The 'ABC for life' programme - teaching basic life support in schools

BACKGROUND: Less than 1% of the general public know how to assess or manage someone who has collapsed. It has been estimated that if 15-20% of the population were capable of performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), mortality of out of hospital cardiac arrest could be decreased significantly. Training basic life support (BLS) skills to school children would be the most cost effective way of achieving this goal and ensuring that a large proportion of the population acquire basic life saving skills. AIMS: To assess retention of knowledge of basic life support 6 months after a single course of instruction in cardiopulmonary resuscitation designed specifically for school children. SETTING: School pupils in a rural location in one region of the United Kingdom. METHODS: A course of instruction in cardiopulmonary resuscitation - the 'ABC for life' programme - specifically designed to teach 10-12-year-old school children basic life support skills. The training session was given to school pupils in a rural location in Northern Ireland. A 22 point questionnaire was used to assess acquisition and retention of basic life support knowledge. RESULTS: Children instructed in cardiopulmonary resuscitation showed a highly significant increase in level of knowledge following the training session. While their level of knowledge decreased over a period of 6 months it remained significantly higher than that of a comparable group of children who had never been trained. CONCLUSION: A training programme designed and taught as part of the school curriculum would have a significant impact on public health.     

Comparison of chest compression only and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Singapore

OBJECTIVE: Chest compression only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CC-CPR) without ventilation has been proposed as an alternative to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for bystanders. However, there has been controversy regarding the relative effectiveness of both of these techniques. We aim to compare the outcomes of cardiac arrest patients in the cardiac arrest and resuscitation epidemiology study who either received CC-CPR, standard CPR or no bystander CPR. METHODS: This prospective cohort study involved all out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients attended to by emergency medical service (EMS) providers in a large urban centre. The data analyses were conducted secondarily on these collected data. The technique of bystander CPR was reported by paramedics who arrived at the scene. RESULTS: From 1 October 2001 to 14 October 2004, 2428 patients were enrolled into the study. Of these, 255 were EMS-witnessed arrests and were excluded. 1695 cases did not receive any bystander CPR, 287 had standard CPR and 154 CC-CPR. Patient characteristics were similar in both the standard and CC-CPR groups except for a higher incidence of residential arrests and previous heart disease sufferers in the CC-CPR group. Patients who received standard CPR (odds ratio (OR) 5.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1-14.0) or CC-CPR (OR 5.0, 95% CI 1.5-16.4) were more likely to survive to discharge than those who had no bystander CPR. There was no significant difference in survival to discharge between those who received CC-CPR and standard CPR (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.3-3.1). CONCLUSION: We found that patients were more likely to survive with any form of bystander CPR than without. This emphasises the importance of chest compressions for OHCA patients, whether with or without ventilation.     

Retention of CPR skills learned in a traditional AHA Heartsaver course versus 30-min video self-training: a controlled randomized study

BACKGROUND: Bystander CPR improves outcomes after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The length of current 4-h classes in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a barrier to more widespread dissemination of CPR training and older adults in particular are underrepresented in traditional classes. Training with a brief video self-instruction (VSI) program has shown that this type of training can produce short-term skill performance at least as good as that seen with traditional American Heart Association (AHA) Heartsaver training, although it is unclear whether there is comparable skill retention. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred and eight-five adults between the ages of 40 and 70 who had no CPR training within the past 5 years were assigned at random to a no-training control group, Heartsaver (HS) training, or one of three versions of brief VSI (i.e., self-trained-ST subjects). Post-training performance of CPR skills was assessed in a scenario format by human examiners and by sensored manikin at Time 1 (immediately post-training) and again at Time 2 (2 months post-training). Performance by controls was assessed only once. Significant (P<.001) decline was observed in the three measures recorded by examiners; assess responsiveness (from 72% to 60% for HS subjects and from 90% to 77% for ST subjects), call 911 (from 82% to 74% for HS subjects and from 71% to 53% for ST subjects), and overall performance (from 42% to 30% for HS subjects and from 60% to 44% for ST subjects). Significant (P<.001) decline was observed in two of three skills measured by a sensored manikin: ventilation volume (from 40% to 36% for HS subjects and from 61% to 41% for ST subjects, with a significant [P=.028] interaction) and correct hand placement (from 68% to 59% for HS subjects and from 80% to 64% for ST subjects). Heartsaver and self-trained subjects generally showed similar rates of decline. At Time 2, examiners rated trained subjects better than untrained controls in all skills except calling 911, where self-trained subjects did not differ from controls; manikin data revealed that trained subjects' performance was better than that of controls for ventilation volume, but had declined to the level of controls for both hand placement and compression depth. CONCLUSIONS: Adults between 40 and 70 years of age who participated in a CPR VSI program experienced performance decline in their CPR skills after a post-training interval of 2 months. However, this decline was no greater than that seen in subjects who took Heartsaver training. The VSI program produced retention performance at least as good as that seen with traditional training. Additional effort is needed to improve both initial performance and retention of CPR skills. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: Retention of CPR skills was compared 2 months post-training for adults between 40 and 70 years old who had taken either a traditional Heartsaver CPR course or a 22-min video self-directed training course. Although performance declines occurred in the 2-month interval, self-trained subjects generally demonstrated CPR skill retention equivalent to that of Heartsaver-trained subjects, although for both groups skill decline on some measures reached the level of untrained controls.     

