36例腹腔镜腹壁切口疝无张力修补术患者围手术期的护理分析

选取2016-12-2018-01间在睢县人民医院接受腹腔镜腹壁切口疝无张力修补术治疗的36例患者,围手术期在做好术前心理、肠道准备等护理措施,术后在严密监测生命体征、完善呼吸道管理的基础上,加强切口感染及腹压增高等并发症的预防措施。36例患者的手术时间为(61.06±8.20)min,住院时间为(7.10±0.50)d。切口甲级愈合34例。2例切口脂肪液化的患者,经对症治疗后愈合。出院后患者均获随访12~18个月,其间未出现复发病例。     

复杂腹壁切口疝修补

目前大部分腹壁切口疝补片修补都有比较规范手术方法可遵循,但有些切口疝病例则难以遵循常规修补方法,处理时较为棘手,以下就这类病例的手术难点作一论述.     

腹腔镜切口疝修补术与开放式切口疝修补术的比较研究

目的：比较腹腔镜切口疝修补术（LVHR）与开放切口疝修补术（OVHR）的临床疗效。方法：总结我院2005年1月-2011年1月治疗的腹壁切口疝（VIH）72例患者的临床资料,其中OVHR组32例,LVHR组40例。结果：OVHR组手术时间60～145min,平均手术时间（90±35）min;术中出血25～200mL,平均（95±15）mL;住院时间4～35d,平均（7．5±5．8）d,术区感染3例。LVHR组手术时间35～135min,平均手术时间（82±32）min;术中出血15～160mL,平均（854-12）mL,术区感染0例;住院时间3～8d,平均（5．5±1．6）d。患者随访3个月～5年,OVHR组复发2例（6．3％）,LVHR组复发3例（7．5％）。结论：LVHR同OVHR同样安全有效,但LVHR可明显降低切口感染并发症、减少术后疼痛、缩短术后住院时间。     

腹腔镜腹壁切口疝无张力修补术围手术期护理

<正>腹壁切口疝是经原腹壁手术切口突出于腹壁潜在间隙或薄弱区而形成的,切口感染及切口裂开是诸多引起切口疝因素中最重要的因素[1]。从传统疝修补到补片置入的无张力疝修补再到腹腔镜下无张力疝修补,治疗效果显著提高。腹腔镜手术治疗腹壁切口疝具有创伤小、康复快等优点,已成为治疗腹壁切口疝的首选治疗方式。2007年1月至2014     

切口疝的手术修补（编译）

重点分析剖腹和腹腔镜下网片修补切口疝的效果。通过大组多中心随机临床试验的资料，剖腹缝合的复发率为31％－49％，腹腔镜网片修补的复发率低至0％－9％。     

腹壁切口疝无张力修补术及围手术期处理

【摘要】 目的 总结采用人工材料无张力修补腹壁切口疝的临床经验和方法,探讨人工材料置于腹壁不同的层次对疗效的影响及围手术期处理。方法 回顾性分析90例腹壁切口疝的手术方法、 围手术期处理、术后并发症、引流的放置及随访结果。结果 90例患者疝补术后恢复顺利,无严重并发症, 无术后死亡。1例发生切口红肿伴脂肪液化,1例因脂肪液化再次复发。结论 采用人工材料行无张力疝修补是合适的治疗腹壁切口疝的方法,人工材料置于腹壁不同层次均可取得良好疗效,良好的围手术期处理是疗效的重要保证。     

补片修补切口疝

虽然有像Mudge和Hughes报告一个 10年的随访研究提示仅仅 1/ 3的手术切口疝出现症状和需要手术治疗 ,但手术切口疝嵌顿的发生率是 6%～ 15 % ,绞窄的发生率是 2 %。而且 ,手术切口疝具有明显的向病情加重发展和复发的趋势 ,尤其在年老、病态性肥胖和多次手术的病人。明确诊断后     

腹壁切口疝的腹腔镜修补与开放式手术的比较

<正>腹壁切口疝是腹内组织或器官经由手术切口的潜在间隙或薄弱区域突出于体表所形成的腹壁包块。其为手术造成的医源性疝,而手术修补是其唯一的治疗方法。直接修补     

切口疝的手术修补(编译)

重点分析剖腹和腹腔镜下网片修补切口疝的结果 ,通过大组多中心随机临床试验的资料 ,剖腹缝合的复发率为 3 1 %～ 49% ,腹腔镜网片修补的复发率低至 0 %～ 9%。     

开放式腹腔内修补治疗腹壁切口疝

目前常用的开放式腹壁切口疝修补手术有：(1)肌鞘前修补方法，即用单纯聚丙烯材料在腹壁脂肪与肌鞘(如腹直肌鞘)之间进行修补；(2)肌肉与肌肉(如中线切口裂开)之间的修补方法，通常采用聚四氟乙烯材料直接与腹壁缺损的边缘进行缝合修补；(3)肌后和腹膜外修补方法，一般采用聚丙烯材料或聚丙烯与聚四氟乙烯复合材料，在腹直肌肌肉与后鞘之间或腹直肌与腹膜之间对缺损进行修补：     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术的治疗体会(附12例报告)

