噻托溴铵联合沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松治疗稳定期COPD的临床效果

目的探讨噻托溴铵联合沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松联合治疗稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的临床效果。方法采用随机的方法将93例稳定期COPD患者分为观察组(47例)和对照组(46例),两组均予常规基础治疗,观察组给予沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松(50μg/500μg,2次/d)联合噻托溴铵(18μg,1次/d)吸入治疗,对照组给予沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松(50μg/500μg,2次/d)单独吸入治疗,疗程为9个月。观察患者治疗前与治疗后12、24、36周运动耐量、呼吸困难评分以及肺功能的变化。结果治疗后两组患者6min步行距离(6MWD)值、肺功能均有显著增加(P0.05),呼吸困难评分(MRC)均有显著下降(P0.05),而观察组各项指标改善明显优于对照组(P0.05)。结论沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松单用可有效缓解稳定期COPD患者的临床症状、改善肺功能。而沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松联合噻托溴铵在减轻患者临床症状,改善肺功能上的作用更为显著,值得临床推广应用。     

沙美特罗丙酸氟替卡松对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者临床疗效及对免疫功能的影响

目的探讨沙美特罗丙酸氟替卡松治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(简称慢阻肺)患者的临床疗效及其对免疫功能的影响。方法将100例慢阻肺患者随机分为观察组和对照组各50例。对照组采用常规治疗,观察组在此基础上给予沙美特罗丙酸氟替卡松吸入治疗。观察两组治疗后21天的临床疗效及治疗前后免疫功能指标变化。结果治疗组的有效率为96.00%明显高于对照组的有效率84.00%,差异有明显的统计学意义(P0.05),并且治疗后观察组CD+3,CD+4和CD+4/CD+8水平明显高于对照组,而CD+8水平明显低于对照组水平,差异有显著的统计学意义(P0.01),而Ig G,Ig A,Ig M水平治疗后两组无明显的统计学差异(P0.05)。结论沙美特罗丙酸氟替卡松治疗慢阻肺疗效确切,可改善患者免疫功能,值的临床推广应用。     

吸入不同剂量沙美特罗/氟替卡松治疗稳定期COPD的疗效

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患病率和病死率呈逐年升高趋势,严重威胁患者的劳动能力和生活质量〔1〕。舒利迭已经成为稳定期COPD治疗的一线用药,临床上提倡COPD患者吸入50/500的剂型,而另有认为50/250也可以用于COPD稳定期的治疗。本文观察两种剂型对COPD的影响。     

沙美特罗替卡松治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期临床观察

目的 观察沙美特罗替卡松干粉吸入剂对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的疗效及安全性.方法 将76饲COPD患者随机分为两组.对照组38例口服氨茶碱,3次/d,0.1g/次;治疗组38例吸入沙美特罗替卡松干粉剂,2次/d,1吸/次,疗程为半年.观察两组患者治疗前后肺功能变化.结果 治疗后,治疗组肺功能指标明显优于对照组.结论 沙美特罗替卡松干粉吸入能够改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病的肺功能.     

布地奈德/福莫特罗、沙美特罗/氟替卡松治疗中重度稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病疗效观察

目的比较长期联合吸入布地奈德/福莫特罗和沙美特罗/氟替卡松对中重度稳定期COPD病人的肺功能、生活质量的影响。方法 60例中重度稳定期COPD病人随机分为规律吸入布地奈德/福莫特罗（160μg/4.5μg）20例,规律吸入沙美特罗/氟替卡松（50μg/250μg）20例,按需吸入特布他林组20例（对照组）。测定三组试验前及试验后6个月圣·乔治（St·George）呼吸疾病问卷（SGRQ）的评分、6分钟行走距离（6-MWD）、肺功能。结果布地奈德/福莫特罗组与沙美特罗/氟替卡松组治疗后较对照组生活质量改善、6-MWD增加、肺功能改善,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;布地奈德/福莫特罗组与沙美特罗/氟替卡松组间比较,差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论与沙美特罗/氟替卡松一样,规律吸入布地奈德/福莫特罗能改善中重度稳定期COPD病人的临床症状、运动耐力和肺功能。     

噻托溴铵联合沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期患者的疗效观察

目的 观察沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松(舒利迭)联合噻托溴铵粉吸入剂(思力华)对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)缓解期的治疗效果.方法 采用随机、双肓的方法将85例COPD患者分为观察组和对照组,观察组A组给予噻托溴铵和沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松治疗,对照组B组给予沙美特罗/内酸氟替卡松治疗.分别对两组患者治疗前后的呼吸困难的评分、...     

噻托溴铵和沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松治疗老年COPD临床研究

2006年初在我国上市的噻托溴铵是用于治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的新型抗胆碱能药物吸入剂,因其对气道M3受体的特异阻断作用而具有长效扩张支气管效应.     

系统评价沙美特罗/替卡松(丙酸氟替卡松)联用噻托溴铵治疗中、重度慢性阻塞性肺病的临床疗效和安全性

目的系统评价沙美特罗/替卡松(丙酸氟替卡松)联用噻托溴铵治疗中、重度慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的临床疗效和安全性。方法计算机检索Pub Med、Ovid、CNKI、VIP、CBM、万方等数据库内有关沙美特罗/替卡松(丙酸氟替卡松)联用噻托溴铵,简称联合用药,与单用沙美特罗/替卡松(丙酸氟替卡松)或单用噻托溴铵治疗中、重度COPD的随机对照研究,检索年限为2000年1月至2014年7月,对纳入研究进行文献质量评价,采用Rev Man 5.2统计软件对结果进行分析。结果共纳入35篇文献,其中33篇为中文,2篇为英文,合计2 847例患者。Meta分析显示,联合用药对中、重度COPD患者肺功能、临床症状和生活质量的改善均优于单用沙美特罗/替卡松(沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松),除尚不能确定联合用药在降低动脉血二氧化碳分压(Pa CO2)优于单用噻托溴铵外,在肺功能、动脉血氧分压(Pa O2)和生活质量的改善也优于单用噻托溴铵。联合用药并没有增加不良反应的发生率,也没有加重不良反应的损害程度。结论沙美特罗/替卡松(丙酸氟替卡松)联用噻托溴铵治疗中、重度COPD是安全有效的。     

沙美特罗替卡松对重度COPD患者的疗效观察

目的观察长期吸入沙美特罗替卡松对稳定期重度COPD患者肺功能、血气指标、TNF-α及生活质量等的影响。方法选取在我院治疗的78例重度COPD患者随机分为对照组39例、试验组39例。对照组口服茶碱缓释胶囊并按需使用短效支扩剂;试验组在此基础上给予沙美特罗替卡松(50/500μg)吸入治疗。对两组治疗1个月、6个月的肺功能指标、血气指标、痰液TNF-α水平及SGRQ评分改善进行统计比较。结果试验组6个月后FEV1及FEV1/FVC较对照组有明显改善;试验组呼吸困难明显改善;治疗后1个月、6个月时试验组的血气、肺功能指标及SGRQ评分结果均优于对照组,而试验组痰液TNF-α水平均低于对照组,有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论沙美特罗替卡松吸入治疗稳定期重度COPD,能够显著改善肺功能,明显缓解临床症状,显著提高患者生活质量。     

吸入不同剂量沙美特罗/氟替卡松对稳定期COPD的临床疗效分析

目的研究吸入不同剂量的沙美特罗/氟替卡松(舒利迭)对稳定期COPD的临床治疗效果以指导用药。方法选取我院住院的168例稳定期COPD患者作为研究对象随机分为四组。四组患者给予基础治疗稳定病情后,再分别吸入舒利迭50/500μg、舒利迭50/250μg、沙美特罗50μg、丙酸氟替卡松500μg,持续用药8个月,比较治疗前及治疗后患者的肺功能及临床症状。结果治疗后患者肺功能及临床症状好转,舒利迭(50/500μg)组尤为突出。结论舒利迭对稳定期COPD有较好的疗效,能改善患者的肺功能及临床症状,尤以舒利迭(50/500μg)效果显著。     

噻托溴铵联合沙美特罗替卡松治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期患者的疗效观察

目的 观察噻托溴铵联合沙美特罗替卡松对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)稳定期的治疗效果.方法 采用随机、双盲的方法将62例COPD患者分为观察组和对照组,观察组给予噻托溴铵和沙美特罗替卡松治疗,对照组给予沙美特罗替卡松治疗,分别对两组患者治疗前后呼吸困难评分和肺功能检测进行比较.结果 治疗两个月后,与对照组比较观察组肺功能FEV1、FVC、FEV1/FVC%,呼吸困难评分改善差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论 噻托溴铵与沙美特罗替卡松联合吸入治疗COPD,疗效优于沙美特罗替卡松单药治疗.     

不同剂量沙美特罗替卡松在慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期中的疗效对比研究

目的探讨不同剂量沙美特罗替卡松在慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期中的疗效。方法选取2008年1月—-2010年2月于我院进行治疗的117例慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者为研究对象，将患者随机分为A组（舒利迭50／250μg剂型组）39例和B组（舒利迭50／500μg剂型组）39例，C组（万托林联合茶碱缓释片组）39例，后将A、B及C组治疗总有效率及治疗3个月及1年时的血气、血流变、肺功能指标、血清ET-1、IL-1β、NO的水平及6min步行距离进行统计及比较。结果经研究比较发现，B组的治疗总有效率高于A组及c组，治疗后3个月及1年时B组的血气、血流变、肺功能指标及6min步行距离的评价结果均优于A组及c组，而B组血清ET-1、IL一1β、NO水平均低于A组及C组，均有显著性差并，且B组患者在1年的疗程中急性加重的次数要低于A组及C组。结论大剂量沙美特罗替卡松在慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期中的综合效果要优于小剂量，值得临床推广应用。     

沙美特罗替卡松联合噻托溴铵吸入治疗中重度COPD 40例疗效观察

目的观察沙美特罗替卡松（舒利迭）联合噻托溴铵粉吸入剂（思力华）对中重度COPD的治疗效果。方法将40例临床诊断为中重度COPD的患者随机分为两组。A组：22例,舒利迭（50/500 ug）吸人,每天2次,加用思力华,使用吸入装置（HandiHaler）吸入,每次1粒胶囊（18 ug）,每天1次。B组：18例,单纯舒利迭（50/500 ug）吸人,每天2次.疗程3个月。观察两组患者治疗前后呼吸困难的评分、血气分析及肺功能情况。结果治疗3个月后,所有患者呼吸困难均减轻,但A组呼吸困难下降值明显高于B组（P〈0.001）。与B组比较,治疗后A组肺功能指标（FVC、FEV1及FEV1/FVC）及血气指标（SaO2、PaO2）明显升高,而PaCO2则明显下降（P〈0.01）。结论长效抗胆碱药噻托溴铵与舒利迭联合应用可明显改善中重度COPD患者的呼吸困难、血气和肺功能,优于单纯应用舒利迭,可使COPD得到良好的控制。     

噻托溴胺对慢性阻塞性肺疾病稳定期患者生存质量的评价

目的观察中度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)稳定期吸入噻托溴胺的临床疗效。方法将40例中度COPD(Ⅱ～Ⅲ级)稳定期患者随机分为2组,治疗组(噻托溴铵组)(n=20,思力华,Boehinger Ingelheim,18ug,1次/d,早晨给药)和对照组(n=20,按需使用短效抗胆碱能支气管扩张剂),整个观察期为1年,观察2组用药3个月、6个月和1年后肺功能的变化以及StGeorge′s呼吸问卷(SGRQ)等情况,通过6min步行试验(6MWT)观察运动耐力的变化以及随访3～12个月急性加重的例次及住院例次。结果用药3个月后治疗组FEV1、FVC、FEV1/FVC及FEV1占预计值(%)比对照组明显改善,2组比较差异有显著性(P0.05),治疗组运动耐力(6MWT)增加,SGRQ评分比较治疗组明显下降,随访3～12个月治疗组急性加重例次明显减少,与对照组比较差异有显著性(P0.05);治疗组用药后3个月、6个月和1年后肺功能比较无显著差异(P0.05)。结论吸入噻托溴胺可以改善稳定期(Ⅱ～Ⅲ级)COPD患者肺功能与运动耐力,减少急性加重的发作,改善生活质量,不良反应少,使用方便,值得临床广泛推广。     

Effect of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (250/50 microg) or salmeterol (50 microg) on COPD exacerbations

OBJECTIVES: COPD exacerbations are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study evaluated the effect of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 and salmeterol 50 microg twice daily on moderate to severe exacerbations. METHODS: Patients received standardized treatment with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 during a 1-month run-in, followed by randomization to fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 or salmeterol for 12 months. Moderate to severe exacerbations were defined as worsening symptoms of COPD requiring treatment with oral corticosteroids, antibiotics, or hospitalization. RESULTS: In 782 patients with COPD (mean FEV(1)=0.94+/-0.36 L, 33% predicted normal), treatment with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 significantly reduced (1) the annual rate of moderate to severe exacerbations by 30.5% compared with salmeterol (1.06 and 1.53 per subject per year, respectively, p<0.001), (2) the risk of time to first exacerbation by 25% (hazard ratio=0.750, p=0.003) and (3) the annual rate of exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids by 40% (p<0.001). Clinical improvements observed during run-in treatment with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 were better maintained over 12 months with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 than salmeterol. Adverse events were reported for a similar percentage of subjects across groups. A higher reporting of pneumonia was observed with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 than salmeterol (7% vs. 4%). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 is more effective than salmeterol at reducing the rate of moderate to severe exacerbations over 1 year. The benefits of this reduction relative to the risk of a higher incidence of reported pneumonia should be considered. This study supports the use of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 for the reduction of COPD exacerbations in patients with COPD.     

Lung function and symptom improvement with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol and ipratropium bromide/albuterol in COPD: response by beta-agonist reversibility

This retrospective analysis of data from two multi-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel group studies compared the efficacy of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FSC) 250/50 mcg twice daily with ipratropium bromide/albuterol (IB/ALB) 36/206 mcg four times daily in albuterol-reversible (n=320 [44%]) and non-reversible (n=399 [56%]) patients with COPD. In reversible and non-reversible patients, both treatments significantly increased FEV(1)AUC(0-6h) from baseline and the magnitude of improvement was larger in reversible patients. FSC increased FEV(1)AUC(0-6h) by 1.46+/-0.08 and 1.98+/-0.13 l-h at Day 1 and Week 8, respectively, in reversible patients, compared with 0.71+/-0.06 and 0.94+/-0.10 l-h in non-reversible patients (p<0.001). With IB/ALB, increases were 1.46+/-0.08 and 1.19+/-0.11 l-h at Day 1 in reversible patients and Week 8, respectively, and 0.89+/-0.06 and 0.74+/-0.09 l-h (p < or = 0.041) in non-reversible patients. After 8 weeks, in both the reversible and non-reversible populations, the FEV(1) AUC(0-6h) significantly increased with FSC treatment (p < or = 0.002) and significantly decreased with IB/ALB (p < or = 0.010). In both reversibility groups, improvement in Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) scores, overall daytime diary symptom scores and nocturnal symptom measures were significantly greater with FSC treatment compared with IB/ALB (p < or = 0.044). Reversibility status was not predictive of the magnitude of reduction in symptom scores. We conclude that both reversible and non-reversible patients receive greater clinical benefit with FSC compared with IB/ALB and acute bronchodilator reversibility is not useful for differentiating patients based on symptomatic responses to FSC compared with IB/ALB.     

Rationale and design of the Early Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (ECOPD) study in Guangdong,China: a prospective observational cohort study

BackgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease and its clinically relevant subtypes are not well understood. Which clinical characteristics are more likely to be present among individuals who develop COPD remains to be studied in depth. Therefore, we designed a prospective observational cohort study, entitled the Early Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (ECOPD) study, to fill this evidence gap. The ECOPD study has four specific aims: (I) identification of characteristics, parameters, and biomarkers that may predict the development of airflow obstruction and annual decline in lung function with normal spirometry; (II) identification of clinically relevant early COPD subtypes; (III) identification of characteristics, parameters, and biomarkers that may predict disease progression in these early COPD subtypes; (IV) development and validation of machine learning models to predict development of airflow obstruction and disease progression.MethodsWe will recruit approximately 2,000 participants aged 40–80 years, including approximately 1,000 with COPD [post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) <0.7] and approximately 1,000 without COPD, using a population-based survey for COPD. We will assess all participants using standard respiratory epidemiological questionnaires, pulmonary function tests [pre-bronchodilator and post-bronchodilator spirometry, and impulse oscillometry (IOS)], health outcomes [modified British Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, COPD assessment test (CAT), COPD clinical questionnaire (CCQ)], inspiratory and expiratory chest computed tomography (CT), and biomarker measurements (blood and urine), as well as satellite remote sensing pollutant exposure measures. Subgroup will additionally complete induced sputum, exercise capacity tests [6-minute walk test (6MWT) and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET)] and home monitoring/personal sampling as pollutant exposure measures. Study procedures will be performed at baseline and every 1 year thereafter.DiscussionThe ECOPD study will provide insight into many aspects of early COPD and improve our understanding of COPD development, which may facilitate therapeutic interventions with the potential to modify the course of disease.Trial RegistrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900024643. Registered on 19 July, 2019.     

沙美特罗替卡松粉联合噻托溴铵治疗慢性阻塞性肺病稳定期C组患者的临床疗效观察

目的 观察吸入不同剂量沙美特罗替卡松粉（舒利迭）联合噻托溴铵治疗慢性阻塞性肺病（COPD）稳定期C组患者的疗效.方法 门诊选取72例COPD稳定期C组患者,随机分成3组,Ⅰ组单独吸入舒利迭（50μg沙美特罗/500 μg丙酸氟替卡松,2次/日）、Ⅱ组单独吸入噻托溴铵（18μg,1次/日）和Ⅲ组吸入舒利迭（50μg沙美特罗/250 μg丙酸氟替卡松,2次/日）＋噻托溴铵（18μg,1次/日）,共治疗12周.用药前后分别检测患者肺功能,应用改良的英国医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表（mMRC）进行评分、COPD评估测试（CAT）及6分钟步行试验（6MWT）.结果 Ⅰ、Ⅲ组患者肺功能指标、mMRC及CAT评分、6分钟步行距离均较治疗前明显改善（P＜0.05）;Ⅱ组患者肺功能指标改善不明显,6分钟步行距离、mMRC及CAT评分均较前改善（P＜0.05）.结论 沙美特罗替卡松粉（50 μg/250 μg,2次/日）联合噻托溴铵治疗COPD稳定期C组患者疗效确切,治疗风险未增加,值得临床推广.     

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Depressive Symptoms in Persons with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Background  Although depression is a risk factor for adverse outcomes in chronic illness, little is known about the prevalence or risk factors for depressive symptoms in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Objective  To determine the prevalence of depressive symptoms in COPD as compared to other chronic illnesses and to identify risk factors for depressive symptoms in COPD. Design and Patients  Cross-sectional study of 18,588 persons (1,736 subjects with self-reported COPD), representing a sample of the US population aged ≥50 years who participated in the 2004 Health and Retirement Survey. Measurements  Presence of COPD and other chronic conditions was defined by self-report. Presence of depressive symptoms was assessed using the CES-D8 scale. Participants with a score ≥3 on CES-D8 were classified as having clinically significant depressive symptoms. Main Results  Of 1,736 participants with COPD, 40% had ≥3 depressive symptoms. Depressive symptoms were more common in COPD than in coronary heart disease, stroke, diabetes, arthritis, hypertension, and cancer. Risk factors for ≥3 depressive symptoms in COPD: younger age (OR 1.02/per year younger, 95% CI [1.02–1.03]), female gender (1.2 [1.1–1.3]), current smoking (1.5 [1.3–1.7]), marital status [divorced/separated (1.8 [1.6–2.1]), widowed (1.8 [1.6–2]), never married (1.4 [1.1–1.8]), ≤high school degree (1.6 [1.5–1.8]), dyspnea (2.3 [2.1–2.6]), difficulty walking (2.8 [2.5–3.2]), and co-morbid diabetes (1.2 [1.1–1.4]), arthritis (1.3 [1.2–1.5]) or cancer (1.2 [1.1–1.4]). Conclusions  Depressive symptoms are common in COPD and are more likely to occur in COPD than in other common chronic illnesses. The risk factors identified may be used for targeted depression screening in COPD patients. An erratum to this article can be found at