Prospective, randomized trial of the effectiveness and retention of 30-min layperson training for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillators: The American Airlines Study

OBJECTIVE: A head-to-head trial was conducted to compare laypersons' long-term retention of life-saving psychomotor and cognitive skills learned in the traditional multi-hour training format for basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator use to those learned in an abbreviated (30 min) course. METHODS: Laypersons were randomized to either: (1) the traditional multi-hour Heartsaver-Automated External Defibrillator (Heartsaver-AED) group; or (2) the 30-min course group (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, choking, and automated external defibrillator use). Immediately after training, and at 6 months, participants were provided identical individual testing scenarios. In addition to audio-video recordings, computerized recordings of compression rate/depth, ventilation rates, and related pauses were obtained and subsequently rated by blinded reviewers. RESULTS: Performance following 30-min training was either equivalent or superior (p<0.007) to the multi-hour Heartsaver-Automated External Defibrillator training in all measurements, both immediately and 6 months after training. Although retention of certain skills deteriorated over the 6 months among a significant number of participants from both groups, 84% of the 30-min training group still was judged, overall, to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation adequately. Moreover, 93% still were performing chest compressions adequately and 93% continued to apply the automated external defibrillator and deliver shocks correctly. CONCLUSIONS: Using innovative learning techniques, 30-min cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator training is as effective as traditional multi-hour courses, even after 6 months. Thirty-minute courses should decrease labor intensity, demands on resources, and time commitments for cardiopulmonary resuscitation courses, thus facilitating more widespread and frequent retraining.     

How Well are Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Automated External Defibrillator Skills Retained over Time? Results from the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial

Background: The current standard for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) retraining for laypersons is a four‐hour course every two years. Others have documented substantial skill deterioration during this time period. Objectives: To evaluate 1) the retention of core CPR and AED skills among volunteer laypersons and 2) the time required to retrain laypersons to proficiency as a function of time since initial training. Methods: This was an observational follow‐up study evaluating CPR and AED skill retention and testing/retraining time up through 17 months after initial training. The study took place at 1,260 facilities recruited by 24 North American clinical research centers, and included 6,182 volunteer laypersons participating in the Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial. Training to proficiency in either CPR only (N= 2,426) or CPR+AED (N= 3,756) was followed by testing/retraining provided three to 17 months later. Retraining was done in brief, one‐on‐one, individualized, interactive sessions. The outcome studied was instructors' global assessments of performance of CPR and AED skill adequacy, i.e., whether CPR actions would likely result in perfusion (yes/no) and whether AED actions would result in a shock through the heart (yes/no). Results: For global CPR performance, 79%, 73%, and 71% of volunteers tested for the first time since initial training three to five, six to 11, and 12 to 17 months after initial training, respectively, were judged by their instructors as having adequate performance (p < 0.001, chi‐square for linear trend). For global AED performance, 91%, 86%, and 84% of volunteers, respectively, were judged as having adequate performance (p < 0.001). The mean (± standard deviation) times required to test and retrain volunteers to proficiency were 5.7 (± 4.0) minutes for CPR skills and 7.7 (± 4.6) minutes for CPR+AED skills. Conclusions: Among PAD Trial volunteer laypersons participating in a simulated resuscitation, the proportions of volunteers judged by instructors to have adequate CPR and AED skills demonstrated small declines associated with longer intervals between initial training and subsequent testing. However, based on instructors' judgment, large majorities of volunteers still retained both CPR and AED core skills through 17 months after initial training. Furthermore, individual testing and retraining for CPR and AED skills were usually accomplished in less than 10 minutes per volunteer. Additional research is essential to identify training and evaluation techniques that predict adequate CPR and AED skill performance of laypersons when applied to an actual cardiac arrest.     

