Phase I dose-escalating study of 24-h continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in combination with weekly docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer

Purpose

To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of a 24-h continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) when administered in combination with a fixed weekly dose of docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

Patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (n = 21) received a weekly regimen of docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU (DCF) for 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks. The doses of docetaxel and cisplatin were fixed at 33.3 and 30 mg/m², respectively. The dose of 5-FU was increased from a starting dose of 1,000 mg/m² to the MTD.

Results

A total of 53 cycles of chemotherapy were administered (median = 3 cycles/patient). The MTD of 5-FU was 1,750 mg/m². All 21 patients were assessed for toxicity and 19 patients (90%) were evaluated for response. Both grade 3–4 hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities occurred in less than 10% of patients and there were no treatment-related deaths. Among the 19 patients, we observed 1 complete and 4 partial responses for an overall response rate of 26% (95% CI: 6–46%). This rate increased to 39% (95% CI: 12–66%) in 13 chemotherapy-naïve patients.

Conclusions

A consecutive weekly DCF regimen at 4-week intervals appears feasible for advanced gastric cancer with a favorable toxicity profile. The recommended doses are 33.3 mg/m² of docetaxel, 30 mg/m² of cisplatin and 1,500 mg/m² of a 24-h continuous intravenous infusion of 5-FU. The response of this weekly regimen in our study was favorable and deserved further investigation in a phase II trial.     

Phase II study of a fixed dose-rate infusion of gemcitabine associated with erlotinib in advanced pancreatic cancer

Purpose

To evaluate the feasibility, toxicity and efficacy of the combination regimen consisting of gemcitabine-FDR infusion plus erlotinib, in ACP patients.

Methods

Forty-two patients with histologically confirmed, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were included in this phase II trial. Main objectives were to assess the efficacy and safety of this regimen. Therapeutic regimen consisted of gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m² in 120-min infusion on days 1, 8 and 15, plus erlotinib 100 mg orally once daily. Cycles were repeated every 28 days.

Results

A total of 160 courses of gemcitabine-FDR erlotinib were administered (median 3.8 courses per patient). The most common grade 3–4 AEs were neutropenia (21%), thrombocytopenia (10%), skin rash (10%) and asthenia (10%). Complete response was achieved in one patient (2%) and 11 (26%) achieved a partial response. Stable disease and progression disease were observed in 11 patients (26%) and 19 (45%), respectively. Median time to progression was 5 months (95%CI: 3.9–5.8 months) and median overall survival was 8 months (95% CI: 5.1–10.8). One-year survival rate was 35%.

Conclusions

A regimen consisting of gemcitabine-FDR infusion plus erlotinib is active and well tolerated in APC patients. However, the results do not justify the conduct of a Phase III trial.     

Irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin third-line chemotherapy after failure of fluoropyrimidine, platinum, and taxane in gastric cancer: treatment outcomes and a prognostic model to predict survival

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and safety of the combination chemotherapy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI regimen) after failure of fluoropyrimidine, platinum, and taxane in gastric cancer (GC) and to evaluate the prognostic factors for survival.

Methods

Patients received biweekly FOLFIRI chemotherapy as third-line treatment. The FOLFIRI-1 consisted of irinotecan (180 mg/m² in a 2-h infusion) on day 1, and then leucovorin (200 mg/m² in a 2-h infusion) and 5-FU (a 400 mg/m² bolus, followed by 600 mg/m² in a 22-h continuous infusion) on days 1 and 2. FOLFIRI-2 consisted of irinotecan (180 mg/m² in a 2-h infusion) on day 1, and then leucovorin (400 mg/m² in a 2-h infusion) and 5-FU (a 400 mg/m² bolus, followed by 2400 mg/m² in a 46-h continuous infusion) on day 1.

Results

A total of 158 patients were included. The overall response rate was 9.6 % in patients with measurable lesions. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.1 months [95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.7–2.5] and 5.6 months (95 % CI, 4.7–6.5), respectively. The major grade 3/4 toxicity was myelosuppression (36.7 %). Good performance status (PS), fewer metastatic sites, and longer duration from the first-line to third-line chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors affecting both PFS and OS.

Conclusions

The FOLFIRI regimen showed antitumor activity and tolerable toxicity profiles against advanced GC in the third-line setting. Patients with good PS, fewer metastatic sites and longer previous treatment duration might have the maximal benefit from third-line chemotherapy.     

