A comparison of patient risk for pressure ulcer development with nursing use of preventive interventions.

OBJECTIVE: (1) Determine if the Braden scale or Norton scale predicted the same patients to be at risk for pressure ulcer development as were receiving preventive nursing interventions. (2) Identify the items on the Braden and Norton risk assessment scales that the nurses used intuitively to determine a patient's need for a preventive intervention. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Six hundred-bed, state-supported, long-term care facility. PATIENTS: War veterans who were 82% male and 97% caucasian, mean age 73. MEASUREMENTS: (1) Patients were categorized as at-risk or not-at-risk by the Norton and Braden scales. (2) The presence of a preventive nursing intervention was noted. Agreement in assignment of at-risk status among the two assessments and presence of a preventive intervention was analyzed using Cohen's Kappa. (3) The staff nurses' use of preventive interventions was modeled using stepwise logistic regression. The items from the Braden and Norton risk assessment scales were used as independent variables with staff nurse implementation of a preventive intervention as the dependent variable. RESULTS: Nurse preventive interventions were found on 45% of patients. The Norton scale identified 38% and the Braden scale identified 27% of patients as at-risk. Agreement among the three methods was 0.53. Agreement between the Braden and Norton scales was 0.73. Agreement between use of a preventive intervention and a classification as at-risk by the Braden or Norton scale was 0.41 and 0.43, respectively. Stepwise logistic regression revealed that low Braden mobility scores (Odds Ratio: 2.74) and low Braden friction/shear scores (Odds Ratio: 3.29) were associated with an increased likelihood of a patient receiving a preventive nursing intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The overall level of agreement among the two scales predicting risk and the presence of a preventive intervention was not high. Agreement, however, between the two risk assessment scales was close. The staff nurses apparently relied on a patients' mobility, their exposure to friction/shear, and additional unidentified factors to guide implementation of a preventive intervention. Further study is needed to define the cost, efficacy, and related cost effectiveness of routine pressure ulcer risk assessment.     

A prospective study of pressure sore risk among institutionalized elderly.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if dietary intake, nutritional status, and other physical markers are risk factors for the development of pressure sores in the elderly. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: 250-bed skilled nursing facility with 90 extended care beds in which the average length of stay is 28 days. PATIENTS: Two hundred newly admitted residents (70% female, 95% Caucasian) who were over age 65, estimated to stay greater than 10 days, at risk for pressure sore development (Braden Scale score less than or equal to 17) but free of existing pressure sores were studied for 12 weeks or until discharge. MEASURES: Skin assessment, Braden Scale score, blood pressure, body temperature, anthropometrics, and dietary intake were studied weekly. CBC, serum albumin, serum total protein, serum iron, iron binding capacity, serum zinc and copper, and serum vitamin C were studied weekly for 4 weeks and biweekly for 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence/absence and stage of pressure sores. MAIN RESULTS: Stage I pressure sores developed in 70 (35%) and Stage 2 or worse in 77 (38.5%) residents. Subjects who developed pressure sores were older (P less than 0.001) and had lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure (P less than 0.001) and higher body temperature (P less than 0.001) than those without pressure sores. Dietary intake of all nutrients was lower among subjects who developed pressure sores. Using logistic regression, the best predictors or pressure sore development were the Braden Scale score, diastolic blood pressure, temperature, dietary protein intake, and age. CONCLUSIONS: Risk assessment is recommended upon admission to a nursing home and weekly for the first month. Risk status can be effectively predicted by using the Braden Scale in combination with knowledge of age, blood pressure, temperature, and dietary protein intake.     

