Effects of hunger on the responses of neurons in the lateral hypothalamus to the sight and taste of food

Recordings were made from single neurons in the monkey lateral hypothalamus and substantia innominata which had previously been shown to respond with an increase or decrease of their firing rates when the hungry monkey tasted food, and/or when he looked at food. It was found that the responsiveness of these neurons to food decreased over the course of a meal of glucose as satiety increased. When satiety, measured by whether the monkey rejected the glucose, was complete, there was no response of the neurons to the taste and/or to the sight of glucose. The spontaneous firing rates of these cells were not affected by the transitions from hunger to satiety. This modulation of responsiveness to food of hypothalamic cells was specific to them in that it was not seen in cells in the globus pallidus which responded in relation to swallowing and mouth movements, or in cells in the visual inferotemporal cortex which responded when the monkey looked at the glucose-containing syringe. On the basis of this and other evidence it is suggested that the hypothalamic cells described here could be involved in the autonomic, the endocrine, and/or the feeding responses which occur when an animal sees or tastes food.     

Visual responses of neurons in the dorsolateral amygdala of the alert monkey

There is evidence that the inferotemporal visual cortex in the monkey projects to the amygdala, and evidence that damage to this region impairs the learning of associations between visual stimuli and reward or punishment. In recordings made in the amygdala to determine whether or not visual responses were found, and if so how they were affected by the significance of the visual stimuli, neurons were found in the dorsolateral part of the amygdala with visual responses which in most cases were sustained while the animal looked at effective visual stimuli. The latency of the responses was 100 to 140 ms or more. The majority (85%) of these neurons responded more strongly to some stimuli than to others, but physical factors which accounted for the responses of the neurons, such as shape, size, orientation, color, or texture, could not usually be identified. Although 22 (19.5%) of these neurons responded primarily to food objects, the responses were not uniquely food-related. Furthermore, although some neurons responded in a visual discrimination test to a visual stimulus which indicated reward, and not to a visual stimulus which indicated saline, only minor modifications of the magnitude of the neuronal responses to the stimuli were obtained when the reward-related significance of the stimuli was reversed. The visual responses of these amygdaloid neurons were thus intermediate in some respects between those of neurons in the inferotemporal cortex, which are not affected by the significance of visual stimuli, and those of neurons in a region to which the amygdala projects, the lateral hypothalamus and substantia innominata, where neurons respond to visual stimuli associated with food reward.     

The latency of activation of neurones in the lateral hypothalamus and substantia innominata during feeding in the monkey

To investigate whether the responses of neurones in the lateral hypothalamus and substantia innominata associated with the sight of food could control the responses of the hungry monkey to the food, the latency of activation of these neurones by food was measured. It was found that when an electromagnetically operated wide-aperture shutter opened to reveal food or non-food objects, these hypothalamic neurones responded with a latency of 150–200 msec to the food objects, and did not respond to the non-food objects. To measure the latency of the monkey's responses to the food, a visual discrimination task was set in which the monkey could lick a tube to obtain fruit juice if a food-related visual stimulus was shown, but obtained hypertonic saline, which was aversive, if a different visual stimulus was shown. In this situation the typical latencies of the neuronal responses to the food were 150–200 msec, of the lick responses 350–400 msec. and of the EMG activity associated with these lick responses 250–400 msec. Thus the responses of these hypothalamic neurones precede the monkey's responses to the food, and could mediate the feeding and other responses of the animal to the food.It was also shown that a different population of hypothalamic neurones with responses associated with the sight of aversive visual stimuli had response latencies of 150–200 msec.     

