Noncontrast 3D steady state free precession magnetic resonance angiography of the thoracic central veins using nonselective radiofrequency excitation over a large field of view: initial experience

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of three-dimensional (3D) steady state free precession (SSFP) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) using nonselective radiofrequency excitation for the assessment of thoracic central veins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients (17 males, 13 females, age range 22-76) with various cardiac and thoracic vascular diseases underwent free-breathing electrocardiogram-gated noncontrast SSFP MRA and conventional high-resolution 3D contrast-enhanced (CE) MRA of the thorax at 1.5 T. Two readers evaluated both datasets for findings: venous visibility and sharpness (from 0, not visualized to 3, excellent definition); artifacts; signal-to-noise ratio (SNR); and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in 8 venous segments including superior vena cava (SVC), supra-diaphragmatic inferior vena cava, bilateral brachiocephalic, proximal subclavian, and lower internal jugular veins. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon test for overall image quality and vessel visibility, t test for SNR and CNR analysis, and kappa coefficient for inter-observer variability. RESULTS: 3D SSFP and CE-MRA were successfully performed in all patients. Scan time for SSFP MRA ranged from 5 to 10 minutes (mean +/- standard deviation, 7 +/- 2 minutes). Reader 1 (2) graded the overall image quality as excellent and good on SSFP MRA in 23 (25) and 7 (5) patients, and on CE-MRA in 22 (23) and 8 (9) patients, respectively. On SSFP MRA, readers 1 and 2 graded 234 (97.5%) and 233 (97.1%) venous segments with diagnostic definition (grades 2 and 3) (kappa = 0.69), respectively. On conventional CE-MRA, readers 1 and 2 graded 231 (96.3%) and 232 (96.7%) venous segments with diagnostic definition (grades 2 and 3) (kappa = 0.68), respectively. Segmental visibility and sharpness were higher for lower internal jugular veins on CE-MRA for each reader (P < 0.001). No significant difference existed for venous visibility and sharpness scores for other venous segments between the 2 techniques for both readers (P > 0.05). SNR and CNR values were lower for internal jugular veins on SSFP MRA (P < 0.001). No significant difference existed between SNR and CNR values for the other venous segments on SSFP and CE-MRA (P > 0.05 for all). The 2 readers demonstrated patent SVC Glenn shunt to main pulmonary artery (n = 3), patent extra cardiac Fontan shunt from inferior vena cava to pulmonary artery confluence (n = 2), and dilatation and thrombosis of SVC (n = 1) and right brachiocephalic vein (n = 1) on both datasets. CONCLUSION: Free breathing navigator-gated noncontrast 3D SSFP MRA with nonselective radiofrequency excitation provides high image quality and sufficient SNR and CNR for confident evaluation of thoracic central veins.     

Free-breathing 3D steady-state free precession coronary magnetic resonance angiography: comparison of diaphragm and cardiac fat navigators

PURPOSE: To compare the performance of the conventional diaphragm navigator (DNAV) and the recently developed cardiac fat navigator (FatNAV) in suppressing respiration-induced cardiac motion in free-breathing 3D balanced steady-state free precession coronary MRA (SSFP CMRA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 16 healthy volunteers the right coronary artery (RCA) was imaged at 1.5T using a navigator-gated 3D SSFP CMRA sequence. DNAV and FatNAV gating were performed in random order. Image quality difference was scored by three experienced readers blinded to the gating technique. Blood signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), blood-to-myocardium contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and navigator efficiency were calculated. RESULTS: Diagnostically interpretable CMRA was obtained successfully in all 16 subjects with FatNAV gating (0% failure rate) and only 14 subjects with DNAV gating (12% failure rate). Compared to DNAV gating, FatNAV gating provided similar SNR and CNR, better image quality (P < 0.01), and 28% improvement in navigator efficiency (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: FatNAV gating provides more effective motion suppression and better image quality than DNAV gating for free-breathing 3D SSFP CMRA of the RCA in healthy subjects.     

Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession for improved catheter-directed coronary magnetic resonance angiography

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility of three-dimensional thick-partition, contrast-enhanced, catheter-directed coronary artery magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and test the hypothesis that three-dimensional imaging improves coronary artery background contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) compared to two-dimensional imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Catheters were advanced into the coronary arteries of swine (N = 6) under MR guidance. Three-dimensional coronary MRA was performed after intracoronary injection of a small dose of contrast media using magnetization-prepared steady-state free precession (SSFP) with two thick partitions. For comparison, two magnetization-prepared two-dimensional SSFP scans were also performed, one with no signal averaging and one with two signal averages. All sequences had the same coverage and in-plane spatial resolution. RESULTS: The coronary artery was successfully catheterized in all (6/6) animals. CNR for three-dimensional imaging was 11.1 +/- 1.2 for proximal arterial segments and 4.3 +/- 0.4 for distal segments. Without averaging, two-dimensional imaging CNRs for proximal and distal segments were 5.0 +/- 0.7 and 1.2 +/- 0.2, respectively. With averaging, two-dimensional imaging CNRs for proximal and distal segments were 9.4 +/- 1.5 and 2.9 +/- 0.4, respectively. Three-dimensional imaging showed a statistically significant increase in CNR over all two-dimensional imaging for both proximal and distal segments (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional thick-partition, contrast-enhanced, catheter-directed coronary MRA is feasible and improves CNR over two-dimensional projection imaging.     

Free-breathing, three-dimensional coronary artery magnetic resonance angiography: comparison of sequences

PURPOSE: To compare six free-breathing, three-dimensional, magnetization-prepared coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) sequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six bright-blood sequences were evaluated: Cartesian segmented gradient echo (C-SGE), radial SGE (R-SGE), spiral SGE (S-SGE), spiral gradient echo (S-GE), Cartesian steady-state free precession (C-SSFP), and radial SSFP (R-SSFP). The right coronary artery (RCA) was imaged in 10 healthy volunteers using all six sequences in randomized order. Images were evaluated by two observers with respect to signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), visible vessel length, vessel edge sharpness, and vessel diameter. RESULTS: C-SSFP depicted RCA over the longest distance with high vessel sharpness, good SNR, and excellent background suppression. S-GE provided best SNR and CNR in proximal segments, but more vessel blurring and poorer background suppression, resulting in poor visualization of distal segments. R-SSFP images showed good background suppression and best vessel sharpness, but only moderate SNR. C-SGE provided good SNR and reasonable CNR, but lowest vessel sharpness. S-SGE and R-SGE visualized the RCA over the smallest distance, mostly due to vessel blurring and low SNR, respectively. CONCLUSION: Overall, Cartesian SSFP provided the best image quality with excellent vessel sharpness, visualization of long vessel segments, and good SNR and CNR.     

3 T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of the intracranial arteries: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography

PURPOSE: We sought to prospectively evaluate the image quality and visualization of the intracranial arteries using high spatial resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) at 3 T and to perform intraindividual comparison with time-of-flight (TOF) MRA and multislice CT angiography (CTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients (5 men, 7 women, 37-71 years of age) with suspected cerebrovascular disease prospectively underwent MRA and CTA. MRA was performed on a 3 T MR system, including both 3-dimensional (3D) TOF (Voxel dimension: 0.6 x 0.5 x 0.9 mm in 5 minutes and 40 seconds) and 3D CE-MRA (voxel dimension: 0.7 x 0.7 x 0.8 mm in 20 seconds, using parallel acquisition with an acceleration factor of 4). CTA images were acquired on a 16-slice CT scanner (voxel dimension: 0.35 x 0.35 x 0.8 mm in 17 seconds). The image quality and visualization of up to 26 intracranial arterial segments in each study was evaluated by 2 experienced radiologists. The arterial diameter for selective intracranial arteries was measured independently on each of the 3 studies, and statistical analysis and comparative correlation was performed. RESULTS: A total of 312 arterial segments were examined by CE-MRA, TOF-MRA, and CTA. The majority of intracranial arteries (87%) were visualized with diagnostic image quality on CE-MRA with a significant correlation to TOF (R values = 0.84; 95% confidence interval 0.79-0.86, P < 0.0001), and to CTA (R values = 0.74; 95% confidence interavl 0.68-0.78, P < 0.001). The image quality for small intracranial arteries, including the anterior-inferior cerebellar artery, the posterior communicating artery, and the M3 branch of the middle cerebral artery, was significantly lower on CE-MRA compared with TOF and CTA (P < 0.03). There was a significant correlation for the dimensional measurements of arterial diameters at CE-MRA with TOF (r = 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.81-0.93), and CTA (r = 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.73-0.90). CONCLUSION: The described 3 T CE-MRA protocol, spanning from the cervical to the intracranial vessels, visualized and characterized the majority of intracranial arteries with image quality comparable with that obtained using TOF-MRA and CTA. Further clinical studies are required to establish the accuracy of the technique in a broader clinical setting.     

