Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials

This study evaluates the efficacy of capecitabine using data from a large, well-characterised population of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated in two identically designed phase III studies. A total of 1207 patients with previously untreated mCRC were randomised to either oral capecitabine (1250 mg m(-2) twice daily, days 1-14 every 21 days; n=603) or intravenous (i.v.) bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV; Mayo Clinic regimen; n=604). Capecitabine demonstrated a statistically significant superior response rate compared with 5-FU/LV (26 vs 17%; P<0.0002). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that capecitabine consistently resulted in superior response rates (P<0.05), even in patient subgroups with poor prognostic indicators. The median time to response and duration of response were similar and time to progression (TTP) was equivalent in the two arms (hazard ratio (HR) 0.997, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.885-1.123, P=0.95; median 4.6 vs 4.7 months with capecitabine and 5-FU/LV, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified younger age, liver metastases, multiple metastases and poor Karnofsky Performance Status as independent prognostic indicators for poor TTP. Overall survival was equivalent in the two arms (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84-1.06, P=0.48; median 12.9 vs 12.8 months, respectively). Capecitabine results in superior response rate, equivalent TTP and overall survival, an improved safety profile and improved convenience compared with i.v. 5-FU/LV as first-line treatment for MCRC. For patients in whom fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is indicated, capecitabine should be strongly considered. Following encouraging results from phase I and II trials, randomised trials are evaluating capecitabine in combination with irinotecan, oxaliplatin and radiotherapy. Capecitabine is a suitable replacement for i.v. 5-FU as the backbone of colorectal cancer therapy.     

A randomised cross-over trial comparing patient preference for oral capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin regimens in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) has been treated with intravenous (i.v.) 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV). The tumour-activated, oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine demonstrates superior activity and favourable safety compared with the Mayo regimen, while potentially avoiding the complications and inconvenience associated with i.v. regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-seven patients with previously untreated advanced/MCRC were randomised to receive capecitabine followed by i.v. 5-FU/LV [Mayo Clinic, in-patient de Gramont (IPdG) or out-patient modified de Gramont (OPdG) regimens], or i.v. 5-FU/LV followed by capecitabine. RESULTS: Before treatment, of those patients for whom a preference was recorded, almost all (95%) preferred oral treatment (consistent across all treatment groups) and the majority retained this preference after treatment (64% overall; 86%, 63% and 50% in the Mayo, IPdG and OPdG groups, respectively). Following treatment, the principal reasons for oral treatment preference were increased convenience, home-based administration and tablet formulation. Treatment satisfaction was significantly higher with capecitabine compared with Mayo (P<0.05) and with OPdG compared with capecitabine (P<0.05). Quality of life (QoL) was largely constant across the regimens, although it appeared better with OPdG than capecitabine (P<0.05). Grade 3/4 adverse events were uncommon in all arms. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that the majority of patients with MCRC prefer oral to i.v. therapy, although the OPdG regimen appears to be the most popular i.v. option. Capecitabine clearly represents an effective, well-tolerated oral alternative to i.v. 5-FU/LV.     

Randomised, phase II trial comparing oral capecitabine (Xeloda) with paclitaxel in patients with metastatic/advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines

Capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, was designed to generate 5-fluorouracil preferentially at the tumour site. This randomised, phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of capecitabine or paclitaxel in patients with anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Outpatients with locally advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer whose disease was unresponsive or resistant to anthracycline therapy were randomised to 3-week cycles of intermittent oral capecitabine (1255 mg m(-2) twice daily, days 1-14, (22 patients)) or a reference arm of i.v. paclitaxel (175 mg m(-2), (20 patients)). Two additional patients were initially randomised to continuous capecitabine 666 mg m(-2) twice daily, but this arm was closed following selection of the intermittent schedule for further development. Overall response rate was 36% (95% CI 17-59%) with capecitabine (including three complete responses) and 26% (95% CI 9-51%) with paclitaxel (no complete responses). Median time to disease progression was similar in the two treatment groups (3.0 months with capecitabine, 3.1 months with paclitaxel), as was overall survival (7.6 and 9.4 months, respectively). Paclitaxel was associated with more alopecia, peripheral neuropathy, myalgia and neutropenia, whereas typical capecitabine-related adverse events were diarrhoea, vomiting and hand-foot syndrome. Twenty-three per cent of capecitabine-treated patients and 16% of paclitaxel-treated patients achieved a > or =10% improvement in Karnofsky Performance Status. Oral capecitabine is active in anthracycline-pretreated advanced/metastatic breast cancer and has a favourable safety profile. Furthermore, capecitabine provides a convenient, patient-orientated therapy.     

Oxaliplatin combined with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (OCFL) in metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase I-II study.

BACKGROUND: A phase I-II multicenter trial was conducted to define the maximal tolerated dose and describe the activity of an OCFL combination using oxaliplatin (OHP), irinotecan (CPT-11) and 5-fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: CRC patients not pretreated with palliative chemotherapy, with performance status < or =1 and adequate haematological, kidney and liver function, were eligible. Treatment consisted in weekly 24-h infusion 5-FU (2300 mg/m(2))/LV (30 mg) and alternating OHP (70-85 mg/m(2), days 1 and 15) and CPT-11 (80-140 mg/m(2), days 8 and 22) repeated every 5 weeks. OHP and CPT-11 were escalated in cohorts of three to six patients. RESULTS: Thirty patients received a median of five cycles. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred at dose level 3, and the recommended dose was OHP 70 mg/m(2), CPT-11 100 mg/m(2), LV 30 mg and 5-FU 2300 mg/m(2)/24 h. Grade > or =3 toxicities were diarrhea 23%, neutropenia 20%, fatigue 7%, and neurologic 7%. Two febrile neutropenia episodes (one fatal) were recorded. Among 28 patients with measurable disease (90%), we observed two complete and 20 partial responses; overall RR was 78% (95% CI, 59% to 92%). Median time to progression and overall survival were 9.5 and 25.4 months, respectively. Seven patients underwent liver metastases resection. CONCLUSION: OCFL is an overall well tolerated regimen with very high efficacy, which makes it most suitable for tumour control before surgery of metastatic disease.     

First-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with irinotecan, oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOXIRI): results of a phase II study with a simplified biweekly schedule.

BACKGROUND: In a previous phase I-II study we demonstrated that the FOLFOXIRI regimen [irinotecan 125-175 mg/m2 day 1, oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1, l-leucovorin (l-LV) 200 mg/m2 day 1, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 3800 mg/m2 as a 48-h chronomodulated continuous infusion starting on day 1, repeated every 2 weeks] has promising activity and efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer. However, this regimen required a chronomodulated infusion of 5-FU, and because neutropenia occurred in 32% of cycles, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was used and the delivered dose intensity was only approximately 78% of planned. Therefore, we conducted the present phase II study in order to develop a simplified FOLFOXIRI regimen that could be more easily administered in clinical practice as well as in multicenter settings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 32 patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer received irinotecan 165 mg/m2 day 1, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 day 1, l-LV 200 mg/m2 day 1 and 5-FU 3200 mg/m2 as a 48-h continuous (not chronomodulated) infusion starting on day 1, repeated every 2 weeks. RESULTS: All 32 patients were evaluated for safety and the incidence of grade 3-4 toxic effects, and the use of G-CSF seemed to be lower than with the previous FOLFOXIRI regimen: grade 4 neutropenia (34%), grade 3 diarrhea (16%), grade 3 stomatitis (6%) and grade 2-3 peripheral neurotoxicity (37%) were reported, and G-CSF was used in 23% of cycles. Delivered dose intensity was 88% of that planned, and no toxic deaths occurred. The intention-to-treat analysis for activity showed four complete responses, 19 partial responses, seven stable disease and two progressive disease, for an overall response rate of 72% (95% confidence interval 53% to 86%). Eight (25%) patients with residual liver or lung metastases were radically resected after chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 18.1 months, the median progression-free survival is 10.8 months and median survival is 28.4 months. CONCLUSIONS: This simplified FOLFOXIRI combination can be delivered easily in outpatient settings, with manageable toxic effects, and has very promising antitumor activity. While the safety profile seems to be improved in comparison with our previous FOLFOXIRI regimen, antitumor activity and efficacy appear to be maintained.     

Capecitabine (Xeloda) in combination with oxaliplatin: a phase I, dose-escalation study in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors.

OBJECTIVES: This phase I, dose-escalation study was conducted to determine the recommended dose of intermittent oral capecitabine in combination with a fixed dose of i.v. oxaliplatin. Secondary objectives included evaluation of the safety profile and antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors received a 21-day regimen of oral capecitabine (500, 825, 1000 or 1250 mg/m2 twice daily, days 1-14) in combination with oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2, 2-h i.v. infusion, day 1). Dose-limiting toxicities were determined during the first treatment cycle, and safety and efficacy were evaluated throughout treatment. RESULTS: The recommended dosing schedule is oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily (days 1-14) with i.v. oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 (day 1) in a 21-day treatment cycle. The principal dose-limiting toxicity was diarrhea. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events occurring during the study were gastrointestinal (nausea/vomiting, diarrhea) and neurological (dysesthesia, paresthesia). The majority of treatment-related adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity, and no grade 4 adverse events occurred in the 15 patients treated at or below the recommended dose. The most common grade 3/4 laboratory abnormalities were lymphocytopenia (52% of patients), thrombocytopenia (22%; grade 3 only), neutropenia (17%) and hyperbilirubinemia (17%). Among patients treated at or below the recommended dose level (n = 15), only two patients experienced grade 3 neutropenia and no patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia. Partial tumor responses occurred in six patients (26%), including five of nine patients (55%) with colorectal cancer. All responding patients were pretreated with 5-fluorouracil and four responders had received prior irinotecan. CONCLUSIONS: Oral capecitabine with i.v. oxaliplatin is a feasible combination regimen that shows promising antitumor activity in patients with colorectal cancer. There is an ongoing, phase II study to further characterize the safety and efficacy of this combination as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, using the recommended dose identified in this study.     

Single-agent capecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness of capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, is well documented in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients (overall response rate: 25%). However, its efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) has not been determined. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and to identify the side-effects of capecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer showing progression despite 5-FU/LV-based combination chemotherapy. METHODS: Fifty-one metastatic colorectal cancer patients who showed progressive disease in 5-FU/LV-containing regimens (median: two regimes) were treated with capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily (days 1-14 repeated every 3 weeks). RESULTS: Only one partial response was observed (response rate: 2%). Twenty-seven patients (53%) showed stable disease after two cycles. The median time to disease progression of either a partial response or stable disease was 3.4 months. Hand-foot syndrome was the main toxicity of capecitabine and occurred in 35% of cases (grade 3 or 4 in 6%). The median number of cycles administered was two and the relative dose intensity of capecitabine was 80%. CONCLUSION: The response rate to capecitabine was low in metastatic colorectal cancers that were refractory to 5-FU/LV-containing chemotherapy. However, disease stabilization was seen in a significant number of patients.     

Short-time infusion of oxaliplatin in combination with capecitabine (XELOX30) as second-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer after failure to irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine (XELOX) as second-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC) resistant to irinotecan is not well established. Oxaliplatin induces acute, cold-induced neuropathy in most patients. The incidence is claimed to be infusion rate-dependent and therefore a 2-h infusion is recommended. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For practical and economic reasons, but also for patient's convenience, we performed a phase II study to examine XELOX30 (capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1-14 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 as a 30 min infusion on day 1) in patients with ACRC resistant to irinotecan. In addition the pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin was studied. RESULTS: From November 2002 to September 2003, 70 patients with ACRC were treated with XELOX30. Median age was 62 (range 33-74 years) years and median performance status was 1 (range 0-2). The median number of courses was four (range 1-12) and median cumulative dose of oxaliplatin was 530 (range 125-1560) mg/m2. The response rate was 17% (95% CI 10-23), median time to progression (TTP) was 5.4 months (95% CI 4.6-6.4) and median survival 9.5 months (95% CI 8.5-11.2). White blood cell count (WBC) and performance status were significantly correlated to TTP. Neurotoxicity was moderate: grade 1 56%, grade 2 17% and grade 3 6%. Other grade 3 toxicities were nausea/vomiting 9%, diarrhoea 14% and PPE 8%. The maximum blood concentration and total body clearance of oxaliplatin was higher than previously reported in studies examining 2-h infusions, but the volume of distribution and terminal half-life was in close agreement with previous results. CONCLUSION: XELOX30 is a very convenient second-line regimen in ACRC with an activity and safety profile similar to other oxaliplatin schedules.     

The clinical and economic benefits of capecitabine and tegafur with uracil in metastatic colorectal cancer

Two oral fluoropyrimidine therapies have been introduced for metastatic colorectal cancer. One is a 5-fluorouracil pro-drug, capecitabine; the other is a combination of tegafur and uracil administered together with leucovorin. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these oral therapies against standard intravenous 5-fluorouracil regimens. A systematic literature review was conducted to assess the clinical effectiveness of the therapies and costs were calculated from the UK National Health Service perspective for drug acquisition, drug administration, and the treatment of adverse events. A cost-minimisation analysis was used; this assumes that the treatments are of equal efficacy, although direct randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparisons of the oral therapies with infusional 5-fluorouracil schedules were not available. The cost-minimisation analysis showed that treatment costs for a 12-week course of capecitabine (Pounds 2132) and tegafur with uracil (Pounds 3385) were lower than costs for the intravenous Mayo regimen (Pounds 3593) and infusional regimens on the de Gramont (Pounds 6255) and Modified de Gramont (Pounds 3485) schedules over the same treatment period. Oral therapies result in lower costs to the health service than intravenous therapies. Further research is needed to determine the relative clinical effectiveness of oral therapies vs infusional regimens.     

Oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin or capecitabine in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the outcome of 140 patients aged > or = 70 years of age who received first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer within the German phase III trial of FUFOX (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin) versus CAPOX (capecitabine/oxaliplatin). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred forty (30%) elderly patients of 476 total patients were identified, and 138 patients received the CAPOX or FUFOX treatment. RESULTS: Overall, treatment was well tolerated, and grade 3/4 toxicities were similar in both groups, with more gastrointestinal side effects in the elderly group but less neurosensory side effects. The response rate (RR) was comparable between both cohorts (49% in elderly patients vs. 52% in patients aged < 70 years). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months for patients aged > or = 70 years and 7.5 months for patients aged < 70 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% CI, 0.86-1.34). With regard to the chemotherapy regimen, there was no inferiority between FUFOX and CAPOX in patients aged > or = 70 years (7.9 months vs. 7.6 months). The median overall survival (OS) between FUFOX and CAPOX was comparable in patients aged > or = 70 years (14.4 months vs. 14.2 months). However, when compared with patients aged < 70 years, the median OS was significantly shorter (18.8 months vs. 14.4 months; P = 0.013; HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.07-1.76). This was consistent with our multivariate analysis, which revealed that age > or = 70 years was a negative factor for OS. CONCLUSION: Oxaliplatin combined with 5-FU/leucovorin or capecitabine was generally well tolerated in elderly patients. Elderly patients had similar PFS and overall RRs compared with the population aged < 70 years, but the OS was shorter.     

First-line treatment with oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal cancer: a phase II study

This phase II study assessed the safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer. Fifty-one eligible patients received oxaliplatin 130 mg m(-2) intravenously on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) orally twice daily on days 1 to 14 in a 21-day treatment cycle as first-line treatment for advanced oesophageal cancer. Grade 3 neutropenia was seen in one patient and anaemia in another patient. No grade 4 haematological toxicities were observed. Grade 4 non-haematological toxicity (lethargy) occurred in one patient (2%). Grade 3 non-haematological toxicity was seen in 14 (27%) patients (vomiting and polyneuropathy (8%); nausea (6%); lethargy and hand-foot syndrome (4%); and anorexia, diarrhoea, and hyperbilirubinaemia (each in one patient)). In 22% of the patients, toxicity was the reason for stopping the treatment. The overall response rate was 39%. The median overall survival was 8 months; the 1-year survival rate was 26%. In the quality of life (QoL) analysis, the emotional well-being improved during treatment, but the physical functioning scores declined. The fatigue score on the symptom scales increased. Overall, the global QoL score did not change during treatment. In conclusion, the activity of oxaliplatin and capecitabine is comparable with other chemotherapy regimens in advanced oesophageal cancer with a low frequency of grade 3/4 toxicity. Because this treatment can be given on an outpatient basis, it is probably less toxic than cisplatin-based therapy and preserves QoL during treatment, it is a viable treatment option in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer.     

Comparing safety and efficacy of first‐line irinotecan/fluoropyrimidine combinations in elderly versus nonelderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND:

Irinotecan‐based chemotherapy regimens are 1 option for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The authors report the safety and efficacy of such regimens in elderly patients using a large phase III trial (bolus, infusional, or capecitabine with camptostar‐celecoxib &#91;BICC‐C&#93;) cohort.

METHODS:

In period 1, 430 previously untreated patients with mCRC were randomized in a 3‐by‐2 design to receive irinotecan plus infusional 5‐fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI), irinotecan plus bolus 5‐fluorouracil/leucovorin (mIFL), and irinotecan plus oral capecitabine (CapeIRI). In period 2, an additional 117 patients were randomized to receive FOLFIRI or mIFL and bevacizumab. In both periods patients were also randomized to a double‐blind treatment with celecoxib or placebo. A secondary analysis was conducted examining the safety and efficacy of these regimens in elderly (age >70 years) versus nonelderly (age ≤70 years) patients.

RESULTS:

In period 1, 19.5% of patients were elderly, compared with 24.8% in period 2. Rates of grade 3 and higher toxicity did not differ significantly between age groups in either period by treatment arm, with the exception of asthenia in the FOLFIRI and CapeIRI arms (P = .05 and P = .03, respectively) and dehydration in the CapeIRI arm in period 1 (P = .02). Overall progression‐free survival for FOLFIRI in both periods was not statistically different by age. Objective responses and overall survival did not differ by patient age within treatment arms and periods.

CONCLUSIONS:

Irinotecan/fluoropyrimidine combinations are well tolerated in the elderly population, with similar efficacy to that found in nonelderly patients in first‐line mCRC. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

Oxaliplatin, irinotecan and capecitabine as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a dose-finding study and pharmacogenomic analysis

Background:

A dose-finding study was performed to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose (RD) of escalating the doses of capecitabine and fixed doses of irinotecan and oxaliplatin on a biweekly schedule for metastatic colorectal cancer patients (mCRC). A pharmacogenomic analysis was performed to investigate the association between SNPs and treatment outcome.

Methods:

Eighty-seven chemotherapy-naïve mCRC patients were recruited through a two-step study design; 27 were included in the dose-finding study and 60 in the pharmacogenomic analysis. Oxaliplatin (85 mg m^-2) and CPT-11 (150 mg m^-2), both on day 1, and capecitabine doses ranging from 850 to 1500 mg m^-2 bid on days 1–7 were explored. Peripheral blood samples were used to genotype 13 SNPs in 10 genes related to drug metabolism or efficacy. Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis was performed to examine associations between SNPs, ORR and PFS.

Results:

The capecitabine RD was 1000 mg m⁻² bid. Diarrhoea and neutropenia were the DLTs. After a median follow-up of 52.5 months, the median PFS and OS were 12 (95% CI; 10.6–13.4) and 27 months (95% CI; 17.2–36.8), respectively.The GSTP1-G genotype, the Köhne low-risk category and use of a consolidation approach strongly correlated with decreased risk of progression. Patients with all favourable variables showed a median PFS of 42 months vs 3.4 months in the group with all adverse factors. A superior clinical response was obtained in patients with one GSTP1-G allele as compared with GSTP1-AA carriers (P=0.004).

Conclusion:

First-line therapy with oxaliplatin, irinotecan and capecitabine is efficient and well-tolerated. The GSTP1 polymorphism A>G status was significantly associated with ORR and PFS in mCRC treated with this triplet therapy.     

A phase II Study of the global dose and schedule of capecitabine in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Although the standard 3-week capecitabine regimen (1250 mg/m(2) twice daily for 2 weeks followed by a 1-week rest) has shown superior activity and improved safety over bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in two large randomized phase III trials in Europe and in the United States, only a 4-week regimen of capecitabine (828 mg/m(2) twice daily for 3 weeks) has been studied in Japan. Therefore, we performed a phase II study to investigate the 3-week regimen of capecitabine in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). METHODS: Previously untreated patients with MCRC received oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily for 2 weeks. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Blood and urine samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis. RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled. The overall response rate was 35% [95% confidence interval (CI), 23-48%], and 52% of patients had stable disease. The median time to progression was 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.2-6.7 months). The median overall survival was 20.2 months (95% CI, 16.6-27.8 months). The most frequently occurring adverse drug reaction was hand-foot syndrome (all-grade 73%; grade 3 13%). Diarrhea, anorexia, nausea and stomatitis were each seen in 37% of patients. The pharmacokinetic profiles of capecitabine and its metabolites were similar to those reported in Caucasian patients. CONCLUSIONS: The 3-week regimen of capecitabine was effective and well tolerated in Japanese patients with MCRC as well, and could be used as the basic regimen for future combination therapies.     

Toxicity associated with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer before and after an institutional policy of capecitabine dose reduction

Background:

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) is an established treatment option in colorectal cancer, but can be associated with severe toxicities.

Methods:

Following reporting of severe diarrhoea and dehydration with capecitabine 2000 mg m^–2 per day plus oxaliplatin every 3 weeks (CAPOX 2000) in 2006, we instituted a policy change to reduce capecitabine dose to 1700 mg m^–2 per day (CAPOX 1700). We undertook a retrospective analysis comparing toxicities encountered before and after this dose change.

Results:

Of the 400 patients treated, no significant differences were seen between the CAPOX 2000 and CAPOX 1700 in grades 3 and 4 diarrhoea (21% vs 19% P=0.80), stomatitis (0% vs 1% P=0.50) or grades 2–4 hand foot syndrome (16% vs 11% P=0.18). Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia (9.5% vs 3.5% P=0.03) and all grades hyperbilirubinaemia (60% vs 40% P<0.0001) were significantly reduced with CAPOX 1700. Rates of hospitalisation due to toxicities were not different between two groups (13% vs 11% P=0.53).

Conclusions:

No clinically or statistically significant differences in gastrointestinal toxicities or hospitalisation rate were seen after reducing our routine capecitabine dose from CAPOX 2000 to CAPOX 1700.     

A phase Ib dose-escalation study of erlotinib, capecitabine and oxaliplatin in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Dysregulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (HER1/EGFR) has been reported in colorectal cancer (CRC). Erlotinib is a potent inhibitor of HER1/EGFR-mediated signaling. This trial of patients with metastatic CRC (MCRC) examined the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of erlotinib in combination with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX), a regimen with established efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients previously untreated or treated with one line of 5-fluorouracil and/or irinotecan received escalating oral doses of erlotinib (daily), capecitabine (days 1-14) and i.v. oxaliplatin (day 1 of a 21-day cycle). RESULTS: The first six patients in cohort 1 (erlotinib 100 mg/day, capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2)) had no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). In cohort 2 (capecitabine increased to 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily), two of six patients had DLTs. When cohort 2 was expanded to 11 patients two further DLTs occurred, exceeding the definition of MTD. Cohort 1 was expanded to 12 patients, and no DLTs occurred. The most common adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea and rash. There was a trend for reduced capecitabine concentrations in the presence of erlotinib. While this was not statistically significant, the possibility of an interaction affecting capecitabine PK cannot be excluded. Antitumor activity was observed in both cohorts (one complete and four partial responses, and stable disease in 11 patients). CONCLUSION: The MTD for this combination in MCRC is capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily days 1-14, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) day 1 and erlotinib 100 mg/day of a 21-day cycle. The combination was well tolerated at the MTD, with no unexpected AEs. The use of this combination in MCRC warrants further investigation.     

国产奥沙利铂联合亚叶酸钙和5-氟脲嘧啶治疗晚期结直肠癌的临床观察

目的：评价奥沙利铂联合亚叶酸钙、5—氟脲嘧啶(OXA—CF—5—Fu)方案治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性。方法：奥沙利铂(OXA)130mg／m^2，静脉滴注4h，d1；亚叶酸钙(CF)200mg静脉滴注2小时，5—氟脲嘧啶(5—Fu)0．25g于CF滴完后静脉推注，5-Fu0．5g持续静脉滴注6-8小时，d1-5，每3周重复。结果：全组26例患者，有效率(CR PR)为42．31％，不良反应为恶心、呕吐和骨髓抑制，但多为Ⅰ～Ⅱ度，一过性感觉异常。结论：奥沙利铂联合亚叶酸钙和5—氟脲嘧啶治疗晚期结直肠癌疗效较高，不良反应轻而且安全。     

A phase II study of fixed-dose capecitabine and assessment of predictors of toxicity in patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and activity of fixed-dose capecitabine in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and to correlate pretreatment plasma concentrations of homocysteine and serum and red cell folate with toxicity. Patients received capecitabine 2000 mg (4 x 500 mg tablets) twice daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks. They were reviewed weekly during the first cycle and then three weekly for safety assessment. Eligibility criteria were advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer, < or = 2 prior chemotherapy regimens, ECOG performance status 0-2 and life expectancy >12 weeks. A total of 60 patients were enrolled and 55 were evaluable for efficacy. The median age was 72 years and 63% of patients had a performance status of 1 or 2. Confirmed tumour responses were reported in 15 patients (28%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 15.7-40.3%). The median time to disease progression was 4.9 months and median overall survival was 11.2 months. The median ratio of fixed dose to body surface area (BSA)-calculated dose was 88% (range 65-108%). Significant myelosuppression was not observed. Grade 2/3 treatment-related adverse events were diarrhoea (34%), fatigue (27%), stomatitis (15%) and hand-foot syndrome (22%). Dose reduction due to adverse events was required in 16 patients (29%) and multiple reductions in five patients (9%). There was no grade 3/4 haematological toxicity, any grade 4 adverse events or treatment-related deaths. Patients with higher pretreatment levels of serum folate experienced significantly greater toxicity (P = 0.02, CI: 1.0-1.2) during cycle 1 and over the entire treatment period (P = 0.04, CI: 1.0-1.3). Pretreatment homocysteine concentrations did not predict for toxicity. In conclusion, fixed-dose capecitabine appears to have similar efficacy and safety compared to the currently recommended dose schedule based on body surface area and simplifies drug administration. A high pretreatment folate may be predictive of increased toxicity from capecitabine.     

Systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: current questions

A proliferation of new cytotoxic and biologic agents has led to improved survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The ability of surgery to increase long-term survival in patients with liver and/or lung metastases also has been firmly established. It has become increasingly difficult as the numbers and types of treatment options have expanded to identify optimal drug combinations, sequences, and duration and the best way to integrate systemic chemotherapy with potentially curative surgery for metastatic lesions. For this review, the authors examined how recent clinical trials have addressed some pertinent questions regarding the use of systemic chemotherapy and biologic agents in patients with mCRC.