Neurophysiological analysis of brain-stimulation reward in the monkey

Neuronal activity related to brain-stimulation reward and to feeding was analyzed in rhesus monkeys and squirrel monkeys as follows. First, self-stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus, orbitofrontal cortex, amygdala and nucleus accumbens was found. Second, a population of single neurones in the lateral hypothalamus was found to be trans-synaptically activated from one or several self-stimulation sites. It was also found that populations of neurones in the orbitofrontal cortex and amygdala were activated from at least some of the self-stimulation sites. Thus, in the monkey, there is evidence for an interconnected set of self-stimulation sites, stimulation in any one of which may activate neurones in the other regions. These sites include the lateral hypothalamus, amygdala, and orbitofrontal cortex. Third, in one sample of 764 neurones in the lateral hypothalamis and substantia innominata which were activated from brain-stimulation reward sites, 13.6% were also activated during feeding, by the sight and/or taste of food. The responses of the neurones with activity associated with taste occurred only while some substances (e.g. sweet substances such as glucose) were in the mouth, depended on the concentration of the substances being tasted, and were independent of mouth movements made by the monkeys. Fourth, the responses of these neutrones occurre to food when the monkeys were hungry, but not when they were satiated. Fifth, self-stimulation occurred in the region of these neurones in the lateral hypothalamus and substantia innominata, and was attenuated by satiety. These results suggest that self-stimulation of some brain sites occurs because of activation of neurones in the lateral hypothalamus and substantia innominata activated by the sight and/or taste of food in the hungry animal, and that these neurones are involved in responses to food reward.     

Sensory-specific satiety: Food-specific reduction in responsiveness of ventral forebrain neurons after feeding in the monkey

It has been shown previously that some neurons in the lateral hypothalamus and substantia innominata respond to the sight of food, others to the taste of food, and others to the sight or taste of food, in the hungry monkey. It is shown here that feeding to satiety decreases the responses of hypothalamic neurons to the sight and/or taste of a food on which the monkey has been satiated, but leaves the responses of the same neurons to other foods on which the monkey has not been satiated relatively unchanged. This suggests that the responses of these neurons in the ventral forebrain are related to sensory-specific satiety, an important phenomenon which regulates food intake. In sensory-specific satiety, the pleasantness of the sight or taste of a food becomes less after it is eaten to satiety, whereas the pleasantness of the sight or taste of other foods which have not been eaten is much less changed; correspondingly, food intake is greater if foods which have not already been eaten to satiety are offered.     

Activity of neurones in the inferotemporal cortex of the alert monkey.

The activity of neurones in the inferotemporal cortex of the alert rhesus monkey was recorded while the monkey was shown visual stimuli, which included both food and non-food objects for comparison with the activity of neurones in the lateral hypothalamus and substantia innominata. In the anteroventral part of the inferotemporal cortex, neurones were found with visual responses which were sustained while the animal looked at the appropriate visual stimuli. The latency of the responses was 100 msec or more. The majority (96/142 or 68%) of these neurones responded more strongly to some stimuli than to others. These units usually had different responses when objects were shown from different views, and physical factors such as shape, size, orientation, colour and texture appeared to account for the responses of some of these units. Association of visual stimuli with a food reward (glucose solution) or an aversive taste (5% saline solution) did not affect the magnitude of the responses of the neurones to the stimuli either during the learning or after the period of learning. Nor did feeding the monkey to satiety affect the responses of the neurones to their effective stimuli.     

Learning and memory is reflected in the responses of reinforcement-related neurons in the primate basal forebrain

Certain basal forebrain neurons encode the learned reinforcement value of objects: they respond differentially to visual stimuli that signal availability of fruit juice (positively reinforcing) or saline (negatively reinforcing) obtained by lick responses in visual discrimination tasks. In this report we describe the rapid, learning-related changes in the responses of these neurons during the acquisition and reversal of the reinforcement contingency of a visual discrimination reversal task. The same neurons also responded differentially to novel and familiar stimuli in 2 recognition memory tasks, in which monkeys applied the learned rule that lick responses to novel stimuli elicited saline and responses to familiar stimuli elicited juice. These differential responses to novel and familiar stimuli thus reflected the reinforcement value of the stimuli. A single presentation of a novel or a familiar stimulus was sufficient to elicit a differential response which was maintained even when the stimulus had not been seen recently. The maintenance of the differential response indicates that these neurons are influenced by a durable memory for the stimuli, estimated to be 30 trials on average. These differential neurons were recorded in the substantia innominata, the diagonal band of Broca, and a periventricular region of the basal forebrain. The responses of the reinforcement-related neurons in these 3 regions were similar in most respects. These results support the conclusion that basal forebrain neurons respond to sensory stimuli that, through learning of different contingencies, signal the availability of reinforcement. We suggest that the properties of learning and memory reflected in these neuronal responses are due to afferent pathways from ventromedial regions of the prefrontal and temporal cortices and the amygdala, and that the responses of these neurons provide an enabling mechanism that facilitates the operation of diverse cortical regions in which specific sensory, motor, or mnemonic functions take place.     

Comparative effects of ibotenic acid- and quisqualic acid-induced lesions of the substantia innominata on attentional function in the rat: further implications for the role of the cholinergic neurons of the nucleus basalis in cognitive processes

Two experiments examined the effects of excitotoxic lesions of the substantia innominata on cholinergic activity in the neocortex and on performance in a paradigm measuring selective attention in the rat. In Expt. 1, ibotenate-induced lesions produced approximately 30% reductions in cortical choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) activity, and damage to wide regions of the substantia innominata and ventral pallidum. The rats were impaired in their ability to localize brief visual targets in a serial reaction time task, as measured by reduced choice accuracy. This impairment was particularly evident at short stimulus durations, but the lesioned rats did not exhibit evidence of primary visual sensory dysfunction and exhibited only minor deficits when the stimuli were presented unpredictably. The deficit was exacerbated when distracting white noise was interpolated into the task. The rats with lesions were also slower to respond correctly, probably resulting partly from the adoption of a speed/error trade-off strategy, and were slower to collect earned food pellets, although they made no more errors of omission than controls. In Expt. 2, quisqualate-induced lesions produced fewer signs of non-specific damage and 50% reductions in cortical ChAT activity. This lesion produced generally qualitatively similar, but weaker effects to those of ibotenate-induced lesions. It was notable that many of the deficits following either ibotenate- or quisqualate-induced lesions lasted for several months after surgery. The results are discussed in terms of the cholinergic hypothesis of cognitive dysfunction. It is argued that lesions of the substantia innominata, including the magnocellular cholinergic neurons of the nucleus basalis of Meynert, produce deficits in attentional processing, which may not result from damage specifically to cholinergic cells. However, the longevity of the effects makes these preparations suitable for further exploration of the restorative effects of cholinergic treatments.     

Responses of hippocampal formation neurons in the monkey related to delayed spatial response and object-place memory tasks

The memory for where in the environment a particular visual stimulus has been seen is one of the types of memory relatively specifically impaired by hippocampal damage in primates including man. In order to investigate what processing might be performed by the hippocampus related to this type of memory, the activity of hippocampal neurons was recorded while monkeys performed an object-place memory task. In this task, the monkey was shown a sample stimulus in one position on a video screen, there was a delay of 2 s, and then the same or a different stimulus was shown in the same or in a different position. The monkey remembered the sample and its position, and if both matched the delayed stimulus, he licked to obtain fruit juice. Of the 600 neurons analysed in this task, 3.8% responded differently for the different spatial positions, with some of these responding differentially during the sample presentation, some in the delay period, and some in the match period. Thus some hippocampal neurons respond differently for stimuli shown in different positions in space, and some respond differently when the monkey is remembering different positions in space. In addition some of the neurons responded to a combination of object and place information, in that they responded only to a novel object in a particular place. These neuronal responses were not due to any response being made or prepared by the monkey, for information about which behavioral response was required was not available until the match stimulus was shown. This is the first demonstration that some hippocampal neurons in the primate have activity related to the spatial position of stimuli. The activity of these neurons was also measured in a delayed spatial response task, in which the monkey was shown a stimulus in one position, and, after a 2 s delay when two identical stimuli were shown, had to reach to touch the stimulus which was in the position in which it had previously been seen. It was found that the majority of the neurons which responded in the object-place memory task did not respond in the delayed response task. Instead, a different population of neurons (5.7% of the total) responded in the delayed spatial response task, with differential left-right responses in the sample, delay, or match periods.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Responses of striatal neurons in the behaving monkey. 1. Head of the caudate nucleus