Navigator-gated coronary magnetic resonance angiography using steady-state-free-precession: comparison to standard T2-prepared gradient-echo and spiral imaging

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Recent developments of magnetic resonance imaging enabled free-breathing coronary MRA (cMRA) using steady-state-free-precession (SSFP) for endogenous contrast. The purpose of this study was a systematic comparison of SSFP cMRA with standard T2-prepared gradient-echo and spiral cMRA. METHODS: Navigator-gated free-breathing T2-prepared SSFP-, T2-prepared gradient-echo- and T2-prepared spiral cMRA was performed in 18 healthy swine (45-68 kg body-weight). Image quality was investigated subjectively and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and vessel sharpness were compared. RESULTS: SSFP cMRA allowed for high quality cMRA during free breathing with substantial improvements in SNR, CNR and vessel sharpness when compared with standard T2-prepared gradient-echo imaging. Spiral imaging demonstrated the highest SNR while image quality score and vessel definition was best for SSFP imaging. CONCLUSION: Navigator-gated free-breathing T2-prepared SSFP cMRA is a promising new imaging approach for high signal and high contrast imaging of the coronary arteries with improved vessel border definition.     

Total-body 3D magnetic resonance angiography influences the management of patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease

High-resolution total-body 3D MR angiography (MRA) has recently become available, revealing additional clinically relevant disease in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). However, the actual impact of total-body MRA on patient management in patients with PAOD has not been investigated so far. Two hundred forty-nine consecutive patients with angiographically proven PAOD were prospectively examined by means of contrast-enhanced total-body 3D MRA on a 1.5-T MR scanner. All correlative imaging studies performed within 60 days of total-body MRA were included in the efficacy analysis. Additional clinically relevant disease (luminal narrowing >50%, aneurysmal changes or dissections) was found in 73 segments (52 patients), including the renal arteries (36 segments), carotid arteries (28 segments), subclavian arteries (four segments) and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) (five segments). Of the 73 segments, 36 were deemed necessary for further investigation by means of focused MRA examinations; the diagnosis was confirmed in all cases. Within the 60-day follow-up period, interventional or surgical therapy outside the peripheral arterial tree was performed in nine patients (11 segments), including carotid endatherectomy and renal artery angioplasty. The outlined total-body 3D MRA approach permits a comprehensive evaluation of the arterial system in patients with atherosclerosis and does indeed have an impact on patient management in patients with PAOD.     

Whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3 Tesla in 5 minutes with slow infusion of Gd-BOPTA, a high-relaxivity clinical contrast agent.

T(1)-shortening contrast agents have been used to improve the depiction of coronary arteries with breath-hold magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). The spatial resolution and coverage are limited by the duration of the arterial phase of the contrast media passage. In this study we investigated the feasibility of acquiring free-breathing, whole-heart coronary MRA during slow infusion of the contrast media (0.3 ml/s) for prolonged blood signal enhancement time. Ultrashort TR (3 ms) and parallel data acquisition were used to allow the whole-heart MRA in approximately 5 min. A newly approved gadolinium (Gd)-based high T(1) relaxivity contrast agent, gadobenate dimeglumine ([Gd-BOPTA](2-)), was used and coronary MRA was performed on a whole-body 3 Tesla (T) system to improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Results from eight volunteers demonstrate that this coronary MRA method is capable of imaging the whole heart in 4.5 +/- 0.6 min. Major coronary arteries are well depicted with high SNR (42.4 +/- 12.5) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR; 27.1 +/- 7.6).     

