A comparison of the intubating laryngeal mask tracheal tube with a standard tracheal tube for fibreoptic intubation

We conducted a prospective randomised study to compare the intubating laryngeal mask tracheal tube with a standard tube, for ease of tracheal intubation over a fibrescope. Thirty-six patients were investigated, using a sequential analysis technique. Ease of intubation was improved when the intubating laryngeal mask tracheal tube was used compared with the standard tube (p = 0.0009). Median (interquartile range [range]) intubation times (time from the tube's tip being level with the patient's teeth to successful placement) were 1.5 (1-2.3 [1-3]) s when the intubating laryngeal mask tracheal tube was used and 5 (3-7.3 [3-13]) s when the standard tube was used (p < 0.0001).     

Nasal fibreoptic tracheal intubation in anaesthetised patients breathing via a modified laryngeal mask airway

A modified laryngeal mask airway was used to facilitate nasotracheal intubation with a fibreoptic laryngoscope. A size 4 laryngeal mask airway was modified by creating a defect at the base of the stem and removing the bars to allow passage of the fibreoptic laryngoscope from the nasopharynx to the larynx. The laryngeal mask airway cuff was split and the cut edges were sealed with silicone. This design allowed the cuff to function normally and allowed removal of the split laryngeal mask airway after the tracheal tube had been 'railroaded' into place. Thirty-four patients were studied. The split laryngeal mask airway was easily inserted with satisfactory airway maintenance in 32 patients. Nasal airway endoscopy and laryngoscopy were successfully achieved with the split laryngeal mask airway in place in 31 of 32 patients. Railroading the tracheal tube over the fibreoptic laryngoscope with the split laryngeal mask airway in place was successful in all 31 of these patients. This prototype split laryngeal mask airway allows good airway maintenance while fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation is performed.     

A comparison of laryngeal mask airway with tracheal tube for intra-ocular ophthalmic surgery

The use of the laryngeal mask was compared with tracheal intubation in 30 patients who underwent intra-ocular ophthalmic surgery and who received intravenous anaesthesia with propofol. Changes in intra-ocular pressure, heart rate and mean arterial pressure after the insertion of the laryngeal mask airway or the tracheal tube were not significantly different. However, at the end of the procedure, a significantly higher percentage of patients with a tracheal tube coughed, reacted to head movement and suffered breath-holding. In addition, significantly more patients in this group complained of a sore throat (p less than 0.05). During intravenous propofol anaesthesia, the laryngeal mask airway does not offer any advantage over tracheal intubation in the control of intra-ocular pressure for intra-ocular ophthalmic surgery. However, there were fewer complications immediately following surgery in the laryngeal mask group.     

Complications following the use of the Combitube, tracheal tube and laryngeal mask airway

In a prospective, randomised trial, 75 patients scheduled for routine surgery were randomly allocated to one of three groups to evaluate trauma and postoperative complications after insertion of the Combitube, tracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway. Insertion of the Combitube was associated with a higher incidence of sore throat (48% vs. 16% vs. 12% [p < 0.01]) and dysphagia (68% vs. 12% vs. 8% [p < 0.01]) compared with tracheal intubation or insertion of the laryngeal mask airway, respectively. Hoarseness was significantly less common in both the Combitube and the laryngeal mask groups (both 12%) than in the tracheal tube group (44%; p < 0.01). Haematoma occurred in 36% of the Combitube group compared with 4% in both the laryngeal mask and the tracheal tube groups (p < 0.01). The higher incidence of complications should be considered when using the Combitube.     

