食管裂孔疝的腹腔镜治疗

目的:探讨使用腹腔镜行食管裂孔疝修补术的疗效和安全牲.方法:对62例食管裂孔疝患者行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术,其中46例做胃底270o部分折叠术(Toupet术),16例做胃底360o折叠术(Nissen术).21例应用补片修补疝缺口,41例采用7号丝线缝合.随访时间中位数18个月.结果:62例腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术全部成功.手术时间110(30～190)min,失血10～50 mL;术后24～48 h进流质饮食,无术后并发症;术后平均住院5.7 d.结论:腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术具有疗效确定、安全和创伤小的优点,值得进一步推广应用.     

腹腔镜治疗小儿食管裂孔疝的疗效分析

目的:探讨腹腔镜治疗小儿食管裂孔疝的有效率、术后并发症及满意度。方法:回顾分析2011年12月至2015年12月收治的食管裂孔疝患儿的临床资料,电话问卷调查术后症状评分、症状复发、术后并发症及满意度情况。结果:共成功随访42例,其中Ⅰ型食管裂孔疝31例,Ⅱ型2例,Ⅲ型6例,Ⅳ型3例。手术治疗总体有效率为90.2%,术后患者各项症状评分较治疗前均有显著下降。症状复发2例,解剖复发3例。术后长期并发症发生率为9.5%。90.5%的患儿对治疗效果满意,9.5%感觉一般,无一例不满意。结论:腹腔镜治疗小儿食管裂孔疝具有微创、复发率低、并发症少、满意度高等优势,经验丰富、操作熟练的外科医生不仅能降低手术复发率、减少术后并发症,也能提高手术有效率。     

腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的临床分析

目的：总结腹腔镜下应用补片行食管裂孔疝修补和部分胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝的初步经验。方法：2007年5月至2009年12月为13例食管裂孔疝患者行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术或（和）胃底折叠术。观察术后相关并发症。结果：13例手术均获成功,无中转开放手术。手术时间130-205min,平均152min,术中基本无出血。术后第2天开始饮水,第3天开始进流质饮食。术后住院4-6d。1例直接缝合者术日晚发生气胸,经胸腔穿刺抽气消失。1例胃底折叠术患者在开始进普通饮食时有轻微吞咽困难,术后1个月临床症状消失。术后随访6-12个月,平均8.5个月,行钡餐造影或CT检查均未见复发。结论：腹腔镜下应用补片和（或）胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝安全有效,值得临床推广。     

腹腔镜技术治疗食管裂孔疝

食管裂孔疝的手术步骤包括两部份：食管裂孔的整形和胃底折叠术，后者是预防术后复发的关键步骤。传统的手术方式有经胸的Mark1V、经腹的Nissen、Toupet、Hill、Dor等各类胃底折叠术。经胸手术切口大、心肺干扰重、麻醉要求高，且大多只能完成食管裂孔的修复，而实施胃底折叠术则需在膈肌上另行切口，对呼吸功能影响较大；经腹手术虽然减轻了心肺干扰，但在膈顶操作空间小，切口较大，很多病人在疾病早期因担心手术创伤而不愿接受手术治疗。     

腹腔镜手术治疗食管裂孔疝及胃食管反流性疾病的临床体会

目的:探讨腹腔镜手术治疗食管裂孔疝及胃食管反流性疾病的临床疗效及安全性。方法:回顾分析2009年1月至2012年11月36例食管裂孔疝及胃食管反流性疾病患者的临床资料,20例行腹腔镜手术(腹腔镜组),16例行开腹手术(开腹组)。观察两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后抗生素使用时间、术后胃肠道功能恢复时间及术后并发症。结果:腹腔镜组手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后抗生素使用时间、术后胃肠道功能恢复时间及术后并发症发生率均显著优于开腹组(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜手术治疗食管裂孔疝及胃食管反流性疾病安全、可靠,具有广阔的临床应用前景。     

腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术不同手术方式的临床疗效及预后分析北大核心CSCD

目的比较不同手术方式在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术中的有效性及复发率的差异。方法回顾性分析2016年1月至2022年3月于兰州大学第一医院、甘肃省人民医院及甘肃省中医院行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术治疗的90例食管裂孔疝患者的临床资料,其中26例未使用补片,29例使用合成补片,35例使用生物补片。对三组患者进行术后随访,比较三组患者手术时间、术中出血量、手术费用及术后并发症发生率、复发率以及满意度等指标。结果 90例均顺利完成手术,无中转开腹病例。三组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院天数差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05),未使用补片组住院费用与合成补片和生物补片组相比更具有经济学优势,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。87例患者获得长期随访,随访率为96.7%(87/90),中位随访时间为44个月。术后并发症(腹泻、吞咽困难、腹胀、胸痛)发生率、症状复发率(反酸、烧心)以及患者满意度,三组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论在食管裂孔疝修补术中,应根据术中具体情况,谨慎选择补片。     

腹腔镜下胃底Nissen折叠术式治疗的食管裂孔疝临床应用

目的探讨使用腹腔镜行食管裂孔疝修补术的安全性和疗效评价。方法对38例食管裂孔疝患者使用腹腔镜行食管裂孔疝修补术,做胃底360°折叠术(Nissen术),9例应用补片修补疝缺口,29例采用7号丝线缝合。结果38例腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术全部获得成功。手术时间30～190min,平均手术时间110min,失血10～50ml;术后24～48h进流质饮食,无术后并发症;术后平均住院5.7d。结论腹腔镜下胃底Nissen折叠术式具有疗效好、安全和创伤小的优点。值得进一步推广应用。     

腹腔镜Toupet胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病的临床疗效

目的探讨腹腔镜Toupet胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病的临床疗效。 方法选取2012年1月至2018年6月,吉林大学第二医院就诊的80例食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病患者为研究对象。依据患者具体状况行不同类型的疝修补术,所有患者均行腹腔镜Toupet胃底折叠术。于术后统计患者手术效果及反流情况,观察手术前后食管压变化。 结果与术前相比,术后6个月患者反流时间显著缩短、反流次数与长反流次数显著减少、酸反流时间百分比显著下降,差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。与术前相比,术后6个月患者DeMeester及GERDQ评分均显著下降,差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。与术前比较,术后6个月患者LES压力、残余压均显著升高,松弛率显著下降,差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。 结论腹腔镜Toupet胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病可有效增加食管压力,抑制患者反流症状,疗效良好,值得推广应用。     

腹腔镜食道裂孔疝修补术的临床效果分析：附51例报告

目的:探讨腹腔镜食道裂孔疝修补术的安全性和疗效。方法:回顾分析2012年7月—2016年7月51例行腹腔镜食道裂孔疝修补术的患者临床资料。结果:51例患者均顺利接受腹腔镜食道裂孔疝修补术。术中裂孔缝合修补后均采用补片加强固定。对无明显禁忌证患者,同时行Dor胃底折叠术。平均时间(100±15.4)min,术中出血量平均(28±15.4)mL,术后平均住院时间2d。术后胸痛、进食后哽噎等疝囊压迫症状明显缓解,反酸,烧心等反流症状也得到明显改善。无严重并发症发生,均在4周内恢复正常饮食。平均随访32个月,未见裂孔疝复发及补片相关并发症。结论:腹腔镜食道裂孔疝修补术是安全有效的手术方式,食道裂孔缝合关闭后使用补片加强修补可以降低裂孔疝的复发率。     

