Increased Reading Speed for Stories Presented during General Anesthesia

Background: In the absence of explicit memories such as the recall and recognition of intraoperative events, memory of auditory information played during general anesthesia has been demonstrated with several tests of implicit memory. In contrast to explicit memory, which requires conscious recollection, implicit memory does not require recollection of previous experiences and is evidenced by a priming effect on task performance. The authors evaluated the effect of a standardized anesthetic technique on implicit memory, first using a word stem completion task, and then a reading speed task in a subsequent study.

Methods: While undergoing lumbar disc surgery, 60 patients were exposed to auditory materials via headphones in two successive experiments. A balanced intravenous technique with propofol and alfentanil infusions and a nitrous oxide-oxygen mixture was used to maintain adequate anesthesia. In the first experiment, 30 patients were exposed randomly to one of the two lists of 34 repeated German nouns; in the second experiment, 30 patients were exposed to one of two tapes containing two short stories. Thirty control patients for each experiment heard the tapes without receiving anesthesia. All patients were tested for implicit memory 6-8 h later: A word stem completion task for the words and a reading speed task for the stories were used as measures of implicit memory.

Results: The control group completed the word stems significantly more often with the words that they had heard previously, but no such effect was found in the anesthetized group. However, both the control and patient groups showed a decreased reading time of about 40 ms per word for the previously presented stories compared with the new stories. The patients had no explicit memory of intraoperative events.     

Increased reading speed for stories presented during general anesthesia

BACKGROUND: In the absence of explicit memories such as the recall and recognition of intraoperative events, memory of auditory information played during general anesthesia has been demonstrated with several tests of implicit memory. In contrast to explicit memory, which requires conscious recollection, implicit memory does not require recollection of previous experiences and is evidenced by a priming effect on task performance. The authors evaluated the effect of a standardized anesthetic technique on implicit memory, first using a word stem completion task, and then a reading speed task in a subsequent study. METHODS: While undergoing lumbar disc surgery, 60 patients were exposed to auditory materials via headphones in two successive experiments. A balanced intravenous technique with propofol and alfentanil infusions and a nitrous oxide-oxygen mixture was used to maintain adequate anesthesia. In the first experiment, 30 patients were exposed randomly to one of the two lists of 34 repeated German nouns; in the second experiment, 30 patients were exposed to one of two tapes containing two short stories. Thirty control patients for each experiment heard the tapes without receiving anesthesia. All patients were tested for implicit memory 6-8 h later: A word stem completion task for the words and a reading speed task for the stories were used as measures of implicit memory. RESULTS: The control group completed the word stems significantly more often with the words that they had heard previously, but no such effect was found in the anesthetized group. However, both the control and patient groups showed a decreased reading time of about 40 ms per word for the previously presented stories compared with the new stories. The patients had no explicit memory of intraoperative events. CONCLUSIONS: Implicit memory was demonstrated after anesthesia by the reading speed task but not by the word stem completion task. Some methodologic aspects, such as using low frequency words or varying study and test modalities, may account for the negative results of the word stem completion task. Another explanation is that anesthesia with propofol, alfentanil, and nitrous oxide suppressed the word priming but not the reading speed measure of implicit memory. The reading speed paradigm seems to provide a stable and reliable measurement of implicit memory.     

No implicit memory for stories played during isoflurane/alfentanil/nitrous oxide anesthesia: a reading speed measurement

Implicit memory of intraoperatively presented stories was recently detected by using the reading speed paradigm during propofol-alfentanil-nitrous oxide anesthesia. Our main goal was to evaluate the reading speed test procedure under another anesthetic regimen, i.e., isoflurane combined with nitrous oxide and alfentanil-infusion. In both experiments, patients were premedicated with oral midazolam. In a previous experiment, patients postoperatively read "old" stories that had been presented during anesthesia quicker compared with "new," unpresented stories. The same study design and test material as in the previous experiment were used. One of two audio tapes with two short stories was played randomly to patients during lumbar disk surgery and to awake controls. Approximately 7 h later, a structured interview and the reading speed test were used to determine whether the participants had any explicit or implicit memories of the presented stories. The results of 30 patients and 30 controls were calculated. Whereas the control participants showed an intact explicit and implicit memory of the previously presented material, no such effect was found in the anesthetized patients. The present experiment shows that changing the main anesthetic in otherwise equal study conditions, i. e., propofol to isoflurane (end-expiratory 0.7%), implicit memory is abolished in anesthetized patients. IMPLICATIONS: We showed that implicit memory during general anesthesia can be abolished by changing the hypnotic anesthetic. Increased postoperative reading speed for stories presented during propofol-alfentanil-nitrous oxide anesthesia was shown in a previous experiment, but not in our study using isoflurane for balanced anesthesia.     

Implicit memory varies as a function of hypnotic electroencephalogram stage in surgical patients

Previous studies have observed a correlation of implicit memory with certain electroencephalogram (EEG) measures during anesthesia. Here, we tested the relationship between hypnotic depth determined by computer system (Narcotrend(TM)) and implicit memory in anesthetized patients, assessed by a postoperative reading speed test. Thirty-two patients undergoing laparoscopic herniotomy and 30 age-matched volunteer controls were included the study. All patients received IV midazolam 2-3 mg followed by an induction dose of propofol and remifentanil. The anesthesia was maintained with propofol and remifentanil infusions and cisatracurium. Each patient was exposed to 2 of 4 stories, repeated 6 times. The first story was presented during light to moderate hypnotic EEG stages, and the second story was presented during deep hypnosis. Presentation of stories was balanced between patients and hypnotic stages. The controls listened to the two stories without receiving anesthesia. The reading speed for the previously presented stories and two new stories was measured approximately 7 h later with a computer program. No signs of inadequate anesthesia were observed, and no explicit memories of intraoperative events were revealed by a structured interview. No change of reading speed was observed for words presented during deep hypnotic stages. In contrast, an increased reading speed of 20 ms per word was found for content words (i.e., nouns, verbs, and adjectives), but not for function words (conjunctions, prepositions, and so on), presented during light to moderate hypnotic stages. Increased reading speed for semantically rich content words indicates that anesthetized patients are able to process acoustic information during light and moderate, but not deep, hypnosis. IMPLICATIONS: In this study, implicit memory was observed during general anesthesia at light to moderate, but not deep, hypnotic stages. Hypnotic stages were determined by a commercial electroencephalogram device, and implicit memory was measured by using a postoperative reading speed task. During lighter phases of anesthesia, patients should be protected against acoustic information that could negatively influence their postoperative outcome.     

Is there implicit memory after propofol sedation?

Recent evidence indicates that implicit memory may be preserved during general anaesthesia. We tested for the presence of explicit and implicit memory in patients undergoing surgical procedures with local or regional anaesthesia and sedation with propofol. Initial i.v. boluses of propofol 0.5 mg kg-1 and fentanyl 1 microgram kg-1 were administered, followed by an infusion of propofol 50 micrograms kg-1 min-1. Administration of one or more doses of propofol 30 mg i.v. during operation was controlled either by the patient or the anaesthetist. At the start of the last skin stitch, patients were presented with a list of 15 stimulus words and the most frequently associated response. The infusion was then discontinued. After 1 h in the recovery area, all patients were tested for free recall, free association, cued recall and recognition on the list presented during surgery (critical list) and a matched list not presented (neutral list). Data of all patients without free recall (explicit memory) were analysed with repeated-measures analysis of variance. Of 36 patients, five demonstrated free recall. For the remaining 31 patients, cued recall and recognition showed no evidence of explicit memory. However, the free association tests demonstrated significant priming. The mean number of critical free associations was 6.6 (SEM 0.4) compared with 5.5 (0.4) neutral free association (P < 0.05). In the absence of explicit memory, implicit memory persists after intraoperative sedation with propofol.      

Absence of explicit and implicit memory in unconscious patients using a TCI of propofol

BACKGROUND: Episodes of implicit memory have been described during propofol anaesthesia. It remains unclear whether implicit memory is caused by short periods of awareness or occurs in an unconscious subject. METHODS: Sixty patients were randomized in an experimental group (EG), a control group (CG) and a reference group (RG). Loss of consciousness (LOC) was obtained by progressive stepwise increases of propofol using a target-controlled infusion device (Diprifusor, Alaris Medical Systems, San Diego, CA). A tape containing 20 words was played to the patients in the CG before the start of anaesthesia and to the patients in the EG at a constant calculated concentration of propofol associated with LOC. The tape was not played to the patients in the RG. Three memory tests were performed postoperatively. RESULTS: Explicit and implicit memories were evidenced in the CG but not in the EG. CONCLUSION: In our group of young ASA I/II patients, in the absence of any noxious stimulus, no implicit or explicit memory was found when the calculated concentration of propofol using a Diprifusor was maintained at the level associated with LOC.     

Absence of implicit and explicit memory during propofol/remifentanil anaesthesia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: High doses of opioid associated with low doses of hypnotic is a popular anaesthetic technique since the use of remifentanil has become widespread. This type of anaesthesia could result in a higher incidence of implicit memory. METHODS: Ten patients were anaesthetised with a target-controlled infusion of remifentanil (target concentration of 8 ng mL(-1)) combined with a target-controlled infusion of propofol with progressive stepwise increases until loss of consciousness was reached. A tape containing 20 words was then played to the patients. Bispectral index (BIS, Aspect Medical Systems, Newton, MA, USA) was continuously monitored during the whole study period. Implicit and explicit memories were tested between 2 and 4 h after recovery. RESULTS: Loss of consciousness was obtained with a mean calculated propofol plasma concentration of 1.3 +/- 0.4 microg mL(-1). At this low hypnotic concentration no implicit or explicit memory was found in the three postoperative memory tests. Median (range) BIS value during word presentation was 93 (80-98). CONCLUSIONS: In our group of young American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I/II patients, no explicit or implicit memory was found when the calculated concentration of propofol combined with a high concentration of remifentanil was maintained at the level associated with loss of consciousness with high BIS values.     

Awareness and memory function during paediatric anaesthesia

Background: Previous research indicates a much higher incidence of awarenessduring anaesthesia in children than in adults. The present studyis the first large-scale, intraoperative assessment of awarenessduring paediatric anaesthesia using the isolated forearm technique,and the first large-scale study of memory function during paediatricanaesthesia. Methods: One hundred and eighty-four children, 5–18 yr, underwentthe isolated forearm technique during the first 17 min of surgerywhile receiving volatile anaesthesia. The isolated forearm techniquewas modified to accommodate brief or no paralysis. Bispectralindex was monitored in a subset of 54 patients. Sixteen neutralwords were played 20 times during surgery and, on recovery,implicit memory for these words was tested with a word identificationtask. Explicit memory for the surgical period was tested witha structured interview. Behavioural changes were assessed withage-appropriate questionnaires. Results: No child had explicit recall of intraoperative events on recovery,and there was no evidence of implicit memory for words presentedduring anaesthesia. Two of 184 children made unambiguous andverified responses on the modified isolated forearm technique,an incidence of intraoperative awareness of 1.1%. One of thesechildren reported that he was uncomfortable and not completelyunconscious during surgery. Neither child had implicit memoryfor the neutral words, or adverse behaviour change. Conclusions: The incidence of awareness during surgery in children is approximatelyeight times that measured in adults by postoperative recall.In contrast to adults, there is no evidence for preserved memorypriming during anaesthesia.     

Memory priming during light anaesthesia with desflurane and remifentanil anaesthesia

Background: Previous studies of memory priming during anaesthesia with EEGmonitoring have observed implicit memory effects for words presentedduring light and deep anaesthesia with and without surgicalstimulation. We hypothesized that memory priming occurs undereach of five different combinations of anaesthesia and surgery,and no significant differences occur in memory priming amongthe five conditions or between the two test points such as,12 vs 24 h after surgery. Methods: Forty gynaecological patients (aged between 28 and 66 yr, median44.5 yr) were included in the study. They received propofoland remifentanil induction followed by desflurane and remifentanilanaesthesia in conjunction with neuromuscular blocking agents.Each patient was exposed to 60 of 120 nouns in a double-blindrandomized design. These 60 nouns were divided into 5 groupsof 12 words, presented under one of the five different conditions,namely, intubation, skin incision, deep anaesthesia and moderateanaesthesia (both during surgery), and light anaesthesia duringthe emergence phase. The depth of anaesthesia was measured usingthe EEG monitor, Narcotrend^TM. Results: No explicit memories were observed in a free recall or in ayes–no recognition test. A word-stem completion test revealeda significant implicit priming only for light anaesthesia (P< 0.01). No significant differences were detected among thefive conditions. An overall implicit memory effect occurredfor the second test point (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Our hypotheses could not be verified. Implicit memory primingoccurred only under light anaesthesia, when the patients weremost probably conscious. Priming effects may be enhanced afternight's sleep.     

An Investigation of Learning during Propofol Sedation and Anesthesia Using the Process Dissociation Procedure

Background: Many studies have shown that patients may remember words learned during apparently adequate anesthesia. Performance on memory tests may be influenced by explicit and implicit memory. We used the process dissociation procedure to estimate implicit and explicit memory for words presented during sedation or anesthesia.

Methods: We investigated intraoperative learning in 72 women undergoing pervaginal oocyte collection during propofol and alfentanil infusion. One word list was played once before infusion, another was played 10 times during surgery. Venous blood was taken for propofol assay at the end of the intraoperative list. Behavioral measures of anesthetic depth (eyelash reflex, hand squeeze response to command) were recorded and used to adjust the dose of anesthetic where clinically appropriate. On recovery, memory was assessed using an auditory word stem completion test with inclusion and exclusion instructions.

Results: The mean blood propofol concentration was 2.5 [mu]g/ml (median, 2.3 [mu]g/ml; range, 0.7-6.1 [mu]g/ml). Mean alfentanil dose was 2.1 mg (median, 2.0 mg; range, 1.2-3.4 mg). Comparison of target and distractor hits in the inclusion condition showed memory for preoperative words only. However, the process dissociation procedure estimates showed explicit (mean, 0.18;P < 0.001) and implicit (mean, 0.05;P < 0.05) memory for the preoperative words, and a small amount of explicit memory for the intraoperative words (mean, 0.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.10). Memory performance did not differ between the 17 patients who consistently responded to command and eyelash reflex and the 32 patients who remained unresponsive. Blood propofol concentration and alfentanil dose did not correlate with memory for the intraoperative list.     

Implicit memory for words played during isoflurane- or propofol-based anesthesia: the lexical decision task

BACKGROUND: Unconscious processing of words during general anesthesia has been suggested after surgery with several tests of implicit memory. Patients can neither recall those words nor do they have explicit memories of other intraoperative events. It is unclear to what degree information is processed during general anesthesia and which tests are best suited to detect implicit memory. In the current study, a lexical decision paradigm not previously used to demonstrate implicit memory during anesthesia was used. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing lumbar disc surgery were assigned to receive isoflurane infusion- or propofol infusion-based anesthesia combined with alfentanil infusions and a nitrous oxide-oxygen mixture. A control group of 10 medical students listened to tapes without receiving anesthesia. Two tapes, each containing a list of 30 low-frequency German nouns repeated for 15 min, were prepared, with half of the patients listening to tape A and the other half listening to tape B during the operation. Exposure time was 15 min from the time of skin incision onward. In the test phase, approximately 7 h later, words from lists A and B plus 60 nonwords were presented in random order by a computer program. Subjects were asked to indicate, by pressing one of two response buttons, whether the spoken word was or was not a legal German word (lexical decision). RESULTS: A recognition test revealed chance recognition for words presented during anesthesia. Lexical decision responses, however, were slightly faster to primed (previously presented) words than to unprimed (not previously presented) words when the entire group of patients was tested, suggesting a small implicit memory effect, which barely failed to reach the significance level. When the two medication groups were tested separately, no significant implicit memory effect could be ascertained statistically. The effects of previous exposure were much more pronounced in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Balanced anesthesia techniques with isoflurane or propofol lead to only a minimal, statistically borderline implicit memory effect in the lexical decision paradigm.     

An investigation of learning during propofol sedation and anesthesia using the process dissociation procedure

BACKGROUND: Many studies have shown that patients may remember words learned during apparently adequate anesthesia. Performance on memory tests may be influenced by explicit and implicit memory. We used the process dissociation procedure to estimate implicit and explicit memory for words presented during sedation or anesthesia. METHODS: We investigated intraoperative learning in 72 women undergoing pervaginal oocyte collection during propofol and alfentanil infusion. One word list was played once before infusion, another was played 10 times during surgery. Venous blood was taken for propofol assay at the end of the intraoperative list. Behavioral measures of anesthetic depth (eyelash reflex, hand squeeze response to command) were recorded and used to adjust the dose of anesthetic where clinically appropriate. On recovery, memory was assessed using an auditory word stem completion test with inclusion and exclusion instructions. RESULTS: The mean blood propofol concentration was 2.5 microg/ml (median, 2.3 microg/ml; range, 0.7-6.1 microg/ml). Mean alfentanil dose was 2.1 mg (median, 2.0 mg; range, 1.2-3.4 mg). Comparison of target and distractor hits in the inclusion condition showed memory for preoperative words only. However, the process dissociation procedure estimates showed explicit (mean, 0.18; P < 0.001) and implicit (mean, 0.05; P < 0.05) memory for the preoperative words, and a small amount of explicit memory for the intraoperative words (mean, 0.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.10). Memory performance did not differ between the 17 patients who consistently responded to command and eyelash reflex and the 32 patients who remained unresponsive. Blood propofol concentration and alfentanil dose did not correlate with memory for the intraoperative list. CONCLUSIONS: There was no unprompted recall of surgery, but the process dissociation procedure showed memory for words presented during surgery. This memory was apparently explicit but did not correlate with the measures of depth of anesthesia used.     

Recall during intermittent propofol anaesthesia

We discontinued temporarily an infusion of propofol for surgical reasons in 20 patients undergoing incontinence surgery. The patients, who had not received neuromuscular blockers, were allowed to regain consciousness to a level enabling them to cough on command, open their eyes, and identify and verbally confirm a randomly assigned digit shown on paper. Thereafter, 5-14 min after discontinuation of the propofol infusion, anaesthesia was reinstituted. Memory of the request to cough, a standard conversation and the digit shown was tested 1 h after anaesthesia and on the following day. Only 35% of patients were able to recall one or more of the stimuli presented during wakefulness or were even able to recall having been "awake", and there were very few differences in memory on the day after surgery compared with 1 h after anaesthesia. In comparison with corresponding stimuli given before anaesthesia, memory of material learned during wakefulness was significantly impaired (P < 0.0001). Thus patients temporarily capable of cognitive action during propofol anaesthesia may have no subsequent explicit recall of intraoperative events.      

Implicit Memory for Words Played during Isoflurane- or Propofol-based Anesthesia: The Lexical Decision Task

Background: Unconscious processing of words during general anesthesia has been suggested after surgery with several tests of implicit memory. Patients can neither recall those words nor do they have explicit memories of other intraoperative events. It is unclear to what degree information is processed during general anesthesia and which tests are best suited to detect implicit memory. In the current study, a lexical decision paradigm not previously used to demonstrate implicit memory during anesthesia was used.

Methods: Sixty patients undergoing lumbar disc surgery were assigned to receive isoflurane infusion- or propofol infusion-based anesthesia combined with alfentanil infusions and a nitrous oxide-oxygen mixture. A control group of 10 medical students listened to tapes without receiving anesthesia. Two tapes, each containing a list of 30 low-frequency German nouns repeated for 15 min, were prepared, with half of the patients listening to tape A and the other half listening to tape B during the operation. Exposure time was 15 min from the time of skin incision onward. In the test phase, approximately 7 h later, words from lists A and B plus 60 nonwords were presented in random order by a computer program. Subjects were asked to indicate, by pressing one of two response buttons, whether the spoken word was or was not a legal German word (lexical decision).

Results: A recognition test revealed chance recognition for words presented during anesthesia. Lexical decision responses, however, were slightly faster to primed (previously presented) words than to unprimed (not previously presented) words when the entire group of patients was tested, suggesting a small implicit memory effect, which barely failed to reach the significance level. When the two medication groups were tested separately, no significant implicit memory effect could be ascertained statistically. The effects of previous exposure were much more pronounced in the control group.     

Being awake intermittently during propofol-induced hypnosis: a study of BIS, explicit and implicit memory

BACKGROUND: Being awake during anaesthesia is a serious complication. An anaesthetic depth monitor must discriminate in real time between wakefulness and unconsciousness. The present study created a period of wakefulness during propofol-induced hypnosis. Bispectral index (BIS), explicit and implicit memories of the awake period were investigated. METHODS: Ten volunteers were studied. The calculated brain concentration of a target controlled infusion of propofol was increased until loss of response (LOR) to verbal command and then propofol was stopped. When fully awake, volunteers were presented with a picture, sound and smell. Propofol infusion was restarted until LOR and then ceased. BIS and the calculated brain concentration of propofol were recorded every minute. A structured interview was conducted for explicit memories after awakening and for explicit as well as implicit memories the day after. RESULTS: Median BIS-index for the transition between awake and asleep and vice versa differed significantly. It was not possible, however, to establish any threshold value or zone for discriminating between wakefulness and LOR due to the large inter-individual variations in BIS-index. No volunteer could explicitly recall any of the stimuli presented during the period of wakefulness. CONCLUSION: The BIS-index decreases with increasing sedation but because of the large individual variations, the real-time BIS-index for the individual subject cannot reliably discriminate wakefulness from unconsciousness during propofol infusion. Propofol causes such profound amnesia that lack of postoperative recall does not assure that episodes of awareness have not occurred during propofol-induced hypnosis.     

Relationship between awareness and middle latency auditory evoked responses during surgical anaesthesia

Background. Some studies support the view that meaningful auditoryinput can be processed by the brain during apparent surgicalanaesthesia. Consequently, patients may be able to remembersome information implicitly after anaesthesia as well througha ‘dream-like process’ (subconscious awareness).The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of subconsciousawareness during anaesthesia and to examine its relationshipto the mid-latency auditory evoked responses (MLAERs). Methods. We studied 40 patients, ASA I–II, undergoinglaparoscopic cholecystectomy. General anaesthesia was inducedwith thiopental 5 mg kg^–1, fentanyl 3 µg kg^–1,and vecuronium 0.08 mg kg^–1. For the maintenance of anaesthesia,patients were randomly assigned to one of four anaesthetic regimengroups: sevoflurane+air in oxygen 40%; sevoflurane+nitrous oxide60%; isoflurane+air in oxygen 40%; and isoflurane+nitrous oxide60%. MLAERs were recorded before anaesthesia, at 1 MAC of inhaledanaesthetic and then 30 min after awakening. An audiotape withone of four stories was played immediately after intraoperativeMLAER recording. Explicit and implicit memory was assessed 24h after awakening. Results. None of the patients had explicit recall. One of thepatients from the isoflurane–air group showed implicitmemory of listening to the audiotape. A dream-like process,in which they remembered implicitly the story played duringanaesthesia, occurred in one of the patients from the sevoflurane–nitrousoxide group. In the patients with subconscious awareness, MLAERswere similar to that of the awake state with a Pa latency increaseof less than 8.87. When there was a marked increase in Pa latencyduring anaesthesia, no subconscious awareness was observed.No statistically significant differences were found betweenPa latency before and after anaesthesia. Conclusions. MLAERs may help to predict subconscious cerebralprocessing of auditory inputs during anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 630–5     

Dependence of Explicit and Implicit Memory on Hypnotic State in Trauma Patients

Background: It is still unclear whether memory of intraoperative events results entirely from moments of inadequate anesthesia. The current study was designed to determine whether the probability of memory declines with increasing depth of the hypnotic state.

Method: A list of words was played via headphones during surgery to patients who had suffered acute trauma. Several commonly used indicators of anesthetic effect, including the bispectral index, were recorded during word presentation. First, these indicators served as predictors of the memory performance in a postoperative word stem completion test. Second, general memory performance observed in the first part was separated into explicit and implicit memory using the process dissociation procedure, and then two models of memory were compared: One model assumed that the probability of explicit and implicit memory decreases with increasing depth of hypnotic state (individual differences model), whereas the other assumed equal memory performance for all patients regardless or their level of hypnotic state.

Results: General memory performance declined with decreasing bispectral index values. None of the other indicators of hypnotic state were related to general memory performance. Memory was still significant at bispectral index levels between 60 and 40. A comparison of the two models of memory resulted in a better fit of the individual differences model, thus providing evidence of a dependence of explicit and implicit memory on the hypnotic state. Quantification of explicit and implicit memory revealed a significant implicit but no reliable explicit memory performance.     

Propofol and memory: a study using a process dissociation procedure and functional magnetic resonance imaging

Thirty volunteers randomly received either mild or deep propofol sedation, to assess its effect on explicit and implicit memory. Blood oxygen level‐dependent functional magnetic resonance during sedation examined brain activation by auditory word stimulus and a process dissociation procedure was performed 4 h after scanning. Explicit memory formation did not occur in either group. Implicit memories were formed during mild but not deep sedation (p = 0.04). Mild propofol sedation inhibited superior temporal gyrus activation (Z value 4.37, voxel 167). Deep propofol sedation inhibited superior temporal gyrus (Z value 4.25, voxel 351), middle temporal gyrus (Z value 4.39, voxel 351) and inferior parietal lobule (Z value 5.06, voxel 239) activation. Propofol only abolishes implicit memory during deep sedation. The superior temporal gyrus is associated with explicit memory processing, while the formation of both implicit and explicit memories is associated with superior and middle temporal gyri and inferior parietal lobule activation.     

Dependence of explicit and implicit memory on hypnotic state in trauma patients

BACKGROUND: It is still unclear whether memory of intraoperative events results entirely from moments of inadequate anesthesia. The current study was designed to determine whether the probability of memory declines with increasing depth of the hypnotic state. METHOD: A list of words was played via headphones during surgery to patients who had suffered acute trauma. Several commonly used indicators of anesthetic effect, including the bispectral index, were recorded during word presentation. First, these indicators served as predictors of the memory performance in a postoperative word stem completion test. Second, general memory performance observed in the first part was separated into explicit and implicit memory using the process dissociation procedure, and then two models of memory were compared: One model assumed that the probability of explicit and implicit memory decreases with increasing depth of hypnotic state (individual differences model), whereas the other assumed equal memory performance for all patients regardless of their level of hypnotic state. RESULTS: General memory performance declined with decreasing bispectral index values. None of the other indicators of hypnotic state were related to general memory performance. Memory was still significant at bispectral index levels between 60 and 40. A comparison of the two models of memory resulted in a better fit of the individual differences model, thus providing evidence of a dependence of explicit and implicit memory on the hypnotic state. Quantification of explicit and implicit memory revealed a significant implicit but no reliable explicit memory performance. CONCLUSIONS: This study clearly indicates that memory is related to the depth of hypnosis. The observed memory performance should be interpreted in terms of implicit memory. Auditory information processing occurred at bispectral index levels between 60 and 40.     

Wachzustände während Allgemeinanästhesie Definition,Häufigkeit,klinische Relevanz,Ursachen, Vermeidung und medikolegale Aspekte

The possibility that a patient during general anaesthesia is aware of the operation going on and aware of severe pain that might be remembered postoperatively must be very alarming to patients and anaesthetists alike. Furthermore, there is experimental evidence showing that conscious recall of intraoperative events is only the tip of an iceberg; it seems very probable that there is even a higher incidence of unconscious perception during general anaesthesia. Therefore, the following stages of intraoperative awareness must be distinguished: (1) conscious awareness with explicit recall and with severe pain; (2) conscious awareness with explicit recall but no complaints of pain; (3) conscious awareness without explicit recall and possible implicit recall; (4) subconscious awareness without explicit recall and possible implicit recall; (5) no awareness. The incidence of conscious awareness with explicit recall and severe pain has been estimated at less frequent than 1/3000 general anaesthetics. Conscious awareness with explicit recall but no complaints of pain has been reported in the literature with an incidence of 0.5–2%. With 7–72%, conscious awareness without explicit recall and possible implicit recall shows a very wide range of variation and its occurrence probably depends on the anaesthetic drugs used. Subconscious awareness with possible implicit recall has an incidence of up to 80%, but there are many methodological problems in demonstrating implicit memory of intraoperative events. Reports of intraoperative awareness do not come exclusively from cardiac surgery and obstetrics, but also from all other operative specialities. Postoperatively, patients who experienced intraoperative awareness may develop a so-called post-traumatic stress syndrome. Symptoms involve re-experiencing the event awake or in dreams, sleep disturbances, depression, avoidance of stimuli associated with the event. The probability of the development of the post-traumatic stress syndrome seems to coincide with the experience of severe pain. When a patient complains of intraoperative awareness postoperatively the anaesthesiologist should discuss the event frankly with the patient. When the symptoms of the post-traumatic stress syndrome persist a psychotherapy should follow. Causes for intraoperative awareness may be: equipment failure, too-light anaesthesia, e.g. for a caesarean section or for emergency surgery in severely injured or polytraumatized patients, during cardiac surgery, bronchoscopy or difficult intubation. There is interindividual variability in anaesthetic effect; for example, chronic drug or alcohol abuse or overweight may make increased anaesthetic doses necessary. They are at risk for intraoperative awareness. Some general anaesthetics or anaesthetic procedures, e.g. the combination of a relaxant and N₂O, opioid mono-anaesthetics, or opioids combined with benzodiazepines, seem to involve a higher risk of intraoperative awareness than do volatile anaesthetics. The bases of litigation are medical malpractice, breach of contract by the anaesthesiologist or lack of informed consent from the patient. Therefore, patients who are at risk of intraoperative awareness should be given detailed information on this special risk before the operation.