The effects of unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin and danaparoid on the thromboelastogram (TEG): an in-vitro comparison of standard and heparinase-modified TEGs with conventional coagulation assays.

To investigate the effects of unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and danaparoid (DPD) added to whole blood in vitro on standard and heparinase-modified thromboelastogram (TEG) parameters compared with conventional assays of coagulation. The effects of UFH, LMWH and DPD on standard TEG parameters were compared with the prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin time and anti-activated factor X (anti-FXa) activity, at concentrations of these anticoagulants ranging from 0.025 to 1 U/ml. In the second part of the study, the effects of very low concentrations (0.005-0.05 U/ml) of UFH, LMWH and DPD on the difference between standard and heparinase-modified TEG parameters were compared with the prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin time and anti-FXa activity. Standard TEG parameters were outside the reference range at lower concentrations of UFH, LMWH and DPD than most conventional coagulation assays were able to detect. Only anti-FXa activity was more sensitive to the presence of these anticoagulants than the standard TEG alone. The lowest concentration of UFH, LMWH and DPD used in this study (0.005 U/ml) caused significant differences between the standard and heparinase-modified alpha-angles of the TEG. In addition, the difference between standard and heparinase-modified TEG parameters distinguished between low concentrations (0.005-0.05 U/ml) of UFH with greater sensitivity than anti-FXa activity, but were less sensitive to LMWH and DPD. The standard TEG is more sensitive to UFH, LMWH and DPD than most conventional coagulation tests, with the exception of anti-FXa activity. Calculation of the difference between standard and heparinase-modified TEG parameters greatly increases the sensitivity of the assay for the effects of these anticoagulants, and is more sensitive to very low quantities of UFH than anti-FXa activity.     

A rationally designed heparin, M118, has anticoagulant activity similar to unfractionated heparin and different from Lovenox in a cell-based model of thrombin generation

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) enhances antithrombin (AT) inhibition of thrombin (IIa) and factor Xa (FXa). Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) primarily enhance AT inhibition of FXa. M118 is a LMWH produced from UFH and retains its ability to promote both FXa and IIa inhibition. We tested the hypothesis that M118 has anticoagulant activities similar to UFH in an in vitro model of coagulation. Platelet IIa generation was assessed in a cell-based model that mimics aspects of coagulation in vivo. Inhibition of IIa generation as a function of concentration was steeper for UFH than Lovenox. The effect of M118 closely paralleled that of UFH. By contrast, M118 did not prolong the aPTT to as great a degree as UFH, though both prolonged the aPTT more than did Lovenox. Our data suggest that the ability to inhibit platelet surface IIa generation correlates with the therapeutic level of heparins and confirms similarities between the anticoagulant properties of M118 and UFH. Fred Spencer, MD served as a guest editor.     

Intestinal absorption of low molecular weight heparin in animals and human subjects

INTRODUCTION: We had previously shown that the use of bile salts, which act as surfactants, facilitates the intestinal absorption of large molecules such as those of heparin and insulin. However, the bioavailability of unfractionated heparin (UFH) administered through the large intestine was low. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the absorption of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) combined with bile salts through the gut mucosa in animals and human subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: LMWH (Fragmin, Kabi-Pharmacia, Stockholm) or UFH with or without sodium cholate (Sch) was administrated rectally in rats and healthy volunteers via a microenema. Absorption was estimated by the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), the plasma anti-factor Xa activity and the plasma lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activation. RESULTS: In groups of 6 rats, LMWH at doses of 100--1,000 U with sodium cholate (10--20 mg/ml) was readily absorbed through the gut mucosa, as indicated by both, anti-factor Xa levels of up to 1 U/ml and a dose-dependent activation of LPL. The absorption was significantly superior to that of UFH with Sch or LMWH given without Sch (p < 0.001). The plasma anti-factor Xa levels in the 6 healthy volunteers who received a microenema containing 25,000 U of LMWH with 20 mg/ml of Sch were 0.38 U/ml at 15 min and 0.1 U/ml at 240 min. LPL activation and aPTT prolongation were also observed in these subjects. The plasma LMWH levels after rectal application were in the same range as those obtained after subcutaneous administration, however the elimination time (t 1/2) was shorter. There were no adverse reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Intestinal absorption of LMWH facilitated by Sch is both feasible and safe. A slow release formulation will be needed to prolong the plasma half-life.     

The activated clotting time can be used to monitor the low molecular weight heparin dalteparin after intravenous administration

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare the dose response of dalteparin versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) on the activated clotting time (ACT), and to determine whether the ACT can be used to monitor intravenous (IV) dalteparin during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: The use of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) during PCI has been limited by the presumed inability to monitor its anticoagulant effect using bedside assays. METHODS: This study was performed in three phases. In vitro, ACTs were measured on volunteer (n = 10) blood samples spiked with increasing concentrations of dalteparin or UFH. To extend these observations in vivo, ACTs were then measured in patients (n = 15) who were sequentially treated with IV dalteparin and then UFH. Finally, a larger monitoring study was undertaken involving patients (n = 110) who received dalteparin 60 or 80 international U (IU)/kg alone or followed by abciximab. We measured ACT (Hemochron), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), plasma anti-Xa and anti-IIa levels, tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) concentration, and plasma dalteparin concentration. RESULTS: Dalteparin induced a significant rise in the ACT with a smaller degree of variance as compared to UFH. Five min after administration of IV dalteparin 80 IU/kg the ACT increased from 125 s (122 s, 129 s) to 184 s (176 s, 191 s) (p < 0.001). The aPTT, anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities, and TFPI concentration also demonstrated significant increases following IV dalteparin. CONCLUSIONS: The ACT and aPTT are sensitive to IV dalteparin at clinically relevant doses. These data suggest that the ACT may be useful in monitoring the anticoagulant effect of intravenously administered dalteparin during PCI.     

The course of disseminated intravascular coagulation is predicted by changes in thrombin-antithrombin III complex levels--is there any difference between treatment with standard heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin?

Changes in thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT) over a one week period studied in 42 cases of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC); 19 treated with standard (or unfractionated) heparin (UFH) and 23 treated with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Closer examination of short term changes in TAT (determined 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after starting anticoagulant therapy) was performed in ten cases of DIC; six treated with UFH and four treated with LMWH. In twelve of the 19 cases of DIC treated with UFH and 19 of the 23 cases treated with LMWH, plasma levels of TAT decreased one day after starting anticoagulant therapy, and no exacerbation of DIC was observed for the following week. In the other cases, these levels further increased and most patients had persistently high levels of TAT for the next week. Plasma levels of TAT were significantly lower in patients treated with LMWH than in those treated with UFH, which may suggest that LMWH is more beneficial in DIC. A transient increase in plasma levels of TAT was observed 6 h after the start of anticoagulant therapy in two of the six cases treated with UFH and one of the four cases treated with LMWH. From these results we conclude that fluctuation of TAT was not influenced by the type of heparin (UFH or LMWH), and that the course of DIC for the following week can be predicted by the changes in plasma TAT levels one day after starting anticoagulant therapy.     

The activated clotting time (ACT) can be used to monitor enoxaparin and dalteparin after intravenous administration

BACKGROUND: The use of low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been limited by the presumed inability to monitor its anticoagulant effect using bedside assays. OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare the dose-response of enoxaparin, dalteparin and unfractionated heparin (UFH) on the activated clotting time (ACT), and to determine whether the ACT or aPTT can be used to monitor intravenous (IV) low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). METHODS: A total of 130 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization were assigned to intravenous enoxaparin 0.5 mg/kg, dalteparin 50 international units/kg or UFH 50 units/kg. Of the 130 patients, 46 (35%) underwent PCI, all of whom received a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor. We measured ACT, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and plasma anti-Xa levels after serial sampling. RESULTS: Both enoxaparin and dalteparin induced a significant rise in the ACT and aPTT, with an ACT dose-response approximately one-half the magnitude of that obtained using UFH. The time course of changes in the ACT and aPTT after administration of enoxaparin and dalteparin was virtually identical, with a return to baseline at approximately 2 hours. The enoxaparin and dalteparin-treated patients successfully underwent PCI with no major hemorrhagic complications. CONCLUSIONS: The ACT is equally sensitive to IV enoxaparin and dalteparin. These data support an ACT-guided strategy for intravenously administered LMWH during PCI. Additional studies with larger patient populations may be indicated to determine the ideal target ACT for LMWH in PCI.     

Antibodies to platelet factor 4-heparin after cardiopulmonary bypass in patients anticoagulated with unfractionated heparin or a low-molecular-weight heparin : clinical implications for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) induces platelet activation with release of platelet factor 4 (PF4), and patients are exposed to high doses of heparin (H). We investigated whether this contributes to the development of antibodies to H-PF4 and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). METHODS AND RESULTS: CPB was performed with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in 328 patients. After surgery, patients received UFH (calcium heparin, 200 IU. kg-1. d-1) (group 1, n=157) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH, Dalteparin, 5000 IU once daily) (group 2, n=171). Eight days after surgery, antibodies to H-PF4 were present in 83 patients (25.3%), 46 in group 1 and 37 in group 2 (P=0.12). Most patients (61%) had IgG1 to H-PF4, but only 8 samples with antibodies induced platelet activation with positive results on serotonin release assay. HIT occurred in 6 patients in group 1, but no thrombocytopenia was observed in subjects receiving LMWH, although 2 had high levels of antibodies with positive serotonin release assay results. When antibodies to H-PF4 were present, mean platelet counts were lower only in patients with FcgammaRIIA R/R131 platelets. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence that the development of antibodies to H-PF4 after CPB performed with UFH is not influenced by the postoperative heparin treatment. The antibodies associated with high risk of HIT are mainly IgG1, which is present at high titers in the plasma of patients continuously treated with UFH.     

Interactions of oversulfated chondroitin sulfate (OSCS) from different sources with unfractionated heparin

In 2008, oversulfated chondroitin sulfate (OSCS) was identified as the main contaminant in recalled heparin. Oversulfated chondroitin sulfate can be prepared from bovine (B), porcine (P), shark (Sh), or skate (S) origin and may produce changes in the antithrombotic, bleeding, and hemodynamic profile of heparins. This study examines the interactions of various OSCSs on heparin in animal models of thrombosis and bleeding, as well as on the anticoagulant and antiprotease effects in in vitro assays. Mixtures of 70% unfractionated heparin (UFH) with 30% OSCS from different sources were tested. In the in vitro activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) assay, all contaminant mixtures showed a decrease in clotting times. In addition, a significant increase in bleeding time compared to the control (UFH/saline) was observed. In the thrombosis model, no significant differences were observed. The OSCSs significantly increased anti-Xa activity in ex vivo blood samples. These results indicate that various sources of OSCS affect the hemostatic properties of heparin.     

Determination of antithrombin-dependent factor Xa inhibitors by prothrombin-induced clotting time

Prothrombinase-induced clotting time (PiCT) determines the anticoagulant effects of heparins, low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), and direct thrombin inhibitors. At present, this is the only method that measures the effects of all of these inhibitors, in contrast to the prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), Heptest, ecarin clotting time, and the chromogenic assays. The antithrombin-dependent direct factor (F) Xa inhibitors fondaparinux and idraparinux were compared with the LMWH dalteparin on PiCT, aPTT, Heptest, and chromogenic anti-FXa assays in pooled human normal plasma samples. Fondaparinux and idraparinux prolonged the coagulation times in the PiCT, Heptest, and chromogenic FXa assays in a dose-dependent manner, in contrast to the aPTT. We conclude that PiCT is a suitable assay to determine the anticoagulant effects of these two new FXa inhibitors in patients receiving treatment with these compounds.     

Comparison between siliconized evacuated glass and plastic blood collection tubes for prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time assay in normal patients, patients on oral anticoagulant therapy and patients with unfractioned heparin therapy

Introduction: The study was designed to evaluate whether there was a statistically significant effect between evacuated glass tubes and plastic tubes on prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Methods: Blood samples were drawn into four different tubes from three patient populations—apparently healthy patients, patients on oral anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists (OAT‐vka) and patients being treated with unfractioned heparin (UFH). Testing was performed on an automated coagulation analyzer, and statistical analysis was achieved using a test of variance (anova ). Results: For normal patients, there were no statistically significant differences for the aPTT test; however, there were statistically significant differences for the PT test. For patients on OAT‐vka, statistically significant differences were clearly observed between the four tube types for the PT test. For patients treated with UFH, there were no statistically significant differences for the aPTT test. Conclusion: The data showed a statistically significant difference between glass and plastic tubes in the normal population only for the PT test, with consequent repercussions for patients on OAT. This means that appropriate care and validation should take place whenever there is a change in tube type.     