Phase I–II trial of prolonged gemcitabine infusion plus paclitaxel as a biweekly schedule for advanced breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracyclines

Purpose

Paclitaxel (PACL) plus gemcitabine (GEM) is an effective regimen for advanced breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracyclines. A prolonged GEM infusion at a fixed dose rate (FDR) of 10 mg/m²/min produces higher levels of intracellular active metabolites of GEM when compared with a standard 30-min infusion. In the present phase I/II trial, we investigated the association of FDR GEM plus PACL.

Methods

1,200 mg/m² was the dose of GEM recommended for the phase II study, in which patients received PACL at 150 mg/m², followed by FDR GEM at 1,200 mg/m² (total GEM infusion time = 120 min), both drugs administered biweekly.

Results

Forty-two anthracycline-pretreated advanced breast cancer patients with disease recurrence following at least one line of chemotherapy were enrolled. Two (4.8%) and 12 (33.3%) patients experienced a complete and partial response, respectively, for an overall response rate of 38.1% (95% CI 23.4–52.8%). Median progression free survival and overall survival were 5 and 19.9 months, respectively. No statistically significant association was noted between in situ protein expression of RRM1 and BRCA1 (as assessed by immunofluorescence combined with automated quantitative analysis) and response to treatment in 15 patients with tissue available for analysis. Toxicity was mostly mild to moderate, mainly consisting of G3–G4 neutropenia (9.6%) and hypertransaminasemia (9.5%).

Conclusions

Biweekly FDR GEM in combination with PACL is an active and safe regimen for advanced breast cancer patients pretreated with anthracyclines. A prolonged infusion regimen of GEM does not seem to improve the efficacy of a standard 30-min infusion.     

Randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil with node-positive breast cancer in Japan

Background

To compare the cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy and the anthracycline-containing regimen cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the latter.

Methods

A total of 294 patients with axillary node-positive primary breast cancer of STAGE I–IIIa were randomly assigned to either CEF [cyclophosphamide (CPA) 500 mg/m² i.v. days 1 and 8; epirubicin (EPI) 60 mg/m² i.v. day 1; and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m² i.v. days 1 and 8] or CMF [CPA 500 mg/m² i.v. days 1 and 8; methotrexate (MTX) 40 mg/m² i.v. days 1 and 8; and 5-FU 500 mg/m² i.v. days 1 and 8]. Both treatment regimens were comprised of six cycles at 4-week intervals. Tamoxifen (TAM) 20 mg/day was concomitantly given to estrogen receptor (ER)-positive patients and those with undetermined ER status for 2 years.

Results

The overall 5-year survival was 77.1% for CEF and 71.4% for CMF [p = 0.24; hazard ratio 0.79 (95% CI 0.50–1.24)], and the 5-year disease-free survival was 55.7% for CEF and 48.9% for CMF [p = 0.15; hazard ratio 0.80 (95% CI 0.57–1.12)]. Although the log-rank test did not show a significant difference, both overall and disease-free survivals were higher for CEF according to the point estimates. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred more frequently in CEF.

Conclusion

Whereas CEF had a good trend compare with CMF, it could not be proven statistically significant. The principal cause of the failure seems to be insufficient power, that is, the dose intensity (EPI: 60 mg/m²) set 10 years ago, when the trial began, was low, and the number of trial subjects was small because of the background of the times, which made the accumulation of cases extremely difficult. However, the trial should be considered to be meaningful, as it was the first, formally conducted controlled trial on chemotherapy in Japan.     

A phase II trial of prolonged,continuous infusion of low-dose gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma

Purpose

Low-dose, prolonged infusion of gemcitabine has effects similar to standard doses in several cancers. We evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of low-dose gemcitabine in prolonged infusion plus cisplatin in patients with advanced pleural mesothelioma.

Methods

Patients with mesothelioma received gemcitabine (250 mg/m²) in a 6-h infusion plus cisplatin (35 mg/m²) on days 1 and 8 every three weeks. We used the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumours. This study is registered in clinical trials (NCT01869023).

Results

We included 39 patients; 82.1 % were low risk according to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer prognostic group. Partial response was observed in 53.8 % (21/39), stable disease in 33.3 % (13/39) and progression in 12.8 % (5/39). The median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95 % CI 3.2–10.6 months), and the associated factors were the EORTC risk and histology. The median overall survival was 20.7 months (95 % CI 10.7–30.8 months). The functional, physical and emotional roles and dyspnoea, insomnia and pain symptom scales improved. The most commonly graded 3/4 side effects were neutropenia (24.4 %), lymphopenia (14.6 %), thrombocytopenia (14.7 %) and anaemia (12.2 %).

Conclusions

Low-dose, prolonged gemcitabine infusion plus cisplatin has acceptable toxicity and high efficacy with improved quality of life, representing an affordable regimen for the low-income population.     

Efficacy and tolerability of chemotherapy with modified dose-dense TCF regimen (TCF-dd) in locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer: final results of a phase II trial

Background

We previously studied a dose-dense TCF (TCF-dd) regimen demonstrating its feasibility and an activity comparable to epirubicin-based chemotherapy and TCF q3w in terms of overall survival and time to progression (TTP). We report here the final results of a phase II study of chemotherapy with a modified TCF-dd regimen in locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer (MGC).

Methods and study design

Patients with histologically confirmed measurable MGC, not previously treated for advanced disease, received docetaxel 70 mg/m² day 1, cisplatin 60 mg/m² day 1, l-folinic acid 100 mg/m² days 1 and 2, followed by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m² bolus days 1 and 2, and then 600 mg/m² as a 22-h continuous infusion days 1 and 2, every 14 days, plus pegfilgrastim 6 mg on day 3. Patients aged ≥65 years received the same schedule with a dose reduction of 30 %.

Results

Study duration: December 2007–November 2010. Forty-six consecutive patients were enrolled (78 % male, 22 % female; median age, 66 years, range, 38–76 years; ECOG PS: 0, 48 %, 1, 46 %). Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). A median of four cycles (range, one to six) was administered. Forty-three patients were evaluated for response (93.5 %) and all for toxicity: 3 complete response (CR), 25 partial response (PR), 10 stable disease (SD), and 5 progressive disease (PD) were observed, for an ORR by intention to treat (ITT) of 61 % (95 % CI 47–75). Median overall survival (OS) was 17.63 months (95 % CI, 13.67–20.67); median progression-free survival was 8.9 months (95 % CI, 6.5–13.4). Twenty-one patients (46.0 %) were treated at full doses without any delay, thus respecting the dose-dense criterion. Most frequent grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia (20 %), leukopenia (4 %), thrombocytopenia (2 %), anemia (2 %), febrile neutropenia (6 %), asthenia (22 %), diarrhea (4 %), nausea/vomiting (11 %), and hypokalemia (6 %). Overall, TCF-dd was shown to be safe.

Conclusions

The TCF-dd regimen in locally advanced or MGC is confirmed to be feasible and very active and needs to be further tested in randomized studies.     

E5501: phase II study of topotecan sequenced with etoposide/cisplatin, and irinotecan/cisplatin sequenced with etoposide for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

Purpose

Sequence-dependent improved efficacy of topoisomerase I followed by topoisomerase 2 inhibitors was assessed in a randomized phase II study in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Methods

Patients with previously untreated extensive-stage SCLC with measurable disease, ECOG performance status of 0–3 and stable brain metastases were eligible. Arm A consisted of topotecan (0.75 mg/m²) on days 1, 2 and 3, etoposide (70 mg/m²) and cisplatin (20 mg/m²) (PET) on days 8, 9 and 10 in a 3-week cycle. Arm B consisted of irinotecan (50 mg/m²) and cisplatin (20 mg/m²) on days 1 and 8 followed by etoposide (85 mg/m² PO bid) on days 3 and 10 (PIE) in a 3-week cycle.

Results

We enrolled 140 patients and randomized 66 eligible patients to each arm. Only 54.5 % of all patients completed the planned maximum 6 cycles. There were grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events in approximately 70 % of the patients on both arms including 6 treatment-related grade 5 events. The overall response rates (CR + PR) were 69.7 % (90 % CI 59.1–78.9, 95 % CI 57.1–80.4 %) for arm A and 57.6 % (90 % CI 46.7–67.9, 95 % CI 44.8–69.7 %) for arm B. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.4 months (95 % CI 5.4–7.5 months) and 11.9 months (95 % CI 9.6–13.7 months) for arm A and 6.0 months (95 % CI 5.4–7.0 months) and 11.0 months (95 % CI 8.6–13.1 months) for arm B.

