改良TAPP在双侧腹股沟疝的应用

目的探讨改良的经腹腹膜前腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(改良TAPP)对双侧腹股沟疝的临床价值。方法 2002年9月至2014年7月,对39例无选择性腹股沟疝患者实施经改良过的经腹腹膜前腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(应用脐内侧襞覆盖网片的方法)。结果全部在腹腔镜下完成,自切皮开始至关脐完毕需花30~115min,手术时间均值为:(61.59±5.54)min。出血量均少于10ml。结论改良的经腹腹膜前腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(改良TAPP)对双侧腹沟疝的的手术治疗简单易行,安全,并发症少,费用低,值得推广。     

腹腔镜腹膜前疝修补新方法

目的:探讨腹腔镜腹膜前疝修补新方法的临床应用价值。方法:采用自行设计的腹腔镜腹膜前疝修补术治疗5例腹股沟疝患者,经腹腔在腹腔镜下旷置疝囊,在疝环口内外侧纵行切开并潜行游离腹膜,于腹膜前放置补片,覆盖疝环口,再用脐外侧韧带覆盖补片。结果:手术均获成功,无并发症发生,随访1年未见复发。结论:腹腔镜腹膜前疝修补新方法安全,可靠,方便易行,术后患者康复快、疼痛轻、效果好。     

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术常规

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术是一种安全、技术合理的无张力修补手术。腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术适用于Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型、Ⅲ型和IV型的腹股沟直疝、斜疝和股疝(中华外科学会疝与腹壁外科学组2003年8月修订稿)。腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术主要包括两种方法:经腹腹膜前补片植入术(TAPP),全腹膜外补片植     

经脐入路腹腔镜腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术4例报告

目的:探讨经脐入路腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(transabdominal preperitoneal prosthesis,TAPP)的安全性、可行性及近期疗效.方法:用改良腹腔镜器械为4例腹股沟斜疝患者行经脐入路腹腔镜TAPP.观察手术时间、出血量、住院时间及术中、术后并发症.结果:4例手术均获成功,手术时间5...     

腹腔镜下行疝修补术的75例经验

目的：探讨腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补手术的方法、适应证及优缺点。方法：75例腹股沟疝用腹腔镜进行了疝修补术，其中斜疝53例，不完全性疝8例，直疝14例。行单纯疝囊高位结扎10例，经腹腔腹膜前补片植入术（TAPP）48例52例疝，完全腹膜外行补片植入术（TEP）者17例。结果：手术全部成功完成，平均手术时间62．5（10－180)min，无中转手术，8例病人同时行了阑尾切除术，4例病人同时行了胆囊切除术；术后平均5．4d出院。1例直疝于TAPP术后8月因补片过小而复发。结论：腹腔镜疝修补术是一种安全而先进的无张力疝修补手术，手术后恢复时间短，复发率低。     

腹腔镜腹膜前补片植入法腹股沟疝修补术50例报告

目的探讨腹腔镜腹膜前补片植入腹股沟疝修补术(transabdominalprepenritoneallaparoscopicherniarepair,TAPP)的临床疗效。方法从脐及两侧旁开10cm穿刺,置入摄像头及内镜器械,自疝内环上约5cm处近脐外侧壁打开壁腹膜,游离疝囊,后置入补片,覆盖整个缺损区,将补片用钉合器固定在耻骨梳韧带及联合腱上。结果50例腹腔镜手术均成功,手术时间20~70min,(39.8±10.5)min。术后腹股沟区疼痛1例,尿潴留2例。术后住院1~4d,平均2d。50例随访1~11个月,平均7个月,无复发。结论TAPP是安全有效的无张力疝修补术。     

