Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis revealed four genomic prognostic biomarkers for primary gastric cancers

Unlike the case with some other solid tumors, whole genome array screening has not revealed prognostic genetic aberrations in primary gastric cancer. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) using bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) arrays for 56 primary gastric cancers resulted in identification of four prognostic loci in this study: 6q21 (harboring FOXO3A; previously FKHRL1), 9q32 (UGCG), 17q21.1∼q21.2 (CASC3), and 17q21.32 (HOXB3 through HOXB9). If any one of these four loci was deleted, the prognosis of the patient was significantly worse (P = 0.0019). This was true even for advanced tumors (stage IIIA, IIB, or IV, n = 39) (P = 0.0113), whereas only 1 of the 17 patients with less advanced tumors (stage IA, IB, or II; n = 17) died of disease after surgery. Multivariate analysis according to the status of four BACs or pathological stage based on the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (stages IA, IB, and II vs. stages IIIA, IIIB, and IV) demonstrated that the BAC clone status was also an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.006). These findings may help predict which patients with malignant potential need more intensive therapy, or may point to new therapeutic approaches especially for advanced tumors. The parameter here termed the integrated genomic prognostic biomarker may therefore be of clinical utility as a prognostic biomarker.     

Gains, losses, and amplifications of genomic materials in primary gastric cancers analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization

By means of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), we screened 58 primary gastric cancers for changes in copy number of DNA sequences. We detected frequent losses on Ip32-33 (21%), 3p21-23 (22%), 5q14-22 (36%), 6q16 (26%), 9p21-24 (22%), 16q (21%), 17p13 (48%), 18q11-21(33%), and 19(40%). Gains were most often noted at I p36 (22%), 8p22-23 (24%), 8q23-24 (29%), 11q12-13 (24%), 16p(21%), 20p (38%), 20q (45%), Xp21-22(38%), and Xq21-23 (43%), with high-level amplifications at 6p21(2%),7q31(10%), 8p22-23(5%), 8q23-24 (7%), 11q13(4%), 12p12-13(4%), 17q21(2%), 19q12-13(2%), and 20q13(2%). High-level amplification at 8p22-23 has never been reported in any other cancer type and its frequency was as high as that reported for the MYC, MET, and KRAS genes. We narrowed down the smallest common amplicon to 8p23.1 by reverse-painting FISH to prophase chromosomes. Southern blot analysis using one EST marker (D38736) clearly demonstrated that amplification of this exon-like sequence had occurred in all three tumors in which amplifications at 8p22-23 had been detected by CGH. Our data provide evidence for several, previously undescribed, genomic aberrations that are characteristic of gastric cancers.     

Genetic alterations in primary gastric carcinomas correlated with clinicopathological variables by array comparative genomic hybridization

Genetic alterations have been recognized as an important event in the carcinogenesis of gastric cancer (GC). We conducted high resolution bacterial artificial chromosome array-comparative genomic hybridization, to elucidate in more detail the genomic alterations, and to establish a pattern of DNA copy number changes with distinct clinical variables in GC. Our results showed some correlations between novel amplified or deleted regions and clinical status. Copy-number gains were frequently detected at 1p, 5p, 7q, 8q, 11p, 16p, 20p and 20q, and losses at 1p, 2q, 4q, 5q, 7q, 9p, 14q, and 18q. Losses at 4q23, 9p23, 14q31.1, or 18q21.1 as well as a gain at 20q12 were correlated with tumor-node-metastasis tumor stage. Losses at 9p23 or 14q31.1 were associated with lymph node status. Metastasis was determined to be related to losses at 4q23 or 4q28.2, as well as losses at 4q15.2, 4q21.21, 4q 28.2, or 14q31.1, with differentiation. One of the notable aspects of this study was that the losses at 4q or 14q could be employed in the evaluation of the metastatic status of GC. Our results should provide a potential resource for the molecular cytogenetic events in GC, and should also provide clues in the hunt for genes associated with GC.     

