Holism in nursing and health promotion: distinct or related perspectives? – A literature review

Scand J Caring Sci; 2011; 25; 798–805
Holism in nursing and health promotion: distinct or related perspectives? – A literature review Background: The concept of holism is central in health promotion as well as in nursing. Holism or a holistic view on health was identified as one of the key principles of the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion and is linked to social ecology and the determinants of health. Aims: To explore how the term holism was defined and/or described in Nordic articles with a health‐promotion approach, and how holism aspects were related to nursing and health promotion, and to the other key principles of the Ottawa Charter. Methods: Abstracts were first identified by the search word ‘health promotion’ as a keyword. The search was limited to 1986–2008 and abstracts written in English by authors with a Nordic affiliation. Abstracts/articles for this study were subsequently selected from these abstracts using the search words ‘holism’ and ‘holistic’ and analysed by quantitative and manifest qualitative content analysis. Findings: The sample included 23 articles: one theoretical, two reviews and 20 empirical studies. Sixteen articles included a hospital setting or nursing perspective. A holistic perspective could be extracted from most articles. No larger but several minor differences were identified in the way holism aspects were related to nursing and health promotion respectively. Conclusion: There is a risk that the individual patient perspective of holism in nursing may result in less chance of reaching larger groups of patients with chronic diseases and mental health problems, not least the most vulnerable ones.     

Audit or research – what is the difference?

• ? Audit and research are activities which have some characteristics in common and others which are rather different.
• ? This paper presents working definitions of each process and then examines their attributes and interrelationships in some detail.
• ? Areas covered include their purposes, what types of process they are, their theoretical bases, the methods used in each, sampling, the use of findings, confidentiality and the time frame of each.
• ? If nurses are to use or undertake research and/or audit appropriately in their practice, it is important that the similarities and differences between the two are clear.

     

A specialist nurse: an identified professional role or a personal agenda?

Specialist nurses have existed for many years. Initially denoting a nurse with extensive clinical experience, implicit within nursing's professional agenda for attaining 'specialist' status since the 1960s has been the requirement to achieve a high degree of 'specialist' knowledge through post-basic education. Despite the professional agenda, much confusion surrounding definitions of specialist nurses prevails. In recent years this confusion has been compounded in the United Kingdom by the introduction of advanced nurse practitioners alongside existing clinical nurse specialists. This paper suggests that health care professionals' perceptions of a 'specialist' are subjective, grounded in their own experiences. Drawing on a study which examined relationships between paediatric oncology outreach nurse specialists and other health care professionals, two types of personal agenda from which perceived 'specialist' status evolves are described: (1) 'needs-driven agendas', and (2) 'peer-driven agendas'. When 'specialist' status is accorded to paediatric oncology outreach nurse specialists, 'specialist' knowledge is derived from: formal qualifications, hands-on technical skills, previous 'specialist' work experience, in-depth medical knowledge and/or insight into families' dynamics. The relative contribution each of these makes towards constructing a 'specialist' depends on the experiences of individual health care professionals and the varying work locations and professional backgrounds of paediatric oncology outreach nurse specialists.     

Wicked spell or magic bullet? A review of the clinical supervision literature 2001-2007

Clinical supervision has become an established part of nursing. Implemented in various different ways it has attracted attention from the research, educator and practice communities. The literature reported and analysed in this paper describes work that may benefit professional practice but there continue to be questions about application and method. Two new messages arise from the literature. The first underscores the responsibility of health care organisations to sustain and develop clinical supervision and the second points to the potential benefit that clinical supervision may have on patient outcomes.     

Good work – how is it recognised by the nurse?

Aim. The aim of this paper is to shed light on how nurses describe situations that reflect achievement and provide confirmation that they have done good work. Background. Nurses’ recognition of good work does not seem to have been the object of direct investigation, but is indirectly reflected in studies focusing on nurses’ perceptions on work environments and the multifaceted nature of nursing. However, acknowledging high‐quality performance in professional nurses can facilitate nurses in maintaining and strengthening the goals and values of the profession. This in turn can help nurses shoulder the multifaceted responsibilities they have to patients and next of kin. Design. This paper is part of the Professional Learning in a Changing Society project, Institute of Educational Research, University of Oslo, funded by the Research Council of Norway. The project involves four professional groups. This paper, however, focuses on a group of 10 nurses, nine of whom work in hospitals and one in an outpatient clinic. A qualitative approach was chosen to gain insight into how nurses, as well as the other professional groups in the project, engage in processes of knowledge production and quality assurance work. Methods. Data presented in this paper derive from semi‐structured in‐depth interviews conducted during spring 2005 and focuses on the recognition of good work. Results. The following themes were identified as essential in confirming that one did good work: securing fundamental needs of patients and next of kin; managing the flow of responsibilities; positive feedback. Conclusions. Good work seems to be related to specific situations and a sense of achievement by the respondents. Relevance to clinical practice. Recognition of good work is not only rewarding and enjoyable; it may also serve as a source of consciousness raising for professional and ethical guidelines in the work place.     

Cardiac natriuretic peptides – hope or hype?

In recent years, biomedical science has witnessed the emergence of peptide biochemicals as significant topics of research. Some of these peptides are of little potential clinical use, while others, of which cardiac natriuretic peptides are an example, appear to be promising. This particular group of peptides (i.e. ANP, BNP and CNP) shows promising diagnostic as well as therapeutic potential for various pathological conditions. In the case of acute myocardial infarction, these peptides have significant diagnostic and predictive properties, more so than other biochemicals such as adrenaline, renin and aldosterone. In addition, ANP is found to have significant benefits over the classical anti-anginal drug glyceryl trinitrate. However, as is the case with other peptides, applying these benefits clinically may not be easy because of the structure of the compounds, but various strategies are now being applied to solve this problem. These include the use of non-peptide receptor ligands, inhibitors of ANP metabolism, gene therapy and so on. The development of drugs in clinical practice, which exploits the natriuretic peptides system therefore seems to be promising, and this article reviews advances in our understanding of these compounds.     

Moral distress in nurse leaders—A scoping review of the literature

Nurse leaders face immense organizational pressures exacerbating their distress, which has not been prioritized as much as frontline nurses. This review synthesized the literature to examine theoretical models, measures, contributing factors, outcomes, and coping strategies related to moral distress in nurse leaders. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched, and 15 articles—2 quantitative and 13 qualitative studies were extracted. The scoping review identified one study using a theoretical model and two measures—the ethical dilemmas questionnaire and the Brazilian moral distress scale. Contributing factors of moral distress include internal and organizational constraints, increased workload, and lack of support impacting physical and emotional well-being and intention to quit. This review did not yield any intervention studies emphasizing the need for research to identify specific predictors of moral distress and examine their relationship to nurse leader retention, so organizations can explore targeted interventions to promote coping and mitigate distress.