Between and within subject variation of the first phase insulin response to intravenous glucose

Summary Eight normal subjects underwent two intravenous glucose tolerance tests to determine the between and within subject variation of the first phase insulin response. Variability was represented by the coefficient of variation. The between subject variation for the incremental 0–10 min insulin area was 58%, and the within subject variation was 22% (median value), range 3–55%. The variation of the first phase response expressed in four different ways was compared. The total and incremental (above fasting levels) 0–10 min areas provided less variable results (variation 52 and 58%) than the 1+3 min insulin levels (variation 72%) or mean of the incremental 3–5 min insulin levels (variation 66%). The ratio of the incremental 0–10 min insulin to glucose areas was as variable (variation 53%) as the insulin responses alone. The variability of insulin responses to intravenous glucose severely limits their value as early predictors of B-cell failure.     

Early and late insulin response as predictors of NIDDM in Pima Indians with impaired glucose tolerance

Summary Risk factors predicting deterioration to diabetes mellitus were examined in 181 subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. Fifty-seven subjects had impaired glucose tolerance on one occasion followed by normal glucose tolerance at a repeat oral glucose tolerance test, and 124 subjects had impaired glucose tolerance on two successive oral glucose tolerance tests. Subjects were followed for a median period of 5.0 years (range 1.0–17.2). The age- and sex-adjusted cumulative incidence of diabetes at 10 years of follow-up was higher in subjects who had impaired glucose tolerance on both tests (70%) than in those whose glucose tolerance was normal at the repeat test (53%), [rate ratio (RR)=1.6, 95% confidence intervals (CI)=1.0–2.5]. Proportional hazards analyses were used to identify baseline risk factors (measured at the repeat oral glucose tolerance test) for subsequent diabetes, and incidence rate ratios were calculated for the 90th percentile compared with the 10th percentile of each continuous variable for the whole group. In all subjects, in separate models, higher body mass index [RR=2.0, 95% CI=2.2–9.9], high fasting serum insulin concentrations [RR=2.4, 95% CI=1.4–4.2], and low early insulin response [RR=0.5, 95% CI=0.3–0.8] 30 min after a glucose load were significant predictors for deterioration to diabetes. In a multivariate analysis which controlled for age and sex, 120-min post-load glucose, fasting insulin and late insulin response predicted diabetes. In subgroup analyses the predictors of diabetes were generally similar in subjects who had impaired glucose tolerance at only one test and those who had impaired glucose tolerance on both tests. These findings suggest that in those subjects with impaired glucose tolerance whose glucose tolerance has returned to normal, the risk of subsequent diabetes is high. Insulin resistance, impaired early insulin response, or both, are predictive of subsequent development of diabetes in Pima Indians with impaired glucose tolerance.Abbreviations IGT Impaired glucose tolerance - OGTT oral glucose tolerance test - NGT normal glucose tolerance - CV coefficient of variation     

Peripheral and hepatic insulin sensitivity in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance

Summary Recent evidence suggests that the post-prandial hyperglycaemia in impaired glucose tolerance is primarily due to impaired suppression of basal hepatic glucose output. This in turn appears to be secondary to decreased first phase insulin secretion, although decreased hepatic insulin sensitivity, which is a feature of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, might also play a role. Eight mildly overweight subjects with impaired glucose tolerance and eight closely matched control subjects with normal glucose tolerance underwent an intravenous glucose tolerance test to assess first phase insulin secretion. Insulin sensitivity was examined by a 150-min hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp. Somatostatin was infused from 150 min to suppress endogenous insulin secretion, and glucagon and insulin were replaced by constant infusion. Glucose with added dideuterated glucose (labelled infusion technique) was infused to maintain euglycaemia. First phase insulin secretion ( 0–10 min insulin area ÷ 0–10 min glucose area) was significantly decreased in the subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (median [range]: 1.2 [0.2–19.4] vs 9.1 [2.6–14.5] mU·mmol^–1; p<0.01). During the clamp, circulating insulin (93±8 [mean±SEM] and 81±10 mU·l^–1) and glucagon (54±4 and 44±6 ng·l^–1) levels were comparable. Total glucose disposal was decreased in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (2.78±0.27 vs 4.47±0.53 mg·kg^–1·min^–1; p<0.02), and was primarily due to decreased non-oxidative glucose disposal. However, hepatic glucose output rates were comparable during the clamp (0.38±0.10 and 0.30±0.18 mg·kg^–1·min^–1). Therefore, the main defects in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance are decreased first phase insulin secretion and peripheral non-oxidative glucose disposal, but hepatic glucose output shows normal responsiveness to insulin.Abbreviations FPIS First phase insulin secretion - PG plasma glucose - NIDDM non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus - IGT impaired glucose tolerance - HGO hepatic glucose output - IVGTT intravenous glucose tolerance test - OGTT oral glucose tolerance test     

