute intravenous premedication administered. Group I received saline placebo as premedication and halothane by inhalation. Group II received saline placebo and isoflurane by inhalation. Group III received nalbuphine 0.1 mg.kg-1 IV as premedication and isoflurance by inhalation. Mean time to loss of consciousness (71 sec) did not differ among groups. The dosage of thiopentone required to induce loss of consciousness was decreased by 15 per cent (from 3.9 to 3.3 mg.kg-1) by nalbuphine premedication (P less than 0.05), and time to induction of surgical anaesthesia using isoflurane was decreased by 15 per cent (P less than 0.05). The incidence of reflex actions (coughing, laryngospasm, breath holding, hiccoughs and movement) during induction was no different in the saline-premedicated halothane or isoflurane groups. Acute intravenous nalbuphine premedication decreased significantly the incidence of reflex actions during induction of isoflurane anaesthesia from 77 per cent to 37 per cent (P less than 0.02). Desaturation episodes (SaO2 less than 90 per cent) were more frequent with isoflurane inductions compared with halothane (55 per cent vs 17 per cent, P less than 0.01). Apnoeic episodes accounted for the majority of desaturations associated with nalbuphine premedication, while excitatory reflexes (coughing and laryngospasm) accounted for more desaturations with isoflurane alone.     

Lidocaïne en aérosol après l’amygdalectomie chez 1’enfant

Post-tonsillectomy analgesia was compared using ten per cent aerosol lidocaine or 1.5 mg.kg-1 intramuscular codeine. Thirty ASA physical status I or II children between two and ten years of age were assigned, in a random fashion, to one of two groups: Group A received codeine 1.5 mg.kg-1 intramuscularly, Group B received a total dose of 4 mg.kg-1 of ten per cent aerosol lidocaine on the tonsillar beds. For both groups, the treatment was administered at the end of the surgical procedure. The postoperative comfort state was assessed on a global scale using the following statement: (1) comfortable = 1, (2) agitation = 2, (3) uncontrollable = 3. Assessment of postoperative comfort was recorded after 20 min in the post-anaesthetic recovery room. Blood samples for lidocaine concentration estimation were obtained at 5, 7.5, 10, and 15 min after administration. Finally, the time of recovery was recorded. The immediate post-anaesthetic comfort observed with ten per cent aerosol lidocaine was statistically superior to that obtained with 1.5 mg.kg-1 intramuscular codeine. The maximal systemic lidocaine concentration which was 2.1 +/- 0.2 micrograms.ml-1 was well below the accepted toxic level of 5.3 micrograms.ml-1. The recovery room times were not statistically different between the two groups. In conclusion, 4 mg.kg-1 of ten per cent aerosol lidocaine applied directly on the tonsillar beds was shown a superior immediate post-tonsillectomy analgesic technique.     

Oral midazolam premedication for children with congenital cyanotic heart disease under-going cardiac surgery: a comparative study

To determine whether oral midazolam is a safe and effective alternative to our current standard premedication for children with cyanotic congenital heart disease (CCHD), 30 children aged 1–6 yr, scheduled for elective cardiac surgery, were studied. The children were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group I received oral midazolam 0.75 mg · kg^{? 1} 30 min before separation from their parents in the surgical waiting area, and Group II received oral or rectal pentobarbitone 2 mg · kg^{? 1} at 90 min, and morphine 0.2 mg· kg^{? 1} and atropine 0.02 mg· kg^{? 1} im at 60 min before separation. Heart rate, haemoglobin oxygen saturation (SpO₂) and anxiolysis and sedation scores were recorded at four times during the study: at baseline (immediately before premedication), immediately after administration of the premedication, at separation of children from parents in the waiting area and at the time of application of the face mask in the operating room. We found that in Group I, anxiolysis improved at separation from parents compared with baseline (P < 0.05) and sedation increased both at separation and on mask application (P < 0.05), whereas in Group II anxiolysis did not change at any time and sedation increased only at separation (P < 0.05). Intramuscular injection of morphine produced a transient decrease in mean SpO₂ (from 84% to 76%) (P < 0.05) that did not occur after ingestion of oral midazolam. The results of this study indicate that oral midazolam is a safe and effective replacement for the standard premedication for children with CCHD undergoing cardiac surgery and avoids the decrease in SpO₂ associated with im injections.     

