Reproductive history and breast cancer risk

The fact that reproductive factors have significant influence on the risk of breast cancer is well known. Early age of first full-term birth is highly protective against late-onset breast cancers, but each pregnancy, including the first one, increases the risk of early-onset breast cancer. Estradiol and progesterone induce receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand (RANKL) in estrogen receptor (ER)- and progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive luminal cells. RANKL then acts in a paracrine fashion on the membranous RANK of ER/PgR-negative epithelial stem cells of the breast. This reaction cascade is triggered by chorionic gonadotropin during the first trimester of pregnancy and results in the morphological and functional development of breast tissue. On the other hand, the administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the early steps of weaning protects against tumor growth through reduction of the acute inflammatory reaction of post lactation remodeling of breast tissue. This is experimental evidence that may explain the short-term tumor-promoting effect of pregnancy. The protective effect of prolonged breast feeding may also be explained, at least in a part, by a reduced inflammatory reaction due to gradual weaning. Delay of first birth together with low parity and short duration of breast feeding are increasing social trends in developed countries. Therefore, breast cancer risk as a result of reproductive factors will not decrease in these countries in the foreseeable future. In this review, the significance of reproductive history with regard to the risk of breast cancers will be discussed, focusing on the age of first full-term birth and post lactation involution of the breast.     

Reproductive factors and breast cancer risk in Iceland. A second cohort study

In a previous prospective study we showed elevated risks for breast cancer in nulliparous women compared to parous women, in those having their first pregnancy at a higher age, and those with few children. This was based on 216 women diagnosed with breast cancer during 1965 to 1975 among 34,525 women having attended the cervix cancer detection clinic in Iceland by the end of 1974, and born between 1906 and 1945. The present investigation on 848 cases, diagnosed among 6 1,040 women attending the cervix cancer detection clinic during 1964 to 1984 and born between 1901 and 1960, shows the same risk factors to be significant. The relative risks are, however, smaller. The reasons for the difference in relative risks are discussed, We find that the effect of age at first birth is significant for women up to the age of 65 and not for older women. In both cohorts, women older than 55 are underrepresented and more so in the earlier report. In addition, the small number of cases in the reference group with age at first birth below 20 appears to have made the figures of our earlier report unreliable.     

Reproductive factors and risk of contralateral breast cancer by BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status: results from the WECARE study

Objective

Reproductive factors, such as early age at menarche, late age at menopause, and nulliparity are known risk factors for breast cancer. Previously, we reported these factors to be associated with risk of developing contralateral breast cancer (CBC). In this study, we evaluated the association between these factors and CBC risk among BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutation carriers and non-carriers.

Methods

The WECARE Study is a population-based multi-center case–control study of 705 women with CBC (cases) and 1,397 women with unilateral breast cancer (controls). All participants were screened for BRCA1/2 mutations and 181 carriers were identified. Conditional logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between reproductive factors and CBC for mutation carriers and non-carriers.

Results

None of the associations between reproductive factors and CBC risk differed between mutation carriers and non-carriers. The increase in risk with younger age at menarche and decrease in risk in women with more than two full-term pregnancies seen in non-carriers were not significantly different in carriers (adjusted RRs = 1.31, 95% CI 0.65–2.65 and 0.53, 95% CI 0.19–1.51, respectively). No significant associations between the other reproductive factors and CBC risk were observed in mutation carriers or non-carriers.

Conclusion

For two reproductive factors previously shown to be associated with CBC risk, we observed similar associations for BRCA1/2 carriers. This suggests that reproductive variables that affect CBC risk may have similar effects in mutation carriers and non-carriers.     

Reproductive history and risk of breast cancer: a case-control study in an unselected Swedish population

Variables in reproductive histories were studied in 179 consecutively detected, unselected breast cancer patients and age-matched controls selected from a computerized population register. The comparison between patients and controls showed no significant difference in age at meanarche, age at first birth, age at menopause or number of children. A subdivision into pre- and post-menopausal women yielded no further information. These results are at variance with most earlier reports, possible because the controls here were selected from the whole female population instead of hospitalized patients. Our data do not support the view that it is possible to define groups at high risk for breast cancer on the basis of productive histories.     

Family history of breast cancer and young age at diagnosis of breast cancer increase risk of second primary malignancies in women: a population-based cohort study

Among 152 600 breast cancer patients diagnosed during 1958-2000, there was a 22% increased risk of developing a second primary non-breast malignancy (standardised incidence ratio (SIR)=1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.19-1.24). The highest risk was seen for connective tissue cancer (SIR=1.78; 95% CI: 1.49-2.10). Increased risks were noted among women diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50. Oesophagus cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma showed six- and four-fold higher risks, respectively, in women with a family history of breast cancer compared to those without in the > or =10-year follow-up period.     

Reproductive history and the risk of molecular breast cancer subtypes in a prospective study of Norwegian women

Purpose

Breast cancer can be classified into molecular subtypes that differ in clinical characteristics and prognosis. There is some but conflicting evidence that reproductive risk factors may differ between distinct breast cancer subtypes.

Methods

We investigated associations of reproductive factors with the risk for six molecular breast cancer subtypes in a cohort of 21,532 Norwegian women who were born between 1886 and 1928 and followed up for breast cancer incidence between 1961 and 2008. We obtained stored tumor tissue from incident breast cancers and used immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization to classify 825 invasive tumors into three luminal subtypes [Luminal A, Luminal B (HER2?) and Luminal B (HER2+)] and three non-luminal subtypes [human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) subtype, basal-like phenotype (BP) and five negative phenotype (5NP)]. We used Cox regression to assess reproductive factors and risk for each subtype.

Results

We found that young age at menarche, old age at first birth and low parity were associated with increased risk for luminal breast cancer subtypes. For the HER2 subtype, we either found no association or associations in the opposite direction compared to the luminal subtypes. The BP subtype appeared to have a similar reproductive risk profile as the luminal subtypes. Breastfeeding was associated with a reduced risk for HER2 and 5NP subtypes, but was not associated with any other subtype.

Conclusions

The results suggest that molecular breast cancer subtypes differ in their reproductive risk factors, but associations with non-luminal subtypes are still poorly understood and warrant further study.     

Alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking in combination: A predictor of contralateral breast cancer risk in the WECARE study

Alcohol drinking and, to a lesser extent, cigarette smoking are risk factors for a first primary breast cancer. Information on these behaviours at diagnosis may contribute to risk prediction of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) and they are potentially modifiable. The WECARE Study is a large population‐based case‐control study of women with breast cancer where cases (N = 1,521) had asynchronous CBC and controls (N = 2,212), matched on survival time and other factors, had unilateral breast cancer (UBC). Using multivariable conditional logistic regression to estimate rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), we examined the risk of CBC in relation to drinking and smoking history at and following first diagnosis. We adjusted for treatment, disease characteristics and other factors. There was some evidence for an association between CBC risk and current drinking or current smoking at the time of first breast cancer diagnosis, but the increased risk occurred primarily among women exposed to both (RR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.24–2.11). CBC risk was also elevated in women who both smoked and drank alcohol after diagnosis (RR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.18–1.99). In the subset of women with detailed information on amount consumed, smoking an average of ≥10 cigarettes per day following diagnosis was also associated with increased CBC risk (RR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.08–2.08; p‐trend = 0.03). Among women with a diagnosis of breast cancer, information on current drinking and smoking could contribute to the prediction of CBC risk. Women who both drink and smoke may represent a group who merit targeted lifestyle intervention to modify their risk of CBC.     

Relationship between diabetes and risk of second primary contralateral breast cancer

Breast cancer survivors have a substantially higher risk of developing a second primary contralateral breast cancer (CBC) compared to the risk of breast cancer among women in the general population. While data regarding the relationship between diabetes and breast cancer incidence are inconsistent, diabetes is more clearly linked to an elevated risk of all-cause mortality among breast cancer survivors. However, no prior studies have assessed its impact on CBC risk. We assessed the relationship between diabetes, and CBC risk in a population-based nested case–control study consisting of women 40–79 years of age diagnosed with a first primary ER-positive invasive breast cancer. It included 322 women who developed a second primary CBC and 616-matched control women diagnosed only with a first breast cancer. We used conditional logistic regression to quantify associations between diabetes and CBC risk. Compared to women without a history of diabetes, diabetics had a 2.2-fold [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3–3.6] increased risk of CBC. This risk was more pronounced among women diagnosed with their first breast cancer before age 60 years (odds ratio, OR = 11.5, 95% CI 2.4–54.5), compared to those diagnosed at age 60 years or older (OR = 1.5, 95% CI 0.8–2.7, P for interaction = 0.011). Diabetics diagnosed with breast cancer appear to have an elevated risk of CBC. This is the first study to report this relationship, but if confirmed efforts to insure that diabetic breast cancer survivors are carefully screened for second breast cancers may be warranted.     

Reproductive and menstrual history and papillary thyroid cancer risk: the San Francisco Bay Area thyroid cancer study.

Thyroid cancer rates are three times higher in women than men during the period between puberty and menopause, suggesting that the etiology of thyroid cancer may be related to female sex hormones and reproductive function. However, the results from epidemiological studies have been mixed. To assess this hypothesis, data on menstrual history, pregnancy history, and exogenous hormone use were analyzed from a population-based, case-control study conducted in the San Francisco Bay Area. Of 817 incident thyroid cancer patients (cases), ages 20-74 years, who were diagnosed in 1992-1998 and 793 controls, identified by random-digit dialing and frequency matched to cases on age and race/ethnicity, 608 (74%) cases and 558 (70%) controls were interviewed. Of these cases, 544 were of papillary histology and included in the present analysis. Women who reported onset of menarche before age 12 or after age 14 were at about 50% increased risk for papillary thyroid cancer; however, this effect differed among age- and ethnic-specific subgroups. Among parous women younger than age 45, risk was elevated for several variables measuring recency of pregnancy. Risk was reduced for women who had ever used oral contraceptives [odds ratio (OR), 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52-0.97], but there was no trend with duration of use. Although it remains unclear how sex hormones influence thyroid carcinogenesis, these relationships warrant further investigation.     

Reproductive history and risk of three breast cancer subtypes defined by three biomarkers

Breast cancer subtypes defined by estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 expression are biologically distinct and thus, may have distinct etiologies. In particular, it is plausible that risk factors operating through hormonal mechanisms are differentially related to risk of such tumor subtypes. Using data from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, we explored associations between reproductive history and three breast cancer subtypes. Data on parity and age at first birth were collected from 743,623 women, 10,896 of whom were subsequently diagnosed with breast cancer. Cases were classified into three subtypes based on tumor maker expression: (1) ER positive (ER+, N = 8,203), (2) ER negative/PR negative/HER2 positive (ER−/PR−/HER2+, N = 288), or (3) ER-, PR-, and HER2-negative (triple-negative, N = 645). Associations with reproductive history, evaluated using Cox regression, differed significantly across tumor subtypes. Nulliparity was most strongly associated with risk of ER+ breast cancer [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23–1.39]; late age at first birth was most strongly associated with risk of ER-/PR-/HER2+ disease (HR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.31–2.56). Neither parity nor age at first birth was associated with triple-negative breast cancer. In contrast to ER+ and ER−/PR−/HER2+ subtypes, reproductive history does not appear to be a risk factor for triple-negative breast cancer.     

Breast cancer risk factors and second primary malignancies among women with breast cancer

Purpose To examine the association between breast cancer risk factors and second primary cancers (independent diagnoses occurring at least 12 months after the initial breast cancer diagnosis) among breast cancer survivors. Methods In this population-based study, cancer outcomes among breast cancer survivors first diagnosed during 1987–2000 were investigated. Invasive breast cancer cases were identified from the statewide tumor registry and interviewed regarding their pre-diagnosis risk factors, including reproductive and lifestyle characteristics, approximately 1 year after diagnosis. Data on second primary cancers (not recurrences) and deaths were obtained by linkage with tumor registry reports and death certificates through December 31, 2002. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using proportional hazards regression stratified by age and adjusted for stage and other factors. Results Among the 10,953 breast cancer cases, 10.8% experienced a second cancer diagnosis within an average of 7 years (including 488 breast, 132 colorectal, 113 endometrial, and 36 ovarian cancers). Risk of a second primary breast cancer increased according to low parity (P = 0.002), older age at menopause (P = 0.08), greater body mass index (P = 0.003) and adult weight gain (P = 0.02), and a family history of breast cancer-particularly among women with 2 or more first-degree affected relatives (HR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1–2.9). Reduced risk of colorectal cancer after breast cancer was observed in relation to older ages at menarche (P = 0.05), younger age at menopause (P = 0.04), postmenopausal hormone use (HR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.3–0.7), normal body mass index (P = 0.07), and infrequent alcohol consumption (P = 0.01). Second endometrial cancer risk was associated with increasing body mass index (P < 0.01) and adult weight gain (P = 0.03). Risk of second ovarian cancer appeared related to recent alcohol intake and family history of breast cancer. Women who reported consuming any alcohol appeared to have a 55% reduction in ovarian cancer risk (95% CI: 0.2–1.0) compared to non-drinkers, while having 2 or more first-degree relatives with breast cancer was associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer (HR = 4.3, 95% CI: 1.3–14.6). Conclusion This study suggests that family history of breast cancer as well as potentially modifiable characteristics including body weight, alcohol intake, and postmenopausal hormone use may be associated with risk of a second cancer diagnosis among breast cancer cases.     

Reproductive history in relation to breast cancer risk among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women

Objective To evaluate reproductive history risk factors in breast cancer among Hispanic (HISP) women in the U.S. southwest, a population with approximately 33% lower breast cancer incidence than non-Hispanic whites (NHW). Methods Population-based case–control study of HISP (796 cases, 919 controls) and NHW (1,525 cases, 1,596 controls) women. Results 19.3% of HISP women reported five or more births and had a reduced risk of breast cancer, adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.70 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50, 0.98) compared to those with one or two births. Breast cancer risk for HISP increased with older age at first birth, p trend = 0.008. Parity and age at first birth associations were specific to ER positive tumors. HISP women who had given birth within five years had higher breast cancer risk than women with 16–25 years since a birth, OR 2.62 (95% CI: 1.44, 4.78); the trend with years since last birth was stronger than for NHWs, p interaction = 0.05. Conclusions Reproductive history influences on breast cancer risk among HISP were similar to associations reported for NHWs. Differences in the prevalence of reproductive risk factors would explain an estimated 6.6% lower breast cancer incidence for HISP compared to NHWs.     

Reproductive history and risk of small bowel cancer by histologic type: a population-based study

Purpose

The male predominance of the two main histologic malignancies of the small bowel cancer may reflect a role of sex hormones which will be examined in this study.

Methods

This was a nationwide population-based nested case–control study, based on a cohort of subjects born between 1932 and 2008, as identified in the Swedish Multi-Generation Register. For each case of small bowel cancer, 10 age- and sex-matched controls were randomly selected. Number of children and age at having the first child were analyzed in relation to the risk of small bowel cancer using conditional logistic regression, providing odds ratios (ORs) and 95?% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

A total of 632 female cases and 894 male cases of small bowel cancer were included. No overall increased risk of small bowel cancer was found in parous compared to non-parous women (OR?=?1.02, 95?% CI 0.67–1.54). There was no association between age at first birth and small bowel cancer (>30?years of age vs <20?years; OR?=?1.04, 95?% CI 0.72–1.50). No associations were detected in separate analyses of adenocarcinoma or carcinoid of the small bowel. No distinct risk patterns were discerned in men compared to women.

Conclusions

Reproductive history does not seem to be associated with the risk of small bowel cancer, independent of histologic type.     

Determinants of ovarian cancer risk. I. Reproductive experiences and family history

Reproductive experiences and family history were assessed in 215 white females with epithelial ovarian cancer and in 215 control women matched by age, race, and residence. Pregnancy exerted a strong protective effect against ovarian cancer, which increased with the number of live-born children. After adjustment for parity, an effect of age at first live birth and breast-feeding was not apparent. Menstrual events did not differ significantly between cases and controls, although cases were more likely to have had an earlier menopause and less likely to have had a surgical menopause. Women with ovarian cancer had more frequently used menopausal hormones in cyclic fashion compared to controls. Regarding family history, women with ovarian cancer more frequently reported consanguinity in their ancestry and a highly frequency of primary relatives with cancer of the colon, lung, ovary, and prostate gland.     

Tamoxifen therapy for primary breast cancer and risk of contralateral breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Women diagnosed with breast cancer have a twofold to sixfold greater risk of developing contralateral breast cancer than women in the general population have of developing a first breast cancer. Tamoxifen therapy reduces this risk, but it is unclear if this benefit exists for both estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative contralateral tumors. METHODS: Using data from a population-based tumor registry that collects information on the ER status of breast tumors, we followed 8981 women residing in western Washington State who were diagnosed with a primary unilateral invasive breast cancer during the period from 1990 through 1998 to identify cases of contralateral breast cancer. We restricted our analyses to women who were at least 50 years old and whose first breast cancer had a localized or regional stage; women who received adjuvant hormonal therapy but not chemotherapy (n = 4654) were classified as tamoxifen users, while those who received neither adjuvant hormonal therapy nor chemotherapy (n = 4327) were classified as nonusers of tamoxifen. By reviewing selected patient abstracts, we estimated that 94% of the subjects were classified correctly with respect to tamoxifen use. The risk of contralateral breast cancer associated with tamoxifen use was estimated with the use of Cox regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Of the 89 tamoxifen users and 100 nonusers of tamoxifen diagnosed with contralateral breast cancer, 112 had ER-positive tumors, 20 had ER-negative tumors, and 57 had tumors with an ER status that was unknown or had not been determined by an immunohistochemical assay. The risk of developing an ER-positive and an ER-negative contralateral tumor among tamoxifen users was 0.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.5 to 1.1) and 4.9 (95% CI = 1.4 to 17.4), respectively, times that of nonusers of tamoxifen. This difference in risk by ER status was statistically significant (P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Tamoxifen use appears to decrease the risk of ER-positive contralateral breast tumors, but it appears to increase the risk of ER-negative contralateral tumors.     

Family history of breast cancer and breast cancer risk in Japan

We studied 132 families with a family history of breast cancer (familial aggregation cases, FA cases) to assess the breast cancer risk presented by such a family history. For comparison with these FA cases, we randomly selected 132 control families of sporadic cases (SP controls) by adjusting for the age of the proband at surgery. Information on family history was collected for all first-degree female relatives and maternal and paternal grandmothers. Japanese women with a first-degree relative affected by breast cancer were found to have an increased risk of the disease. The odds ratio (OR) for women with a family history of breast cancer was 1.99 (95% confidence interval [ CI ], 1.48-2.66). The OR for FA-case doughters of women with breast cancer was 1.54 (95% CI, 0.91-2.63). A higher risk was not observed if a woman's mother had breast cancer. If the proband had a sister with breast cancer, a slightly increased risk of other cancers of the proband was observed (OR, 1.85 [ 0.87-3.92]). These results suggest that a family history of breast cancer in Japanese women may affect their risk of developing cancer of the breast and other organs.