腹腔镜视野下的腹股沟区的解剖要点

目的对腹腔镜视野下对腹股沟区后壁的解剖结构进行观察,探讨腹腔镜下后入路腹膜前间隙腹股沟疝修补术的要点与难点。 方法回顾性分析2013年1月至2018年12月武汉市第一医院所完成的1500例腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补手术（LIHR）的视频资料,来对腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术（TEP）和腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术（TAPP）的手术路径、解剖标志、操作要点进行归纳总结。 结果在1500例LIHR手术中,TEP方式为660例,TAPP方式为840例。TEP手术和TAPP手术具有不同的手术入路;两种方式的手术区域都在腹膜前间隙（包括Retzius和Bogros间隙）;两种手术方式需要辨认相同的解剖标志：如耻骨梳韧带、腹壁下血管、精索结构或子宫圆韧带、Doom三角、死亡冠、髂外血管以及股外侧皮神经和生殖股神经等结构;两种手术方式均需要分离出足够大的腹膜前间隙范围,并正确分离处理疝囊,完成精索去腹膜化,使用10 cm×15 cm的聚丙烯网片完全覆盖整个肌耻骨孔（包括内环、直疝三角及股环）。 结论TEP及TAPP手术都是LIHR的有效的修补方式,熟悉腹腔镜视野下腹股沟后壁的解剖特点,有利于缩短LIHR的学习曲线并更好的掌握该手术方式。     

腹腔镜疝修补手术222例经验

目的 探讨腹腔镜疝修补手术的方法和优缺点。方法1995年6月至2005年6月，对我院收治的222例腹部各类型疝进行了腹腔镜疝修补手术，手术方法包括腹腔镜疝环高位结扎术21例．经腹腔腹膜前补片腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术（TAPP）166例，完全腹膜外补片腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术（TEP）25例．腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术2例、腹腔镜膈疝修补术1例、腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补胃底折叠术6例、腹腔镜小肠系膜裂孔疝修补术1例。其中45例患者同时进行了其他疾病的腹腔镜手术。结果手术均顺利，无中转开腹。手术时间42．5min[（10～180）min]，术后平均4．6d出院。仅1例直疝TAPP术后半年复发。结论腹腔镜疝修补术是一种安全而有效的疝修补方法，具有术后复发率和并发症发生率低的优点，适于绝大部分腹部疝疾病的治疗。     

腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术与Lichtenstein疝修补术对比研究

目的比较腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)与Lichtenstein修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床应用价值。方法分别对46例接受TAPP手术与140例接受Lichtenstein修补术的腹股沟疝患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果两组在手术时间、术后下床活动时间、生活自理时间、住院天数、恢复日常工作天数方面,均无显著性差异(P0.05),两组术后均无复发。结论腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术与Lichtenstein修补术均为腹股沟疝的良好修补法,但复发疝、双侧疝及腹腔联合手术的患者更适合选择腹腔镜手术。     

青年腹股沟疝治疗策略

青年腹股沟疝的治疗不仅要考虑手术修补方法的选择、降低复发率和减少手术并发症等,还要注意手术对病人生育功能的影响。对于Ⅰ型或Ⅱ型青年人腹股沟疝采用Bassinni或Shouldice方法修补或无张力修补,Ⅲ型疝或复发疝建议应用补片进行无张力修补,补片最好选用生物补片。Lichtenstein修补术可以选用生物补片或轻量大网孔合成补片。采用腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)或经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)治疗青年腹股沟疝时应选用生物补片。较大的疝囊可以横断结扎,避免在游离疝囊过程中损伤精索血管或输精管。     

Totally extrafasdal endoscopie preperitoneal hernia repair: a merger of anatomy and surgery. The exact description to endoscopkally dissect the spermatic fascia

Summary  Stoppa introduced giant preperitoneal mesh repair after parietalisation of the cord in inguinal hernias. Based on this principle, a preperitoneal mesh is inserted during the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair. Central to the Stoppa operation is identification of the bloodless plane between peritoneum and urogenital fascia. Dissection of this plane has not been described for the TAPP hernia repair. We present a reproducible, anatomicallybased method of finding and dissecting the urogenital fascia in the TAPP. Methods: After routine peritoneal incision, the urogenital fascia is identified late-rally in the Bogros space, where it is loosely adherent to the peritoneum. Here, developing the cleavage plane between the fascia and peritoneum is easy. The dissection is extended medially into the space of Retzius. Once the medial and lateral planes have been dissected, reducing the hernia sac is uncomplicated and bloodless. Because the urogenital fascia continues around the cord structures as the spermatic sheath, there is no danger of damaging these and it is easy to parietalise the vas deferens and testicular vessels. The mesh is then inserted true to the original dictates of Stoppa. Discussion: The precise preperitoneal dissection plane has not been elucidated for laparoscopy. The fascial anatomy in the groin is a complex arrangement between peritoneum, urogenital fascia and transversalis fascia. Dissection between the correct fascial layers allows rapid identification of the exact anatomy in an avascular plane. This ensures true parietalisation of the cord structures in an ordered and anatomically correct fashion.     