Haemorrhagic effect of enoxaparin, a low molecular weight heparin. Comparison with unfractionated heparin in humans.

The haemorrhagic effects of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and the low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) enoxaparin were investigated and compared in the gastric mucosa (haemorrhage induced by biopsy) and skin (haemorrhage induced by Simplate) of 12 healthy volunteers. Administration of UFH and LMWH (given in a dose of 75 anti-Xa U/kg intravenously) increased median gastric bleeding time (3.5 min) and geometric mean blood loss (11.5 microliters) to 19 min (p = 0.00003) and 54.1 microliters (p = 0.0021) after UFH and to 13 min (p = 0.008) and 29.0 microliters (p = 0.275) after LMWH. Median skin bleeding time (4.25 min) increased to 6.0 min after UFH (p = 0.003) and to 6.75 min after LMWH (p = 0.0008). Mean heparin activity in plasma was 20% higher after LMWH than after UFH. The calculated gastric bleeding time to heparin activity ratio was significantly lower for LMWH than for UFH (p < 0.05).     

The anticoagulant capacity of plasmatic unfractionated heparin decreases at 23 degrees C.

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) are important clinical anticoagulants. As polynegative molecules they are potential triggers of the contact phase of coagulation. An incubation temperature lower than the physiological 37 degrees C favours intrinsic haemostasis activation by the polynegative molecule SiO2. The efficiency of UFH and LMWH after a plasmatic preincubation at 37 or at 23 degrees C is therefore studied. Samples (150 mul) of unfrozen pooled normal plasma supplemented with 0, 0.01, 0.1, or 1 IU/ml heparin or dalteparin in 5-ml polystyrole tubes were incubated for 10-70 min at 37 or at 23 degrees C. The extrinsic coagulation activity assay (EXCA) was then performed. Preincubation at 37 degrees C of 0.1 IU/ml plasmatic UFH does not result in any thrombin generation in EXCA-1, whereas preincubation at 23 degrees C results in a thrombin generation of about 0.1 IU/ml thrombin. Plasmatic UFH (0.01 IU/ml) at 23 degrees C acts nearly half as efficiently as 0.01 IU/ml plasmatic LMWH. Polynegatively charged niches particularly in the larger UFH molecule might trigger the contact system of haemostasis, especially at 23 degrees C. In contrast, the anticoagulant capacity of LMWH does not change significantly with temperature.     

Perioperative bridging therapy with unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves on long-term oral anticoagulants (from the REGIMEN Registry)

Patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves require long-term oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT). During the temporary interruption of OAT, bridging anticoagulant therapy with unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended. This prespecified subgroup analysis from REGIMEN-a large, prospective, multicenter registry-compared UFH (n = 73) and LMWH (n = 172) as bridging anticoagulation in patients with mechanical heart valves on long-term OAT. Patient demographics and co-morbidities were generally similar between groups. There were more bileaflet valves in the LMWH group (67.4% vs 43.8%, p = 0.0005), but no differences in valve positions between groups. The LMWH group was less likely to undergo major surgery (33.7% vs 58.9%, p = 0.0002) and cardiothoracic surgery (7.6% vs 19.2%, p = 0.008), and to receive intraprocedural anticoagulants or thrombolytics (4.1% vs 13.7%, p = 0.007). Major adverse event rates (5.5% vs 10.3%, p = 0.23) and major bleeds (4.2% vs 8.8%, p = 0.17) were similar in the LMWH and UFH groups, respectively; 1 arterial thromboembolic event occurred in each group. More LMWH-bridged patients were treated as outpatients or discharged from the hospital in <24 hours (68.6% vs 6.8%, p <0.0001). Multivariate logistic analysis found no significant differences in major bleeds and major composite adverse events when adjusting for cardiothoracic or major surgery between groups. In conclusion, for patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves on long-term OAT, mostly outpatient-based LMWH bridging therapy appears to be feasible for selected procedures, is as safe as UFH, and is associated with a low arterial thromboembolic rate.     

