经尿道前列腺电切与双极等离子电切对前列腺电切术后尿道狭窄的影响

目的研究经尿道前列腺电切术（TURP）和双极等离子电切术（PKRP）治疗前列腺增生（BPH）与术后尿道狭窄的关系。方法对59例接受TURP患者,36例接受PKRP患者的临床资料进行回顾性研究,分析手术时间、术后冲洗时间、留置尿管时间、术后住院时间、术后6个月尿常规白细胞数等指标与相应的尿道狭窄发生率的关系。结果术前两组一般情况比较无统计学差异（P〉0.05）;手术时间、术后冲洗时间、留置尿管时间、术后住院时间、术后6个月尿常规白细胞数,PKRP组明显优于TURP组（P〈0.05）。术后6个月中,TURP组有10例发生尿道狭窄（16.9%）,而PKRP组则仅为1例（2.8%）（P〈0.05）。Logistic回归分析,TURP组术后留置尿管时间是影响尿道狭窄的主要危险因素,PKRP组各指标对尿道狭窄的发生无明显差异。结论 TURP术后留置尿管时间是导致尿道狭窄的主要因素。PKRP术后尿道狭窄发生率明显低于TURP,有良好的应用前景。     

经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术与普通电切术中失血量比较

目的比较经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术与普通电切术中失血量。方法自2007年10月至2008年3月,收治的30例BPH患者行经尿道等离子双极电切（PKRP）;自2008年4月至7月,收治的30例BPH患者行普通电切（TURP）。分析这60例患者的临床资料。PKRP组年龄（74．2±7．0）岁,前列腺体积（49．3±33．1）ml;TURP组年龄（73．2±7．2）岁,前列腺体积（51．1±23．2）ml。收集术中所有冲洗液,测冲洗液体积,混匀后精确测血红蛋白浓度。结果PKRP组手术时间（111．3±42．5）min,切除前列腺组织重量（20．1±14．3）g,失血量（86．3±79．9）ml,每克前列腺组织平均失血量（3．7±1．9）ml／g;TURP组手术时间（108．0±42．2）min,切除前列腺组织重量（23．6±13．1）g,失血量（201．8±178．7）ml,每克前列腺组织平均失血量（8．3±6．1）ml／g。PKRP组和TURP组手术时间及切除前列腺组织重量差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。PKRP组术中失血量少于TURP组（P〈0．01）。PKRP组每克前列腺组织平均失血量少于TURP组（P〈0．01）。结论经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术中失血量少于普通电协。     

经尿道等离子双极电切术与传统电切术治疗重度前列腺增生症的比较

目的比较经尿道等离子双极电切术(PKRP)与传统经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP TUVP)对重度前列腺增生症的治疗效果。方法采用PKRP术与TURP TUVP术治疗重度前列腺增生症各32例进行比较。结果两种方法的手术时间、术后IPSS减分率及尿流率改善差异无显著性(P>0.05);但与TURP TUVP术相比,PKRP术术中出血量更少,术中术后无低钠血症及水中毒发生,被膜损伤少而轻。结论PKRP术具有止血好、安全度大、对机体生理功能影响小、并发症少、易掌握等优点,在治疗重度前列腺增生症时更为突出。     

经尿道等离子双极电切术治疗前列腺增生症的体会

我院于2003年4月～2004年5月对58例前列腺增生症（BPH）患,采用经尿道等离子双极电切术治疗,疗效满意,现总结报告如下.     

经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术治疗良性前列腺增生症临床价值研究

目的 分析经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术(TUPKP)治疗良性前列腺增生症患者(BPH)的临床价值.方法 回顾性分析2019-01—2020-06在通许县人民医院接受手术治疗的78例BPH患者的临床资料.根据不同术式分为TUPKP组和经尿道前列腺电切术组(TURP组),各39例.对2组患者的基线资料、围术期指标进行比较;...     

经尿道等离子体双极电切术治疗前列腺增生症

2002年6月～2004年2月,我们采用经尿道等离子体双极电切(TUPKVP)系统行前列腺切除260例,疗效满意,现报告分析如下。     

经尿道等离子体双极电切术治疗前列腺增生

目的：探讨经尿道等离子体双极电切术治疗良性前列腺增生的安全性和疗效。方法：回顾性分析经尿道等离子体双极电切治疗前列腺增生100例患者临床资料。结果：术中出血少．无前列腺电切综合征,术后随访3～6个月,最大尿流率由术前8．2ml／s升到术后19．5ml／s,国际前列腺症状评分由术前25分降到9分,剩余尿由56ml减至10.8ml,无尿失禁。结论：经尿道等离子体前列腺切除术具有安全性高、并发症少、疗效好的优点。     

