Non-heart-beating donor, 10-year experience in a Belgian transplant center

All over the world, transplant teams are looking for ways to increase and improve the donor pool. Non-heart-beating donation may increase the number of donors, even if some technical, logistical, and emotional problems are still encountered. The results obtained by our team should stimulate other centers to implement this kind of donation in their hospitals. Herein we have described our experience with non-heart-beating donation.     

Lebendspende-Nierentransplantation

Due to the existing organ shortage the option of a kidney transplantation (KTx) in patients with end-stage renal disease is not always possible despite the offer of this therapy. So far the required number of KTx could not be adequately achieved by organ donations from deceased persons. To solve this problem living donation KTx programs have already become established in many transplantation centers. In published reports it has been shown that with the living donation program better results could be achieved in terms of graft function and patient survival compared to cadaver donation KTx. Therefore, living donation KTx allows an optimal alternative to expand the organ pool. The aim of our study is to present the long-term results of our living donation KTx program regarding graft function and patient survival. Finally, the risks of living donation KTx will be discussed based on the reported experiences of other centers.     

Increasing organ recovery from level I trauma centers: the in-house coordinator intervention

PURPOSE: Daily presence of organ procurement organization staff in level I trauma centers combined with early family contact and interaction can increase donation rates. METHODS: A successful in-house coordinator program already in place at 2 level I trauma centers in Houston was replicated in 6 other level I trauma centers in New York City, Los Angeles, and Seattle. Organ procurement organization staff were placed inside the 8 trauma centers to provide early family support in potential donor situations and day-to-day donation system management. Comparison data were obtained on 83 level I trauma centers nationally. Data from 1999 to 2000 were compared with data from 2001 to 2002. RESULTS: Despite demographic differences, the 8 centers with in-house coordinators had higher consent rates (60% vs 53%) and conversion rates (55% vs 45%) than centers without them. Conversion of potential to actual donors was 22% higher in centers with in-house coordinators than in centers without them. Donation rates were affected by donor age, ethnicity, previous family discussion of donation, the family's initial reaction to the request (favorable, unfavorable, undecided), amount of time family spent with the in-house coordinator, presence of the in-house coordinator during explanation of brain death, whether the request was made at the same time as the brain-death explanation, and, in cases where donation was mentioned to the family before the formal request, who first mentioned donation to the family. CONCLUSIONS: In-house coordinators improve the donation process by interacting with families and staff earlier and more often during potential organ donations and improving donation systems through closer relationships with hospital staff.     

Transplant coordination activities in the Başkent University Hospital Network

Our transplantation center adopted a new model of operation, with 3 affiliated centers of the Ba?kent University. The aim of this system is to standardize procedures related to organ procurement and transplantation, to increase organ donation, and to improve the quality of services. The transplant team is composed of a transplant coordinator, and transplant clinicians and surgeons. The transplant coordinator works independently, and promotes organ donation and procurement, organizes interviews with donor families, and is in contact with national and international organ-sharing organizations. The organs and tissues are transplanted in the Ankara hospital of the network if the cadaver organ source is one of the Ba?kent University hospitals. If no appropriate recipient is available, the organs and tissues are offered to the National Coordination Center for other transplantation centers. To implement this system most efficiently and effectively, periodic situation analyses were made.     

Factors influencing the potential organ donation: a 6-yr experience of the New Jersey Organ and Tissue Sharing Network