目的:探讨腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术的手术方法、可行性及安全性。方法:回顾分析腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术12例的临床资料,包括患者年龄、性别,腹壁缺损的位置、大小,疝的内容物,修补网片的大小,手术时间,住院时间,术后并发症等。结果:手术时间50~125m in,平均80m in。术后住院时间为2~15d,平均3.5d。术后并发症发生率为8.3%,1例术后出现顽固性疼痛。平均随访32个月,术后未见复发。结论:腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补方法安全可行。     

Nuttall technique: A method for subumbilical incisional hernia repair revised

Background Large ventral incisional hernias are frequently repaired either by open or by laparoscopic mesh technique. The technique recommended by Nuttall has been used for the repair of large subumbilical incisional hernias but has not been popularized. Materials and methods From 1991 to 2005, 21 patients, mean age 64.6 ± 13 (44–86) years, underwent repair of large subumbilical incisional hernia with the Nuttall technique by which the rectus muscles are detached from the symphysis pubis and transposed to the opposite side. The exerted tension is minimal to the underlying tissues, and no prosthetic material is required to reinforce the abdominal wall. Results Morbidity was recorded in five patients (23.8%). The median follow-up time was 84 months, and the recurrence rate was 4.8% (one patient). Conclusions Although a small number of patients have undergone repair with the Nuttall technique, the long-term results of the method seem to be encouraging for the repair of large subumbulical incisional hernias.     

��ǻ���¸����п����޲���41����Ч����

目的评价腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术的长、短期疗效。方法回顾性分析2006年3月至2011年7月苏州大学附属第二医院普外科41例行腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术的临床资料。结果 41例切口疝均在腹腔镜下完成修补,手术时间45～150min,平均60min,术后住院时间3～16d,平均6d,术后随访2～65个月,平均25.6个月。发生血清肿4例,术后疼痛8例(术后3～6周缓解),补片感染1例,复发2例。结论腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术具有创伤小、恢复快、并发症少及复发率低等优点,是一种安全有效的手术方式。     

Laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair: A more effective alternative to conventional repair of recurrent incisional hernia

Conventional repair of recurrent ventral incisional hernia is associated with a higher recurrence rate (30%-50%) than repair of primary incisional hernia (11%-20%). Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair (LIHR) can significantly reduce the recurrence rate of primary hernia to less than 5%. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of repairing recurrent incisional hernia laparoscopically. One-hundred and seventy consecutive patients undergoing LIHR between January 1995 and December 2002 were prospectively reviewed. Patients with recurrent incisional hernia (n = 69) were compared to patients with primary incisional hernia (n = 101). Patient demographics and perioperative and postoperative data were recorded prospectively. Follow-up was obtained from office visits and telephone interviews. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test and the x ²test. Results are expressed as means ± standard deviation. The patients with recurrent incisional hernia had a mean of 1.9 ± 1.3 previous repairs, higher body mass index (BMI) (34 ± 6 kg/m² vs. 33 ± 8 kg/m², P = 0.46), larger defect size (123 ± 115 cm² vs. 101 ± 108 cm², P = 0.06), and longer operative time (119 ± 61 minutes vs. 109 ± 44 minutes, P= 0.11). The complication rate was higher in the recurrent group (28% vs. 11%, P = 0.01), but the recurrence rate was not different (7% vs. 5%, P= 0.53). The mean time to recurrence was significantly shorter in the recurrent group (3 ± 2 months vs. 14 ± 7 months, P < 0.0001). The mean follow-up interval was 19 ± 18 months in the recurrent group and 27 ± 20 months in the primary group. Although laparoscopic repair of recurrent incisional hernia resulted in a higher recurrence and complication rate than laparoscopic repair of primary incisional hernia, the rates were lower than those reported for conventional repair of recurrent incisional hernia. Laparoscopic repair of recurrent incisional hernia is an effective alternative to conventional repair. Supported in part by Tyco/US Surgical Corporation through an educational grant to the University of Kentucky Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery.     