食管裂孔疝与呼吸道症状临床相关性研究

目的 探讨食管裂孔疝(hiatal hernia,HH)与呼吸道症状相关性.方法 2009年1-12月在胃食管反流中心收集HH住院患者,分别对其性别、年龄、临床症状及诊治进行临床分析.结果 在362例胃食管反流疾病(gastroesophageal reflux disease,GERD)患者中,196例有HH(54.1％),其中132例有呼吸道症状,64例无呼吸道症状,结果显示HH与呼吸道症状有相关性(x2=15.3,P=0).进一步多变量分析研究显示HH能增加呼吸道症状的风险(优势比OR值2.3,95％可信区间CI 1.5～3.6).196例HH患者中,178例行胃底折叠术并裂孔疝修补术,7例行胃底折叠术,11例保守治疗,术后168例疝修补术患者得到随访,平均随访(12±3)个月;7例胃底折叠术患者平均随访(12±4)个月,总有效率85.1％.结论 HH发病隐匿,由于其独特的形成因素,HH能增加反流及呼吸道症状的风险.通过有效的诊断并积极治疗HH,能显著减轻反流及其引起的呼吸道症状.     

Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia

Large paraesophageal hernias are generally repaired by reduction of the stomach into the abdomen, sac excision, crural closure, and gastropexy or fundoplication. After gaining experience performing laparoscopic repair of sliding hiatal hernias and Nissen fundoplication we combined laparoscopic access with traditional surgical technique in treating patients with complex paraesophageal hernias.Ten adults, six males and four females, with type III paraesophageal hernias underwent laparoscopic repair between February 1993 and April 1994. The average age of the patients was 60.4 years (range 38–81). Using five ports (three 10 mm and two 5 mm), the stomach was reduced into the abdomen, the hernia sac was resected, and the defect was closed with pledgeted horizontal mattress sutures. In addition, nine patients had a Nissen fundoplication performed and one patient had a diaphragmatic gastropexy.The procedure was completed laparoscopically in all ten cases and the median operating time was 282 min (range 165–430). Two complications occurred, an intraoperative gastric laceration, and a postoperative mediastinal seroma. All patients were discharged on the 2nd or 3rd postoperative day. Eight of nine patients were asymptomatic at last follow-up (mean 8.9 months postop). One patient has mild dysphagia and heartburn from partial migration of the fundoplication into the chest. One patient died 3 months postoperatively of unrelated causes. Paraesophageal hernia can be reduced and repaired safely with laparoscopic access using standard surgical techniques.Presented at the annual meeting of the Society of American Gastro-intestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), Nashville, Tennessee, USA, 18–19 April 1994     

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair, a challenging operation: Medium-term outcome of 116 patients

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repairs performed in 116 patients between 1992 and 2001 were pro-spectively analyzed. Perioperative outcomes were assessed and follow-up was performed under protocol. There were 85 female and 31 male patients who had a mean (± SD)ageof65 ± 13 years and an American Society of Anesthesiology score of 2.3 ± 0.6. All but two patients underwent an antireflux procedure. Gastropexy was performed in 48 patients, an esophageal lengthening procedure in six patients, and prosthetic closure of the hiatus in six patients. Major complications occurred in five patients (4.3%) with two postoperative deaths (1.7%). Mean follow-up was 30 ± 25 months; 96 patients (83%) have been followed for more than 6 months. Among these patients, 73 (76%) are asymptomatic, 11 (11%) have mild symptoms, and 12 (13%) take antacid medications. Protocol barium esophagograms were obtained in 69% of patients at 6 to 12 months’ follow-up. Recurrence of hiatal hernia was documented in 21 patients (22% overall and in 32% of those undergoing contrast studies). Reoperation has been performed in three patients (3 %). When only the patients with recurrent hiatal hernias are considered, 13 (62 %) are symptomatic but only six (28%) require medication for symptoms. Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair is generally safe, even in this high-risk group. This study confirms a relatively high incidence of recurrent hiatal abnormalities after paraesophageal hernia repair; however, most recurrent hiatal hernias are small and only 3% have required reoperation. Protocol esophagograms detect recurrences that are minimally symptomatic. Improved techniques must be devised to improve the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Presented at the Forty-Third Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, San Francisco, California, May 19–22, 2002 (oral presentation). Supported by the Washington University Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery.     

