Mammography screening interval and the frequency of interval cancers in a population-based screening.

In a population-based mammography screening, 129,731 examinations were carried out among 36,000 women aged 40-74 in the city of Turku, Finland, in the period 1987-94. Women older than 50 were screened at 2-year intervals, and those younger than 50 at either 1-year or 3-year intervals, depending on their year of birth. Screen-detected breast cancers numbered 385 and, during the same time period, 154 women were diagnosed with breast cancer outside screening in the same age group in the same city, and 100 interval cancers were detected. Two hundred and fifty (67%) of the screen-detected cancers were of post-surgical stage I compared with 45 (45%) of the interval cancers and 52 (34%) of the cancers found outside screening (P<0.0001). However, among women aged 40-49 the frequency of stage I cancers did not differ significantly among screen-detected cancers, interval cancers and cancers found outside screening (50%, 42% and 44% respectively; P=0.73). Invasive interval cancers were more frequent among women aged 40-49 if screening was done at either 1-year (27%) or 3-year intervals (39%) than in older women screened at 2-year intervals (18%; P=0.08 and P=0.0009 respectively). Even if adjusted for the primary tumour size, screen-detected cancers had smaller S-phase fractions than interval cancers or control cancers (P=0.01), but no difference in the S-phase fraction size was found between cancers of women younger than 50 and those older than this (P=0.13). We conclude that more interval cancers were found among women younger than 50 than among those older than 50 and that this could not be explained by the rate of cancer cell proliferation.     

Phenotypic characterization and risk factors for interval breast cancers in a population-based breast cancer screening program in Barcelona,Spain

Objective  

To analyze phenotypic classification and other risk factors for interval breast cancer, focusing on true interval and false negative cancers.     

The need for supplemental breast cancer screening modalities: a perspective of population-based breast cancer screening programs in Japan

Purpose

This article discusses possible supplemental breast cancer screening modalities for younger women with dense breasts from a perspective of population-based breast cancer screening program in Japan.

Conclusion

Supplemental breast cancer screening modalities have been proposed to increase the sensitivity and detection rates of early stage breast cancer in women with dense breasts; however, there are no global guidelines that recommend the use of supplemental breast cancer screening modalities in such women. Also, no criterion standard exists for breast density assessment. Based on the current situation of breast imaging in Japan, the possible supplemental breast cancer screening modalities are ultrasonography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and breast magnetic resonance imaging. An appropriate population-based breast cancer screening program based on the balance between cost and benefit should be a high priority. Further research based on evidence-based medicine is encouraged. It is very important that the ethnicity, workforce, workflow, and resources for breast cancer screening in each country should be considered when considering supplemental breast cancer screening modalities for women with dense breasts.

     

Incidence of metachronous second primary cancers in Osaka, Japan: update of analyses using population-based cancer registry data

Cancer survivors are at excess risk of developing second primary cancers, but the precise level of risk in Japanese patients is not known. To investigate the risk of survivors developing second primary cancers, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Osaka Cancer Registry. The study subjects comprised all reported patients aged 0-79 years who were first diagnosed with cancer between 1985 and 2004 in Osaka and who survived for at least 3 months, followed-up through to December 2005. A metachronous second primary cancer was defined as any invasive second cancer that was diagnosed between 3 months and 10 years after the first cancer diagnosis. The main outcome measures were incidence rates per 100,000 person-years, cumulative risk and standardized incidence ratios (SIR) of second primary cancer. Metachronous second primary cancers developed in 13,385 of 355,966 survivors (3.8%) after a median follow-up of 2.5 years. Sex-specific incidence rates of metachronous second primary cancer per 100,000 person-years increased with age, and were higher among men than women (except for the 0-49 years age group), but these rates did not differ over the study period. The 10-year cumulative risk was estimated as 13.0% for those who first developed cancer at 60-69 years of age (16.2% for men, 8.6% for women). The SIR among those with first cancer diagnosed at 0-39 and 40-49 years of age were 2.13 and 1.52, respectively, in both sexes, whereas the SIR among cancers of the mouth/pharynx, esophagus and larynx were much higher than one as for site relationships. We showed that cancer survivors in Osaka, Japan, were at higher risk of second primary cancers compared with the general population. Our findings indicate that second primary cancers should be considered as a commonly encountered major medical problem. Further investigations are required to advance our understanding to enable the development of effective measures against multiple primary cancers.     

