Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: association with a platelet aggregating factor and arterial thromboses.

Eleven patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia were studied. Thrombocytopenia appeared 3-16 days following the initiation of prophylactic or therapeutic doses of heparin. The mean lowest platelet count recorded was 48,000/mm3. When heparin was stopped, recovery from thrombocytopenia began within 24 hours and was complete by ten days. Two patients developed fatal thromboses, and two others had myocardial infarctions while thrombo-cytopenic. In the serum of seven patients, including three of the four with arterial thrombosis, a heparin-dependent platelet aggregating factor was present. The factor caused release of platelet 14C serotonin but did not lyse platelets. It was present in the globulin fraction of all positive sera, and in one serum studied it was isolated in the IgG/IgA immunoglobulin fraction. The factor was not present in 16 normal sera or in the sera of 15 nonthrombocytopenic patients receiving heparin. Our observations suggest that heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is common and that, in some patients it may be accompanied by severe arterial thrombosis. In vivo platelet aggregation is a possible explanation for the thrombocytopenia and the thrombosis in this disorder.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia associated with interleukin-8-dependent platelet activation in a patient with antiphospholipid syndrome

Platelet factor 4 heparin enzyme immunoassay, platelet aggregation test, and serotonin release assay are commonly used to diagnose and confirm heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. We describe a case of recurrent thrombocytopenia appearing in a few hours after each heparin administration and who tested negative for the three assays. Further analysis revealed anti-interleukin (IL)-8 antibodies and IL-8-dependent platelet activation facilitated by heparin, which may explain this unusual case of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.     

Effect of fondaparinux on platelet activation in the presence of heparin-dependent antibodies: a blinded comparative multicenter study with unfractionated heparin

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a complication of heparin therapy caused by antibodies against a complex of platelet factor 4 and heparin. Fondaparinux (Arixtra) is a new synthetic selective factor Xa inhibitor. We performed a serologic study to determine the cross-reactivity of HIT sera with fondaparinux. Using a prospective, blinded study design, 39 clinically and serologically confirmed sera from patients with HIT and 15 control sera were sent to 3 different laboratories, each of which specialized in a particular HIT assay. These include the serotonin release assay, heparin-induced platelet agglutination assay, and platelet aggregation assay. Two of 82 assays (2.4%) performed in the presence of control sera were positive, both with unfractionated heparin. In the presence of HIT sera, 75 of 94 (79.8%) evaluable assays were positive with unfractionated heparin; fondaparinux was significantly (P < .001) less reactive than unfractionated heparin, only 3 of 91 evaluable assays (3.3%) being positive. Using flow cytometry, unlike unfractionated heparin, fondaparinux did not induce the binding of PAC1 and anti-CD62 monoclonal antibodies or of annexin V to platelets with HIT sera. Together, these results suggest that fondaparinux is nonreactive to HIT sera and raise the possibility that the drug may be used for prophylaxis and treatment of thrombosis in patients with a history of HIT.     

Laboratory testing for VITT antibodies

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a highly prothrombotic disorder that like heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by platelet-activating antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4). However, unlike HIT—where heparin at low concentrations (0.1-0.5 U/mL) typically enhances antibody-induced platelet activation, platelet activation by VITT sera is usually inhibited by heparin. Further, conventional platelet activation assays for HIT, such as the serotonin-release assay (SRA) and heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) test, often yield negative or atypical results when testing VITT sera. Nevertheless, VITT (like HIT) is a “clinical-pathological” disorder whereby laboratory detectability of platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies is crucial for diagnosis. VITT antibodies follow 2 fundamental principles of HIT laboratory testing: (1) high probability of a positive PF4-dependent enzyme-immunoassay (EIA), and (2) high probability of a positive platelet activation assay. However, optimal detection of VITT in platelet activation assays requires the addition of PF4, for example, PF4-enhanced SRA (PF4-SRA) and PF4-enhanced HIPA (PIPA). A novel whole blood assay, called the PF4-induced flow cytometry-based platelet activation (PIFPA) assay, exhibits high sensitivity and specificity for VITT. HIT and VITT sera/plasmas differ in their reactivity in rapid HIT immunoassays (90-97% sensitivity for HIT, <25% sensitivity for VITT), consistent with distinct antigen sites on PF4 recognized by HIT and VITT antibodies.     

