Skin pigmentary anomalies and mosaicism for an acentric marker chromosome originating from 3q

We report on a 22 year old man with hyperpigmentation distributed along the lines of Blaschko in whom cytogenetic analysis showed mosaicism for an unusual supernumerary marker chromosome. The patient was of normal intelligence and was not dysmorphic. The marker was present in 30% of his lymphocytes and in 6% of his skin fibroblasts from a dark area, while fibroblasts from a light area showed a normal karyotype, 46,XY. We have identified the origin of the marker using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with whole chromosome painting probes and YAC specific clones. The marker was found to consist of duplicated chromosome material from the distal part of chromosome 3q and was interpreted as inv dup(3)(qter-->q27.1::q27.1-->qter). Hence, this marker did not include any known centromeric region and no alpha satellite DNA could be detected at the site of the primary constriction. The patient was therefore tetrasomic for 3q27-q29 in the cells containing the marker chromosome. We postulate that, in our case, pigmentary anomalies may result directly from the gain of specific pigmentation genes localised on chromosome 3q.     

Molecular confirmation of germ line mosaicism for a submicroscopic deletion of chromosome 22q11

Submicroscopic deletions of chromosome 22q11 have been reported in a multiple anomaly syndrome variously labelled as velocardiofacial syndrome, conotruncal anomaly face syndrome, and Di George syndrome. Most 22q11 microdeletions occur sporadically, although in some cases the deletion may be transmitted. We describe two affected sibs with confirmed 22q11 deletions from unaffected parents who are not deleted. Haplotype analysis demonstrates that the deletion in the affected sibs has occurred on the same maternal chromosome 22. Furthermore, an unaffected sib was found to have inherited the same maternal haplotype at 22q11 in an undeleted form. This is the first molecular demonstration of germ line mosaicism for a microdeletion at chromosome 22q11 and highlights the need for caution in estimation of recurrence risks, even when constitutional deletions have been excluded on parental analysis. Am. J. Med. Genet. 78:103–106, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Mosaic 22q13 deletions: evidence for concurrent mosaic segmental isodisomy and gene conversion

Although 22q terminal deletions are well documented, very few patients with mosaicism have been reported. We describe two new cases with mosaic 22q13.2-qter deletion, detected by karyotype analysis, showing the neurological phenotype of 22q13.3 deletion syndrome. Case 1 represents an exceptional case of mosaicism for maternal 22q13.2-qter deletion (45% of cells) and 22q13.2-qter paternal segmental isodisomy (55% of cells). This complex situation was suspected because cytogenetic, FISH and array-CGH analyses showed the presence of an 8.8 Mb mosaic 22q13.2-qter deletion, whereas microsatellite marker analysis was consistent with maternal deletion without any evidence of mosaic deletion. Molecular analysis led to the definition of very close, but not coincident, deletion and uniparental disomy (UPD) break points. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the segmental UPD arose by gene conversion in the same region. In Case 2, mosaicism for a paternal 8.9 Mb 22q13.2-qter deletion (73% of cells) was detected. In both patients, the level of mosaicism was also verified in saliva samples. We propose possible causative mechanisms for both rearrangements. Although the size of the deletions was quite similar, the phenotype was more severe in Case 2 than in Case 1. As maternal UPD 22 has not been generally associated with any defects and as the size of the deletion is very similar in the two cases, phenotype severity is likely to depend entirely on the degree of mosaicism in each individual.     