Genetic heterogeneity by comparative genomic hybridization in BRCAx breast cancers

The chromosomal changes in eight familial BRCAx breast cancers (i.e., negative for BRCA1 or BRCA2) were analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to investigate intratumor heterogeneity. This was the first step in a study of most frequent chromosomal aberrations in BRCAx familial breast cancers. Laser microdissection analysis of paraffin tissue samples was followed by whole-genome amplification. CGH was performed on DNA isolated from two to three different cell groups per case to detect any cytogenetic aberrations in important clones that might have been missed when analyzing DNA extracted from large numbers of cells. The results were compared, to evaluate the influence of tumor heterogeneity on CGH, and the heterogeneity was confirmed comparing CGH with fluorescence in situ hybridization results. Different chromosomal aberrations were detected between adjacent clones within the same section, which highlights the utility of microdissection in addressing the problem of heterogeneity in whole-genome studies. Some chromosomal regions were more frequently altered in the eight BRCAx tumors; loss of 2q, 3p, 3q, 8p, 9p, and 15q and gains of 1p, 4p, 4q, 5p, 6q, 12q, and 19p were the most common. Further studies focusing on specific genes and sequences with more sensitive approaches, such as array-CGH, are warranted to confirm these findings.     

Genomic profiling of myeloid sarcoma by array comparative genomic hybridization

Myeloid sarcoma (MS) is a tumor mass of myeloblasts or immature myeloid cells occurring in an extramedullary site. In this study, seven cases of MS [stomach (1), testis (1), skin (2), and lymph node (3)] and 3 synchronous and 1 follow-up bone marrow (BM) samples were studied for genomic abnormalities using array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH). Array-CGH construction used approximately 5,400 bacterial artificial chromosome clones from the RPCI-11 library, spanning the human genome. Data were analyzed using the DNAcopy software and custom heuristics. All MS cases had genomic abnormalities detected by array-CGH. Unbalanced genomic abnormalities in five MS cases were confirmed by conventional cytogenetics (CC) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); these abnormalities included loss of 4q32.1-q35.2, 6q16.1-q21, and 12p12.2-p13.2 and gain of 8q21.2-q24.3, 8, 11q21-q25, 13q21.32-q34, 19, and 21. Array-CGH was also invaluable in identifying possible deletions, partner translocations, and breakpoints that were questionable by CC. The remaining two MS cases had genomic aberrations detected by array-CGH, but were not studied further by CC/FISH. Chromosome 8 was most commonly abnormal (3/7 cases). Identical genomic abnormalities were demonstrated in MS and in synchronous BM in two cases. These results demonstrate that array-CGH is a powerful tool to screen MS tissue for unbalanced genomic abnormalities, allowing identification of chromosome abnormalities when concurrent BM is nonanalyzable or nonleukemic.     

Fluorescent in situ hybridization and array comparative genomic hybridization: complementary techniques for genomic evaluation

During the past few years a new high-throughput molecular technology, array comparative genomic hybridization, has received a great deal of attention. As a DNA-based tool, this technique is presumably more reproducible than expression arrays. In this review, I discuss how array comparative genomic hybridization is remarkably similar with regard to genome analysis to fluorescent in situ hybridization, a technique that is generally regarded as one of the more accurate and reproducible molecular techniques in diagnostic surgical pathology. A thorough understanding of this technology will be useful for all surgical pathologists in the near future, as this technology will no doubt have some influence on our daily practice.     

PGD for a complex chromosomal rearrangement by array comparative genomic hybridization

Patients carrying a chromosomal rearrangement (CR) have an increased risk for chromosomally unbalanced conceptions. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) may avoid the transfer of embryos carrying unbalanced rearrangements, therefore increasing the chance of pregnancy. Only 7-12 loci can be screened by fluorescence in situ hybridization whereas microarray technology can detect genome-wide imbalances at the single cell level. We performed PGD for a CR carrier with karyotype 46,XY,ins(3;2)(p23;q23q14.2),t(6;14)(p12.2;q13) using array comparative genomic hybridization. Selection of embryos for transfer was only based on copy number status of the chromosomes involved in both rearrangements. In two ICSI-PGD cycles, nine and seven embryos were analysed by array, leaving three and one embryo(s) suitable for transfer, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of single cell arrays was 100 and 88.8%, respectively. In both cycles a single embryo was transferred, resulting in pregnancy following the second cycle. The embryo giving rise to the pregnancy was normal/balanced for the insertion and translocation but carried a trisomy 8 and nullisomy 9 in one of the two biopsied blastomeres. After 7 weeks of pregnancy the couple miscarried. Genetic analysis following hystero-embryoscopy showed a diploid (90%)/tetraploid (10%) mosaic chorion, while the gestational sac was empty. No chromosome 8 aneuploidy was detected in the chorion, while 8% of the cells carried a monosomy for chromosome 9. In summary, we demonstrate the feasibility and determine the accuracy of single cell array technology to test against transmission of the unbalanced meiotic products that can derive from CRs. Our findings also demonstrate that the genomic constitution of extra-embryonic tissue cannot necessarily be predicted from the copy number status of a single blastomere.     

Efficient high-resolution deletion discovery in Caenorhabditis elegans by array comparative genomic hybridization

We have developed array Comparative Genomic Hybridization for Caenorhabditis elegans as a means of screening for novel induced deletions in this organism. We designed three microarrays consisting of overlapping 50-mer probes to annotated exons and micro-RNAs, the first with probes to chromosomes X and II, the second with probes to chromosome II alone, and a third to the entire genome. These arrays were used to reliably detect both a large (50 kb) multigene deletion and a small (1 kb) single-gene deletion in homozygous and heterozygous samples. In one case, a deletion breakpoint was resolved to fewer than 50 bp. In an experiment designed to identify new mutations we used the X:II and II arrays to detect deletions associated with lethal mutants on chromosome II. One is an 8-kb deletion targeting the ast-1 gene on chromosome II and another is a 141-bp deletion in the gene C06A8.1. Others span large sections of the chromosome, up to >750 kb. As a further application of array Comparative Genomic Hybridization in C. elegans we used the whole-genome array to detect the extensive natural gene content variation (almost 2%) between the N2 Bristol strain and the strain CB4856, a strain isolated in Hawaii and JU258, a strain isolated in Madeira.     

Chromosomal alterations in ulcerative colitis-related and sporadic colorectal cancers by comparative genomic hybridization

Both ulcerative colitis (UC)-related and sporadic colorectal cancers are thought to evolve through a multistep process of genomic instability, accumulation of genomic alterations, and clonal expansion. This process may involve different genomic changes in UC-related cancers than in sporadic cancers because of the origin of UC-related cancers in an inflammatory field. This study was designed to define the specific genomic events occurring in UC-related cancers. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was performed on 32 UC-related and 42 stage-matched sporadic colorectal cancers. The mean number of chromosomal alterations per case was similar in the UC-related and sporadic tumor groups (8.6 in UC, 8.1 in sporadic). The 2 tumor groups shared many chromosomal alterations: losses on 18q (78% UC v69% sporadic), 8p (53% v50%), 17p (44% v57%), and gains on 8q (63% v45%), 20q (44% UC v67%), and 13q (44% UC v38%). However, differences in the frequency and timing of specific alterations were observed. Chromosome 5q was lost in 56% of UC-related but in only 26% of sporadic cancers. Alterations of chromosome 8 were associated with stage progression in UC-related, but not in sporadic cancers. In contrast, 18q loss was associated with stage progression in sporadic cancers only. Thus, differences in the frequency and timing of individual chromosomal alterations suggest that genetic progression in these 2 tumor groups may follow multiple pathways.     