经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切和经尿道前列腺电切治疗良性前列腺增生的临床结果比较

目的比较经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术(PKRP)与经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的临床疗效及安全性。方法PKRP组78例,TURP组78例,比较2组手术时间、术中出血量,术后国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量评分(QOL)、最大尿流率(Qmax)及并发症发生率。结果PKRP组手术时间、术中出血量、术后2个月内暂时性尿失禁发生率、术后4周内继发性出血及3个月内尿道狭窄发生率分别为(64±21)min,(247±84)ml,26．9％(21／78),1．3％(1／78)和2．6％(2／78),TURP组分别为(78±18)min,(432±132)ml,48．7％(38／78),10．3％(8／78)和12．8％(10／78),2组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0．05)。2组均未发生电切综合征(TURS)。PKRP组术后IPSS为4．6±1．2,QOL为1．1±0．8,Qmax为(26．1±4．6)ml／s; TURP组分别为4．8 4±1．1、1．3±0．8、(25．3．4±4．2)ml／s;均较术前明显改善(P<0．01),但组间差异无统计学意义。结论PKRP与TURP比较,治疗BPH疗效相近,但安全性更好,是治疗BPH的理想方法。     

经尿道等离子双极电切术与传统单极电切术治疗前列腺增生症比较的Meta分析

目的比较经尿道等离子双极电切术(B-TURP)与传统单极电切术(M-TURP)两种术式治疗良性前列腺增生症的安全性和有效性。方法计算机检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、Web of Science及CNKI电子数据库,查找所有比较B-TURP和M-TURP治疗良性前列腺增生症的随机对照试验(RCT),同时手检纳入文献的参考文献。按纳入排除标准由2人独立进行RCT的筛选、资料提取和质量评价后,采用RevMan 5.0软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入6个研究,718例患者。Meta分析结果显示:1安全性方面:与M-TURP相比,B-TURP后血钠(MD:-3.96,95%CI:-6.70,-1.22,P0.05)及血红蛋白(MD:-0.48,95%CI:-0.58,-0.38,P0.000 01)下降值较低;发生TURS的患者较少(B-TURP组0例,M-TURP组3例);尿道狭窄、尿潴留、尿失禁等并发症的发生率差异无统计学意义。2有效性方面:国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量评分(QOL)、最大尿流率(Qmax)、残余尿(PVR)、手术时长及术中切除前列腺组织重量的差异均无统计学意义。结论与M-TURP术相比,B-TURP具有相似的有效性和更高的安全性。     

经尿道双极等离子电切术治疗良性前列腺增生效果观察

目的比较经尿道前列腺双极等离子电切术(TPKR)及经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的效果。方法随机将130例BPH患者分为2组,每组65例。对照组给予TURP,观察组实施TPKR。比较分析2组治疗效果。结果观察组手术时间和术中出血量及术后并发症均少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。术后膀胱冲洗时间、留置尿管时间及住院时间,2组差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。术后2组患者IPSS、QOL和Qmax改善程度均优于术前,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),但组间比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 TURP和TPKR治疗BPH均有良好的治疗效果,但TPKR出血量少及并发症发生率低。     

Comparison of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate with standard transurethral prostatectomy: shorter stay, earlier catheter removal and fewer complications

Authors from Detroit assess the use of the bipolar TURP against the monopolar technique; there were relatively few patients, reflecting the decreasing requirement for TURP in the USA. In addition, the amount of resected tissue was not particularly large, almost certainly a reflection of the decreasing size of resected prostatic tissue in that country. They found the bipolar TURP to have many advantages over standard monopolar TURP, and these are described. Acute urinary retention is a common urological emergency, and authors from London found that it had a measurable impact on the health-related quality of life of patients who develop this problem. They describe particularly how painful a condition it is, and that it had a significant economic burden. OBJECTIVE: To assess bipolar transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) using the Gyrus system (Gyrus Medical, Maple Grove, MD) compared with a standard monopolar TURP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All 43 patients undergoing TURP from November 2000 to August 2002 were reviewed retrospectively; the 1.5-year observation period allowed for the detection of late complications. In all, 18 consecutive patients had standard and 25 had bipolar TURP. RESULTS: The resection was 18 g for standard and 15 g for the Gyrus TURP (part of the Gyrus chips are vaporized during resection). The Foley catheter was removed sooner (1.8 vs 3.2 days) and the hospital stay was less in the Gyrus group (1.2 vs 2.1 days). Acute complications occurred in a third of the standard group and four (16%) of the Gyrus group. Long-term complications were comparable, at two each in the standard and Gyrus groups. Four patients (15%) with small glands went home on the day of surgery, needing no bladder irrigation after Gyrus TURP. CONCLUSION: Few innovations in TURP technique have been described in the past few decades but comparing Gyrus to standard TURP showed that the former allows earlier removal of the urinary catheter and earlier discharge from hospital, while decreasing complications. The Gyrus system also has other benefits; it allows coagulation of tissue during resection, resulting in excellent intraoperative visualization, and normal saline is used as the irrigant fluid, reducing the potential for TUR syndrome. The shorter stay after Gyrus TURP can result in cost savings of up to $1200/patient/day at our institution.     