Effect of the size of a tracheal tube and the efficacy of the use of the laryngeal mask for fibrescope-aided tracheal intubation

We randomly allocated 60 patients with normal airways into three groups to compare the ease of fibrescope-aided tracheal intubation using 8.0-mm internal diameter (group F₈) and 6.0-mm (group F₆) reinforced tracheal tubes and to evaluate the efficacy of the laryngeal mask as an aid for fibreoptic tracheal intubation (group L). In group F₈ tracheal intubation was optimal in 2 of 20 patients and in two patients in whom intubation over the fibrescope was difficult the attempts resulted in inadvertent oesophageal intubation. In group F₆ intubation was always successful and significantly easier than in group F₈ (p < 0.005; 95% confidence interval for the difference in the proportion of the optimal intubation grade: 20–70%). In group L tracheal intubation was optimal in 18 of 20 patients and easier than in group F₆ (p = 0.014; 95% confidence interval for difference: 10–60%). In both groups F₆ and L tracheal intubation was completed within less than about 1 min. We conclude that conventional fibrescope-aided tracheal intubation with a 6.0-mm tracheal tube is easier than with an 8.0-mm tube and that the laryngeal mask facilitates fibrescope-aided tracheal intubation.     

Ease of tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask during manual in-line head and neck stabilisation

We studied 40 anaesthetised and paralysed patients, in a randomised manner, to compare the ease of tracheal intubation either using a Macintosh laryngoscope and gum elastic bougie (group C) with the ease of tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask using a fibreoptic bronchoscope (group L), during manual in-line stabilisation of the patient's head and neck. In both groups, a maximum of 120 s was allowed for attempts at tracheal intubation. The ease of placement of the intubating laryngeal mask or tracheal intubation was assessed using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). In patients in whom tracheal intubation succeeded, time for intubation was measured. The intubating laryngeal mask was placed successfully in 19 of 20 patients, with the median VAS of 18 mm (95% CI: 13-32 mm). The success rate of tracheal intubation in group L (17 patients) was significantly higher than in group C (nine patients) (p < 0.01), tracheal intubation in group L was significantly easier than intubation in group C (p < 0.001; 95% CI for difference in VAS: 18-68 mm) and time taken for tracheal intubation was significantly shorter in group L than in group C (95% CI for difference: 8-50 s).     

Intra-ocular pressure changes using the laryngeal mask airway and tracheal tube

Intra-ocular pressure was measured before and throughout airway establishment with either the laryngeal mask airway or tracheal tube. Similar measurements were made on removal of either airway and the amount of coughing noted in the first minute after removal. There was a significantly smaller increase in intra-ocular pressure (p less than 0.001) using the laryngeal mask airway, both on placement and removal, than with the tracheal tube. Postoperative coughing was significantly reduced using the laryngeal mask airway (p less than 0.001). There was a significantly greater rise in heart rate using the tracheal tube (p less than 0.01) probably related to an increased cardiovascular response. The laryngeal mask airway is recommended as an alternative to tracheal intubation in routine and emergency intra-ocular surgery.     

A comparison of blind and lightwand-guided tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask

We have tested the hypothesis that intubation success rates, haemodynamic changes, airway complications and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal morbidity differ between blind and lightwand-guided intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway. One hundred and twenty paralysed anasthetised adult patients (ASA I-II, no known or predicted difficult airways) were assigned in a random manner to one of two equal-sized groups. In the blind group, patients were intubated blindly through the intubating laryngeal mask airway. In the lightwand group, patients were intubated through the intubating laryngeal mask airway assisted by transillumination of the neck with a lightwand. A standard sequence of adjusting manoeuvres was followed if resistance occurred during intubation or if transillumination was incorrect. The number of adjusting manoeuvres, time to intubation, intubation success rates, haemodynamic changes (pre-induction, pre-intubation, postintubation), oesophageal intubation, mucosal trauma (blood detected), hypoxia (oxygen saturation < 95%) and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal morbidity (double-blinded) were documented. Overall intubation success was similar (blind, 93%; lightwand, 100%), but time to successful intubation was significantly shorter (67 vs. 46 s, p = 0. 027) and the number of adjusting manoeuvres was significantly fewer (p = 0.024) in the lightwand group. There were no significant differences in blood pressure or heart rate between the groups at any time. Oesophageal intubation occurred more frequently in the blind group (18 vs. 0%, p = 0.002). The incidence and severity of mucosal injury, sore throat and hoarseness were similar between the groups. We conclude that lightwand-guided intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask is superior to the blind technique.     

The Brain laryngeal mask airway An alternative to emergency tracheal intubation

The laryngeal mask airway was used to resuscitate a patient in whom direct and fibreoptic laryngoscopy were impossible because of cervical pathology and pulmonary oedema. The laryngeal mask airway may be an alternative to tracheal intubation in emergency resuscitation.     

A comparison of two silicone-reinforced tracheal tubes with different bevels for use with the intubating laryngeal mask

Seventy consecutive patients were randomly allocated for intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway using a straight reinforced silicone tracheal tube with either a conventional or a modified bevel. The conventional bevel was firm, wedge-shaped and with a leading edge at the side. The modified bevel was soft, hemispherical and with a leading edge in the midline. The intubating laryngeal mask position was adjusted until optimal ventilation was obtained and intubation was attempted using the randomised device. If tactile resistance was felt, a predetermined sequence of adjusting manoeuvres were utilised before a subsequent attempt. The first-attempt successful intubation rate with the conventional bevel was 23/37 (62%) and with the modified bevel was 28/33 (85%). The second-attempt successful intubation rate for the conventional bevel was 12/37 (32%) and for the modified bevel was 4/33 (12%). Intubation failed after three attempts for one patient in each group. Fewer overall intubation attempts were required with the modified bevel (p = 0.033). We conclude that intubation success rates through the intubating laryngeal mask with a straight silicone-reinforced tube are higher with a soft, hemispherical bevel with a leading edge in the midline compared with the firm, wedge-shaped bevel with a leading edge at the side.     

The intubating laryngeal mask Use in failed and difficult intubation

The use of the intubating laryngeal mask in three patients is described. In two patients for whom tracheal intubation using traditional techniques had failed, the intubating laryngeal mask was used to achieve successful tracheal intubation. The trachea of one of these patients was subsequently re-intubated for a second procedure using the same technique. A third patient with a cervical spine fracture whose trachea was electively intubated using the intubating laryngeal mask is also presented.     

Respiratory complications associated with tracheal extubationTiming of tracheal extubation and use of the laryngeal mask during emergence from anaesthesia

Sixty patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups and the incidences of respiratory complications which occurred during emergence from anaesthesia were compared under the following three circumstances: tracheal extubation after the patient had regained consciousness (awake group); tracheal extubation while the patient was still anaesthetised (anaesthetised group); and the use of the laryngeal mask during emergence from anaesthesia (mask group). In the mask group, the laryngeal mask was inserted under deep anaesthesia before tracheal extubation and the lungs were ventilated through the laryngeal mask after tracheal extubation. In the awake group, straining (bucking) occurred in 18 patients and desaturation (arterial oxygen haemoglobin saturation < 95%) in two patients. In the anaesthetised group, airway obstruction occurred in 17 patients and desaturation in one of these patients. In the mask group, ventilation through the laryngeal mask was temporarily difficult immediately after tracheal extubation in one patient and coughing occurred before removal of the mask in three patients. No respiratory complications occurred in two patients in the awake group, three patients in the anaesthetised group and 16 patients in the mask group. The incidence of respiratory complications during recovery from anaesthesia was significantly lower in the mask group than in the other two groups (pooled) (p << 0.001). Therefore, the use of the laryngeal mask after tracheal extubation decreases the incidence of respiratory complications during recovery from anaesthesia.     

The intubating laryngeal mask. Clinical appraisal of ventilation and blind tracheal intubation in 110 patients

This study assesses the efficacy of the intubating laryngeal mask as a ventilation device and blind intubation guide. Following induction of anaesthesia with propofol, the device was successfully inserted at the first attempt in 110/110 (100%) patients. Placement took less than 10 s in all patients. Size selection was based on nose-chin distance. Adequate ventilation was achieved in 104/110 (95%) patients. Blind tracheal intubation using an 8-mm internal diameter straight silicone cuffed tracheal tube was attempted 3 min after the administration of vecuronium. Passage of a lighted stylet through the intubating laryngeal mask was used to determine the position of the intubating laryngeal mask cuff before blind intubation. If resistance was felt during intubation, a sequence of adjusting manoeuvres was used, based on the depth at which resistance occurred. Tracheal intubation was possible in 104/104 (100%) patients. In 42 (40%) patients, no resistance was encountered and the trachea was intubated at the first attempt. Sixty-two (60%) patients required one adjusting manoeuvre. The mean (range) time taken to successful intubation, i.e. the time from disconnection of the intubating laryngeal mask from the breathing system to successful tracheal intubation, was 79 (12-315) s. Six patients with potential or known intubation problems were included in the study. The tracheas of all six patients were successfully intubated. We conclude that the intubating laryngeal mask is an effective ventilation device and intubation guide with potential for use in patients who may present difficulty in tracheal intubation.     

A cuff pressure controller for tracheal tubes and laryngeal mask airways

A simple device (U.K. Patent application no. 9907876.8) for fine adjustment of the cuff pressure of tracheal tubes and the laryngeal mask airway is described. In vitro tests confirm its efficiency. It is also a simple tool for training anaesthetic assistants in the operating theatre and nurses in the intensive care unit.     

Intubation through the laryngeal mask

Unexpected difficulty with tracheal intubation contributes to anaesthetic mortality. The laryngeal mask can almost always be placed satisfactorily and its position should facilitate blind intubation. A 6-mm cuffed tube will pass through both adult sizes of the mask and this study tested the feasibility of intubation through the mask. The effect of the application of cricoid pressure on the technique was also investigated. Intubation via the laryngeal mask was attempted in 100 routine patients: of the first 50 (group 1, no cricoid pressure), 45 (90%) were successfully intubated. Maintenance of cricoid pressure throughout the manoeuvre (group 2) reduced the success rate significantly to 56% (p less than 0.05). Despite the possibility that cricoid pressure may have to be interrupted momentarily, the ease with which the technique can be learnt, and the immediate availability of the necessary apparatus suggest that it should be considered for inclusion in failed intubation drill.     

Tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask in a patient with a fixed flexed neck and deviated larynx

Insertion of the conventional laryngeal mask is more difficult or impossible when the patient's head and neck are in either the neutral or flexed position. The intubating laryngeal mask is best inserted when the patient's head is supported by a pillow, without placing the head and neck into the Magill position; therefore, insertion of this modified mask may be less difficult than the conventional mask in the patient with a flexed neck. We report a case of successful insertion of the intubating laryngeal mask and subsequent tracheal intubation through the mask using a fibre-optic bronchoscope, in a patient with a flexed neck in whom tracheal intubation using several methods had been difficult previously.     

Electroencephalographic arousal response during tracheal intubation and laryngeal mask airway insertion after induction of anaesthesia with propofol

Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation, or insertion of a laryngeal mask airway may lead to an arousal response on the electroencephalogram. We studied whether more intense stimulation (laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation) causes a greater arousal response than less intense stimulation (laryngeal mask airway insertion). Thirty-four patients (ASA I-II) were anaesthetised with propofol 3 mg.kg-1, followed by vecuronium 0.15 mg.kg-1 and a propofol infusion of 10 mg.kg-1.h-1. Three minutes after induction of anaesthesia, either laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation (n = 18), or laryngeal mask airway insertion (n = 16) was performed. Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation caused a significantly greater increase in blood pressure (but not heart rate) than laryngeal mask airway insertion (p < 0.05). Electroencephalogram responses were not different. More intense stimulation does not cause a greater arousal response during propofol anaesthesia.     

The use of cricoid pressure with the intubating laryngeal mask

Unexpected difficulty with tracheal intubation contributes to anaesthetic morbidity and mortality. The intubating laryngeal mask is effective in facilitating blind intubation. We have evaluated the effect of cricoid pressure on the ability to insert an intubating laryngeal mask, and to pass a tracheal tube through it. Insertion and intubation through the mask were attempted in 50 patients, Mallampati grade 1-3, randomly allocated to cricoid and noncricoid pressure groups. Tracheal intubation was successful in 21 (84%) of the noncricoid group and 13 (52%) of the cricoid group (p = 0.03). Cricoid pressure may have to be released to allow correct placement and intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask.