Cutaneous CD30 positive lymphoproliferative disorders with coexistent epithelial neoplasms: Report of two cases

Primary cutaneous large cell anaplastic lymphoma (C‐ALCL) and lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) are cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders (CD30+ LPD). An association with CD30+ LPD and pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia has been recognized. Additionally, rare reports of epithelial neoplasms such as keratoacanthomas and squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) occurring in association with both C‐ALCL and LyP have been reported. We report two cases of CD30+ LPD with associated epithelial neoplasms; one patient with a primary cutaneous CD30+ LPD and SCC identified within the same lesion, and the other with a keratoacanthoma arising in a lesion of LyP. The pathogenesis of this association is poorly understood although various hypotheses exist. Awareness of the coexistence of these entities will avoid misdiagnosis and incorrect treatment.     

Contribution of longitudinal follow up and clinical pathological correlation in the diagnosis CD30‐positive skin infiltrates

The diagnosis of a CD30+ cutaneous infiltrate is often difficult and requires clinicopathologic correlation. To further evaluate this challenge, initial clinical and histopathologic diagnoses were correlated with final clinicopathologic diagnosis in 44 cases with CD30 immunopositivity. Dermatopathologic evaluation confirmed the initial clinical diagnosis in 65% of the suspected benign cases, all cases of suspected lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP), and 72% of clinically malignant cases. In the 25 patients with clinical suspicion for lymphoma, the histopathologic diagnoses included lymphoma in 18, LyP in 2, CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorder (CD30 LPD) in 3 and hypersensitivity reaction in 2 patients. Clinicopathologic correlation led to a change in three cases diagnosed histopathologically as anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) reclassified as LyP type C, and one patient diagnosed as CD30 LPD clinically evolved as herpes virus infection. Furthermore, five cases reported as CD30 LPD received more specific diagnoses after clinicopathologic correlation (LyP type C in three, and ALCL in two patients). Clinicopathologic correlation is essential in establishing the correct diagnosis of CD30 LPD, in particular the distinction of ALCL from LyP type C. In this setting, the histopathologic diagnosis of CD30 LPD is advisable in the absence of clinical data.     

CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorder: primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma followed by lymphomatoid papulosis

CD30+ large anaplastic lymphoid cells are seen in anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), and also in lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) and other lymphoproliferative disorders. It can be difficult precisely to categorize these disorders with CD30+ cells. We report a case of primary cutaneous CD30+ ALCL with systemic metastases in whom the clinical disease subsequently evolved into LyP. The patient was initially administered cisplatin and etoposide and made a good response. Eighteen months later, recurrent, self-healing cutaneous small nodules appeared around the original tumour site without any systemic involvement. Histopathological examination of the recurrent lesions revealed infiltration with a mixture of cells that included neutrophils, eosinophils and CD30+ large anaplastic cells cytologically identical with those in the primary lesion. The anaplastic cells in both the primary and recurrent lesions were positive for monoclonal antibodies CD30, CD25 and a monoclonal antibody directed against the chimeric protein p80(NPM-ALK). These observations suggest the possibility that the ALCL and the subsequent LyP represent different clinical manifestations of proliferation of the same clone.     

CD30+ clonal T‐cell lymphoid proliferation of the skin in a patient with hypereosinophilic syndrome

We report a hitherto undescribed unusual CD30+ clonal T‐cell proliferation in a 46‐year‐old man with the lymphocytic variant of hypereosinophilic syndrome with a 17‐year history of pruritus, generalized persistent papulonodular skin lesions and peripheral blood hypereosinophilia. A skin biopsy showed an eosinophil‐rich infiltrate with small to medium‐sized CD30+ lymphocytes and Churg‐Strauss granulomas. Peripheral blood flow cytometry revealed an aberrant T‐cell clone which, molecular genetically, was identical to the T‐cell clone detected in the skin. No genetic aberrations of platelet‐derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA), FIP1L1‐PDGFRA, PDGFRB or FGFR1 were found. The skin lesions showed transient response to systemic and topical corticosteroids. The skin lesions represent cutaneous involvement by clonal T‐cells in hypereosinophilic syndrome and differ from known cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders.     