三种经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效比较

目的比较良性前列腺增生（BPH）的三种经尿道手术治疗效果。方法分别采用经尿道前列腺电切术（TURP）、经尿道双极等离子前列腺切除术（PKRP）和经尿道铥激光前列腺切除术（TmLRP）治疗BPH共137例。结果三种术式患者手术前后前列腺症状评分（IPSS）、生活质量评分（QOLs）、残余尿（RUV）、最大尿流率（Qmax）比较均得到显著改善（P〈0．01），疗效满意。前列腺重量（PW）〈40g时，TmLRP组手术时间明显短于PKRP和TURP组（P〈0．01）。PW〉50g时，TmLRP组手术时间明显长于PKRP和TURP组（P〈0．01）。TmLRP和PKRP组术中出血少，术后膀胱冲洗时间、留管时间及住院时间均短于TURP组（P〈0．01）。站论三种经尿道手术方法均是治疗BPH的有效手段，TmLRP和PKRP比TURP更安全，术中及术后并发症更少。     

Incidence of inguinal hernia after prostate surgery: Open radical retropubic prostatectomy versus open simple prostatectomy versus transurethral resection of the prostate

Our objective was to determine the incidence of inguinal hernia (IH) after surgery for prostatic diseases. Medical records of 395 patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP; n  = 155), open simple prostatectomy (OP; n  = 35), or transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP; n  = 205) at the Chibaken Saiseikai Narashino Hospital from April 2000 to March 2007 were retrospectively evaluated. The incidence of IH was 23.9% in the RRP group, 18.9% in the OP group, and 2% in the TURP group. Overall, 91.9% in the RRP and 83.3% in the OP group developed an IH within 2 years postoperatively. The laterality of IH after open surgery was mainly on the right side. Subclinical IH were seen in 25% of RRP cases. The existence of subclinical IH was the only significant risk factor for postoperative IH in this analysis. Furthermore, OP and RRP procedures significantly increased the risk of postoperative IH compared with TURP. The hernia-free ratios were significantly lower after RRP and OP than after TURP ( vs RRP: P  < 0.001; vs OP: P  < 0.001). Our findings confirm that a lower abdominal incision itself is associated with postoperative IH in patients undergoing prostate surgery. Attention must be paid to pre-existing subclinical IH through careful preoperative assessment. Patients should be followed for more than 2 years due to the high incidence of postoperative IH.     

经尿道等离子前列腺汽化电切术与经尿道前列腺电切术的近期疗效比较

目的比较经尿道等离子前列腺汽化电切术（TUPKRP）与经尿道前列腺电切术（TURP）的近期疗效。方法将前列腺增生（benign prostatic hyperplasia，BPH）患者随机分为两组，分别行TUPKRP和TURP，比较两组术前和术后6个月检查的各项指标并进行统计学分析。结果术前两组一般情况比较无统计学意义（P〉0．05）；术后6个月两组国际前列腺症状评分、生活质量评分、最大尿流率比术前均得到明显改善（P〈0．01）；术中输血量、电切综合征发生率、术后平均膀胱冲洗时间、置管时间和住院时间，TUPKRP组明显小于TURP组（P〈0．01）。结论TUPKRP治疗BPH具有与TURP近期疗效相似；术中并发症发生率及患者术后恢复时间明显少于TURP，有良好的应用前景。     