Implementing a pressure ulcer prevention program and enhancing the role of the CWOCN: impact on outcomes

Hospitals in the US are increasingly concerned with the rising number of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers. To reduce its 2002-2003 average hospital-acquired pressure ulcer prevalence rate of 9.2%, a regional medical center in southeastern US initiated a process improvement and education program. Quarterly pressure ulcer prevalence studies were conducted and the Medical Intensive Care Unit was found to have the highest number of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers among the five units participating in the study. As part of a new Pressure Ulcer Strategic Plan, significant changes were made to the organizational infrastructure and processes, which included implementing the Braden Risk Scale Assessment Tool in place of the Norton Risk Scale, developing a pressure ulcer prevention protocol, creating Pressure Ulcer/Skin Tear Physician orders for nurses, establishing a Skin Resource Team, and providing additional education, training, and other relevant resources. Better appreciation for and enhanced utilization of Certified Wound Ostomy Continence Nurses were encouraged. New support surfaces were purchased. Implementing these changes resulted in a decrease in the quarterly hospital-acquired pressure ulcer prevalence in participating units, including the Medical Intensive Care Unit where rates dropped from a high of 29% to near 0%. Clinicians now approach pressure ulcers as preventable rather than inevitable and view Certified Wound Ostomy Continence Nurses as resources and clinical experts for prevention and treatment. Overall quality of care and financial resource utilization also have substantially improved.     

Skin assessment and pressure ulcer care in hospital-based skilled nursing facilities

The Minimum Data Set, a comprehensive assessment tool for nursing home residents, is used for clinical decision-making, research, quality improvement, and Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement. Within the Minimum Data Set, pressure ulcers and skin condition are evaluated. Because information about pressure ulcer prevalence and care in hospital-based skilled nursing facilities is sparse, a study was conducted to: a) determine pressure ulcer prevalence upon admission to hospital-based skilled nursing facilities in the state of Missouri, and b) ascertain methods of assessment, treatment, and documentation of skin and pressure ulcer care in these facilities. Prevalence data were obtained from analysis of the Minimum Data Set data, and a survey was conducted to obtain skin care practices. The vast majority of residents (96%) were admitted from acute care facilities, and pressure ulcer prevalence on admission was 18.4% +/- 8.0%. Seventy-seven percent (77%) of the 88 surveys mailed were returned. The Braden or Norton Scale for risk assessment is reportedly used by 55% of facilities; whereas, 35% use a facility-developed tool. Commonly reported pressure ulcer prevention/treatment interventions used include: dietitian referral, use of barrier ointments, and a written repositioning schedule. Incontinence management and minimizing the head of bed elevation were infrequently used. Nearly one-half (47%) of facilities reported daily reassessment and documentation of wound status, suggesting less-than-optimal, time-consuming wound care practices. Despite the limitations inherent in survey designs and the use of databases such as the Minimum Data Set, the results of this study suggest that pressure ulcers are a common problem in acute care and hospital-based skilled nursing facilities and research-based risk assessment, prevention, and wound assessment strategies have not been widely implemented. The results of this study provide a basis for developing educational programs and a guide for future research.     

Braden scale for pressure ulcer risk predicts rehabilitation placement after pancreatic resection

BackgroundPatients undergoing pancreatic resection frequently require rehabilitation facilities after hospital discharge. We evaluated the predictive role of validated markers of frailty on rehabilitation facility placement to identify patients who may require this service.MethodsSingle-center retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent pancreatic resection from 2010 to 2015. 90-day morbidity and mortality were calculated. Postoperative validated markers of frailty (Activities of Daily Living scale, Braden scale [assesses pressure ulcer risk, lower scores = higher risk] and Morse fall scale) were evaluated via multivariate regression to identify predictors of discharge to rehabilitation facility.Results470 patients with complete data were included. Mean age was 62 and 49.2% were male. Postoperative median length of stay (LOS) was 8 (IQR 7–10). 92 (19.66%) patients were discharged to rehabilitation facilities and 138 (29.49%) patients were readmitted within 90 days. On multivariate analysis, age, sex, LOS > 8 days, inpatient Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) and initial Braden scale were predictive of rehabilitation placement.ConclusionA marker of frailty routinely collected daily by nursing staff, the Braden scale, is available to help surgeons predict the need for postoperative rehabilitation placement after pancreatic resection. Engaging discharge planning services for at-risk patients may help prevent delayed hospital discharge and should be further evaluated.     