A comparative study of patient-controlled epidural fentanyl and single dose epidural morphine for post-caesarean analgesia

In a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study, 23 patients who had undergone Caesarean delivery under epidural anaesthesia were assessed to evaluate the effectiveness of patientcontrolled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with fentanyl compared with a single dose of epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia. Group A (n = 11) received epidural fentanyl 100 μg intraoperatively, then self-administered a maximum of two epidural fentanyl boluses 50 μg (10 μg · ml^?1) with a lockout period of five minutes for a maximum of two doses per hour. Group B (n = 11) received a single bolus of epidural morphine 3 mg (0.5 mg · ml^?1) intraoperatively and received the same instructions as Group A but had their PCA devices filled with 0.9% NaCl. Patients were assessed up to 24 hr for pain, satisfaction with pain relief, nausea and pruritus using visual analogue scales (VAS). The treatments for inadequate analgesia, nausea and pruritus as well as time to first independent ambulation were recorded. The ventilatory response to carbon dioxide challenge was measured at four and eight hours. Pain relief, satisfaction with pain relief, and the use of supplemental analgesics were similar in both groups. The mean 24 hr dose of epidural fentanyl used by group A patients was 680 μg. Pruritus was less common in Group A patients at the 8 and 24 hr observation periods (P < 0.0125). Both groups experienced the same degree of nausea and clinically unimportant respiratory depression. We conclude that PCEA with fentanyl provides analgesia equal to a single dose of epidural morphine and may be suitable for patients who have experienced considerable pruritus after epidural morphine adminstration.     

A comparison of morphine-perphenazine and midazolam on preoperative sedation and arterial oxygen saturation

The effectiveness of midazolam and a mixture of morphine-perphenazine premedication to produce sedation and their effects on preoperative oxygen saturation (SaO2) were examined. Eighty-five patients whose SaO2 measured with a pulse oximeter was greater than 90% and who were not receiving narcotic sedatives or oxygen were randomized to three groups. Each patient had his SaO2 recorded before premedication with placebo (saline), midazolam 0.08 mg.kg-1 or morphine 0.15 mg.kg-1 with perphenazine 2.5-5.0 mg im. From 30-90 min later, prior to anaesthesia SaO2 was repeated, and a sedation score was obtained by a blinded observer using a seven point scale. Median sedation scores were greater for midazolam (4) than for morphine-perphenazine (2) and placebo (1) (P less than 0.0001). As well, there was a decrease in the SaO2 in the morphine-perphenazine group (1.7 +/- 2.7%, P less than 0.001) but not in the midazolam and placebo groups (0.1 +/- 2.3%, -0.8 +/- 2.1%). In conclusion midazolam produced greater sedation than morphine-perphenazine and placebo without effect on SaO2 whereas morphine-perphenazine showed a decrease in SaO2 preoperatively.     

Side effects of nalbuphine while reversing opioid-induced respiratory depression: report of four cases

Nalbuphine hydrochloride, an agonist-antagonist opioid, is reported to reverse the respiratory depression of moderate doses of fentanyl (20 micrograms.kg-1) and still provide good analgesia. We report four patients having abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in which we attempted to reverse the respiratory depression of large doses of fentanyl (50-75 micrograms.kg-1) with nalbuphine (0.3 mg.kg-1, 0.1 mg.kg-1 or 0.05 mg.kg-1). Nalbuphine reversed respiratory depression in all four patients and the respiratory rate increased from 10 to 23 breaths per minute, end-tidal CO2 decreased from 7.0 +/- 0.3 per cent to 5.6 +/- 0.7 per cent, and peak inspiratory pressure after 0.1 seconds increased from 4 +/- 1.4 to 13 +/- 2.6 mmHg. However, hypertension, increased heart rate, and significant increase in analogue pain scores accompanied reversal of respiratory depression. Agitation, nausea, vomiting, and cardiac dysrhythmias also were observed frequently. We do not recommend the use of nalbuphine to facilitate early extubation of the trachea after large doses of fentanyl for abdominal aortic surgery.     

