Nonoperative Treatment of Major Blunt Renal Lacerations With Urinary Extravasation

Purpose

We determined whether nonoperative treatment of major renal lacerations with urinary extravasation adversely affects patient outcome.

Materials and Methods

We reviewed all nonoperatively treated patients who presented between 1983 and 1994 with blunt renal trauma with major lacerations on initial staging computerized tomography. Patients with major lacerations associated with (31) and without (15) extravasation were compared for complications, blood transfusions and length of hospital stay.

Results

Urinary extravasation spontaneously resolved in 27 of 31 patients (87.1%), while 4 (12.9%) required a ureteral stent for persistent extravasation. No complications occurred in patients without extravasation. Mean hospitalization was 8.3 and 7.7 days for patients with isolated renal injuries with and without extravasation, respectively. Blood transfusions were required in 4 patients with and none without extravasation.

Conclusions

Nonoperative treatment of major renal lacerations with urinary extravasation is safe and effective. Although delayed intervention may be required, complications can often be treated with endourological or percutaneous methods.     

Attempted nonoperative management of blunt renal lacerations extending through the corticomedullary junction: the short-term and long-term sequelae

A total of 50 patients who sustained a renal laceration extending through the corticomedullary junction following blunt trauma underwent an attempt at nonoperative (expectant) management of the urological injury. Of the patients 18% could not be stabilized and they subsequently underwent emergency laparotomy. Among our stabilized patients 2 major categories existed: 1) 30 patients with vascularized renal fragments and 2) 11 in whom a fragment of the kidney was devascularized. A statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay (p equals 0.01) and the need for delayed surgical intervention (p less than 0.001) was noted between the 2 groups. We recommend that the physician must have a heightened awareness of probable complications in patients with major renal lacerations associated with devitalized fragments and suggest that early surgical management should be considered.     

Type of blunt renal injury rather than associated extravasation should determine treatment

The significance of extravasation of dye during excretion urography in blunt renal injuries has been controversial, with some believing that extravasation, even if copious, is largely innocuous and characterized by spontaneous resolution, and others believing extravasation is an indication for surgical correction of the underlying blunt renal injury. Thirty-two patients with extravasation diagnosed on excretion urography after blunt external trauma were evaluated. Immediate surgical management of the renal injury was performed in 18 patients who had a contusion in 1, laceration in 13, rupture in 3, and pedicle injury in 1, and averaged 2.0 associated injuries per patient. Conservative management of the renal injury was performed in 14 patients who averaged 1.1 associated injuries per patient. Ten of the 14 patients had a large renal laceration splitting the kidney or disrupting a pole with extravasation and none settled to normal. The data showed that extravasation with a small laceration resolved spontaneously while extravasation with a major disruption of the kidney did not settle to normal.     

Management of high grade renal trauma: 20-year experience at a pediatric level I trauma center

PURPOSE: In the last 20 years the management of high grade, blunt renal trauma at our institution has evolved from primarily an operative approach to an expectant nonoperative approach. To evaluate our experience with the expectant nonoperative management of high grade, blunt renal trauma in children, we reviewed our 20-year experience regarding evaluation, management and outcomes in patients treated at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied all patients sustaining renal trauma between 1983 and 2003. Medical records were reviewed for mechanism of injury, assigned grade of renal injury, patient treatment, indications for and timing of surgery, and outcome. Injuries were categorized as either low grade (I to III) or high grade (IV to V). RESULTS: We reviewed the medical records of 164 consecutive children who sustained blunt renal trauma between 1983 and 2003. A total of 38 patients were excluded for inadequate information. Of the remaining 126 children 60% had low grade and 40% had high grade renal injuries. A total of 11 patients (8.7%) required surgical or endoscopic intervention for renal causes, including 2 for congenital renal abnormalities and 1 for clot retention. Eight patients (6.3%) required surgical intervention for isolated renal trauma, of whom 2 (1.6%) required immediate surgical intervention for hemodynamic instability and 6 (4.8%) were treated with a delayed retroperitoneal approach. Only 4 patients (3.2%) required nephrectomy. All patients receiving operative intervention had high grade renal injury. CONCLUSIONS: Initial nonsurgical management of high grade blunt renal trauma in children is effective and is recommended for the hemodynamically stable child. When a child has persistent symptomatic urinary extravasation delayed retroperitoneal drainage may become necessary to reduce morbidity. Minimally invasive techniques should be considered before open operative intervention. Early operative management is rarely indicated for an isolated renal injury, except in the child who is hemodynamically unstable.     

Blunt renal injuries of intermediate degree

Our experience with 104 cases of blunt renal trauma included 20 injuries of intermediate degree. Of this group, urinary extravasation (60 per cent) and parenchymal laceration (100 per cent) were predominant features exhibited by conventional radiographic studies. Both findings do not require surgical intervention and spontaneous resolution can be anticipated. Nephrectomy (9 cases) and heminephrectomy (2 cases) were perhaps performed unnecessarily in this group since 9 similar patients managed either conservatively (7 cases) or subjected to minor operative procedures on the kidney (2 cases) responded with total functional and anatomic recovery. Arteriography is at times recommended since it can provide information that will give confidence in the conservative management of some cases.     

Initial radiological findings associated with active bleeding control necessity and long term functional outcomes after isolated high grade blunt renal trauma

Introduction: To assess the predictors for conservative management failure and long term outcomes after isolated blunt high grade renal trauma (HGRT).Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with isolated blunt HGRT (renal trauma grade ≥ IV) was conducted. Patients’ demographics, clinical presentation, laboratory and radiological investigations, and different lines of treatment were retrieved. The primary outcome was to assess the predictors of conservative treatment failure (need for active bleeding control e.g.: transarterial angioembolization (TAE) and/or surgical exploration). The secondary outcome was to assess the renal parenchymal volume (RPV) changes post HGRT in correlation with the different lines of management using CT-measured RPV. The difference in RPV ≥ 5% at follow up was considered significant.Results: The study included 63 patients, mean (SD) age was 35.1 (16.6) years. Conservative management was successful in 39 patients (62%), while the need for active bleeding control was required in 16 and 8 patients who underwent TAE and surgical exploration, respectively. Increased hematoma rim distance (HRD), laceration numbers > 3, parenchymal devascularization ≥ 25%, and presence of vascular contrast extravasation (VCE) were predictors for conservative treatment failure (P= 0.006, 0.02, 0.045 and 0.002, respectively). After a mean of 19 months follow up, patients were subclassified into 2 groups: patients with preserved RPV (28 patients) and patients with decreased RPV (29 patients). Renal parenchymal devascularization ≥ 25% was found a predictor for ipsilateral RPV decrease (P = 0.02).Conclusion: Increased HRD, laceration numbers > 3, parenchymal devascularization ≥ 25%, and presence of VCE are findings that reflect the necessity for active bleeding interventions after isolated blunt HGRT. Parenchymal devascularization ≥ 25% is an independent factor for RPV deterioration. Neither the grade of renal trauma nor the type of treatment is a predictor for such deterioration.     

Conservative Management of Major Blunt Renal Trauma with Extravasation: A Viable Option?

Abstract Objectives:   To evaluate our experience in the management of patients with major blunt renal trauma treated at a major urban trauma center during the last ten years. Patients and Methods:   The medical records of 72 patients with major blunt renal lacerations treated from 1998 to 2008 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were broken down into two groups based on whether they were managed conservatively (group 1) or surgically (group 2). Each group was compared with respect to the initial evaluation, computerized tomography findings, associated injuries, hospital stay, transfusion requirements, nephrectomy rate, complications and follow-up imaging. Results:   There were 57 patients with grade IV and 15 patients with grade V renal injuries. Of these, 51 (70.8%) patients were managed conservatively (48 with grade IV and 3 with grade V) and 21 (29.2%) patients were managed surgically (9 with grade IV and 12 with grade V). Patients in group 1 had significantly lower transfusion requirements (3.1 vs. 7.5 units, p < 0.0001), shorter hospital stays (11.8 vs. 15.9 days p < 0.003) and fewer complications (21.6 vs. 76.1%, p < 0.001). No death was observed in group 1, while three in group 2 died of major associated injuries. All surviving patients had significant resolution of the extravasation before hospital discharge. Conclusions:   Our data supports the conservative management of grade IV blunt renal parenchymal injuries in the absence of hemodynamic instability of renal origin. Even select patients with grade V parenchymal injuries can undergo a trial of conservative management.     

Nierentrauma

Most renal injuries are blunt, involve a young patient population, and are caused by motor vehicle accidents or sport injuries. Renal trauma is classified into five grades with the majority of injuries being minor. CT scan has become the standard investigation method and should be performed in blunt trauma with macroscopic hematuria. Open trauma requires a radiological work-up in all forms of hematuria and in cases of clinical suspicion due to the wound entrance. Treatment management of most injuries has become conservative. Absolute indications for surgical revision are persistent life-threatening bleeding, renal pedicle injuries as well as an expanding, pulsatile retroperitoneal hematoma.Indications become relative in the presence of large devitalized renal tissue with urinary extravasation and other abdominal injuries, particularly of the pancreas and the colon. Surgical revision is more often indicated in open trauma, but surgery should enable renal reconstruction in the majority of cases.     

Value of nuclear medicine and ultrasonography in the management of renal trauma (author's transl)

Intravenous urography remains the most decisive investigative method in the management of blunt renal trauma. Even minor urographical changes would merit scintiscan and ultrasound examination in order to visualize or rule out parenchymal lesions, intra- or extrarenal hematomas and urine extravasation as well as assess respirational excursions of the kidney. Follow-up studies may be performed without hesitation. Major lesions (primarily a urinoma) and alarming clinical findings necessitate further diagnostic procedures (angiography, possibly after computer tomography). In case of a surgical intervention, angiography cannot be replaced by any other diagnostic method to date. There are no comparative studies of patients with similar injuries managed alternatively with immediate operation or a conservative approach. However, based on our diagnostic possibilities and therapeutical results, we are in favor of a more expectant management of major renal trauma.     

Evaluation of the management of blunt renal trauma and indication for surgery

OBJECTIVES: Appropriate management of renal trauma is still controversial. Many of the patients have minor injuries and conservative treatment can achieve excellent outcomes without any complications. For major injuries of deep lacerations or ruptures, we have been performing early surgical treatment to salvage the kidney in the selected cases after the precise evaluation of the injury. To obtain the optimal management options, we evaluated the clinical results of our procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study, which included 106 cases of blunt renal trauma with evident etiology over the past 22 years and 9 months. The severity of the injury was evaluated mainly by CT scanning. The indication of renal exploration included persistent renal bleeding, large hematoma around the kidney, dislocated fragments, nonviable tissue, massive urinary extravasation and vascular injury. With the patients who required an operation, we first controlled the bleeding by clamping the hilar vessels. Then, the final decision whether to repair or remove the kidney was made based on the direct inspection of the injured kidney after the complete removal of the hematoma. The severity of renal trauma was classified by the classifications found in The Organ Injury Committee of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were managed conservatively without any interventions, while 22 surgical repairs and 21 nephrectomies were performed. Of the 63 patients, 35 patients (81.4%) were operated on within 2 days after the injury. Judging from systolic blood pressure, red cell count, blood loss during surgery and transfusion requirements, surgically treated patients were more severely injured than conservatively treated patients. And nephrectomized patients than surgically repaired patients. All the surgically repaired cases were confirmed to have preserved renal functions postoperatively. In all of the 50 patients with Grade I injuries, conservative treatment was successful. Eight out of the 19 Grade II and III cases, who were indicated for kidney exploration because of multiple lacerations or considerable bleeding, were also successfully repaired. Localized hematoma with no urine leakage, even when it was large, settled spontaneously without complication. For the 37 Grade IV and V injuries, including 4 cases with hilar injuries, we implemented conservative procedures on 2 patients, surgical repair on 14 patients and nephrectomy on 21 patients. In the conservatively treated cases, one deep laceration with relatively large, but localized, hematoma, and minimal urine extravasation healed spontaneously. Atrophy of the segment and hypertension developed in the other ruptured kidney with dislocated fragments, large hematoma and urine leakage. This kidney, which also required later surgical exploration, did have good parenchymal blood flow. Hilar injury cases were all resulted in nephrectomy. CONCLUSION: In most of our cases the indication for surgical exploration or nephrectomy based on our criteria seemed to be properly decided. Several cases, though, might have received overtreatment. Recent advances in evaluations and strategies of renal trauma have decreased the need for surgical exploration. This may have overreached the indication for conservative management. Severely injured kidneys may be managed conservatively because in most cases bleeding settles after the full formation of large hematoma within the Gerota's fascia. In such cases, though, no one can predict whether the injury will heal spontaneously or not, and, moreover, whether a complication will develop or not. We think that the optimal management of the patient requires an accurate evaluation of the injured kidney. Therefore the indication for surgical exploration should be made based on the degree of the injury.     

Management of severe blunt renal trauma in adult patients: a 10-year retrospective review from an emergency hospital

Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Immediate surgery for major renal trauma has led to a high rate of nephrectomy in comparison with an expectant management. We reviewed our case material on the management of severe blunt renal trauma in adults with emphasis on conservative management. Only shattered kidneys and pedicle avulsion required immediate surgery.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To review retrospectively the management of major blunt renal truma in adult patients admitted to our level I trauma centre.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? Among 1460 blunt abdominal trauma cases collected from January 2001 to December 2010, 221 (15%) affected the kidneys.
• ? All patients, except seven who needed immediate laparotomy, underwent a computed tomography scan to stage the injuries.
• ? Renal injuries were graded according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Grading System; grade 4 and 5 injuries were subclassified based on vascular or parenchymal injury.

RESULTS

• ? Only 45/221 patients (20%) suffered major blunt renal trauma (21 grade 3, 18 grade 4 and six grade 5); 43% of the patients had associated lesions and 77% had gross haematuria.
• ? Nephrectomy rates were 9% for grade 3, 22% for grade 4 and 83% for grade 5 with an exploration rate of 26% for major renal trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

• ? Conservative management of grade 3–5 blunt renal trauma in haemodynamically stable patients yields more favourable results with high renal salvage rate.
• ? Grade 5 injuries still result in a nephrectomy rate of more than 80%.
• ? The absence of data on long‐term outcomes and a potential inclusion bias due to the retrospective nature of the data represent major limitations of this review.

     

Expectant management of blunt renal trauma

Summary Forty-two patients with blunt renal injuries were treated between 1984 and 1994 at our institution. Twenty-nine patients revealed a contusion (grade I injury), 10 showed lacerations (grade II), 1 a severe fracture (grade III), and 2 presented pedicle injuries (grade IV). All 10 patients with incomplete renal injuries (grade II) were treated conservatively, i. e. without primary surgery. One of these 10 patients required surgical intervention 3 months after the trauma due to a urinary obstruction. Two of the ten patients with grade II injuries suffered late complications, namely a contracted kidney in one case and hypertension in the other. This means that of 10 patients with conservatively treated grade II renal trauma, a loss of the function of the affected kidney occurred in only one. In 9 patients complete function of the kidney could be preserved. In conclusion, conservative management of incomplete blunt renal injuries is an effective treatment option with few complications.      

Nonoperative management of major blunt renal lacerations with urinary extravasation: report of two cases

Two cases of major blunt renal trauma with urinary extravasation managed by conservative treatment are presented herein. The first case: A 13-year-old girl fell from a bicycle. A computed tomographic (CT) scan showed right renal laceration with retroperitoneal hematoma. Renal arteriography showed evidence of fresh arterial bleeding without visualization of the lower pole. She was treated conservatively with superselective arterial embolization of the lower pole. She developed no urinoma with normal renal function. Renal renin and blood pressures stayed within the normal range in follow up studies. The second case: A 12-year-old boy fell from a tree and hit his right flank. A CT scan showed fragmentation of right renal cortex with retroperitoneal hematoma. He was treated conservatively as his vital signs remained stable, no active arterial bleeding was found no renal arteriography and both renal pelvis and ureters were well visualized by intra venous pyelography. Retroperitoneal hematoma was absorbed without formation of urinoma. Renal function remained within normal limits in follow up studies.     

Selective operative management of major blunt renal trauma

BACKGROUND: We reviewed the management and outcomes of patients at our Level I trauma center suffering major blunt renal trauma diagnosed and staged by CT scan. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 26 patients with blunt trauma at our institution who were initially hemodynamically stable and diagnosed with grade 4 or 5 renal injuries by CT scan. Patients were broken down into two groups based on whether they were managed conservatively or surgically. Patient characteristics and morbidity were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 14 patients managed conservatively and 12 patients managed surgically. There was no statistically significant difference in morbidity between the two groups. The only statistically significant predictor of failure of conservative management was a coexisting solid organ intra-abdominal injury. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative management of major blunt renal trauma is appropriate in hemodynamically stable patients.     

Grade 4 renal injury: current trend of management and future directions

The management of blunt renal trauma has been evolving. The past management largely based on American Association for Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grading system, i.e. necessitated a computed tomography (CT)scan. Although the CT scan use is increasing and becomes the standardized mode of investigation, AAST grading no longer plays the sole role in the decision of surgical interventions. Two case reports of blunt renal trauma managed successfully by conservative methods are presented.Case one was an 18 year-old boy who had a fall when riding a motorbike at 20 km/h with a helmet and full protective equipments. He was landed by his left flank onto a rock.Contrast abdominal CT revealed a 4 em, grade Ⅲ splenic tear and a grade Ⅳ left kidney injury with large perirenal haematoma. His international severity score (ISS) was 34.He was managed conservatively with bed rest and frequent serum haemoglobin monitoring. Subsequent CT with delayed contrast revealed stable perirenal haematoma with urine extravasation which was consistent with a grade Ⅳ renal injury. Case two was a 40 year-old male who had a motor bike accident on a racetrack when he was driving at 80 to 100 km/h, wearing a helmet. He lost control and hit onto the sidewall of the racetrack. Contrast abdominal CT revealed a grade Ⅳ left renal injury with a large urine extravasation. His renal injury was managed conservatively with interval delayed phase CT of the abdomen. A repeat CT on abdomen was performed five months after the initial injury which revealed no residual urinoma.In this study, moreover, a review of the literature to the management of blunt renal trauma was conducted to demonstrate the trend of increasing conservative management of such traumas. Extra radiological parameters may guide future decision making. However, the applicability of data may be limited until randomized trials are available.     

Management of grade IV renal injury in children

PURPOSE: Conservative nonsurgical management of major renal trauma in children is well established. However, when blunt trauma is accompanied by significant urinary extravasation, options are less than clearly defined. Endoscopic techniques, such as stents and percutaneous drainage, have not been widely used because of small caliber. We present our experience with endoscopic management of grade IV renal trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1983 to 1996, 15 children satisfied the criteria for grade IV renal trauma. We retrospectively reviewed the charts to assess the mechanism of injury, associated injury, treatment, hospital stay and transfusion requirement. Patients were followed clinically with blood pressure and creatinine monitoring, and by radiograph with computerized tomography. RESULTS: Nine patients with isolated kidney injury were successfully treated with observation, 1 underwent early partial nephrectomy for persistent anemia and hypotension, and 5 had a urinoma, which was successfully treated with percutaneous drainage only in 2. The other 3 patients underwent cystoscopy and ureteral stent placement for high drainage output, leading to the resolution of urine leakage. In 1 patient who underwent percutaneous drainage only renovascular hypertension developed, requiring partial nephrectomy 3 months after the original injury. The remaining 13 patients had complete radiographic resolution of the injury and no evidence of hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: In the pediatric population grade IV blunt renal trauma usually resolves without intervention. When a symptomatic urinoma develops, percutaneous drainage, accompanied at times by ureteral stenting provides the complete resolution of persistent urine leakage.     

Conservative treatment of stage III kidney injuries

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of conservative management in stage III renal trauma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 150 patients who presented in our institution with renal trauma between 1986 and 1995. RESULTS: Minor injuries (stage I and II: 100 cases) were treated with expectant management. Only 3 patients required nephrectomy in this group. Stage III injuries were seen in 40 patients. The great majority (85%) were treated conservatively with renal sparing procedures such as endourologic techniques (14 cases), nephrorraphy or partial nephrectomy (20 cases). Total nephrectomy was performed in 15% of the cases and only for severely injured kidney or major associated intraabdominal injuries. In this group, none of the patients suffered from hypertension at follow-up. All patients (10 cases) with pedicle injury (stage IV) required total nephrectomy. CONCLUSION: Stage III renal trauma with urinary extravasation can safely be treated conservatively.     

Management of major blunt renal lacerations: is a nonoperative approach indicated?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to determine whether a nonoperative approach is able to reduce renal parenchymal loss after renal trauma. METHODS: Sixty-four consecutive patients with major blunt renal lacerations were treated from 1988 to 1999. Initial management was conservative. In group 1 (35 patients) delayed hemorrhage, persistent urinoma or hemodynamic instability were dealt with by open surgery. In group 2 (29 patients), most complications were dealt with using endoscopic procedures; open surgery was reserved exclusively for major complications. RESULTS: In group 1, 7 patients were not operated and 28 patients were managed surgically. Twenty (57%) patients underwent total (8) or partial (12) nephrectomy. In 8 patients the surgical intervention was open drainage of perinephric collection (6) and/or renorrhaphies (2). Four patients in this group developed urinary fistulae treated successfully with ureteral stents. Length of hospital stay was 9.6 days (3-25 days). In group 2, persistent hemodynamic instability led to nephrectomy in 1 case. The remaining 28 patients were managed conservatively, with endoscopic ureteric stenting in 5 cases. A persistent urinary extravasation with hyperthermia led to open drainage of perinephric urinoma (5) and renorrhaphy (2). No delayed nephrectomy was necessary. Average hospital stay was 12 days (5-21 days). Only 1 patient in this group developed hypertension. CONCLUSION: For most patients and with close follow-up available, conservative treatment represents a real alternative to open surgery in major blunt renal lacerations. In our experience, open surgery usually results in loss of renal parenchyma.     

Traumatic rupture of horseshoe kidney

We present the case of a 25-year-old male who came to the emergency room for pain and abdominal distension following trauma to the mesogastrium. A CT scan was performed, revealing a voluminous retroperitoneal hematoma with laceration of both inferior renal poles with regard to rupture of the isthmus of a horseshoe kidney. The patient presented anemization and increased pain, requiring selective embolization by means of arteriography of a branch of the right renal artery and placement of a double J stent due to urinary extravasation in the lower left kidney pole. Following 1 year of monitoring, the patient has maintained normal renal function. Renal affection in blunt abdominal trauma is frequent, occurring in 7% of previously pathological kidneys. The traumatic rupture of horseshoe kidney is facilitated by its particular anatomical characteristics, constituting an infrequent entity, knowledge of which is necessary to achieve conservative management that renders it possible to preserve renal function.     

Features and outcomes of patients with grade IV renal injury

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical features and outcomes of patients who presented with grade IV renal trauma to our urban level I trauma hospital and to further refine the absolute indications for exploration and determine the outcomes of conservative management.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 77 patients with grade IV traumatic renal injuries presented to our emergency department between October 1997 and October 2006. A prospective trauma database including these patients was analysed to determine the patterns of injury, operative outcomes and complications.

RESULTS

A quarter of the patients had gunshot injuries, 9% had stab injuries, and 66% had blunt traumas. In all, 36% of patients required surgical exploration to treat associated non‐urological injuries. There was no or microscopic haematuria in 29% of the patients. Of the 32 patients who underwent renal exploration, 63% (20/32) underwent renorrhaphy and 37% (12/32) underwent nephrectomy. In multivariate analyses, only gunshot injury, surgery for non‐urological injury, and volume of blood transfused were significantly associated with the need for renal exploration (P = 0.015, P = 0.041, and P = 0.032, respectively). The renal complication rate was higher in patients managed conservatively vs those who underwent surgical exploration, but this was not statistically significantly different (28% vs 13%, P = 0.2). Hospital stay was longer after renal exploration than after conservative management at a median of 12 days vs 7 days (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

While almost all patients with penetrating injury require renal exploration, only 20% of those with blunt trauma do. Patients with no renal injuries and/or haemodynamic instability are more likely to require exploration. Finally, the rate of complications was not statistically different according to management type (conservative vs renal exploration).