The Braden Scale cannot be used alone for assessing pressure ulcer risk in surgical patients: a meta-analysis

The validity and reliability of the Braden Scale for pressure ulcer development has been established in a variety of patient care settings, but studies suggest the scale does not capture risk factors in surgical patients. The purpose of this metaanalysis was to assess the predictive validity of the Braden Scale for pressure ulcer development in surgical patients. A literature search using PubMed and Web of Science databases (through July 2011) was conducted to identify all clinical studies on predicting pressure ulcers in surgical patients using the Braden Scale. To be eligible for inclusion, studies had to include sensitivity (true positive rate, TPR) and specificity (true negative rate, TNR) results or include sufficient data to calculate these factors. Study quality was assessed using the 14-item Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) instrument, and two-by-two tables of predictive validity were constructed from each article. Meta-analysis for predictive validity was performed, including calculation of pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), construction of summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves, and overall diagnostic accuracy (Q*). Three studies (N = 609 patients) met the meta-analysis inclusion criteria. The pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity were 0.42 (95% CI: 0.38 to 0.47) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0. 83 to 0.85), respectively, yielding a combined DOR of 4.40 (95% CI: 2.98 to 6.50). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.6921 ± 0.0346, and the Q* was 0.6466 ± 0.0274. Significant heterogeneity was noted between the included studies with Q value 34.49 (P = 0.0321), and I2 for pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, and pooled DOR was 88.7%, 98.6%, and 39.1%, respectively. Although the observed heterogeneity between studies may have affected the results, the low values for overall diagnostic accuracy (Q*) and diagnostic capability (AUC) indicate the Braden Scale has low predictive validity for pressure ulcer risk in surgical patients. A new pressure ulcer risk assessment scale for surgical patients should be developed and tested.     

Pressure ulcer prevalence in long-term nursing home residents since the implementation of OBRA '87. Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate change in pressure ulcer prevalence in long-term nursing home residents since the implementation of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 (OBRA '87). DESIGN: Cross-sectional comparison of two time periods. SETTING: Ninety-two nursing homes scheduled for a quality-of-care survey randomly selected from 22 representative states. PARTICIPANTS: Four thousand six hundred seventy-nine residents who had resided in the facility for at least 100 days were evaluated: 2,336 during 1992-1994 and 2,343 during 1997-1998. MEASUREMENTS: Trained registered nurses collected data on pressure ulcer prevalence, stage, and risk factors from medical record review during on-site evaluations. Risk-adjusted differences were estimated using logistic regression. RESULTS: Unadjusted prevalence rates for all stages of pressure ulcers (8.52% vs 8.54%, P =.983) and those rated stage 2 or greater (5.31% vs 5.63%, P =.624) did not differ between the two time periods. After adjustment for urinary incontinence, immobility, poor nutrition, and history of previous pressure ulcers, the relative odds of having a pressure ulcer in 1992/4 versus 1997/8 was 1.06 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.84-1.34) for all stages and 1.21 (95% CI = 0.92-1.60) for stages 2 and greater. CONCLUSIONS: No change in pressure ulcer prevalence was demonstrated since implementation of OBRA '87 in this nationally derived sample of long-term nursing home residents.     

The symptom of pain with pressure ulcers: a review of the literature

Although wound pain often is described as an important clinical factor by both patients and providers, pain associated with pressure ulcers is poorly understood. To assess the state of knowledge of pain with pressure ulcers, a systematic, integrative review of the literature was conducted to determine: 1) how pain is measured, 2) pain prevalence/incidence, and 3) factors associated with pressure ulcer pain. Bibliographic databases including MEDLINE (1966-2005), HealthSTAR (1975-2005), CINAHL (1982-2005), and seven others were searched using the terms decubitus ulcers, pressure ulcer, pressure sore, bed sore, and pain and then culled to English-language, clinical publications. Of the 417 articles recovered, 26 met the study inclusion criteria, six specifically identified pain prevalence (ranging from 37% and 100%), and none documented the incidence of pain in patients with pressure ulcers. Measurement tools used to assess pain included the Visual Analogue Scale, the Verbal Rating Scale, the Wong-Baker Facial Recognition Scale, the McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form, the Numerical Rating Scale, and the Present Pain Intensity scale. Pressure ulcer pain was described as a burning sensation and reported as both constant and transient. Contrary to often-held clinical opinion, the studies reviewed suggest that pain increases with pressure ulcer stage. Although a number of intrinsic and extrinsic factors were studied (eg, age, ulcer stage, and bed surfaces), no conclusions could be drawn from the available research. Because pain is an issue for individuals with pressure ulcers and may present a different profile than other sources of pain, pain assessment should become an integral part of pressure ulcer care and documented to guide pressure ulcer management.     