A diagnostic test for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: detection of platelet microparticles using flow cytometry

Based on our previous observation that heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) sera can generate platelet microparticles from washed platelets in a heparin-dependent fashion, we developed a test for HIT using flow-cytometry to measure heparin-dependent platelet microparticle formation. During the developmental phase of the assay the optimal physical conditions for microparticle generation were defined. 133 sera were then evaluated using the microparticle assay and the serotonin release assay to determine the threshold for defining a positive result that gave optimal sensitivity and specificity. The microparticle assay was then prospectively evaluated against the serotonin release assay in 202 sera referred to our laboratory for HIT testing. Overall agreement between the two assays was 96% (Cohen's kappa = 0.91). When the clinical data were reviewed on patients whose sera gave discrepant results between the two assays, no case of HIT was detected by one assay and missed by the other. The platelet microparticle assay is as accurate as the serotonin release assay and may be a useful non-radioactive test for HIT.     

Effect of aspirin on heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in a patient requiring hemodialysis

Summary The present report describes the management of a 75-year-old uremic patient with delayedonset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and clot formation in extracorporeal circulation. The test for serum heparin-dependent platelet aggregation factor was positive and the serum platelet binding IgG (PBIgG) became elevated after the onset of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. He required continuous exposure to heparin for hemodialysis. One gram of aspirin daily was begun to prevent clot formation in the circuit. Hemodialysis with full heparinization was achieved with no clot formation in the circuit. After aspirin ingestion, the increased level of patient's PBIgG in the presence of heparin and thrombocytopenia were restored to normal. Inhibition of platelet aggregation with aspirin allowed uneventful dialysis in a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Two patients with underlying thromboembolic disorders developed severe thrombocytopenia while receiving heparin sodium; one of these patients developed recurrence of the thrombocytopenia and possible heparin-induced pulmonary emboli when heparin was restarted. In a prospective study of patients receiving heparin in a coronary care unit (CCU), nine of 37 patients developed transient mild thrombocytopenia (platelet counts ranging from 88,000 to 150,000/cu mm). Heparin added to citrated platelet-rich plasma caused platelet aggregation in the two original patients. In three of six CCU patients tested, and in 17 of 87 other subjects, with maximum aggregation at concentrations of heparin likely to be present in vivo during therapy. We herein discuss evidence that suggests that heparin may cause or aggravate thrombosis by causing platelet aggregation. The occurrence of severe heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is well documented, and mild transient thrombocytopenia may be more common than has been recognized. Studies of heparin efficacy should take these responses into account.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: an improved method of detection based on lumi-aggregometry

Summary Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a recognized complication of heparin administration. Early detection of this syndrome is essential in the prevention of immune-mediated thromboembolic sequelae. The ¹⁴C-sero-tonin release assay (SRA) has been used in reference laboratories to identify sera from patients on heparin therapy capable of inducing platelet dense granule release. In an attempt to improve existing methodologies, we employed luminographic detection of platelet-dense granule ATP release as an endpoint of HIT antibody-mediated platelet activation. Sera tested included 10 SRA confirmed positive and five SRA confirmed negative samples (to establish the assay), five samples from patients with thrombocytopenia not on heparin therapy and 34 patients suspected of HIT syndrome. All SRA confirmed positive sera ( n = 19) were positive by the luminographic procedure. 24/26 SRA confirmed negative sera and five sera from thrombocytopenic patients not on heparin therapy were negative using luminography. Two of four sera yielding equivocal SRA results were found to be positive by the luminographic technique. The data suggest that the use of a lumi-aggregometer in the coagulation laboratory to detect HIT antibody-induced platelet activation is a reliable alternative to the SRA. The luminographic procedure is both rapid and sensitive, and does not require the use of biohazardous radio-isotopes.     

Laboratory diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a clinical‐pathological disorder; thus, laboratory testing for the pathogenic platelet‐activating antiplatelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies is central for diagnosis. The “iceberg” model summarizes the inter‐relationship between platelet activation assays and PF4‐dependent immunoassays, with platelet‐activating antibodies comprising a subset of anti‐PF4/heparin antibodies. The platelet serotonin‐release assay (SRA), performed by reference laboratories, has high sensitivity and specificity for HIT (~95% each), and is especially suited for detecting highly pathogenic HIT sera containing both heparin‐dependent and heparin‐independent platelet‐activating antibodies; this latter subgroup of antibodies explains “autoimmune HIT” disorders (delayed‐onset, persisting, spontaneous, heparin “flush,” fondaparinux‐associated). Recently, SRA‐negative HIT has become recognized, in which serum from some HIT patients contains subthreshold levels of platelet‐activating antibodies (by SRA) that become detectable using a PF4‐enhanced platelet activation assay. Unusual immunologic features of HIT include early antibody detectability (at onset of platelet count fall) and antibody transience (seroreversion). Widely available PF4‐dependent enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) have high sensitivity but poor specificity for HIT, although specificity is enhanced with IgG‐specific EIAs and strong positive results; unfortunately, EIA results are usually not available in real time. Automated rapid immunoassays, such as the chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and latex immunoturbidimetric assay (LIA), facilitate real‐time laboratory diagnosis. Recently available likelihood ratio (LR) data for positive (LR+) and negative (LR?) test results allow clinicians to adjust their pretest probabilities for HIT, using Bayesian analysis, into real‐time posttest probabilities that are dramatically increased (test positive) or decreased (test negative). Moreover, (semi‐)quantitative CLIA‐ and LIA‐positive results (weak, moderate, strong positive) can further refine the posttest probability of HIT.     

Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia: Effect of Heparin Platelet Antibody on Platelets

S ummary . The plasma of two patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia has been shown to cause platelet aggregation in the presence of heparin. The platelet aggregating factor was isolated in the IgG fraction of the patients'sera suggesting that it was an antibody. This heparin anti-platelet antibody (HAP-Ab) induced platelet aggregation and release but did not cause platelet lysis, although it fixed complement. Platelet aggregation was inhibited by EDTA and by inactivation of complement. There was a significant production of malondialdehyde (MDA) and thromboxane B₂ (TXB₂) implying a role of the prostaglandin synthesis pathway in HAP-Ab induced aggregation. ADP release also appeared to be involved as apyrase blocked aggregation while hirudin, a thrombin inhibitor, had no effect. The thrombotic complications that have recently been reported in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia may be explained by some effects of HAP-Ab on platelets, namely: the antibody mediated platelet factor 3 release, prostaglandin endoperoxides and thromboxane A₂ (TXA₂) production and platelet aggregation in vivo. These HAP-Ab mediated effects could be inhibited by anti-platelet drugs such as aspirin, indomethacin and dipyridamole and thus may have therapeutic implications.     

The complicated relationships of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and platelet factor 4 antibodies with COVID-19

COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) represents a prothrombotic disorder, and there have been several reports of platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies being present in COVID-19-infected patients. This has thus been identified in some publications as representing a high incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), whereas in others, findings have been tempered by general lack of functional reactivity using confirmation assays of serotonin release assay (SRA) or heparin-induced platelet aggregation (HIPA). Moreover, in at least two publications, data are provided suggesting that antibodies can arise in heparin naïve patients or that platelet activation may not be heparin-dependent. From this literature, we would conclude that platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies can be observed in COVID-19-infected patients, and they may occur at higher incidence than in historical non-COVID-19-infected cohorts. However, the situation is complex, since not all platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies may lead to platelet activation, and not all identified antibodies are heparin-dependent, such that they do not necessarily reflect “true” HIT. Most recently, a “HIT-like” syndrome has reported in patients who have been vaccinated against COVID-19. Accordingly, much more is yet to be learnt about the insidious disease that COVID-19 represents, including autoimmune outcomes in affected patients.     

Rapid determination of anti-heparin/platelet factor 4 antibody titers in the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

PURPOSE: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is mediated by antibodies directed against the heparin-platelet factor 4 (heparin/PF4) complex. Our aim was to investigate whether rapid measurement of anti-heparin/PF4 antibodies could improve the diagnostic workup of patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. METHODS: We examined 148 consecutive patients in our laboratory between January 1995 and June 2001 for suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Clinical data allowed retrospective assessment of the likelihood of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Antibodies against the heparin/PF4 complex were detected by a rapid particle gel immunoassay. RESULTS: Anti-heparin/PF4 antibodies were detected in 69 (47%) of the 148 patients, at dilution titers from 1 to 256. Clinically "likely" or "very likely" heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was significantly more common in patients with titers >or=4 (95% [39/41]) than in those with undetectable antibodies (13% [9/70]; P <0.0001), a titer of 1 (18% [4/22]; P <0.0001), or a titer of 2 (33% [2/6]; P = 0.001). All 19 samples with a positive platelet aggregation test had anti-heparin/PF4 antibody titers of at least 4, including 15 samples with titers >or=32. Thromboembolic complications in heparin-treated patients were significantly more prevalent in patients with titers >or=4 (63% [26/41]) than in those with undetectable antibodies (8% [6/79]; P <0.0001) or a titer of 1 (9% [2/22]; P <0.0001). Of the 11 patients with a titer of 1 who were maintained on heparin, none developed worse thrombocytopenia or thromboembolic complications. CONCLUSION: Anti-heparin/PF4 antibody titers, which can be measured rapidly and reproducibly using a particle gel immunoassay, can be used as a confirmatory test to complement a clinical likelihood score among patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.     

Les thrombocytopénies induites par l’héparine : données récentes

Despite less frequent, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) remains a severe complication of treatment with heparin, and is important to diagnose and manage appropriately. HIT results from an atypical immune response to heparin, with the synthesis of IgG antibodies specific to heparin-modified platelet factor 4 (PF4) which activate platelets, leukocytes and the endothelium. This activation explains that low platelet count is associated with thrombotic events in 50% of patients. The diagnosis of HIT is sometimes evoked because of atypical manifestations (i.e. cutaneous necrosis, amnesia, hypotension or dyspnea following intravenous injection of heparin). Biological assays are always necessary to confirm HIT in case of clinical suspicion, and specific rapid tests are now available for detecting anti-PF4 antibodies. However, their specificity is poor and functional assays such as serotonin release assay or platelet aggregation test are often necessary. Argatroban that is a direct antithrombin drug can be used in patients with severe renal failure and will be preferred to danaparoid sodium in this situation. Fondaparinux is not licensed for treating confirmed HIT and can only be used in case of suspicion. The early detection of HIT is based on the monitoring of platelet count recommended in surgical patients receiving a low molecular weight heparin and in all patients treated with unfractionated heparin.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: laboratory studies

This report describes studies into the pathophysiology of heparin- induced thrombocytopenia. The IgG fraction from each of nine patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia caused heparin-dependent platelet release of radiolabeled serotonin. Both the Fc and the Fab portions of the IgG molecule were required for the platelet reactivity. The platelet release reaction could be inhibited by the Fc portion of normal human or goat IgG, and patient F(ab')2, but not F(ab')2 from healthy controls. These results suggested that the Fab portion of IgG binds to heparin forming an immune complex and the immune complexes initiate the platelet release reaction by binding to the platelet Fc receptors. To directly challenge this hypothesis, we preincubated the serotonin-labeled platelets with the monoclonal antibody against the platelet Fc receptor (IV.3). This monoclonal antibody completely inhibited the release reaction caused by heparin and patient sera, as well as heat aggregated IgG, but did not block collagen or thrombin- induced platelet release. Heparin-dependent platelet release also could be inhibited in vitro by the addition of monocytes and neutrophils, but not by red cells, presumably because the Fc receptors on the phagocytic cells have a higher binding affinity for IgG complexes than do platelets. Platelets from patients with congenital deficiencies of specific glycoproteins Ib and IX (Bernard-Soulier syndrome) and IIb and IIIa (Glanzmann's thrombasthenia) displayed normal heparin-dependent release indicating that the release reaction did not require the participation of these glycoproteins. These studies indicate that heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is an IgG-heparin immune complex disorder involving both the Fab and Fc portion of the IgG molecule.     

Laboratory diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: advantages of a functional flow cytometric test in comparison to the heparin-induced platelet-activation test

Nearly one third of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) will progress to overt thrombosis. Owing to the severity of HIT, a reliable prompt diagnosis is mandatory. In this study 248 consecutive samples from patients referred to our laboratory for HIT diagnosis and 97 specimens from normal controls were prospectively evaluated in parallel using the heparin-induced platelet aggregation (HIPA) test and a flow cytometric (FC) test. The HIPA test resulted in 214 negative, 17 indeterminate and 17 positive samples of patients. The FC method detects activated platelets induced by heparin-immune complexes using the highly sensitive recombinant probe annexin V and pooled platelets from multiple donors. The criteria for positive FC test results included an increase in platelet activiation of at least 11% at 0.3 IU/mL heparin concentration in the tube, and a ratio of more than 1.5 between platelet activation at 0.3 and 200 IU/mL heparin. According to the cut-off level 17 patients who showed indeteminate HIPA test results had 14 negative and 3 indeterminate corresponding FC test results. Only one of these patients (HIPA test indeterminate, FC test indeterminate) had no other obvious medical cause for thrombocytopenia than HIT. Infections or inflammations did not show any association with the FC test results, whereas thromboembolic events displayed a significant patelet activation at pharmacological heparin concentration. Therefore the FC test is associated to the complications of HIT. In conclusion, the FC test, which is fast and practical, showed a good agreement with the HIPA test and may be an accurate and useful test for HIT.     

Heparin-induced multiple electrode aggregometry is a promising and useful functional tool for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia diagnosis: Confirmation in a prospective study

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially lethal adverse effect of heparin therapy. Accurate and rapid HIT laboratory diagnosis when HIT is suspected is crucial. The combination of an immunological assay with a functional test improves the accuracy of HIT, but functional assays are currently limited to a few laboratories. Multiplate® analyzer (Dynabyte, Munich, Germany) is a practical, semi-automated and easy-to-perform platelet aggregation assay. The aim of this study is to explore whether heparin-induced platelet aggregation in whole blood assessed by Multiplate® (Heparin-induced multiple electrode aggregometry, HIMEA) can replace platelet aggregation test (PAT) in platelet-rich plasma. For this purpose, HIMEA performance in HIT diagnosis was prospectively evaluated. HIMEA and PAT were compared to serotonin-release assay (SRA) in 200 well-characterized consecutive patients suspected for HIT. HIMEA was found to be more sensitive (81% vs. 76%) and more specific (99% vs. 96%) than PAT compared to SRA. Both tests showed a high negative predictive value while HIMEA had a better positive predictive value. HIMEA has overall better performance characteristics than PAT for the detection of HIT platelet-activating antibodies. The combination of an immunological assay with HIMEA could be a feasible option in non-specialized laboratories for HIT diagnosis optimization.     

Inhibition of coagulation and thrombin-induced platelet activities by a synthetic dodecapeptide modeled on the carboxy-terminus of hirudin

A synthetic, tyrosine-sulfated, dodecapeptide (BG8865) modeled on residues 53-64 of hirudin was found to elevate the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), and thrombin time (TT) of human plasma in a dose-dependent manner. The most sensitive assay was the TT, which was prolonged 2 and 3 times control values at 2.2 and 4.1 micrograms/mL hirudin peptide, respectively. The sulfated dodecapeptide exhibited no dependency on antithrombin III as monitored by the APTT in the presence of sheep anti-human antithrombin III antibodies, and its activity was not neutralized by platelet releasates or platelet factor 4. In studies of thrombin-induced platelet activation, the hirudin peptide was found to block aggregation, serotonin release and thromboxane A2 generation. At thrombin concentrations of 0.25 U/mL, the IC50 (concentration resulting in 50% inhibition) for inhibition of platelet aggregation was 0.72 micrograms/mL peptide. Inhibition of TXA2 generation and serotonin release correlated closely with inhibition of aggregation. Using platelets from patients with clinically documented heparin-induced thrombocytopenia anticoagulant doses of heparin were found to induce platelet aggregation and thromboxane A2 generation. In sharp contrast, anticoagulant-equivalent doses of hirudin peptide had no effect on patient platelets, as evidenced by a lack of platelet aggregation and thromboxane A2 generation. These data provide compelling in vitro evidence that the hirudin peptide has several potential advantages over heparin, namely effective inhibition of thrombin-induced platelet activities, co-factor independence, insensitivity to endogenous heparin-neutralizing factors, and an apparent lack of direct or immune-mediated platelet stimulating properties.     

Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a prothrombotic drug reaction caused by platelet-activating antibodies that recognize complexes of platelet factor 4 and heparin. OBJECTIVE: To describe a syndrome termed delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, in which thrombocytopenia and thrombotic events begin 5 or more days after withdrawal of heparin. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Secondary and tertiary care hospitals. PATIENTS: 12 patients who presented with serologically confirmed, delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, including 6 outpatients presenting after hospital discharge. MEASUREMENTS: The platelet serotonin-release assay was used to measure IgG-induced heparin-dependent and heparin-independent platelet activation; an enzyme immunoassay that detects IgG against platelet factor 4-heparin complexes was also used. RESULTS: Patients with delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia presented with thrombocytopenia and associated thrombosis a mean of 9.2 days (range, 5 to 19 days) after stopping heparin therapy. Nine patients received additional heparin, with further decrease in platelet counts. Compared with controls, patients with delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia had higher titers of IgG antibodies to platelet factor 4-heparin and greater IgG-induced heparin-dependent and heparin-independent platelet activation. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed-onset heparin-induced thrombocytopenia should be suspected when patients present with thrombocytopenia and thrombosis up to 3 weeks after exposure to heparin. This syndrome could be caused by high titers of platelet-activating IgG induced by heparin.     

L’antiagrégation a-t-elle une place en cas de thrombopénie tardive induite par l’héparine ?

We report a case of type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, which occurred after heart surgery in a 71-year-old female patient with several cardiovascular risk factors. The diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombopenia was suspected because association of multifocal arterial and venous thrombosis and detection of antiplatelet-factor 4 antibodies with a drop of more than 50% in the platelet count. Until diagnostic of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was made, clopidogrel was introduced because of well-documented ischemia in middle-cerebral artery territory. The platelets subsequently increased by near 30%. The diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was finally confirmed a few days later by detection of antiplatelet-factor 4 antibodies associated with a positive platelet aggregation test for unfractionated heparin. Heparin was replaced by sodium danaparoid. These measures did not change the unfavorable outcome and death of the patient. The increase in the platelet count after fortuitous clopidogrel introduction raises the question of the role of antiaggregant agents in association with anticoagulants for the treatment of type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.     

Incidence and clinical significance of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies of the IgG, IgM, and IgA class in 755 consecutive patient samples referred for diagnostic testing for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is usually caused by anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies, leading to intravascular platelet activation. These antibodies can be detected by PF4/polyanion antigen assays or platelet activation assays. While antigen assays are very sensitive and recognize immunoglobulin (Ig)G, IgA, and IgM antibodies, the role of IgM and IgA HIT-antibodies is debated. Platelet activation assays recognize IgG and are more specific for clinical HIT. METHODS: We analyzed sera from 755 consecutive patients referred for diagnostic testing for HIT using a PF4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for IgG, IgA, and IgM and by the heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) test. Clinical information was provided by the treating physicians. RESULTS: A total of 108 of 755 (14.3%) patients tested positive, 105 (13.9%) in the PF4/heparin IgG/A/M ELISA [28 (26.7%) only for IgM/A]; 53 (7.0%) sera were positive in the HIPA, of those 50 tested also positive in the ELISA. In 77 patients sufficient clinical information was provided. Available clinical information for 17 of the 28 patients who had only IgM and/or IgA detected showed plausible alternative (non-HIT) explanations in four of seven who had thromboembolic complications and in nine of 10 who had isolated HIT. CONCLUSION: Detection of IgG, IgM and IgA class antibodies by PF4/heparin ELISA yields a positive test result about twice as often as does a platelet activation assay, with only a minority of the additional patients detected likely having HIT. Thus, there is a potential for considerable over-diagnosis of HIT by laboratories that utilize only an ELISA for diagnostic testing.