Biomechanical comparison of different graft positions for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Purpose

Recent reports have highlighted the importance of an anatomic tunnel placement for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of different tunnel positions for single-bundle ACL reconstruction on knee biomechanics.

Methods

Sixteen fresh-frozen cadaver knees were used. In one group (n = 8), the following techniques were used for knee surgery: (1) anteromedial (AM) bundle reconstruction (AM–AM), (2) posterolateral (PL) bundle reconstruction (PL–PL) and (3) conventional vertical single-bundle reconstruction (PL-high AM). In the other group (n = 8), anatomic mid-position single-bundle reconstruction (MID–MID) was performed. A robotic/universal force-moment sensor system was used to test the knees. An anterior load of 89 N was applied for anterior tibial translation (ATT) at 0°, 15°, 30° and 60° of knee flexion. Subsequently, a combined rotatory load (5 Nm internal rotation and 7 Nm valgus moment) was applied at 0°, 15°, 30° and 45° of knee flexion. The ATT and in situ forces during the application of the external loads were measured.

Results

Compared with the intact ACL, all reconstructed knees had a higher ATT under anterior load at all flexion angles and a lower in situ force during the anterior load at 60° of knee flexion. In the case of combined rotatory loading, the highest ATT was achieved with PL-high AM; the in situ force was most closely restored with MIDMID, and the in situ force was the highest AM–AM at each knee flexion angle.

Conclusion

Among the techniques, AM–AM afforded the highest in situ force and the least ATT.     

Biomechanics of the porcine triple bundle anterior cruciate ligament

Several species of animals are used as a model to study human anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. In many animals, three bundles were clearly discernible during dissection in the ACL. However, there are few reports about the biomechanical role of each bundle in the porcine knee. The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of each of the three bundles in the porcine knee, especially the intermediate bundle. Ten porcine knees were tested using a robotic/universal forcemoment sensor system. This system applied anterior loading of 89 N at 30°, 60° and 90° of flexion, and a combined 7 Nm valgus and 4 Nm internal tibial torque at 30° and 60° of flexion before and after each bundle was selectively cut. The in situ force (N) for each bundle of the ACL was measured. Both intermediate (IM) bundle and postero-lateral (PL) bundle had significantly lower in situ force than the antero-medial (AM) bundle in anterior loading. The IM and PL bundles carried a larger proportion of the force under the torsional loads than the anterior loads. But IM bundle had a significant lower in situ force during the combined torque at 60° of knee flexion, when compared intact ACL. In summary, IM bundle has a subordinate role to the AM and PL bundles. AM bundle is more dominant than IM and PL bundles. The porcine knee is a suitable model for ACL studies, especially for AP stability.     

ACL mismatch reconstructions: influence of different tunnel placement strategies in single-bundle ACL reconstructions on the knee kinematics

To evaluate the influence of tibial and femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction on knee kinematics, we compared ACL reconstruction with a tibial and femoral tunnel in anteromedial (AM-AM reconstruction) and in posterolateral footprint (PL-PL reconstruction) with a reconstruction technique with tibial posterolateral and femoral anteromedial tunnel placement (PL-AM reconstruction). In 9 fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees, the knee kinematics under simulated Lachman (134 N anterior tibial load) and a simulated pivot shift test (10 N/m valgus and 4 N/m internal tibial torque) were determined at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. Kinematics were recorded for intact, ACL-deficient, and single-bundle ACL reconstructed knees using three different reconstruction strategies in randomized order: (1) PL-AM, (2) AM-AM and (3) PL-PL reconstructions. Under simulated Lachman test, single-bundle PL-AM reconstruction and PL-PL reconstructions both showed significantly increased anterior tibial translation (ATT) at 60° and 90° when compared to the intact knee. At all flexion angles, AM-AM reconstruction did not show any statistical significant differences in ATT compared to the intact knee. Under simulated pivot shift, PL-AM reconstruction resulted in significantly higher ATT at 0°, 30°, and 60° knee flexion and AM-AM reconstructions showed significantly higher ATT at 30° compared to the intact knee. PL-PL reconstructions did not show any significant differences to the intact knee. AM-AM reconstructions restore the intact knee kinematics more closely when compared to a PL-AM technique resembling a transtibial approach. PL-PL reconstructions showed increased ATT at higher flexion angles, however, secured the rotational stability at all flexion angles. Due to the independent tibial and femoral tunnel location, a medial portal technique may be superior to a transtibial approach.     

The effect of intra-operative knee flexion angle on determination of graft location in the anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Graft tunnel placement is the factor with most influence on the outcome of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However the final decision for the graft location has to be decided subjectively under arthroscopy, and can be misplaced due to the effect of the knee flexion angle. The displacement of the estimated placement by surgeons from the ACL anatomical attachment is due to the knee’s differing knee flexion angle. Eight cadaveric knees and an electromagnetic position recording system were employed. After digitizing the anatomical location of AM and PL bundle center, four experienced surgeons estimated the graft placement repeatedly at 70°, 90° and 110° of knee flexion. The displacements between these two positions were calculated and analyzed separately in antero-posterior and disto-proximal directions. The displacements of the estimated AM bundle placements were 4.7 ± 3.4 mm at 70°, 4.3 ± 2.2 mm at 90°, and 6.0 ± 2.6 mm at 110°, while those of the PL bundle were 4.0 ± 2.2 mm at 70°, 3.4 ± 1.9 mm at 90°, and 4.2 ± 2.5 mm at 110°. The best results were obtained at 90° of knee flexion. Additionally, the estimated placements for both AM and PL bundle were located more distally as the flexion angle increased. Our results imply that the knee should be set at 90° when determining the graft placement in double-bundle reconstruction to prevent misplacement of the graft usually in a disto-proximal direction.     

The effect of notchplasty in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study in the porcine knee

Introduction

Notchplasty is frequently performed by many orthopaedic surgeons during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The effect of notchplasty on tunnel placement and knee biomechanics with ACL reconstruction is not known.

Methods

Twelve (n = 12) porcine knees were tested using a robotic testing system. Four knee states were compared: (1) intact ACL, (2) ACL-deficient, (3) anatomic single bundle (SB) ACL reconstruction and (4) anatomic SB ACL reconstruction with a 5-mm notchplasty. The graft was fixed at 60° of flexion (full extension of porcine knee is 30°) with an 80-N tension. The knees were subjected to two loading conditions: an 89-N anterior tibial load (ATT) and 4 Nm internal (IR) and external tibial (ER) rotational torques. The kinematics and in situ force obtained from the different knee conditions were compared.

Results

There were no significant differences between pre- and post-notchplasty in the ER at 30° and 60° of knee flexion (n.s.). However, a significant difference was found between pre- and post-notchplasty in ATT at 30° and 60° of flexion (p < 0.05). The in situ force in the anatomic SB reconstruction with notchplasty was significant lower than the intact and anatomic reconstructed ACL pre-notchplasty at 30°, 60° and 90° of knee flexion (p < 0.05). In response to the IR tibial torque, there were significant differences between pre- and post-notchplasty in IR at 60° (p < 0.05) of knee flexion.

Conclusion

Notchplasty had greater effect on anterior stability than rotational stability. This change in knee kinematics could be detrimental to a healing bone graft, ligamentization and could lead to failure of the reconstruction in early post-operative period.     

Biomechanics of the goat three bundle anterior cruciate ligament

The goat is a widely used animal model for basic research on the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), but the biomechanical role of the different bundles [intermediate (IM), anteromedial (AM), posterolateral (PL)] of the ACL is unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study is to describe the biomechanical function of the different bundles and evaluate its use for a double bundle ACL reconstruction model. A CASPAR Stäubli RX90 robot with a six degree-of-freedom load cell was used for measurement of anterior tibial translation (ATT) (mm) and in situ forces (N) at 30° (full extension), 60°, 90° as well as rotational testing at 30° in 14 paired goat knees before and after each bundle was cut. When the AM-bundle was cut, the ATT increased significantly at 60° and 90° of flexion (p < 0.05). When the PL-bundle was cut, the ATT increased only at 30°. However, most load was transferred through the big AM-bundle while the PL-bundle shared significant load only at 30°, with only minimal contribution from the IM-bundle at all flexion degrees. The observed biomechanical results in this study are similar to the human ACL observed previously in the literature. Though anatomically discernible, the IM-bundle plays only an inferior role in ATT and might be neglected as a separate bundle during reconstruction. The goat ACL shows some differences to the human ACL, whereas the main functions of the ACL bundles are similar.     

