The prodromal questionnaire (PQ): preliminary validation of a self-report screening measure for prodromal and psychotic syndromes

This study aims to establish preliminary validity of the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ), a 92-item self-report screening measure for prodromal and psychotic symptoms. Adolescents and young adults (N = 113) referred to a prodromal psychosis research clinic completed the PQ and the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS [Miller, T.J., McGlashan, T.H., Woods, S.W., Stein, K., Driesen, N., Corcoran, C.M., Hoffman, R., Davidson, L., 1999. Symptom assessment in schizophrenic prodromal states. Psychiatric Quarterly 70(4), 273-287]), an interview with established validity for predicting future psychosis. When maximizing selection of true positive cases, scores on a subset of PQ items that assess positive symptoms predicted a concurrent prodromal or psychotic SIPS diagnosis with 90% sensitivity and 49% specificity. The PQ shows good preliminary validity in detecting individuals with an interview-diagnosed prodromal or psychotic syndrome, but it is less sensitive to the threshold between prodromal and full-blown psychosis.     

The prodromal questionnaire (PQ): preliminary validation of a self-report screening measure for prodromal and psychotic syndromes

This study aims to establish preliminary validity of the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ), a 92-item self-report screening measure for prodromal and psychotic symptoms. Adolescents and young adults (N = 113) referred to a prodromal psychosis research clinic completed the PQ and the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS [Miller, T.J., McGlashan, T.H., Woods, S.W., Stein, K., Driesen, N., Corcoran, C.M., Hoffman, R., Davidson, L., 1999. Symptom assessment in schizophrenic prodromal states. Psychiatric Quarterly 70(4), 273-287]), an interview with established validity for predicting future psychosis. When maximizing selection of true positive cases, scores on a subset of PQ items that assess positive symptoms predicted a concurrent prodromal or psychotic SIPS diagnosis with 90% sensitivity and 49% specificity. The PQ shows good preliminary validity in detecting individuals with an interview-diagnosed prodromal or psychotic syndrome, but it is less sensitive to the threshold between prodromal and full-blown psychosis.     

Psychosis risk screening with the Prodromal Questionnaire--brief version (PQ-B)

In this study, we examined the preliminary concurrent validity of a brief version of the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-B), a self-report screening measure for psychosis risk syndromes. Adolescents and young adults (N=141) who presented consecutively for clinical assessment to one of two early psychosis research clinics at the University of California, San Francisco and UC Los Angeles completed the PQ-B and the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS) at intake. Endorsement of three or more positive symptoms on the PQ-B differentiated between those with prodromal syndrome and psychotic syndrome diagnoses on the SIPS versus those with no SIPS diagnoses with 89% sensitivity, 58% specificity, and a positive Likelihood Ratio of 2.12. A Distress Score measuring the distress or impairment associated with endorsed positive symptoms increased the specificity to 68%, while retaining similar sensitivity of 88%. Agreement was very similar when participants with psychotic syndromes were excluded from the analyses. These results suggest that the PQ-B may be used as an effective, efficient self-report screen for prodromal psychosis syndromes when followed by diagnostic interview, in a two-stage evaluation process in help-seeking populations.     

Differential results between self-report and interview-based ratings of risk symptoms of psychosis

Aim: Assessing potential risk of developing psychosis has gained growing attention in recent literature. The selection of suitable assessment methods is the central question for this research endeavour. Whereas prodromal detection instruments are mostly interview‐based instruments, there are short screening instruments for self‐report use. Methods: Difference in psychosis risk scores was tested between self‐report results and interview results, with risk symptoms of psychosis included in PROD screening instrument. Subjects were recruited by an early intervention team in Finland. Results: There was a significant difference between psychosis risk scores based on self‐report versus interview in a sample of adolescents (n = 87; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Results suggest that when using screening instruments, risk scores and risk status may vary by the method the information is collected. Checking self‐report results by an additional interview is recommended for both clinical and scientific uses.     

The reliability and validity of the korean version of the structured interview for prodromal syndrome

Objective

The Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndrome (SIPS) from Yale University is intended to diagnose prodromal syndrome of psychosis and to measure the severity of prodromal symptoms. Here, a Korean version of SIPS is presented, and its reliability, validity, and factor structures are examined using a representative Korean sample.

Methods

The Korean version of SIPS was administered to 40 participants over a period of 1 year. The inter-rater reliability and internal consistency of the SIPS were then evaluated. In addition, its factor structure was investigated using principal-axis factor analysis. Concurrent validity was explored using Pearson correlation coefficients with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).

Results

Of the 40 subjects, 12.5% developed psychotic disorders during the 1-year follow-up period. Inter-rater reliability was good (intra-class correlations=0.96), and internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach''s alpha=0.83). A three-factor resolution displayed the best simple structure and accounted for 52.6% of all item variance. Factors 1 and 2 showed strong correlations with negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunction, respectively, on the PANSS. Factor 3 was not correlated with any factor on the PANSS.

Conclusion

The Korean version of SIPS is a reliable instrument for the assessment of prodromal symptoms in subjects and may be used to evaluate prodromal psychosis.     

When things are not as they seem: detecting first‐episode psychosis upon referral to ultra high risk (‘prodromal’) clinics

The current paper examines a neglected function of ‘ultra high risk’ (UHR) clinics: to detect first‐episode psychosis (FEP) mistakenly identified as a prodrome. A clinical audit was conducted of referrals to a UHR service, the Personal Assessment and Crisis Evaluation Clinic, over a 12‐month period (April 2005–March 2006). In this audit, 11.4% of the total number of referrals (n= 149) and 11.9% of those who attended a first appointment were psychotic on referral. These figures indicate that a substantial proportion of individuals thought to be prodromal are in fact suffering FEP. UHR clinics minimize duration of untreated psychosis for FEP patients mistaken as prodromal.     

Prodromal psychosis screening in adolescent psychiatry clinics

Background: Research has identified a syndrome conferring ultra‐high risk (UHR) for psychosis, although UHR interviews require intensive staff training, time and patient burden. Previously, we developed the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ) to screen more efficiently for UHR syndromes. Aims: This study examined the concurrent validity of the PQ against UHR status and preliminary predictive validity for later psychotic disorder. Method: We assessed a consecutive patient sample of 408 adolescents who presented to psychiatry clinics in Helsinki, Finland, seeking mental health treatment, including 80 participants who completed the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS). Results: A cut‐off score of 18 or more positive symptoms on the PQ predicted UHR diagnoses on the SIPS with 82% sensitivity and 49% specificity. Three of 14 (21%) participants with high PQ scores and SIPS UHR diagnoses developed full psychotic disorders within 1 year. Conclusions: Using the PQ and SIPS together can be an efficient two‐stage screening process for prodromal psychosis in mental health clinics.     

The dynamics of symptomatic and non-symptomatic coping with psychotic symptoms in the flow of daily life

Objective: Previous research has suggested that going along with psychotic symptoms (symptomatic coping) is less effective than other coping strategies with psychotic symptoms. This pilot study aims to validate such findings using a momentary assessment strategy of coping with stress in daily life. Method: Patients with psychosis (n = 35) were studied with the Experience Sampling Method (ESM; a structured diary technique) to assess coping with stress in daily life. This was analysed in relation to coping with psychotic symptoms using a previously validated interview (Maastricht Assessment of Coping Strategies). Results: Symptomatic and non‐symptomatic coping were negatively associated with each other. Symptomatic coping was negatively associated with the level of coping in daily life, whereas a positive association was apparent for non‐symptomatic coping. Non‐symptomatic coping, but not symptomatic coping, predicted appraisals of distress associated with psychotic symptoms. Conclusion: Effective coping may be associated with the tendency to develop conscious appraisals of distress associated with psychotic symptoms.     

Intervention to improve level of overall functioning and mental condition of adolescents at high risk of developing first-episode psychosis in Finland

Aim: Being at high risk of developing psychosis has been suggested to be a result of a combination of acute life stressors and trait‐like vulnerability to psychosis. Reducing levels of stress could support overall functioning and mental condition in those at risk. Methods: The Jorvi Early Psychosis Recognition and Intervention (JERI) project at Helsinki University Central Hospital, Jorvi Hospital, Finland, is an early intervention team for adolescents at risk of developing first‐episode psychosis. The project is based on the idea of multiprofessional, community, home, family and network‐oriented, stress‐reducing, overall functioning‐supporting, low‐threshold care. The JERI team meets multiprofessionally with adolescents in their natural surroundings, for example, at school or at home, together with their parents, network and community co‐worker, who has originally contacted the JERI team because of unclear mental health problems. Subjects were assessed with the PROD‐prodromal screen to identify those at risk of developing first‐episode psychosis. Results: Statistically significant difference between baseline and follow‐up measures was found in at risk subjects (n = 28) in scales of overall functioning (P = 0.000), depression (P = 0.001), anxiety (P = 0.001), quality of life (QOL) and pre‐psychotic symptoms. Conclusions: JERI‐type intervention may improve level of overall functioning and support mental condition in adolescents at risk of developing first‐episode psychosis, even though further study with larger numbers of subjects, with a control group and with a longer follow‐up time, is needed.     

Does a parent-report measure of behavioral problems enhance prediction of conversion to psychosis in clinical high-risk adolescents?

Recent research on risk for psychosis has focused on youth who manifest subclinical signs that are often associated with the prodrome to psychosis. Standardized measures of prodromal symptoms have been shown to significantly enhance prediction of risk for conversion to an Axis I psychotic disorder. In the present study, a widely used parent-report measure of behavioral problems, the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) was administered to examine the clinical and diagnostic utility of the measure as an adjunctive screening instrument in the identification of at-risk youth. The CBCL, the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS), and other diagnostic measures were administered at baseline and at one year follow-up assessments to adolescents (n=41) at clinical high-risk for the development of a psychotic disorder. Analyses were conducted to compare the 14 at-risk adolescents who subsequently converted to psychosis to the 27 who did not. Conversion to psychosis was defined as conversion to an Axis I psychotic disorder or affective disorder with psychotic features. Consistent with expectations, at one year follow-up, compared to the Non-Converted participants, the Converted participants manifested significantly higher scores on the prodromal symptom scales of the SIPS. There were, however, no differences in CBCL social and behavioral ratings as a function of conversion status. It is concluded that the CBCL does not show promise as an alternative or adjunctive predictor of conversion to psychosis in at-risk adolescents.     

Distinct and opposite profiles of connectivity during self‐reference task and rest in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis

Self‐reference is impaired in psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia, associated with disability, and closely related to characteristic patterns of aberrant brain connectivity. However, at present, it is unclear whether self‐reference is impacted in pathogenesis of the disorder. Alterations in connectivity during a self‐reference task or resting‐state in the psychosis risk (i.e., prodromal) period may yield important clues for biomarker development, as well as for novel treatment targets. This study examined a task‐based and resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging in individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis (n = 22) and healthy control unaffected peers (n = 20). The self‐reference task comprised three task conditions where subjects were asked if an adjective was relevant to themselves (self), a designated other individual (other), or to evaluate the word's spelling (letter). Connectivity analyses examined medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), regions commonly found in conjunction analyses of self‐reference, during both the self‐reference task and rest. In task connectivity analyses, CHR individuals exhibited decreased mPFC–PCC connectivity when compared to controls. In resting‐state analyses, CHR participants showed greater mPFC–PCC connectivity. Taken together, results suggest that psychosis‐like alterations in mPFC–PCC connectivity is present prior to psychosis onset across both task and rest.     

Prevalence of violence risk factors in people at ultra-high risk of developing psychosis: a service audit

Background: There is little data available on the prevalence of violence risk factors in people at ultra‐high risk of developing psychosis. Aim: The aim of this study was to provide an estimate of the cross‐sectional prevalence of violence risk factors in those attending a routine clinical service for people at ultra‐high risk of developing psychosis. Methods: The case notes of all 34 clients receiving treatment over a 4‐week period were reviewed and all clinicians were interviewed. Information was gathered regarding gender, current violent ideation, history of violence (including convictions), expressions of concern from others, problems with alcohol or substance misuse, jealousy, suspiciousness, irritability, anger and relevant subthreshold psychotic symptoms. Information on protective factors, including treatment engagement, was also gathered. Results: Thirty‐eight per cent (n = 13) had a history of violent behaviour, 79.4% (n = 27) were thought to be currently experiencing significant levels of suspiciousness and 47.1% (n = 16) were thought to have problems with anger. Twenty‐nine per cent (n = 10) had previous known convictions for violence. Two‐thirds (n = 8) of those where risk of violence was identified were described as being engaged with treatment. Conclusion: There was a high prevalence of violence risk factors in this small sample. Further research with larger samples and better methodology is urgently required to investigate risk of violence in this group and determine the contribution, if any, of subclinical psychotic symptoms.     

Prodromes and coping types in bipolar patients with nonpsychotic or psychotic mania

BackgroundBipolar disorder is a recurrent and cyclical illness frequently accompanied by psychotic symptoms. Detecting prodromes and enhancing coping skills for prodromal symptoms in bipolar patients are very important for relapse prevention. Psychotic features in bipolar patients are related to poor prognosis. We aimed to investigate the differences in prodromal symptoms and coping styles in psychotic and nonpsychotic bipolar patients.MethodsEighty-three euthymic bipolar patients with or without a history of manic psychosis were interviewed about their demographic, diagnostic, and clinical information and completed a 40-item checklist for prodromal symptoms. After the interview, they completed the Coping Inventory for Prodromes of Mania.ResultsThe differences between the psychotic patients and the nonpsychotic patients were found in the prodromal durations, and a few prodromal symptoms such as afraid of going crazy (P = .03), energetic-very active (P = .01), and hearing hallucination (P = .02). The psychotic patients showed a higher score of denial or blame than the nonpsychotic ones (1.92 ± 0.73 in nonpsychosis, 2.32 ± 0.84 in psychosis; P = .03). Logistic regression revealed that the duration of prodromes (P = .02) and hearing hallucination (P = .01) were related to the presence of psychotic features.ConclusionPsychotic patients had a tendency to use denial or blame coping strategy and to experience attenuated psychotic symptoms a little more during the prodromal period. Timely psychosocial approaches for detecting signs and enhancing coping strategies would improve the outcomes.     

Attenuated psychotic and basic symptom characteristics in adolescents with ultra-high risk criteria for psychosis,other non-psychotic psychiatric disorders and early-onset psychosis

While attenuated psychotic symptoms (APS) and basic symptoms (BS) are the main current predictors of psychosis in adults, studies in adolescents are scarce. Thus, we (1) described the prevalence and severity of positive, negative, disorganization, general, and basic symptoms in adolescent patients at ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR), with other non-psychotic psychiatric disorders (PC) and with early-onset psychosis (EOP); and (2) investigated BS criteria in relation to UHR criteria. Sixty-nine 12–18-year-old adolescents (15.3 ± 1.7 years, female = 58.0 %, UHR = 22, PC = 27, EOP = 20) were assessed with the structured interview for prodromal syndromes (SIPS) and the schizophrenia proneness instrument-child and youth version (SPI-CY). Despite similar current and past 12-month global functioning, both UHR and EOP had significantly higher SIPS total and subscale scores compared to PC, with moderate-large effect sizes. Expectedly, UHR had significantly lower SIPS positive symptom scores than EOP, but similar SIPS negative, disorganized, and general symptom scores. Compared to PC, both EOP and UHR had more severe basic thought and perception disturbances, and significantly more often met cognitive disturbances criteria (EOP = 50.0 %, UHR = 40.9 %, PC = 14.8 %). Compared to UHR, both EOP and PC significantly less often met cognitive-perceptive BS criteria (EOP = 35.0 %, UHR = 68.2 %, PC = 25.9 %). BS were significantly more prevalent in both EOP and UHR than PC, and UHR were similar to EOP in symptom domains. Given the uncertain outcome of adolescents at clinical high-risk of psychosis, future research is needed to determine whether the combined assessment of early subjective disturbances with observable APS can improve the accuracy of psychosis prediction.     