Age-specific trends of survival in metastatic breast cancer: 26 years longitudinal data from a population-based cancer registry in Stockholm,Sweden

Treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has evolved during the last decades but it is largely unknown whether this has led to improved survival in the general MBC population. Based on the regional, population-based breast cancer registry, we identified 5,463 patients diagnosed with MBC in Stockholm County during 1979–2004. Patients were divided into five cohorts based on the year of first MBC diagnosis and observed and relative survival were compared across the cohorts after adjustment for potential confounders. A significant trend of better survival over time was demonstrated for patients 60 years or younger (P < 0.001, by log-rank test for trend), but not for older patients (P = 0.12) or for the whole MBC population (P = 0.13). The adjusted observed survival of patients ≤60 years was significantly improved in the 2000–2004 cohort (P < 0.001, hazard ratio = 0.7, 95% confidence interval = 0.58–0.84), corresponding to a clinically significant increase of median survival with more than 3 months and absolute increase of 5-year survival with 8% or more compared to previous periods. Similarly, relative survival analysis indicated a 31% decreased mortality for the younger subpopulation in the 2000–2004 cohort (P < 0.001). Systemic adjuvant treatment was a negative prognostic factor after distant recurrence. Treatment advancements in MBC are not reflected by better survival for the whole MBC population. An improvement is only observed after the year 2000 and is restricted to younger patients.     

Age-specific norms and determinants of anxiety and depression in 731 women with breast cancer recruited through a population-based cancer registry

The aim of this study was to determine population norms and determinants of anxiety and depression in a population-based sample of 731 women with breast cancer (aged 23-60 years) with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS). The prevalence of 'probable' psychological morbidity due to anxiety was 23% and due to depression was 3%. When the women identified as 'possible' cases were included, the respective proportions were 45 and 12%. Higher anxiety was present in younger, less educated women not born in Australia. There was no clear pattern of risk factors for depression. These population-based findings highlight the need for clinicians to be aware that age, education and country of birth may identify a particularly vulnerable subgroup. While brief scales such as the HADS are limited in their ability to accurately predict a clinical diagnosis, high scores identify those who may warrant referral for clinical evaluation.     

Comparisons of interval breast cancers with other breast cancers detected through mass screening and in outpatient clinics in Japan

In a nation-wide collaborative study on mass screening for breast cancer, we collected 152 cases of interval breast cancer diagnosed at 35 hospitals or clinics distributed throughout Japan. The definition of interval breast cancer used in the present study is "breast cancer cases which were diagnosed as having 'no malignant findings' in a previous screening for breast cancer but subsequently diagnosed as 'breast cancer' at a hospital or medical clinic within two years of the previous screening." The clinical stages and prognoses of these interval cancer were analyzed and compared with those of other breast cancers detected through mass screening and in outpatient clinics. In the clinical staging of interval breast cancer, Tis (non infiltrating cancer) accounted for only 2.1%, compared to 8.0% in cases detected through mass screening. At stage I 43.4% were interval breast cancers compared to 32.9% breast cancers detected through mass screening and 25.4% diagnosed in outpatient clinics. The stage differences between interval breast cancers and breast cancers detected through mass screening were not statistically significant. Five-year survival rates were 85.6% for interval breast cancers, 91.7% for breast cancers detected through mass screening and 84.7% for breast cancers diagnosed in outpatient clinics. Ten-year survival rates were 75.9, 80.5 and 78.1%, respectively, suggesting the interval breast cancer cases to show a similar prognosis to that of breast cancer cases diagnosed in outpatient clinics. The differences in five- and 10-year survival rates among the three groups were not statistically significant. From the present study we were not able to confirm the general belief of interval cancer being more aggressive in nature and showing a poorer prognosis than cancer detected through periodic screening. The reasons for this are discussed.     

