The needs of parents of pediatric oncology patients during the palliative care phase

The death of a child is considered one of the greatest stresses a parent can experience. It has been suggested that death from childhood malignancies is more stressful for parents than death due to other chronic diseases. The purpose of this qualitative study is to identify parents' perceptions of their needs while their child was dying of cancer. Twelve parents of eight children, who died of various types of cancer 1 to 3 years ago, were interviewed by the primary investigator. These children died either in hospital or at home. Interviews were tape recorded, transcribed and analyzed by the investigators. Three needs were identified: (1) The need to have the child recognized as special while retaining as much normality within the child's and family's lives as possible; (2) The need for caring and connectedness with health care professionals; and (3) The need to retain responsiblity of parenting their dying child. Findings suggest that parental needs are similar regardles of where the death occurred. Implications for nursing practice and areas for further research were identified.     

The use of complementary and alternative medicine among pediatric patients

The overall objective of this research was to obtain information through the use of open-ended interviews, about the diagnosis and treatment of children who had cancer. The interviews, completed with 29 parents whose children had been diagnosed with cancer within the previous 5-year period, were designed to allow mothers and fathers to share their experiences about childhood cancer. From this process, many salient issues were identified by the interviewed parents, one of these issues being that of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among children being treated for cancer. Analysis of the CAM theme resulted in the identification of the following subthemes: (1) parents' opposition to CAM utilization; (2) parents' support of CAM use with their children with cancer; and (3) physicians' views of CAM as perceived by parents. Implications for the use or nonuse of CAM among pediatric populations will be discussed.     

Complementary and alternative medicine in pediatric oncology

OBJECTIVES: To summarize research in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies used for children with cancer and to explore issues and directions for measuring outcomes of CAM therapies in children. DATA SOURCES: Scientific and research articles, internet for active research studies. CONCLUSION: CAM is increasingly used as adjunctive cancer therapies in pediatrics. Mind-body and touch therapies have the greatest evidencefor effectiveness in reducing psychological and physical stressors. Supplements and herbal therapies receive the greatest interest, however, and more research is needed to determine efficacy in improving symptoms or outcomes in children with cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Mind-body and touch therapies can be used by nurses to reduce symptoms and anxiety in children. Potential risks and benefits should be determined for therapies that have no evidence.     

Complementary and alternative medicine in pediatric oncology.

Children with cancer and their families use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) to reduce symptoms, cope with life-threatening illness, and improve overall well-being. Despite numerous published surveys on the use of CAM in pediatric oncology, few studies have tested CAM therapies for safety and efficacy. A growing body of literature in adult oncology provides evidence for the role of CAM to help manage symptoms and reduce distress. Translating this research to children requires studies with new models that address family roles and include measurement of outcomes relevant to children's developmental stages and unique responses. One of the limitations in pediatrics is the small samples available to single institutions. Conducting clinical trials through the cooperative group mechanism is one way of obtaining sufficient sample sizes to determine effectiveness and safety of CAM therapies. This article summarizes research to date and describes a beginning approach to measuring outcomes of supportive CAM therapies in children with cancer.     

Use of complementary and alternative medicine among Dominican emergency department patients

This small, pilot study examined presenting complaint, brief health history, use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), and sociodemographic characteristics, among patients attending the emergency department (ED) of a large urban hospital. The sample (n = 50) was primarily Dominican and of low socioeconomic status. Almost half had used CAM for their presenting complaint or another health problem during the past year, most commonly in the form of medicinal plants made into herbal teas. CAM users were more likely to be female, longer-term residents of the United States, and to have also used religious practices for health problems. Subjects who had used CAM for any problem other than the presenting complaint during the past year rated its effectiveness higher than subjects who had used CAM for their presenting complaint. In conclusion, it is likely that a significant proportion of Dominican ED patients use CAM, suggesting that they should be asked about their CAM use during triage.     

Complementary and alternative medicine use in pediatric oncology patients in eastern Turkey

The use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) among children with cancer is becoming increasingly popular. Therefore, it is important to gain insight into the prevalence and factors related to the use of CAM. This study presents findings from a study of parents of 88 children with cancer who were receiving or had received conventional therapy for treatment of childhood cancer at a pediatric oncology unit in eastern Turkey. The findings indicated that 48.9% of the respondents reported the use of 1 or more CAM therapies. The most commonly used modality was herbal products such as herbal tea and herbal meal, mostly stinging nettle (Urtica dioica). The findings of this study indicate that CAM users were children who were an average of 3 years older than nonuser children and that CAM use was more prevalent among the children who had been diagnosed with cancer for a longer time than nonusers. There were no significant difference between users and nonusers regarding sociodemographic characteristics (such as age education level, economic status), hopelessness score of parents, gender of child, and treatment status. Healthcare providers should remain informed about the benefits and adverse effects of complementary and alternative therapies to discuss treatment options with patients and their families and to monitor treatment efficacy.     

(Using) complementary and alternative medicine: the perceptions of palliative patients with cancer

Use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is increasingly common within Western societies, including Australia. This parallels calls for or claims of integration of CAM into mainstream medical practice, with oncology and palliative care specifically nominated as appropriate arenas for integration. However, there is an absence of studies examining patient perceptions of both CAM and CAM users. In this study, 28 adult patients with cancer close to death were interviewed regarding treatment decisions at the end of life, including decisions about CAM. Thematic analysis of transcribed interviews found consistent differences in talk around CAM between 12 users and 16 nonusers of CAM, primarily related to the perceived value of these treatments. Drawing upon a mind-body discourse that holds individuals responsible for their health, users valued CAM for the perceived benefit to physical or psychological well-being and compatibility with a holistic approach to health care, deemed to complement or augment conventional medicine. However, some were self-critical of their failure to continue with CAM, despite practical and financial difficulties experienced. Nonusers devalued CAM as unable to cure their disease (but did not similarly devalue conventional medicine), and negatively construed CAM users as desperate, or as challenging medical wisdom. Despite increased legitimation and medicalization of CAM, patients assess CAM differently to allopathic medicine, with different (positive and negative) assessments attributable to users. The misperception by many (nonusers) that CAM are intended to cure and available negative moral and social judgments centred around CAM use may deter patient uptake of CAM in areas where they have proven efficacy in symptom control.     

Complementary and alternative medicine use in pediatric cancer reported during palliative phase of disease

Purpose  

The objectives of this study were to assess the frequency, types, and potential determinants of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use, and consideration of CAM use, collected from parents with children during the palliative phase of disease.     

Use of complementary and alternative medicines by surgical patients

This study examined the frequency of surgical patient use of complementary and alternative medicines prior to surgery. After conducting a literature review on the known effects of alternative medicines, we evaluated their potential interactions with anesthetics. At the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colo, we surveyed 500 elective surgical outpatients about alternative medicines taken during the 2 weeks prior to surgery. Of the 500 patients surveyed, 51% preoperatively took herbs, vitamins, dietary supplements, or homeopathic medicines (range, 1-22 per patient). Substances from 2 or more categories of alternative medicines (herbs, vitamins, dietary supplements, or homeopathic medicines) were consumed by 24% of patients. Twenty-four percent of surveyed patients consumed 50 different herbs, 41% took 9 types of vitamins, 44% took 31 types of dietary supplements, and 1% of patients took the homeopathic arnica. Classification by potential adverse effects revealed that 27% of surgical patients consumed alternative medicines that may inhibit coagulation, affect blood pressure (12%), cause sedation (9%), have cardiac effects (5%), or alter electrolytes (4%). Greater communication, knowledge, and scientific research are needed to safely integrate complementary and alternative medicines in the future management of the surgical patient.     

Attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine amongst oncology professionals in Brazil

Complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) are popular amongst cancer patients in the Brazilian context, however little is known about oncology health professionals’ attitudes toward the role of CAM and their perspectives on the potential for integration into oncological care. In this study, drawing on a series of interviews with oncology professionals (i.e. doctors, nurses, nutritionists, pharmacologists and psychologists), we provide insight into their views on the rise, validity, and role of CAM in cancer care. The results reveal two key dynamics in relation to CAM in cancer care in Brazil. First, that doctors, nurses and other allied professionals hold considerably different views on the value and place of CAM, and in turn ascribe it varying levels of legitimacy potentially limiting integration. Second, that while some health professionals may articulate a degree of support for CAM, this is limited by perceptions of CAM as lacking efficacy and intruding on their respective jurisdictional claims. Further research is needed in the Brazilian context to explore patient and professional perspectives on experiences on CAM in cancer care, including how oncology professionals’ varying positions on CAM may influence what patients are prepared to use, or discuss, in the context of cancer care.     

Survey of complementary and alternative medicine in pediatric inpatient settings

ObjectivesWhile use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is common in children, we know little about its use for hospitalized children. This survey measured the rate of CAM use, specific modalities used, and policies related to CAM use for hospitalized children.DesignAnonymous survey of hospitals in the Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings (PRĪS) networkSettingHospitals in the PRĪS network.Main outcome measuresRate of overall and specific CAM modality use, including whether these modalities are provided, permitted, or prohibited, and presence of a written policy on CAM use.ResultsOf 99 sites queried, 22 responded. Of these, 82% of sites reported some CAM presence, and 63% reported official provision of CAM therapies. Freestanding children’s hospitals provided more modalities than other types of hospitals. There was no difference in number of modalities by geographic location. The most commonly provided CAM modalities were massage and biofield therapies. The most commonly prohibited modalities were inpatient placebos outside of research settings, medical marijuana, and inpatient homeopathic preparations. Only one site reported having a written policy on CAM use.ConclusionsAmong responding institutions, the most reported some CAM presence with a wide variety of CAM modalities provided and permitted. Written institutional policies on CAM were rare.     

The use of complementary and alternative medicine by asthma patients

BACKGROUND: Use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) by asthmatic patients is increasing. Data on the prevalence of CAM use in asthma are limited, and the motivation for patients to seek CAM therapy is uncertain. AIM: To determine the prevalence and pattern of use of complementary therapies in adults treated for asthma in primary care in Singapore, and the demographic and clinical factors associated with their use. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Five primary care clinics in Singapore. METHODS: Adult patients with asthma (n = 802) received a structured questionnaire interview and clinical assessment that included demographic and clinical variables (clinical status, patient's knowledge, self-care and healthcare-seeking behaviour, and spirometric measurements) and detailed information on CAM use in the past one year. RESULTS: CAM use in the past year was reported by 27.2%, including animal food products (12.3%), herbs (10.3%), herbal-based proprietary medicines (3.2%), and acupuncture or reflexology (1%). The use of CAM was significantly associated with Chinese ethnicity, longer disease duration, moderate and severe persistent asthma, FEV(1)/FVC < 80%, lack of positive response to treatment in the past year, higher patient knowledge score, and multiple sources of care providers. DISCUSSION: The use of CAM is highly prevalent in Asian patients treated for asthma in primary care, and is associated with cultural and clinical factors reflecting a need to improve care.     

Use of complementary and alternative medicine in HIV-infected subjects

OBJECTIVES: To compare the characteristics of HIV-infected subjects who had ever used with those who had never used Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM). DESIGN: The European Level Epidemiology of Complementary Therapies in HIV project (ELECTHIV 2), a case-control study, was conducted in seven European countries. All HIV-infected subjects who consecutively attended the offices of the collaborating organizations were eligible for this study. Information was obtained from self-administered, anonymous questionnaires. SETTING: A total of 1066 subjects entered the study: 632 were CAM users and 434 had never used CAM. RESULTS: CAM use was more common among females than males (odds ratio (OR) 1.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-2.2) and in more educated subjects. CAM use was less common among subjects taking highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.3-0.8), but was more common in outpatients who reported HAART-related side effects (specifically neuropathy). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that CAM use in HIV-infected subjects is related to female gender, higher levels of education and longer duration of HIV infection.     

Pain management in palliative care oncology patients

Palliative care is an interdisciplinary approach to relieving aversive symptoms in people with life-threatening illnesses; it aims to improve the lives of patients and their loved ones, the “patient-family unit.” Palliative care should occur in parallel with all other medical interventions. Indeed, good symptom management is important in helping patients cope with the unpleasantness associated with potentially curative or life-prolonging interventions; it is absolutely essential near the end of life. Unrelieved pain is the symptom that people fear the most. In most cases, adequate pain relief can be achieved with systemic medications alone. When systemic medications fail, due to inadequate analgesia or burdensome side effects, invasive techniques may complement, or replace, systemic therapy. Using a case-based format, we illustrate some complex issues that clinicians face and offer strategies to improve the lives of oncology patients with pain.     

Use of complementary and alternative medicine in patients suffering from primary headache disorders

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is increasingly common in the treatment of primary headache disorders despite lack of evidence for efficacy in most modalities. A systematic questionnaire-based survey of CAM therapy was conducted in 432 patients who attended seven tertiary headache out-patient clinics in Germany and Austria. Use of CAM was reported by the majority (81.7%) of patients. Most frequently used CAM treatments were acupuncture (58.3%), massage (46.1%) and relaxation techniques (42.4%). Use was motivated by 'to leave nothing undone' (63.7%) and 'to be active against the disease' (55.6%). Compared with non-users, CAM users were of higher age, showed a longer duration of disease, a higher percentage of chronification, less intensity of headache, were more satisfied with conventional prophylaxis and showed greater willingness to gather information about headaches. There were no differences with respect to gender, headache diagnoses, headache-specific disability, education, income, religious attitudes or satisfaction with conventional attack therapy. A higher number of headache days, longer duration of headache treatment, higher personal costs, and use of CAM for other diseases predicted a higher number of used CAM treatments. This study confirms that CAM is widely used among primary headache patients, mostly in combination with standard care.