Magnetic resonance angiography in infrapopliteal arterial disease: prospective comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the accuracy of 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3 T magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) versus digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the depiction of infrageniculate arteries in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective 1.5 T, 3 T MRA, and DSA comparison was used to evaluate 360 vessel segments in 10 patients (15 limbs) with chronic symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Selective DSA was performed within 30 days before both MRAs. The accuracy of 1.5 T and 3 T MRA was compared with DSA as the standard of reference by consensus agreement of 2 experienced readers. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and signal-difference-to-noise ratios (SDNRs) were quantified. RESULTS: No significant difference in overall image quality, sufficiency for diagnosis, depiction of arterial anatomy, motion artifacts, and venous overlap was found comparing 1.5 T with 3 T MRA (P > 0.05 by Wilcoxon signed rank and as by Cohen k test). Overall sensitivity of 1.5 and 3 T MRA for detection of significant arterial stenosis was 79% and 82%, and specificity was 87% and 87% for both modalities, respectively. Interobserver agreement was excellent k > 0.8, P < 0.05) for 1.5 T as well as for 3 T MRA. SNR and SDNR were significantly increased using the 3 T system (average increase: 36.5%, P < 0.032 by t test, and 38.5%, P < 0.037 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Despite marked improvement of SDNR, 3 T MRA does not yet provide a significantly higher accuracy in diagnostic imaging of atherosclerotic lesions below the knee joint as compared with 1.5 T MRA.     

"Soap-Bubble" visualization and quantitative analysis of 3D coronary magnetic resonance angiograms.

In order to compare coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) data obtained with different scanning methodologies, adequate visualization and presentation of the coronary MRA data need to be ensured. Furthermore, an objective quantitative comparison between images acquired with different scanning methods is desirable. To address this need, a software tool ("Soap-Bubble") that facilitates visualization and quantitative comparison of 3D volume targeted coronary MRA data was developed. In the present implementation, the user interactively specifies a curved subvolume (enclosed in the 3D coronary MRA data set) that closely encompasses the coronary arterial segments. With a 3D Delaunay triangulation and a parallel projection, this enables the simultaneous display of multiple coronary segments in one 2D representation. For objective quantitative analysis, frequently explored quantitative parameters such as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR); contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR); and vessel length, sharpness, and diameter can be assessed. The present tool supports visualization and objective, quantitative comparisons of coronary MRA data obtained with different scanning methods. The first results obtained in healthy adults and in patients with coronary artery disease are presented.     

1.0-M gadobutrol versus 0.5-M gadoterate for peripheral magnetic resonance angiography: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial

PURPOSE: To perform a quantitative and qualitative comparison of gadobutrol and gadoterate in three-station contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of the lower limbs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 52 patients with leg ischemia were randomly assigned to one of two groups receiving either gadobutrol (1.0 mmol Gd/mL, 15 mL) or gadoterate (0.5 mmol Gd/mL, 30 mL). Three-station 3D CE-MRAs from the pelvis to the ankles were performed with moving-table technique on a 1.5T MR scanner. Injection time was identical in both groups. Signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were calculated for 816 arteries. Contrast quality in 1196 vessel segments was evaluated separately by two blinded readers on a three-point scale. RESULTS: Mean SNR (61.8 +/- 7.8 for gadobutrol vs. 61.9 +/- 9.1 for gadoterate, P = 0.257), CNR (52.8 +/- 9.1 vs. 52.8 +/- 10.7, P = 0.154), and qualitative ranking (1.41 vs. 1.44, P = 0.21) for all vessels did not differ significantly between the two patient groups. The overall quality was good in 90.4% with gadoterate and 94.2% with gadobutrol (P = 0.462). CONCLUSION: High-concentration gadobutrol allows neither a higher CNR nor any qualitative advantage over the ordinary unspecific Gd agent gadoterate when the same Gd load and injection times are used in multistation CE-MRA of the peripheral arteries.     

Free-breathing renal magnetic resonance angiography with steady-state free-precession and slab-selective spin inversion combined with radial k-space sampling and water-selective excitation.