CT在巨大切口疝患者疝修补术前渐进性气腹中的应用

目的探讨腹部CT在指导巨大切口疝患者行疝修补术前渐进性人工气腹（preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum,PPP）治疗中的价值。 方法选取2011年1月至2014年1月,湖北省枣阳市第一人民医院就诊的巨大切口疝患者10例进行回顾性分析。所有患者均接受腹部64排螺旋CT检查,通过CT影像确定疝囊与腹腔的上下、左右与前后径,按椭圆体体积公式计算疝囊与腹腔体积,并计算疝囊/腹腔体积比。将疝囊/腹腔体积比>25%的6例患者行疝修补术前PPP治疗,随后接受传统疝修补术。 结果术后共随访3年,10例患者中出现切口感染1例,切口疝复发1例,死亡1例,死因为慢性阻塞性肺疾病并发的呼吸衰竭。所有患者均未出现PPP导管相关并发症和腹腔内压增高相关并发症。 结论腹部CT在巨大切口疝的外科治疗中能提供有效的辅助作用,可准确的提供疝囊与腹腔体积的计算依据,为疝修补术前PPP治疗提供客观依据。     

Laparoscopic repair of ventral incisional hernia

Background : Laparoscopic repair of ventral incisional hernias was first reported in 1993. Since then, there have been sporadic case reports and small series published about this procedure, but it has not been widely adopted. Newer types of composite prosthetic mesh may reduce the potential problem of bowel adhesion. Methods : Thirty cases of laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repairs (carried out by two surgeons or their senior registrars) have been retrospectively reviewed and reported in this article. The data were obtained from patient records and subsequent phone surveys. Results : Thirty patients between 29 and 82 years (mean: 58 years) underwent this procedure. There were 14 men and 16 women. The average weight of the patients was 81 kg. The hernias were up to 6 or 7 cm in diameter. Mesh was used in 28 cases (polypropylene in 25 cases, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene in two cases and composite mesh in one case). Most meshes were laid intraperitoneally and fixed into position with laparoscopic spiral tacks. Twenty‐nine cases were completed laparoscopically. One operation (3.3%) was converted to an open procedure because of severe bowel adherence to the hernia sac. The mean operating time was 52 min for laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repairs only. All but two patients tolerated an oral diet within 24 h. The postoperative hospital stay ranged from 0 to 11 days, with 17 patients (57%) staying overnight and eight patients (27%) staying another day. Over 80% of the patients returned to house duties within a week. There was no mortality, and minor complications occurred in four patients (14%). One patient had a small bowel obstruction treated successfully by repeat laparoscopy with division of fibrinous adhesions to polypropylene mesh on day four. Follow up ranged from 1 to 69 months (mean: 12 months). One patient did not attend follow‐up appointments. There were three cases of hernia recurrence (10%). Conclusion : The results suggest that laparoscopic repair of ventral incisional hernias is a safe, effective and technically feasible operation for small‐ to medium‐sized hernias allowing shorter hospital stay, early recovery and resumption of normal activities. However, recurrence rates are comparable to open mesh hernioplasty especially for larger hernias.     

开放式完全腹腔内修补治疗巨大腹壁切口疝10例

目的探讨用Gore—Tex补片开放式完全腹腔内修补治疗巨大腹壁切口疝的疗效。方法用Gore．Tex补片开放式完全腹腔内修补治疗巨大腹壁切口疝10例，其中初发切口疝9例，复发切口疝1例。结果9例一期愈合，1例发生创面局限性积液，经穿刺负压引流处理后治愈，随访10个月至2年，无复发病例。结论用Gore—Tex补片开放式完全腹腔内修补治疗巨大腹壁切口疝经济，安全，有效，感染风险降低。     

腹腔镜切口疝修补术的临床疗效分析

目的:探讨腹腔镜切口疝修补术的手术操作方法、适应证及临床疗效。方法:回顾分析2012年4月至2014年6月为38例患者行腹腔镜切口疝修补术的临床资料。结果:38例手术均顺利完成,手术时间40～90 min,平均(56±6)min;术后排气时间12～48 h,术后住院(6.5±1.5)d。术后5例患者出现血清肿,进行2～3次抽液同时腹带加压包扎后血清肿消失,无肠梗阻、肠穿孔、切口感染等并发症发生。随访6～24个月,未出现切口疝复发。结论:腹腔镜切口疝修补术具有手术创伤小、术后康复快、并发症发生率及切口疝复发率低等优点,值得在临床推广应用。     

腹腔镜巨大切口疝修补术47例

目的探讨腹腔镜巨大切口疝修补术的治疗效果和技术要点。方法回顾性总结2004年3月至2009年6月间在我院进行的47例腹腔镜巨大切口疝修补术患者的资料,并对治疗效果和手术要点进行分析。结果术中2例（4.3%）患者因腹腔严重粘连中转开腹手术,其他患者均在腹腔镜下完成手术,肠管浆膜层损伤2例（4.3%）,手术时间平均为87±25min（56～145min）,无大出血病例。术后2例（4.3%）患者出现复发,1例进行了再次手术;34例患者（72.3%）有不同程度的术区腹壁疼痛,7例（14.9%）患者出现了不同程度的腹胀,但1～3个月后自行好转;2例（4.3%）患者术后出现了呼吸功能不全,经呼吸支持治疗后好转,2例（4.3%）患者出现了较明显的血清肿,经穿刺抽吸后好转。无术后出血、肠瘘或死亡病例。结论腹腔镜巨大切口疝修补术是安全、有效的术式。术中缝合、缩小疝环可以达到更加理想的治疗效果。