Correlation between lipophilicity and triptan outcomes

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that triptans achieving higher central nervous system (CNS) levels should have an advantage in efficacy, if central actions are important. Objective.-Our aim was to correlate the efficacy and tolerability results of triptans with their lipophilicity. METHODS: Data for response and pain free at 2 hours, recurrence, adverse events (AE), CNS AE, and chest symptoms taken from Ferrari et al's meta-analysis publications for the recommended doses of oral triptans were correlated with their lipophilicity coefficients (logD(pH)7.4 = -2.1 almotriptan < -1.5 sumatriptan < -1.0 zolmitriptan < -0.7 rizatriptan < -0.2 naratriptan < 0.5 eletriptan). RESULTS: We found no significant correlation between lipophilicity coefficients and any of the analyzed parameters. There was, however, some correlation between lipophilicity and CNS AE (P = .09, r = 0.74) and, to a lesser degree, with a reduction in recurrence rate (r = -0.36). The r values for response and pain free with placebo correction ranged from 0.04 to 0.34, suggesting almost no correlation between lipophilicity and efficacy variables. CONCLUSIONS: According to this analysis, a higher lipophilicity does not seem crucial to improve triptan efficacy. This physico-chemical property, however, correlates with higher CNS AE and, possibly, lower recurrence rates.     

Eletriptan for the acute treatment of migraine in adolescents: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Eletriptan is a potent 5-HT(1B/1D) agonist with proven efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine in adults. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of eletriptan 40 mg versus placebo in adolescent patients (aged 12-17). METHODS: A multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial was conducted comparing 40 mg of oral eletriptan with placebo for the treatment of migraine in adolescent patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was 2-hour headache response, and a number of secondary endpoints were also evaluated. An exploratory analysis evaluated which clinical and demographic characteristics might be correlated with high placebo response. RESULTS: Of 274 patients who treated a migraine attack, 267 were evaluated for efficacy (n = 138 eletriptan; n = 129 placebo) at 2 hours post-dose. There was no significant difference in 2-hour headache response for eletriptan 40 mg versus placebo (57% vs 57%), and no significant improvements were observed for any of the outcomes at 1 or 2 hours post-dose. By contrast, there was a significant advantage for eletriptan 40 mg in reducing headache recurrence within 24 hours post-dose (11% vs 25%, P= .028), and post hoc analyses showed statistically significant differences for sustained headache response rates (52% vs 39%; P= .04) and sustained pain-free response rates (22% vs 10%; P= .013). The strongest clinical predictor of placebo response was triptan-na?ve status (i.e., no previous use of any triptan). Eletriptan 40 mg was well tolerated in this population, and the profile of adverse events was similar to that observed in Phase III trials in adult patients. CONCLUSIONS: The high placebo response rates reported here for 1- and 2-hour outcomes are in accordance with other studies of triptans in adolescent patients. The evaluation of treatment effect in adolescent migraine might benefit from use of more stringent outcome measures, such as headache recurrence, sustained headache response, and sustained pain-free response at 24 hours post-dose.     

Safety trial with the 5HT1B/1D agonist avitriptan (BMS-180048) in patients with migraine who have experienced pressure, tightness, and/or pain in the chest, neck, and/or throat following sumatriptan

We investigate whether symptoms of pressure, tightness, and/or pain in the chest, neck, and/or throat after administration of the 5HT_1B/1D agonist avitriptan were associated with objective impairment of the myocardial function on 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), continuous ECG (Holter) monitoring, and echocardiography. Migraine sufferers who in two-thirds of alt attacks treated with sumatriptan had experienced chest/throat/neck symptoms were chosen for study. Baseline measures included vital signs, a 12-lead ECG and an echocardiogram. Patients ( n =51) who had no clinically significant abnormality at baseline received a high dose (150 mg) of avitriptan orally outside of a migraine attack. If pressure, tightness, and/or pain in the chest, neck, and/or throat occurred, an ECG was obtained, and a repeat echocardiogram was done while the symptoms were present in order to monitor for impairment of myocardial function. If symptoms of these types did not occur within 60 min after administration of the study drug, a second echocardiogram was obtained. Forty-five patients (88%) reported at least one adverse event and 23 (45%) experienced pressure, tightness, and/or pain in the chest, neck, and/or throat after administration of avitriptan. No clinically significant myocardial abnormalities were observed in any patient, even in those who had experienced the targeted symptoms. No other serious adverse event occurred. We concluded that the typical 5HT_1B/1D agonist-induced chest/throat/neck symptoms are most unlikely to be of cardiovascular origin.     

Efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral eletriptan in the acute treatment of migraine: results of a phase III, multicentre, placebo-controlled study across three attacks

The efficacy, safety and tolerability of the 5-HT1B/D receptor agonist eletriptan (40 mg and 80 mg) in acute treatment of migraine was evaluated in a multinational, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, three-attack study treating 1153 patients. In the initial attack, significantly more eletriptan patients reported headache relief and complete pain relief at 2 h vs. placebo (40 mg 62% and 32%, 80 mg 65% and 34%, placebo 19% and 3%; P < 0.0001). Headache relief occurred faster after eletriptan, with more patients at both doses reporting relief 30 min (P < 0.01) and 1 h (P < 0.0001) after treatment than after placebo. There was a significantly lower recurrence rate with eletriptan 80 mg compared with placebo (P < 0.01). Adverse events for all treatments were generally mild or moderate and self-limiting. Eletriptan 40 mg and eletriptan 80 mg both appear to be effective and well-tolerated acute migraine treatments.     

Eletriptan in the early treatment of acute migraine: influence of pain intensity and time of dosing

This double-blind, placebo-controlled study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of early treatment of a single migraine attack, when headache pain was mild, with two doses (20 mg and 40 mg) of eletriptan. Patients (N = 613; female 79%; mean age 39 years) meeting International Headache Society criteria for migraine were encouraged, but not required, to utilize early treatment, thus providing an opportunity to assess the relative contribution to efficacy of pain severity and timing of dose. For the total patient sample (mild-to-severe headaches), 2-h pain-free rates were significantly higher than placebo (22%) on both eletriptan 20 mg (35%; P < 0.01) and eletriptan 40 mg (47%; P < 0.0001). For the cohort of patients who treated their headache when the pain intensity was mild, the 2-h pain-free rate on eletriptan 40 mg was 68% compared with 25% on placebo (P < 0.0001). Pain intensity at the time of taking eletriptan appeared to influence outcome more than the timing of the dose relative to headache onset. Eletriptan was well-tolerated, with adverse event rates similar to placebo when mild headaches were treated.     

Eletriptan for the treatment of migraine in patients with previous poor response or tolerance to oral sumatriptan

To determine the tolerability and efficacy of eletriptan in patients who had discontinued oral sumatriptan due to lack of efficacy or intolerable adverse events (AEs) during previous clinical treatment (not a controlled trial). Eletriptan is a potent, selective 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist with beneficial pharmacokinetic properties compared with sumatriptan. In a double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled multicentre study, patients with and without aura (n = 446) were randomized to 40 mg eletriptan (E40, n = 188), 80 mg eletriptan (E80, n = 171) or placebo (n = 87) for treatment of up to three migraine attacks. Two-hour headache response, based on first-dose, first-attack data, was 59% for eletriptan 40 mg, 70% for eletriptan 80 mg, and 30% for placebo (P < 0.0001 for both doses of eletriptan vs. PBO; P < 0.05 for E80 vs. E40). Onset of action was rapid, with 1-h headache response rates significantly superior for E40 and E80 vs. placebo (40%, 48%, 15%; P < 0.0005). Both E40 and E80 were significantly superior to placebo, based on first-dose, first-attack data, for 2-h pain-free response (35%, 42%, and 7%; P < 0.0001). Both E40 and E80 demonstrated significant consistency of response, with headache relief rates at 2 h on at least two of three attacks in 66% and 72% vs. 15% on placebo (P < 0.001). AEs were mild to moderate in severity and dose related. The most commonly reported AEs included nausea, vomiting, asthenia, and chest symptoms. E40 and E80 produce an effective response in patients who had previously discontinued treatment with sumatriptan due to lack of efficacy or side-effects.     