The demand for organ transplants in the United States is increasing by 16% every year. Unfortunately, organ donation figures are not increasing at the same rate. Factors that influence the process of organ donation in New Jersey were analyzed. METHODS: A retrospective study in which the charts of actual and potential organ donors identified by the New Jersey Organ and Tissue Sharing Network (OTSN) between January 1990 and December 1995 were reviewed. Potential donors who were not identified by the OTNS or the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) were not considered because no data relative to these cases were available. The conversion ratio (CR) between actual donor from potential donor was determined. A statistical analysis of the data was performed using multivariate regression logistic analysis. RESULTS: Organ donation increased, both in the male and female population, by 14% over the last 6 yr. The 0-5-yr age group experienced an increment in CR from 7.7 to 37.7% (p < 0.001). All other age groups had a continuous improvement, but a statistically significant increase over time was not observed. The CR of all races increased over the 6-yr study period. The Afro-American population donated significantly less than the white population (32.1 vs. 59.9%) (p < 0.001). The three transplant centers in New Jersey had a CR less than that seen in the non-transplant centers (38.1 vs. 44.1%). The number of total donations (78.7 vs. 21.3%) was significantly greater in the non-transplant centers (p < 0.001). Moreover, the number of lost donors was higher at transplant centers (p < 0.001). Over the 6-yr period, the difference between donations coming from non-urban (70.8%) versus urban areas (29.27%) was highly significant (p < 0.001). Traumatic deaths were associated with a greater CR (55.3%) than all other causes of death. The CR for donors dying as a result of motor vehicle accidents (MVA) (p < 0.001), penetrating trauma, and child abuse all increased. Level II trauma centers had a better CR (53.7%) than level I centers (48.4%) and non-trauma centers (51.1%). The donation rate was similar for level II and non-trauma centers (60%). CONCLUSIONS: The organ donation rate in New Jersey is not sufficient to meet the needs of organ recipients in New Jersey. Pediatric donations increased considerably, specifically from child abuse. MVA deaths are associated with the greatest CR. Urban areas have a worse CR than non-urban areas, even if they are associated with transplant or trauma     

Rural primary care centers as a source of information about organ donation

INTRODUCTION: Primary care is an important way of promoting health in the community, and this includes organ donation. In rural areas, this way of promoting health acquires special importance. Our objective was to analyze attitudes toward organ donation among primary care workers in rural health centers to assess their importance in circulating information about donation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample, stratified according to job category among the primary care staff (n = 160), of workers in rural areas in our autonomous community (population < 10,000 inhabitants), evaluated attitudes toward donation using a questionnaire validated in our geographic area. To distribute the questionnaire it was necessary to contact the following in each health center: the coordinating physician, the nursing coordinator, and an administrative worker. RESULTS: Of those questioned, 78% (n = 124) were in favor of donation, as opposed to 22% (n = 36) who are against it or undecided. As for the job category, physicians and nurses showed a more favorable attitude than nonhealth workers (90% and 80% vs 61%; P = .000). The psychosocial variables that were related to such an attitude were knowledge of the concept of brain death (P = .013) and lack of fear of manipulation of the deceased person (P = .002). Regarding information about organ donation and transplantation, 54% (n = 86) reported having been provided favorable information, with up to a quarter of the physicians considering other programs to be of greater interest for primary care than organ donation and transplantation. CONCLUSION: Attitudes toward organ donation were favorable among a high percentage of primary care workers in rural centers; more than 50% have circulated favorable information on the subject. However, there is a high percentage with a negative or undecided attitude, especially among nonhealth workers, which should be reversed with promotional activities at the level of the health center.     

Organizzazione Centro-Sud Trapianti: outcome analysis 1999 to 2002

BACKGROUND: The Organizzazione Centro-Sud Trapianti (OCST), which was created in 1998, is organized into eight regional areas, each referring to a local Regional Transplant Coordinating Center. Organs are primarily allocated to meet the demands of transplant centers in each regional area. Urgencies, pediatric grafts, and paybacks are managed by an Interregional Transplant Coordinating Center. The aim of the current work is to report on the impact of introduction of OCST on organ donation and transplant activity over the period from 1999 to 2002. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of donor and transplant data charts over the period from 1999 to 2002 focused on outcome analysis based on donor epidemiological data, cause of death, reasons for discards and grafts performed at OCST local transplant centers. RESULTS: From 1999 to 2002, we observed a remarkable increase in organ donation from 8.8 to 22.5 donors per million people. Donor epidemiology showed an increase in median age and stroke incidence rates and a decrease in trauma cases. The nonharvested donor rate rose steadily over the study period, plateauing at 58%, which was compensated for by a threefold increase in donation. Family oppositions ranged as high as 35.5% on average, despite public efforts to support donation. Transplant activity rose by 76%. CONCLUSIONS: The institution of OCST and the efforts from central and regional authorities have yielded a significant increase in organ donation and transplant activity rates over the period from 1999 to 2002. Major areas of concern are the high opposition rate and the decreasing quality of harvested grafts. Long-term analysis is underway to assess the impact of OCST on the quality of transplants performed in the catchment area.     

Autologous blood transfusion and hemodilution in planned large interventions exemplified by 132 radical prostatectomies]

The hospital records of 132 consecutive patients between May 1988 and August 1991 with biopsy-proven local prostate carcinoma, who were scheduled for radical prostatectomy were reviewed. Seventeen patients had positive lymph nodes at pelvic lymphadenectomy and were subsequently given hormone therapy. The mean blood loss in 115 patients undergoing pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy was 1379 ml. Since September 1988 we have operated a program for predeposit autologous blood donation in all patients prior to radical prostatectomy. Sixty patients were entered into this program and 59 received their autologous blood back during operation. Seventy-eight percent of our patients received only autologous blood. The basis of an efficient autologous blood donation program is a simple logistic schedule for all patients (risk and non-risk), who can choose their dates for autologous blood donation. We hope with this study to encourage other centers to introduce autologous blood donation.     

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

Live donor renal transplantation provides significant advantages when compared with cadaveric renal transplantation. Unfortunately, there are disincentives associated with donation including prolonged hospitalization, significant postoperative pain, and prolonged convalescence. With the advent of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, there has been an increase in live donation at centers performing the procedure secondary. Incentives provided by laparoscopic donation include a reduction in hospital stay, less postoperative analgesic requirements, and an earlier return to normal daily activities. Most importantly, graft function and survival are equivalent to open live donation. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is evolving to become the preferred method of procuring living donor kidneys.     

Organ Donation and Utilization in the United States, 1997–2006

Deceased organ donation has increased rapidly since 2002, coinciding with implementation of the Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative. The increase in donors has resulted in a corresponding increase in the numbers of kidney, liver, lung and intestinal transplants. While transplants for most organs have increased, discard and nonrecovery rates have not improved or have increased, resulting in a decrease in organs recovered per donor (ORPD) and organs transplanted per donor (OTPD). Thus, the expansion of the consent and recovery of incremental donors has frequently outpaced utilization. Meaningful increases in multicultural donation have been achieved, but donations continue to be lower than actual rates of transplantation and waiting list registrations for these groups. To counteract the decline in living donation, mechanisms such as paired donation and enhanced incentives to organ donation are being developed. Current efforts of the collaborative have focused on differentiating ORPD and OTPD targets by donor type (standard and expanded criteria donors and donors after cardiac death), utilization of the OPTN regional structure and enlisting centers to increase transplants to match increasing organ availability.     

Information requested about organ donation in primary health care centers

Information provided by primary care workers about organ donation significantly affects the attitude of the general public. The objective of this study was to evaluate information about donation requested by the general public in health centers in an autonomous community (region) of Spain and to find out how many workers provided relevant information. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A random sample was taken and stratified by sex, job category, and geographical location (six health areas of our autonomous regional community, 45 municipal councils), among primary care health workers in order to obtain a total of 428 respondents in 34 primary care centers. A study was undertaken of information requested and provided about organ donation and transplantation. The chi square test was applied and differences were considered significant at levels of P < .05. RESULTS: Forty-three percent (n=185) of the workers surveyed indicated that information had been requested from them about organ donation and transplantation. This request for information was much greater from physicians than from the other types of workers (P = .015). Furthermore, 54% of primary care health workers (n=229) reported having provided information about donation, especially physicians (64%), with this being mainly favorable. Information had also been provided by nurses (59%) and ancillary staff (34%). CONCLUSION: Information requested from primary care health workers by the general public about organ donation and transplantation is increasing when we compare it to data from previous years. Around half of primary care workers have offered information about transplantation. Therefore, it is fundamental that these workers have adequate and correct information to provide patients and families.     