The effect of time on CPR and automated external defibrillator skills in the Public Access Defibrillation Trial

BACKGROUND: The time to skill deterioration between primary training/retraining and further retraining in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillation (AED) for lay-persons is unclear. The Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) trial was a multi-center randomized controlled trial evaluating survival after CPR-only versus CPR+AED delivered by onsite non-medical volunteer responders in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. AIMS: This sub-study evaluated the relationship of time between primary training/retraining and further retraining on volunteer performance during pretest AED and CPR skill evaluation. METHODS: Volunteers at 1260 facilities in 24 North American regions underwent training/retraining according to facility randomization, which included an initial session and a refresher session at approximately 6 months. Before the next retraining, a CPR and AED skill test was completed for 2729 volunteers. Primary outcome for the study was assessment of global competence of CPR or AED performance (adequate versus not adequate) using chi(2)-test for trends by time interval (3, 6, 9, and 12 months). Confirmatory (GEE) logistic regression analysis, adjusted for site and potential confounders was done. RESULTS: The proportion of volunteers judged to be competent did not diminish by interval (3, 6, 9, and 12 months) for either CPR or AED skills. After adjusting for site and potential confounders, longer intervals to further retraining was associated with a slightly lower likelihood of performing adequate CPR but not with AED scores. CONCLUSIONS: After primary training/retraining, the CPR skills of targeted lay responders deteriorate nominally but 80% remain competent up to 1 year. AED skills do not deteriorate significantly and 90% of volunteers remain competent up to 1 year.     

Doctor-based basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation course: an alternative to the conventional approach

United Christian Hospital initiated a doctor-based cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) Program. It is a two-hour, focused, adult CPR course, suitable for adults of different age groups and of different educational levels. The course was rated highly by the participants. Most trainees acquired CPR knowledge and skills, and had confidence to perform CPR. This type of training could improve the rate of bystander CPR for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in this region. Avoiding the complexity and pass-fail psychology that is used in the traditional CPR training curriculum, it can be an alternative to the traditional four-hour instructor-based Basic Life Support (BLS) course.     

Impact of cardiopulmonary resuscitation training on resuscitation.

Restoration of adequate spontaneous circulation after "arrest" and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) of 546 patients before and 460 patients after initiation of a CPR training course in a 500-bed city hospital is reported. Between January 1972 and June 1976, adequate circulation after CPR was present in 38.6% of patients before and 50.4% after training ICU nurses and house physicians in modern resuscitation techniques. Factors crucial to resumption of adequate circulation are: (1) CPR training of all hospital personnel so that effective CPR can be started immediately after recognition of an arrest situation, (2) production of a palpable pulse with closed chest cardiac massage, and (3) prompt effective therapy so that the time interval between arrest and resumption of adequate spontaneous circulation is short.     

Retention of infant CPR instruction by parents

Twenty-one families of high-risk infants were followed at home after receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) instruction prior to hospital discharge. Parents retained large amounts of theoretical knowledge about CPR up to 2 months following instruction. Skills were less well retained, but retention was better than reported for other lay groups.     

Training rates and willingness to perform CPR in King County, Washington: a community survey

Background

It has been hypothesized that high rates of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training in a community will lead to improved survival for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, factors to consider when designing a far-reaching community CPR training program are not well defined. We explored factors associated with receiving CPR training in the survey community and characteristics contributing to willingness to perform CPR in an emergency.