Lack of correlation between heparin dose and standard clinical monitoring tests in treatment with unfractionated heparin in critically ill children

The activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and anti-Xa activity are used for monitoring unfractionated heparin (UFH) therapy in children and may not be optimal. OBJECTIVE: Determine correlations of aPTT, anti-Xa and UFH dose in children. Single centre prospective cohort study in children receiving UFH. The aPTT and anti-Xa results from routine coagulation monitoring were collected. Thirty-nine children (median age 18 days) were enrolled. There was no relationship between aPTT and UFH dose (r2=0.12) or anti-Xa and UFH dose (r2=0.03) or aPTT and anti-Xa (r2=0.22). aPTT and anti-Xa do not accurately monitor UFH therapy in children.     

Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of low-molecular weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin anticoagulation after heart valve surgery

Although unfractionated heparin (UFH) is used routinely after heart valve surgery at many institutions, cardiovascular surgery patients have a particularly high risk for developing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or UFH after heart valve surgery by conducting a retrospective evaluation of consecutive cardiovascular surgery patients in whom the LMWH dalteparin (n = 100) was used as the postoperative anticoagulant. This group was compared to an earlier group of patients who received UFH (n = 103). The main outcomes included the efficacy of the anticoagulant regimens (determined by the incidence of valve thrombosis, arterial thromboembolic events, and venous thromboembolic events) and the safety (determined by major bleeding, HIT, thrombotic events in HIT-positive cases, and death). Overall, there were for fewer thrombotic events in the LMWH-treated group (4% vs 11%, p = 0.11). There was a higher rate of bleeding events in the UFH-treated group (10% vs 3%, p = 0.08). Six patients in the UFH-treated group developed HIT, 4 of whom had thrombotic events (HIT with thrombosis). In the LMWH-treated group, 3 patients developed HIT, 1 of whom had HIT with thrombosis. In conclusion, in this study, an LMWH regimen after heart valve surgery was effective and safe, with fewer thrombotic, bleeding, HIT, and HIT with thrombosis events.     

低分子肝素和普通肝素在主动脉内球囊反搏术中抗凝应用的临床观察

目的:观察低分子肝素(LMWH) 和普通肝素（UFH）在主动脉内球囊反搏术（IABP）中抗凝应用的临床效果。方法: 68例安置IABP的患者随机分为应用UFH抗凝的常规组（34例）和应用LMWH抗凝的试药组（34例），观察两组患者的出血、血肿、血栓形成等并发症发生情况及费用差别。结果: 两组均只有少部分患者有伤口少量渗血、局部小血肿和伤口周围轻度青紫等表现，无其它并发症出现，两组比较差异无显著性。但试药组的费用比常规组低，两组比较差异有显著性。结论: 在IABP中应用LMWH可以达到应用UFH相同的抗凝、预防血栓形成的效果，同时并发症无增加，而费用减少。     

Low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin in the treatment of patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism

BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) appears to be as effective as unfractionated heparin (UFH) for both treatment and prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), but limited data are available for its use in acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether enoxaparin, a LMWH, was clinically as efficient and safe as UFH in patients with a diagnosis of acute PTE. MATERIAL AND METHODS: After exclusion of those with massive forms, 59 patients with acute PTE were randomly assigned to either subcutaneous enoxaparin given twice daily (1 mg/kg/dose) or adjusted dose intravenous UFH. Oral anticoagulant treatment was begun on the second day and was given for at least 6 months. We compared the treatment regimens at day 8 and day 90 with respect to a combined end point of major bleeding, recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), and death. RESULTS: In the first 8 days of treatment, 1 of 30 patients assigned to receive UFH (3.3%) reached one of the end points (recurrence), as compared with none of 29 patients assigned to enoxaparin. Statistically this difference was not significant (p = 0.508). By day 90, 3 patients assigned to UFH (10%) had symptomatic recurrent VTE, as compared with 1 patient assigned to enoxaparin (3.4%). There was neither major bleeding nor death in the study groups. There was an absolute difference of 6.4 percentage points between the two treatment groups, but the difference was statistically not significant (p = 0.318). CONCLUSION: Initial subcutaneous treatment with enoxaparin appeared to be as effective and safe as UFH in acute PTE.     

Low molecular weight heparin and non valvular atrial fibrillation

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) are obtained through chemical or enzyme depolymerisation of unfractioned heparins (UFH). LMWHs present several advantages over UFH: they exhibit a smaller interindividual variability of the anticoagulant effect, they have a greater bioavailability, a longer plasma half-life and do not require monitoring of the anticoagulant effect. LMWH have restrictive indications in AF patients, cardioversion (II level C and TEE for ACC/AHA/ESC and 2C for ACCP guidelines) or use as a bridge therapy (IIB, level C for ACC/AHA/ESC). The ACE study (Anticoagulation for cardioversion using enoxaparin), showed a reduction, though not statistically significant, of 42% of the composite end point (embolic event, major bleeding and death) 2.8% under enoxaparin vs. 4.8 % under conventional treatment, relative risk 0.58, CI 95% 0.23-1.46). Other studies, using dalteparin, confirmed that an anticoagulant treatment using LMWH followed by warfarin was at least as good as conventional management. ACUTE II (Assessment of cardioversion using transesophageal echochardiography), a randomized multicenter trial, compared the efficacy and tolerance of enoxaparin (1 mg/kg every 12 hours) and UFH in 155 patients eligible for a TEE-guided cardioversion. These patients were administered LMWH or UFH for 24 hours before TEE or cardioversion. There were no significative differences regarding the incidence of the study end points, in particular stroke and bleeding, and no death occurred. HAEST (Heparin in acute embolic stroke trial), a randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind trial failed to show the LMWH superiority over aspirin in patients with acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation. Finally, LMWH have been proposed as a bridge therapy in patients under chronic VKA prior to surgery or invasive procedures. This strategy resulted in a low rate of thromboembolic events and major bleedings.     

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characterization of a medium-molecular-weight heparin in comparison with UFH and LMWH

Despite the well-established medical use of heparins, the question arises whether the efficacy-safety ratio of the available heparins can still be improved. Therefore, a medium-molecular-weight heparin (MMWH), a new heparin with an average molecular weight of 10.5 kDa and a narrow molecular weight range (9.5 to 11.5 kDa) was developed. Its in vitro activities amount to 174.9 anti-factor Xa (aXa) U/mg and 170.0 antithrombin (aIIa) U/mg. In the presented randomized, double-blind, cross-over study in healthy volunteers, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of MMWH are compared with those of an unfractionated heparin (UFH) and a low-molecular-weight heparin (LWMH; enoxaparin). After subcutaneous administration of 9000 aXa-U of either heparin in 16 volunteers, the prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), the aXa activity, and the aIIa activities were determined at 11 time points spread over 24 hours after injection. The ex vivo analysis revealed striking pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic differences between the three heparins. UFH had the lowest bioavailability regarding the aPTT, aXa, and aIIa activities. Enoxaparin exhibited only low aIIa activity but the highest aXa activity. Unlike UFH and enoxaparin, MMWH showed a high recovery of aIIa activity, which suggests that it combines the high potency to inhibit thrombin that characterizes UFH with the high bioavailability of the LMWHs. Consequently, substantially lower doses are needed to bring about effects comparable to those of UFH and LMWH.     

Low-molecular-weight heparin vs. unfractionated heparin in percutaneous coronary intervention: a combined analysis.

This meta-analysis assessed the rates of the efficacy and safety endpoints with intravenous low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Subcutaneous LMWH has compared favorably with UFH, but limited experience exists with intravenous LMWH for immediate anticoagulation in PCI. The meta-analysis included data from eight randomized trials in which patients received LMWH (n = 1,037) or UFH (n = 978) during PCI. Seven additional nonrandomized studies/registries were analyzed to assess the efficacy and safety of LMWH during PCI. Efficacy endpoints were ischemic events (usually a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and urgent revascularization) and the safety endpoint was bleeding (major, minor, or all bleeding). In the randomized studies, LMWH was comparable with UFH in terms of efficacy (6.2% vs. 7.5%) and major bleeding (0.9% vs. 1.8%). The analysis of pooled data, randomized or not, suggests potential improved efficacy (5.8% vs. 7.6%) and reduced major bleeding (0.6% vs. 1.8%) with LMWH (n = 3,787) compared with UFH (n = 978). During PCI, intravenous LMWH without coagulation monitoring has the potential to be at least as safe and efficacious as intravenous UFH. Further studies of LMWHs in PCI are therefore required.