Loss of regular oscillatory insulin secretion in islet cell antibody positive non-diabetic subjects

Summary Basal insulin secretion was compared in nine islet-cell antibody positive, non-diabetic first-degree relatives of children with Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and nine normal control subjects matched for age, sex and weight. Acute insulin responses to a 25 g intravenous glucose tolerance test were similar in the two groups (243 (198–229) vs 329 (285–380) mU·l^–1·10min^–1, mean (±SE), p=0.25). Fasting plasma insulin was assayed in venous samples taken at one min intervals for 2 h. Time series analysis was used to demonstrate oscillatory patterns in plasma insulin. Autocorrelation showed that regular oscillatory activity was generally absent in the islet-cell antibody positive group, whereas a regular 13 min cycle was shown in control subjects (p< 0.0001). Fourier transformation did, however, show a 13 min spectral peak in the islet-cell antibody positive group, consistent with intermittent pulsatility. We conclude that overall oscillatory patters of basal insulin secretion are altered in islet-cell antibody positive subjects even when the acute insulin response is within the normal range.     

Intra-individual variation of glucose,specific insulin and proinsulin concentrations measured by two oral glucose tolerance tests in a general Caucasian population: the Hoorn Study

Summary We studied the intra-individual variation in plasma glucose, specific serum insulin and serum pro-insulin concentrations, measured by two 75-g oral glucose tolerance tests in an age, sex, and glucose tolerance stratified random sample from a 50–74-year-old Caucasian population without a history of diabetes mellitus. The intra-individual variation was assessed by the standard deviation of the test-retest differences (SD_dif). For subjects with normal (n=246), impaired glucose tolerance (n=198), and newly detected diabetes (n=80) classified at the first test, the following (SD_dif/median level of individual average scores) were found: fasting glucose: 0.4/5.4, 0.5/5.9 and 0.7/7.2 mmol/l; 2-h glucose: 1.3/5.6, 1.8/8.5 and 2.3/12.8 mmol/l; fasting insulin: 23/76, 32/89 and 30/ 116 pmol/l; 2-h insulin: 190/303, 278/553 and 304/626 pmol/l; fasting proinsulin: 4/8, 6/13 and 9/18 pmol/l; 2-h proinsulin: 19/49, 23/84 and 33/90 pmol/l, respectively. In both glucose, proinsulin and insulin concentrations the total intra-individual variation was predominantly determined by biological variation, whereas analytical variation made only a minor contribution. The SD_dif can easily be interpreted, as 95% of the random test-retest differences will be less than 2 · SD_dif, or in terms of percentage, less than (2 · SD_dif/median level of individual average scores) · 100. Therefore, for subjects with normal glucose tolerance, 95% of the random test-retest differences will be less than 15% (fasting glucose), 46% (2-h glucose), 61% (fasting insulin), 125% (2-h insulin), 100% (fasting proinsulin) and 78% (2-h proinsulin) of the median value of the individual average scores. No substantial independent association of either age, gender or obesity with the intra-individual variation in glucose, proinsulin, or insulin concentrations was found.Abbreviations OGTT Oral glucose tolerance test - NGT_1st, IGT_1st new DM_1st normal glucose tolerance, impaired glucose tolerance and newly detected diabetes mellitus, respectively, as classified at first OGTT - SD_dif standard deviation of the difference scores - CV_intra intra-individual coefficient of variation - CV_bi biological intra-individual coefficient of variation - CV_a analytical intra-individual coefficient of variation - Cl₉₅ 95% confidence interval     