The impact of radial k-space sampling and water-selective excitation on a novel navigator-gated cardiac-triggered slab-selective inversion prepared 3D steady-state free-precession (SSFP) renal MR angiography (MRA) sequence was investigated. Renal MRA was performed on a 1.5-T MR system using three inversion prepared SSFP approaches: Cartesian (TR/TE: 5.7/2.8 ms, FA: 85 degrees), radial (TR/TE: 5.5/2.7 ms, FA: 85 degrees) SSFP, and radial SSFP combined with water-selective excitation (TR/TE: 9.9/4.9 ms, FA: 85 degrees). Radial data acquisition lead to significantly reduced motion artifacts (P < 0.05). SNR and CNR were best using Cartesian SSFP (P < 0.05). Vessel sharpness and vessel length were comparable in all sequences. The addition of a water-selective excitation could not improve image quality. In conclusion, radial k-space sampling reduces motion artifacts significantly in slab-selective inversion prepared renal MRA, while SNR and CNR are decreased. The addition of water-selective excitation could not improve the lower CNR in radial scanning.     

Whole-heart steady-state free precession coronary artery magnetic resonance angiography.

Current implementations of coronary artery magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) suffer from limited coverage of the coronary arterial system. Whole-heart coronary MRA was implemented based on a free-breathing steady-state free-precession (SSFP) technique with magnetization preparation. The technique was compared to a similar implementation of conventional, thin-slab coronary MRA in 12 normal volunteers. Three thin-slab volumes were prescribed: 1) a transverse slab, covering the left main (LM) artery and proximal segments of the left anterior ascending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCX) coronary arteries; 2) a double-oblique slab covering the right coronary artery (RCA); and 3) a double-oblique slab covering the proximal and distal segments of the LCX. The whole-heart data set was reformatted in identical orientations. Visible vessel length, vessel sharpness, and vessel diameter were determined and compared separately for each vessel. Whole-heart coronary MRA visualized LM/LAD (11.7 +/- 3.4 cm) and LCX (6.9 +/- 3.6 cm) over a significantly longer distance than the transverse volume (LM/LAD, 6.1 +/- 1.1 cm, P < 0.001; LCX, 4.2 +/- 1.2 cm, P < 0.05). Improvements in visible vessel length for RCA and LCX in the whole-heart approach vs. their respective targeted volumes were not significant. It is concluded that the whole-heart coronary MRA technique improves visible vessel length and facilitates high-quality coronary MRA of the complete coronary artery tree in a single measurement.     

Noncontrast MR angiography for comprehensive assessment of abdominopelvic arteries using quadruple inversion-recovery preconditioning and 3D balanced steady-state free precession imaging

Purpose:

To develop a noncontrast magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) method for comprehensive evaluation of abdominopelvic arteries in a single 3D acquisition.

Materials and Methods:

A noncontrast MRA (NC MRA) pulse sequence was developed using four inversion‐recovery (IR) pulses and 3D balanced steady‐state free precession (b‐SSFP) readout to provide arterial imaging from renal to external iliac arteries. Respiratory triggered, high spatial resolution (1.3 × 1.3 × 1.7 mm³) noncontrast angiograms were obtained in seven volunteers and ten patients referred for gadolinium‐enhanced MRA (CE MRA). Images were assessed for diagnostic quality by two radiologists. Quantitative measurements of arterial signal contrast were also performed.

Results:

NC MRA imaging was successfully completed in all subjects in 7.0 ± 2.3 minutes. In controls, image quality of NC MRA averaged 2.79 ± 0.39 on a scale of 0–3, where 3 is maximum. Image quality of NC MRA (2.65 ± 0.41) was comparable to that of CE MRA (2.9 ± 0.32) in all patients. Contrast ratio measurements in patients demonstrated that NC MRA provides arterial contrast comparable to source CE MRA images with adequate venous and excellent background tissue suppression.

Conclusion:

The proposed noncontrast MRA pulse sequence provides high‐quality visualization of abdominopelvic arteries within clinically feasible scan times. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2011;33:1430–1439. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Intraindividual comparison of gadopentetate dimeglumine,gadobenate dimeglumine,and gadobutrol for pelvic 3D magnetic resonance angiography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect on image quality of a 1.0 mol/L gadolinium chelate with that of two 0.5 mol/L gadolinium compounds. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five healthy volunteers underwent a mono-station 3D MRA exam (Siemens SONATA, Erlangen, Germany) four times using four separate gadolinium preparations. All subjects first received a fixed volume of undiluted gadobutrol (1 mol/L), which corresponded to a dose between 0.1 and 0.15 mmol/kg body weight. This gadobutrol dosage was then diluted with saline into twice the volume and administered as a bolus at twice the injection rate. For Gd-DTPA and Gd BOPTA, because these contrast agents are 0.5 mol/L preparations, the volume and flow rate were doubled to match diluted gadobutrol volume and concentration. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the angiographic data sets was performed on nine arterial segments. RESULTS: Image quality was rated diagnostic for all image data sets without statistically significant differences between any of the compounds (P > 0.3). Quantitative measurements of Gd BOPTA (SNR: 81.15; CNR: 68.91) and both standard and diluted forms of gadobutrol (SNR: 84.33; CNR: 71.62; SNR(diluted): 79,23; CNR(diluted): 66.26) yielded significantly higher results (P < 0.02) in comparison with Gd-DTPA (SNR: 49.55; CNR: 38.24). The difference between either form of gadobutrol and Gd BOPTA was not shown to be statistically significant (P > 0.3), whereas both the SNR and CNR of standard gadobutrol were significantly higher than diluted gadobutrol. CONCLUSION: Gadobutrol- and Gd BOPTA-MRA exams lead to improved delineation of the pelvic arterial morphology compared with MRA exams performed with Gd-DTPA.     

Low-dose, time-resolved, contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography in cardiac and vascular diseases: correlation to high spatial resolution 3D contrast-enhanced MRA

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of low-dose, contrast-enhanced, time-resolved, three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography (TR-MRA) in the assessment of various cardiac and vascular diseases, and to compare the results with high-resolution contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients underwent contrast-enhanced 3D TR-MRA and high spatial resolution 3D CE-MRA for evaluation of cardiac and thoracic vascular diseases at 1.5 T, and neurovascular, abdominal and peripheral vascular diseases at 3T. Gadolinium-based contrast medium was administered at a constant dose of 5 ml for TR-MRA, and 20 ml (lower extremity 30 ml) for CE-MRA. Two readers evaluated image quality using a four-point scale (from 0=excellent to 3=non-diagnostic), artefacts and findings on both datasets. Interobserver variability was tested with kappa coefficient. RESULTS: The overall image quality for TR-MRA was in the diagnostic range (median 0, range 0-1; k=0.74). Readers demonstrated important additional dynamic information on TR-MRA in 28 of 30 patients (k=0.84). Confident evaluation of organ perfusion (n=23), arteriovenous malformation/fistula flow patterns (n=7), exclusion of intra-cardiac shunts (n=6), and assessment of stent and conduit patency (n=5) were performed by both readers using TR-MRA. Readers demonstrated fine vascular details with higher confidence in 10 patients on CE-MRA. Using CE-MRA, Reader 1 and 2 depicted anatomical details in 6 and 5 patients, respectively, only on CE-MRA. CONCLUSION: Low-dose TR-MRA yields rapid and important functional and anatomical information in patients with cardiac and vascular diseases. Due to limited spatial resolution, TR-MRA is inferior to CE-MRA in demonstrating fine vascular details.     

Value of subtraction in fat-saturated three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the hemodialysis fistula

Purpose: To evaluate image subtraction in a three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (3D CE-MRA) using fat suppression for the hemodialysis fistula.

Material and Methods: Fifteen patients suffering from hemodialysis fistula dysfunction were imaged with 3D CE-MRA using fat suppression and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Non-subtracted and subtracted MRA images using maximum intensity projection (MIP) were constructed and the validity of the MRA interpretations of the degree of vascular stenoses was evaluated using DSA as the standard of reference. Image quality was assessed using qualitative analysis (vessel contrast) and quantitative analysis (contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the vessel versus the background).

Results: In the vessels with stenosis of 50% or greater, the sensitivity and specificity of the non-subtracted MRA were 89.5% and 81.8%, respectively, and of the subtracted MRA 89.5% and 86.4%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the detectability of stenoses between either MRA. The vessel contrast of the anterior interosseous artery and the CNR of the anterior interosseous artery versus the background on the subtracted MRA were significantly superior to those on the non-subtracted MRA. With regard to the radial artery and cephalic vein, there was no significant difference in the vessel contrast and CNR between either MRA.