Living donor kidney transplantation: analysis of the first 40 cases performed in UZ Leuven

Living donation kidney transplantation has been popular worldwide to try to increase the donor pool. In Belgium, the rate of living donation kidney transplantation has been traditionally relatively low compared to other countries. This is--in part--due to the relatively higher cadaveric organ offer that is available in Belgium (around 25 donors per million inhabitants), compared to other countries. However, the increasing waiting times on cadaveric waiting list and the superiority of the results of live donation versus cadaveric kidney transplantation have led to a reappraisal of this strategy. In our center a living donation kidney transplant programme was started in 1997. Since then 40 cases of live donation kidney transplantation have been performed and are reported herein.     

Cadaveric transplantation activities in our centers

Baskent University is one of the most important transplantation centers in Turkey. This study assesses the contribution that Baskent University Hospital Network is currently making to the national solid organ pool. The National Coordinating Center (NCC) was founded in 2001, and data from the Baskent University transplantation center from January 2001 to through May 2005 were retrospectively analyzed. The number of brain-dead patients in this period was 36 and the number of family consent was 20. For all brain-death cases, the rate of consent for donation was 55.6%. Of the 64 total grafts collected in this study period, 85.9% were transplanted at this center and 14.1% were offered to the NCC. The rate of heart and liver grafts offered to the NCC was 9.4% and 4.7%, respectively. According to the results, 29.6% of all heart grafts, 4.5% of all liver grafts, and 4.5% of all kidney grafts in Turkey are performed from donors identified by Baskent University. The current rate of consent for cadaver organ donation is high compared with other centers. The majority of these grafts were used in our center, but we also made some contribution to the national donor organ pool. The transplantation activities in our network will hopefully lead to a larger organ pool and shorter waiting lists.     

Public attitudes toward kidney donation by friends and altruistic strangers in the United States

BACKGROUND: A severe shortage of organs is one of the major barriers facing transplantation today. One promising approach to this serious problem is to increase the use of genetically unrelated living kidney donors. Because of excellent results and favorable ethical considerations, spousal donation has become a widely accepted practice in the United States. The majority of U.S. transplant centers are now also willing to consider friends as donors, but they seem to be less comfortable about this donor source and most centers are opposed to using strangers. This study was designed to see what the public thinks about these issues. METHODS: A telephone survey of 1009 randomly selected adults living in the U.S. was conducted by the Gallup Organization. The survey asked about the acceptability of kidney donation by close friends and altruistic strangers and the willingness of respondents to make such donations themselves. RESULTS: Over 90% of respondents believe that kidney donation by close friends is acceptable and 80% feel the same way about kidney donation by altruistic strangers. Most respondents (76%) would probably donate a kidney to a close friend with renal failure and 24% said they would even donate a kidney to a stranger for free. CONCLUSION: It seems that the vast majority of American adults believe that living kidney donation by friends and altruistic strangers is an acceptable practice and many would consider making such donations themselves. When considered along with excellent results and favorable ethical arguments, these data suggest that kidney donation by friends and altruistic strangers should be considered as acceptable as is donation by spouses.     

Strategies to optimize deceased organ donation

Organ shortage is one of the main limitations to deal with in organ transplantation. Although the number of patients in the waiting list increases over time, the number of transplants performed does not increase or increases at a much lower rate because of the scarcity of organs to fulfil the demands. Several classic approaches have proven to have a limited or transient impact on the figures of organ donation. The sustained increase in deceased organ donation rates in Spain during the last years, reaching values of 33 to 35 donors per million population, obeys to the implementation of a set of measures, mainly of organizational nature, that is internationally known as the Spanish Model of Organ Donation. With the creation of the National Transplant Organization in 1989, always acting as an agency in support of the process of donation besides organ sharing, a network of highly trained and motivated physicians with the main responsibility of developing a proactive donor detection program was established. A continuous audit of brain death in intensive care units of transplant procurement hospitals has been applied in the last 7 years as a valuable tool to evaluate the potential of donation and the weaknesses of the process, identifying areas to be improved. Great effort in training and education, close attention to the mass media, and reimbursement to procurement and transplant centers for the developed activity have been other measures indeed contributing to the successful Spanish results. The application of the Spanish Model of Organ Donation to other regions and countries across the world, such as the region of Tuscany in Northern Italy and some Latin American countries, has proven to be feasible always that minimal requirements are fulfilled. What these figures show is that a positive change in organ donation rates can be achieved if steps are taken into the right direction.     