The relationship between childhood trauma history and the psychotic subtype of major depression

Gaudiano BA, Zimmerman M. The relationship between childhood trauma history and the psychotic subtype of major depression. Objective: Increasing evidence exists linking childhood trauma and primary psychotic disorders, but there is little research on patients with primary affective disorders with psychotic features. Method: The sample consisted of adult out‐patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) at clinic intake using a structured clinical interview. Patients with MDD with (n = 32) vs. without psychotic features (n = 591) were compared as to their rates of different types of childhood trauma. Results: Psychotic MDD patients were significantly more likely to report histories of physical (OR = 2.81) or sexual abuse (OR = 2.75) compared with non‐psychotic MDD patients. These relationships remained after controlling for baseline differences. Within the subsample with comorbid post‐traumatic stress disorder, patients with psychotic MDD were significantly more likely to report childhood physical abuse (OR = 3.20). Conclusion: Results support and extend previous research by demonstrating that the relationship between childhood trauma and psychosis is found across diagnostic groups.     

A self-reported instrument for prodromal symptoms of psychosis: testing the clinical validity of the PRIME Screen-Revised (PS-R) in a Japanese population

OBJECTIVE: Early intervention for psychosis requires an easy, useful assessment instrument to identify subjects with prodromal symptoms at an early stage. The aim of this study was to test the clinical validity of the PRIME Screen-Revised (PS-R), a 12-item self-reported instrument for prodromal symptoms of psychosis, by comparing the results for a non-clinical population with those for a clinical population. METHOD: The PS-R was administered to 1,024 subjects (496 students and 528 outpatients). Of the 528 patients, 115 were randomly recruited and tested using the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS) to determine the concordant validity of the PS-R. The predictive validity of the PS-R was measured by determining the transition rate to psychosis during a 6-month follow-up period. RESULTS: The specificity and sensitivity of the PS-R, using the SIPS as a gold standard, were 0.74 and 1.00. The concordant validity of the PS-R against the SIPS was 0.43. The predictive validity of the PS-R and the SIPS, defined as the transition rate to psychosis, were 0.11 and 0.25, respectively. None of the patients with negative PS-R results developed psychosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed that the PS-R was highly valid and that its usage is feasible in both general practice and clinical settings. This self-reported instrument represents a useful screening tool for alerting clinicians to subjects with psychotic prodromal symptoms.     

A descriptive study of 'non-cases' and referral rates to an early intervention for psychosis service

Aim: Despite there being approximately 200 early intervention services for psychosis worldwide, little is known about the referral rates to these services, the diagnoses and needs of individuals found not to have a first episode of psychosis (FEP). Firstly, we aimed to describe the diagnoses for individuals who were found not to have a FEP (non‐cases) following an assessment using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV (SCID). We then aimed to examine the referral rates of cases and non‐cases to an early intervention service. Methods: All individuals referred to the early intervention service underwent a clinical assessment using the SCID. Results: In a 4‐year period, there were 632 referrals to the early intervention service for psychosis, and of these, 53% (n = 338) were found to have a FEP, 5% (n = 34) were found to have an at‐risk mental state for psychosis and 41% (n = 260) were found to be ‘non‐cases’. This represents a ratio of 1.9:1 of referrals to cases, or approximately 2:1. Of the non‐cases, 27% (n = 62) satisfied criteria for a mood disorder, with major depressive disorder the commonest diagnosis. A further 18% (n = 42) of non‐cases satisfied criteria for an anxiety disorder and nearly half of these were diagnosed with social phobia. The ratio of referrals to cases was not consistent over time and rose from 1.3:1 in the first year to 2:1 in the fourth year. Conclusion: A large proportion of individuals referred to an early intervention for psychosis service were found not to have psychotic disorder, however they still have significant needs regarding their mental health.     

Early trauma and familial risk in the development of the extended psychosis phenotype in adolescence

Wigman JTW, van Winkel R, Ormel J, Verhulst FC, van Os J, Vollebergh WAM. Early trauma and familial risk in the development of the extended psychosis phenotype in adolescence. Objective: Both genetic and environmental factors are thought to play a role in the development of psychotic outcomes; however, their respective contributions over time, including possible developmental interactions, remain largely unknown. Method: The contribution of parental general and psychotic psychopathology as proxies of genetic risk to the development of subthreshold psychosis and its hypothesized interaction with childhood trauma were studied in a general population sample of 2230 adolescents, followed from age 10–16 years. Outcome measures were: i) level of psychotic experiences at age 16 years and ii) persistence of such experiences over the total follow‐up period. Results: General parental psychopathology was associated with CAPE score (OR = 1.08; P < 0.043 for highest quintile) and suggestively predicted psychosis persistence (OR, 1.16; P < 0.072). Psychotic parental psychopathology was suggestively associated with CAPE score (OR, 2.25; P < 0.063 for highest quintile), predicted membership of the Persistent group (OR, 3.72; P < 0.039) and suggestively predicted membership of the Decreasing group (OR 2.04; P < 0.051). Childhood trauma was associated with CAPE score and with all developmental trajectories of subclinical psychosis. No evidence was found for an interaction between trauma and parental psychopathology. Conclusion: The development and persistence of subthreshold psychotic symptoms may be conditional on non‐interacting proxy genetic and environmental influences.     

Validity of the Prodromal Risk Syndrome for First Psychosis: Findings From the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study

Treatment and prevention studies over the past decade have enrolled patients believed to be at risk for future psychosis. These patients were considered at risk for psychosis by virtue of meeting research criteria derived from retrospective accounts of the psychosis prodrome. This study evaluated the diagnostic validity of the prospective “prodromal risk syndrome” construct. Patients assessed by the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes as meeting criteria of prodromal syndromes (n = 377) from the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study were compared with normal comparison (NC, n = 196), help-seeking comparison (HSC, n = 198), familial high-risk (FHR, n = 40), and schizotypal personality disorder (SPD, n = 49) groups. Comparisons were made on variables from cross-sectional demographic, symptom, functional, comorbid diagnostic, and family history domains of assessment as well as on follow-up outcome. Prodromal risk syndrome patients as a group were robustly distinguished from NC subjects across all domains and distinguished from HSC subjects and from FHR subjects on most measures in many of these domains. Adolescent and young adult SPD patients, while distinct from prodromal patients on definitional grounds, were similar to prodromals on multiple measures, consistent with SPD in young patients possibly being an independent risk syndrome for psychosis. The strong evidence of diagnostic validity for the prodromal risk syndrome for first psychosis raises the question of its evaluation for inclusion in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition).     

Influence of cannabis use on incidence of psychosis in people at clinical high risk

Aims

Evidence for case–control studies suggests that cannabis use is a risk factor for the development of psychosis. However, there have been limited prospective studies and the direction of this association remains controversial. The primary aim of the present study was to examine the association between cannabis use and the incidence of psychotic disorders in people at clinical high risk of psychosis. Secondary aims were to assess associations between cannabis use and the persistence of psychotic symptoms, and with functional outcome.

Methods

Current and previous cannabis use were assessed in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis (n = 334) and healthy controls (n = 67), using a modified version of the Cannabis Experience Questionnaire. Participants were assessed at baseline and followed up for 2 years. Transition to psychosis and persistence of psychotic symptoms were assessed using the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States criteria. Level of functioning at follow up was assessed using the Global Assessment of Functioning disability scale.

Results

During follow up, 16.2% of the clinical high-risk sample developed psychosis. Of those who did not become psychotic, 51.4% had persistent symptoms and 48.6% were in remission. There was no significant association between any measure of cannabis use at baseline and either transition to psychosis, the persistence of symptoms, or functional outcome.

Conclusions

These findings contrast with epidemiological data that suggest that cannabis use increases the risk of psychotic disorder.