Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: temporal pattern of thrombocytopenia in relation to initial use or reexposure to heparin

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated adverse drug reaction associated with a decrease of platelet counts that usually begins after at least 5 days of heparin treatment. Uncertainty exists about the risk of early onset of HIT (ie, < 5 days) in relation to previous heparin exposure. We therefore analyzed the temporal pattern of thrombocytopenia in patients with laboratory-confirmed HIT to assess whether patients with previous heparin exposure have an increased risk of early onset of HIT. DESIGN: Platelet count patterns in patients with a laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of HIT were examined in a retrospective chart review of a clinical study database. The onset of thrombocytopenia < 100 x 10(9)/L associated with the current heparin treatment (mainly unfractionated heparin) was analyzed using nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients with 125 treatment episodes were assessed: HIT developed in 79 patients during initial exposure to heparin, and in 46 patients during reexposure. Early onset (< 5 days) of thrombocytopenia was associated with very recent heparin exposure. Patients reexposed to heparin within 3 months had an earlier onset of thrombocytopenia as compared to patients reexposed to heparin after 3 months (4.9 +/- 4.4 days vs 11.5 +/- 5.5 days [mean +/- SD], p = 0.001). There was no difference between onset on thrombocytopenia < 100 x 10(9)/L in patients reexposed to heparin within 3 to 12 months and after 1 year (9.7 +/- 6.4 days vs 12.3 +/- 5.2 days, p = 0.41). Whether platelet counts were obtained daily or less regularly did not affect the analysis. CONCLUSION: Early onset of thrombocytopenia in HIT is associated with recent heparin treatment (< 3 months). In contrast, for patients who did not receive heparin within the previous 3 months, HIT is an unlikely explanation for thrombocytopenia that occurs within the first 5 days.     

Pulmonary embolism after cesarian section due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia despite normal platelet count

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II is typically characterized by a decrease in platelet count to values between 20 and 120 x 10 (9)/L or a platelet count fall of greater than 50%. We report on a patient who developed a HIT syndrome, thrombosis of the vena cava, and fulminant pulmonary embolism during heparin treatment after cesarean section, without a significant decrease in platelet count. Lepirudin anticoagulation and ecarin clotting time (ECT) monitoring were used successfully during cardiopulmonary bypass.     

Two cases of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and a review of the literature

We experienced two cases of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) which occurred during unfractionated heparin treatment. The first patient was a 72-year-old man, who was admitted to our hospital because of sudden onset dyspnea in January 2000. He was diagnosed as having a pulmonary embolism and heparin was started. Nine days later, progressive embolization of the pulmonary artery and femoral vein was found and thrombocytopenia (platelet count 20 x 10(9)/l) was observed 14 days after that. Cessation of heparin and administration of argatroban resulted in progressive normalization of the platelet count. The second patient was a 62-year-old woman, who was admitted to our hospital in April 2001, with the chief complaint of sudden onset dyspnea. She was diagnosed as having acute left-sided heart failure and heparin was started. Fifteen 15 days later, thrombocytopenia (platelet count 17 x 10(9)/l) was observed. Cessation of heparin resulted in normalization of the platelet count. Both cases were positive for anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibody. Here we report on the clinical course of two cases of HIT with a review of the literature.     

Biological and clinical features of low-molecular-weight heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a common adverse effect of unfractionated heparin (UFH) therapy. In contrast, only a few patients have been reported with HIT following low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) therapy (LMW-HIT). To define the clinical and biological characteristics of LMW-HIT, 180 patients treated for suspected HIT at 15 French centres were investigated. Clinical history was recorded and HIT was confirmed in 59 patients with positive serotonin release assay results: 57 of them had high levels of antibodies (Abs) to heparin-platelet factor 4 complexes (H/PF4) and two had Abs to interleukin 8. Eleven patients were treated exclusively with LMWH (LMW-HIT) and 48 with UFH either alone (UF-HIT, n = 34) or combined with LMWH (UF/LMW-HIT, n = 14). The LMW-HIT and UF-HIT groups were similar with respect to sex, age, platelet count before heparin therapy, frequency of bleeding and occurrence of disseminated intravascular coagulation. The interval to onset of HIT was longer in LMW-HIT patients compared with UF-HIT patients (P = 0.03). Severe thrombocytopenia (platelets < 15 x 10(9)/l) was more frequent in the LMW-HIT group (P = 0.04). Thrombosis occurred in three of 11 LMW-HIT patients, i.e. as frequently as in UF-HIT patients. LMW-HIT is potentially severe and may be observed after longer heparin treatment compared with UF-HIT. It is highly recommended, therefore, that platelet counts be monitored carefully whenever LMWH is administered.     