Recurrent hernia following endoscopic total extraperitoneal repair

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A retrospective study was conducted to identify the reasons for recurrence following endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair of inguinal hernias and to develop a strategy to prevent recurrence. METHOD: Between January 1996 and December 2001, 1193 TEP hernia repairs were performed in 694 patients. Following reduction of the hernia sac and dissection of the preperitoneal space up to the psoas muscles laterally, a Prolene mesh (15 x 15 cm) was placed. The mesh was fixed medially to the Cooper ligament with two or three spiral tacks. In six patients, the hernia recurred following endoscopic TEP repair within the same period. Four of these patients elected to undergo laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair of the recurrent hernia. RESULTS: Medial recurrences developed in three of the four patients because of medial displacement of the mesh. One patient was found to have a missed indirect hernia sac. All the patients who underwent laparoscopic TAPP repair had an uneventful recovery and are well at follow-up. CONCLUSION: In addition to medial fixation of the mesh to the Cooper ligament, complete proximal dissection of the peritoneum from the spermatic cord and additional fixation of the mesh to the anterior abdominal wall, with careful avoidance of possible injury to the adjacent nerves, may prevent recurrences.     

经腹腹膜前腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术（TAPP）502例

目的探讨经腹腹膜前腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术（1aparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair,TAPP）的手术效果。方法2003年3月～2009年8月,行TAPP手术502例（包括双侧110例）,合并胆囊病变18例,慢性阑尾炎1例,同时行腹腔镜胆囊或阑尾切除术。建立CO2气腹后,剪开腹膜并横断疝囊,于腹膜前置入聚丙烯网状补片固定,闭合腹膜。结果本组502例均治愈出院。主要并发症有腹股沟区血肿或积液7．6％（38／502）,尿潴留20．7％（104／502）。479例随访6—86个月,平均32.6月,其中226例〉24个月。近期（术后1个月内）复发1例,远期复发2例,总的复发率为0．6％（3／479）。结论TAPP治疗腹股沟疝是安全有效的,并发症及复发率可以接受。     

Missed lipoma of the spermatic cord

BACKGROUND: Missed lipoma of the spermatic cord is a pitfall unique to the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) laparoscopic hernia repair. This problem occurs when a palpable inguinal mass is noted preoperatively, but no identifiable hernia defect is found at time of laparoscopy and the procedure is terminated. METHODS: Our group encountered six patients without intraperitoneal defects that had large cord lipomas on preperitoneal exploration. Two of these patients had undergone previous intraabdominal laparoscopy for a proposed TAPP repair, which was aborted when no defect was seen. RESULTS: Both patients were referred for continued symptomatic groin masses, which were subsequently treated by lipoma resection in conjunction with inguinal floor repair. CONCLUSIONS: When patients present with a groin mass, exploration of the preperitoneal space and cord structures is indicated during TAPP repair, even in the presence of a normal-appearing abdominal floor. Abandoning a transabdominal approach without exploration of the preperitoneal structures may lead to a failure to identify symptomatic and/or palpable cord lipomas.     

Crucial anatomy and technical cues for laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair: Advanced manipulation for groin hernias in adults

Groin hernias include indirect inguinal, direct inguinal, and femoral hernias. Obturator and supravesical hernias appear very close to the groin. High-quality repairs are required for groin hernias. The concept of "tension-free repair" is generally accepted, and surgical repairs with mesh are categorized as "hernioplasties". Surgeons should have good knowledge of the relevant anatomy. Physicians generally focus on the preperitoneal space, myopectineal orifice, topographic nerves, and regional vessels. Currently, laparoscopic surgery has therapeutic potential in the surgical setting for hernioplasty, with laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal(TAPP) repair appearing to be a powerful tool for use in adult hernia patients. TAPP offers the advantages of accurate diagnoses, repair of bilateral and recurrent hernias, less postoperative pain, early recovery allowing work and activities, tension-free repair of the preperitoneal(posterior) space, ability to cover obturator hernias, and avoidance of potential injury to the spermatic cord. The disadvantages of TAPP are the need for general anesthesia, adhering to a learning curve, higher cost, unexpected complications related to abdominal organs, adhesion to the mesh, unexpected injuries to vessels, prolonged operative time, and as-yet-unknown long-term outcomes. Both technical skill and anatomical familiarity are important for safe, reliable surgery. With increasing awareness of the importance of anatomy during TAPP repair, we address the skills and pitfalls during laparoscopic TAPP repair in adult patients using illustrations and schemas. We also address debatable points on this subject.     

Laparoscopic repair of strangulated hernias

Background Although laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal polypropylene (TAPP) hernia repair is now a recognized procedure for groin hernia repair in patients undergoing elective surgery, there is a scarcity of data on TAPP repair in emergency situations such as those involving strangulated hernias. Methods Unless contraindicated, the authors’ department considers laparoscopic TAPP repair the procedure of choice for all strangulated hernias. A prospective database of 1,532 consecutive hernia repairs performed between May 1998 and April 2004 was reviewed. Results A total of 28 irreducible strangulated hernias were observed and repaired through laparoscopic TAPP. There were three conversions (10.7%): one because of extensive adhesions and two because of bowel distention. Resection became necessary in 9 (36%) of the 25 cases involving effective TAPP repair of strangulated hernias. The mean operation time, with and without resection, was 103 and 55 min, respectively. The rate of postoperative morbidity was 4% because of one inguinal hematoma case. During a mean follow-up period of 340 days, there were no recurrences after TAPP repair. Conclusions For selected patients, the TAPP approach appears to be a good therapeutic option for strangulated hernias.     

Early experience with laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a district general National Health Services hospital

The introduction of laparoscopic hernia repair into the National Health Services (NHS) gave us an opportunity to study the feasibility and practicality of carrying out this modern hernia repair technique in a district general NHS hospital. The laparoscopic tension-free transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) method of hernia repair, as we do it, is cost-effective and efficacious. Most patients can be treated as day cases. We discovered incidental hernias in 18.8% of patients, which were treated simultaneously. A low recurrence rate (0.17%) with low morbidity makes it an attractive method for routine treatment of groin hernias in the NHS.     

Transabdominal preperitoneal repair of a port-site incisional hernia

A 47-year-old woman presented with an incisional hernia at the site of a 10-mm port placed in the left iliac fossa during laparoscopic oopherectomy performed 6 years previously. The hernia was repaired laparoscopically by a transabdominal preperitoneal approach using one 10-mm and two 5-mm ports. Adherent omentum was reduced from the sac and a wide flap of peritoneum extending 5 cm on all sides of the fascial defect was raised. The peritoneum was circumcised around the neck of the sac, leaving the sac undisturbed. A 12 x 12 cm polypropylene mesh was placed in the preperitoneal plane and secured in place with endoscopic spiral tackers. The peritoneal incision was approximated with a running 2-0 polyglactin suture. The patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged after 48 hours. She resumed normal activity within 5 days and remains well one year later. A transabdominal preperitoneal repair seems a feasible alternative for repair of port-site incisional hernias that usually occur through a single and small fascial defect.     

Scrotal hernias: a contraindication for an endoscopic procedure?

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic repair was introduced for use with inguinal hernia therapy more than 10 years ago. The technique as well as the indications for this method are debated, however. As a borderline inguinal hernia situation, the scrotal hernia in particular evokes vehement objections to an endoscopic procedure because of the anticipated problems and complications in dissecting the extended hernia sac. The efficiency of the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) technique in the treatment of scrotal hernia therefore is discussed in this article. METHODS: Laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP) has been performed in our department since 1993. Data are collected by a prospective documentation of operative and follow-up results. For evaluation, a comparison of scrotal and normal hernia repair was performed. RESULTS: Between April 1993 and June 1998 the TAPP technique was used to treat 191 scrotal hernias, 42 (22%) of which were recurrent hernias. The median operating time for a normal inguinal hernia repair was 45 min, whereas scrotal hernias required a median of 65 min and irreducible scrotral hernias a median of 68.5 min. Major complications were observed in 1.6% of scrotal and 0.6% of normal inguinal hernia repairs. The most frequent scrotal hernia repair problem was the formation of a seroma, 10.5% of which had to be evacuated. During a follow-up period of 30 months, we found a total of two recurrences (1.05%). CONCLUSION: In scrotal hernia repair, TAPP is not associated with higher complication rates and can be performed with efficiency comparable with that in normal inguinal hernia repair.