A comparison of fentanyl,esmolol, and their combination for blunting the haemodynamic responses during rapid-sequence induction

The purpose of this randomized, double-blind study was to compare the ability of a combination of fentanyl and esmolol to blunt the haemodynamic effects of intubation with that of either agent alone. Patients received fentanyl or saline four minutes before, and esmolol or saline two minutes before rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia. The F2 group (n = 24) received fentanyl 2 micrograms.kg-1, the E2 group (n = 24) received esmolol 2 mg.kg-1, the F2/E2 group (n = 25) received a combination of fentanyl 2 micrograms.kg-1 and esmolol 2 mg.kg-1, and the F5 group (n = 26) received fentanyl 5 micrograms.kg-1. Following tracheal intubation, the maximum percent change from baseline heart rate was less in the F2/E2 and F5 groups (12% and 16% respectively) than in the E2 group (34%)(P < 0.05). The maximum percent changes from baseline systolic blood pressure in the F2/E2 and F5 groups (15% and 6% respectively) were less than in the F2 and E2 groups (24% and 33% respectively) (P < 0.05). The combination of a low dose of fentanyl and esmolol provides an alternative to a higher dose of fentanyl for blunting the haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation during rapid-sequence induction in healthy patients.     

Neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of mivacurium chloride in surgical patients receiving nitrous oxide-narcotic or nitrous oxide-isoflurane anaesthesia

The neuromuscular and cardiovascular effects of mivacurium chloride were studied during nitrous oxide-oxygen narcotic (fentanyl) (n = 90) and nitrous oxide-oxygen isoflurane (ISO) anaesthesia (n = 45). In addition, a separate group (n = 9) received succinylcholine during fentanyl anaesthesia to compare its neuromuscular effects with mivacurium. Mivacurium was initially administered as a single bolus in doses from 0.03 mg.kg-1 to 0.25 mg.kg-1 to study the dose-response relationships, as well as the cardiovascular effects of mivacurium. Neuromuscular block (NMB) was measured by recording the twitch response of the adductor pollicis muscle following ulnar nerve stimulation (0.15 Hz, 0.2 ms supramaximal voltage). The ED95 values for mivacurium were estimated to be 0.073 mg.kg-1 and 0.053 mg.kg-1 in the fentanyl and ISO groups respectively. The duration of block (time from injection to 95 per cent recovery) for a dose of 0.05 mg.kg-1 mivacurium was 15.3 +/- 1.0 min and 21.5 +/- 1.3 min for fentanyl and ISO anaesthesia, respectively. The recovery index (25-75 per cent) between initial bolus dose (6.1 +/- 0.5 min), repeat bolus doses (7.6 +/- 0.6 min), mivacurium infusion (6.7 +/- 0.7 min) and succinylcholine infusion (6.8 +/- 1.8 min) were not significantly different. There was minimal change in mean arterial pressure (MAP) or heart rate (HR) following bolus doses of mivacurium up to 0.15 mg.kg-1. Bolus administration of 0.20 mg.kg-1 or 0.25 mg.kg-1 of mivacurium decreased MAP from 78.2 +/- 2.5 to 64.0 +/- 3.2 mmHg (range 12-59 per cent of control) (P less than 0.05). The same doses when administered slowly over 30 sec produced minimal change in MAP or HR.     

Low-dose sufentanil in major surgery

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of sufentanil 1 micrograms.kg-1 during N2O-O2 and intermittent isoflurane anaesthesia in major non-cardiac surgery. Thirty-one patients (18 females, 13 males; mean age 47 yr), undergoing cholecystectomy received a 1 microgram.kg-1 bolus of sufentanil before the induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone. On average, three sufentanil increments were administered, to a total (bolus + maintenance) dose of 1.5 micrograms.kg-1. Cardiovascular stability was not achieved in eleven patients who then were given isoflurane. The arterial pressure decreased after sufentanil (P less than 0.05), reaching a nadir (mean 108/65 mmHg, heart rate 63 bpm) at one minute post-incision. Clinically important hypertension or hypotension did not occur in any patient. One patient, receiving beta-blocker therapy, required atropine to control bradycardia. Postoperative respiratory depression did not occur in patients who received less than one micrograms.kg-1.hr-1 with the last increment being given more than 20 minutes before the end of anaesthesia. Slight respiratory depression in the recovery room was reported in one patient, who had received a total of 1.3 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1 of sufentanil, and the last sufentanil increment 24 min before the end of surgery. The most frequently reported side-effects were nausea (35 per cent) and vomiting (23 per cent). Induction, maintenance and recovery from anaesthesia were rated as "good" in 87, 87, and 74 per cent of the cases, respectively, and "satisfactory" in the remainder. We conclude that this technique is valuable to assure good protection of the cardiovascular system without undue respiratory depression during recovery.     

