HBV reactivation in patients with HCV/HBV cirrhosis on treatment with direct‐acting antivirals

Anecdotal reports suggest that patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) hepatitis and overt or occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection may reactivate HBV when HCV is suppressed or cleared by direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs). We assessed the prevalence of overt or previous HBV coinfection and the risk of HBV reactivation in patients with HCV cirrhosis treated with DAAs. This was a retrospective cohort of 104 consecutive patients with HCV cirrhosis treated with DAAs. Serum HCV‐RNA and HBV‐DNA were tested at weeks 4, 8 and 12 of DAAs therapy and at week 12 of follow‐up. At the start of DAAs, eight patients (7.7%) were HBsAg positive/HBeAg negative with undetectable HBV‐DNA and low levels of quantitative HBsAg (four on nucleos(t)ide analogues [NUCs] and four inactive carriers), 37 patients (35.6%) had markers of previous HBV infection (25 anti‐HBc positive, 12 anti‐HBc/anti‐HBs positive) and 59 (56.7%) had no evidence of HBV infection. Sixty‐seven patients (64.4%) were HCV‐RNA negative at week 4 and 98 (94.2%) achieved sustained virological response. All four HBsAg‐positive patients treated with NUCs remained HBV‐DNA negative, but three of four untreated patients showed an increase in HBV‐DNA of 2‐3 log without a biochemical flare and achieved HBV‐DNA suppression when given NUCs. During or after DAAs, by conventional assay, HBV‐DNA remained not detectable in all 37 anti‐HBc‐positive patients but in three of them (8.1%) HBV‐DNA became detectable with a highly sensitive PCR. HBV reactivation is likely to occur in untreated HBV/HCV‐coinfected cirrhotic patients when they undergo HCV treatment with DAAs. Pre‐emptive therapy with NUCs should be considered in this setting. Anti‐HBc‐positive patients rarely reactivate HBV without clinical or virological outcomes.     

Tolerability and efficacy of anti‐HBV nucleos(t)ide analogues in HBV‐DNA‐positive cirrhotic patients with HBV/HCV dual infection

Summary. We evaluated tolerability and virological and clinical impact of anti‐Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) nucleos(t)ide analogues in cirrhotic patients with HBV/Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) coinfection. The virological and clinical course of 24 consecutive HBsAg/HBV‐DNA/anti‐HCV‐positive patients with cirrhosis was compared with that of 24 HBsAg/HBV‐DNA‐positive, anti‐HCV‐negative cirrhotic patients, pair‐matched for age (±5 years), sex, HBeAg/anti‐HBe status and Child‐Pugh class. Patients in both groups were previously untreated with oral antiviral agents at enrolment and were treated for at least 24 months (range 24–54). At the 12th and 18th month of treatment, HBV‐DNA was negative in 21 (87.5%) and 23 (95.8%) patients with hepatitis B and C and in 20 (83.3%) and 22 (91.6%) in patients with isolated HBV; all patients in both groups were HBV‐DNA‐negative at month 24 and at subsequent observations. Treatment was well tolerated by all patients in both groups. At the last observation (for co‐infected patients, median 44 months and range 24–54; for mono‐infected patients, median 40 months and range 24–54), a deterioration in Child class was observed in eight (47%) of 17 patients in patients with both HBV and HCV who were HCV‐RNA‐positive at baseline, but in none of seven HCV‐RNA‐negative patients in the same group, and in one patient (4.2%) in the mono‐infected patients. Reactivation of HCV infection was relatively infrequent (12.5% of cases) and never associated with a clinical deterioration. Treatment with nucleotides in HBsAg/HBV‐DNA/anti‐HCV‐positive patients with cirrhosis showed a favourable virological effect in all cases, but a favourable clinical result only in the HCV‐RNA‐negative at baseline.     

