Myocardial damage in high-risk patients undergoing elective endovascular or open infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) provides an objective assessment of the presence and extent of coronary artery disease. Therefore we compared cardiac outcome in patients at high-cardiac risk undergoing open or endovascular repair of infrarenal AAA using preoperative DSE results. METHODS: Consecutive patients with >or=3 cardiac risk factors (age >70 years, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, renal failure, and diabetes mellitus) undergoing infrarenal AAA repair were reviewed retrospectively. All underwent cardiac stress testing using DSE. Postoperatively data on troponin release and ECG were collected on day 1, 3, 7, before discharge, and on day 30. The main outcome measures were perioperative myocardial damage and myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death. RESULTS: All 77 patients (39 endovascular, 38 open) had a history of cardiac disease. The number and type of cardiac risk factors were similar in both groups. Also DSE results were similar: 55 vs 56%, 24 vs 28%, and 21 vs 18% had no, limited, or extensive stress induced myocardial ischemia respectively. The incidence of perioperative myocardial damage (47% vs 13%, p=0.001) and the combination of myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death (13% vs 0%, p=0.02) was significantly lower in patients receiving endovascular repair. CONCLUSION: In patients with similar high cardiac risk, endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms is associated with a reduced incidence of perioperative myocardial damage.     

Peroperative factors influencing the outcome of elective abdominal aorta aneurysm repair.

PURPOSE: To identify perioperative variables which may influence mortality of elective abdominal aneurysm repair (AAA). METHOD: prospective study of patients undergoing elective AAA repair between 1986 and 1997. RESULTS: Four hundred and seventy patients (438 men, 32 females) with a mean age of 69.4+/-13 years and aneurysms with a diameter of 60+/-3 mm were operated on with a 1-month mortality rate of 5.3%. Multivariate analysis identified the following independent risk factors for mortality: age >70 (p<0.0001), a past history of myocardial infarction (p<0.0001), preoperative renal insufficiency (p<0.0001), reoperation (p<0.0001), colonic necrosis (p<0.0001), and severe postoperative medical complications (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Intra- and postoperative events affect the outcome of AAA repair, independently of preoperative factors, and should be described when presenting the results of AAA repair.     

Perioperative myocardial injury after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair predicts outcome.

OBJECTIVE: Myocardial injury, detected by rises in cardiac troponin I (TnI), is common and associated with decreased survival following open AAA surgery. We examined the relationship between perioperative myocardial injury and postoperative outcome. DESIGN: Observational Cohort Study. METHODS: Forty-three consecutive patients who underwent elective open AAA repair were screened for perioperative myocardial injury or infarction using serial TnI measurements (taken on days 1, 3, and 7), ECG and clinical assessment. The primary outcome was survival free of cardiac failure, or myocardial infarction (MI) at follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty (47%) of the 43 patients had a TnI elevation. Of these, 11 (26%) patients met the criteria for MI. At a mean (+/-SD) follow-up of 1.5+/-0.8 years, 12 (28%) subjects had experienced at least one endpoint event. Survival free of cardiac failure or MI was 55% in patients who had TnI rises compared to 87% in those without (P=0.02). Logistic regression revealed that TnI elevation was an independent predictor of outcome with an odds ratio of 5.4 (95% CI 1.2-2.4, P=0.03). CONCLUSION: Perioperative myocardial injury after elective open AAA repair predicts outcome after surgery. Routine TnI measurement should be considered in all patients, especially in those with high cardiovascular risk.     

The prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm and concomitant coronary artery disease

Patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are at increased risk for cardiovascular complications such as cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Dobutamine stress echocardiography is an established, cost-effective technique for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). This review will focus on the additional prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography for perioperative and late prognosis in patients with AAA and CAD.     

Selective evaluation and management of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. A 16-year experience.

Reduction of cardiac mortality associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair remains an important goal. Five hundred consecutive urgent or elective operations for infrarenal nonruptured AAA were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups based on preoperative cardiac status: group I (n = 260, 52%), no clinical or electrocardiographic (ECG) evidence of coronary artery disease (CAD); group II (n = 212, 42.2%), clinical or ECG evidence of CAD considered stable after further evaluation with studies such as dipyridamole-thallium scanning, echocardiography, or coronary arteriography; group III (n = 28, 5.6%), clinical or ECG evidence of CAD considered unstable after further evaluation. Group I had no further cardiac evaluation and groups I and II underwent AAA repair without invasive treatment of CAD. Group III underwent repair of cardiac disease before (n = 21) or coincident with (n = 7) AAA repair. In all instances, perioperative fluid volume management was based on left ventricular performance curves constructed before operation. The 30-day operative mortality rate for AAA repair in all 500 patients was 1.6% (n = 8). There was one (0.4%) cardiac-related operative death in group I, which was significantly less than the five (2.4%) in group II (p less than 0.02). Total mortality for the two groups were also significantly different, with one group I death (0.4%) and seven group II deaths (3.3%), (p less than 0.02). These data support the conclusions that (1) the leading cause of perioperative mortality in AAA repair is myocardial infarction, (2) correction of severe or unstable CAD before or coincident with AAA repair is effective in preventing operative mortality, (3) patients with known CAD should be investigated more thoroughly to identify those likely to develop perioperative myocardial ischemia so that their CAD can be corrected before AAA repair, and (4) patients with no clinical or ECG evidence of CAD rarely die of perioperative myocardial infarction, and thus selective evaluation of CAD based on clinical grounds in AAA patients is justified.     

Application of clinically valid cardiac risk factors to aortic aneurysm surgery

The operative outcome of 97 consecutive nonruptured infrarenal aortic aneurysms is analyzed regarding clinically identifiable cardiac risk factors. Clinically evident coronary artery disease was present in 45 patients (46%). Operative mortality was 4% (four cardiac deaths) with an additional 4% nonfatal postoperative myocardial infarction rate. All cardiac complications occurred in patients with clinically evident coronary artery disease, while no mortality occurred in 52 patients lacking a preoperative history of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or angina. Preoperative risk factors having a significant negative influence on outcome include a history of prior myocardial infarction and compensated congestive heart failure. Few patients with aneurysms who have clinical evidence of coronary artery disease are indicated for coronary arteriography and bypass prior to aneurysm repair. Furthermore, indications for invasive cardiac screening of the patient with an aneurysm who lacks cardiac symptoms are limited.     

A prospective study of subclinical myocardial damage in endovascular versus open repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND: Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is considered to be less invasive and better tolerated by the cardiovascular system than open repair. Our aim was to assess the true incidence of perioperative myocardial damage associated with endovascular vs open infrarenal AAA repair. METHODS: Between July 1999 and June 2001, preoperative and postoperative serum troponin T (TnT) levels were measured in all patients presenting for elective AAA repair at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital. The incidence of myocardial damage was recorded on the basis of standard clinical, biochemical, and electrocardiographic changes or a subclinical increase of 50% or more in serum TnT. Patients were excluded if the TnT increase was associated with a significant increase of serum creatinine (> or =50%) with no other evidence of myocardial ischemia. The differences between the two groups were analyzed with the chi 2 test and odds ratios. RESULTS: A total of 35 open and 112 endovascular AAA repairs were included in the study. There was no significant difference in age, sex, preoperative serum creatinine, or preoperative serum TnT between the two treatment groups. Seventeen patients had biochemical evidence of myocardial damage, which was clinically obvious in only one patient. Even though the incidence of previous myocardial infarction was significantly higher in patients undergoing endovascular repair (41%) than open repair (22%; P < .05), the overall incidence of myocardial damage (clinical or subclinical) was significantly higher in the open group compared with the endovascular group (8 [25%] of 32 vs 9 [8%] of 109, respectively; odds ratio, 3.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-10.49; P < .02). CONCLUSIONS: There is a previously underestimated incidence of subclinical myocardial damage associated with surgery for infrarenal AAA which is lower after endovascular than open repair.     

Analysis of medical risk factors and outcomes in patients undergoing open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE: The emergence of endovascular repair (ER) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has provided surgeons with a new technique that should ideally improve patient outcomes. To more accurately characterize the advantages of ER versus traditional/open AAA repair (TOR), we compared the preoperative medical risk factors (PMRFs) and perioperative outcomes (PO) of those patients undergoing elective treatment of infrarenal AAA with ER and TOR over a recent 18-month period at our center. METHODS: Through our institutional vascular surgery patient registry, all patients undergoing aortic aneurysm repair of any type between December 1999 and June 2001 were identified. Only those patients undergoing elective infrarenal AAA repair were analyzed. Hospital records were examined for all patients, and PMRF and PO were assessed via Society for Vascular Surgery/International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery reporting guidelines. Student t, chi(2), Fisher exact, or Wilcoxon rank sum tests were applied where appropriate to determine differences among PMRF and PO according to method of aneurysm repair. RESULTS: During the 18-month study period, a total of 199 aortic aneurysms were repaired at our institution. Ninety-nine elective infrarenal AAA repairs made up the study cohort (ER, n = 33; TOR, n = 66). When examined by method of aneurysm repair, no differences existed in demographics or AAA size. Patients undergoing ER had a significantly greater degree of preoperative pulmonary comorbidity than patients undergoing TOR (P <.001). However, no differences existed in terms of American Society of Anesthesiologists classification or cardiac (P =.52), cerebrovascular (P =.44), diabetic (P =.51), hypertensive (P =.90), hyperlipidemia (P =.91) or renal (P =.23) comorbidities between the two groups. Perioperative morbidity and mortality rates were also not significantly different by method of repair. ER was associated with shorter operative time, intensive care unit stay, and overall hospital length of stay (P <.0001). However, subsequent operative procedures related to the AAA repair were performed more frequently after ER (TOR = 1.5% versus ER = 15.2%; P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that ER offers improvements in hospital convalescent and operating room times but no beneficial impact on overall morbidity and mortality rates when similar PMRFs exist, especially when used at medical centers where low morbidity and mortality rates are already established for TOR. Other centers performing ER should undertake such an analysis to assess its impact on their patients.     

Outcome after Simultaneous Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair and Aortocoronary Bypass

Myocardial infarction remains the leading cause of early and late death after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Myocardial revascularization is staged either before or concomitant with AAA resection, but results are far from uniform. We retrospectively analyzed our experience with patients who underwent concomitant AAA resection and aortocoronary bypass (ACB) to examine the factors affecting early morbidity/mortality and early results. Forty-two patients (all men; mean age, 67.2 years) underwent simultaneous ACB grafting and AAA repair between 1975 and 1998. All were managed postoperatively in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit (mean stay, 6.1 days). The mean total hospital stay was 17.2 days. Two died in the early postoperative period (4.8%): 1 of sustained myocardial failure following a third ACB, and 1 of coagulopathy after concomitant ACB, aortic valve replacement, and AAA. One patient developed a nonfatal MI on postoperative day 3. The incidence of wound and bleeding complications was higher for patients undergoing both ACB and AAA repair than for patients undergoing AAA resection alone. On follow-up (mean, 10 years; range, 7 months to 15 years), only 2 of 10 late deaths were due to cardiovascular causes. We believe that concomitant myocardial revascularization is warranted in select patients requiring elective or urgent AAA resection in order to decrease perioperative risk and improve late survival. Cardiac failure or ischemia during aortic surgery can be prevented by proper perfusion with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. In patients undergoing simultaneous procedures, the increased risk is related to the severity of the vascular and coronary artery disease and not to the combined operations.     

Chronic kidney disease impacts outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

ObjectiveChronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease are traditionally associated with worse outcomes after endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). This study stratifies outcomes of AAA repair by approach, CKD severity, and dialysis dependence.MethodsAll patients undergoing elective infrarenal open aneurysm repair (OAR) and endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) with preoperative renal function data captured by the Vascular Quality Initiative between January 2003 and September 2020 were analyzed. Patients were stratified by CKD class as follows: CKD stages 1 and 2, CKD stage 3a, CKD stage 3b, CKD stages 4 and 5, and dialysis. Primary outcomes were perioperative and 1-year mortality. Predictors of survival were identified by Cox multivariate regression models.ResultsIn total, 53,867 elective AAA repairs were identified: 5396 (10%) OARs and 48,471 (90%) EVARs. Most patients were White (90%) and male (81%), with a mean age of 73 ± 9 years. Patients who underwent EVAR were older and had more comorbidities. The use of elective EVAR for AAA increased from 52% in 2003 to 91% in 2020 (P < .001). The OAR cohort had more perioperative complications and short-term mortality. The CKD 1 and 2 group had the highest 1-year survival compared with the other groups after both OAR and EVAR. On Cox regression analysis, after EVAR, compared with CKD 1 and 2, worsening CKD stage (CKD 3a: hazard ratio [HR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-1.68; P = .13; CKD 3b: HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.23-2.45; P < .050; CKD 4-5: HR, 3.23; 95% CI, 2.13-4.88; P < .001), and dialysis (HR, 4.48; 95% CI, 1.90-10.6; P < .001) were independently associated with worse 1-year survival rates. After OAR, compared with CKD 1 and 2, worsening CKD stage (CKD 3a: HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.96-1.20; P = .20; CKD 3b: HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.41-1.81; P < .001; CKD 4-5: HR, 2.85; 95% CI, 2.39-3.41; P < .001), and dialysis (HR, 3.79; 95% CI, 3.01-4.76; P < .001) were independently associated with worse 1-year survival rates.ConclusionsRegardless of the treatment approach, CKD severity is an important predictor of perioperative and 1-year mortality rates after infrarenal AAA repair and may reflect the natural history of CKD. Open repair is associated with high perioperative mortality risk in patients with CKD stages 4 and 5, as well as end-stage renal disease. Individualization of patient decision-making is especially important in patients with a glomerular filtration rate of less than 45 and perhaps consideration should be given to raising the threshold for elective AAA repair in these patients. Further studies focusing on appropriate size threshold for repair in these patients may be warranted.     

Perioperative mangement of surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm associated with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery are at increased risk of perioperative cardiovascular complications due to underlying coronary artery disease (CAD). We determined retrospectively the incidence of CAD and the influence of coronary revascularization and perioperative cardiovascular complications in patients for AAA surgery. METHODS: Routine coronary angiography (CAG) was performed in 159 patients prior to elective AAA surgery to estimate the presence of CAD. To compare risk factors and perioperative cardiovascular complications the patients were divided at the time of CAG into three groups: previously diagnosed CAD, newly diagnosed CAD and non-CAD. RESULTS: Preoperative CAG found 129 patients (81%) with CAD. Among newly diagnosed patients 82% were asymptomatic of CAD. Forty-four patients (28%) underwent coronary revascularization (17 percutaneous coronary intervention, 3 preoperative coronary artery bypass grafting, and 24 combined coronary artery bypass grafting). Perioperative cardiac complications occurred in 35 patients (22%). No significant difference was found among the three groups in the incidence of perioperative cardiovascular complications. Two patients with severe CAD not treated with coronary revascularization died of cardiac events. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative management and coronary revascularization should be carried out with more cautions in AAA patients to reduce the incidence of cardiovascular complications after AAA surgery.     

A combination of statins and beta-blockers is independently associated with a reduction in the incidence of perioperative mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the combined beneficial effect of statin and beta-blocker use on perioperative mortality and myocardial infarction (MI) in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery (AAA). BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing elective AAA-surgery identified by clinical risk factors and dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) as being at high-risk often have considerable cardiac complication rate despite the use of beta-blockers. METHODS: We studied 570 patients (mean age 69+/-9 years, 486 males) who underwent AAA-surgery between 1991 and 2001 at the Erasmus MC. Patients were evaluated for clinical risk factors (age>70 years, histories of MI, angina, diabetes mellitus, stroke, renal failure, heart failure and pulmonary disease), DSE, statin and beta-blocker use. The main outcome was a composite of perioperative mortality and MI within 30 days of surgery. RESULTS: Perioperative mortality or MI occurred in 51 (8.9%) patients. The incidence of the composite endpoint was significantly lower in statin users compared to nonusers (3.7% vs. 11.0%; crude odds ratio (OR): 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.13-0.74; p=0.01). After correcting for other covariates, the association between statin use and reduced incidence of the composite endpoint remained unchanged (OR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.10-0.70; p=0.01). Beta-blocker use was also associated with a significant reduction in the composite endpoint (OR: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.11-0.54). Patients using a combination of statins and beta-blockers appeared to be at lower risk for the composite endpoint across multiple cardiac risk strata; particularly patients with 3 or more risk factors experienced significantly lower perioperative events. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of statin and beta-blocker use in patients with AAA-surgery is associated with a reduced incidence of perioperative mortality and nonfatal MI particularly in patients at the highest risk.     

Blood loss and transfusion in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion are known determinants of mortality and morbidity of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The present study analysed the pattern of blood loss and transfusion and evaluated the risk factors of blood loss during open repair of infrarenal AAA. METHODS: Blood loss, transfusion and fluid replacement during elective open repair operation for patients with infrarenal AAA were correlated to demographic data, operative findings and procedural information. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients with a mean age of 71 years was analysed. The mean blood loss was 1000 +/- 887 mL (200-6000 mL). Blood transfusion, with a mean transfusion volume of 400 +/- 591 mL (0-3000 mL), was required in 46% of patients. Univariate analysis showed that bodyweight, renal impairment, low haemoglobin and platelet counts, iliac artery involvement, large aneurysm, bifurcated graft, large graft diameter, prolonged aortic clamp time and long operation time were associated with a higher blood loss. A haemoglobin level of <10.5 g/dL (relative risk (RR): 4.6), platelet count <130 x 10(9)/L (RR: 3.9), aortic clamp time >50 min (RR: 15), total operation time >200 min (RR: 11) and type of graft (RR: 3.5) were identified as independent determinants of blood loss on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative blood loss in elective infrarenal aneurysm surgery is influenced by patients' haematological parameters, distal involvement of aneurysm and degree of difficulty of operation.     

Repair of large abdominal aortic aneurysm should be performed early after coronary artery bypass surgery

PURPOSE: The surgical repair (coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]) of symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with co-existent large abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) may result in an increased rate of AAA rupture after operation. Simultaneous CABG/AAA repair has been recommended by some surgeons, but with a somewhat higher mortality rate than staged repair. We reviewed the outcome of staged AAA repair that was performed early after CABG in patients with symptomatic coronary disease and AAA. METHODS: The records of all the patients with symptomatic CAD that required CABG with large AAA (greater than 5 cm) were reviewed. In most patients, CABG was performed first, followed by AAA repair within 2 weeks. Patient demographics, severity of coronary disease, AAA size, interprocedure duration, and perioperative morbidity and mortality rates were examined. RESULTS: Between 1991 and 1998, 1105 AAA repairs were performed. Within this group, 30 patients with AAA underwent CABG for symptomatic CAD. Mean AAA size was 6.6 cm (range, 5.0-10.0 cm). The median interprocedure interval between CABG and AAA repair was 11.5 days. There was no in-hospital AAA rupture during this interval. The patient group was comprised of 24 men and 6 women with a mean age of 71 years. There was no operative death after such staged AAA repair, and nonfatal complications occurred in seven patients (23%). During this period, seven patients had AAA rupture when they were sent home after CABG for recovery and intended AAA repair at a later date. CONCLUSION: Staged elective AAA repair may be performed safely and effectively after CABG. Performance of these procedures with a short interprocedure interval may be preferable to the higher complication rate observed after combined procedures.     

Late results of coronary bypass in patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysms. The Cleveland Clinic Study.

Cardiac catheterization was performed in a prospective series of 1000 patients under consideration for elective peripheral vascular reconstruction at the Cleveland Clinic from 1978-1982. Of these, 246 patients (mean age: 68 years) presented primarily because of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and are eligible for subsequent evaluation 3-7 years (mean: 4.6 years) after entrance into the study. Severe, surgically correctable coronary artery disease (CAD) was documented in 78 patients (32%) in the AAA group, and 70 patients (28%) received myocardial revascularization with four fatal complications (5.7%). A total of 56 patients in this subset had staged aneurysm resection, usually during the same hospital admission after coronary bypass, with a single death (1.8%) caused by cerebral infarction. The overall operative mortality rate for 126 coronary and AAA procedures was 4%. A total of 59 additional patients (25%) died during the late follow-up interval, including 14 patients (5.9%) with cardiac events and eight patients (3.4%) with ruptured aneurysms. The cumulative 5-year survival rate (75%) and cardiac mortality rate (5%) after coronary bypass reflected traditional parameters (preoperative ventricular function, completeness of revascularization) and are nearly identical to the results calculated for patients having normal coronary arteries or only mild to moderate CAD. In comparison, the cumulative survival and cardiac mortality rates in a small subset of patients with severe, uncorrected coronary involvement currently are 29% (p = 0.0001) and 34%, respectively. These data support the conclusion that selected patients who require elective resection of AAA also warrant myocardial revascularization to enhance perioperative risk and late survival.     

Cardiac risk assessment of asymptomatic patients by stress echocardiography before infrarenal aortic aneurysm surgery

AIM: Aggressive cardiac assessment before aortic abdominal aneurysm (AAA) surgery is indicated for patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD). Assessment of intermediate and moderate risk patients is still under debate. The purpose of the study was to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of stress echocardiography (SE) in the detection of CAD in patients undergoing AAA surgery who have no symptoms and/or signs of CAD, but who have risk factors for it. METHODS: Patients with 1 or more risk factors for CAD underwent SE. All patients with positive SE underwent coronary arteriography, and, when indicated, treatment. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated for SE by comparing results to coronary arteriography. Moreover, major perioperative cardiac events were recorded. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients with AAA and risk factors for CAD were studied. SE was positive in 9 cases, including 7 presenting critical CAD on the basis of coronary arteriography. One major cardiac event (1.1%), a nonfatal myocardial infarction, occurred in 1 patient with positive SE and non-critical, single-vessel CAD. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of SE proved to be 100%, 98%, 78%, 100%, and 92%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Positive SE should be considered a valid method for testing high-risk patients for CAD. The low rate of major cardiac events in this series suggests that cardiac assessment by SE and selective coronary arteriography prior to AAA surgery is effective in asymptomatic patients with one or more risk factors.     

Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the veteran population

Background: The aim of this study was to audit the outcome of elective open aortic aneurysm repair in a veteran hospital to determine whether age ≥80 years influenced the morbidity or mortality. Methods: All elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repaired at Greenslopes Private (Repatriation) Hospital between January 1995 and July 2000 were reviewed. Operative details, premorbid condition, postoperative outcomes as well as length of admission were recorded. Patients were grouped according to age as ≥80 years or <80 years. Results: There were 251 open elective AAA (including infrarenal and suprarenal, as well as recurrent AAA) repairs carried out during this period, 64 of which were patients of age ≥80 years. Cardiovascular risks factors did not differ between groups nor did complication rates for patients ≥80 and <80 years of age (19.1 and 19.8%, respectively). Mortality rates were not significantly different between groups (≥80 years: 6.25%; <80 years: 4.8%; P > 0.6). Conclusions: Age ≥80 years should not be an exclusion criteria when contemplating open elective AAA repair.     

Outcome in patients at high risk after open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

OBJECTIVE: Outcomes after surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in patients at high risk remain poorly defined. We investigated the short-term and long-term results of open repair of infrarenal AAA in a high-risk and comparison low-risk patient population. METHODS: Conventional open surgical repair of nonruptured infrarenal AAA was performed in 572 consecutive patients from 1990 to 2000. Patients were considered at high risk if they had one or more of the following criteria: age 80 years or more, creatinine level 3.0 mg/dL or higher, severe pulmonary insufficiency, severe cardiac dysfunction, or hepatic failure. A retrospective review was carried out to determine relative risks, perioperative morbidity and mortality, and long-term survival. A P value of less than.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-eight of the study patients (22%) were at high risk and 444 were at low risk. Patients at high risk were older (77 versus 69 years; P <.001), were more likely female (26% versus 16%; P <.009), and had larger (mean, 5.9 versus 5.6 cm; P <.024), more symptomatic (20% versus 13%; P <.001) aneurysms. The 30-day operative mortality rate for the high-risk group was 4.7%, compared with 0.0% (P <.001) in the low-risk group. Overall and major morbidity rates were 29% and 14% in the high-risk cohort versus 17% (P <.003) and 5% in the low-risk cohort, respectively. The 5-year survival rate was 46% (standard deviation, 5.2%) in the high-risk group versus 74% (standard deviation, 2.6%) in the low-risk group (P <.001). On multivariate analysis, age 80 years or more (P <.046), creatinine level 3.0 mg/dL or higher (P <.022), prior stroke (P <.012), and pulmonary dysfunction were significant predictors of poor operative outcome (30-day mortality and major morbidity), and female gender (P <.035), cardiac dysfunction (P <.004), creatinine level 3.0 mg/dL or higher (P <.0001), prior stroke (P <.005), and pulmonary dysfunction (P <.0001) negatively impacted long-term survival rates. CONCLUSION: This study shows that open repair of infrarenal AAA in patients at high risk can be performed with relative safety and with results that offer a benchmark with which endovascular repair can be compared. Poor long-term survival in this population, however, highlights the importance of patient selection and raises the question of whether repair of many patients at high risk is warranted.     

Value of the Glasgow Aneurysm Score in predicting the immediate and long-term outcome after elective open repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the value of the Glasgow Aneurysm Score in predicting the immediate and long-term outcome after elective open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS: Some 403 patients underwent elective open repair of an infrarenal AAA and were classified retrospectively according to the criteria of the Glasgow Aneurysm Score (risk score = (age in years) + (7 for myocardial disease) + (10 for cerebrovascular disease) + (14 for renal disease)). RESULTS: Fourteen patients (3.5 per cent) died after operation, 23 (5.7 per cent) had a myocardial infarction and six (1.5 per cent) had a stroke. One hundred and nine patients (27.0 per cent) experienced severe postoperative complications. The Glasgow Aneurysm Score was predictive of postoperative death (area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC) 0.80, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0.71 to 0.90), severe postoperative complications (AUC 0.67, 95 per cent c.i. 0.61 to 0.73), myocardial infarction (AUC 0.72, 95 per cent c.i. 0.62 to 0.82), myocardial infarction-related postoperative death (AUC 0.78, 95 per cent c.i. 0.63 to 0.94) and stroke (AUC 0.84, 95 per cent c.i. 0.74 to 0.95). Univariate analysis showed that this risk index was also predictive of long-term survival. CONCLUSION: The Glasgow Aneurysm Score is a good predictor of outcome after elective open repair of AAA. Its simplicity and accuracy make it useful for preoperative risk stratification.     

The role of coronary artery disease in complications of abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after elective surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the extent of CAD observed in coronary angiograms (more than 50% stenosis) and the frequency of postoperative myocardial ischemic complications in a consecutive series of 84 patients who underwent elective AAA repair. Ninety-four percent of the patients with clinical evidence of CAD had significant disease as observed in coronary angiograms and eight patients had left main CAD. Seventy-two patients underwent AAA repair with a mortality rate of 1.4%; five patients had preliminary myocardial revascularization, and AAA surgery was not recommended for four patients because of severe cardiac disease. Postoperative myocardial ischemic complications occurred in 13.4% of the patients who had undergone surgery--almost exclusively in patients with clinical evidence of CAD. Both myocardial ischemia and preoperative intervention were more frequent in patients with double- or triple-vessel disease than in patients with less extensive disease. Patients with symptoms and with double- or triple-vessel CAD have a high risk of developing myocardial ischemia after AAA surgery. Preliminary myocardial revascularization may be beneficial in this group of patients.