Glipizide versus tolbutamide,an open trial

Summary An open parallel trial with glipizide or tolbutamide was carried out in a cohort of 29 comparable maturity-onset diabetic patients. Eighteen of these individuals were studied in detail. During six months of active drug therapy the mean decrease in fasting serum glucose levels on glipizide was 25 ±2% versus 17±2% on tolbutamide (p<0.025). Decreases in post prandial glucose levels were 12.2 and 10.4%. Glucose disappearance rates (Kg) during the sixth month of treatment with both drugs increased significantly: on glipizide from 0.47±0.04%/min to 0.85±0.08%/min (p<0.005), and on tolbutamide from 0.47±0.08%/min to 0.70±0.11%/min (p<0.01). Early and late insulin release (summed increases over basal for 2–10 min and 10–60 min) during intravenous glucose tolerance testing increased during glipizide, but not during tolbutamide therapy. Post prandial insulin increments over basal during an oral glucose tolerance test also increased during glipizide, but not tolbutamide therapy. Both drugs were comparable with regard to efficacy and safety; however, only glipizide had chronic effects upon insulin secretion.     

Measurement of glucose metabolism and insulin secretion during normal pregnancy and pregnancy complicated by gestational diabetes

Summary Gestational diabetes affects 2–3% of pregnant women and is associated with foetal complications including macrosomia and an increased likelihood of developing diabetes in later life. We have therefore studied seven women with gestational diabetes and five control women both during the third trimester of pregnancy and again 2–3 months post-partum, using the minimal model analysis of the frequently sampled labelled ([6, 6-²H₂]-glucose) intravenous glucose tolerance test. Glucose tolerance (glucose K_d) was significantly reduced in the women with gestational diabetes compared with the normal pregnant women both in pregnancy (1.16±0.11 vs 1.78±0.23%/min; p<0.05) and post-partum (1.47±0.22 vs 2.59±0.43%/min; p<0.05) and increased significantly in the control women after delivery (p<0.05). Glucose effectiveness was not significantly different between the women with gestational diabetes and the control group either during or after pregnancy. Insulin sensitivity was significantly lower during pregnancy than after delivery in the women with gestational diabetes (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in basal insulin secretion in the two groups during pregnancy or post-partum. However, during pregnancy the control subjects significantly increased (p<0.001) their insulin secretion over a period of 20 min in response to an intravenous glucose tolerance test (96.2±42.7 pmol/kg) compared with post-partum values (58.3±25.2 pmol/kg) while in the women with gestational diabetes insulin secretion was similar in pregnancy (65.5±9.3 pmol/kg) and after delivery (57.7±15.7 pmol/kg). These data suggest that the glucose intolerance in gestational diabetes compared to normal pregnancy is due to reduced insulin sensitivity and an impaired ability in gestational diabetes to increase insulin secretion in response to glucose.Abbreviations BMI Body mass index - GCMS gas chromatography mass spectrometry - GDM gestational diabetes mellitus - HOMA homeostasis model assessment - IVGTT intravenous glucose tolerance test - OGTT oral glucose tolerance test - Sab above basal insulin secretion - Sb basal insulin secretion - K_d glucose disappearance - CV coefficient of variation - AIR_glucose acute insulin response to glucose - SI insulin sensitivity index - SG glucose effectiveness     

Evaluation of insulin resistance during inhibition of endogenous insulin and glucagon secretion by somatostatin in non-obese subjects with impaired glucose tolerance

Summary Insulin resistance was studied in seven non-obese male subjects with impaired glucose tolerance and four healthy, age and body-weight matched male control subjects by means of a continuous intravenous infusion of somatostatin, glucose and insulin over 150 min. Glucose tolerance was evaluated by means of a 2-h glucose infusion test. Endogenous insulin (C-peptide), growth hormone, and glucagon secretion were suppressed by somatostatin in both groups. Steady-state plasma insulin and glucose levels were achieved between 90–135 min. Since similar steady-state levels of exogenous insulin were achieved, the resulting steady-state plasma glucose level provided a direct estimate of the ability of insulin to dispose of the infused glucose. The glucose levels were higher in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance with values of 14.6 ± 1.8 mmol/1 compared with 5.1 ± 1.2 mmol/1 in control subjects (p < 0.01), thus indicating insulin resistance. There was a direct correlation between the steady-state plasma glucose level and glucose tolerance suggesting that the degree of glucose intolerance is proportional to the degree of insulin resistance. These results revealed that decreased insulin sensitivity is found in non-obese subjects with impaired glucose tolerance.     

Nicotinamide and insulin secretion in normal subjects

Summary Nicotinamide has been given both before and after clinical onset of Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in an attempt to prolong beta-cell survival. Nicotinic acid, structurally similar to nicotinamide, induces insulin resistance and increases insulin secretion in healthy individuals. It is not known if nicotinamide has similar effects. Since insulin secretion, as measured by the acute insulin response to intravenous glucose, is used to predict diabetes and to monitor therapy, the effects of nicotinamide must be established before trials in individuals at high risk of progression to Type 1 diabetes can be interpreted. Intravenous tolerance tests were performed according to the ICARUS standard protocol in 10 healthy, adult subjects (age 32±5.7 years) before and after 14 days of treatment with nicotinamide 25 mg · kg^–1 · day^–1. The acute insulin response after nicotinamide did not differ from the control study, whether measured as the incremental 0–10 min insulin area (278±142 vs 298±130mU · l^–1 · 10 min^–1) or as the 1±3 min insulin level (78±39 vs 81±44 mU/l). The late insulin response was equally unaffected, as were basal insulin (5.2±1.6 vs 5.6±2.1 mU/l) and glucose (5.0±0.4 vs 4.9±0.2 mmol/l) levels and glucose disposal rates (1.98±0.88 vs 2.04±0.68%/min). Nicotinamide does not affect insulin secretion and glucose kinetics in normal subjects, confirming its suitability for trials designed to delay or prevent the onset of Type 1 diabetes.     

Predominant role of reduced beta-cell sensitivity to glucose over insulin resistance in impaired glucose tolerance

Aims/hypothesis Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) is an insulin-resistant state and a risk factor for Type 2 diabetes. The relative roles of insulin resistance and insulin deficiency in IGT have been disputed.Methods In 40 IGT subjects and 63 sex-, age-, and weight-matched controls with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), we measured (i) indices of insulin sensitivity of fasting glucose production (by tracer glucose) and glucose disposal (M value on a 240 pmol·min^–1·m^–2 insulin clamp) and (ii) indices of beta-cell function (glucose sensitivity, rate sensitivity, and potentiation) derived from model analysis (Am J Physiol 283:E1159–E1166, 2002) of the insulin secretory response (by C-peptide deconvolution) to oral glucose.Results In comparison with NGT, IGT were modestly insulin resistant (M=29±2 vs 35±2 µmol·min^–1·kg_FFM^–1, p=0.01); insulin sensitivity of glucose production also was reduced, in approximate proportion to M. Despite higher baseline insulin secretion rates, IGT was characterized by a 50% reduction in glucose sensitivity [53 (36) vs 102 (123) pmol·min^–1·m^–2·mM^–1, median (interquartile range), p=0.001] and impaired potentiation [1.6 (0.8) vs 2.0 (1.5) units, p<0.04] of insulin release, whereas rate sensitivity [1.15 (1.15) vs 1.38 (1.28) nmol·m^–2·mM^–1] was not significantly reduced. Glucose sensitivity made the single largest contribution (~50%) to the observed variability of glucose tolerance.Conclusion/interpretation In IGT the defect in glucose sensitivity of insulin release quantitatively predominates over insulin resistance in the genesis of the reduced tolerance to oral glucose.     

The effects of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide infused at physiological concentrations in normal subjects and Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients on glucose tolerance and B-cell secretion

Summary The effects of porcine glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide given by continuous intravenous infusion in normal subjects (n=6) and Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients (n=6) have been investigated. The subjects were studied on 2 separate days after overnight fasts. On each day 25 g of glucose was infused from 0–30 min plus an infusion of either porcine glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (0.75 pmol·kg^–1·min^–1) or control solution. During the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide infusion plasma glucose values were reduced in normal subjects from 30–60 min (p<0.01) and in Type 2 diabetic patients at 45 and 60 min (p<0.05). In the normal subjects insulin concentrations were greater from 10–35 min (p<0.01) following glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide infusion and peak values were increased by 123%. In the Type 2 diabetic patients following glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide infusion insulin levels were increased from 4–40 min (p<0.01) but peak values were only increased by 27%. In the normal subjects C-peptide values were greater from 25–45 min (p<0.01) following glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide infusion and peak C-peptide levels were increased by 82%. In the Type 2 diabetic patients following the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide infusion C-peptide levels were increased from 6–55 min (p<0.01) and peak values were increased by 20%. Plasma glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide levels were within the physiological post prandial range during the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide infusion. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide is insulinotropic in normal subjects and Type 2 diabetic patients at physiological concentrations and results in improved glucose tolerance. This insulinotropic effect is less marked in the diabetic patients and may represent insensitivity of the B cell to glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide.     

Derivation of a quantitative measure of insulin sensitivity from the intravenous tolbutamide test using the minimal model of glucose dynamics

Summary Using the decay phase of the glucose response during an intravenous tolbutamide test, a minimal model of glucose dynamics was used to calculate a value for an index of insulin sensitivity. This index describes the efficiency of insulin in accelerating the instantaneous rate of glucose disposal, and provides a measure of insulin resistance. The validity of estimates of the index of insulin sensitivity obtained from the intravenous tolbutamide test have been assessed with reference to estimates of this index derived from the intravenous glucose tolerance test for which the model was originally designed. There were three studies: (A) estimates of the index of insulin sensitivity obtained from the intravenous tolbutamide test in a group of normal, healthy men and women were compared with results obtained in a comparable group of subjects using the intravenous glucose tolerance test. The two methods gave estimates of the index of insulin sensitivity that were identical; (B) A group of patients taking methandienone, an anabolic steroid previously shown to cause marked insulin resistance, were tested whilst taking the steroid and either before, or at least two months after treatment. Each patient was tested by both intravenous tolbutamide test and intravenous glucose tolerance test on both occasions. Estimates of the index of insulin sensitivity from intravenous glucose tolerance or intravenous tolbutamide procedures both on and off treatment were significantly correlated (off treatment: r _s ,= 0.71, n=9, p<0.05; on treatment: r _s =0.69, n=9, p<0.05); (C) A group of patients undergoing investigations for suspected disturbances in carbohydrate metabolism was studied, each patient having had both an intravenous tolbutamide and intravenous glucose tolerance test. The group studied included patients in whom a degree of insulin resistance would be expected. Estimates of the index of insulin sensitivity from the two methods were closely correlated (r _s =0.95, n=25, p<0.001). This strong, identical correlation obtained between the intravenous glucose tolerance and intravenous tolbutamide tolerance estimates of index of insulin sensitivity in studies B and C over a wide range of values [intravenous tolbutamide tolerance test: 0.11–1.07 min^–1U^–1 1; intravenous glucose tolerance test: 0.12-1.06 min^–1U^–11]. This suggests that the intravenous tolbutamide estimates of index of insulin sensitivity are closely comparable to those derived from intravenous glucose tolerance test over a broad range of insulin sensitivities. We suggest that the use of intravenous tolbutamide to induce a dynamic change in insulin-glucose relationships, and mathematical modelling of those dynamics, can provide a valuable, quantitative measure of insulin sensitivity in a variety of clinical situations.     

Variability in Estimated Modelled Insulin Secretion

Background:The ability to measure insulin secretion from pancreatic beta cells and monitor glucose-insulin physiology is vital to current health needs. C-peptide has been used successfully as a surrogate for plasma insulin concentration. Quantifying the expected variability of modelled insulin secretion will improve confidence in model estimates.Methods:Forty-three healthy adult males of Māori or Pacific peoples ancestry living in New Zealand participated in an frequently sampled, intravenous glucose tolerance test (FS-IVGTT) with an average age of 29 years and a BMI of 33 kg/m². A 2-compartment model framework and standardized kinetic parameters were used to estimate endogenous pancreatic insulin secretion from plasma C-peptide measurements. Monte Carlo analysis (N = 10 000) was then used to independently vary parameters within ±2 standard deviations of the mean of each variable and the 5th and 95th percentiles determined the bounds of the expected range of insulin secretion. Cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) were calculated for each subject for area under the curve (AUC) total, AUC Phase 1, and AUC Phase 2. Normalizing each AUC by the participant’s median value over all N = 10 000 iterations quantifies the expected model-based variability in AUC.Results:Larger variation is found in subjects with a BMI > 30 kg/m², where the interquartile range is 34.3% compared to subjects with a BMI ≤ 30 kg/m² where the interquartile range is 24.7%.Conclusions:Use of C-peptide measurements using a 2-compartment model and standardized kinetic parameters, one can expect ~±15% variation in modelled insulin secretion estimates. The variation should be considered when applying this insulin secretion estimation method to clinical diagnostic thresholds and interpretation of model-based analyses such as insulin sensitivity.     

Preserved insulin response to tolbutamide in hepatocyte nuclear factor-1alpha mutation carriers.

AIMS: Diabetic subjects with mutations in the gene encoding hepatocyte nuclear factor (HNF)-1alpha (MODY3) are prone to develop hypoglycaemia at low doses of glibenclamide, interpreted as sulphonylurea hypersensitivity. The present study was undertaken to compare the plasma insulin responses to glucose and tolbutamide in HNF-1alpha mutation carriers with those of healthy control subjects. METHODS: Seven mutation carriers; three normoglycaemic, two with impaired glucose tolerance, and two with newly detected diabetes, underwent an oral glucose tolerance test and a tolbutamide-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test with measurements of plasma insulin. Twenty-two healthy subjects served as controls. RESULTS: The plasma insulin response to intravenous glucose was reduced in the HNF-1alpha mutation carriers compared to the control subjects, with an area under the curve (median (interquartile range)) of 812 min pmol/l (421, 1647) and 1933 min pmol/l (1521, 2908), respectively (P = 0.03). In striking contrast, the plasma insulin response to tolbutamide was preserved, with an area under the curve of 2109 min pmol/l (1126, 3172) and 2250 min pmol/l (1614, 3276) in the mutation carriers and control subjects, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HNF-1alpha mutation carriers are characterized by preserved tolbutamide-induced insulin secretion. Compared to healthy subjects, our MODY3 individuals did not show any increased serum insulin response to tolbutamide, suggesting that HNF-1alpha mutation carriers are not characterized by sulphonylurea hypersensitivity.     

Insulin delivery rate in response to glucose and arginine infusion in hyperthyroidism

Summary Insulin delivery rates were estimated from the peripheral serum insulin response to a single bolus injection of glucose or arginine in eight normal subjects and eight patients with hyperthyroidism. The mean rate constant for insulin disappearance was 0.2380±0.0052 per min in the control subjects, which was not significantly different from that observed in the patients with hyperthyroidism (0.2147±0.0111 per min). There were also no significant differences in the insulin response to glucose infusion (1.7±0.3 U during the first phase (0–10 min) and 5.6±1.6 U during the second phase (11–60 min) in normal subjects compared with 1.2±0.5 and 3.7±1.1 U respectively in the hyperthyroid patients). The delivered insulin in response to glucose infusion was similar in the two groups. The kg-value in the patients with hyperthyroidism was lower than that in the control subjects (1.24±0.11 versus 2.11±0.22;p < 0.005). In hyperthyroidism, the low kg-value was not a result of the diminished insulin delivery to the general circulation. Insulin delivery showed a monophasic pattern following arginine infusion in both patients and control subjects. For the control subjects, the amount of insulin delivered was estimated to be 0.53±0.12 U during the first 10 min and 0.37±0.14 U during 11–30 min. In hyperthyroidism, the amount of insulin delivered was significantly lower than in the control subjects (0.21±0.06 U during the first 10 min and 0.07±0.03 U during 11–30 min). In the control subjects, the plasma glucose level was raised transiently following arginine infusion, but in hyperthyroidism, there was no change in plasma glucose levels. In hyperthyroidism, therefore, glucose intolerance appears to be primarily related to an antagonism of the hepatic effect of insulin by thyroxine rather than an inhibitory effect of thyroxine on insulin secretion. However, since delivery rate represents the measurement of peripheral serum insulin concentrations, these results cannot exclude an abnormality of hepatic insulin metabolism in hyperthyroidism.     

Fasting proinsulin and 2-h post-load glucose levels predict the conversion to NIDDM in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance: The Hoorn Study

Summary The aims of the present study were to observe the natural history of impaired glucose tolerance and to identify predictors for development of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). A survey of glucose tolerance was conducted in subjects aged 50–74 years, randomly selected from the registry of the middle-sized town of Hoorn in the Netherlands. Based on the mean values of two oral glucose tolerance tests subjects were classified in categories of glucose tolerance according to the World Health Organization criteria. All subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (n=224) were invited to participate in the present study, in which 70% (n=158) were subsequently enrolled. During follow-up subjects underwent a repeated paired oral glucose tolerance test. The mean follow-up time was 24 months (range 12–36 months). The cumulative incidence of NIDDM was 28.5% (95% confidence interval 15–42%). Age, sex, and anthropometric and metabolic characteristics at baseline were analysed simultaneously as potential predictors of conversion to NIDDM using multiple logistic regression. The initial 2-h post-load plasma glucose levels and the fasting proinsulin levels were significantly (p<0.05) related to the incidence of NIDDM. Anthropometric characteristics, the 2-h post-load specific insulin levels and the fasting proinsulin/fasting insulin ratio were not related to the incidence of NIDDM. These results suggest that beta-cell dysfunction rather than insulin resistance plays the most important role in the future development of diabetes in a high-risk Caucasian population.Abbreviations IGT Impaired glucose tolerance - NIDDM non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus - OGTT oral glucose tolerance test - CI confidence interval - W/H ratio waist/hip ratio - BMI body mass index - OR odds ratio     

The effect of intraportal and peripheral infusions of glucagon on insulin and glucose concentrations and glucose tolerance in normal man

Summary The effect of peripheral and intraportal infusions of 0.86 pmol/kg · min^–1 of glucagon on plasma glucose, plasma insulin, and glucose tolerance was examined in four normal subjects. Peripheral glucagon concentrations increased by 60–90 pmol/l during intraportal and 70–180 pmol/l during peripheral infusions. The infusions caused increases in plasma glucose levels of approximately 1 mmol/l, and in plasma insulin levels of 75–100%, regardless of route of administration. Intravenous glucose tolerance tests carried out during the glucagon infusions showed that glucose tolerance remained within the normal range and was uninfluenced by the route of administration.     

Insulin sensitivity,insulin secretion and glucose effectiveness in diabetic and non-diabetic cirrhotic patients

Summary In cirrhotic patients with normal fasting glucose levels both insulin insensitivity and a blunted early insulin response to oral glucose are important determinants of the degree of intolerance to oral glucose. It is not known whether the ability of hyperglycaemia per se to enhance glucose disposal (glucose effectiveness) is also impaired. It is also unclear whether overt diabetes is due to (1) more marked insulin insensitivity; (2) impaired insulin secretion; (3) reduced glucose effectiveness; or (4) a combination of these mechanisms. We used the minimal model to analyse the results of a 3-h intravenous glucose tolerance test to assess glucose effectiveness, insulin sensitivity and insulin responses in 12 non-diabetic cirrhotic patients, 8 diabetic cirrhotic patients and 10 normal control subjects. Fasting blood glucose levels were 4.8±0.2, 7.5±0.6 and 4.7±0.1 mmol/l, respectively. Fasting insulin and C-peptide levels were higher in both cirrhotic patient groups compared with control subjects. The glucose clearance between 6 and 19 min after i.v. glucose was lower in both cirrhotic groups (non-diabetic, 1.56±0.14, diabetic, 0.76±0.06, control subjects, 2.49±0.16 min^–1%, both p<0.001 vs control subjects). Serum insulin peaked at 3 and 23 min in the non-diabetic cirrhotic patients and control subjects; both peaks were higher in the non-diabetic cirrhotic patients and showed a delayed return to basal levels. In the diabetic cirrhotic patients, the first phase insulin and C-peptide response to i.v. glucose was absent; their early (22–27 min) incremental insulin response to i. v. tolbutamide was however similar to that of control subjects but 43% lower than in the non-diabetic cirrhotic patients (p<0.05). Insulin sensitivity was markedly reduced in both cirrhotic groups (non-diabetic, 1.11±0.24×10^–4, diabetic, 0.33±0.53×10^–4, control subjects, 4.37±0.53×10^–4 min^–1 per mU·l^–1, both p<0.001 vs controls). Glucose effectiveness was normal in the non-diabetic cirrhotic patients but 29% lower in the diabetic group. It would appear that overt diabetes develops in those cirrhotic patients who in addition to insulin insensitivity have a marked impairment of insulin secretion. An associated reduction in glucose effectiveness may be a contributory factor.     

Relationship between glucose tolerance,insulin secretion,and insulin action in non-obese individuals with varying degrees of glucose tolerance

Summary Plasma glucose and insulin concentration following a 75 g oral glucose challenge and glucose uptake during a hyperinsulinaemic glucose clamp study were determined in 50 non-obese individuals. The study population was divided into five groups on the basis of their glucose tolerance: normal, impaired glucose tolerance, Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus with fasting plasma glucose of less than 8 mmol/l, between 8–15 mmol/l, and more than 15 mmol/l. The plasma insulin response was significantly greater (p<0.001) than normal in those with either impaired glucose tolerance or Type 2 diabetes and a fasting plasma glucose concentration less than 8 mmol/l. In contrast, the plasma insulin response was similar to normal in the other two groups of patients with Type 2 diabetes, i.e. fasting plasma glucose concentration 8–15 mmol/l or greater than 15 mmol/l. Glucose uptake rates were significantly lower (p<0.001) than normal in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance and all three groups of patients with Type 2 diabetes. Although glucose uptake rates during the glucose clamp studies were relatively similar in all four groups of glucose intolerant subjects, the values were significantly lower in those patients with Type 2 diabetes who had a fasting plasma glucose concentration greater than 8 mmol/l (p<0.01), These data indicate that a significant degree of insulin resistance exists in patients with impaired glucose tolerance or Type 2 diabetes, relatively independent of fasting plasma glucose concentration. Indeed, glucose uptake during glucose clamp studies fell 8-fold over a range in fasting plasma glucose concentration of from 4.5 to 6.5 mmol/l. In contrast, the plasma insulin response increased over the same range of fasting plasma glucose concentrations. The fact that this defect in insulin action can be seen in patients who are hyperinsulinaemic, not hypoinsulinaemic, and only modestly hyperglycaemic, is consistent with the hypothesis that resistance to insulin-stimulate glucose uptake is a basic characteristic of patients with impaired glucose tolerance or Type 2 diabetes.     

Poor physical fitness,and impaired early insulin response but late hyperinsulinaemia,as predictors of NIDDM in middle-aged Swedish men

Summary In a prospective population-based study of middle-aged Caucasian men, performed in Malmö, Sweden, specifically designed to evaluate physical fitness, early and late insulin response as predictors of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), 4,637 non-diabetic men underwent oral glucose tolerance tests at the ages of 48 and 54 years. At the baseline examination, physical fitness was measured in terms of lung vital capacity and oxygen uptake during ergometry; early insulin response in terms of the 40-min insulin increment during an oral glucose tolerance test (a correlate of acute insulin response to an intravenous glucose tolerance test), and late insulin response were measured in terms of the 2-h insulin value during the oral glucose tolerance test (a correlate of glucose disposal during euglycaemic clamp testing). Of the subjects studied 116 developed NIDDM (0.4% annually), and when compared with non-diabetic men at baseline, they were found to have an 11% higher mean body mass index (p<0.001), a higher frequency of family history of diabetes (31 vs 18%, p<0.001), 16% lower mean physical activity index (p<0.05), 16% lower mean estimated maximal oxygen uptake (p<0.001), 10% lower mean vital capacity (p<0.001), 26% lower 40-min to total insulin response ratio (p<0.001), and a 2.7 times higher mean 2-h insulin value during an oral glucose tolerance test (p<0.001). Regression analysis (using Cox's proportional hazards model) showed both low vital capacity, and impaired early insulin response but late hyperinsulinaemia to be independent predictors of NIDDM, in addition to body mass index and fasting blood glucose level (p=0.05–0.0001). Among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance at baseline (44 of 278 developed NIDDM), fasting glucose level alone predicted diabetes in this model. The findings suggest that in this age group in a Caucasian population, not only does insulin resistance precede glucose intolerance and NIDDM, but also loss of early insulin response indicating impaired beta-cell function to be an early feature of the process culminating in diabetes. As both physical fitness [which correlates inversely with late insulin response (r=–0.42, p<0.0001)], and the level of physical activity were shown to correlate with diabetes development in this large series, measures to correct these adverse features should be included in future strategies for preventing NIDDM.Abbreviations OGTT Oral glucose tolerance test - NGT normal glucose tolerance - IGT impaired glucose tolerance - NIDDM non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus - BMI body mass index - IVGTT intravenous glucose tolerance test