Genomic characterization of prenatally detected chromosomal structural abnormalities using oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization

Detection of chromosomal structural abnormalities using conventional cytogenetic methods poses a challenge for prenatal genetic counseling due to unpredictable clinical outcomes and risk of recurrence. Of the 1,726 prenatal cases in a 3-year period, we performed oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on 11 cases detected with various structural chromosomal abnormalities. In nine cases, genomic aberrations and gene contents involving a 3p distal deletion, a marker chromosome from chromosome 4, a derivative chromosome 5 from a 5p/7q translocation, a de novo distal 6q deletion, a recombinant chromosome 8 comprised of an 8p duplication and an 8q deletion, an extra derivative chromosome 9 from an 8p/9q translocation, mosaicism for chromosome 12q with added material of initially unknown origin, an unbalanced 13q/15q rearrangement, and a distal 18q duplication and deletion were delineated. An absence of pathogenic copy number changes was noted in one case with a de novo 11q/14q translocation and in another with a familial insertion of 21q into a 19q. Genomic characterization of the structural abnormalities aided in the prediction of clinical outcomes. These results demonstrated the value of aCGH analysis in prenatal cases with subtle or complex chromosomal rearrangements. Furthermore, a retrospective analysis of clinical indications of our prenatal cases showed that approximately 20% of them had abnormal ultrasound findings and should be considered as high risk pregnancies for a combined chromosome and aCGH analysis.     

Somatic mosaicism detected by exon-targeted,high-resolution aCGH in 10?362 consecutive cases

Somatic chromosomal mosaicism arising from post-zygotic errors is known to cause several well-defined genetic syndromes as well as contribute to phenotypic variation in diseases. However, somatic mosaicism is often under-diagnosed due to challenges in detection. We evaluated 10 362 patients with a custom-designed, exon-targeted whole-genome oligonucleotide array and detected somatic mosaicism in a total of 57 cases (0.55%). The mosaicism was characterized and confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or chromosome analysis. Different categories of abnormal cell lines were detected: (1) aneuploidy, including sex chromosome abnormalities and isochromosomes (22 cases), (2) ring or marker chromosomes (12 cases), (3) single deletion/duplication copy number variations (CNVs) (11 cases), (4) multiple deletion/duplication CNVs (5 cases), (5) exonic CNVs (4 cases), and (6) unbalanced translocations (3 cases). Levels of mosaicism calculated based on the array data were in good concordance with those observed by FISH (10–93%). Of the 14 cases evaluated concurrently by chromosome analysis, mosaicism was detected solely by the array in 4 cases (29%). In summary, our exon-targeted array further expands the diagnostic capability of high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization in detecting mosaicism for cytogenetic abnormalities as well as small CNVs in disease-causing genes.     

Discordant phenotypes in a mother and daughter with mosaic supernumerary ring chromosome 19 explained by a de novo 7q36.2 deletion and 7p22.1 duplication

We report on a patient with severe intellectual disability, microcephaly, short stature, and dysmorphic features who, based on standard karyotyping, has two cytogenetic abnormalities: an apparently balanced paracentric inversion of chromosome 7, inv(7)(q31.2q36), and a small supernumerary ring chromosome derived entirely of material from chromosome 19. While the inversion was detected in all cells, mosaicism was observed for the ring chromosome. Interestingly, apparently identical cytogenetic abnormalities were detected in the patient's mother, who presented with normal stature, few dysmorphic features, and normal cognition without microcephaly. While the level of mosaicism could not adequately explain the phenotypic discordance, comparative genome hybridization revealed a de novo terminal deletion of chromosome 7, del(7)(q36.2), and a terminal duplication of chromosome 7, dup(7)(p22.1) in the patient. Additional cytogenetic investigation revealed that the patient inherited a recombinant chromosome derived from a cryptic maternal pericentric inversion: inv(7)(p22q36). The patient's distinctive features are consistent with the wide phenotypic spectrum reported in 7p duplication and 7q terminal deletion syndromes. These chromosomal regions contain several candidate genes of clinical significance, including SHH, EN2, and FAM20C. Our findings strongly suggest that our patient's phenotype is largely attributable to partial 7pter trisomy and partial 7qter monosomy rather than mosaic supernumerary ring chromosome 19.     

Deletion of chromosome 15 (q11 – 13) in a Prader-Labhart-Willi syndrome clinic population

Deletion of the long arm of chromosome 15 has recently been reported in a number of patients with the Prader-Labhart-Willi syndrome who were studied with prometaphase banding. We performed cytogenetic analysis on 12 patients with this disorder in whom the clinical diagnosis was certain. A specific cytogenetic anomaly, del(15q11 – 13) was found in all of the 12 patients. In nine of the 12, the deletion was noted in all cells examined; in two, there was mosaicism, some cells having the deletion and others being normal; one patient had a 7;15 translocation. No clinical differences were evident between individuals with mosaicism for the translocation and those with the typical deletion in all cells examined. The finding that all of our patients with Prader-Labhart-Willi syndrome have a cytogenetic anomaly, with some patients having mosaicism, distinguishes the results of this study from those of previous reports. Prometaphase chromosome analysis is recommended in all individuals clinically suspected of having Prader-Labhart-Willi syndrome and should be considered in hypotonic infants without a specific diagnosis.     

Deletion of chromosome 15 (q11-13) in a Prader-Labhart-Willi syndrome clinic population

Deletion of the long arm of chromosome 15 has recently been reported in a number of patients with the Prader-Labhart-Willi syndrome who were studied with prometaphase banding. We performed cytogenetic analysis on 12 patients with this disorder in whom the clinical diagnosis was certain. A specific cytogenetic anomaly, del(15q11-13) was found in all of the 12 patients. In nine of the 12, the deletion was noted in all cells examined; in two, there was mosaicism, some cells having the deletion and others being normal; one patient had a 7;15 translocation. No clinical differences were evident between individuals with mosaicism for the translocation and those with the typical deletion in all cells examined. The finding that all of our patients with Prader-Labhart-Willi syndrome have a cytogenetic anomaly, with some patients having mosaicism, distinguishes the results of this study from those of previous reports. Prometaphase chromosome analysis is recommended in all individuals clinically suspected of having Prader-Labhart-Willi syndrome and should be considered in hypotonic infants without a specific diagnosis.     

Mosaicism del(22)(q11.2q11.2)/dup(22)(q11.2q11.2) in a patient with features of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome

The chromosome 22q11 region is prone to rearrangements, including deletions and duplications, due to the presence of multiple low copy repeats (LCRs). DiGeorge/velo-cardio-facial syndrome is the most common microdeletion syndrome with more than 90% of patients having a common 3-Mb deletion of 22q11.2 secondary to non-homologous recombination of flanking LCRs. Meiotic reciprocal events caused by LCR-mediated rearrangement should theoretically lead to an equal number of deletions and duplications. Duplications of this region, however, have been infrequently reported and vary in size from 3 to 6 Mb. This discrepancy may be explained by the difficulty in detecting the duplication and the variable, sometimes quite mild phenotype. This newly described 22q duplication syndrome is characterized by palatal defects, cognitive deficits, minor ear anomalies, and characteristic facial features. We report on a male with truncus arteriosus and an interrupted aortic arch, immunodeficiency, and hypocalcemia. The patient is mosaic for two abnormal cell lines: a deletion [del(22)(q11.2q11.2)] found in 11 cells and a duplication [dup(22)(q11.2q11.2)] found in 9 cells. Molecular cytogenetic analysis in our patient revealed a 1.5 Mb deletion/duplication, the first duplication reported of this size. Deletion/duplication mosaicism, which is rare, has been reported in a number of cases involving many different chromosome segments. We present the clinical phenotype of our patient in comparison to the phenotypes seen in patients with the 22q11.2 deletion or duplication alone. We propose that this rearrangement arose by a mitotic event involving unequal crossover in an early mitotic division facilitated by LCRs.     

Minute supernumerary marker chromosomes identified in two patients with a related, larger pseudodicentric chromosome.

We describe two cases in which a minute supernumerary marker chromosome (SMC) was identified in addition to a larger pseudodicentric chromosome. Case 1, a phenotypically normal male, had mosaicism for a psu dic(15;15)(q11.2;q11.2) chromosome and a minute SMC. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) showed that the minute SMC was D15Z1 positive, indicating a chromosome 15 origin. Case 2 was a 22-week fetus with mosaicism for a normal and two abnormal cell lines: one had a psu dic (22;22)(q11.2;q11.2) chromosome containing euchromatin, usually associated with cat eye syndrome; the other a minute SMC. The minute SMC was positive with the D14Z1/D22Z1 alpha-satellite probe, indicating a chromosome 14 or chromosome 22 origin. Deletion of centromeric material was proposed as one mechanism of centromere inactivation in dicentric chromosomes. The origin of these two minute SMC suggests that they were derived from one of the centromeres of the larger pseudodicentric chromosome. These stable minute SMC may be the by-product of a deletion event inactivating one centromere of a dicentric chromosome to generate a pseudodicentric chromosome. Alternatively, the minute SMC may originate from further rearrangement of the larger pseudodicentric chromosome. These cases suggest possible mechanisms for the origin of minute SMC.     

Supernumerary ring chromosomes in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans may contain sequences from 8q11.2-qter and 17q21-qter: a combined cytogenetic and comparative genomic hybridization study

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) presents with characteristic cytogenetic features such as reciprocal t(17;22)(q22;q13) or, more commonly, supernumerary ring chromosomes containing sequences from chromosomes 17 and 22. Here, we report the identification of a novel abnormality in a 43-year-old woman with DFSP. Cytogenetic analysis of tumor cells showed the presence of a supernumerary ring chromosome as the sole anomaly. Amplification of 8q11.2 approximately qter and 17q21 approximately qter sequences was confirmed by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH); the present case apparently lacked amplification of chromosome 22. To our knowledge, this is the first case indicating that the ring chromosome in DFSP is possibly associated with amplified material from chromosomes 8 and 17.     

Minute supernumerary marker chromosomes identified in two patients with a related,larger pseudodicentric chromosome*

We describe two cases in which a minute supernumerary marker chromosome (SMC) was identified in addition to a larger pseudodicentric chromosome. Case 1, a phenotypically normal male, had mosaicism for a psu dic(15;15)(q11.2;q11.2) chromosome and a minute SMC. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) showed that the minute SMC was D15Z1 positive, indicating a chromosome 15 origin. Case 2 was a 22‐week fetus with mosaicism for a normal and two abnormal cell lines: one had a psu dic (22;22)(q11.2;q11.2) chromosome containing euchromatin, usually associated with cat eye syndrome; the other a minute SMC. The minute SMC was positive with the D14Z1/D22Z1 α‐satellite probe, indicating a chromosome 14 or chromosome 22 origin. Deletion of centromeric material was proposed as one mechanism of centromere inactivation in dicentric chromosomes. The origin of these two minute SMC suggests that they were derived from one of the centromeres of the larger pseudodicentric chromosome. These stable minute SMC may be the by‐product of a deletion event inactivating one centromere of a dicentric chromosome to generate a pseudodicentric chromosome. Alternatively, the minute SMC may originate from further rearrangement of the larger pseudodicentric chromosome. These cases suggest possible mechanisms for the origin of minute SMC. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Evidence for deletion of 9q as a two-step process in chronic myeloid leukemia

Evidence for deletion of 9q as a two-step process in chronic myeloid leukemia.Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is characterized by the Philadelphia translocation t(9;22)(q34;q11) resulting in the BCR/ABL fusion gene. Submicroscopic deletion of the derivative chromosome 9 occurs in a subset of these patients and is associated with poor prognosis. In the current study, we present two unusual cases of CML selected from a series of 54 consecutive cases. A detailed study using classical cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis was done using dual color extra signal FISH and whole chromosome paint in order to elucidate the mechanism of 9q deletion. One case had two clones on interphase FISH, one with and one without chromosome 9q deletion. The other case had two clones on both cytogenetic and FISH analyses, one with and one without a marker chromosome carrying chromosome 9q sequences. In this latter case, the clone with deletion of the derivative chromosome 9 comprised 21.1% at diagnosis, increasing to 36.8% after 11 months, suggesting a growth advantage. We report here evidence that deletions on 9q in CML may occur through breakage and rearrangement of chromosomes resulting in derivative chromosomes and either a marker chromosome or fragment/episome, followed by loss of chromosome material from the cell.     

"Compensatory" uniparental disomy of chromosome 21 in two cases.

Two cases of growth failure, microcephaly, facial dysmorphism, muscular hypertonia, and severe psychomotor retardation are described. At birth, both cases had cytogenetic mosaicism in lymphocytes and skin fibroblasts, in case 1 ring chromosome 21 and monosomy 21 and in case 2, deletion of chromosome 21 and monosomy 21. At a later age the lymphocyte karyotype changed almost completely to 46,XX, but the fibroblast karyotype remained as before. DNA polymorphism analysis described elsewhere indicated that the 46,XX lymphocytes contained two identical chromosomes 21 (isodisomy), in case 1 inherited from the father and in case 2 from the mother. The isodisomy was the result of duplication of a chromosome in mitosis after the loss of the homologous abnormal chromosome ("compensatory isodisomy"). We report here that this cytogenetic mechanism can result in false normal cytogenetic findings. The phenotypes were attributed to the cells with monosomy 21 in case 1 and to the deletion and monosomy of chromosome 21 in case 2.     

Cytogenetic and molecular analysis of 6q deletions in burkitt's lymphoma cell lines

Although abnormalities of chromosome 6 have frequently been observed in Burkitt's lymphoma (BL), they have 50 far not been defined by modern cytogenetic and molecular methods. By a combination of high-resolution chromosome banding, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis, we have examined the nature of aberrations affecting chromosome 6 in 7 previously established BL cell lines. All cell lines exhibited the characteristic translocations associated with BL; 5 had t(814)(q24;q32) and 2 had t(8;22)(q24;q11). Three cell lines had deletions of 6q; 3 others had rearrangements affecting 6q, whereas one cell line had apparently normal chromosomes 6. FISH analysis of the three deletions established that they were interstitial. LOH analysis with probes mapped to the 6q26-27 region confirmed the sub-telomeric interstitial deletion in cell line BL-108, which had a del(6)(q23q27). All informative loci mapped to 6q26-27 (5/7) were deleted in BL-74, which had no apparent cytogenetic abnormality in chromosome 6, thus documenting a sub-microscopic deletion. These data define the cytogenetic and molecular limits of 6q deletions in BL and are consistent with our previous demonstration of LOH analysis of the site of a candidate tumor suppressor gene in the 6q25-27 region. Genes Chrom Cancer 9:13-18 (1994). ©1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Prenatal diagnosis of chromosome 4 mosaicism: prognostic role of cytogenetic, molecular, and ultrasound/MRI characterization

Trisomy 4 mosaicism is extremely rare: herein we report the cytogenetic and molecular characterization and prenatal US findings of a case diagnosed prenatally. The diagnosis of level III mosaicism was established in cultured amniotic fluid cells (22.5%). At 22 weeks gestation, micrognathia and hypotelorism were suspected at 2-D sonography, and confirmed at 3-D examination. In addition, 2-D US showed cerebellar hypoplasia associated with borderline ventriculomegaly (confirmed at magnetic resonance imaging, MRI), spine deformity (hemivertebra), and a complete atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD). The pregnancy was terminated. Trisomy 4 mosaicism was confirmed in placental and fetal skin cultured cells. The cord blood karyotype was normal. Molecular analysis excluded uniparental disomy of chromosome 4, and indicated that the trisomy 4 was of maternal meiotic origin. In presence of chromosome 4 mosaicism, accurate fetal sonography and echocardiography are mandatory. Low level mosaicism and normal echographic examinations seem to be associated with good prognosis. In postnatal life, chromosome 4 mosaicism should be suspected, and cytogenetic analysis proposed of further tissues (i.e., skin), in presence of craniofacial dysmorphism, cardiac defects, and abnormal hands/feet, even if mental development is appropriate or only slightly impaired.     

Spectral karyotyping reveals 17;22 fusions in a cytogenetically atypical dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with a large marker chromosome as a sole abnormality

The presence of an extra ring chromosome containing material from 17q and 22q, or, less frequently, a t(17;22)(q22;q13), is a cytogenetic hallmark of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP). However, occasionally tumors with other, atypical karyotypes are encountered. We describe a case of recurrent DFSP without a ring chromosome or a t(17;22) on standard cytogenetic analysis. In all cells analyzed by G-banding, an additional, large marker chromosome was present as a sole abnormality. This chromosome apparently included chromosome 8 or the 8q arm, but the origin of its remaining part could not be determined with certainty. To characterize further the abnormal chromosome, we applied spectral karyotyping (SKY). SKY confirmed the presence of an extra chromosome 8 or arm 8q in the marker and showed that its remaining part was composed of segments from chromosomes 7, 17, 21, and 22, with two copies of a 17;22 fusion. Our results and the literature data suggest that, in addition to a specific 17;22 fusion, amplification of material from chromosomes 17, 22, 8, 5, 7, and 21 may play a role in DFSP development and/or progression. Furthermore, our case demonstrates the usefulness of SKY in detection of a diagnostically relevant 17;22 fusion in DFSP patients who have unusual karyotypic features.     

Dynamic mosaicism involving an unstable supernumerary der(22) chromosome in cat eye syndrome

We have studied a girl, her sister and her mother who had a supernumerary marker chromosome in mosaicism. The marker was studied by cytogenetic methods and nonisotopic in situ hybridization with the single D22S9 DNA probe which maps to 22q11. The supernumerary chromosome was derived from a chromosome 22 and it did not present the same morphology in all the cells. At least 5 distinct types of the marker chromosome were detected and some of them were probably derived from each other (dynamic mosaicism). The proposita had an MCA pattern consistent with mild cat eye syndrome, while her sister and her mother had some of the manifestations described in this syndrome. A specific corelation could be established between phenotype and karyotype. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Molecular and cytogenetic characterisation of an unusual case of partial trisomy/partial monosomy 13 mosaicism: 46,XX,r(13)(p11q14)/46,XX,der(13)t(13;13)(q10;q14)

A female infant with multiple malformations and mental retardation was noted to have a rare de novo chromosome abnormality involving mosaicism with two cell lines, one with a ring chromosome 13, and the other with partial trisomy 13 owing to a complex rearrangement. Cytogenetic examination excluded the presence of a t(13q;13q) cell line and showed a cell line with a marker chromosome containing two chromosome 13 long arms joined together after deletion of a part (q11→q14) of one of them. In addition, the absence of a cell line with two normal chromosomes 13 or a cell line with a t(13q;13q) implies that the ring (13) and the marker (13) arose from a single event at the first cleavage division.
The two cell lines were present in different proportions in both peripheral blood lymphocytes and skin fibroblasts. The results of microsatellite characterisation clearly indicate the paternal origin and the absence of recombination, supporting the postzygotic origin of both the ring and the marker chromosome.


Keywords: unusual mosaicism; ring 13; partial trisomy 13; partial monosomy 13     

Characterization of chromosomal aberrations in human gastric carcinoma cell lines using chromosome painting

Using chromosome painting, a study of chromosomal abnormalities was performed in six gastric carcinoma cell lines (SNU-484, 601, 620, 638, 668, 719) from Korean patients. Each carcinoma cell line had unique modal karyotypic characteristics and showed a variable number of numerical and structural clonal cytogenetic aberrations. SNU-484, SNU-620, and SNU-668 had near-triploidy; SNU-601, SNU-638, and SNU-719 had near-diploidy. The origins of the marker chromosomes of these cell lines were identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization with constructed painting probes. In all of six cell lines, rearrangement of chromosome 17 resulting in partial deletion of 17p (and/or partial duplication of 17q) was found. The most frequent marker was a partial gain of chromosome 7 with the breakpoints on 7q22 and 7q31. The nonrandom rearrangements of chromosomes were also determined on 1q32, 5q11-q22, 8q, 14q22, 14q34, and 15q15; suggesting that they may be the candidate regions for the isolation of the genes related to gastric cancer.