剥离式经尿道前列腺切除术与经尿道前列腺电切术治疗良性前列腺增生的比较研究

目的:比较经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)与使用专用前列腺增生腺体剥离器行剥离式经尿道前列腺切除术(剥离式TURP,TUERP)治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的疗效与安全性。方法:BPH患者630例,均具备手术指征,随机分为TURP组(305例)和剥离式TURP组(325例)。术前两组年龄、前列腺体积、国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、最大尿流率(Qmax)数值比较,差异无统计学意义(P均0.05)。记录两组手术时间、手术切除率、术后需要持续膀胱冲洗时间、术后生活质量评分(QOL)、手术并发症数据,进行统计学分析。结果:手术后的资料分析显示,TUERP手术切除率优于TURP组的手术切除率[(60.1±12.3)%vs(47.0±13.3)%,P0.05)];TUERP组平均手术时间比TURP组短[(40.4±14.2)min vs(57.9±15.9)min,P0.05];术后冲洗时间较短[(2.2±1.1)d vs(2.7±0.6)d,P0.05]。TUERP组手术前后血清Na+和血红蛋白浓度变化无统计学意义,TURP组血清Na+和血红蛋白浓度变化有统计学意义[血Na+:(141.2±3.5)mmol/L vs(136.9±4.7)mmol/L,P0.01,血红蛋白:(137.6±8.8)g/L vs(124.8±9.6)g/L,P0.01]。术后3个月,两组的IPSS评分、QOL评分、Qmax评分均较术前有显著改善(P均0.01),组间比较无显著性差异。(P0.05)。结论:剥离式TURP治疗BPH和TURP比较,具有手术时间短、手术切除率高、术中出血少、术后恢复快、并发症少等优点,在临床上有良好的应用前景。     

经尿道等离子前列腺分离电切术和传统电切术治疗BPH的疗效比较

目的:比较经尿道等离子前列腺分离电切术和等离子刀经尿道传统电切术治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的临床疗效,并对分离电切术进行研究。方法:2005年9月至2010年8月,收集81例BPH患者,随机分为2组。单盲法,行经尿道等离子前列腺分离电切术40例,行等离子刀经尿道传统电切术41例;比较2组年龄、术前超声测量前列腺体积、手术中切除腺体重量、手术时间、术中出血、术后带尿管时间、术前及术后IPSS评分(国际前列腺症状评分)。结果:两组病例仅术后IPSS评分比较有统计学意义(P<0.05),分离电切组与传统电切组IPSS评分分别为(8.70±1.13)分和(9.95±1.54)分。结论:经尿道等离子前列腺分离电切术和等离子刀经尿道传统电切术比较,经尿道等离子前列腺分离电切术临床疗效更为显著。     

Rotoresection versus transurethral resection of the prostate: short-term evaluation of a prospective randomized study

PURPOSE: We compared in a prospective fashion the short-term outcome of rotoresection to transurethral resection of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 patients with bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomized into 2 groups, rotoresection and transurethral resection of the prostate. Mean+/-SD patient age was 60.76+/-5.85 years in the rotoresection and 64.24+/-6.84 in the transurethral resection groups. All patients had an International Prostate Symptom Score of 8 or more, maximum free flow rate less than 15 ml per second, prostate volume 20 to 100 ml and prostate specific antigen 1 to 4 ng/ml. Pressure flow study revealed bladder outlet obstruction (Schafer's grade 3 or more). Patients were assessed at 1, 3 and 6 months by International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum free flow rate, transrectal ultrasound, pressure flow study, hemoglobin and urinalysis. RESULTS: At 6 months International Prostate Symptom Score decreased from 26.2+/-4.06 to 5.32+/-1.52 in the rotoresection group and from 22.84+/-4.56 to 7+/-1.4 in the transurethral resection group. Maximum free flow rate increased from 7.87+/-2.24 to 25.29+/-10.39 ml per second in the rotoresection group and from 9.44+/-2.29 to 25.2+/-5.8 ml per second in the transurethral group. Prostate volume decreased from 41.2+/-16.58 to 17.24+/-7.61 ml in the rotoresection group and from 40.6+/-16.93 to 18.28+/-8.75 ml in the transurethral group. Detrusor pressure at maximum flow and Schafer grade decreased from 79.84+/-26.8 cm H2O and 4.24+/-0.97 to 38.8+/-18.8 cm H2O and 1.24+/-0.93 in the rotoresection group, and from 63.04+/-21.08 cm H2O and 3.48+/-0.65 to 34.16+/-12.7 cm H2O and 1+/-0.7 in the transurethral group. Dilutional hyponatremia was higher with transurethral resection of the prostate (p=0.005) but no patient showed manifestations of the transurethral syndrome. Mild stress urinary incontinence was noted in 4 patients in the rotoresection group and in 3 in the transurethral group. CONCLUSIONS: Rotoresection is a safe and effective method of treating bladder outlet obstruction resulting from benign prostatic hyperplasia, and its efficacy is comparable to transurethral resection of the prostate.