ET gets HIT--thrombocytotic heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in a patient with essential thrombocythemia (ET).

Immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a relatively common complication in patients receiving heparin, and represents a strong risk factor for thromboembolic disease associated with high morbidity and mortality. The condition is commonly defined as a platelet count fall of greater than 30-50% to values below 150 x 10(9)/l. Despite this, several cases with platelet count nadirs in the normal range have been reported. This report describes a patient with status post-carotid thrombendarterectomy presenting with neurological symptoms and thrombocytosis (1235 x 10(9)/l), which in due course was diagnosed to be caused by essential thrombocythemia (ET). Heparin therapy was established and symptoms resolved markedly. After 5 days of standard heparin therapy, serologically confirmed HIT with new neurological symptoms occurred. The platelet count nadir attributed to HIT was far above normal (633 x 10(9)/l), which nevertheless represented a substantial relative platelet count fall (49%). This is the first reported case of serologically confirmed HIT in a patient with ET. Furthermore, it represents the first published case of HIT being present in thrombocytosis. Clinicians should be aware that atypical HIT can even be present in thrombocytosis and, because of nomenclature, HIT with normal and elevated platelet count nadirs is likely to be largely underdiagnosed.     

Treatment of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT)

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a novel prothrombotic disorder characterized by thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, and disseminated intravascular coagulation identified in hundreds of recipients of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford/AstraZeneca), an adenovirus vector coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. VITT resembles heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in that patients have platelet-activating anti-platelet factor 4 antibodies; however, whereas heparin typically enhances platelet activation by HIT antibodies, VITT antibody-induced platelet activation is often inhibited in vitro by pharmacological concentrations of heparin. Further, the thrombotic complications in VITT feature much higher frequencies of atypical thrombosis, most notably cerebral vein thrombosis and splanchnic vein thrombosis, compared with HIT. In this review, we outline the treatments that have been used to manage this novel condition since its recognition in March 2021, including anticoagulation, high-dose intravenous immune globulin, therapeutic plasma exchange, corticosteroids, rituximab, and eculizumab. We discuss the controversial issue of whether heparin, which often inhibits VITT antibody-induced platelet activation, is harmful in the treatment of VITT. We also describe a case of “long VITT,” describing the treatment challenges resulting from platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies that persisted for more than 9 months.     

Low incidence of thrombocytopenia with porcine mucosal heparin. A prospective multicenter study

We treated 193 patients either intravenously (94) or subcutaneously (99) for at least 5 days with porcine intestinal mucosal heparin and followed them up prospectively with frequent platelet counts to determine the incidence of heparin-related thrombocytopenia and arterial thrombosis. None of the patients in the study developed severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count, less than 100 x 10(9)/L) or arterial thrombosis. Eight patients had a platelet count of 100 to 140 X 10(9)/L on one occasion, with a count of greater than 140 x 10(9)/L on the subsequent measurement. The mean (+/- SD) values of the initial and lowest platelet counts during therapy in all patients were 288 +/- 100 x 10(9)/L and 253 +/- 88 x 10(9)/L, respectively, with the lowest counts occurring on day 4.1 +/- 4.2. A least-squares line was computed for each patient to fit the day and counts; the slopes were significantly different from zero and negative in 7.8% of patients and positive in 14.5%. This multicenter study confirms the reports that the incidence of heparin-related severe thrombocytopenia and arterial thrombosis is distinctly low in patients treated with porcine-mucosal heparin.     