Serum HBV RNA is associated with liver fibrosis regression in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients treated with nucleos(t)ide analogues

Noninvasive methods for assessing hepatic fibrosis are clinically necessary. This study aims to explore HBV markers correlated with liver fibrosis and capable of diagnosing significant fibrosis and predicting fibrosis regression. Seventy-four HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients were enrolled and started on entecavir or adefovir therapy. Serum HBV RNA, HBV DNA, HBsAg and hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) levels were measured at baseline and during treatment. Liver fibrosis was assessed at baseline and month 60 by liver biopsy. Fibrosis regression was defined as Ishak fibrosis score decreased ≥1-point. At baseline, HBsAg, HBcrAg and HBV RNA levels had a stronger correlation with Ishak fibrosis score (r = −.441, p = .002; r = −.469, p = .001; r = −.398, p = .001) than APRI and FIB-4 (r = .321 p = .006; r = .371, p = .001). HBsAg >4 log₁₀ IU/ml plus HBcrAg >7 log₁₀ IU/ml or HBsAg >4 log₁₀ IU/ml plus HBV RNA >5 log₁₀ copies/ml exhibited the same excellent diagnostic ability for significant fibrosis with the AUROC of 0.857. After 60 months of antiviral treatment, 66.7% of patients who suffered significant fibrosis at baseline achieved fibrosis regression, and an HBV RNA decline from baseline to month 6 greater than 0.63 log₁₀ copies/ml could predict the fibrosis regression at month 60. In conclusion, serum HBsAg, HBcrAg and HBV RNA are potential markers for predicting significant liver fibrosis. HBV RNA measurement would be particularly useful for monitoring hepatic fibrosis changes in HBeAg-positive CHB patients.     

病毒性肝炎血清HBV DNA和HCV RNA同时检测的探索

本文对ＨＢＶ ＤＮＡ和ＨＣＶ ＲＮＡ用ＰＣＲ方法一次性同时检测技术进行了探索，经过９２例患者血清的检测的结果显示，与同份血清单一ＰＣＲ方法所检测的ＨＢＶ和ＨＣＶ感染阳性总鹰率为９８．１６％，说明此种多重套式ＰＣＲ方法对临床诊断ＨＢＶ和ＨＣＶ感染具有实用价值。     

Immunological biomarkers as indicators for outcome after discontinuation of nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in patients with HBeAg‐negative chronic hepatitis B

The optimal duration of treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) for patients with HBeAg‐negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is unknown. The aim of this study was to identify an immune signature associated with off‐treatment remission to NA therapy. We performed microarray analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMCs) from six patients with chronic hepatitis B who stopped NA therapy (three with off‐treatment remission, three with relapse) and five patients with chronic HBV infection (previously termed ‘inactive carriers’) served as controls. Results were validated using qRT‐PCR on a second group of 21 individuals (17 patients who stopped treatment and four controls). PBMCs from 38 patients on long‐term NA treatment were analysed for potential to stop treatment. Microarray analysis indicated that patients with off‐treatment remission segregated as a distinct out‐group. Twenty‐one genes were selected for subsequent validation. Ten of these were expressed at significantly lower levels in the patients with off‐treatment remission compared to the patients with relapse and predicted remission with AUC of 0.78‐0.92. IFNγ, IL‐8, FASLG and CCL4 were the most significant by logistic regression. Twelve (31.6%) of 38 patients on long‐term NA therapy had expression levels of all these four genes below cut‐off values and hence were candidates for stopping treatment. Our data suggest that patients with HBeAg‐negative CHB who remain in off‐treatment remission 3 years after NA cessation have a distinct immune signature and that PBMC RNA levels of IFNγ, IL‐8, FASLG and CCL4 may serve as potential biomarkers for stopping NA therapy.     

Hepatitis C Virus Reactivation in Anti-HCV Antibody-Positive Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Following Anti-HBV Therapies

Background and Aims: Whether hepatitis C virus (HCV) reactivation occurs and how the viral load evolves in anti-HCV antibody-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who underwent nucleos(t)ide analogue (Nuc) therapies remain unsolved. Methods: A cohort of 66 such patients was studied. Results: At the start of Nuc treatment (baseline), all patients had detectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels (6.05 ± 1.88 log IU/mL), while HCV RNA levels (3.79 ± 1.43 log IU/mL) were detected (i.e., chronic hepatitis C (CHC)) in only 13 patients (19.7%). Following Nuc therapies, HBV DNA levels reached the nadirs at end of therapy (EOT) (6.05 ± 1.88 vs. 0.25 ± 0.99 log IU/mL, p < 0.0001) and relapsed at 6 months after EOT (6mEOT) at a level of 3.45 ± 2.64 log IU/mL compared with EOT (p < 0.0001). Among the 13 CHC patients, a non-significant decrease in HCV RNA was noted at EOT (3.52 ± 1.71 vs. 2.77 ± 2.63 log IU/mL, p = 0.166) but tended to decrease further at 6mEOT (2.77 ± 2.63 vs. 1.89 ± 2.06 log IU/mL, p = 0.063). Two of the thirteen CHC patients showed an increase in HCV-RNA ≥ 1 log10 IU/mL at EOT, and one of the fifty-three patients with undetectable HCV RNA at baseline (i.e., resolved past HCV infection) showed detectable HCV RNA at year 1 (3200 IU/mL) and year 2 (1240 IU/mL) following entecavir therapy. Conclusions: HCV reactivation did occur during HBV suppression, and the rate was 4.5% (3/66), 15.4% (2/13), and 1.9% (1/53), for all patients, CHC patients, and patients with resolved past HCV infection, respectively. The reverse HBV and HCV viral evolutions at 6mEOT indicate that HBV relapse may suppress HCV replication again.     

慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染者低病毒血症的研究现状

低病毒血症（low-level viremia, LLV）通常定义为患者血清HBV DNA水平低于2000 IU/ml且高于检测下限。核苷（酸）类似物如恩替卡韦、富马酸丙酚替诺福韦及富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯等,已被证明可降低肝脏相关并发症的风险,并可阻止甚至逆转疾病进展。但是近年研究发现,部分HBV感染者即使长期接受抗病毒治疗仍会有LLV,并影响其预后,主要表现为促进肝硬化进展以及增加肝细胞癌发生的风险。因此,我国专家认为对于抗病毒治疗1年以上但仍存在LLV的慢性HBV感染者,应及时调整治疗方案。本文在总结LLV的定义、流行病学特征、可能发生的原因、临床危害及应对策略等方面的相关内容进行综述,以供临床医师参考。     

Towards a Functional Cure for Hepatitis B Virus: A 2022 Update on New Antiviral Strategies

Chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) represents one of the main causes of the development of cirrhosis and its complications. Treatment with potent third-generation nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) results in >99% HBV DNA undetectability, and prevents fibrosis progression and liver-related complications. However, NUCs are not able to induce the so-called functional cure, which is hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss and anti-HBs seroconversion. Consequently, NUC treatment is currently intended as being long-term or lifelong, resulting in the need for clinical monitoring and potentially suffering from compliance issues. Consequently, drug development in HBV has the goal of developing new agents in order to achieve a functional cure for HBV. Currently, the three main strategies include the following: inhibition of viral replication, inhibition of viral antigens, and immune modulation. This review summarizes the most recent updates concerning HBV compounds among these three main classes.     

Poor clinical and virological outcome of nucleos(t)ide analogue monotherapy in HBV/HDV co-infected patients

Co-infection of Hepatitis B (HBV) and Delta viruses (HDV) represent the most severe form of viral hepatitis. While treatment with pegylated Interferon alpha (PEG-IFNα) is well established, therapy with nucleoside or nucleotide analogues (NA) has been a matter of debate. We aimed to investigate the role of NA treatment in a well-defined single centre cohort.In a retrospective approach, we observed 53 HDV RNA positive and/or anti-HDV-positive patients recruited at a German referral centre between 2000 and 2019. Patients were followed for at least 3 months (mean time of follow up: 4.6 years; range: 0.2–14.1 years). Patients who had liver transplantation or hepatocellular carcinoma at the time of presentation were excluded. 43% (n = 23) were treated with NA, 43% (n = 23) received IFNα-based therapies and 13% (n = 7) were untreated.Liver cirrhosis was already present in 53% (28/53) of patients at first presentation. During follow-up, liver-related endpoints developed in 44% of all patients (n = 23). NA-treatment was associated with a significantly worse clinical outcome (P = .01; odds ratio [OR] = 4.92; CI = 1.51–16.01) compared to both, untreated (P = .38; OR = 0.46; CI = 0.80–2.61) and IFNα-based-treated patients (P = .04; OR = 0.29; CI = 0.89–0.94) in univariate logistic regression analysis. HBsAg levels declined by more than 50% during NA-based therapy in only 7 cases (7/23; mean time: 3.6 years; range: 0.8–8.5 years) and during IFNα-based therapy in 14 cases (14/23; mean time: 2.8 years, range 0.7–8.5 years). HDV RNA became undetectable during follow up in 30% of patients receiving NA alone (7/23; mean time: 5.0 years; range: 0.6–13.5 years), in 35% of patients receiving IFNα-based therapy (8/23; mean time: 2.9 years, range: 0.3–7.6 years).The effect of NA in patients with HBV/HDV co-infection is limited. Treatment with NA was associated with a higher likelihood of clinical disease progression. Interferon alpha therapy was beneficial in reducing liver complications and improves long-term outcome.     

慢性乙型肝炎患者HBV基因型分布及其耐药基因突变分析*

目的 探讨慢性乙型肝炎（CHB）患者HBV基因型及其耐药突变发生情况。方法 纳入240例接受核苷（酸）类似物单药或联合或序贯治疗的CHB患者,采用PCR扩增HBV逆转录（RT）区和序列测定鉴定耐药基因突变,采用HBV S基因测序法鉴定基因型。结果 在35例单用拉米夫定治疗的CHB患者中,发生耐药突变14例（40.0%）,突变位点为rtL80I/V、rtVl73L、rtLl80M、rtM204V/I和rtV207I,23例单用阿德福韦治疗者发生耐药突变11例（47.8%）,突变位点为rtAl81T/V、rtS213T/N、rtV214A、rtQ215S/H/P、rtl233V、rtN236T、rtP237H和rtN/H238A/K/D/S,70例单用恩替卡韦治疗者发生耐药突变10例（14.3%）,突变位点为rtM204I,12例单用替比夫定治疗者发生耐药突变5例（41.7%）,突变位点为rtI169T、rtL180M、rtT184G/S/A/I/L/F、rtS202I/G、rtM204V和rtM250V/I/L,100例接受联合或序贯治疗者发生耐药突变51例（51.0%）,突变位点为rtA194T,恩替卡韦治疗患者耐药突变发生率最低（P<0.05）;240例CHB患者中,HBV基因B型21例（8.8%）、C型216例（90.0）和D型3例（1.2%）;在发生耐药突变的91例患者中,B型6例（6.6%）、C型83例（91.2%）和D型2例（2.2%,x²=1.22,P>0.05）;在发生耐药突变的6例B型感染者中有2例（33.3%）和83例C型感染者中有15例（18.1%）发生了多重耐药突变。结论 检测CHB患者感染HBV基因型并及时获得耐药突变基因分布,将有助于指导临床治疗。     

Baseline HBsAg and HBcrAg titres allow peginterferon‐based ‘precision medicine’ in HBeAg‐negative chronic hepatitis B patients

Quantitative hepatitis B core‐related antigen (qHBcrAg) has been proposed as an additional marker to quantitative HBsAg (qHBsAg), for management of chronic hepatitis B. Evaluate baseline combination of qHBsAg and qHBcrAg for identification of patients that could benefit from pegylated interferon‐alpha‐2a (PegIFN)‐based therapy. Sixty‐two HBeAg‐negative patients treated with PegIFN or PegIFN plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (PegIFN+TDF). HBsAg and HBcrAg titres were evaluated at baseline. Thirty patients received PegIFN and 32 PegIFN+TDF. SR was 10 of 30 and 17 of 32 in PegIFN and PegIFN+TDF patients, respectively. Cut‐offs determined by maximized Youden's index for identifying patients likely to respond to therapy were as follows: 3.141 log₁₀ IU/mL and 3.450 log₁₀ U/mL for HBsAg and HBcrAg, respectively. At the end of 3 years post‐treatment follow‐up, HBsAg loss was observed in 7 of 30 and 6 of 32 in PegIFN and PegIFN+TDF patients, respectively. The AUC was estimated to be 0.716 (95% CI [0.578, 0.855]) for HBsAg and 0.668 (95% CI [0.524, 0.811]) for HBcrAg (P=.5541). PPVs for AUCs(95%CI) were 0.762(0.590–0.947), 0.714(0.533–1.000) and 0.800(0.611–1.000), and NPVs for AUCs(95%CI) were 0.756(0.660–0.899), 0.718(0.630–0.857) and 0.765(0.675–0.889) for qHBsAg, qHBcrAg and the combination of both markers, respectively. Baseline qHBsAg 3.141 log₁₀ IU/mL and qHBcrAg 3.450 log₁₀U/mL thresholds used separately or in combination allow prediction of response, prior to PegIFN‐based therapy, with a PPV of 80.3% and NPV of 76.5%. Baseline qHBsAg is predictive of HBsAg loss. Both markers could be used, separately or in combination, for PegIFN‐based ‘precision therapy’. Our results emphasize that the combination of PegIFN alpha‐2a plus TDF with 53% of SR might be an alternative to finite therapy.     

Serum hepatitis B surface antigen monitoring in long-term lamivudine-treated hepatitis B virus patients

Serum hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) levels have been suggested to predict interferon response in chronic hepatitis B. A few data are available on the role of HBsAg measurement in nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) treatment. We retrospectively investigated the relation between HBsAg changes and main treatment outcomes during long-term lamivudine treatment in hepatitis e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B. A total of 42 HBeAg-negative patients were consecutively enrolled in an open-label study on long-term lamivudine monotherapy (150 mg/die). Serum HBsAg levels were quantified every 6 months by Architect assay (Abbott Diagnostics). HBV-DNA was quantified quarterly by real-time PCR (Roche Diagnostics). The median duration of lamivudine treatment was 66 months (20-153). One patient (2%) was a primary nonresponder, 35 (83%) developed virological breakthrough (VB) and the remaining six patients (14%) were classified as long-term on-treatment responders. During treatment, HBsAg levels decreased only in long-term on-treatment responders, while no changes were observed in resistant patients. Failure to achieve a decrease of 0.7 log(10) IU/mL in serum HBsAg at month six of lamivudine had a positive predictive value of developing VB of 90% and a negative predictive value of 100%. These high predictive values were also maintained in the subgroup of patients negative for HBV-DNA at month six. The results of this study with a small sample size suggest a role of on-treatment HBsAg quantification in the management of lamivudine-treated patients. If validated prospectively in a larger patient cohort, HBsAg measurements would be a useful adjunct to optimize antiviral therapy.     

Effects of antiviral therapy on long-term outcome after liver resection for hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma

Background/purpose

We investigated the effects of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) on long-term outcome in patients following curative treatment for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

This study involved 70 of the 76 patients who had undergone liver resection for HBV-related HCC in our department; 6 patients were excluded due to non-curative resection or advanced cancer. The 70 patients were divided into three groups, as follows: 13 patients with high serum concentration of HBV DNA (≥4?log₁₀?copies/mL) and no antiviral therapy (high viral group); 46 patients who received antiviral therapy during the serial follow up (antiviral therapy group) because of high viral concentration (≥4?log₁₀?copies/mL); and 11 patients with low serum concentration of HBV DNA (<4?log₁₀?copies/mL) and no antiviral therapy (low viral group).

Results

Tumor-free survival rate was significantly higher in the low viral group than in the high viral group (P?=?0.0058). Multivariate analysis revealed that a high serum concentration of HBV DNA (≥4?log₁₀?copies/mL) (risk ratio 6.717, 95% confidence interval 1.435–31.434, P?=?0.0156) was an independent risk factor for a short tumor-free survival time. Tumor-free survival rate was significantly higher in the antiviral therapy group than in the high viral group (P?=?0.0478). Multivariate analysis revealed that presence of multiple tumors (risk ratio 2.857, 95% confidence interval 1.403–5.816, P?=?0.0038) was an independent risk factor for a short tumor-free survival time. The cumulative survival rate was significantly higher in the antiviral therapy group than in the high viral group (P?=?0.0025). Multivariate analysis revealed that not undergoing antiviral therapy (risk ratio 0.121, 95% confidence interval 0.024–0.608, P?=?0.0104) was an independent risk factor for a short survival time.

Conclusions

A high serum concentration of HBV DNA (≥4?log₁₀?copies/mL) was a strong risk factor for HCC recurrence after resection of HBV-related HCC. Antiviral therapy with NAs improved the long-term outcome after resection of HBV-related HCC in patients with high serum concentrations of HBV DNA.     

Precore and core promoter mutants are associated with higher HBeAg seroconversion but low disease remission rates in HBV patients treated with nucleos(t)ide analogues

HBeAg seroconversion in HBV patients is considered an important event. We determined precore (PC) and base core promoter (BCP) mutations in 137 HBeAg‐positive nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) treated patients by INNO‐LiPA HBV PreCore assay (Innogenetics). The majority of patients with nongenotype A had PC/BCP mutants present at baseline (P = 0.02). During 29 months of therapy, 45 patients achieved HBeAg seroconversion. Probability of HBeAg seroconversion was higher in patients with PC and/or BCP mutants (P = 0.01). After HBeAg seroconversion, patients with BCP mutants had more HBeAg relapse (P = 0.07), and PC mutants less often achieved HBV DNA < 2000 IU/mL (P = 0.07).     

Effect of nucleos(t)ide analogues on blood lipid profiles in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A cross-sectional survey

This study aimed to explore the effects of the 3 nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) on lipid levels. We retrospectively included patients treated with NAs at 2 centers and collected their clinical data at their visiting points. Differences in blood lipid levels were analyzed by statistical methods, and factors related to hyperlipidemia were discussed. In these 2 centers, the prevalence rates of hypercholesterolemia were 12/181 (6.6%) for tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF)-, 0/158 (0%) for tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-, and 13/182 (7.1%) for entecavir (ETV)-treated individuals (P = .003). The prevalence rates of hypertriglyceridemia were 30/181 (16.6%) for TAF-, 11/158 (7.0%) for TDF-, and 26/182 (14.3%) for ETV-treated individuals (P = .025). In TAF (n = 181, 10 [6, 15] months), TDF (n = 158, 18 [7.5, 45] months), and ETV (n = 182, 24 [10, 60] months) groups, total cholesterol (TC) levels were 4.63 ± 0.91 mmol/L, 3.86 ± 0.61 mmol/L, and 4.53 ± 0.87 mmol/L, respectively; triglyceride (TG) levels were 1.27 ± 0.76 mmol/L, 0.87 ± 0.51 mmol/L, and 1.14 ± 0.67 mmol/L, respectively (P < .001). In multivariate regression analysis, factors associated with hypercholesterolemia were age (adjusted hazard risk [HR] = 1.055 [1.018–1.094]; P = .003) and body mass index (BMI) (adjusted HR = 0.817 [0.669–0.998]; P = .048). Factors associated with hypertriglyceridemia were TAF group (vs. TDF group) (adjusted HR = 0.405 [0.167–0.980]; P = .045), age (adjusted HR = 1.028 [1.002–1.055]; P = .038), and sex (adjusted HR = 0.190 [0.079–0.456]; P < .001). Among the patients treated with TAF (10 [6, 15] months), TDF (18 [7.5, 45] months), and ETV (24 [10, 60] months), the blood lipid levels in the TDF group were lower than those in the TAF group and ETV group, and the occurrence of hyperlipidemia was associated with age, sex, BMI, and different treatment.     

The burden of HBV infection in HCV patients in Italy and the risk of reactivation under DAA therapy

Background

There is increasing awareness of HBV reactivation in HCV-RNA-positive/HBV-coinfected patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) treated with oral direct-acting antivirals (DAAs).

Add‐on peginterferon alfa‐2a to nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy for Caucasian patients with hepatitis B ‘e’ antigen‐negative chronic hepatitis B genotype D

Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) and peginterferon have complementary effects in chronic hepatitis B, but it is unclear whether combination therapy improves responses in genotype D‐infected patients. We conducted an open‐label study of peginterferon alfa‐2a 180 μg/wk added to ongoing NA therapy in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)‐negative, genotype D‐infected patients with hepatitis B virus DNA <20 IU/mL. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients with ≥50% decline in serum HBsAg by the end of the 48‐week add‐on phase. Seventy patients received treatment, 11 were withdrawn at week 24 for no decrease in HBsAg, and 14 withdrew for other reasons. Response rate (per‐protocol population) was 67.4% (29/43) at week 48 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 51, 81) and 50.9% (28/55) at week 96 (95% CI: 38, 66). Median serum HBsAg decreased throughout peginterferon alfa‐2a treatment and was significantly lower than baseline at weeks 48, 72 and 96 (P < 0.001). Decreases in HBsAg of ≥0.5‐log₁₀ and ≥1‐log₁₀ were documented in 19 (44.2%) and 6 (14.0%) patients at week 48 and 6 (10.9%) and 17 (30.9%) patients at week 96. The proportion of patients with HBsAg <1000, <500, <100 and <10 IU/mL at ≥1 timepoint during treatment was 78.6% (n = 44), 57.1% (n = 32), 21.4% (n = 12) and 7.1% (n = 4). Interferon gamma‐induced protein 10 increased from baseline up to week 48, with week 12 levels significantly associated with response at week 48. Addition of peginterferon alfa‐2a to ongoing NA therapy significantly decreased HBsAg levels in HBeAg‐negative patients with genotype D infection (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01706575).