Effect of knee flexion on the in situ force distribution in the human anterior cruciate ligament

This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of applied load on the magnitude, direction, and point of tibial intersection of the in situ forces of the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bands of the human anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) at 30° and 90° of knee flexion. An Instron was used to apply a 100 N anterior shear force to 11 human cadaver knees, 6 at 30° of knee flexion and 5 at 90° of knee flexion. A Universal Force Sensor (UFS) recorded the resultant 6 degree-of freedom (DOF) forces/moments. Each specimen then underwent serial removal of the AM and PL bands. With the knee limited to 1 DOF (anteroposterior), tests were performed before and after each structure was removed. Because the path was identical in each test, the principle of superposition was applied. Thus, the difference between the resultant forces could be attributed to the force carried by the structure just removed. The magnitudes of force in the ACL at 30° and 90° of knee flexion were 114.1±7.4 N and 90.8±8.3 N, respectively (P<0.05). At 30°, the AM and PL bundles carried 95% and 4% of the total ACL force, respectively. At 90°, the AM and PL bands carried 85% and 13%, respectively (P<0.05). The direction of the in situ force in the whole ACL as well as its two bands correlated with the anatomic orientation of the ligament. The resultant total ACL force intersected the tibial plateau at the posterolateral aspect of the AM band's insertion at 30° of knee flexion, while at 90°, the force intersection moved posteriorly to the AM/PL border. This research provides new insight into the fundamental force relationships of the ACL and its bundles. In response to an anterior tibial shear force, the AM band of the ACL was the predominant load carrier at both 30° and 90° of knee flexion. However, contrary to carlier reports, the in situ force carried in the PL band increased as knee flexion increased. Further, the tibial intersection of the resultant ACL force moved laterally with knee flexion. These findings confirm the dynamic structure of the ACL that in itself has no isometricity and may also indicate that there is no ideal location in which to position a replacement graft. The use of this methodology with more physiologically unconstrained motion should lead to more definitive clinical conclusions.     

The effect of anterior cruciate ligament graft rotation on knee biomechanics

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects on knee biomechanics of rotating the distal end of the bone-patellar tendon graft 90° in anatomic single-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a porcine model.

Methods

Twenty (n = 20) porcine knees were evaluated using a robotic testing system. Two groups and three knee states were compared: (1) intact ACL, (2) deficient ACL and (3) anatomic SB ACL reconstruction with (a) non-rotated graft or (b) rotated graft (anatomic external fibre rotation). Anterior tibial translation (ATT), internal (IR) and external rotation (ER) and the in situ tissue force were measured under an 89-N anterior tibial (AT) load and 4-N m internal and external tibial torques.

Results

A significant difference from the intact ACL was found in ATT at 60° and 90° of knee flexion for rotated and non-rotated graft reconstructions (p < 0.05). There was a significant difference in the in situ force from the intact ACL with AT loading for rotated and non-rotated graft reconstructions at 60° and 90° of knee flexion (p < 0.05). Under IR loading, the in situ force was significantly different from the intact ACL at 30° and 60° of knee flexion for rotated and non-rotated graft reconstructions (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in ATT, IR, ER and the in situ force between rotated and non-rotated reconstructions.

Conclusion

Graft rotation can be used with anatomic SB ACL reconstruction and not have a deleterious effect on knee anterior and rotational biomechanics. This study has clinical relevance in regard to the use of graft rotation to better reproduce the native ACL fibre orientation in ACL reconstruction.

     

Coronal tibial anteromedial tunnel location has minimal effect on knee biomechanics

Purpose

Studies have found anatomic variation in the coronal position of the insertion site of anteromedial (AM) bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) on the tibia, which can lead to questions about tunnel placement during ACL reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to determine how mediolateral placement of the tibial AM graft tunnel in double-bundle ACL reconstructions affects knee biomechanics.