Prophylactic lidocaine for postoperative coronary artery bypass patients,a double-blind,randomized trial

This double-blind controlled study examined the frequency of ventricular arrhythmias (premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) greater than 5.min-1, bigeminy, couplets, ventricular tachycardia, and ventricular fibrillation) in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients during the first 24 hr postoperatively to determine the effect of prophylactic lidocaine on reducing the frequency of ventricular arrhythmias. Patients were included in the study if they had undergone CABG only, and had not received treatment for ventricular arrhythmias before coming off cardiopulmonary bypass. A total of 83 patients were studied and were randomly allocated to 43 in the placebo control group and 40 in the lidocaine-treated group. The results showed that 67 per cent of patients in the placebo group and 33 per cent of patients in the lidocaine treated group had ventricular arrhythmias (P less than 0.005). There was also a significant reduction in ventricular fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia in the lidocaine treated group (P less than 0.01). It is recommended that a routine infusion of lidocaine, 100 mg bolus followed by 2 mg.kg-1, be given to every postoperative coronary artery bypass patient for at least the first 24 hours.     

Premedication of children with oral midazolam

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the safety, efficacy and feasibility of oral midazolam premedication in children were evaluated in an ambulatory surgery unit. Eighty unmedicated children (ASA PS I or II, ages 1-6 yr) were randomly assigned to one of four groups receiving midazolam 0.5, 0.75, or 1.0 mg.kg-1 or a placebo 30 min before separation from parents. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, sedation and anxiolysis scores were recorded before premedication, every five minutes for 30 min and then during induction of anaesthesia and recovery. We found that heart rate, systolic blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation and respiratory rate were unchanged during the study. Sedation and anxiolysis scores in the midazolam-treated groups were greater than those in the placebo group and that anxiolysis at the time of separation from the parents was judged excellent in 80-90% of the children who received midazolam. However, sedation and anxiolysis did not differ among the three midazolam groups. Mean times to discharge from hospital were similar for all four groups. The side effects, loss of balance and head control, blurred vision and dysphoric reactions were observed only in the 0.75 and 1.0 mg.kg-1 midazolam groups. We conclude that oral midazolam 0.5 mg.kg-1 is a safe and effective premedication and that 0.75 and 1 mg.kg-1 while offering no additional benefit, may cause more side effects.     

Analgesic efficacy and safety of a caudal bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture in children

The analgesic efficacy and safety of a single caudal injection of a bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture was investigated in this prospective, controlled, triple-blinded study of 34 children, aged 1-11 yr and of ASA physical status I-II undergoing urological surgery. After induction of anaesthesia and before surgery, the children were randomly assigned to receive a caudal injection of 1.0 ml.kg-1 bupivacaine 0.125% with epinephrine 1:400,000 and either fentanyl 1.0 microgram.kg-1 in 1.0 ml of normal saline or 1.0 ml of normal saline. After completion of surgery, patients were assessed in the recovery room for six hours from the time of the caudal injection and for a further 18 hr on the ward. While in the recovery room arterial oxygen saturation and respiratory rate were monitored continuously and recorded hourly together with end-tidal carbon dioxide, pain and sedation scores. Other complications were also recorded. While on the ward, pain and sedation scores, respiratory rate and side effects were recorded every two hours. Postoperative analgesia was provided by intravenous morphine. Analgesic requirements were recorded for the 24-hr study period. Pain and sedation scores did not differ between groups. Respiratory depression or hypoxia did not occur. The incidences of other side effects did not differ. There were no differences in the numbers of patients requiring morphine within eight hours, the time to first morphine administration or the total morphine requirements. We conclude that a single caudal injection of a bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture with epinephrine administered prior to surgery, while safe, offers no advantage over an injection of bupivacaine 0.125% with epinephrine for paediatric urological surgery.     