The activity of 394 neurons in the head of the caudate nucleus and the most anterior part of the putamen was analyzed in 3 behaving rhesus monkeys in order to analyze the functions of this part of the striatum. Of these neurons, 64.2% responded in the tests used in relation to, for example, environmental events, movements made by the monkey, the performance of a visual discrimination, or during feeding. However, only relatively small proportions of these neurons had responses which were unconditionally related to visual (9.6%), auditory (3.5%), or gustatory (0.5%) stimuli, or to movements (4.1%). Instead, the majority of the responsive neurons had activity in relation to stimuli or movements which was conditional, in that the responses occurred in only some test situations, and were often dependent on the performance of a task by the monkeys. Thus, it was found in the visual discrimination task that 14.5% of the neurons responded during a 0.5 sec tone/light cue period which signalled the start of each trial; 31.1% responded in the period in which the discriminative visual stimuli were shown, with 24.3% of these responding more to either the visual stimulus which signified food reward or to that which signified punishment; and 6.2% responded in relation to lick responses. Yet these neurons typically did not respond in relation to the cue stimuli, to the visual stimuli, or to movements, when these occurred independently of the task, or when performance of the task was prevented. Comparably, of the neurons tested during feeding, 25.8% responded when the food was seen by the monkey, 6.2% when he tasted it, and 22.4% during a cue given by the experimenter that a food or non-food object was about to be presented. However, only few of these neurons had responses to the same stimuli presented in different situations.It is concluded that many neurons in the head of the caudate nucleus and the most anterior part of the putamen respond in relation to events which are used as cues to prepare for the performance of tasks, including feeding, in which movements must be initiated. Other neurons respond in relation to the stimuli used and the movements made in these tasks. However, the majority of these neurons do not have unconditional sensory or motor responses. It is therefore suggested that the anterior neostriatum contains neuronal mechanisms which are important in the process by which environmental cues are used in the preparation of behavioral responses, and in the initiation of particular behavioral responses made in particular situations to particular environmental stimuli. Deficits in the initiation of movements following damage to striatal pathways may arise in part because of interference with these functions of the anterior neostriatum.     

Afferent connections of the substantia innominata/basal nucleus of Meynert in carnivores and primates

Afferent connections to the substantia innominata/nucleus basalis complex of monkeys and cats were traced by using the method of retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase (HRP). Altogether ten injections of HRP were performed in four monkeys (Saimiri sciureus, Callithrix jacchus, Galago senegalensis) and in four cats, with either vertical or oblique needle approaches. The entire brains excluding the olfactory bulbs and the cerebellum were then screened for labeled neurons. In both monkey and cat brains, many retrogradely labeled neurons could be detected in the amygdala, hypothalamus, midline thalamus, zona incerta, and the fields of Forel. Further but weaker labeling occurred in the medial septal nucleus, diagonal band of Broca, olfactory tubercle, paraventricular, anterior, mediodorsal, and central lateral thalamic nuclei, lateral habenula, ventral tegmental area of Tsai, interpeduncular nucleus, parabrachial, raphe, dorsal tegmental nucleus and the locus caeruleus. Cortically, prefrontal, insular, entorhinal, prepiriform, and periamygdaloid areas of both species showed considerable labeling as well as the whole temporal lobe of the monkeys used. The perirhinal and basal temporal cortex of all cats showed moderate labeling. In both monkeys and cats, extremely scarce labeling occurred within the cingulate, retrosplenial, and subicular cortex. From an anatomical point of view, the manifold connections of the substantia innominata/basal nucleus of Meynert found in this study underscore the participation of these nuclear groups in motivational, emotional, and cognitive (e.g. mnemonic) functions. Considering the widespread cortical efferents of this complex, it is suggested that the substantia innominata/nucleus basalis of Meynert serves the transmission of information arising within the limbic system to the whole neocortex.     

The activity of neurones in the lateral hypothalamus and zona incerta of the sheep responding to the sight or approach of food is modified by learning and satiety and reflects food preference

Single unit recordings were made from neurones in the lateral hypothalamus and zona incerta of conscious sheep during the static visual presentation of food or visible approach of food towards the animal's mouth. The ability of this population of neurones to modulate their activity as a result of learning and satiety was investigated together with the extent to which their responsiveness reflected individual food preference. These neurones did not respond to either the sight or visible approach of a nonsense object or a food which they would not eat. Further, when the sight or approach of food which the animal desired to eat was not paired with ingestion the neurones rapidly extinguished their response. The magnitude of the neuronal response and the number of trials to extinction was dependent upon the animal's preference for a particular food: the most preferred food evoking the greatest response and being the most resistant to extinction. Following extinction the neuronal response to the sight or approach of food could be re-established after one or two trials with food reinforcement. If the sheep was repeatedly given the same food to eat the magnitude of the neuronal response and the number of trials to extinction gradually declined until no response occured when the animal refused to eat. These cells could also be induced to respond differentially to the approach of non-food objects dependent upon whether they were associated with a food reward or not. Thus a response could be evoked to the sight or approach of a black bottle if it was associated with a food reward but not to a yellow bottle unassociated with feeding. Acquired neuronal responses to novel foods could also be demonstrated.     

Modification of the responses of hippocampal neurons in the monkey during the learning of a conditional spatial response task

In order to analyze the function of the hippocampus in learning, the activity of single neurons was recorded while monkeys learned a task of the type known to be impaired by damage to the hippocampus. In the conditional response task, the monkey had to learn to make one response when one stimulus was shown, and a different response when a different stimulus was shown. It had previously been shown that there are neurons in the hippocampal formation that respond in this task, to, for example, a combination of a particular visual stimulus that had been associated in previous learning with a particular behavioral response. In the present study, it was found that during such conditional response learning, the activity of 22% of the neurons in the hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus with activity specifically related to the task altered their responses so that their activity, which was initially equal to the two new stimuli, became progressively differential to the two stimuli when the monkey learned to make different responses to the two stimuli. These changes occurred for different neurons just before, at, or just after the time when the monkey learned the correct response to make to the stimuli. In addition to these neurons, which had differential responses that were sustained for as long as the recordings continued, another population of neurons (45% of those with activity specifically related to the task) developed differential activity to the two new stimuli, yet showed such differential responses transiently for only a small number of trials at about the time when the monkey learned. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that some synapses on hippocampal neurons modify during this type of learning so that some neurons come to respond to particular stimulus-response associations that are being learned. Further, the finding that many hippocampal neurons started to reflect the new learning, but then stopped responding differentially (the transient neurons), is consistent with the hypothesis that the hippocampal neurons with large sustained changes in their activity inhibited the transient neurons, which then underwent reverse learning, thus providing a competitive mechanism by which not all neurons are allocated to any one learned association or event.     

Subset of neurons characterized by the presence of NADPH-diaphorase in human substantia innominata

The substantia innominata encompasses an area of the basal forebrain that is ventral to the lenticular nucleus and anterior commissure, medial to the claustrum and external capsule, and lateral to the hypothalamus. The nucleus basalis of Meynert consists primarily of large acetylcholinesterase (AchE)-positive neurons embedded within the substantia innominata. Damage to these neurons may be important in the pathogenesis of cortical dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. In order to characterize other neuronal elements in the substantia innominata and their relationship to the nucleus basalis, we chose to study a biochemically distinct neuronal subset containing the enzyme nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate diaphorase (NADPH-d). The substantia innominata was blocked from six normal brains obtained postmortem and fixed in neutral-buffered formalin at 4 degrees C for 48 hours. Free-floating 50-micron sections from several levels were stained for NADPH-d or AchE activities. Selected sections were double stained for NADPH-d and AchE. NADPH-d activity was present in a network of pleomorphic neurons that extended through all levels of the substantia innominata and into the striatum and amygdala. NADPH-d neurons were particularly numerous at the level of the anterior commisure and were closely associated with the cholinergic neurons of the nucleus basalis. They were not seen in the ventral pallidum, or the vertical limb of the diagonal band of Broca or in the islands of Calleja. The cell bodies of NADPH-d neurons were quite varied in shape, ranging from ovoid to fusiform, and about half the cells were bipolar. Where neuronal density was high, their dendrites formed an interlacing pattern. NADPH-d-positive fibres were seen coursing through the external capsule, hypothalamus, and amygdala. This novel set of neurons in the substantia innominata may be part of a more extensive network that interacts with the magnocellular basal forebrain system at the level of the nucleus basalis. Whether other neurotransmitters are present within these neurons and whether NADPH-d neurons are involved in Alzheimer's disease remain to be elucidated.     

Activity of neurons in the region of the substantia nigra during feeding in the monkey.

The activity of single neurons in the region of the substantia nigra of the monkey was recorded during feeding to investigate their function in ingestive behavior. It was observed that some neurons in the substantia nigra and the adjacent tegmentum altered their activity during feeding, in relation to mouth movements. The activity of these neurons was related to mouth movements in that the responses of the units were similar when the monkeys drank fluids with different tastes as long as the same movements were made, in that equally good responses could be obtained when the monkey moved his mouth to non-food objects, and in that in some units opposite responses were obtained when ipsilateral as compared with contralateral mouth movements were made. It was also shown that the responses of these units associated with mouth movements were similar when the monkeys were hungry and when they were satiated. These findings suggest that the activity of some neurons in the region of the substantia nigra is related to the execution of movements which may be involved in feeding, and that the activity of these neurons is not related to the initiation of feeding. Self-stimulation through the recording microelectrodes could be obtained just dorsal to the substantia nigra, but the neural basis of this self-stimulation is not known.     

Activity of neurons in the ventral tegmental region of the behaving monkey

To investigate the functions of neurons in the ventral tegmental area, recordings were made of the activity of 257 single neurons in this area in the behaving monkey. Four main types of neuronal response were found in the ventral part of the tegmentum. First, neurons with activity phasically related to mouth or arm movements were found. Most of these were located relatively far lateral, close to the junction of the midbrain reticular formation with the zona incerta, or were in the substantia nigra, pars reticulata. Second, neurons were found which responded differentially in a visual discrimination task on trials on which the monkey had to initiate a licking response compared with trials on which he did not, and which also altered their firing rate tonically while mouth movements were being made in other situations (differential motor neurons). These were found mainly in the midbrain reticular formation, consistent with the view that populations of neurons in these regions are involved in the execution of movements. Third, neurons which also responded differentially in the visual discrimination task, but did not respond when the same movements were made in other situations, were found in the ventral tegmental area, in a region medial to and in some cases immediately dorsal to the substantia nigra pars compacta. Fourth, neurons which responded to cues such as a tone which enabled the monkey to prepare for performance on each trial of the visual discrimination task were found in the ventral tegmental area close to the midline. These third and fourth types of neurons were thus found in the region where neurons of the mesocortical and mesolimbic pathways are located. Their responses are similar to those of neurons found in the striatum, and it is suggested that they are important in enabling the animal to prepare for and then to engage in particular behavioral responses.     

Ultrastructure of neurons in the nucleus basalis of Meynert in squirrel monkey

The nucleus basalis of Meynert in the squirrel monkey exhibits numerous labeled neurons following the retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase from occipital cortical injection sites. The typically large, often clustered, labeled cells are seen most frequently in association with the fibrous bordering structures of the substantia innominata and in the internal and external laminae of the globus pallidus. Ultrastructurally the copious cytoplasm of nucleus basalis neurons abounds with organelles. Large, vacuolated lipofuscin granules proliferate as a function of age and are not evident in younger monkeys. Approximately 4% of the somal surface is occupied by symmetrical synapses with either flat or pleomorphic vesicles. The remainder is covered mostly by neuroglial processes. Somatic spines bearing synapses are occasionally observed. In the neuropil surrounding nucleus basalis somata, the synapses onto dendrites and spines are mostly asymmetrical with large, round vesicles. Labeled nucleus basalis cells in the substantia innominata immediately lateral to the optic tract are larger and rounder than cells in the internal and external pallidal laminae. However, no remarkable ultrastructural differences were observed between nucleus basalis somata in the substantia innominata and external pallidal lamina, or between horseradish peroxidase-labeled and unlabeled large cells.     

