Vinorelbine and capecitabine in anthracycline- and/or taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: sequential or combinational?

Purpose

The difference between combinational and pre-planned sequential therapies using regimens that include non-anthracycline and taxane in the first-line setting remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to explore the interaction between vinorelbine (N) and capecitabine (X) in breast cancer cells and to compare the simultaneous or sequential administration of the two drugs in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) as first-line treatment.

Methods

First, we explored the effects of vinorelbine on thymidine phosphorylase (TP) and thymidylate synthase (TS) expression in breast cancer cells. Next, we designed a prospective randomized phase II trial of MBC patients comparing the combinational and pre-planned sequential administration of vinorelbine and capecitabine in the first-line metastatic setting. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The correlation between clinical characteristics and class III β-tubulin expression and patient survival was also explored.

Results

Vinorelbine upregulates TP and downregulates TS in breast cancer cells, thereby further sensitizing tumor cells to capecitabine, which indicated the proper order for sequential therapy should be N → X. Sixty patients were eligible for the phase II trial. No significant difference was observed between the combinational arm and the sequential arm in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS). Only in the subgroup of patients with liver metastases were median PFS and OS significantly prolonged in the combinational arm (8.5 vs. 6.4 months, P = 0.041 and 23.8 vs. 13.9 months, P = 0.028, respectively). No association between class III β-tubulin expression and patient outcome was identified. Grade 3/4 adverse events were more common in the combinational arm.

Conclusions

Both the NX regimen and pre-planned sequential N → X regimen are acceptable as first-line treatments with comparable efficacies for MBC patients previously treated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes. Sequential monotherapies are recommended as the preferred approach to first-line chemotherapy for most MBC patients in the absence of an imminent visceral crisis and the need for rapid symptom and/or disease control.     

The Breast Avastin Trial: phase II study of bevacizumab maintenance therapy after induction chemotherapy with docetaxel and capecitabine for the first-line treatment of patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer

Background

Therapeutic approach for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is still controversial. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for MBC. The feasibility of bevacizumab maintenance therapy in this setting was also evaluated.

Patients and methods

In this single-arm, multicenter phase II study, patients received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel 60 mg/m² on day 1, plus capecitabine 900 mg/m² twice daily on days 1–14 every 21 days. Treatment was administered for up to 6 cycles, then bevacizumab continued until progressive disease. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points were tumor response rate, overall survival, and toxicity.

Results

Seventy-nine eligible patients were treated with bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel plus capecitabine. The overall response rate was 61 %, with a complete response rate of 8 % and a median duration of response of 10 months. At a median follow-up of 28 months, the median PFS was 11 months. Fifty-two (65 %) patients received bevacizumab maintenance therapy for a median duration of 7 months (range 1 to 33+). Neutropenia was the most common grade 3–4 toxicity (28.1 % of patients), and two fatal adverse events occurred (septic shock and gastrointestinal perforation).

Conclusions

Bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel and capecitabine demonstrates significant activity and quite acceptable toxicity profile as first-line treatment of MBC. Subsequent maintenance therapy with bevacizumab is feasible for a long period of stable disease. Results deserve confirmation.     

Phase II study of oral vinorelbine in combination with capecitabine as second line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes

Purpose

Effective treatment options for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) resistant/refractory to anthracyclines and/or taxanes are limited. Intravenous and oral combination of vinorelbine (VRL) and capecitabine were shown to be feasible and effective in first-line MBC. In order to evaluate the activity of the combination of an all oral regimen in a more advanced setting, we investigated a regimen combining oral VRL and capecitabine in a phase II study as second-line chemotherapy of MBC patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes.

Patients and methods

Forty patients (median age 52 years) with MBC received the combination of oral VRL 60 mg/m² on days 1, 8 and 15 plus capecitabine 1,000 mg/m² bid given from day 1 to day 14 in an open-label, international, multicentre, phase II study. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR) evaluated by an independent panel review. Secondary objectives included safety, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival and quality of life.

Results

All the patients had received prior chemotherapy with anthracyclines and taxanes, 75% were refractory/resistant to anthracycline and/or taxane, 72.5% presented with visceral involvement and the last prior chemotherapy for 87.5% of the patients was for advanced disease setting. The median number of administered cycles per patient was 4 (range 1–31). Eight responses were documented and validated by an independent panel review, yielding RRs of 20% [95% CI: 9–35.6] in the intent-to-treat (treated) population and 23.5% [95% CI: 10.7–41.2] in the 34 evaluable patients. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 3.4 months [95% CI: 2.3–5.5] and 11.3 months [95% CI: 8.1–16.4], respectively. The principal toxicities were anaemia, neutropenia (rarely complicated; only one patient experienced febrile neutropenia), fatigue and gastrointestinal toxicities with very few grade 3–4 non-haematological toxicities.

Conclusions

In second-line treatment of MBC patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes, oral VRL plus capecitabine is a safe regimen with an efficacy comparable to the other available combination regimens used in this heavily and resistant/refractory (75% of patients) pre-treated patients’ population. Moreover, this well-tolerated combination offers the advantages of an all oral regimen.     

A phase II,randomized, multicenter study evaluating the combination of lapatinib and vinorelbine in women with ErbB2 overexpressing metastatic breast cancer

Lapatinib is approved in combination with capecitabine for treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who have progressed on prior trastuzumab in the metastatic setting. Vinorelbine is an important chemotherapy option for MBC. We evaluated efficacy and safety of lapatinib plus vinorelbine, compared with lapatinib plus capecitabine, in women with HER2-positive MBC. In this open-label, multicenter, phase II study, eligible patients (N = 112) were randomized 2:1 to lapatinib plus vinorelbine [(N = 75) 1,250 mg orally once daily (QD) continuously plus 20 mg/m²/day intravenously] or lapatinib plus capecitabine [(N = 37) 1,250 mg orally QD continuously plus 2,000 mg/m²/day orally, 2 doses]. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Other endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. Patients progressing within the study were given the option of crossover to the other treatment arm; time to second progression was an exploratory endpoint. Patient demographics, stratification, and prognostic factors were well balanced between treatments. Median PFS in both arms was 6.2 months [95 % confidence interval (CI) 4.2, 8.8 (lapatinib plus vinorelbine); 4.4, 8.3 (lapatinib plus capecitabine)]. Median OS on lapatinib plus vinorelbine was 24.3 months (95 % CI 16.4, NE) and 19.4 months (95 % CI 16.4, 27.2) on lapatinib plus capecitabine. In total, 42 patients opted to cross over; median PFS was 3.2 months (95 % CI 1.7, 5.1) on lapatinib plus vinorelbine and 4.0 months (95 % CI 2.1, 5.8) on lapatinib plus capecitabine. Lapatinib plus vinorelbine offers an effective treatment option for patients with HER2-overexpressing MBC, having displayed comparable efficacy and tolerability rates to lapatinib plus capecitabine.     

Sequential administration of dose-dense epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel/capecitabine for patients with HER2-negative and locally advanced or node-positive breast cancer

Purpose

Capecitabine is effective against metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We hypothesized that sequential treatment with dose-dense epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) and docetaxel/capecitabine would be active and tolerable in the adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting.

Methods

In this prospective phase II clinical trial patients with HER2-negative and node-positive or locally advanced tumors were eligible to receive four cycles of EC (100/600 mg/m²) every 2 weeks with G-CSF on days 3–10, followed by four cycles of docetaxel/capecitabine (75/1,000 mg/m² b.i.d., days 1–14) every 3 weeks.

Results

Fifty-five patients were enrolled with median age of 49, and 80% had hormone receptor-positive disease. The median tumor size was 2.5 cm, with a median of two axillary nodes involved. Seventy-five percent of the first 20 patients had grade 2/3 hand-foot syndrome (HFS). Dose reduction of capecitabine to 800 mg/m² reduced the grade 2/3 HFS incidence to 31% in the remaining patients. No grade 4/5 toxicities were observed. All 20 patients treated preoperatively responded, with 5 (25%) pathologic complete responses and 3 additional pT₀N₁ tumors. At a median follow-up of 48 (range 28–60) months, the event-free and overall survival rates are 91 and 98%, respectively.

Conclusions

Sequential treatment with dose-dense EC followed by docetaxel/capecitabine, using a lower capecitabine dose than that approved for MBC, has an acceptable toxicity profile and encouraging activity when used as neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.     

The BIG 2.04 MRC/EORTC SUPREMO Trial: pathology quality assurance of a large phase 3 randomised international clinical trial of postmastectomy radiotherapy in intermediate-risk breast cancer

Purpose

The PELICAN trial evaluates for the first time efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) versus capecitabine as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Methods

This randomized, phase III, open-label, multicenter trial enrolled first-line MBC patients who were ineligible for endocrine or trastuzumab therapy. Cumulative adjuvant anthracyclines of 360 mg/m² doxorubicin or equivalent were allowed. Left ventricular ejection fraction of >50 % was required. Patients received PLD 50 mg/m² every 28 days or capecitabine 1250 mg/m² twice daily for 14 days every 21 days. The primary endpoint was time-to-disease progression (TTP).

Results

210 patients were randomized (n = 105, PLD and n = 105, capecitabine). Adjuvant anthracyclines were given to 37 % (PLD) and 36 % (capecitabine) of patients. No significant difference was observed in TTP [HR = 1.21 (95 % confidence interval, 0.838–1.750)]. Median TTP was 6.0 months for both PLD and capecitabine. Comparing patients with or without prior anthracyclines, no significant difference in TTP was observed in the PLD arm (log-rank P = 0.64). For PLD versus capecitabine, respectively, overall survival (median, 23.3 months vs. 26.8 months) and time-to-treatment failure (median, 4.6 months vs. 3.7 months) were not statistically significantly different. Compared to PLD, patients on capecitabine experienced more serious adverse events (P = 0.015) and more cardiac events among patients who had prior anthracycline exposure (18 vs. 8 %; P = 0.31).

Conclusion

Both PLD and capecitabine are effective first-line agents for MBC.

     

Clinical outcomes in patients who received lapatinib plus capecitabine combination therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer with brain metastasis and a comparison of survival with those who received trastuzumab-based therapy: a study by the Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology

Purpose

In this study, we investigated the effect of lapatinib plus capecitabine treatment in HER2-positive breast cancer patients with brain metastasis.

Methods

Of 405 metastatic breast cancer patients with brain metastases at referral centers in Turkey, 46 were treated with lapatinib plus capecitabine only after the development of brain metastasis. Patients who only received trastuzumab-based therapy after the development of brain metastases were accepted as the historic control group for survival analyses (n = 65). Patients who received both drugs consecutively or sequentially were excluded from the analyses (n = 34).

Results

Median age among 46 patients who received lapatinib plus capecitabine therapy was 45 years (27–76), and median time for development of brain metastases was 11.9 months (0–69 months). Twenty-six out of 38 patients who received lapatinib plus capecitabine and had extracranial metastasis showed partial response or stable diseases (68.4 %). Grade 3-4 toxicity was observed in eight patients (17.3 %). Median overall survival (OS) in patients treated with lapatinib plus capecitabine was significantly increased compared to that in patients treated with trastuzumab-based therapy (19.1 vs. 12 months, respectively, p = 0.039). The incidence of cerebral death was slightly decreased in patients who received lapatinib plus capecitabine compared to those who received trastuzumab-based therapy (32 vs. 43.4 %, p = 0.332). In the multivariate analysis, lapatinib plus capecitabine therapy remained an independent positive predictor for survival [odds ratio (OR), 0.57; p = 0.02].

Discussion

Although this retrospective multicenter study had several limitations, the results suggest that undergoing lapatinib plus capecitabine therapy after the diagnosis of brain metastasis may further improve survival compared to undergoing only trastuzumab-based therapy.     

Serum epidermal growth factor is associated with prognosis and hormone receptor status in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer treated with first-line trastuzumab plus taxane chemotherapy

Purpose

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) is a ligand for the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) shares common signal pathways and forms a heterodimer with EGFR. In this study, we investigated the clinical and pathologic implications of serum EGF levels in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Methods

We analyzed serum EGF levels from baseline serum samples of consecutive patients with HER2-positive MBC who received first-line trastuzumab plus taxane chemotherapy and correlated them with treatment outcomes and pathologic features.

Results

A total of 50 women were analyzed. The median age was 47 years (range 27–72 years). Patients with high serum EGF levels (≥10.0 pg/mL) had significantly longer overall survival (47.0 months (95 % confidence interval (CI) 28.3–65.7 months) vs. 23.3 months (95 % CI 13.5–33.1 months); p = 0.009) with a tendency toward longer progression-free survival (p = 0.123). Serum EGF levels were not associated with hematologic or cardiac adverse events. Progesterone receptor-positive patients had significantly higher serum EGF levels than progesterone receptor-negative patients (24.3 pg/mL (range 9.5–69.0 pg/mL) vs. 12.3 pg/mL (range 0.0–59.5 pg/mL); p = 0.006).

Conclusions

Our data suggest that high serum EGF levels may be associated with good prognosis in patients with HER2-positive MBC receiving trastuzumab plus taxane chemotherapy. In addition, serum EGF levels were associated with progesterone receptor positivity.     

Recent developments in the palliative treatment of breast cancer: ASCO 2013

Purpose

Highly selected abstracts from the ASCO meeting are reported.

Results and conclusions

Abstract #1040: Subgroup analysis of TURANDOT (first-line paclitaxel and bevacizumab (T + BEV) versus capecitabine and BEV) was presented; 130 patients had triple-negative disease. One-year overall survival of T + BEV-treated patients with triple-negative disease was 78 %. Thus, T + BEV may represent a preferred regimen. Abstract #514: Evidence for drug penetration of capecitabine and lapatinib was demonstrated in resected brain metastases from breast cancer. Patients scheduled for brain surgery received pre-operative therapy. Drug concentrations were detected in all lesions. Thus, capecitabine and lapatinib may penetrate the blood-brain barrier. Abstract #505: In BOLERO-3, everolimus (EVE) or placebo plus trastuzumab/vinorelbine were administered to trastuzumab-resistant, HER2-positive breast cancer after previous taxanes. In the EVE versus placebo group, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.0 versus 5.7 months, respectively. Thus, a positive effect of EVE was found. Abstract #555: Prognostic factors in HER2-negative breast cancer patients receiving first-line bevacizumab (BEV) plus non-anthracycline therapy were investigated. Negative factors were disease-free interval £ 24 months, liver metastases or ³ 2 involved organs, triple-negativity and adjuvant taxanes/anthracyclines, respectively. Thus, established prognostic factors were also confirmed in BEV-treated patients. Abstract #1049: Subgroup analyses of the phase-III trial of eribulin versus capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer pre-treated with anthracyclines/taxanes was carried out. Overall survival was predicted by non-visceral disease, > 2 organs involved, and PFS of < 6 months after last chemotherapy. Eribulin was superior in patients with > 2 metastatic sites, HER2-negative, ER-negative, and triple-negative disease, respectively. The latter patients may preferentially benefit from eribulin therapy.     

HER2/CEP17 ratio and HER2 immunohistochemistry predict clinical outcome after first-line trastuzumab plus taxane chemotherapy in patients with HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization-positive metastatic breast cancer

Purpose

This study aimed to elucidate the clinical implication of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/centromeric probe for chromosome 17 (HER2/CEP17) ratio and HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) results in patients with HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who received first-line trastuzumab plus taxane chemotherapy.

Methods

Using clinical data of patients with HER2 FISH-positive MBC who received first-line trastuzumab plus taxane chemotherapy, we analyzed the clinical outcome according to the HER2/CEP17 ratio and HER2 IHC analysis.

Results

Fifty-two women were analyzed. The median age was 50 years (range 27–69 years). Patients with a HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥3.0 had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) (17.2 vs. 7.4 months; p = 0.002) with a tendency toward higher response rate (RR) (p = 0.325) and longer overall survival (OS) (p = 0.129). Patients with HER2 IHC 1+ had significantly shorter OS (14.0 vs. 42.4 months; p = 0.013) along with a tendency toward lower RR (p = 0.068) and shorter PFS (p = 0.220). In the multivariate analysis, HER2/CEP17 ratio <3.0 (p = 0.004) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS 2 (p = 0.015) were significant factors for shorter PFS, and HER2 IHC 1+ (p = 0.015) and ECOG PS 2 (p = 0.036) were significant factors for poor OS.

Conclusions

Our data support that HER2/CEP17 ratios and HER2 IHC scores may predict clinical outcome after first-line trastuzumab plus taxane chemotherapy in patients with HER2 FISH-positive MBC.     

The yield of full <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA1</Emphasis>/<Emphasis Type="Italic">2</Emphasis> genotyping in Israeli high-risk breast/ovarian cancer patients who do not carry the predominant mutations

Purpose

Patients treated with trastuzumab for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (HER2+MBC) are living longer, but there is little information on their outcomes and treatment experience beyond the median survival from clinical trials and real-world observational studies. We aim to describe the real-world treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) for women surviving five or more years from initiation of trastuzumab for HER2+MBC.

Methods

This is a retrospective, whole-of-population cohort study of women initiating trastuzumab for HER2+MBC between 2001 and 2011, followed to 2016. We defined long-term survivors (LTS) as those patients surviving?≥?5 years from trastuzumab initiation. We used dispensing claims to describe timing of cancer treatments used by LTS and to estimate time on and off HER2-targeted therapies, and OS from trastuzumab initiation for HER2+MBC.

Results

Of 4177 women initiating trastuzumab for HER2+MBC, 1082 (26%) survived ≥?5 years. Median age for LTS was 54 years (IQR 46–63). At a median follow-up of 9.4 years, 36% of LTS died; their conditional probability of surviving an additional 5 years was 55%. Median time on trastuzumab and all HER2-targeted therapy was 58.9 months (27.6–88.1) and 69.1 months (35.6–124.5), respectively. 85% of LTS had a period off HER2 therapy, lasting a median of 30.4 months (8.2–NR).

Conclusions

LTS generally receive HER2-targeted therapies for periods of time longer than in clinical trials, but most LTS also had breaks in treatment. More research is needed to understand the effects of long-term treatment and to identify patients who may be able to safely discontinue HER2-targeted therapy.

     

A phase II study of capecitabine plus docetaxel in gemcitabine-pretreated metastatic pancreatic cancer patients: CapTere

Purpose

Docetaxel and capecitabine combination is synergistic in preclinical models. We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of this combination as second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPC), pretreated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.

Methods

Eligible patients were treated with capecitabine 800 mg/m² orally PO bid on days 1–14 in combination with intravenous docetaxel 30 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. The primary end point was overall response rate. Using a three-stage sequential design, two interim analyses for early stopping due to lack of efficacy were planned and conducted after 13 and 26 patients were accrued. Secondary end points included time to treatment failure, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and 50 % drop in CA19-9 levels.

Results

Forty-three patients were evaluable for toxicity and 42 evaluable for response, at a median age of 64 years. The majority of patients (74 %) had ECOG PS 0-1. Six patients (14 %) achieved a partial tumor response, and stable disease for ≥2 cycles was observed in 59 % of patients (n = 25). Thirty-five percent (n = 11/31) of patients had a ≥50 % decrease in CA19-9 levels. The median PFS was 3.7 months (95 % CI 2.1–4.3 months), and the median OS was 5.3 months (95 % CI 4.3–8.6 months). Treatment was generally well tolerated. Grade 3 toxicity and grade 4 toxicity were seen in 45 and 5 % of patients, respectively. One patient had a potential treatment-related mortality.

Conclusions

The combination of capecitabine and docetaxel is active and well tolerated in mPC patients pretreated with gemcitabine-based therapy.     

Phase II study of single agent oral vinorelbine as first-line treatment in patients with HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer

Purpose

Previous studies indicated that oral chemotherapy is convenient and preferred by many patients. We hereby report the efficacy and safety of oral vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Methods

Thirty-one patients with HER-2 negative MBC were enrolled between January 2007 and December 2010 in a prospective phase II trial. Patients were treated every 3 weeks with oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m² Days 1 and 8 for the 1st cycle and thereafter 80 mg/m² Days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Treatment was administered until disease progression or unexpected adverse event or patient refusal to continue. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints were time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and safety. Follow-up results until October 2012 are reported.

Results

Median age was 42 years (range 33–75). 26 (84 %) patients had 2 or more metastatic sites. A median of 6 cycles were administered (range 2–20). ORR was achieved in 9 (29 %) patients including 1 complete and 8 partial responses. 12 (39 %) patients had stable disease, resulting in a disease control rate of 68 %. Median TTP was 5.2 months [95 % CI 2.8–7.5]. Median OS was 16 months [95 % CI 11.3–20.7]. 3 (10 %) patients developed Grade 3–4 neutropenia. No events of febrile neutropenia, cardiac, renal toxicities or alopecia were recorded. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia and nausea-vomiting were reported in 2 (6 %) and 5 (16 %) patients, respectively.

Conclusion

Results show a good efficacy and tolerance profile of oral vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy for HER-2 negative MBC patients.     

Metronomic oral combination chemotherapy with capecitabine and cyclophosphamide: a phase II study in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer

Purpose

Metronomic combination chemotherapy with the oral fluoropyrimidine doxifluridine/5??-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5 -DFUR) and oral cyclophosphamide (C) showed promising efficacy in a single-arm study. The oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine was designed to deliver 5-fluorouracil preferentially to tumors, potentially improving efficacy over doxifluridine. We conducted a phase II multicenter study to evaluate an all-oral XC combination in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Materials and methods

Patients received capecitabine 828?mg/m² twice daily with cyclophosphamide 33?mg/m² twice daily, days 1?C14 every 3?weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results

Between May 2007 and April 2009, 51 patients were enrolled and 45 were included in the efficacy analysis. The median follow-up was 18.1?months. ORR was 44.4% and stable disease (??24?weeks) was achieved in 13.4%, resulting in a 57.8% clinical benefit response rate. Median PFS was 12.3?months (95% confidence interval: 8.9?C18.9?months). Median PFS was 10.7?months in triple-negative disease and 13.2?months in estrogen-receptor positive, HER2-negative disease. The 1- and 2-year OS rates were 86 and 71%, respectively. Median OS has not been reached. Grade 3 adverse events comprised leukopenia (26%), neutropenia (16%), and decreased hemoglobin (2%). There was no grade 3 hand-foot syndrome.

Conclusions

Oral XC is an effective first- or second-line therapy for MBC, demonstrating high activity in both luminal A and triple-negative disease with few severe side effects. This metronomic oral combination chemotherapy could be beneficial for the treatment of HER2-negative MBC.     

Possible use of combination chemotherapy with mitomycin C and methotrexate for metastatic breast cancer pretreated with anthracycline and taxanes

Background

Most patients with breast cancer need anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimens in the adjuvant setting, and an increasing number of them receive taxanes either in this setting or as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, no standard chemotherapy has been fully established for MBC patients pretreated with anthracycline and taxanes.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 48 patients with MBC who had been treated with chemotherapy combining mitomycin C and methotrexate (MMC/MTX), following treatment with anthracycline and taxanes. MMC was given at a dose of 8 mg/m² on day 1, and MTX of 60 mg/m² on day 1 and day 15. The cycle was repeated every 4 weeks.

Results

There were 11 partial responses (24%). The median time to progression was 4.8 months. The response rate of liver metastasis was 31%. Thrombocytopenia (grade 3) was observed in five patients (10%). Other toxicity was mild and manageable.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that MMC/MTX could be an effective subsequent treatment for patients whose MBC has been pretreated with anthracycline and taxanes.     

A multicenter phase II trial of docetaxel and capecitabine as salvage treatment in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel plus capecitabine (DC) combination as salvage treatment in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Patients and treatment

Patients with MBC who had disease progression after initial chemotherapy with anthracyclines (n?=?29; 100?%) and taxanes (n?=?11; 37.9?%) were treated with oral capecitabine 950?mg/m² twice daily on days 1?C14 and docetaxel 75?mg/m² on day 1 every 3?weeks. Nineteen (65.5?%) patients received this regimen as second line and 10 (34.5?%) as???3rd line of therapy. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity.

Results

Complete response occurred in two (6.9?%) patients and partial response in eleven (37.9?%) for an overall response rate of 44.8?% (95?% CI 26.7?C62.9?%). Eleven women (37.9?%) had stable disease and five (17.2?%) progressive disease. Of the eleven patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes, five (45.5?%) responded to DC combination. The median duration of response was 5.7?months (range 3.4?C64.2), the median time to disease progression 9.3?months (range 1.2?C58), and the median overall survival 25.5?months. No toxic death occurred. Neutropenia grade 4 occurred in 58.6?% of patients and three of them (10.3?%) developed neutropenic fever. Non-hematological toxicities were manageable with grade 3 hand-foot syndrome occurring in 6.9?% of the patients, fatigue in 3.4?%, and neurotoxicity in 3.4?%.

Conclusion

The DC combination is a valuable regimen as salvage treatment in anthracycline- or anthracycline and taxane-pretreated patients with MBC.     

Prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer by HER2 status and trastuzumab treatment

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and trastuzumab treatment on the prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 364 AGC patients who received systemic chemotherapy. To evaluate the impact of trastuzumab exposure during any type of chemotherapy, our analysis used time-varying covariates to avoid a possible lead-time bias.

Results

Among the 364 patients, 58 (15.9 %) were HER2-positive. The median overall survival of the HER2-positive patients treated with trastuzumab (n = 43) was significantly longer than that of the HER2-negative patients [n = 306; 24.7 vs. 13.9 months, with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.58; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.36–0.95; P = 0.03]. Notably, 22 patients continued with trastuzumab beyond the date of progression. By contrast, the HER2-positive patients not treated with trastuzumab (n = 15) showed survival similar to that of the HER2-negative patients (13.5 vs. 13.9 months, with an adjusted HR of 1.04; 95 % CI, 0.52–2.11; P = 0.91). According to the multivariate analysis, exposure to trastuzumab was independently associated with a better prognosis (HR 0.56; 95 % CI; 0.33–0.93; P = 0.026).

Conclusions

Recent HER2-positive AGC patients have a better prognosis than HER2-negative patients, particularly when treated with trastuzumab.     

Patterns of relapse and metastatic spread in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer according to estrogen receptor status

Purpose

The primary aim of this study was to compare the relapse patterns of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative patients with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. A secondary aim was to distinguish the preferential primary site of metastases in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer.

Methods

Out of 886 patients treated for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) between January 1995 and December 2006, 269 patients with HER2-positive tumors were identified. Of these, 198 patients with relapsed breast cancer following surgery were included in this study. Rates and patterns of relapse and metastatic spread in HER2+/ER+ and HER2+/ER? patients were analyzed. This analysis was evaluated by the validation patients’ cohort of our institute prospectively.

Results

Median relapse-free survival was longer in the HER2+/ER+ group than in the HER2+/ER? group (32.0 vs. 19.5 months, p = 0.0012). The peak of recurrence occurred at 12 months after surgery in the HER2+/ER? patients. The peak of relapse was later and the level was lower in the HER2+/ER+ patients (66 and 78 months following surgery) than in the HER2+/ER? patients (33 and 39 months following surgery, respectively). This result was reproduced by the validation cohort with great similarity. Young age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.59, p = 0.002], TNM stage 3 (HR 1.51, p = 0.005), and ER-negativity (HR 1.68, p < 0.0001) were identified as independent risk factors for relapse. Severe bone metastasis (HR 4.48, p = 0.028) and massive hepatic metastasis (HR 5.24, p = 0.043) were identified as independent risk factors for early relapse.

Conclusions

Our study shows that HER2-overexpressing breast cancer displays characteristic patterns of relapse and metastatic spread depending on ER status.     

A phase II study of lapatinib for brain metastases in patients with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer following trastuzumab based systemic therapy and cranial radiotherapy: subset analysis of Japanese patients

Background

It is known that one third of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated with trastuzumab will develop brain metastases. As the development of brain metastases is fatal, controlling its progression is clinically meaningful. However, effective therapy for MBC patients with brain metastasis after cranial radiation is limited. The international clinical study in which six Japanese patients participated indicated the antitumor activity of lapatinib against brain metastases of HER2-overexpressing breast cancer.

Methods

The efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of lapatinib 750 mg given twice daily to Japanese HER2-overexpressing MBC patients with brain metastases were assessed as part of the international clinical study.

Results

Of six Japanese patients treated in this study, two patients had shown volumetric reduction >20 % in their central nervous system (CNS), one of whom had >50 % reduction. Three patients, including two of these patients, had shown >20 % volumetric reduction in non-CNS lesions. Frequently reported adverse events were diarrhea and rash, all of which were controllable. The AUC_0–12 of lapatinib on day 28 was 1.74 times higher than that on day 1.

Conclusion

These results suggest that lapatinib monotherapy 750 mg given twice daily can exert some efficacy and has potential as a clinically meaningful treatment option for Japanese HER2-overexpressing breast cancer patients with brain metastases after cranial radiation.     

Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine combined with nedaplatin for recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients after failure of cisplatin-based chemotherapy

Purpose

There is no standard second-line regimen for recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients after failure of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. A multicenter phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of capecitabine combined with nedaplatin for these patients.

Patients and methods

In the multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase II study, patients with recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma who failed to previous cisplatin-based chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients received oral capecitabine (1,000 mg/m² twice daily from day 1 to 14) and intravenous nedaplatin (80 mg/m², day 1) every 3 weeks for two cycles at least.

Results

A total of forty-eight patients were enrolled and included in the intention-to-treat analysis of efficacy and adverse events. Treatment was well tolerated. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (8.4 %), anemia (2.1 %), diarrhea (4.2 %), stomatitis (6.3 %), and hand-foot syndrome (HFS) (4.2 %). There were two complete response (4.2 %), eighteen partial responses (37.5 %), giving an overall response rate of 41.7 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 27.7–55.8]. With a median follow-up period of 12.1 months, the median time to progression was 5.8 months (95 % CI 3.9–7.8 months) and median overall survival was 12.4 months (95 % CI 9.6–16.8 months).

Conclusion

Capecitabine combined with nedaplatin offers a satisfactory clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile for recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients after failure of cisplatin-based chemotherapy.