Methods

A telephone survey was administered to 1001 randomly selected residents in September 2008 assessing CPR training history, demographics, and willingness to perform CPR. Characteristics of survey respondents were compared to examine factors that may be associated with reports of being trained compared to reports of never being trained. A stratified analysis compared characteristics of respondents who reported a high level of willingness to perform CPR in those trained compared to those never trained.

Results

The survey response rate was 39%. Seventy-nine percent of survey respondents reported ever attending a CPR training class. A majority of people (53%) attended their most recent class more than five years ago. People who had never been trained in CPR were older, were more likely to be men and were less likely to have at least a 2-year college degree than those who had ever been trained. Among those who had been trained, younger age, male gender, time of last training and number of times trained were all significantly associated with willingness to perform CPR and none of these factors were associated with willingness in those who had not been trained.

Conclusions

Retraining rates, methods for reaching underserved populations and measures that will improve the likelihood that bystanders will perform CPR in an emergency should be considered when designing a community CPR education program.     

Retention, retention, retention: targeting the young in CPR skills training!

The usefulness of basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training in school systems has been questioned, considering that young students may not have the physical or cognitive skills required to perform complex tasks correctly. In the study conducted by Fleishhackl and coworkers, students as young as 9 years were able to successfully and effectively learn basic CPR skills, including automated external defibrillator deployment, correct recovery position, and emergency calling. As in adults, physical strength may limit the depth of chest compressions and ventilation volumes given by younger individuals with low body mass index; however, skill retention is good. Training all persons across an entire community in CPR may have a logarithmic improvement in survival rates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest because bystanders, usually family members, are more likely to know CPR and can perform it immediately, when it is physiologically most effective. Training captured audiences of trainees, such as the entire work-force of the community or the local school system, are excellent mechanisms to help achieve that goal. In addition to better retention with new half hour training kits, a multiplier effect can be achieved through school children. In addition, early training not only sets the stage for subsequent training and better retention, but it also reinforces the concept of a social obligation to help others.     

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: how far have we come?

In the 43 years since it was first described, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has grown from an obscure medical theory to a basic first aid skill taught to adults and is now the near-universal technique used in CPR instruction. This article provides insight into the history of CPR. We explore the phenomenon of sudden cardiac arrest, the historical roots of CPR, current practice data and recommendations, and the society's role in the development of this life-saving technique. We conclude with a review of CPR's economic impact on the healthcare system and the ethical and policy issues surrounding CPR.     

A rationale for staged teaching of basic life support

Basic life support is a crucial part of the Chain of Survival. Unfortunately, however the skill is complex and cannot readily be acquired--let alone retained--in the course of a single training session. Although the problem has long been recognised, no new strategies have been widely implemented to counter the problem. We believe that staged teaching of CPR might provide a solution, and we have devised a program to test this new method. It involves three stages of instruction that we have called bronze, silver, and gold standards. The bronze standard involves opening the airway and providing chest compression without active ventilation: this alone may widen the window of opportunity for successful defibrillation in adult victims in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Ventilation is introduced at silver stage using a ratio of 50:5, with emphasis on its value in the resuscitation of children being used as motivation to bring people back for a second period of instruction. The gold stage teaches conventional CPR. A pilot study has been encouraging and a randomized trial on skill acquisition and skill retention is planned.     

Effectiveness of mouth-to-mouth ventilation after video self-instruction training in laypersons

Background

Mouth-to-mouth ventilation is a skill taught in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training for laypersons. However, its effectiveness is questioned. Our aim was to determine the effectiveness of mouth-to-mouth ventilation training using a self-instruction CPR training video for laypersons.

Methods

Video-self-instruction CPR training was conducted with CPR Anytime (American Heart Association [AHA] & Laerdal Corporation) for laypersons who had not received CPR training during the recent 5 years. Immediately before, immediately after, and 8 weeks after the CPR training, an AHA basic life support instructor carried out a skill performance test using a standardized checklist. Also, 8 weeks after the training, a skill test concerning chest compression and mouth-to-mouth ventilation was conducted using a trained reporter.

Results

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation training of 84 laypersons was conducted. The mean performance score (from 0 to 2) for mouth-to-mouth ventilation was 0.24 right before the training, 1.58 right after the training, and 0.95 eight weeks after the training. The mean performance scores for chest compression were 0.13, 1.79, and 1.40, right before, right after, and 8 weeks after the CPR training, respectively. The rates of successful mouth-to-mouth ventilation and compression were 11.9%, and 39.1%, respectively.