Information au patient: Traitement chirurgical du cancer du gros intestine

Living donation kidney transplantation has been popular worldwide to try to increase the donor pool. In Belgium, the rate of living donation kidney transplantation has been traditionally relatively low compared to other countries. This is - in part - due to the relatively higher cadaveric organ offer that is available in Belgium (around 25 donors per million inhabitants), compared to other countries. However, the increasing waiting times on cadaveric waiting list and the superiority of the results of live donation versus cadaveric kidney transplantation have led to a reappraisal of this strategy. In our center a living donation kidney transplant programme was started in 1997. Since then 40 cases of live donation kidney transplantation have been performed and are reported herein.     

Cost-benefit approach in evaluating investment into donor action: the German case

Donor Action (DA) is an international initiative to help critical care units (CCUs) increase their own donation rates through improved-quality donation practices. Following a validated diagnostic review (DR), areas of weakness can be identified, and the appropriate changes introduced. Data gathered from a number of centers in nine European countries (including Germany) 1 year after the introduction of targeted improvement measures demonstrated a 59.2% (P=0.0015) increase in donation rates. This analysis computes the cost-benefit thresholds of implementing the DA methodology from a German health-economic point of view, taking into account the treatment alternatives for end-stage renal disease (dialysis and transplantation) and comparing the DA program with current organ-donation practice. Lifetime direct medical costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated for both arms, considering only changes in cadaveric renal transplantation rates. If DA leads to a 59% overall increase in organ donation in Germany, the program will result in 33 QALYs and 1.8-million euro cost savings per million population (PMP). Therefore, DA would be cost-effective below 2.66-million euro implementation cost PMP (or 218-million euro for the whole country). As the partial implementation cost of the program was far below the threshold, DA is more cost-effective than other publicly reimbursed medical intervention.     

The beauty of the gift: the wonder of living organ donation

In a recent opinion piece, Nancy Scheper-Hughes provides a sweeping indictment of living organ donation, even in cases where the gift is directed to a close family member. She describes the process with caustic powerful phrases such as "sacrificial violence" and a "call to 'self-sacrifice.'" She concludes that living organ donation "should be consigned to a back seat as an exceptional back-up to deceased donation." But her conclusions are based on anecdotes and data that are not representative of donor practice and motivation in the United States and other developed countries. At reputable transplant centers great care is taken to identify genuine volunteers and to protect their interests. Under these circumstances living organ donation remains a generally safe and beneficial procedure for the donor as well as the recipient, and a wonderful example of the goodness of people.     

Living Anonymous Liver Donation: Case Report and Ethical Justification

Most living organ donations are from genetically or emotionally related donors. Although some transplant centers are willing to accept donations from living anonymous kidney donors (LAKDs), very few centers will accept donations from living anonymous liver donors (LALDs). The difference in acceptance rates is primarily due to the greater risk in liver donation, which is estimated to be 10-fold that of the risk in kidney donation. We present a case of donation from a LALD, the first reported in Canada. There are currently no established standards for LALDs. Our criteria for the ethical acceptability of LALDs require such donors to be physically healthy, mentally competent, altruistic, highly motivated, well-informed and able to give voluntary consent to donation. Another major ethical criterion is that the likely psychological benefit to the LALD balances the physical risks. Our case demonstrates that transplants from LALDs are medically successful and ethically justified under certain conditions.