Current agents for the treatment of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Several counterintuitive treatment paradoxes complicate the management of immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). For example, simple discontinuation of heparin often fails to prevent subsequent HIT-associated thrombosis. Thus, current treatment guidelines recommend substituting heparin with a rapidly acting alternative anticoagulant (eg, danaparoid, lepirudin, or argatroban) even when HIT is suspected on the basis of thrombocytopenia alone ("isolated HIT"). Another paradox-coumarin (warfarin) anticoagulation-can lead to venous limb gangrene in a patient with HIT-associated deep-vein thrombosis. Thus, warfarin is not recommended during acute thrombocytopenia secondary to HIT. However, warfarin can be given as overlapping therapy with an alternative anticoagulant, provided that (1) initiation of warfarin is delayed until substantial platelet count recovery has occurred (to at least above 100 x 10(9)/L); (2) low initial doses of warfarin are used; (3) at least 5 days of overlapping therapy are given; and (4) the alternative agent is maintained until the platelet count has normalized. It has recently been recognized that HIT antibodies are transient and usually do not recur upon subsequent re-exposure to heparin. This leads to a further paradox-patients with previous HIT can be considered for a brief re-exposure to heparin under exceptional circumstances; for example, heart surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass, if HIT antibodies are no longer detectable using sensitive assays. For patients with acute or recent HIT who require urgent heart surgery, other approaches include use of alternative anticoagulants (eg, lepirudin or danaparoid) for cardiopulmonary bypass or antiplatelet agents (eg, tirofiban or epoprostenol) to permit intraoperative use of heparin.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Hemorrhage is the most common and best-recognized complication of heparin treatment. However, a potentially more dangerous complication is the development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). All patients exposed to heparin, irrespective of the dose and route of administration, are at risk of developing HIT. It is due to the formation of antibodies against the heparin-platelet factor 4 complex, which cause secondary activation of platelets, coagulation and, finally, increased thrombin production. The main symptom is the sudden onset of thrombocytopenia involving a drop in the platelet count to less than 50% of the basal level, with or without the appearance of thrombotic complications some 5 to 14 days after the start of heparin therapy. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia can be detected early in patients receiving heparin by monitoring the platelet count. Demonstration of heparin-dependent platelet activation using an antigen or functional assay confirms the clinical diagnosis. Once the diagnosis of HIT has been confirmed serologically or there is a high level of suspicion of HIT, heparin must be suspended and treatment with an alternative anticoagulant should be considered. This review contains a discussion of the diagnosis and treatment of this syndrome.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia from venous thromboembolism treatment

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to characterize the clinical experiences of patients in whom heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) complicated heparin therapy for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and who switched to argatroban. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of previously reported prospective, multicentre, historical-controlled Argatroban-911 and Argatroban-915 studies of argatroban therapy in HIT. SETTING: Inpatient. SUBJECTS: Patients (n = 145) administered heparin for VTE and who developed HIT were identified. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were treated with argatroban 2 mcg kg(-1) min(-1) for up to 14 days, adjusted to maintain activated partial thromboplastin times 1.5 to three times baseline. Patient characteristics, anticoagulation and outcomes were summarized. The primary end-point was a composite of death, amputation, or new thrombosis within 37 days of argatroban initiation. RESULTS: During heparin therapy, platelet counts decreased (mean +/- SD nadir: 78 +/- 67 x 10(9) L(-1)), and 75 (52%) patients developed thrombosis. After heparin was discontinued, patients received argatroban (mean dose 2.1 +/- 1.2 mcg kg(-1) min(-1)) for 6.8 +/- 4.3 days. By day 6 of argatroban therapy, the mean platelet count rose to >150 x 10(9) L(-1). The primary end-point occurred in 41 (28.3%) patients (values of 26-44% are reported for argatroban therapy of HIT from any heparin indication). Seventeen (11.7%) patients, including 12 who had also experienced thrombosis whilst on heparin, developed new thrombosis after argatroban initiation, typically on the day argatroban was discontinued or later (n = 10). Seven (4.8%) patients experienced major bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: For VTE patients with HIT, argatroban provides effective anticoagulation, with outcomes comparable with those reported for other argatroban-treated HIT patients. New thrombosis in this setting occurred most often in patients with existing HIT-associated thrombosis, before HIT recognition or either at/after argatroban discontinuation.     

Delayed-onset HIT caused by low-molecular-weight heparin manifesting during fondaparinux prophylaxis

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic condition caused by platelet-activating antibodies that react with platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes. Delayed-onset HIT occurs after heparin is stopped. Fondaparinux, a synthetic pentasaccharide, is thought to be a safe alternative anticoagulant in HIT. We describe a patient with delayed-onset HIT triggered by low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) which occurred during fondaparinux prophylaxis and which was complicated by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia. Patient serum contained high-titer anti-PF4/heparin antibodies demonstrating heparin-dependent platelet activation with serial dilutions. Confirmed delayed-onset HIT with LMWH has not been previously reported. Low dose fondaparinux does not necessarily prevent thrombotic complications of HIT.     

Spontaneous HIT syndrome post-knee replacement surgery with delayed recovery of thrombocytopenia: a case report and literature review

Recently published reports have established a heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)-mimicking thromboembolic disorder without proximate heparin exposure, called spontaneous HIT syndrome. Although the pathophysiology remains unclear, anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies possibly triggered by exposure to knee cartilage glycosaminoglycans or other non-heparin polyanions found on bacterial surfaces and nucleic acids have been postulated. We present a 53-year-old female receiving antithrombotic prophylaxis with aspirin following right total knee replacement surgery (without perioperative or any previous lifetime heparin exposure) who acutely presented with high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) and right great saphenous vein thrombophlebitis on postoperative day (POD) 14; her platelet count at presentation was 13 × 10⁹/L. Prior to diagnostic consideration of spontaneous HIT syndrome, the patient briefly received unfractionated heparin (UFH) and one dose of enoxaparin. The patient’s serum tested strongly positive for anti-PF4/heparin antibodies by two different PF4-dependent enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and by serotonin release assay (SRA). Failure of fondaparinux anticoagulation (persisting HIT-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation) prompted switching to argatroban. Severe thrombocytopenia persisted (platelet count nadir, 12 × 10⁹/L, on POD21), and 9 days after starting argatroban symptomatic right leg deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) occurred, prompting switch to rivaroxaban. Thereafter, her course was uneventful, although platelet count recovery was prolonged, reaching 99 × 10⁹/L by POD45 and 199 × 10⁹/L by POD79. The patient’s serum elicited strong serotonin release in the absence of heparin (seen even with 1/32 serum dilution) that was enhanced by pharmacological concentrations of UFH (0.1 and 0.3 IU/mL) and fondaparinux (0.1–1.2 μg/mL, i.e., in vitro fondaparinux “cross-reactivity”). Ultimately, platelet count recovery was associated with seroreversion to a negative SRA (documented at POD151). Our literature review identified joint replacement surgery, specifically knee replacement, to be a relatively common trigger of spontaneous HIT syndrome. Further, including our patient case, 5 of 7 patients with spontaneous HIT syndrome post-orthopedic surgery who received treatment with argatroban developed new and/or progressive lower-limb DVT or recurrent PE despite anticoagulation with this parenteral direct thrombin inhibitor, suggesting that this patient population is at high risk of breakthrough thrombotic events despite treatment with this HIT treatment-approved anticoagulant. Our case also illustrates successful outcome with rivaroxaban for treatment of spontaneous HIT syndrome, consistent with emerging literature supporting safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulant therapy for treatment of acute HIT.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There are two types of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT I is characterized by a transitory, slight and asymptomatic reduction in platelet count, occurring in the first 1-2 days of therapy, that resolves spontaneously; in contrast, HIT II, which has an immunologic origin, is characterized by a significant thrombocytopenia generally after the fifth day of therapy that usually resolves in 5-15 days only after therapy withdrawal. HIT II is the most frequent and dangerous side-effect of heparin therapy; in fact, in spite of thrombocytopenia, it can be complicated by venous and arterial thrombosis. Therefore, the recognition of HIT II may be difficult due to the underlying thrombotic symptoms for which heparin is administered. The aim of this article is to review the most recent advances in the field and to give critical guidelines for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of HIT II. STATE OF THE ART: The prevalence of HIT II, as confirmed by laboratory tests, seems to be about 2% in patients receiving unfractionated heparin (UH), while it is much lower in those receiving low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). The immunologic etiology of HIT II is largely accepted. Platelet factor 4 (PF4) displaced from endothelial heparan sulphate or directly from the platelets, binds to the heparin molecule to form an immunogenic complex. The anti-heparin/ PF4 IgG immunocomplexes activate platelets and provoke an immunologic endothelial lesion with thrombocytopenia and/or thrombosis. The IgG anti-heparin/PF4 immunocomplex activates platelets mainly through binding with the FcgRIIa (CD32) receptor. The onset of thrombocytopenia is independent of the dosage, schedule and route of administration of heparin. Orthopedic and cardiovascular surgery patients receiving post-surgical prophylaxis or treatment for deep venous thrombosis are at higher risk of HIT II. Besides thrombocytopenia, cutaneous allergic manifestations and skin necrosis may be present. Hemorrhagic events are not frequent, while the major clinical complications in 30% of patients are both arterial and venous thromboses which carry a 20% mortality. The diagnosis of HIT II should be formulated on the basis of clinical criteria and in vitro demonstration of heparin-dependent antibodies. Functional tests, such as platelet aggregation and (14)C-serotonin release assay and immunologic tests, such as the search for anti-PF4/heparin complex antibodies by an ELISA method are available. If HITT II is probable, heparin must be immediately suspended and an alternative anticoagulant therapy should be initiated before resolution of thrombocytopenia and the following treatment with a vitamin K antagonist. The general opinion is to administer low molecular weight heparin (in the absence of in vitro cross-reactivity with the antibodies), heparinoids such as Orgaran or direct thrombin inhibitors such as hirudin. PERSPECTIVES: Further studies are required to elucidate the pathogenesis of HIT II and especially to discover the clinical and immunologic factors that induce the occurrence of thrombotic complications. The best therapeutic strategy remains to be confirmed in larger clinical trials.     

High prevalence of heparin induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis among patients with essential thrombocytemia carrying V617F mutation

Arterial and venous complications are major causes of morbidity and mortality in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). MPNs patients, frequently receive heparin. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication resulting in a severe acquired thrombophilic condition. We carried out a retrospective analysis to evaluate occurrence of new thrombotic events during heparin therapy in essential thrombocythemia (ET) patients. We studied 108 ET patients on heparin for treatment of previous thrombotic events or in thromboprophilaxis. Fifty-eight of them carried JAK 2 V617F mutation while 50 patients were without V617F mutation. Ten patients, among those with JAK 2 V617F mutation after a median of 10 days from heparin treatment presented a platelet drop, new thrombotic events and in 10/10 cases heparin-related antibodies were found. In the other group, two patients (4%) presented a platelet drop, thrombotic manifestations and heparin related antibodies. Our data show that HIT is more frequent, during heparin treatment, in patients with ET carrying V617F mutation, as compared with patients without mutations (P?=?0.029). ET with V617F mutation seems to be associated with higher risk of thrombotic complications during heparin treatment. Monitoring platelet counts very closely during the course of heparin is essential especially in ET patients in which platelet drop may be hidden by constitutional thrombocytosis.     

Successful intravenous immune globulin therapy for human immunodeficiency virus-associated thrombocytopenia

High-dose intravenous (IV) immune globulin was used to treat human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated thrombocytopenia four times in three patients. The average platelet count at initiation of therapy was 12 x 10(9)/L (12 x 10(3)/mm3), and the platelet count after therapy was 159 x 10(9)/L (159 x 10(3)/mm3), giving a mean increase of 147 x 10(9)/L (147 x 10(3)/mm3) (1225%). The conditions of two of these patients were refractory to corticosteroids, but giving IV immune globulin along with steroids appeared to enhance the response to IV immune globulin. A review of the literature revealed that 53 (88%) of 60 patients with HIV-associated thrombocytopenia responded to IV immune globulin with platelet counts greater than 50 x 10(9)/L (50 x 10(3)/mm3). We conclude that IV immune globulin therapy achieves transient elevations in platelet counts to levels that control bleeding and permit surgery in patients with severe, HIV-associated thrombocytopenia.     

Investigation of a platelet factor 4 polymorphism on the immune response in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

A small fraction of patients who receive heparin develop heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and, of these patients, a still smaller proportion develop associated thrombotic complications. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is caused by the formation of antibodies that bind to specific complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. However, it remains uncertain why certain patients form these antibodies and develop HIT or why certain patients have thrombotic events. In this report we describe studies on individuals with and without HIT to determined if a potential PF4 polymorphism could explain differences in susceptibility to HIT. In the 10 control individuals and the 10 patients we studied, we did not find a difference in the PF4 sequences. Genetic difference in the PF4 antigenic target does not explain the occurrence of HIT in susceptible patients.     

Risk factors for thrombosis in patients with immune mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND: As reported by major clinical series in the literature, about 2% of patients receiving unfractionated heparin (UFH) develop immune-mediated (type II) heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) that may be complicated in 30-75% of cases by a paradoxical thrombotic syndrome (HITTS), either arterial or venous. HITTS carries relevant rates of mortality and morbidity, amongst which cerebral and/or myocardial infarction and limb amputations. It is unclear as yet why some patients suffer from isolated thrombocytopenia (HIT), whilst others have HITTS. The aim of the present study was to look for clinical and laboratory features related to the occurrence of HITTS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the clinical records of 56 patients with proven HIT, as diagnosed on clinical grounds and by in vitro demonstration of immunoglobulin (IgG)/IgM against the PF4/heparin complex. Thirty-four patients (61%) had HITTS (19 venous thrombosis, seven arterial thrombosis, five arterial and venous thrombosis, two skin necrosis, one diffuse intravascular coagulation), whereas 22 had uncomplicated HIT. Amongst HITTS patients, two had limb amputation, five had recurrent thrombosis and seven died. Amongst HIT patients three died from causes unrelated to HIT. RESULTS: No significant difference in sex, age, previous exposure to heparin, UFH route of administration or dose, duration of therapy, time of onset of thrombocytopenia and platelet count recovery, nor antiheparin/PF4 antibodies subtype (IgG or IgM) was detected when comparing HIT and HITTS. In contrast, in the HITTS group a higher prevalence of orthopaedic surgery (15 of 34 vs. 2/22; P=0.01), a significantly lower platelet count nadir (43 +/- 32 vs. 75 +/- 63 x 109/L; P=0.01) and a significantly higher titre of antiheparin/PF4 antibodies, expressed as optical density of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); (1989 +/- 1024 vs. 1277 +/- 858; P=0.009), were observed in comparison with the HIT group. Amongst HITTS patients, the prevalence of venous thrombosis was significantly higher in orthopaedic patients and in those being treated for venous thromboembolism (18/24 vs. 1/9 patients, chi2 8.4, P=0.004), whilst arterial thrombosis (ART) occurred more often in heparin treatment for arterial disease (3/4 vs. 4/29 patients, chi2 4.6, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Orthopaedic surgery, the severity of thrombocytopenia and high antiheparin/PF4 antibodies titre are adverse prognostic or concurrent factors in the development of HITTS.     

Investigation of a platelet factor 4 polymorphism on the immune response in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

A small fraction of patients who receive heparin develop heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and, of these patients, a still smaller proportion develop associated thrombotic complications. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is caused by the formation of antibodies that bind to specific complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. However, it remains uncertain why certain patients form these antibodies and develop HIT or why certain patients have thrombotic events. In this report we describe studies on individuals with and without HIT to determined if a potential PF4 polymorphism could explain differences in susceptibility to HIT. In the 10 control individuals and the 10 patients we studied, we did not find a difference in the PF4 sequences. Genetic difference in the PF4 antigenic target does not explain the occurrence of HIT in susceptible patients.     

Serum antibodies to the heparin/platelet factor 4 complex are an independent predictor of thrombotic complications following pediatric fontan surgery

Antibodies to the heparin/platelet factor 4 complex (heparin/PF4) are linked to the pathogenesis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and to the thrombotic complications. We investigated thrombotic events during early follow-up in a pediatric cardiac surgical population to ascertain whether there is a relation between heparin/PF4 antibody concentration and post-surgical thrombotic complications. One hundred and five consecutive pediatric patients treated by Fontan surgery were studied. The presence of serum heparin/PF4 immunoglobulins IgG, IgA, and IgM (collectively termed HIT antibodies) were measured in preoperative and postoperative blood samples by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. On day six after Fontan surgery, HIT-related thromboses was identified in total of 11 patients (10.5%). HIT antibodies were detected in 34 of 105 patients (32.4%). The post-surgical nadir platelet count was significantly lower in patients who developed antibodies (p < 0.001). We found the odds ratio (OR) for this composite endpoint was 4.06 (p < 0.001). Seropositive status for heparin/PF4 antibodies was an independent predictor of thrombotic events (OR 2.28; p < 0.001). Quintile analysis revealed that the median nadir platelet value was significantly lower in patients with higher HIT antibody titers. Patients in the highest quintile of HIT antibody titer all experienced thrombotic events, while only two thrombotic events occurred in patients in the lowest quintile (p < 0.001). Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a rare occurrence in pediatric cardiac surgical patients. Patients who develop antibodies to the heparin/PF4 complex have a significantly higher rate of postoperative thrombotic events than patients who lack these antibodies. Within the seropositive group, the risk of developing thrombosis increased with the plasma antibody concentration.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hemodialysis. Case report and review of the literature

Thrombocytopenia is a potential complication of heparin therapy. There are two forms of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Type-I HIT is characterized by a mild decrease in platelet count that occurs within the first 2-4 days after heparin initiation. The platelet count often returns to normal without stop heparin treatment. The mechanism of thrombocytopenia appears to be due to a direct effect of heparin on platelet activation. The second form (type-II) is an immune-mediated disorder characterized by severe thrombocytopenia, which may include both arterial and venous thrombosis. We present a case of type-II HIT occurred in a hemodialysis patient resulting in acute pulmonary embolism and peripheral venous thrombosis, and review the literature.