Conclusion

Sequential administration of topoisomerase inhibitors did not improve on the historical efficacy of standard platinum-doublet chemotherapy for extensive-stage SCLC.     

Triplet combination with paclitaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU is effective in metastatic and/or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Purpose

Platinum-based chemotherapy is the recognized first-line treatment for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, no standard treatment regimens have been established. This phase II study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a paclitaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU combination in metastatic and/or recurrent NPC.

Methods

Patients with evaluable metastatic and/or recurrent NPC were entered into this study. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel at a dose of 135 mg/m² on day 1, cisplatin 25 mg/m²/day from day 1 to day 3 and 5-FU-continuous infusion for 120 h at a variable dosage from 600 to 1,000 mg/m²/day according to prior radiation. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks.

Results

A total of 95 patients were enrolled; 92 patients were evaluable for response. The overall response and disease control rates were 78.9 and 93.6 %, respectively. At a median follow-up of 24.8 months, the respective median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were 22.7 months (95 % CI 18.6–26.9 months) and 8.6 months (95 % CI 7.7–9.5 months). Toxicities were moderate and manageable. Grade 3/4 toxicities included leucopenia (14.7 %), neutropenia (17.9 %), anemia (3.2 %), thrombocytopenia (6.4 %), nausea (4.2 %), vomiting (9.5 %), stomatitis (9.5 %), diarrhea (3.2 %), aminotransferase (2.2 %) and sensory neuropathy (3.2 %).

Conclusion

Triplet combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU is an effective and safe option in the front-line treatment for recurrent and/or metastatic NPC. The encouraging results with high response rate and long OS suggest that this regimen might be especially considered where tumor shrinkage is required.     

Three-year outcomes of a phase II study of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus docetaxel for stage III gastric cancer after curative D2 gastrectomy

Background

We have previously reported the superior feasibility and safety of adjuvant S-1 plus docetaxel in patients with stage III gastric cancer during a prospective phase II study. We report 3-year follow-up data on patients enrolled in this study.

Patients and methods

Fifty-three patients with histologically confirmed stage III gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy were enrolled into this study. They received oral S-1 (80 mg/m²/day) for 2 consecutive weeks and intravenous docetaxel (40 mg/m²) on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks (one cycle). Treatment was initiated within 45 days after surgery and repeated for four cycles, followed by S-1 monotherapy (4 weeks on, 2 weeks off) until 1 year after surgery. Three-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated.

Results

The OS rate at 3 years was 78.4 % [95 % confidence interval (CI), 67.9–90.6 %] and the DFS rate at 3 years was 66.2 % (95 % CI, 54.4–80.7 %). Subgroup analyses according to disease stage showed a 3-year OS and DFS rate of 85.7 % (95 % CI, 74.9–98.1 %) and 70.8 % (95 % CI, 57.1–87.8 %) for stage IIIA, and 62.5 % (95 % CI, 42.8–91.4 %) and 56.2 % (95 % CI, 36.5–86.7 %) for stage IIIB, respectively.

Conclusions

On the basis of 3-year follow-up data, postoperative adjuvant therapy with S-1 plus docetaxel yielded promising OS and DFS in stage IIIA gastric cancer patients who had undergone D2 gastrectomy. We believe that this regimen is a candidate for future phase III trials studying the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for stage III gastric cancer.     

A multicenter phase II study of biweekly capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer

Purpose

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of biweekly capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin in previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.

Methods

Patients received oral capecitabine 1,000 mg/m² twice daily on days 1–10 plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² as a 2-h intravenous infusion on day 1, every 2 weeks (XELOX). The primary endpoint was overall response rate. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity.

Results

From March 2007 to October 2010, 46 patients were enrolled in this phase II study. The median age was 64 years (range 32–85). A total of 391 (median 7.5, range 1–29) cycles were delivered. Among the 41 patients evaluable for tumor response, 9 showed partial response and 25 had stable disease. The overall response rates of the evaluable and intent-to-treat (ITT) populations were 22 % (95 % CI 10–42 %) and 20 % (95 % CI 9–34 %), respectively. In the ITT analysis, the progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.6 months (95 % CI 4.1–6.3 months) and 8.0 months (95 % CI 6.3–10.1 months), respectively. The most common hematological toxicities were thrombocytopenia (35 %) and leucopenia (34 %), whereas the most common non-hematological toxicities were neuropathy (35 %), fatigue (33 %), diarrhea (27 %), vomiting (26 %), and hand-foot syndrome (25 %). Major grade 3–4 toxicities were anemia (11 %), diarrhea (9 %), and hand-foot syndrome (7 %). No patient died of treatment-related toxicities.

Conclusions

Although the biweekly XELOX regimen failed its primary response rate endpoint, it showed modest efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.     

A randomized phase II study of biweekly irinotecan monotherapy or a combination of irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (mFOLFIRI) in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma refractory to or progressive after first-line chemotherapy

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of irinotecan (CPT-11) monotherapy and CPT-11 plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) combination (mFOLFIRI) as second-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

Methods

A total of 59 patients were randomly assigned to either CPT-11 (150 mg/m² iv on day 1) or mFOLFIRI (CPT-11 150 mg/m² plus LV 20 mg/m² on day 1 followed by 5-FU 2,000 mg/m² over 48 h), every 2 weeks. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR).

Results

Following random assignment, 29 patients received CPT-11 and 30 patients mFOLFIRI. The ORR was 17.2 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 3.4–30.9] and 20.0 % (95 % CI 5.6–34.3) for the CPT-11 and mFOLFIRI arms, respectively (P = 0.525). There was no significant difference in median progression-free survival: 2.2 months (95 % CI 0.2–4.3) for CPT-11 versus 3.0 months (95 % CI 2.0–3.7) for mFOLFIRI (P = 0.481) or in median overall survival: 5.8 months (95 % CI 3.0–8.7), compared with 6.7 months (95 % CI 5.3–8.2) (P = 0.514). Grade 3/4 toxicity was observed in 21 and 28 events in the CPT-11 and mFOLFIRI arms, respectively.

Conclusions

Although this study had a small sample size and limited statistical power, CPT-11 monotherapy and mFOLFIRI appear to be equally active and tolerable as second-line chemotherapy for AGC. The addition of 5-FU/LV to CPT-11 did not significantly improve efficacy.     

Bevacizumab plus preoperative chemotherapy in operable HER2 negative breast cancer: biomarkers and pathologic response

Purpose

The primary aim of this trial was to assess the rate of pathologic complete responses (pCR) of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by bevacizumab/docetaxel (BT), as neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer (BC). Furthermore, the association between biomarkers and the pCR was explored.

Methods

Patients with HER-negative operable stage II–III BC ≥2 cm were enrolled. Four cycles of AC (A 60 mg/m² and C 600 mg/m², every 3 weeks) followed by 4 cycles of BT (B 15 mg/kg and T 75 mg/m², every 3 weeks), were planned. A core-biopsy was performed for biological markers assessment.

Results

Seventy-two women were included. Forty-three (63 %) patients were hormone receptor-positive. Sixty-four (89 %) completed the planned treatment, and 66 evaluable patients underwent surgery (92 %): a pCR was achieved in 16 of them (24, 95 % CI 15–36 %). pCR was significantly higher in tumors hormone receptor-negative, and in those with Angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AGTR1) protein overexpression. The overall clinical response rate was 86 % (95 % CI 76–93 %), including 42 complete responses. No unexpected toxicities or treatment-related deaths were observed.

Conclusion

This regimen showed a remarkable clinical and pathological activity: the suggested relation between pCR and AGTR1 overexpression should be confirmed in larger trials.     

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with unresectable biliary cancer including gall bladder cancer: a Korean Cancer Study Group phase II trial

Purpose

Chemotherapy represents a palliative treatment, with poor response rates and a median survival of less than 6 months in patients with biliary tract cancers (BTCs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in patients with BTCs including gall bladder cancer.

Methods

We carried out a nationwide multicenter phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of GEMOX as first-line therapy in patients with advanced BTCs. Eligible patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic BTCs received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² (day 1 and 8) and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m² (day 1), every 3 weeks.

Results

Fifty-three patients were evaluated, 60% had cholangiocarcinoma and the remaining 40% gall bladder cancer; the objective response rate was 18.9% (10/53 patients including 1 Complete response) [14.9%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 7.4–25.7%] in the treated population. Stable disease were observed in 27/53 (50.9%) patients, disease control rate was achieved in 69.8% of all patients. Median progression-free survival was 4.8 months (3.1–6.5, 95% CI) and median overall survival was 8.3 months (5.8–10.8, 95% CI). Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (33.9% of patients) and thrombocytopenia (7.6%).

Conclusions

The GEMOX regimen demonstrated a modest antitumor activity and is well tolerated in patients with advanced BTCs.     

Phase II trial of paclitaxel and cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer

Purpose

Paclitaxel–cisplatin (TC) combination is effective and well tolerated in patients with unresectable gastric cancer. We investigated the efficacy and safety of TC for locally advanced gastric cancers in a neoadjuvant setting.

Methods

Patients received 2–4 courses of paclitaxel (80 mg/m²) and cisplatin (25 mg/m²) on days 1, 8, and 15 in a 4-weekly schedule, followed by radical gastrectomy. Primary endpoint was the pathological response rate: percentage of tumors in which one-third or more parts were affected.

Results

All 52 patients enrolled were eligible. Thirty-six (69.7 %) patients completed two or more courses of chemotherapy. Forty-three patients (82.7 %) underwent surgery, 33 (63.5 %) had R0 resection, and there was no treatment-related death. The pathological response was 34.6 % (95 % CI 22.0–49.1) for all registered patients; the null hypothesis of tumor response ≤10 % was rejected (p < 0.0001). The 3-year overall survival was 41.5 % (95 % CI 27.4–55.0).

Conclusions

The neoadjuvant chemotherapy with TC was safe and effective for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer, and further study is needed to confirm the effectiveness of this regimen.     

Biweekly docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase I dose-escalation study

Background and purpose

The optimal chemotherapeutic protocol for the treatment of esophageal cancer has not yet been established. A dose-escalation study of docetaxel combined with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was performed to determine the optimal dose in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Patients and method

We studied a total of 18 patients who had previously untreated thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with T4 tumors and/or metastasis. The patients received an infusion of docetaxel at different dose levels (levels 1, 2, 3: 30, 35, 40 mg/m², respectively) and an infusion of cisplatin (40 mg/m²) on days 1 and 15 plus a continuous infusion of 5-FU (400 mg/m²/day) on days 1–5 and 15–19.

Results

Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) included febrile neutropenia and leukopenia. DLT occurred in 2 of 6 patients at level 1, 2 and in 3 of 6 patients at level 3. The response rate was 88.9%, including a complete response rate of 33.3%.

Conclusions

To minimize toxicity and maximize dose intensity, we elected to investigate a biweekly regimen. The maximum tolerated dose was level 3, and the recommended dose was determined to be docetaxel 35 mg/m² with cisplatin 40 mg/m² plus 5-FU 400 mg/m², administered biweekly. This regimen was tolerable and highly active. A phase II study has been started.     

Phase I/II and pharmacokinetic study of S-1 and oxaliplatin in previously untreated advanced gastric cancer

Background

We aimed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of S-1 when given with oxaliplatin, to evaluate S-1 pharmacokinetics, and to determine the efficacy and safety of this regimen as a first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

Methods

Oxaliplatin was fixed at a dose of 130 mg/m² on day 1 (D1). S-1 was administered from D1 to D14 of a 3-week cycle, and escalated by 10 mg/m² per day from 70 mg/m² per day up to 100 mg/m² per day. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed following a single dose of S-1 on D-5 and D1 of the first cycle.

Results

In phase I (n = 18), MTD was not defined. In phase II (n = 47) with the planned maximum dose, partial response was achieved in 26 patients (55.3%) and stable disease in 14 patients (29.8%). The median time to progression was 6.6 months (95% CI 4.0–9.2 months) and the median overall survival was 12.5 months (95% CI 9.2–15.9 months). Frequent grade 3/4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia (39%), neutropenia (28%), anemia (17%), and leukopenia (13%). There was one grade 5 febrile neutropenia during the first cycle.

Conclusions

The pharmacokinetics of S-1 was not influenced by oxaliplatin. S-1/Oxaliplatin combination therapy is highly active against AGC and has a favorable toxicity profile.     

A phase II study of oxaliplatin in combination with leucovorin and fluorouracil as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus

Purpose

Squamous cell carcinoma is the main histological subtype of esophageal cancer in the east Asia. Oxaliplatin and fluorouracil are active agents for esophageal carcinoma. The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

Patients with metastatic ESCC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0–2 who had not received prior systemic chemotherapy for metastatic disease were enrolled. Oxaliplatin, 100 mg/m², was administered as a 2-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion on day 1. Leucovorin, 400 mg/m² i.v., was administered as a 2-h infusion followed by fluorouracil (400 mg/m²) i.v. bolus immediately followed by fluorouracil (2,400 mg/m²) as a 46-h continuous infusion on days 1 and 2. Chemotherapy was repeated every 14 days.

Results

Between October 2008 and September 2011, fifty-six patients, with a median age of 59 years, were enrolled in this study. The overall response rate was 23.2 % with a disease control rate of 67.9 %. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.4 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 7.7 months. Median PFS was significantly longer in patients without liver metastasis than those with liver metastasis (5.4 vs 2.4 months, P = 0.003). Partial response was associated with longer PFS (7.2 vs 2.7 months, P = 0.023) and OS (11.3 vs 7.1 months, P = 0.028). Significant difference in OS was noted between those age >65 and ≤65 years of age (7.9 vs 3.3 months, P = 0.033). Grade 3/4 neutropenia, leucopenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 35.7, 28.6, 10.7 and 10.7 % of patients, respectively. The most common non-hematologic toxicities were fatigue, mucositis, nausea/vomiting and peripheral neuropathy, all of which were moderate, reversible and did not require a dose reduction.

Conclusions

Chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, leucovorin and fluorouracil showed moderate antitumor activity in metastatic ESCC and was well tolerated with acceptable myelosuppression, infrequent and reversible non-hematologic toxicities in patients with ESCC.     

A phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin in combination with gemcitabine in carcinoma of unknown primary

Background

Preclinical and clinical data suggest synergy for gemcitabine and oxaliplatin. These agents were tested in several known cancers that also comprise the common carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) subtypes; namely, lung and pancreaticobiliary profiles.

Methods

The study enrolled 29 patients of whom 28 patients were eligible for treatment. Gemcitabine was given at 1,000 mg/m² as a fixed dose rate infusion and oxaliplatin was infused at 100 mg/m² every 2 weeks with restaging performed after 3 cycles at 6 weeks.

Results

The study reported one complete response (CR) (4%), 6 patients with a partial response (PR) (25%), and 13 with stable disease (SD) (54%); and 4 patients had progressive disease (PD) (17%) on restaging. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were 12.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.5–18.5) and 3.1 months (95% CI 1.7–6), respectively. The 1-year OS was 54%. The most common grade 3 toxicities were nausea (22%), vomiting (15%), and fatigue (11%). There were no grade 4 toxicities. This study was closed early as we moved from an empiric therapy platform to a more individualized approach.

Conclusions

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin is a well-tolerated regimen in CUP with similar outcomes to previously documented CUP studies. In selected good performance status patients this combination may serve as a first-line doublet chemotherapy option for CUP patients (clinicaltrials.gov ID:NCT00353145).     

Combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil for patients with advanced and metastatic gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a multicenter prospective study

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination regimen of paclitaxel,cisplatin and 5-FU(PCF) as first-line or second-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric and esophagogastric junction(EGJ) adenocarcinoma in China.Methods:The patients were treated with paclitaxel 150mg/m2 on d1;fractionated cisplatin 15mg/m 2 and continuous infusion 5-FU 600mg/(m2·d) intravenously on d1-d5 of a 21-d cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities.Results:Seventy-five patients have been enrolled,among which,41 received PCF regimen as the first-line therapy(group A) and 34 received the regimen as the second-line therapy(group B) with the median age of 59 years old and Karnofsky performance status(KPS) score ≥80.Toxicities were analyzed in all 75 patients.Seventy-one patients were evaluable for efficacy.The median overall survival(mOS) was 12.0 months(95% CI:7.9-16.2 months) in group A and 7.3 months(95% CI:4.3-10.3 months) in group B,respectively.The median progression-free survival(mPFS) was 5.7 months(95% CI:4.1-7.2 months) and 5.0 months(95% CI:3.1-6.9 months),respectively.The response rate(CR+PR) was 40%(16/40;95% CI:24.9-56.7%) in group A and 22.6%(7/31;95% CI:9.6-41.1%) in group B.Major grade 3 or 4 adverse events include neutropenia(41.3%),febrile neutropenia(9.3%),nausea/anorexia(10.7%),and vomiting(5.3%).There was no treatment-related death.Conclusions:The combination chemotherapy with PCF is active and tolerable as first-line and secondline therapy in Chinese patients with advanced gastric and EGJ adenocarcinoma.The response and survival of PCF are same as those of DCF,but the tolerance is much better.