腹腔镜下巨大食管裂孔疝修补术25例

目的 探讨腹腔镜巨大食管裂孔疝修补术的临床特点和可行性.方法 2008年1月至2010年8月,应用腹腔镜治疗25例巨大食管裂孔疝,术中均使用专用补片修补食管裂孔,16例同时行胃底折叠术,记录围手术期相关指标,并随访观察治疗效果和术后复发情况.结果 25例均完成腹腔镜手术,手术85～210 min,平均106 min;术中出血量55～150 ml,平均94 ml.术后住院4～21天,平均6.8天.术后症状均得到缓解,无严重并发症,随访3～35个月,平均13.6个月,病人满意率为88%,4例出现轻度反酸症状,1例裂孔疝复发.结论 腹腔镜巨大食管裂孔疝修补术安全、可行,具有创伤小、恢复快、疗效可靠的特点,术中应用Bard CruraSoft补片可缩短手术时间,降低修补食管裂孔的难度,减少复发.

Abstract：

Objective To investigate the clinical characteristics and feasibility of laparoscopic repair of giant hiatal hernia. Methods From January 2008 to August 2010, 25 consecutive patients with giant hiatal hernia underwent laparoscopic repair. Crural closure was performed by means of two or three interrupted nonabsorbable sutures plus a tailored PTFE/ePTFE composite mesh. It was patched across the defect and secured to each crura with staples. Laparoscopic fundoplication was performed concomitantly in 16 cases according to the specific conditions of patients. Para-operative clinical parameters were recorded. All patients were routinely followed up. Clinical outcomes were collected and analyzed. Results All laparoscopic surgeries were accomplished successfully. The operating time was 85 -210 minutes (mean, 106 minutes) ,the operative blood loss was 55 - 150 ml( mean, 94 ml) ,the postoperative hospital stay was 4 -21 days( mean, 6.8 days). The symptoms in most cases were adequately relieved after operation. There was no severe postoperative morbidity. After the follow-up period of 3 - 35months ( mean, 13.6 months), the satisfaction rate of surgery was 88%. 4 cases had mild symptom recurrence of acid reflux.Hiatal hernia recurrence occurred in 1 case. Conclusions Laparoscopic repair of giant hiatal hernia is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure, with the advantages of minimized trauma, quick recovery and reliable effect. The use of a tailored PTFE/ePTFE composite mesh ( Bard CruraSoft Mesh)for giant hiatal hernia proved to be effective in reducing the operation time and technique demands, and the rate of postoperative hernia recurrence, with a very low incidence of mesh-related complications.     

腹腔镜在食管裂孔疝修补术中的临床应用

目的探讨腹腔镜在食道裂孔疝修补术中应用的疗效及安全性。方法运用腹腔镜对21例食道裂孔疝患者行食道裂孔疝修补术,其中13例食道裂孔缺损≥4 cm者使用巴德Cru-raSoft补片进行修补,8例缺损4 cm者用2-0普理灵缝线连续缝合将两膈肌脚关闭。同时将胃底固定于食道左侧膈肌下,以恢复锐性His角。结果 21例均顺利完成疝修补术,无中转开腹,未出现并发症。平均手术时间117 min;平均出血量约36.7 ml;平均住院日3.7 d。术后3个月行胃镜复查,显示患者的食道炎均已明显好转,未见消化性溃疡或糜烂性胃炎;术后随访3～30个月,单纯缝合修补者有2例复发。结论对于老年人要适当控制气腹的压力。腹腔镜手术的高清晰度、宽广视野是直视手术所无法比拟的,用以治疗食道裂孔疝有手术损伤小、出血少、患者恢复快、住院时间短等优点,其并发症的发生率和死亡率都比开腹直视手术要低。腹腔镜下行食道裂孔疝修补的治疗是安全可行的,值得临床推广应用。     

Laparoscopic repair of incidentally found Spigelian hernia

Background and Objectives:

A Spigelian hernia is a rare type of hernia that occurs through a defect in the anterior abdominal wall adjacent to the linea semilunaris. Estimation of its incidence has been reported as 0.12% of all abdominal wall hernias. Traditionally, the method of repair has been an open approach. Herein, we discuss a series of laparoscopic repairs.