Methods

Two different types of double-bundle ACL reconstructions were performed. The AM tibial tunnel was placed at either the medial or lateral portion of tibial AM footprint. Nine cadaveric knees were tested with the robotic/universal force-moment sensor system with the use of (1) an 89.0-N anterior tibial load at full extension (FE), 30°, 60° and 90° of knee flexion and (2) a combined 7.0-Nm valgus torque and 5.0-Nm internal tibial rotation torque at FE, 15°, 30°and 45° of knee flexion.

Results

Both medial (2.6?±?1.2 mm) and lateral (1.6?±?0.9 mm) double-bundle reconstructions reduced the anterior tibial translation (ATT) to less than the intact value (3.9?±?0.7 mm) at FE. At all other flexion angles, there was no significant different in ATT between the intact knee and the reconstructions. At FE, the ATT for the medial AM reconstruction was different from that of the lateral AM construction and closer to the intact ACL value.

Conclusion

The coronal tibial placement of the AM tunnel had only a slight effect on knee biomechanics. In patients with differing AM bundle coronal positions, the AM tibial tunnel can be placed anatomically at the native insertion site.

     

Relative contribution of the ACL, MCL, and bony contact to the anterior stability of the knee

Ligaments and other soft tissues, as well as bony contact, all contribute to anterior stability of the knee joint. This study was designed to measure the in situ force in the medial collateral ligament (MCL), anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterolateral structures (PLS), and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in response to 110 N anterior tibial loading. The changes in knee kinematics associated with ACL deficiency and combined MCL+ACL deficiency were also evaluated. Utilizing a robotic/universal force-moment sensor system, ten human cadaveric knee joints were tested between 0° and 90° of knee flexion. This unique testing system is designed to determine the in situ forces in structures of interest without making mechanical contact with the tissue. More importantly, data for individual structures can be obtained from the same knee specimen since the robotic manipulator can reproduce the motion of the intact knee. The in situ forces in the ACL under anterior tibial loading to 110 N were highest at 15° flexion, 103 ± 14 N (mean ± SD), decreasing to 59.2 ± 30 N at 90° flexion. For the MCL, these forces were 8.0 ± 3.5 N and 38.1 ± 25 N, respectively. Forces due to bony contact were as high as 34.1 ± 23 N at 30° flexion, while those in the PLS were relatively small at all flexion angles. Combined MCL+ACL deficiency was found to significantly increase anterior tibial translation relative to the ACL-deficient knee only above 60° of knee flexion. These findings confirm the hypothesis that there is significant load sharing between various ligaments and bony contact during anterior tibial loading of the knee. For this reason, the MCL and osteochondral surfaces may also be at significant risk during ACL injury. Received: 29 December 1997 Accepted: 16 July 1998     

Analysis of the graft bending angle at the femoral tunnel aperture in anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of the transtibial and the far anteromedial portal technique

The aim of this study is to investigate and compare the three dimensional bending angle of the graft at the femoral tunnel aperture in the transtibial and the far anteromedial portal technique. Seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were used. Six degrees-of-freedom of knee kinematics and knee position data were measured using an electromagnetic device and the three dimensional bending angles of the each graft at the femoral tunnel aperture were calculated by computer simulation. Additionally, in order to assess the stress on the graft, the length change between the femoral and tibial attachment sites of the AM and PL bundle were calculated. The maximum length of each bundle was detected at full extension of the knee. The relative change of the length of the PL bundle in the range of 70°–0° of knee flexion was significantly larger than that of the AM bundle. (P < 0.05) Maximum graft bending angles in both techniques were obtained at full extension where the graft was fully stretched. The AM and PL graft bending angles in the transtibial technique were significantly larger than in the far anteromedial portal technique at low flexion angle (AM: 0°–10°, PL: 0°–50°) (P < 0.01). This suggests use of the far anteromedial portal technique might result in lower stress on the graft at the femoral tunnel aperture and therefore might reduce graft damage.     

Contribution of the meniscofemoral ligament as a restraint to the posterior tibial translation in a porcine knee

The meniscofemoral ligament (MFL) is a major structure in the posterior aspect of the porcine knee together with the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). While the porcine knee is a frequently used animal model for biomechanical evaluation of PCL reconstruction techniques, the contribution of the MFL to stability of the porcine knee is not well understood. The purpose of this study is (1) to evaluate the kinematics of the knee after sequential cutting of the PCL and MFL and (2) to determine the in situ forces of the PCL and MFL in response to a posterior tibial load of 89 N using the robotic/universal force-moment sensor system from 15° to 90° of knee flexion. Ten porcine knees were used in this study. The magnitude of posterior tibial translation under a posterior tibial load was significantly increased (P < 0.01) after sequential transection of the PCL and the MFL at each testing angle compared to the intact condition. The in situ force of the PCL was highest at 60° of flexion (82.3 ± 8.6 N) and lowest at 15° of flexion (45.1 ± 15.9 N). The in situ force of the MFL was highest at 15° of flexion (24.3 ± 6.5 N) and lowest at 90° of flexion (12.9 ± 10.5 N). The findings in this study revealed a biomechanical contribution of the MFL as the secondary restraint to the posterior tibial translation in conjunction with the PCL especially near full extension.     

Anatomic and non-anatomic anterior cruciate ligament posterolateral bundle augmentation affects graft function

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to compare knee laxity and graft function (tissue force) between anatomic and non-anatomic posterolateral (PL) bundle augmentation.

Methods

Twelve (n = 12) fresh-frozen mature, unpaired porcine knees were tested using a robotic testing system. Four knee states were compared: (a) intact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), (b) deficient PL and intermediate bundles, (c) anatomic PL augmentation, and (d) non-anatomic PL augmentation. Anterior tibial translation (ATT), internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER), and the in situ tissue force were measured under an 89.0-N anterior tibial load and 4.0-N m internal and external tibial torques.

Results

Both anatomic and non-anatomic PL augmentation restored the ER, IR, and ATT of the intact knee at all knee flexion angles (n.s.). Both anatomic and non-anatomic PL augmentation restored the in situ tissue force of the ACL during ER and IR loading and ATT loading at all knee flexion angles except at 60° of knee flexion, where the non-anatomic PL augmentation did not restore the in situ tissue force of the ACL during external rotation loading and the anatomic PL augmentation did not restore the in situ tissue force of the ACL during IR loading. Furthermore, there were no differences in ATT, IR, ER, and in situ tissue force under anterior tibial loading, IR and ER loading between the two reconstruction groups.

Conclusion

There were no significant differences between anatomic and non-anatomic PL augmentation using the porcine knee model.

     

Anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle ACL reconstruction: a comparative biomechanical study in rabbits

Thirty New Zealand white rabbits underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in their right knees; 15 animals underwent a double-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction using the medial third of the patellar tendon and the semitendinosus tendon. Additionally, 15 animals underwent ACL reconstruction, using a single-bundle semitendinosus tendon autograft. The knees of both groups were evaluated with a device similar to the KT1000 arthrometer onto which a dial indicator was attached (Mitutoyo dial indicator 2050) in 30° and 90° of flexion, preoperatively, after ACL resection and 3 months postoperatively. Statistical analysis of the results revealed that for 90° of knee flexion, the mean estimated anterior shift for the double-bundle technique was 1.92 mm lesser than that of the single-bundle technique (P = 0.006). For 30° of knee flexion, the mean anterior shift was again lesser than that of the single-bundle technique by 0.66 mm, but this difference was not statistically significant. The described double-bundle ACL reconstruction technique resulted in a more stable knee as far as the anterior tibial shift was concerned as compared to a single-bundle ACL reconstruction. This animal model may be potentially useful in the future for the study of other parameters influencing the outcome of the double-bundle ACL reconstruction.     

Comparative risk of common peroneal nerve injury in far anteromedial portal drilling and transtibial drilling in anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk of common peroneal nerve injury in FM drilling as compared to transtibial drilling in anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Methods

Ten cadaveric knees without ligament injury or significant arthritis were used for this study. Knees were secured at 90° and 120° of flexion. In transtibial drilling groups, a guide pin was drilled through either the anteromedial bundle (AMB) or posterolateral bundle (PLB) tibial insertion site to either the AMB or PLB femoral insertion site (tibial insertion site–femoral insertion site: AM–AM, PL–PL, PL-AM and AM–PL). In FM drilling groups (FM-AM and FM-PL),the pin was drilled at the AMB or PLB femoral insertion site through the FM. We measured the shortest distance between the point at which the pin ran through the lateral cortex of the femur and the ipsilateral common peroneal nerve at a knee flexion of 90° and 120°.

Results

At a knee flexion of 90°, the shortest mean distance to the common peroneal nerve was 15.3?mm in the FM-PL group, 13.4?mm in the FM-AM group, 27.9?mm in the PL–PL group, 30.8?mm in the AM–AM group, 37.8?mm in the PL–AM group and 29.5?mm in the AM–PL group. At a knee of flexion 120°, the mean distance was 17.3?mm in the FM-PL group, 18.1?mm in the FM-AM group, 32.2?mm in the PL–PL group, 36.6?mm in the AM–AM group, 38.0?mm in the PL–AM group and 35.2?mm in the AM–PL group. Significant differences were observed between 90° and 120° of knee flexion in the FM-AM, PL–PL, AM–AM and AM–PL groups (P?<?0.05).Significant differences were observed at flex 90° between the FM-AM group and AM–AM group, and between the FM-AM group and PL–AM group. Significant differences were observed at flex 120° between the FM-AM group and AM–AM group, between the FM-AM group and PL–AM group and between the FM-PL group and AM–PL group.

Conclusion

The distance to the peroneal nerve in FM drilling was significantly longer at 120° than at 90° of knee flexion. Therefore, the risk of peroneal injury using FM drilling should decrease at a higher angle of knee flexion.     

Does a lateral plasty control coupled translation during antero-posterior stress in single-bundle ACL reconstruction? An in vivo study

The objective of this study was to quantify, in vivo, the reduction of knee laxity obtained by an extra-articular procedure, added to hamstring single-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in controlling coupled tibial translation during the Lachman and drawer tests. Twenty-eight patients were evaluated with a computer-assisted kinematic evaluation protocol; patients with associated ligament tears or meniscal damages were not included in the study. All patients underwent an hamstring ACL with an additional extra-articular procedure. During the intervention, tibia was tracked during the Lachman and drawer tests with ACL-deficient knee, after SB fixation and after extra-articular plasty fixation, performed with the remnant part of the hamstring tendons, from end of lateral condyle to Gerdy’s tubercle. Statistical analysis was performed to see whether there was a difference in knee laxity after the tests in the three steps. At 30°, the SB graft reduces AP translation of about 5 mm (P < 0.05) while the extra-articular procedure controls lateral tibial compartment, reducing translation by 1.6 mm (P < 0.05). At 90° the SB graft reduces AP translation more in the lateral compartment (P < 0.05), while the extra-articular procedure contributes in controlling tibial translation reducing laxity by 1 mm (P < 0.05) in both compartments. Result shows that, in vivo, the addition of an extra-articular procedure to single-bundle ACL reconstruction may be effective in controlling coupled tibial translation during the Lachman test and reduces AP laxity at 90° of flexion.     

In vivo laxity of stable versus anterior cruciate liagment-injured knees using a navigation system: a comparative study