CD30-positive lymphoproliferative disorders—An Australian Clinical Practice Statement from the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

The CD30-postive lymphoproliferative disorders, including lymphomatoid papulosis and primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma, account for up to 30% of all cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) and are the second most common form of CTCLs after mycosis fungoides. Both conditions differ in their clinical presentations; however, they share the expression of the CD30 antigen as a common immunophenotypic hallmark. There is a wide spectrum of management options depending on factors such as extent of disease, staging and treatment tolerability. This Clinical Practice Statement is reflective of the current clinical practice in Australia.     

CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorder with spindle‐cell morphology

Lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) is classified as a CD30+ primary cutaneous lymphoproliferative disease. The phenotypic variability along the spectrum of CD30+ lymphoproliferative diseases is highlighted by the distinct histologic subtypes of LyP types A, B, C, and the more recently described types D, E, and F. We report the case of an elderly woman with a clinical presentation and histopathologic findings consistent with LyP, whose atypical CD30+ infiltrate uniquely demonstrated a spindle‐cell morphology. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of LyP characterized by CD30+ spindle‐shaped cells, and may represent a new and distinct histologic variant of LyP.     

MUM1 expression in cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders: a valuable tool for the distinction between lymphomatoid papulosis and primary cutaneous anaplastic large-cell lymphoma

Background Primary cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders include lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) and primary cutaneous CD30+ anaplastic large T‐cell lymphoma (ALCL). Because of overlapping histological features, it is impossible to distinguish ALCL from LyP on histological grounds. MUM1 (Multiple Myeloma oncogene 1) is expressed in systemic ALCL and classical Hodgkin lymphoma. MUM1 expression has not been studied in detail in CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders. Objectives To examine the expression of MUM1 in CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders and to assess its value as a diagnostic marker. Methods Thirty‐one formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded specimens of LyP (n = 15), primary cutaneous ALCL (n = 10), secondary cutaneous infiltrates of systemic ALCL (n = 4) and secondary cutaneous Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 2) were analysed by immunohistochemistry with a monoclonal antibody against MUM1. Results Positive staining for MUM1 was observed in 13 cases of LyP (87%), two cases of primary cutaneous ALCL (20%), four cases of secondary cutaneous ALCL (100%) and two cases of secondary cutaneous Hodgkin lymphoma (100%). In 11 of 13 LyP cases (85%), MUM1 was displayed by the majority, i.e. 50–90%, of the tumour cells. In contrast to LyP and secondary cutaneous ALCL, only two cases of primary cutaneous ALCL (20%) harboured MUM1‐positive tumour cells. There was a statistically significant difference in the expression of MUM1 between LyP and primary cutaneous ALCL (P = 0·002) and between primary cutaneous ALCL and secondary cutaneous ALCL (P = 0·015). Conclusions MUM1 expression is a valuable tool for the distinction of LyP and ALCL and thus represents a novel adjunctive diagnostic marker in CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders.     

Potential involvement of Notch1 signalling in the pathogenesis of primary cutaneous CD30-positive lymphoproliferative disorders

Background  The central role of Notch signalling in T‐cell development and oncogenesis raises the question of the importance of this pathway in cutaneous T‐cell lymphomas. Objectives  To investigate the pattern of expression of Notch and its ligands, Jagged and Delta, in skin samples of primary cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders. Methods  Immunohistochemistry of formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded skin samples from 12 patients with lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) and 11 patients with primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). Immunofluorescence studies of fresh skin samples obtained from three patients with LyP and two patients with primary cutaneous ALCL. Results  We identified single Notch1‐positive cells or small clusters of atypical cells in LyP. Similarly, strongly positive Jagged1 cells tended to be localized in clusters. Primary cutaneous ALCL had higher expression of Notch1 and Jagged1 compared with LyP. Cells expressing Notch1 and Jagged1 were colocalized and a subset of cells expressed both the receptor and the ligand. The expression of the ligand Delta1 was low to undetectable in both types of lymphoproliferations. A subpopulation of lymphoma cells was found to coexpress Notch1 and activated Akt kinase. Conclusions  These results imply a potential role for the Notch signalling pathway in the pathogenesis of primary cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders and provide a rationale for the exploration of the activity of Notch antagonists in the therapy of these diseases.     