Prophylactic oral ephedrine reduces the incidence of hypotension after subarachnoid block

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of oral ephedrine in preventing hypotension following subarachnoid block. Two hundred women, ASA physical status I or II, undergoing lower abdominal surgery were randomly divided into two groups (n = 100 each). All patients were given routine oral premedication consisting of diazepam 10 mg and ranitidine 150 mg at bed time and at 90 min before surgery. In addition, Group I patients received ephedrine 30 mg, orally, 30 min before subarachnoid block was administered. Group II received only routine premedication. After starting an iv line and preloading with 10 ml · kg^?1 crystalloid, patients were given 0.5% heavy bupivacaine 3.2 to 3.6 ml, depending on body weight, intrathecally. Patients with decreases in blood pressure of 20% were given ephedrine iv, in increments, in addition to crystalloids. Despite a similar level of block (T₃–T₄) and iv fluids, the total dose of ephedrine supplement in Group I was 4.3 ± 4.8 mg compared with 11.6 ± 9.4 mg in Group II (P < 0.01). Also, 55 patients in Group I required intraoperative inotrope supplement compared with 83 in Group II (P < 0.01). We conclude that oral ephedrine premedication is a simple and effective way of reducing the incidence of hypotension in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery under subarachnoid block.     

Interactions of preoperative erythromycin administration with general anaesthesia

Previous reports have demonstrated a gastric emptying effect of erythromycin due to a motilin-like mechanism. We studied 50 patients, scheduled for daycase laparoscopy, randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group P patients received 30 min before induction of anaesthesia, in a double-blind manner an infusion of 250 ml dextrose 5% while patients in Group E (n = 25) received 500 mg of erythromycin diluted in 250 ml dextrose 5%. An orogastric tube was inserted to measure both gastric pH using a pHmeter and residual gastric volume (RG V) using the phenol red dilutional technique. Six patients were excluded for surgical reasons. More patients in Group P (6/22) than in Group E (0/22) had RGV > 25 ml and more patients in Group P (17/22) presented with a gastric pH < 2.5 than in Group E (5/22), P < 0.05. Since coma and respiratory depression have been reported recently after midazolam and alfentanil administration in patients having received erythromycin, recovery conditions were assessed and were found to be comparable between groups. In conclusion, the administration of iv erythromycin before outpatient laparoscopy decreased residual gastric volume and increased gastric pH without affecting recovery from general anaesthesia.     

Clinical and pharmacokinetic aspects of the combination of meperidine and prilocaine for spinal anaesthesia

The aim of this study was to determine whether the addition of a small dose of prilocaine could augment the spinal block induced by meperidine and affect intrathecal meperidine pharmacokinetic behaviour. Spinal anaesthesia was performed in 60 men scheduled for endoscopic resection of a prostatic adenoma or bladder tumour under spinal anaesthesia. They were allocated randomly to receive either 1 mg.kg-1 meperidine (Group 1, n = 30), or 1 mg.kg-1 meperidine plus 0.5 mg.kg-1 prilocaine (Group 2, n = 30). Blood samples were collected prior to and for 24 hr after spinal injection in 24 patients (12 in each group). Plasma meperidine levels were assayed by gas chromatography. Complete motor block was achieved in all Group 2 patients, but was incomplete in seven of Group 1 (P less than 0.05). The onset of both motor and sensory blocks was shorter (P less than 0.01) in Group 2 and the duration was longer (P less than 0.05). Coadministration of prilocaine modifies meperidine pharmacokinetic behaviour. The area under curve was 48% greater (P less than 0.01) and Cmax was higher in Group 2 than in Group 1, 145.8 +/- 42.2 vs 107 +/- 20.5 ng.ml-1 (P less than 0.001). No evidence of respiratory depression was noted in any of the patients. Despite the increase in plasma meperidine concentrations, no side effects were observed. The plasma concentrations remained at one third to one sixth the levels reported to induce a respiratory depression. It is concluded that the addition of prilocaine to meperidine improves motor and sensory block during surgery and alters meperidine kinetics without producing major side effects.