Conclusions

The effectiveness and short-term retention rate of mouth-to-mouth ventilation after video self-instruction CPR training in laypersons was significantly lower than for chest compressions.     

预备役官兵心肺复苏认知调查及培训效果

目的：了解预备役官兵对徒手心肺复苏术（ CPR）知识和技能的掌握情况,并分析CPR知识培训后的效果。方法采用自行设计的问卷调查表对150名预备役官兵在培训前、后CPR知识及技能掌握情况进行调查。结果本次调查发放问卷150份,4份填写不完整,回收有效问卷146份,有效回收率97．3％。培训前25．3％预备役官兵对CPR知识缺乏,45．2％获得CPR知识的途径主要来源于电视、报刊;8．9％从专业书籍中获取;20．5％听他人说。17．1％会正确CPR操作。培训后100％官兵掌握了判断意识丧失和心跳停止的方法;98．6％会判断呼吸停止;94．5％掌握了呼吸心跳停止处理措施;73.3％掌握了心肺复苏的基本步骤;72．6％会实施人工呼吸;87．7％能准确按压心脏的部位;87．7％掌握胸外心脏按压的胸骨下限的深度。146名预备役官兵CPR知识培训后各项知识知晓率均高于培训前,差异均有统计学意义（P＜0．05）。结论通过培训,预备役官兵CPR认知和技能得以提升,提高了特殊群体对CPR知识和技能掌握的程度,以期保证“第一时间”施救的成功率。     

对社区居民心肺复苏培训的效果评价

目的 探讨对社区居民进行心肺复苏知识和技能培训的效果.方法 采用理论加模型相结合的方法 对60名社区居民进行心肺复苏理论知识和技能的培训,利用改良版生命ABC问卷对培训前后60名社区居民的心肺复苏知识掌握情况的效果进行评价.结果 培训前社区居民普遍缺乏心肺复苏知识和技能,通过培训后,除4个条目外,其他条目的 掌握情况较培训前比较均有显著提高.结论 社区居民普遍缺乏心肺复苏知识,通过对其培训能有效地提高社区居民心肺复苏知识.     

How bystanders perceive their cardiopulmonary resuscitation intervention; a qualitative study

The importance of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) prior to arrival of the emergency medical service is well documented. In Sweden, CPR is initiated prior to emergency medical services (EMS) arrival in about 30% of cardiac arrests out-of-hospital, a figure which should be improved urgently. To do so, it is of interest to know more about the bystanders' perceptions of their intervention. A qualitative method inspired by the phenomenographic approach was applied to 19 bystanders who had performed CPR. In the analysis, five main categories and 14 subcategories emerged. The main categories were: to have a sense of humanity, to have competence, to feel an obligation, to have courage and to feel exposed. Interviews described how humanity and concern for another human being were the foundation of their intervention. CPR training offers the possibility to give appropriate help in this emergency. If the aim of CPR training was extended beyond teaching the skill of CPR to include preparation of the rescuer for the intervention and his/her reactions, this might increase the number of people able to take action in the cardiac arrest situation.     

Trials of teaching methods in basic life support (3): comparison of simulated CPR performance after first training and at 6 months,with a note on the value of re-training