Methods:

Case series and review of the literature.

Cases:

Three patients are presented. All were evaluated and taken to surgery initially for a different disease process, and all were incidentally found to have a spigelian hernia. These patients underwent laparoscopic repair of their hernias; 2 were repaired intraperitoneally and one was repaired totally extraperitoneally. Two patients initially underwent a mesh repair, while the third had an attempted primary repair.

Conclusions:

There is evidence that supports the use of laparoscopy for both diagnosis and repair of spigelian hernias. There are also reports of successful repairs both primarily and with mesh. In our experience with the preceding 3 patients, we found that laparoscopic repair of incidentally discovered spigelian hernias is a viable option, and we also found that implantation of mesh, when possible, resulted in satisfactory results and no recurrence.     

腹腔镜补片修补巨大食管裂孔疝

目的探讨腹腔镜补片修补巨大食管裂孔疝的安全性和有效性。方法 2006年5月至2010年5月应用腹腔镜补片修补食管裂孔疝12例,采用全身麻醉,材料为聚丙烯和聚四氟乙烯补片,剪裁7.5cm×7.5cm大小圆形补片,用EMS固定于膈肌上。结果全部患者手术成功。术后1个月复查,症状按Visick评分：12例均为VisickⅠ。胃镜检查：食管下端糜烂减轻或消失。食管压力测定：（16.33±3.07）mmHg。24h食管内pH值〈4,总时间百分比均〈4%。钡餐检查：12例胸腔胃全部位于膈下腹腔内。12例患者随访1～5年,无胃烧灼感、反流症状,胃镜食管炎消失,钡餐食管裂孔疝无复发。5例贫血者,血色素升至正常。结论腹腔镜下补片修补食管裂孔疝安全、有效且复发率低。补片相关并发症需进一步随访观察。     

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术（TAPP）

此病例为女性斜疝患者,应用腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术（TAPP）治疗。腹腔镜治疗女性腹股沟疝有其特殊性,原因是女性患者的子宫圆韧带与腹膜非常致密,不象男性患者的精索那样可以轻易的做到“腹壁化（Parietalization）”,因此补片往往无法覆盖在子宫圆韧带和腹膜之间。该手术有两个不同于男性患者的操作步骤：（1）游离疝囊至内环口水平即可,不强调子宫圆韧带的“腹壁化”。（2）补片剪一开口,绕过子宫圆韧带覆盖在其后方,而不是平铺在其前方。补片开口处可用缝合或医用胶等方法关闭,相当于进行内环口整形。     

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术36例分析

目的 探讨腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的优点手术技巧及疗效.方法 2007-07～2009-07行腹腔镜经腹膜前补片植入术(transabdominal preperitoneal,TAPP)和伞腹膜外补片植入(totally extrperitoneal,TEP)共36例,其中腹股沟斜疝28例,腹股沟直疝5例,复合疝3例.结...     

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair

The term paraesophageal hernia is described as a herniation of the gastric fundus through the open hiatus into the thoracic cavity while the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) remains in its normal anatomic position. This is considered a rolling esophageal hernia (Type II), and it is the least commonly encountered hiatal hernia. A more commonly encountered herniation of the fundus of the stomach is the Type III hernia, in which both the LES and the fundus herniate into the chest. This has also been classified as a paraesophageal hernia. The most common hiatal hernia is a sliding hiatal hernia (Type I), which consists of herniation of the stomach through the esophageal hiatus, causing the LES and gastric cardia to lie in the thoracic cavity. There are several controversial issues involved in paraesophageal hernia repair, including indications for surgery, the most appropriate surgical approach, and the need for a concomitant antireflux procedure. The increasing popularity of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair has dramatically altered the approach to these patients and has allowed patients at higher risk to better tolerate this procedure with a decrease in morbidity and mortality. However, they remain difficult surgical procedures.