We compared antero-posterior translation and internal–external rotation of the tibia in stable knees without anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury with those of ACL injured knees using a navigation system and suggest an objective data. Forty-four patients treated for a meniscal tear without ACL injury were allocated to stable group, and 41 patients were allocated to ACL injury group. Antero-posterior displacement and rotation of knees were measured in 0, 30, 60 and 90 degrees of flexion using navigation. Mean anterior displacements were 3.6 ± 2.0, 6.7 ± 2.7, 6.0 ± 2.4 and 4.7 ± 1.8 mm at 0, 30, 60 and 90 degrees of flexion, respectively, in stable group, and 6.8 ± 3.6, 14.7 ± 3.5, 11.9 ± 4.6 and 8.5 ± 4.0 mm in ACL injury group. Mean total rotation values were 18.8 ± 4.5°, 31.4 ± 4.2°, 30.1 ± 5.1° and 29.2 ± 5.9° in stable group and 22.7 ± 6.9°, 37.6 ± 5.8°, 34.0 ± 9.4° and 31.8 ± 8.8° in ACL injury group. Quantitative values of antero-posterior translations and rotations of stable and ACL injured knees were obtained using a navigation system. The laxity data may be useful to establish the diagnosis of an ACL injury and evaluation of post-operative results.     

Knee flexor strength after ACL reconstruction: comparison between hamstring autograft, tibialis anterior allograft, and non-injured controls

Hamstring muscle group dysfunction following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL) using a semitendinosus–gracilis autograft is a growing concern. This study compared the mean peak isometric knee flexor torque of the following three groups: subjects 2 years following ACL reconstruction using semitendinosus–gracilis autografts (Group 1), subjects 2 years following ACL reconstruction using tibialis anterior allografts (Group 2), and a non-injured, activity-level-matched control group (Group 3). We hypothesized that Group 1 would have greater mean involved lower extremity peak isometric knee flexor torque deficits than the other groups. Handheld dynamometry with subjects in prone and the test knee at 90° flexion was used to determine bilateral peak isometric knee flexor torque. Group 1 (86.4 ± 11) and Group 2 (80.5 ± 13) had similar 2000 IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Form scores (P = NS). Group 1 had a mean involved lower extremity peak isometric knee flexor torque deficit of −17.0 ± 14 Nm. Group 2 had a mean involved lower extremity peak isometric knee flexor torque deficit of −0.8 ± 9 Nm. Group 3 (control) had a mean left and right lower extremity peak isometric knee flexor torque difference of −0.7 ± 14 Nm. Group 1 had decreased involved lower extremity peak isometric knee flexor torque compared to Groups 2 and 3 (two-way ANOVA; group × side interaction P < 0.05, Tukey HSD = 0.008). Long-term knee flexor strength deficits exist following hamstring autograft use for ACL reconstruction that does not occur when a tibialis anterior allograft is used. Early identification of impaired knee flexor strength among this group and modified rehabilitation may reduce these deficits. Adding quantitative biomechanical testing of sprinting and sudden directional change movements to the standard physical therapy evaluation will better elucidate the clinical and functional significance of the observed knee flexor strength impairments and aid in determining sport specific activity training readiness.     

The functions of the fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament in anterior drawer,rotational laxity and the pivot shift

This paper reviews the functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), which has a parallel array of collagen fascicles that have usually been divided into two ‘fibre bundles’: anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL), according to their tibial attachment sites. The PL bundle has shorter fibres, and so it is subjected to greater tensile strains than the AM bundle when the whole ACL is stretched; its oblique orientation in the coronal plane imbues it with greater ability to resist tibial rotation than the more vertical AM fibre bundle. Most studies have found that the AM bundle is close to isometric when the knee flexes, while the PL bundle slackens approximately 6 mm. There is little evidence of significant fibre bundle elongation in response to tibial rotation. Selective bundle cutting studies have been performed, allowing both the bundle tensions and their contributions to resisting tibial anterior translation and tibial rotation to be calculated. These show that the function of the PL bundle was dominant near knee extension in some studies, particularly when resisting anterior drawer and that its contribution reduced rapidly with knee flexion through 30 degrees. There has been little study of the contributions of the fibre bundles in control of tibial internal–external rotation or the pivot shift: one study found that the AM bundle had larger tensions than the PL bundle during a simulated pivot shift, but another study found that cutting the PL bundle allowed a larger increase in coupled tibial anterior translation than cutting the AM bundle. It was concluded that the AM bundle is most important for resisting tibial anterior drawer—the primary function of the ACL—while the PL bundle is tight near knee extension, when it has a role in control of tibial rotational laxity. There is a clear need for further study of dynamic knee instability, to gain better understanding of how best to reconstruct the ACL and associated tissues.