A randomised controlled trial comparing staged teaching of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with conventional training provided the additional opportunity to investigate skill acquisition and retention in those attending conventional CPR classes. All subjects were tested immediately after their first instruction period and again at 6-9 months at an unheralded home visit. We were able to assess how far performance was related to poor acquisition of skills and how far it was related to skill decay. Out of 262 subjects who were randomised to receive conventional CPR instruction, 166 were available for home testing at 6-9 months. An invitation to attend for re-training had been accepted by 39 of them. The remaining 127 who attended only a single class comprise the principal study group, with additional comparative observations on the smaller re-trained cohort. Important failings were observed in the acquisition of skills in all modalities tested after the initial instruction. These were particularly marked in skills related to ventilation. Immediately after a class, 68% of trainees performed an effective check of breathing, but only 33% opened the airway as taught and no more than 18% provided an ideal ventilation volume. The technique of chest compression was also less than ideal. Although 80% of subjects placed their hands in an acceptable position, compression to an adequate depth and an adequate rate of compression were achieved by 54 and 63%, respectively. Seventy-eight percent demonstrated a careful approach, and 46% remembered to call for help. A carotid pulse check was simulated by 61% of trainees. When tested 6-9 months later, skill deterioration from this baseline was observed in all modalities tested except for the ventilation volume. The skill decay was significant (P<0.05) for the careful approach, performing an effective breathing check, the carotid pulse check, placing the hands in an acceptable position for chest compression, and compressing at an optimal rate. The minority who attended for re-training showed a trend to protection against skill decay for seven of the ten variables, compared with those who had attended only one training session. This improvement was significant for only two of them, but all were relatively small with limited practical value. Many who attend conventional CPR classes fail to acquire the necessary skills, and the skills that are acquired decline appreciably over the subsequent 6-9 months. The value of conventional re-training was modest in this study of community volunteers.     

A decade of in-hospital resuscitation: Outcomes and prediction of survival?

OBJECTIVE: To provide survival rates and associated factors from a 10-year study of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). DESIGN: Longitudinal prospective case register study of all adult in-hospital CPR attempts conducted from April 1993 to March 2003. SETTING: 1200-bed general hospital in Plymouth (UK). PATIENTS: 2121 adult in-hospital CPR attempts in Derriford Hospital, Plymouth during the period April 1993-March 2003. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Immediate, 24 h, hospital discharge and 12 month survival rates. RESULTS: Following CPR the immediate survival rate (95% confidence interval (C.I.)) was 38.6% (36.5, 40.7), then 24.7% (22.8, 26.6) at 24 h, 15.9% (14.4, 17.6) at discharge and 11.3% (10.0, 12.7) at 12 months. The primary arrhythmia, age, duration of arrest and time of arrest were strongly related to survival at 24 h and discharge. There were very low survival rates for pulse-less electrical activity (PEA) and asystole compared to VT/VF arrests; survival rates were highest for those less than 60 years and decreased with increasing age. The longer the resuscitation the less the survival, and those who arrested at night were less likely to survive. The primary arrest, respiratory or cardiac, was also independently associated with survival at 24 h but not with hospital discharge. Sex and the commencement of basic life support (BLS) within 3 min was not an independent predictor of survival. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study show resuscitation survival rates from a 10-year study and indicate some of the key predictors of survival.     

Comparison of three instructional methods for teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation and use of an automatic external defibrillator to high school students

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate new instructional methods for teaching high school students cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) knowledge, actions and skills. METHODS: We conducted a cluster-controlled trial of 3 instructional interventions among Seattle area high school students, with random allocation based on classrooms, during 2003-04. We examined two new instructional methods: interactive-computer training and interactive-computer training plus instructor-led (hands-on) practice, and compared them with traditional classroom instruction that included video, teacher demonstration and instructor-led (hands-on) practice, and with a control group. We assessed CPR and AED knowledge, performance of key AED and CPR actions, and essential CPR ventilation and compressions skills 2 days and 2 months after training. All outcomes were transformed to a scale of 0-100%. RESULTS: For all outcome measures mean scores were higher in the instructional groups than in the control group. Two days after training all instructional groups had mean CPR and AED knowledge scores above 75%, with use of the computer program scores were above 80%. Mean scores for key AED actions were above 80% for all groups with training, with hands-on practice enhancing students' positive outcomes for AED pad placement. Students who received hands-on practice more successfully performed CPR actions than those in the computer program only group. In the 2 hands-on practice groups the scores for 3 of the outcomes ranged from 57 to 74%; they were 32 to 54% in the computer only group. For the outcome of continuing CPR until the AED was available scores were high, 89 to 100% in all 3 training groups. Mean CPR skill scores were low in all groups. The highest mean score for successful ventilations was 15% and for compressions, 29%. The pattern of results was similar after 2 months. CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence that interactive computer based self instruction alone was sufficient to teach CPR and AED knowledge and AED actions to high school students. All forms of instruction were highly effective in teaching AED use. In contrast to AED skills, CPR remains a set of difficult psychomotor skills that is challenging to teach to high school students as well as other members of the lay public.