Age-specific sensitivities of mammographic screening for breast cancer

Summary The sensitivity of the mammographic screening test in the biennial screening program of Nijmegen is assessed by analyzing the occurrence of interval cancers, i.e. cancers surfacing clinically in the interval between a negative screening examination and the subsequent scheduled examination. The difference between the observed number of interval cancers and the expected number of clinically manifest cancers in the absence of screening for the interval period reflects the number of cancers detected by screening. The expected number should be limited by the number of those cancers that were not detectable at the time of the screening examination because their size was under the threshold of mammographic detectability (5 mm). In contrast to other sensitivity studies we took these fast growing cancers into consideration, the numbers of which are estimated in each of the six-month periods of the two-year interval using age-specific tumor volume growth rates for three age groups: < 50, 50–69, and 70 years. In patients under age 50, the sensitivity was 64% for cancers which would become clinically manifest within one year after screening. This sensitivity was lower than those obtained from the 50–69 and 70 age groups, being 85% and 80%, respectively. For cancers that would become clinically manifest 12–18 months after screening, sensitivity decreases to 22% in the under age 50 group, and to 56% and 65% in the two above age 50 groups, respectively. We conclude that even when adjusted for growth rate, the mammographic screening test has a poor performance in the under age 50 group.     

Small intestinal cancers among adults in an Egyptian district: A clinicopathological study using a population-based cancer registry

BackgroundSmall intestinal cancers (SICs) are very rare all over the world and little is known about them in Egypt.MethodsThis a retrospective study. Between 2000 and 2002, 30 cases with SICs were identified in the Gharbiah population based cancer registry (GPBCR); 17 cases of whom were treated at Tanta Cancer Center (TCC).ResultsThe median age was 51 years with female predominance. The duodenum was the commonest site (43%) followed by the ileum then the jejunum. Adenocarcinoma (AC), carcinoids, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), lymphoma and sarcoma represented 50%, 10%, 17%, 13% and 10% respectively. Abdominal pain was the commonest symptom and localized disease was the commonest presentation. Surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy were employed in 65%, 35% and 0% of patients, respectively. The median overall survival and progression free survival (OS, PFS) were 18 and 15 months (95% CI: 10.4–25.6 and 3.6–26.4), respectively. AC had inferior OS and PFS to other histologies (p = 0.08 and 0.12, respectively). Also, duodenum subsite was inferior in OS and PFS to other sites (p = 0.25 and 0.35, respectively).ConclusionsSICs in Gharbiah, Egypt are characterized by predominance of female gender and adenocarcinoma histology. One year survival is 64% with a poor outcome for adenocarcinoma and duodenal subsite.     

Radiological surveillance of interval breast cancers in screening programmes

Interval breast cancers-those diagnosed after a negative mammographic screen and before the next scheduled screen-are an important indicator of the potential effectiveness of population screening for breast cancer. Although the incidence of interval cancers is usually monitored, radiological surveillance is not undertaken routinely in most screening programmes. Here, we describe radiological surveillance of interval breast cancers and discuss methodological difficulties in the radiological review process and in the categorisation of interval cancers as false-negative, true, or occult. Furthermore, we identify methods that affect whether an interval cancer is classified as a false-negative (missed) or a true interval cancer. For all radiological categories of interval cancers, we outline possible changes to screening programmes that might improve cancer detection. Standardised radiological surveillance of interval cancers might allow within-programme comparisons and has the potential to guide practice and improve quality.     

Survival and age at diagnosis of breast cancer in a population-based cancer registry

From the population covered by the Lombardy Cancer Registry, Italy, 1991 female breast cancer patients diagnosed from 1976 to 1981 were followed up until May 1987. Relative survival was 69% at 5 years and 58% at 10 years; median survival was 8.8 years. Ages 40–49 showed the best survival; ages 25–34 were 20% lower. From age 50 onwards, survival decreased progressively, with the exception of age group 65–74. We suggest that the best prognosis for ages 40–49, followed by the survival fall in subsequent ages, could be related to an anticipation of diagnosis in ages near menopause. The death hazard function showed a bimodal pattern, with a first peak in the first years after diagnosis, and a second one between the seventh and eight years. The death hazard rate decreased by about 1% per year at each subsequent calendar year of diagnosis. When such an estimated calendar effect was taken in account, there were no considerable survival differences among Western countries covered by population-based cancer registries.     

Measuring interval cancers in population-based screening using different assays of fecal occult blood testing: the District of Florence experience

The fecal occult blood test (FOBT) has demonstrated its efficacy in reducing mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC). The guaiac-based FOBT has been criticized for its low sensitivity. In this study, two different assays for FOBT (guaiac or an immunochemical test based on reversed passive hemagglutination [RPHA]) were tested for comparison within a population-based screening program for colorectal cancer in the province of Florence (Italy). The proportional incidence method was used to calculate sensitivity for both FOBTs, according to rank of screening (first or repeat), age at entry (two groups of 50 to 59 and 60 to 70 years old) and lesion site (colon or rectum). When comparing FOBTs, the sensitivity multivariate Poisson regression was used to adjust for other variables. The sensitivity after the first 2 years was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI] 34% to 63%) for the guaiac test versus 82% (95% CI 67% to 92%) for RPHA. At multivariate analysis the risk of developing an interval cancer after a guaiac test is almost 3 times that after RPHA (rate ratio = 2.64; 95% CI 1.3 to 5.4). Our study confirms that RPHA is more sensitive than the guaiac test. The assumption that FOBT screening for CRC has to be based on a guaiac test should be reconsidered, and RPHA should be recommended as the standard FOBT for screening purposes.     

Differences in cancer survival by sex: a population-based study using cancer registry data

Purpose

Few large-scale studies have investigated sex differences in cancer survival and little is known about their temporal and age-related patterns.

Methods

We used cancer registry data for first primary cancers diagnosed between 1982 and 2015 in Victoria, Australia. Cases were followed until the end of 2015 through linkage to death registries. Differences in survival were assessed for 25 cancers using the Pohar-Perme estimator of net survival and the excess mortality rate ratio (EMRR) adjusting for age and year of diagnosis.

Results

Five-year net survival for all cancers combined was lower for men (47.1%; 95% CI 46.9–47.4) than women (52.0%; 95% CI 51.7–52.3); EMRR 1.13 (95% CI 1.12–1.14; p?<?0.001). A survival disadvantage for men was observed for 11 cancers: head and neck, esophagus, colorectum, pancreas, lung, bone, melanoma, mesothelioma, kidney, thyroid, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In contrast, women had lower survival from cancers of the bladder, renal pelvis, and ureter. For the majority of cancers with survival differences, the EMRR decreased with increasing age at diagnosis; for colorectal, esophageal, and kidney cancer, the EMRR increased with time since diagnosis.

Conclusion

Identifying the underlying reasons behind sex differences in cancer survival is necessary to address inequalities, which may improve outcomes for men and women.

     

Interval cancers in the Antwerp European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer study, using a 6 year screening interval

BackgroundThe European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC) was initiated to evaluate the effect of Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) screening on prostate cancer mortality. Variations in screening modalities between participating centres, such as the interval between screening rounds are likely to affect the outcome of screening.MethodsThe study describes the number and characteristics of interval cancers in men in the screening arm of the Antwerp ERSPC aged 55–65 years at the time of randomisation and participating in the screening rounds they were invited for. The interval between the first screening rounds was 6 years on average. Interval cancers were defined as cancers diagnosed during the screening interval but not detected by screening. Cases with a positive screening test were considered as interval cancers if diagnosis through biopsy occurred more than 1 year after screening. Interval cancer cases were identified through linkage with cancer registries. Aggressive interval cancer was defined as cancer with at least one of the following characteristics: stage M1 or N1, Gleason score higher than 7 or World Health Organisation (WHO) score of 3.ResultsThe 10 year cumulative incidence of interval cancers was 3.0% (n = 50) and the cumulative incidence of aggressive interval cancers was 0.5% (n = 8). During the first screening interval 36 interval cancers were detected. Of these 20 (55.6%) were detected more than 4 years after the initial screening and 5 (13.9%) were considered aggressive. All aggressive interval cancers emerged more than 4 years after initial screening.ConclusionThe occurrence of interval cancers in this study was higher than in the ERSPC centres that used a shorter screening interval. Aggressive interval cancers only started to emerge 4 years after initial screening.     

Tumor phenotype and breast density in distinct categories of interval cancer: results of population-based mammography screening in Spain

Introduction

Interval cancers are tumors arising after a negative screening episode and before the next screening invitation. They can be classified into true interval cancers, false-negatives, minimal-sign cancers, and occult tumors based on mammographic findings in screening and diagnostic mammograms. This study aimed to describe tumor-related characteristics and the association of breast density and tumor phenotype within four interval cancer categories.