Detection of low-level mosaicism and placental mosaicism by oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization

PurposeTo determine the sensitivity of whole-genome oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization for the detection of mosaic cytogenetic abnormalities.MethodsMosaicism sensitivity was evaluated by testing artificially derived whole chromosome and segmental aneuploidies ranging from 0% to 100% abnormal and additional naturally occurring mosaic specimens.ResultsUsing combined dye-reversed replicates and an unfiltered analysis, oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization detected as low as 10% and 20–30% mosaicism from whole chromosome and segmental aneuploidies, respectively. To investigate discrepancies between cultured and uncultured specimens, array comparative genomic hybridization was performed on DNA from additional direct product of conception specimens with abnormal karyotypes in culture. Interestingly, 5 of 10 product of conception specimens with double trisomies on cultured cell analysis had only a single trisomy by array comparative genomic hybridization and quantitative polymerase chain reaction on DNA from the uncultured direct specimen, and all harbored the more commonly observed trisomy. Thus, oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization revealed previously unidentified placental mosaicism in half of the products of conception with double-aneuploid conventional karyotypes.ConclusionOligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization can detect low-level mosaicism for whole chromosome (∼10%) and segmental (∼20–30%) aneuploidies when using specific detection criteria. In addition, careful interpretation is required when performing array comparative genomic hybridization on DNA isolated from direct specimens as the results may differ from the cultured chromosome analysis.     

Construction and application of a zebrafish array comparative genomic hybridization platform

The zebrafish is emerging as a prominent model system for studying the genetics of human development and disease. Genetic alterations that underlie each mutant model can exist in the form of single base changes, balanced chromosomal rearrangements, or genetic imbalances. To detect genetic imbalances in an unbiased genome-wide fashion, array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) can be used. We have developed a 5-Mb resolution array CGH platform specifically for the zebrafish. This platform contains 286 bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones, enriched for orthologous sequences of human oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Each BAC clone has been end-sequenced and cytogenetically assigned to a specific location within the zebrafish genome, allowing for ease of integration of array CGH data with the current version of the genome assembly. This platform has been applied to three zebrafish cancer models. Significant genomic imbalances were detected in each model, identifying different regions that may potentially play a role in tumorigenesis. Hence, this platform should be a useful resource for genetic dissection of additional zebrafish developmental and disease models as well as a benchmark for future array CGH platform development.     

Identification of cryptic microaberrations in osteosarcoma by high-definition oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization

Osteosarcoma (OS) is an aggressive bone tumor characterized by complex abnormal karyotypes and a high level of genomic instability. Using high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), a novel class of localized copy number variations called microaberrations has been detected. These genomic anomalies typically involve DNA imbalances affecting 700 kb to 1 Mb DNA, and are often associated with some type of genetic syndromes. Because the origin of instability in OS is poorly understood, we used aCGH to determine whether microaberrations were a characteristic of four OS cell lines: U-2 OS, HOS, MG-63, and SAOS-2. TP53 is mutated in SAOS-2, a line in which 17 microaberrations were found. In contrast, U-2 OS, which has a wild-type TP53, had only six such anomalies, the lowest incidence. A 500-kb microaberration within a region of gain at 5p15.33 in SAOS-2 was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Significantly, this genomic location is close to the TERT gene, a region of gain in all four cell lines. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic analysis of the incidence of microaberrations in OS. The high levels of these anomalies detected suggest that the instability processes in OS that lead to a highly abnormal karyotypes may also be associated with acquisition of genomic microaberrations.     

Detection of DNA copy number alterations in cancer by array comparative genomic hybridization

Over the past few years, various reliable platforms for high-resolution detection of DNA copy number changes have become widely available. Together with optimized protocols for labeling and hybridization and algorithms for data analysis and representation, this has lead to a rapid increase in the application of this technology in the study of copy number variation in the human genome in normal cells and copy number imbalances in genetic diseases, including cancer. In this review, we briefly discuss specific technical issues relevant for array comparative genomic hybridization analysis in cancer tissues. We specifically focus on recent successes of array comparative genomic hybridization technology in the progress of our understanding of oncogenesis in a variety of cancer types. A third section highlights the potential of sensitive genome-wide detection of patterns of DNA imbalances or molecular portraits for class discovery and therapeutic stratification.     

High-resolution genomic profiles of breast cancer cell lines assessed by tiling BAC array comparative genomic hybridization

A BAC-array platform for comparative genomic hybridization was constructed from a library of 32,433 clones providing complete genome coverage, and evaluated by screening for DNA copy number changes in 10 breast cancer cell lines (BT474, MCF7, HCC1937, SK-BR-3, L56Br-C1, ZR-75-1, JIMT1, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-361, and HCC2218) and one cell line derived from fibrocystic disease of the breast (MCF10A). These were also characterized by gene expression analysis and found to represent all five recently described breast cancer subtypes using the "intrinsic gene set" and centroid correlation. Three cell lines, HCC1937 and L56BrC1 derived from BRCA1 mutation carriers and MDA-MB-231, were of basal-like subtype and characterized by a high frequency of low-level gains and losses of typical pattern, including limited deletions on 5q. Four estrogen receptor positive cell lines were of luminal A subtype and characterized by a different pattern of aberrations and high-level amplifications, including ERBB2 and other 17q amplicons in BT474 and MDA-MB-361. SK-BR-3 cells, characterized by a complex genome including ERBB2 amplification, massive high-level amplifications on 8q and a homozygous deletion of CDH1 at 16q22, had an expression signature closest to luminal B subtype. The effects of gene amplifications were verified by gene expression analysis to distinguish targeted genes from silent amplicon passengers. JIMT1, derived from an ERBB2 amplified trastuzumab resistant tumor, was of the ERBB2 subtype. Homozygous deletions included other known targets such as PTEN (HCC1937) and CDKN2A (MDA-MB-231, MCF10A), but also new candidate suppressor genes such as FUSSEL18 (HCC1937) and WDR11 (L56Br-C1) as well as regions without known genes. The tiling BAC-arrays constitute a powerful tool for high-resolution genomic profiling suitable for cancer research and clinical diagnostics.     

Large-scale variation among human and great ape genomes determined by array comparative genomic hybridization

Large-scale genomic rearrangements are a major force of evolutionary change and the ascertainment of such events between the human and great ape genomes is fundamental to a complete understanding of the genetic history and evolution of our species. Here, we present the results of an evolutionary analysis utilizing array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH), measuring copy-number gains and losses among these species. Using an array of 2460 human bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) (12% of the genome), we identified a total of 63 sites of putative DNA copy-number variation between humans and the great apes (chimpanzee, bonobo, gorilla, and orangutan). Detailed molecular characterization of a subset of these sites confirmed rearrangements ranging from 40 to at least 175 kb in size. Surprisingly, the majority of variant sites differentiating great ape and human genomes were found within interstitial euchromatin. These data suggest that such large-scale events are not restricted solely to subtelomeric or pericentromeric regions, but also occur within genic regions. In addition, 5/9 of the verified variant sites localized to areas of intrachromosomal segmental duplication within the human genome. On the basis of the frequency of duplication in humans, this represents a 14-fold positional bias. In contrast to previous cytogenetic and comparative mapping studies, these results indicate extensive local repatterning of hominoid chromosomes in euchromatic regions through a duplication-driven mechanism of genome evolution.     

Molecular characterization by array comparative genomic hybridization and DNA sequencing of 194 desmoid tumors

Desmoid tumors are fibroblastic/myofibroblastic proliferations. Previous studies reported that CTNNB1 mutations were detected in 84% and that mutations of the APC gene were found in several cases of sporadic desmoid tumors lacking CTNNB1 mutations. Forty tumors were analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Karyotype and fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed a nonrandom occurrence of trisomy 8 associated with an increased risk of recurrence. We report the first molecular characterization including a large series of patients. We performed array CGH on frozen samples of 194 tumors, and we screened for APC mutations in patients without CNNTB1 mutation. A high frequency of genomically normal tumors was observed. Four relevant and recurrent alterations (loss of 6q, loss of 5q, gain of 20q, and gain of Chromosome 8) were found in 40 out of 46 tumors with chromosomal changes. Gain of Chromosomes 8 and 20 was not associated with an increased risk of recurrence. Cases with loss of 5q had a minimal common region in 5q22.5 including the APC locus. Alterations of APC, including loss of the entire locus, and CTNNB1 mutation could explain the tumorigenesis in 89% of sporadic desmoids tumors and desmoids tumors occurring in the context of Gardner's syndrome. A better understanding of the pathogenetic pathways in the initiation and progression of desmoid tumors requires studies of 8q and 20q gains, as well as of 6q and 5q losses, and study of the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

No gene copy number changes in Dupuytren's contracture by array comparative genomic hybridization

Dupuytren's contracture (DC), a benign disease of unknown origin, is characterized by abnormal fibroblast proliferation and matrix deposition within the palmar and plantar faciae, causing contracture of the digits. Conventional cytogenetic studies of cultured fibroblast cells from DC nodules have revealed nonrecurrent, but usually normal, clonal (mainly +7, +8, and –Y, plus structural changes) and sporadic (nonclonal) numerical/structural rearrangements. No unique cytogenetic features of DC are known so far. We used 44K oligonucleotide-based array comparative genomic hybridization to obtain a wide pattern of chromosomal imbalances in 18 patients with DC. The genome-wide analysis revealed no changes of DNA copy number sequences. Accordingly, gene amplifications or deletions are apparently not involved in the progression of abnormal fibroblast proliferation and matrix deposition that lead to DC.     

Chromosomal imbalances detected by array comparative genomic hybridization in human oligodendrogliomas and mixed oligoastrocytomas

Loss of heterozygosity and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies have shown that deletions of 1p and 19q are highly prevalent in oligodendroglioma. However, these tumors have not been comprehensively screened for other alterations in chromosomal dosage. In this study, we used array-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGHa) of mapped BAC DNA to screen for such alterations in 31 oligodendrogliomas (20 grade II, 9 grade III, and 2 grade IV) and 4 mixed oligoastrocytomas (1 grade I, 1 grade II, and 2 grade IV). The most frequent aberrations were loss of 1p (17 cases; 49%) and 19q (15 cases; 43%) and combined loss of 1p/19q (13 cases; 37%). In addition, deletion of 4q, 5p, 9p, 10q, 11p, and 13q was observed in 10, 4, 8, 4, 4, and 13 cases, respectively; loss of whole chromosomes 4, 9, and 13 in 4, 1, and 7 cases, respectively; gain of 7p, 8q, 10p, and 11q in 6, 6, 5, and 10 cases, respectively, and gain of whole chromosomes 7 and 11 in 2 patients each. Minimally altered regions detected by CGHa involved chromosome bands 1p36.32, 4q33, 5p15, 8q24, 11p15, and 19q13.3. Univariate analysis of all 35 cases suggested that combined deletion of 1p and 19q is associated with better survival (P = 0.03). In addition, 8q gain in the oligodendrogliomas was strongly associated with poor outcome (P = 0.002). Also associated with poor disease outcome were alterations that had low prevalence in the pure oligodendrogliomas, including loss of 3q, 9q, and 12q and gain of 1p, 8p, and 10q. In summary, in oligodendrogliomas, CGHa was able to detect novel small alterations in chromosomal dosage that had not been previously detected by other methods. In addition, our findings support the hypotheses that oligodendroglioma can be classified into several groups by CGHa analysis and that specific alterations in genetic dosage may have biologic or clinical significance.