Expression of chemokines and chemokine receptors in cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the mechanisms involved in skin-specific homing in CD30+ cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders (CLPD). Chemokine/chemokine receptor interactions have been implicated in the homing of lymphoma cells to various tissue sites. OBJECTIVES: To investigate tissue samples from patients with CD30+ CLPD for the expression of the chemokine receptors CXCR3, CCR4 and CCR3 and their ligands MIG, TARC and RANTES. METHODS: Tissue samples from patients with primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (PCALCL, n=12) and lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP, n=13) were studied by immunohistochemistry on paraffin-embedded sections. Immunohistochemical analysis was also performed for CD20 (for B cells), CD45RO and CD3 (for T cells), CD30 and ALK-1. A portion of each skin specimen was stored at -80 degrees C and later examined using monoclonal antibodies against CD2, CD3, CD4, CD5, CD8, CD15, CD19, CD20 and CD30. RESULTS: CD30+ atypical lymphoid cells were frequently seen in PCALCL, and to a variable degree in LyP. In both disorders there were scattered CD3+ and CD45RO+ atypical lymphoid cells, but CD2, CD5, CD15, CD19, CD20 and ALK-1 showed negative reactivity. In addition, CD4+, but not CD8+, atypical lymphoid cells were occasionally seen in both disorders. CCR3 was expressed by atypical lymphoid cells in 10 of 12 (83%) cases of PCALCL, but in only five of 13 (38%) cases of LyP. CXCR3 was expressed in 11 of 13 (85%) cases of LyP, but in only one of 12 (8%) cases of PCALCL. CCR4 was expressed in 11 of 12 (92%) cases of PCALCL, but in only two of 13 (15%) cases of LyP. RANTES was strongly expressed by lymphoma cells in PCALCL (11 of 12: 92%), but was weak or sporadic in LyP (seven of 13: 54%). TARC showed weak or sporadic reactivity in both LyP and PCALCL, and MIG did not show a distinctive expression pattern in either disorder. CONCLUSIONS: We speculate that CCR3 is associated with the autocrine function in PCALCL, as evidenced by CCR3 coexpression with its ligand RANTES. We also found that LyP cells expressed CXCR3, which might support their migration towards the CXCR3 ligand MIG, which is expressed in stromal cells of the skin.     

Disseminated CD8‐positive,CD30‐positive cutaneous lymphoproliferative eruption with overlapping features of mycosis fungoides and primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma following remote solitary lesional presentation

CD8‐positive, CD30‐positive cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders constitute a rare subset of T‐cell lymphoproliferative conditions, including variants of primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), mycosis fungoides, lymphomatoid papulosis type D, cutaneous gamma‐delta T‐cell lymphoma and cutaneous peripheral T‐cell lymphoma. These entities share overlapping clinical, histopathologic and immunophenotypic features, presenting both a clinical and pathological diagnostic challenge. Presented here is a 73‐year‐old man with a disseminated, indolent CD30+, CD8+ cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorder with overlapping clinical and histopathological features of both mycosis fungoides and primary cutaneous ALCL, as well as features of lymphomatoid papulosis. To our knowledge, this is the first case of a generalized CD8+, CD30+ eruption with features of both mycosis fungoides and primary cutaneous ALCL arising following an episode of solitary primary cutaneous CD8‐positive ALCL.     

Acitretin combined with NB‐UVB in the treatment of cutaneous CD30‐positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma

Cutaneous CD30⁺ lymphoproliferative disorders represent a spectrum of skin lymphatic reticular proliferative diseases, including lymphomatoid papulosis (LYP), primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (PC‐ALCL), and borderline lesions between them. Although they all express CD30 as a phenotypic marker and share overlapping immunophenotypic features, they differ in clinical manifestations, pathological features, treatment, and prognosis. LYP is a kind of benign disease characterized by recurrent papules and nodules, and may spontaneously regress. PC‐ALCL presents with solitary tumor or local grouped nodules characterized by large T‐cells and may completely or partially resolve in fewer than half of cases. We reported a case of patient with clinical manifestation and pathologic features consistent with LYP in its early stages, which later turned into PC‐ALCL. This patient was treated with acitretin combined with NB‐UVB and had an obvious response.     

CD56 expression in a case of primary cutaneous CD30+ anaplastic large cell lymphoma

We describe clinicopathological features of an unusual case of CD30+/CD56+ T-cell lymphoma in a 58-year-old Korean man who presented with disseminated nodules, papules and hyperpigmented patches. Coexpression of CD30 and CD56 in T-cell lymphoma is very rare. Our patient did not respond to an intensive chemotherapy regimen, in contrast to the previously reported cases of primary cutaneous CD30+ anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Coexpression of CD56 might therefore identify a subset of CD30+ lymphomas with more aggressive features.     