Conclusion: Both subtracted and non-subtracted MRA techniques are useful in detecting hemodialysis fistula dysfunction.     

Three-dimensional breathhold SSFP coronary MRA: a comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of three-dimensional breathhold coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 3.0T using the steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequence, and quantify the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) gains of coronary MRA from 1.5T to 3.0T using whole-body and phased-array cardiac coils as the signal receiver. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight healthy volunteers were scanned on 1.5T and 3.0T whole-body systems using the SSFP sequence. Numerical simulations were performed for the SSFP sequence to optimize the flip angle and predict signal enhancement from 1.5T to 3.0T. Coronary artery images were acquired with the whole-body coil in transmit-receive mode or transmit-only with phased-array cardiac coil receivers. RESULTS: In vivo studies of the same volunteer group at both field strengths showed increases of 87% in SNR and 83% in CNR from 1.5T to 3.0T using a whole-body coil as the signal receiver. The corresponding increases using phased-array receivers were 53% in SNR and 92% in CNR. However, image quality at 3.0T was more variable than 1.5T, with increased susceptibility artifacts and local brightening as the result of increased B(0) and B(1) inhomogeneities. CONCLUSION: Coronary MRA at 3.0T using a three-dimensional breathhold SSFP sequence is feasible. Improved SNR at 3.0T warrants the use of coronary MRA with faster acquisition and/or improved spatial resolution. Further investigations are required to improve the consistency of image quality and signal uniformity at 3.0T.     

Gadofosveset trisodium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the left atrium—A feasibility study

Aim

Imaging of the left atrium is regularly performed prior to pulmonary vein isolation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of contrast-enhanced high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the left atrium using the blood-pool contrast agent gadofosveset trisodium in comparison to noncontrast MRA.

Materials and methods

Twenty consecutive patients were examined by free-breathing electrocardiogram-gated whole-heart MRA (reconstructed spatial resolution, 0.7 mm × 0.6 mm × 0.8 mm) with a noncontrast T2-prepared steady state free precession sequence (T2-prep SSFP) and a gadofosveset trisodium-enhanced inversion-recovery SSFP sequence (CE IR-SSFP). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of blood in the left atrium was determined. Depiction of the left atrium was rated by two radiologists in consensus. A cardiologist segmented the MR data sets and rated depiction of the left atrium.

Results

Five of 20 patients had irregular breathing patterns with navigator efficiency less than 35% and were excluded from evaluation. CNR was significantly higher for CE IR-SSFP compared with T2-prep SSFP (18.4 ± 5.3 vs. 11.7 ± 3.5, p < 0.01). Depiction of the left atrium by T2-prep SSFP was rated as good in four patients, moderate in ten patients, and poor in one patient, whereas depiction of the left atrium by CE IR-SSFP was rated as excellent in nine patients, good in four patients, and moderate in two patients. CE IR-SSFP allowed for semiautomated segmentation of the left atrium in 15 patients, whereas T2-prep SSFP allowed for segmentation only in ten patients.

Conclusion

Gadofosveset trisodium-enhanced MRA of the left atrium is feasible with significantly improved image quality compared to noncontrast MRA.     

Coronary magnetic resonance angiography

Coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is a powerful noninvasive technique with high soft-tissue contrast for the visualization of the coronary anatomy without X-ray exposure. Due to the small dimensions and tortuous nature of the coronary arteries, a high spatial resolution and sufficient volumetric coverage have to be obtained. However, this necessitates scanning times that are typically much longer than one cardiac cycle. By collecting image data during multiple RR intervals, one can successfully acquire coronary MR angiograms. However, constant cardiac contraction and relaxation, as well as respiratory motion, adversely affect image quality. Therefore, sophisticated motion-compensation strategies are needed. Furthermore, a high contrast between the coronary arteries and the surrounding tissue is mandatory. In the present article, challenges and solutions of coronary imaging are discussed, and results obtained in both healthy and diseased states are reviewed. This includes preliminary data obtained with state-of-the-art techniques such as steady-state free precession (SSFP), whole-heart imaging, intravascular contrast agents, coronary vessel wall imaging, and high-field imaging. Simultaneously, the utility of electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for the visualization of the coronary arteries is discussed.