Methods

We included 2,245 invasive tumors (1,297 screening-detected and 948 interval cancers) diagnosed from 2000 to 2009 among 645,764 women aged 45 to 69 who underwent biennial screening in Spain. Interval cancers were classified by a semi-informed retrospective review into true interval cancers (n = 455), false-negatives (n = 224), minimal-sign (n = 166), and occult tumors (n = 103). Breast density was evaluated using Boyd’s scale and was conflated into: <25%; 25 to 50%; 50 to 75%; >75%. Tumor-related information was obtained from cancer registries and clinical records. Tumor phenotype was defined as follows: luminal A: ER+/HER2- or PR+/HER2-; luminal B: ER+/HER2+ or PR+/HER2+; HER2: ER-/PR-/HER2+; triple-negative: ER-/PR-/HER2-. The association of tumor phenotype and breast density was assessed using a multinomial logistic regression model. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results

Forty-eight percent of interval cancers were true interval cancers and 23.6% false-negatives. True interval cancers were associated with HER2 and triple-negative phenotypes (OR = 1.91 (95% CI:1.22-2.96), OR = 2.07 (95% CI:1.42-3.01), respectively) and extremely dense breasts (>75%) (OR = 1.67 (95% CI:1.08-2.56)). However, among true interval cancers a higher proportion of triple-negative tumors was observed in predominantly fatty breasts (<25%) than in denser breasts (28.7%, 21.4%, 11.3% and 14.3%, respectively; <0.001). False-negatives and occult tumors had similar phenotypic characteristics to screening-detected cancers, extreme breast density being strongly associated with occult tumors (OR = 6.23 (95% CI:2.65-14.66)). Minimal-sign cancers were biologically close to true interval cancers but showed no association with breast density.

Conclusions

Our findings revealed that both the distribution of tumor phenotype and breast density play specific and independent roles in each category of interval cancer. Further research is needed to understand the biological basis of the overrepresentation of triple-negative phenotype among predominantly fatty breasts in true interval cancers.     

Rapid reporting of cancer incidence in a population-based study of breast cancer: one constructive use of a central cancer registry

Summary To support a study of genetic risk factors for breast cancer, the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry has implemented a rapid reporting procedure for hospitals in the study area. This system permits the identification of newly diagnosed breast cancer cases within a very short time period (less than one month). The procedures are straightforward, cost-effective, and greatly benefit the objectives of tissue collection and interviews with the cases. This article describes the rapid reporting procedures and their potential impact for population-based research. For the objective of making generalizable risk statements, the necessity of population-based research is stressed; participation with central cancer registries is endorsed for this and other molecular epidemiologic applications.     

Prognosis of 6644 resected non-small cell lung cancers in Japan: a Japanese lung cancer registry study

For the scheduled future revision of the TNM staging system for lung cancer, it is important that the present 1997 version be evaluated in a large population. In 2001, the Japanese Joint Committee of Lung Cancer Registry sent a questionnaire to 320 Japanese institutions regarding the prognosis and clinicopathological profiles of patients who underwent the resection for primary lung neoplasms in 1994. We compiled the data for 7408 patients from 303 institutions (94.7%). Among these, 6644 patients with non-small cell histology were studied in terms of prognosis. The 5-year survival rate of the entire group was 52.6%. The 5-year survival rates by clinical (c-) stage were as follows: 72.1% for IA (n = 2423), 49.9% for IB (n = 1542), 48.7% for IIA (n = 150), 40.6% for IIB (n = 746), 35.8% for IIIA (n = 1270), 28.0% for IIIB (n = 366) and 20.8% for IV (n = 147). The difference in prognosis between neighboring stages was significant except for between IB and IIA and between IIIB and IV. The 5-year survival rates by pathological (p-) stage were as follows: 79.5% for IA (n = 2009), 60.1% for IB (n = 1418), 59.9% for IIA (n = 232), 42.2% for IIB (n = 757), 29.8% for IIIA (n = 1250), 19.3% for IIIB (n = 719) and 20.0% for IV (n = 259). The difference in prognosis between neighboring stages was significant except for between IB and IIA and between IIIB and IV. The survival curves of stages IB and IIA were almost superimposed in both c- and p-settings. These findings indicated that the present stages IB and IIA should be merged into the same stage category. Otherwise, the present TNM staging system seemed to well characterize the stage-specific prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer. The future revision should focus on the subdivision of stages I and II.