Clinical spectrum of primary cutaneous CD30‐positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma: an analysis of the Mannheim Cutaneous Lymphoma Registry

Background: Primary cutaneous CD30⁺ anaplastic large cell lymphomas (C‐ALCL) have indolent clinical behavior with an estimated 5‐year survival rate of 95%. The clinical features and disease courses of C‐ALCL identified in the lymphoma registry of Mannheim University hospital are described in the following. Patients and methods: All C‐ALCL patients identified in the database were analyzed in regard to clinical picture, histology, immunohistochemistry, molecular biology, staging, therapy, follow‐up, and outcome. Results: 14 C‐ALCL patients were identified. The mean age was 69 years and 57% were men. Solitary skin lesions in one anatomical region were seen in 12 patients upon initial diagnosis. Two patients presented with multiple lesions at different anatomical sites. In 2 patients there was specific lymph node involvement. In one C‐ALCL patient, follow‐up over 17 months revealed extracutaneous infiltration. Half of the patients relapsed and 36% had multiple episodes. The majority of our patients were treated with surgical excision followed by electron beam radiotherapy. The 5‐year survival rate was 93% in C‐ALCL. Conclusions: The clinical presentation of C‐ALCL varies. Staging procedures and a close clinical pathological correlation at initial diagnosis are essential. Due to a high rate of relapses and the possibility of developing extranodal manifestations over the course of the disease, close follow‐up is recommended.     

A case of mycosis fungoides after CD30 positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma

A 55-year-old woman presented with mycosis fungoides (MF) after the total excision of primary cutaneous CD30+ anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). In the specimens obtained from the nodule of CD30+ ALCL and the plaque lesion of MF, the same pattern of T-cell receptor gene rearragement was detected.     

原发性皮肤CD30阳性淋巴组织增生性疾病临床病理分析

目的 探讨原发性皮肤CD30阳性淋巴组织增生性疾病的临床及病理学特征。方法 对4例淋巴瘤样丘疹病及5例原发性皮肤间变性大细胞淋巴瘤的临床、病理学特征及免疫组化表达进行分析。结果 淋巴瘤样丘疹病分为A、B、C三型,组织学上形成一个连续的谱系,A型见多形性间变性大细胞或Sternberg-Reed样细胞散在分布或小片状分布在多量炎性细胞背景中;B型类似蕈样肉芽肿病变,表现为真皮层较宽的淋巴细胞浸润带,其中散在少量小至中等异形脑回样淋巴细胞;C型以间变性大细胞弥漫分布为特征,但临床上可自行消退。原发性皮肤间变性大细胞以皮下结节或皮肤丘疹就诊,瘤细胞体积大,呈多形性、圆形或椭圆形,胞质丰富,嗜酸或呈双色性,核大,核仁明显。两组病变中的大细胞均特征性表达CD30,预后均较好。结论 原发性皮肤CD30阳性淋巴组织增生性疾病是一组预后较好的皮肤T细胞性淋巴瘤谱系,综合临床表现、组织病理改变、免疫组化有助于本病的诊断。     

原发性皮肤CD30+淋巴细胞增殖性疾病进展

原发性皮肤CD30^＋淋巴细胞增殖性疾病包括原发性皮肤间变性大细胞淋巴瘤、淋巴瘤样丘疹病和一些临界性肿瘤，构成疾病谱系。这些疾病的共同特点是肿瘤细胞表达CD30抗原。这类疾病预后较好．故选择治疗方法时需权衡积极治疗的短期疗效与潜在副作用间的利弊关系。CD30^＋细胞也可在其他疾病中见到，CD30^＋免疫组化结果应结合临床综合分析。     

累及中枢神经系统的皮肤CD30~+间变性大细胞淋巴瘤1例

患者男,75岁,反复皮肤肿块11年。1个月前第3次复发伴语言、记忆和生活自理能力减退。头颅MRI示:左额叶,右顶叶多发占位,颅内淋巴瘤浸润。左大腿肿块组织病理示:真皮内大量异型细胞,体积较大,形态不规则,核扭曲,核分裂相可见;免疫组化:CD3(+),UCHL-1(+),CD30(+),ALK(-),MIB-1>90%。诊断:皮肤CD30+间变性大细胞淋巴瘤。中枢神经系统(central nerve system,CNS)累及可以是皮肤间变性大细胞淋巴瘤发生皮外累及的唯一部位,患者的意识改变是进行CNS筛查的重要提示。