Efficacy and safety of eletriptan 20 mg, 40 mg and 80 mg in Japanese migraineurs

This prospective multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of a single dose of eletriptan 20 mg, 40 mg and 80 mg in Japanese migraineurs. A total of 402 adult Japanese migraineurs were diagnosed using International Headache Society (IHS) criteria. At 2 h after a single dose, the headache response rates of eletriptan 20 mg, 40 mg, 80 mg and placebo were 64%, 67%, 76% and 51%, respectively, with all doses significantly superior to placebo ( P <0.05). Eletriptan had a statistically significant dose response for headache relief and pain-free response at 2 h post-dose ( P =0.0011 and P =0.0291, respectively). Most all-causality adverse events were mild and there were no deaths or discontinuations. Saliva samples were used to assess serum eletriptan levels 2 h post-dose. Pharmacokinetic evaluations showed no clinically significant differences between Japanese and Western subjects. Eletriptan was shown to be efficacious, safe, and well tolerated in Japanese migraineurs.     

Effect of high-dose intravenous eletriptan on coronary artery diameter

The goal of this study was to evaluate the coronary vasoconstrictive effects of high doses of eletriptan compared with a standard dose of sumatriptan. Patients with no clinically significant coronary artery disease were randomized to receive high-dose intravenous eletriptan (n = 24) vs a standard dose of sumatriptan (n = 18; 6 mg subcutaneously) vs placebo (n = 18). Serial angiograms were obtained. The primary non-inferiority analysis found equivalence between the mean maximum change in left anterior descending coronary artery diameter for eletriptan, -22%[95% confidence interval (CI) -26, -19], and sumatriptan, -19% (95% CI -22, -16). The change due to placebo was -16% (95% CI -20, -12). No individual cases of clinically significant vasoconstriction were observed. The results confirm that eletriptan has a broad cardiovascular safety margin, with plasma concentrations comparable to three to five times the Cmax of an oral 80-mg dose associated with modest vasoconstriction equivalent to standard therapeutic doses of sumatriptan.     

Eletriptan treatment of migraine in patients switching from barbiturate-containing analgesics: results from a multiple-attack study

The aim of this study was to examine efficacy and tolerability of eletriptan in patients switched from barbiturate-containing combinations (Fiorinal), Fioricet. Migraineurs (n = 160) meeting IHS criteria, with unsatisfactory response in the past year to butalbital-containing combinations, treated up to 16 attacks over 3 months with eletriptan 40 mg. Assessments included headache response and pain-free rates and functional impairment at baseline and 2 h postdose, and global ratings of treatment satisfaction at 24 h. At 2 h postdose, average headache response and pain-free rates were 71% (95% CI, 69-74%) and 37% (95% CI, 35-40%), respectively; 68.5% of patients (95% CI, 65-72%) reported functional response. Within-patient analysis found no efficacy diminution over time (no tolerance). Average headache recurrence rate was 20% (95% CI, 18-23%). Eletriptan was well-tolerated; 6 (3.7%) patients discontinued due to adverse events. There were no serious treatment-related adverse events. We conclude that in poor responders to butalbital-caffeine combinations, switching to eletriptan 40 mg was well-tolerated and efficacious.     

音乐疗法在偏头痛发作期应用的效果分析

[目的]观察音乐疗法对偏头痛发作期病人的影响。[方法]将2011年1月—2011年6月收治的40例急性期偏头痛病人随机分为两组,每组20例。观察组采用常规护理＋音乐疗法,对照组采用常规护理,比较两组病人治疗后的疼痛状况。[结果]治疗后观察组疼痛程度低于对照组（P〈0.05）。[结论]偏头痛发作期病人给予音乐疗法干预,可有效减轻病人头痛,促进病人早日康复。     

Antimigraine efficacy of telcagepant based on patient's historical triptan response

(Headache 2011;51:64‐72) Objective.— To evaluate whether the same or different patients respond to triptans and telcagepant. Background.— Telcagepant is an oral calcitonin gene‐related peptide receptor antagonist with acute antimigraine efficacy comparable to oral triptans. It is currently unknown whether migraine patients who cannot be adequately helped with triptans might benefit from treatment with telcagepant. Methods.— Post‐hoc analysis of data from a randomized, controlled trial of telcagepant (150 mg, 300 mg) zolmitriptan 5 mg, or placebo for a moderate/severe migraine. Responder rates were analyzed according to patients' self‐reported historical triptan response (HTR): (1) good HTR (N = 660): response in 75‐100% of attacks; (2) intermediate HTR (N = 248): response in 25‐74% of attacks; (3) poor HTR/no use (N = 407): response in <25% of attacks, or patient did not take triptans. A limitation of the analysis is that the last subgroup comprised mainly (91%) patients who reported that they did not take triptans, but it was not known whether these patients were triptan‐naïve or had previously used triptans and stopped taking them. Results.— For zolmitriptan, 2‐hour pain relief rates were higher in the good HTR subgroup (116/162, 72%) than in the intermediate (29/62, 47%) and poor/no use (44/111, 40%) HTR subgroups. The 2‐hour pain relief rates were similar across HTR subgroups for telcagepant 150 mg (48‐58%), 300 mg (52‐58%), and placebo (26‐31%). In the poor/no use HTR subgroup, more patients receiving telcagepant 300 mg (56/98, 57.1%) had 2‐hour pain relief than those receiving zolmitriptan (44/111, 39.6%; odds ratio = 2.11 [95% CI: 1.20,3.71], P = .009); the percentage for telcagepant 150 mg (57/119, 47.9%) was not significantly different from zolmitriptan (odds ratio = 1.41 [95% CI: 0.82, 2.40], P = .211). Conclusions.— This suggests that different patients may respond to triptans or telcagepant 300 mg. Caution should be exercised in interpreting the results because of the post‐hoc nature of the analysis (clinical trial registry: NCT00442936).     

Acute migraine attack therapy: comparison of naproxen sodium and an ergotamine tartrate compound

The efficacy of safety of naproxen sodium and ergotamine tartrate were compared for the treatment of acute migraine attack in a randomized, parallel trial with 114 participating patients. At the start of symptoms, patients took either three tablets of naproxen sodium (275 mg each) or one of an ergotamine combination (containing 2 mg ergotamine tartrate, 91.5 mg caffeine, and 50 mg cyclizine chlorhydrate). Patients were followed for three months or until six attacks were monitored, whichever came first. Both medications substantially shortened the duration of migraine attacks and reduced the severity of symptoms. When the test medications were taken within 2 h of onset of attack, naproxen sodium was statistically significantly more effective than the ergotamine combination in reducing the severity of headache pain, nausea, and lightheadedness. The ergotamine combination was associated with significantly more vomiting, need for rescue medication, and side effects than was naproxen sodium. Four patients required discontinuation of the ergotamine combination and one of naproxen sodium. Both patients and investigators rated tolerance for naproxen sodium as superior to tolerance for the ergotamine combination. Naproxen sodium seems to be an effective and safe treatment for migraine attacks.     

2013年广西壮族自治区疑似预防接种异常反应监测结果分析

目的 分析广西壮族自治区(广西)2013年疑似预防接种异常反应(adverse events following immunization,AEFI) 的发生特征,评价广西AEFI监测系统运转情况. 方法 通过疑似预防接种异常反应监测信息管理系统收集2013年广西报告的AEFI个案数据,采用描述性方法进行流行病学分析. 结果 2013年广西报告AEFI个案1050例,广西113个县(区、市)均有AEFI数据报告,县级覆盖率为100%,48 h报告率为95.62%,48 h调查率为98.98%.男女性别比为1.71:1;根据广西2013年免疫规划信息系统中疫苗接种剂次估算,总的报告发生率为4.18/10万剂次,非严重AEFI报告发生率为4.07/10万剂次,严重AEFI 报告发生率为0.11/10万剂次.预防接种异常反应报告发生率为1.50/10万剂次.异常反应的临床诊断以过敏性皮疹、卡介苗淋巴结炎为主.在所有的AEFI中,治愈和好转的占98.67%. 结论 广西的AEFI 监测系统运转正常,要加强AEFI因果关联评估、分类及处理等相关知识的培训工作,确保AEFI监测数据的质量.