Glutamate-induced vocalization in the squirrel monkey

In the squirrel monkey, 164 brain sites yielding vocalization when electrically stimulated were tested for their capability to produce vocalization when injected with mono-sodium-L-glutamate. The sites were located in the anterior limbic cortex, n. accumbens, substantia innominata, amygdala, n. striae terminalis, hypothalamus, midline thalamus, field H of Forel, substantia nigra, periventricular and periaqueductal gray, inferior colliculus, reticular formation of midbrain, pons and medulla, inferior olive, lateral reticular nucleus and nucleus of solitary tract. Of the 164 sites tested, 31 were positive. These were located in the substantia innominata, caudal periventricular and periaqueductal gray, lateral pontine and medullary reticular formation. While all the calls obtained from the forebrain and midbrain had a normal acoustic structure, most pontine and all medullary vocalizations had an artificial character. It is concluded that: the substantia innominata, caudal periventricular and periaqueductal gray, lateral pontine and medullary reticular formation represent relay stations of vocalization-controlling pathways; the periaqueductal gray represents the lowest relay station above the level of motor coordination; neurons responsible for motor coordination of vocalization lie in the reticular formation around the caudal brachium conjunctivum, the superior olive, n. facialis, n. ambiguus and below the n. solitarius; not all areas from which vocalization can be obtained by electrical stimulation of nerve cell bodies, dendrites and nerve endings (in contrast to fibers en passage) also yield vocalization when stimulated with glutamate.     

Satiety does not affect gustatory activity in the nucleus of the solitary tract of the alert monkey

Feeding to satiety decreases the acceptability of the taste of food. In order to determine whether the responsiveness of gustatory neurons in the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) is influenced by hunger, neural activity in the NTS was analyzed while monkeys were fed to satiety. Gustatory neural activity to glucose, fruit juice, NaCl, HCl and quinine HCl was measured before, while and after the monkey was fed to satiety with glucose, fruit juice or sucrose. While behavior turned from avid acceptance to active rejection upon repletion, the responsiveness of NTS neurons to the stimulus array, including the satiating solution, was unmodified. It is concluded that at the first central synapse of the taste system of the primate, neural responsiveness is not influenced by the normal transition from hunger to satiety. This is in contrast to the responses of a population of neurons recorded in the hypothalamus, which only occur to the taste of food when the monkey is hungry. Thus, NTS gustatory activity appears to occur independently of normal hunger and satiety, whereas hypothalamic neuronal activity is more closely related to the influence of motivational state on behavioral responsiveness to gustatory stimuli.     

Basal forebrain efferents reach the whole cerebral cortex of the cat

Efferent projections from the basal forebrain to the cat's cerebral cortex were traced with the retrograde horseradish peroxidase technique. Different areas of the cerebral cortex of 51 cats were injected with small amounts of horseradish peroxidase. The entire basal forebrain was screened for labeled neurons. Following all injections, retrogradely labeled neurons could be detected in either the medial septum, or the vertical and horizontal limb of the diagonal band of Broca, or the substantia innominata, or in several of these structures. All three basal forebrain structures project heavily to allocortical regions, but only weakly to neocortical regions. An exception is the medial prefrontal cortex which is densily innervated by the substantia innominata (i.e., comparably dense as allocortical regions are innervated by the substantia innominata). Large injections into he basal temporal cortex (including the perirhinal cortex) and into the insular cortex also led to a considerable number of labeled cells in the substantia innominata. The results indicate a widespread innervation of the cat's cerebral cortex by the basal forebrain. This diffuse projection to the cortex has recently been found also in monkeys and rats. Anatomical and functional implications of these projections in the cat are discussed and related to findings in other species.