Risk factors for pressure sores. A comparison of cross-sectional and cohort-derived data

The purpose of this study was to identify prospectively risk factors for pressure sores and to compare these results with a cross-sectional analysis in the same population. Medical records on all admissions to a chronic care hospital over a 13-month period were reviewed. Data on potential risk factors were abstracted from the initial history, physical examination, nursing assessment, and laboratory studies. Pressure sore status on admission and at three weeks was determined from a standardized from completed on all patients with a score. The cross-sectional analysis was performed by comparing patients with and without a pressure sore at the time of admission. The cohort analysis used patients initially without a pressure sore and monitored for a new sore at three weeks. Factors associated with pressure sores on univariate testing were entered into a stepwise logistic regression model. One hundred of the 301 admissions presented with a pressure sore. Factors significantly associated with the presence of a sore were altered level of consciousness (OR = 4.1), bed- or chair-bound (OR = 2.4), impaired nutritional intake (OR = 1.9), and hypoalbuminemia (OR = 1.8 for 10 mg/mL decrease). Of the 185 patients without a pressure sore, 20 (10.8%) developed a sore. Factors significantly associated with the development of a new pressure sore were a history of cerebrovascular accident (OR = 5.0), bed- or chair-bound (OR = 3.8), and impaired nutritional intake (OR = 2.8). Neither urinary nor fecal incontinence, nor the presence of hypoalbuminemia, was associated with sore development. We have prospectively identified risk factors for pressure sores.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Prevalence of pressure ulcers in a Brazilian hospital: results of a cross-sectional study

Technological advances in recent decades have extended survival time of critically ill hospitalized patients but their unstable physiological state and limited mobility increase their risk for pressure ulcers. On two different days (June 16 and October 20, 2004), pressure ulcer prevalence in patients hospitalized at the S?o Paulo Hospital, Brazil was assessed. On study day 1, 43 of the 376 inpatients (prevalence, 11.4%) and on study day 2, 35 of 340 inpatients (prevalence, 10.3%) had pressure ulcers. No significant differences in patient or ulcer characteristics between the two study days were observed. Ulcer prevalence was highest among patients in the intensive care unit (average 32.7%). Most patients had one ulcer (61.5%), classified as Stage II (47%), located in the sacral area (47%), and were considered at high risk according to their Braden Scale scores (60% had a score ≤ 11). The results obtained were not unexpected and confirmed the need to improve quality of care by establishing pressure ulcer prevention protocols. Additional studies to optimize prevention efforts and improve the existing evidence-base are necessary, especially in patient care units with high pressure ulcer rates.     

Partners in caregiving in a special care environment: cooperative communication between staff and families on dementia units

PURPOSE: This article reports the results of a randomized, controlled evaluation of Partners in Caregiving in a Special Care Environment, an intervention designed to improve communication and cooperation between staff and families of residents in nursing home dementia programs. DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants included 388 family members and 384 nursing staff members recruited from 20 nursing homes, randomly assigned to treatment and control conditions. Project staff conducted training sessions on communication and conflict-resolution techniques with two groups at the intervention sites: staff and residents' family members, followed by a joint meeting with facility administrators. RESULTS: Families, staff, residents, and facility programs in the intervention facilities all demonstrated positive outcomes from program participation. Families experienced significant improvement in communicating with staff and in staff behaviors toward them, and spouses of residents increased their care involvement. Staff reported reduced conflict with families and reduced depression; burnout for nurses increased for individuals in the control group but not those in the treatment group. Behavioral symptoms decreased for residents, and facilities implemented more family-focused programs. IMPLICATIONS: Effective staff and family partnerships are critical in caring for residents with dementia. The Partners in Caregiving in a Special Care Environment program is an evidence-based intervention that enables these partnerships to develop and thrive, translating into improved experiences for residents, families, and staff.     

The National Pressure Ulcer Long-Term Care Study: pressure ulcer development in long-term care residents

OBJECTIVES: To identify resident, treatment, and facility characteristics associated with pressure ulcer (PU) development in long-term care residents. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with convenience sampling. SETTING: Ninety-five long-term care facilities participating in the National Pressure Ulcer Long-Term Care Study throughout the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1,524 residents aged 18 and older, with length of stay of 14 days or longer, who did not have an existing PU but were at risk of developing a PU, as defined by a Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk score of 17 or less, on study entry. MEASUREMENTS: Data collected for each resident over a 12-week period included resident characteristics (e.g., demographics, medical history, severity of illness using the Comprehensive Severity Index, Braden Scale scores, nutritional factors), treatment characteristics (nutritional interventions, pressure management strategies, incontinence treatments, medications), staffing ratios and other facility characteristics, and outcome (PU development during study period). Data were obtained from medical records, Minimum Data Set, and other written records (e.g., physician orders, medication logs). RESULTS: Seventy-one percent of subjects (n=1,081) did not develop a PU during the 12-week study period; the remaining 29% of residents (n=443) developed a new PU. Resident, treatment, and facility characteristics associated with greater likelihood of developing a Stage I to IV PU included higher initial severity of illness, history of recent PU, significant weight loss, oral eating problems, use of catheters, and use of positioning devices. Characteristics associated with decreased likelihood of developing a Stage I to IV PU included new resident, nutritional intervention (e.g., use of oral medical nutritional supplements and tube feeding for >21 days), antidepressant use, use of disposable briefs for more than 14 days, registered nurse hours of 0.25 hours per resident per day or more, nurses' aide hours of 2 hours per resident per day or more, and licensed practical nurse turnover rate of less than 25%. When Stage I PUs were excluded from the analyses, the same variables were significant, with the addition of fluid orders associated with decreased likelihood of developing a PU. CONCLUSION: A broad range of factors, including nutritional interventions, fluid orders, medications, and staffing patterns, are associated with prevention of PUs in long-term care residents. Research-based PU prevention protocols need to be developed that include these factors and target interventions for reducing risk factors.     

A quality improvement program to enhance after-hours telephone communication between nurses and physicians in a long-term care facility

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether satisfaction of on-site nurses with after-hours telephone communication with off-site physicians improved in one long-term care (LTC) facility after a nurse-oriented intervention.
DESIGN: Longitudinal quality improvement study.
SETTING: Extended Care and Rehabilitation Center (ECRC), Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen registered nurses.
INTERVENTION: Communicating Health Assessments by Telephone (Project CHAT), a program of individualized training sessions and decision support tools to aid LTC nurses with symptom assessment and communication of health information over the telephone.
MEASUREMENTS: Nurses completed six satisfaction surveys (three surveys in the 3 months before Project CHAT and three surveys in the 3 months after Project CHAT).
RESULTS: The nurses' average satisfaction scores increased on several items, including those that assessed whether the nurse was pretty sure what pieces of information the physician was going to ask for ( P =.04), felt that the amount of patient information the physician asked for seemed reasonable ( P =.03), felt prepared to answer the questions the physician asked ( P =.01), and felt that the process of gathering patient information for the physician was easy ( P =.01). The percentage of calls that resulted in immediate evaluation by a physician (on-site or in the emergency department) increased from 2.0% in the period before Project CHAT to 8.6% in the period after Project CHAT ( P =.01).
CONCLUSION: Nurses' satisfaction with several aspects of after-hours telephone medicine improved after an inexpensive, education-based intervention in one LTC facility. Further research is needed to determine how similar interventions might affect other quality measures, including patient outcomes.     

Pressure ulcers among patients admitted to home care

CONTEXT: Pressure ulcers are an understudied problem in home care. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of pressure ulcers among patients admitted to home care services, describe the demographic and health characteristics associated with pressure ulcers in this setting, and identify the percentage of these patients at risk for developing pressure ulcers. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of patients on admission to home care agencies. SETTING: Forty-one home care agencies in 14 states. PATIENTS: A consecutive sample of 3,048 patients admitted March 1 through April 30, 1996 (86% of all admissions). Subjects had a mean age of 75 years; 63% were female and 85% white. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic, social, and clinical characteristics, functional status (Katz activities of daily living scale and Lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale), mental status (Katzman Short Memory-Orientation-Concentration test), pressure ulcer risk (Braden Scale), pressure ulcer status (Bates-Jensen Pressure Ulcer Status Tool), and a checklist of pressure-reducing devices and wound care products being used. RESULTS: In the total sample of 3,048 patients, 9.12% had pressure injuries: 37.4% had more than one ulcer and 14.0% had three or more ulcers. Considering the worst ulcer for each subject, 40.3% had Stage II and 27% had Stage III or IV injuries. Characteristics associated with pressure ulcers included recent institutional discharge, functional impairment, incontinence, and having had a previous ulcer. About 30% of subjects were at risk for new pressure ulcers. Pressure-relieving devices and other wound care strategies appeared to be underutilized and often indiscriminately applied. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial need for pressure ulcer prevention and treatment in home care settings.     

Nursing home quality and pressure ulcer prevention and management practices

OBJECTIVES: To measure pressure ulcer quality indicator (QI) scores and to describe the self-reported skin integrity assessment, pressure ulcer risk assessment, and pressure ulcer prevention and treatment practices in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a large data set and comparative survey. SETTING: LTCFs in Missouri. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred sixty-two LTCFs participated in the survey. Three hundred twenty-one facilities had pressure ulcer QI scores between April 1 and September 30, 1999. MEASUREMENTS: Pressure ulcer QI scores, Pressure Ulcer Prevention & Treatment Practices Survey. RESULTS: The mean+/-standard deviation pressure ulcer QI score was 10.9+/-6.2%, with a risk-adjusted score of 15.7+/-8.9% for high-risk residents and 3.1+/-3.6% for low-risk residents. Minimizing head-of-bed elevation to less than 30 degrees was used by fewer than 20% of facilities. More than 40% of facilities used a risk assessment tool that was not evidence based. Fewer than 13% of facilities used the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research pressure ulcer prevention and treatment guidelines. No relationship was found between the number of prevention strategies (P=.892) or the number of treatment strategies (P=.921) and the pressure ulcer QI scores. CONCLUSION: Valid and reliable pressure ulcer risk assessment tools are seriously underused. Evidence-based pressure ulcer prevention and treatment guidelines appear to be rarely implemented. This study provides a basis for developing educational and quality improvement programs and future research related to pressure ulcer prevention and treatment in LTCFs.     

A three year multiphase pressure ulcer prevalence/incidence study in a regional referral hospital

Pressure ulcers can have a devastating impact on health and care provision, ranging from patient discomfort and increased healthcare costs to a potential reflection on the quality of care. To evaluate the outcomes of prevention education and skin integrity interventions on the incidence of pressure ulcers, a multiphase project was initiated in an urban 154-bed regional referral community hospital in Ontario, Canada that provides care to an urban and rural population. The prevalence study included 84 adult subjects at baseline, 77 after one year (Phase 1), and 100 after 3 years (Phase 2). The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk and a data collection form were used to record prevalence, incidence, stage and location of pressure ulcers, and related documented interventions. Incidence data were obtained from patient charts and defined as ulcers that developed over 24 hours following admission. Phase 1 interventions involved staff education and replacement of existing skin care products. Phase 2 interventions included adoption of pressure ulcer prevention protocols, advanced wound care products, improved support surface usage, modification of documentation methods, and staff education. Of the 84 patients assessed at baseline , 15 (17.9 %) developed 22 pressure ulcers compared to 4 of 77 (5.2%) during Phase 1 and 2 out of 100 (2.0%) during Phase 2. The difference between baseline and both subsequent time points was statistically significant (P greater than 0.05). These results suggest that education and the implementation of appropriate skin care products and procedures and pressure ulcer prevention protocols may reduce the incidence of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers.