自体松质骨支持引导组织再生膜重建牙槽嵴的初步临床研究

目的:观察自体松质骨结合引导组织再生膜技术重建牙槽嵴的临床效果。方法:小切口微创取自体髂骨松质骨粒移植于牙槽嵴表面,上方覆盖聚四氟乙烯引导膜,为6例患者修复萎缩或缺损的牙槽嵴,分别在术前,术后1周,12周进行临床检查、测量重建高度或宽度,作X线检查,并对1例患者12周时的再生骨行组织学检查,观察临床重建效果。结果:牙槽嵴形态以及骨量较手术前得到明显改善,12周时6例牙槽嵴平均增宽,增高4.20 mm,X线检查表明术后植骨区骨组织量增多、骨密度较术前更致密;术后12周植骨部位组织学表现为排列不规则的板层新生骨,可见大量的成骨细胞突起。结论:自体松质骨移植与膜引导组织骨再生技术联合增高牙槽嵴取得满意疗效,值得推广应用。     

The effects of bone grafting material and a collagen membrane in the ridge splitting technique: an experimental study in dogs

Objectives: This study was designed to evaluate the effect of bone graft materials and collagen membranes in ridge splitting procedures with immediate implant placement using a dog model. Materials and methods: Mandibular premolars were extracted in five beagle dogs. After 3 months, ridge splitting and placement of three OsseoSpeed^? implants were performed bilaterally. The gaps between the implants were allocated according to the following eight treatment modalities; Group 1(no graft), Group 2 (autogenous bone), Group 3 (Bio‐Oss^® Collagen), Group 4 (Bio‐Oss^®), Group 5 (no graft+BioGide^®), Group 6 (autogenous bone+BioGide^®), Group 7 (Bio‐Oss^® Collagen+BioGide^®), and Group 8 (Bio‐Oss^®+BioGide^®). The dogs were sacrificed after 8 or 12 weeks and the specimens were analyzed histologically and histometrically. Results: The gaps between the implants were filled with the newly formed bone, irrespective of which of the eight grafting techniques was used. Group 1 revealed a significantly lower percentage of bone‐to‐implant contact (BIC) than Group 5 at 8 and 12 weeks (P<0.05). Group 1 showed the most prominent marginal bone loss (MBL) at 12 weeks (P<0.05). Regarding the use of membranes, Groups 1 and 2 showed significantly more MBL than Groups 5 and 6 at 12 weeks (P<0.05). Conclusions: After ridge splitting, if the gaps between implants were grafted or covered with collagen membranes, a higher percentage of BIC was obtained. Based on our results, we suggest that the use of bone graft materials and/or collagen membranes is better for the prevention of MBL after ridge splitting procedures. To cite this article:
Han J‐Y, Shin S‐I, Herr Y, Kwon Y‐H, Chung J‐H. The effects of bone grafting material and a collagen membrane in the ridge splitting technique: an experimental study in dogs.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. xx , 2011; 000–000
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02127.x     

拔牙位点保存的研究现状

牙齿缺失后,由于生理性的改建或缺乏生理性的刺激,牙槽骨逐渐萎缩和吸收、牙槽骨高度和宽度降低,最终造成骨量不足,为后期种植和义齿修复增加了难度和风险。虽然研究证实剩余牙槽嵴的吸收是不可避免的,但如何最大限度减少骨组织的吸收仍是目前研究的热点。位点保存(site preservation/ridge preservation/socket preservation)指凡是能够达到阻断或减少吸收及龈乳头萎缩的方法,目前有术式改良、自体移植或人工材料应用等各种尝试,但效果优劣尚无定论。本文就目前最常用的拔牙位点保存方法作一综述。     

Ridge preservation with the use of Bio-Oss® collagen: A 6-month study in the dog

Background: In previous short-term studies, it was observed that while the placement of biomaterial in alveolar sockets may promote bone formation and ridge preservation, the graft may in fact also delay healing.
Aim: The objective of the present experiment was to evaluate the more long-term effect on hard tissue formation and the amount of ridge augmentation that can occur by the placement of a xenogeneic graft in extraction sockets of dogs.
Material and methods: Five beagle dogs were used. The third mandibular premolars were hemi-sected. The distal roots were carefully removed. A graft consisting of Bio-Oss^® collagen was placed in one socket while the contra-lateral site was left without grafting. After 6 months of healing, the dogs were euthanized and biopsies were sampled. From each experimental site, four ground sections – two from the mesial root and two from the healed socket – were prepared, stained and examined under a microscope.
Results: The placement of Bio-Oss^® collagen in the fresh extraction socket served as a scaffold for tissue modeling but did not enhance new bone formation. In comparison with the non-grafted sites, the dimension of the alveolar process as well as the profile of the ridge was better preserved in Bio-Oss^®-grafted sites.
Conclusion: The placement of a biomaterial in an extraction socket may modify modeling and counteract marginal ridge contraction that occurs following tooth removal.     

Hard tissue alterations after socket preservation: an experimental study in the beagle dog

Objectives: The aim of the following experimental study was to assess bone changes in the horizontal and vertical dimension when using different socket preservation procedures. Material and methods: In five beagle dogs the distal roots of the 3rd and 4th premolar were extracted without elevation of a mucoperiosteal flap and the following treatments were assigned: Tx 1: The extraction socket was filled with BioOss Collagen^® (Geistlich Biomaterials, Wolhusen, Switzerland) and interrupted sutures were applied.: Tx 2: The extraction socket was filled with BioOss Collagen^® (Geistlich Biomaterials, Wolhusen, Switzerland) and a free gingival graft was sutured to cover the socket.: Tx 3: The extraction socket was left with its blood clot and interrupted sututes were applied.: Four month after surgery the dogs were sacrificed and from each extraction site two histological sections were selected for histometric analysis. The following parameters were evaluated: (1) the vertical dimension was determined by placing a horizontal line on the lingual bone wall. Then, the distance from this line to the buccal bone wall was measured. (2) The horizontal dimension was assessed at three different areas measured from the top of the lingual crest: 1 mm (Value 1), 3 mm (Value 3) and 5 mm (Value 5). Results: The mean vertical loss of the buccal bone plate for the Tx 1 group was 2.8±0.2 mm. The Tx 2 group showed vertical loss of 3.3±0.2 mm. The Tx 3 group demonstrated 3.2±0.2 mm of mean vertical loss. The horizontal dimension of the alveolar process was 4.4±0.3/6.1±0.2/7.2±0.1 mm at the three different levels for the Tx 1 group. The Tx 2 group depicted bone dimensions of 4.8±0.2/6.0±0.2/7.1±0.1 mm. The horizontal dimension of the Tx 3 group was 3.7±0.3/6.2±0.2/7.0±0.1 mm. When the results from the horizontal measurements were tested with the analysis of variance (anova ), a clear significance could be found in particular for Value 1 mm between the test groups Tx 1 and Tx 2 and the control group (Tx 3) (P<0.001). Furthermore the mean of treatment 1 (Tx 1) was slightly significantly lower than of treatment 2 (Tx 2) (P<0.05). Conclusion: The findings from the present study disclose that incorporation of BioOss Collagen^® into the extraction socket has only limited impact on the subsequent biologic process with particular respect to the buccal bone plate. The horizontal measurement of the alveolar ridge depicted that the loss of the buccal bone plate was replaced to a certain amount by newly generated bone guided by the BioOss Collagen^® scaffold. It seems that the mechanical stability provided by BioOss Collagen^® and furthermore by a free gingival graft could act as a placeholder preventing the soft tissue from collapsing.     

Lateral ridge augmentation by the use of grafts comprised of autologous bone or a biomaterial. An experiment in the dog

OBJECTIVE: The present investigation was performed to determine if a block of Bio-Oss used as an onlay graft can be used as a scaffold for new bone formation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five mongrel dogs were used. The mandibular premolars were extracted. On both sides of the mandible, the buccal bone plate was resected and defects, about 25 mm long, 8 mm high and 5 mm wide, were produced After 3 months of healing, a second surgical procedure was performed. In the left side, a block of Bio-Oss was adjusted to the buccal bone wall. The graft had the shape of a cylinder and was retained with a miniscrew and covered with a collagen membrane. In the contra-lateral side of the mandible, a block biopsy was first obtained from the ascending ramus. This bone graft had the shape of a cylinder that was 8 mm in diameter and 3 mm thick. The graft was transferred to the experimental site, adjusted to the buccal wall, retained with a miniscrew, and covered with a membrane. The flaps were repositioned and closed with sutures to ensure a complete coverage of the experimental sites. After 6 months of healing, the dogs were sacrificed and the experimental sites dissected. The biopsies were processed for ground sectioning. The sections were stained in toluidine blue, examined in the microscope, and a number of histo- and morphometric assessments made. RESULTS: The study demonstrated that cortical bone used as an onlay graft in the lateral aspect of the alveolar ridge, during a 6-month period of healing integrated with the host bone but underwent marked peripheral resorption. Thus, close to 30% of the height and 50% of the length of the graft was replaced with connective tissue. It was further observed that while the dimensions of a graft which contained a scaffold of cancellous bovine bone mineral remained unchanged, only moderate amounts of new bone formed at the base of this graft. CONCLUSION: Grafts of autologous cortical bone, placed on the surface of a one-wall defect, may undergo marked resorption during healing. A similar graft of Bio-Oss may retain its dimension, and limited amounts of new bone will form within the biomaterial.     

唇、腭侧联合入路修复牙槽突裂的临床初步研究

目的：探讨唇、腭侧联合入路修复牙槽突裂的临床效果。方法45例先天性牙槽突裂患者接受植骨手术修复,其中21例（年龄9~13岁,平均年龄10.3岁）行唇、腭侧联合入路植骨修复（实验组）,24例（年龄9~14岁,平均年龄11.2岁）行唇侧入路植骨修复（对照组）。术后1~12个月随访,采用临床回顾性研究的方法比较2组术后疼痛、肿胀程度;牙槽突裂植骨成功率评价的临床分级标准一般以Bergland牙槽突裂植骨分级标准进行评价。结果实验组在术后疼痛、肿胀程度均低于对照组;实验组植骨手术成功率81%,对照组植骨手术成功率42%。结论唇、腭侧联合入路植骨修复牙槽突裂手术创伤小、术后不良反应少,临床效果满意。     

����ʽ�����ձ�����

??There are many oral factors causing the defect and loss of alveolar bone??including the damage of alveolar surgery??the alveolar bone absorption after tooth extraction??the odontogenic inflammation and dental trauma??mandible cysts and tumors. The dental trauma and odontogenic inflammation are the most common factors which cause the alveolar bone defect and loss. This article will analyze the reasons and prevention of the dental trauma and odontogenic inflammation which cause the loss of alveolar bone and describe the methods of dealing with the defect and loss of alveolar bone.     

Alveolar ridge augmentation with a prototype trilayer membrane and various bone grafts: a histomorphometric study in baboons

Barrier membranes have become a standard treatment option in alveolar ridge augmentation prior to implant placement. However, non-resorbable membranes require secondary surgery and resorbable membranes show an unfavorable degradation profile. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of a slowly biodegradable/bioresorbable prototype trilayer membrane (PTLM) for supporting bone regeneration in alveolar ridge augmentation. Clinically relevant cavities were made 3 months after the extraction of the first and second molars in each jaw of six baboons. Each animal was treated with four different regimens: (1) autogenous bone block (ABB) alone, (2) ABB+PTLM, (3) deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM)+PTLM and (4) no treatment. After 9 months, the baboons were sacrificed and block sections of the augmented area were subjected to histologic and histomorphometric analyses. Newly formed bone areas were determined at a distance of 1, 3, 7 and 10 mm from crestal. The data showed a well-preserved ridge profile at the membrane-protected sites, whereas non-protected bone blocks and control sites underwent severe resorption resulting in knife-edge ridge profiles. Significant differences were found between ABB+PTLM and ABB (P=0.0137-0.0232). DBBM+PTLM also produced a larger bone area compared with ABB alone (P=0.0396-0.0439). No significant difference in bone area was detectable between ABB+PTLM and DBBM+PTLM (P>0.05). The present study supports the use of the slowly biodegradable/bioresorbable PTLM with autografts and DBBM for lateral ridge augmentation in this type of bone defects.     

Bio-Gide生物膜在单侧齿槽裂植骨的临床应用研究

目的：将Bio-Gide生物膜覆盖单侧齿槽裂植骨区,观察植骨区新骨形成状况,探讨提高齿槽裂植骨效果的新方法。方法：选取65例无其他系统性疾病的单侧齿槽裂病例,随机分为单纯应用髂骨骨松质组和髂骨骨松质＋Bio-Gide生物膜组。应用常规齿槽裂植骨手术方法,分别进行髂骨骨松质移植和Bio-Gide生物膜覆盖移植髂骨骨松质。手术后6个月随访,摄X线咬合片观察齿槽裂植骨区新骨生成,分别采用Witherow氏评分标准和Enemark氏评价标准,分析评价二种植骨方法在单侧齿槽裂修复中的疗效。结果：髂骨骨松质移植组Witherow氏植骨评分分值（4.84±1.78）低于髂骨骨松质移植＋Bio-Gide生物膜组评分分值（6.05±2.16）,有显著性差异（P〈0.05）。根据Enemark氏评价标准,髂骨骨松质移植＋Bio-Gide生物膜组齿槽裂植骨成活率（95.8%）及临床成功率（83.3%）均高于单纯应用髂骨骨松质移植组（85.4%及63.4%）。结论：Bio-Gide生物膜的应用能有效地提高齿槽裂髂骨骨松质移植的新骨形成。     

Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration and a synthetic bone substitute or a bovine‐derived xenograft: a randomized,controlled clinical trial

Objectives: The aim of this randomized, controlled clinical trial was to compare the potential of a synthetic bone substitute or a bovine‐derived xenograft combined with a collagen membrane to preserve the alveolar ridge dimensions following tooth extraction. Methods: Twenty‐seven patients were randomized into two treatment groups following single tooth extraction in the incisor, canine and premolar area. In the test group, the alveolar socket was grafted with Straumann Bone Ceramic^® (SBC), while in the control group, Bio‐Oss^® deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) was applied. In both groups, a collagen barrier was used to cover the grafting material. Complete soft tissue coverage of the barriers was not achieved. After 8 months, during re‐entry procedures and before implant placement, the horizontal and vertical dimensions of the residual ridge were re‐evaluated and trephine biopsies were performed for histological analysis in all patients. Results: Twenty‐six patients completed the study. The bucco‐lingual dimension of the alveolar ridge decreased by 1.1±1 mm in the SBC group and by 2.1±1 in the DBBM group (P<0.05). Both materials preserved the mesio‐distal bone height of the ridge. No differences in the width of buccal and palatal bone plate were observed between the two groups. The histological analysis showed new bone formation in the apical part of the biopsies, which, in some instances, was in direct contact with both SBC and DBBM particles. The coronal part of the biopsies was occupied by a dense fibrous connective tissue surrounding the SBC and DBBM particles. Conclusion: Both biomaterials partially preserved the width and the interproximal bone height of the alveolar ridge. To cite this article:
Mardas N, Chadha V, Donos N. Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration and a synthetic bone substitute or a bovine‐derived xenograft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21 , 2010; 688–698.