Attitudes towards do-not-resuscitate decisions: differences among health professionals in a Portuguese hospital

OBJECTIVES: Implementation of an in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) program stresses the need to discuss do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders, as CPR may not be desirable in some terminally ill patients. Ethical, social, educational, and professional issues may influence these decisions. This study was designed to evaluate attitudes among four categories of healthcare professionals. DESIGN AND SETTING: Survey in a tertiary hospital in Portugal. METHODS: An anonymous self-completed questionnaire was distributed to 825 staff members, 527 of whom responded (20% physicians, 44% nurses, 20% health technicians, 16% healthcare domestic staff). Responses were compared between the various health professional groups. RESULTS: The level of medical/health training was positively related to the frequency of DNR decisions (physicians and nurses could foresee more circumstances warranting DNR decisions than technical/administrator or domestic staff) and negatively related to the willingness to include the patient's family in the DNR decision (physicians and nurses saw less need for the family's participation than technical/administrator or domestic staff). Significant differences were also found between professional groups regarding the physician's responsibility and the nurses' participation in DNR decisions. There was no difference between the professional groups regarding the need to note the DNR decision in clinical charts. CONCLUSION: Health professionals differ in their attitudes concerning DNR decisions. In particular, the level of medical/health training and/or degree of involvement with the patient's daily care may play an important role in DNR decisions.     

Nursing older dying patients: findings from an ethnographic study of death and dying in elderly care wards

Nursing older dying patients: findings from an ethnographic study of death and dying in elderly care wards Background and aim. The aim of the study was to explore the experiences of dying patients and nurses working in three elderly care wards focusing on the management of care for dying patients. The majority of patients who die in hospital are over the age of 65 and evidence suggests that three fifths are over the age of 75. Older patients pose tremendous problems and challenges to nurses and doctors regarding the provision of good terminal care, particularly in relation to developing effective communication. METHOD: An ethnographic research design was chosen. The research sample consisted of 74 patients, 29 nurses and 8 physicians. The principle data collection methods were participant observation and semi-structured interviews. All respondents were interviewed following a period of observation on each of the ward areas. The data obtained from participant observation were then used to structure the interview questions. The purpose of asking questions about meanings associated with observational material was to evaluate the extent to which convergence or divergence of the data was taking place. FINDINGS: The findings demonstrate that the care of older dying patients was defined by a lack of 'emotional engagement' with the patient and the institutionalized nondisclosure of information about death and dying. The study raises issues concerning the lack of effective communication about terminal diagnosis and the strategies used by nurses and doctors for disclosing information about death and dying. The findings suggest that although nurses provide individual care to dying patients, much of this was aimed at meeting patients' physical needs. Nurses reported psychosocial aspects including spiritual and emotional care to be important, although there was little evidence of them being orientated towards this in practice. CONCLUSION: The indicative conclusions from this study suggest that terminal care for some elderly patients remains hampered by a reluctance of nurses and doctors to be more open in their communication about death. It would appear that hospital culture and the mores, beliefs and ideologies that emanate from the biomedical model, significantly shape the experiences of older dying patients.     

Capturing the concealed: Interprofessional practice and older patients' participation in decision-making about discharge after acute hospitalization

The aim of this paper is to investigate ways in which the dynamics of interprofessional work shaped older patients' “participation” in decision-making about discharge from acute hospital care in a medical directorate of a District General Hospital in Scotland. Twenty-two purposively selected older patients and their key professional hospital carers in three different ward environments participated in the study. An ethnographic approach was adopted, involving semi-structured interviews with patients and staff combined with rigorous observation of the practical context for staff and patient interactions during the discharge planning process over a 5-month period. Patients' and staff's understanding of “decision-making” and their priorities for discharge were different, but patients' perspectives fragmented and became invisible. Care routines, which centred around assessments and the decisions that flowed from these tended to exclude both staff and patients from active decision-making. Research and practice on patient involvement in discharge decision-making needs to focus on the organizational context, which shapes patients', unpaid carers' and staff's interactions and the dynamics by which some views are privileged and others excluded. Procedurally driven care routines and their impact on patients', carers' and staff's opportunity to actively engage in decision-making should be re-considered from an empowerment perspective.     

Capturing the concealed: Interprofessional practice and older patients' participation in decision-making about discharge after acute hospitalization

The aim of this paper is to investigate ways in which the dynamics of interprofessional work shaped older patients' "participation" in decision-making about discharge from acute hospital care in a medical directorate of a District General Hospital in Scotland. Twenty-two purposively selected older patients and their key professional hospital carers in three different ward environments participated in the study. An ethnographic approach was adopted, involving semi-structured interviews with patients and staff combined with rigorous observation of the practical context for staff and patient interactions during the discharge planning process over a 5-month period. Patients' and staff's understanding of "decision-making" and their priorities for discharge were different, but patients' perspectives fragmented and became invisible. Care routines, which centred around assessments and the decisions that flowed from these tended to exclude both staff and patients from active decision-making. Research and practice on patient involvement in discharge decision-making needs to focus on the organizational context, which shapes patients', unpaid carers' and staff's interactions and the dynamics by which some views are privileged and others excluded. Procedurally driven care routines and their impact on patients', carers' and staff's opportunity to actively engage in decision-making should be re-considered from an empowerment perspective.     

Aggressiveness of nursing care for older patients and those with do-not-resuscitate orders

Age and do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders were experimentally manipulated with a 2 X 2 factorial design using four vignettes which were randomly assigned to 95 staff nurses from four sites in a mid-Atlantic metropolitan area. Attitudes toward aggressiveness of nursing care were measured using the same 13-item 6-point Likert scale with all vignettes. Two replications with 183 nursing students and 86 intensive care nurses from six sites followed. Both increased age and DNR orders significantly, p less than .05 and .01, reduced aggressiveness of nursing care attitudes in all three studies. However, attitudes toward care still remained in the moderately aggressive range, which is more aggressive than current patient classification systems describe for DNR patient care.     

Out-of-hours medical cover in community hospitals: implications for palliative care

BACKGROUND: The new General Medical Services contract in England means many GPs have transferred out-of hours work to their primary care organization, with implications for continuity of palliative care in community hospitals. AIM: To examine existing arrangements for out-of-hours medical cover in community hospitals, focusing on palliative care. METHODS: Telephone survey of community hospital managers/senior nurses across England and Wales. RESULTS: Interviews (n = 62) revealed nursing staff were satisfied with existing out-of-hours care. Concern was expressed about the future of out-of-hours medical care from GPs as new services will cover larger areas, meaning unknown doctors may attend, taking longer to arrive. CONCLUSION: Arrangements for out-of-hours medical cover in community hospitals are in transition, threatening the continuity of care for dying patients.     

The experience of being an older staff nurse

The nursing workforce is aging at an unprecedented rate, yet we know very little about the experiences of older staff nurses. A qualitative design with purposeful sampling was used to describe the experience of being an older staff nurse. Data were obtained through in-depth interviews with 11 staff nurses over the age of 55 who were employed at least part-time in six hospitals located in the southeastern United States. Data analysis was guided by a feminist perspective utilizing the voice-centered relational method developed by Brown and Gilligan. Study findings demonstrate that older nurses are working because they continue to care, despite the stressors of intergenerational conflict with younger nurses, less respect from patients and families, and inequity in pay. Older nurses are confident in their abilities and are capable of meeting the demands of hospital nursing.     

The compliance of doctors and nurses with do-not-resuscitate orders in Germany and Sweden

A questionnaire based on a case-scenario offering three levels of available information about the patients' wishes was circulated with the objective to evaluate compliance with do-not-resuscitate orders (DNR) and advance directives (AD) from a cross-cultural perspective. Replies from 191 doctors and 182 nurses from Germany and 104 doctors and 122 nurses from Sweden were studied. The frequency of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed against the patients wishes varied between 32.5% (German doctors for DNR-scenario) and 8.3% (Swedish nurses for AD-scenario). The variance regarding the CPR decision could be explained by the help obtained by increasing information regarding the patients wishes and preferred treatment options. Since compliance is related to detailed information given by the patient the use of DNRs and ADs should be encouraged to a larger extent.     

Staff awareness of a 'Do Not Attempt Resuscitation' policy in a District General Hospital

UK hospitals have been instructed to ensure that all staff understand the institution's resuscitation policy. Using a questionnaire, we determined the level of knowledge about the hospital's 'do not attempt resuscitation' (DNAR) policy amongst a range of staff. Six hundred and seventy-seven questionnaires were returned. 91.4% of responders did not know the correct overall percentage survival to hospital discharge following an in-hospital cardiac arrest. 19.3% of doctors, 10.6% of nurses, and 8.9% of health care support workers (HCSW) gave answers in the correct range (i.e., 15-25%). Most doctors (93.5%), nurses (93.5%), and HCSW (78.9%) correctly identified that cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) should be the default position, when a DNAR decision does not exist. The majority of doctors (78.5%), nurses (73.2%) and HCSW (65.8%) appreciated that the hospital policy allowed a senior trainee doctor (specialist registrar; SpR) to make the initial decision without consultation with more senior medical staff. Knowledge of who was ultimately responsible for the DNAR decision was also good, with 100% of doctors, 100% of midwives, 98.3% of nurses and 78.9% of HCSW responding correctly. Ten percent of doctors, 15% of nurses and 10.5% of HCSW believed that the next of kin could demand resuscitation or a DNAR status. There was inconsistency about what information staff felt should be included in DNAR documentation and what, if any, continuing care should be given to patients who are not for resuscitation. Our study demonstrates that there is room for improvement in the awareness of staff about the DNAR process. The local DNAR policy is being reviewed to ensure that its messages are clear and a specific DNAR educational programme has been commenced.     

The care of older people with dementia in acute hospitals

cowdell f. (2010) The care of older people with dementia in acute hospitals. International Journal of Older People Nursing 5 , 83–92. Aim. To explore the experiences of patients and nursing staff of the care received by older people with dementia in acute hospitals. Background. The prevalence of dementia is steadily increasing as is the number of people with the condition requiring acute hospital care. Significant concerns about the quality of this care have been raised. There is a paucity of knowledge about the views of such care from the perspectives of people with dementia and nurses. Method. An ethnographic approach was used and data were collected thorough observation and interviews in one acute hospital in the United Kingdom. Findings. Findings suggest that care for older people with dementia in acute hospitals is not always optimum although there are clear exceptions. Generally, people with dementia found the delivery of care and the experience of being in hospital distressing as they did not know what was happening and they were often ignored. Nurses strive to give good care but do not always achieve this. Conclusion. Bourdieu’s Model of Practice assists in explaining why care is as it is. There is a clear need to improve current practice. Relevance to clinical practice. It is imperative that innovative methods of developing practice are implemented and evaluated. Education alone will not lead to sustained changes in practice. Further research into this subject needs to be undertaken.     

Ethics review: Perioperative do-not-resuscitate orders – doing 'nothing' when 'something' can be done

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has the ability to reverse premature death. It can also prolong terminal illness, increase discomfort and consume enormous resources. Despite the desire to respect patient autonomy, there are many reasons why withholding CPR may be complicated in the perioperative setting. This review outlines these factors in order to offer practical suggestions and to provoke discussion among perioperative care providers. Although originally described for witnessed intraoperative arrests, closed chest cardiac massage quickly became universal practice, and a legal imperative in many hospitals. Concerns were raised by both health care workers and patient groups; this eventually led to the creation of the do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order. However, legal precedents and ethical interpretations dictated that patients were expected to receive full resuscitation unless there was explicit documentation to the contrary. In short, CPR became the only medical intervention that required an order to prevent it from being performed. Before the 1990s, patients routinely had pre-existing DNR orders suspended during the perioperative period. Several articles criticized this widespread practice, and the policy of 'required reconsideration' was proposed. Despite this, many practical issues have hindered widespread observance of DNR orders for surgical patients, including concerns related to the DNR order itself and difficulties related to the nature of the operating room environment. This review outlines the origins of the DNR order, and how it currently affects the patient presenting for surgery with a pre-existing DNR order. There are many obstacles yet to overcome, but several practical strategies exist to aid health care workers and patients alike.     

医护人员实施乳腺癌患者决策辅助障碍及促进因素的质性研究

目的 了解医护人员在实施以乳腺癌患者为中心决策辅助过程中的促进因素与障碍因素,为进一步临床大范围实施决策辅助提供参考。方法 采用目的抽样的方法,选取2020年5月—11月在天津市某三级甲等医院乳腺肿瘤科工作的13名护士及7名医生进行半结构式访谈,运用内容分析法对资料进行整理分析,进行主题描述。结果 提炼出医护人员实施辅助决策的促进因素及障碍因素,促进因素主题的3个亚主题包括意识到决策辅助的重要性、患者的决策辅助需求、患者与医护人员的信任,障碍因素主题的5个亚主题包括环境限制、医护人员信心不足、信息不对称、患者决策参与不足、决策辅助体系不完善。结论 医护人员在实施乳腺癌患者决策辅助过程中存在着一定的障碍及促进因素,应正视医生、护士、乳腺癌患者参与决策的重要性,完善决策辅助工具及工作流程,构建符合我国国情的决策辅助模式。     

Perioperative do-not-resuscitate orders--doing 'nothing' when 'something' can be done

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has the ability to reverse premature death. It can also prolong terminal illness, increase discomfort and consume enormous resources. Despite the desire to respect patient autonomy, there are many reasons why withholding CPR may be complicated in the perioperative setting. This review outlines these factors in order to offer practical suggestions and to provoke discussion among perioperative care providers. Although originally described for witnessed intraoperative arrests, closed chest cardiac massage quickly became universal practice, and a legal imperative in many hospitals. Concerns were raised by both health care workers and patient groups; this eventually led to the creation of the do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order. However, legal precedents and ethical interpretations dictated that patients were expected to receive full resuscitation unless there was explicit documentation to the contrary. In short, CPR became the only medical intervention that required an order to prevent it from being performed. Before the 1990s, patients routinely had pre-existing DNR orders suspended during the perioperative period. Several articles criticized this widespread practice, and the policy of 'required reconsideration' was proposed. Despite this, many practical issues have hindered widespread observance of DNR orders for surgical patients, including concerns related to the DNR order itself and difficulties related to the nature of the operating room environment. This review outlines the origins of the DNR order, and how it currently affects the patient presenting for surgery with a pre-existing DNR order. There are many obstacles yet to overcome, but several practical strategies exist to aid health care workers and patients alike.     

Ethics review: Perioperative do-not-resuscitate orders – doing 'nothing' when 'something' can be done

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has the ability to reverse premature death. It can also prolong terminal illness, increase discomfort and consume enormous resources. Despite the desire to respect patient autonomy, there are many reasons why withholding CPR may be complicated in the perioperative setting. This review outlines these factors in order to offer practical suggestions and to provoke discussion among perioperative care providers. Although originally described for witnessed intraoperative arrests, closed chest cardiac massage quickly became universal practice, and a legal imperative in many hospitals. Concerns were raised by both health care workers and patient groups; this eventually led to the creation of the do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order. However, legal precedents and ethical interpretations dictated that patients were expected to receive full resuscitation unless there was explicit documentation to the contrary. In short, CPR became the only medical intervention that required an order to prevent it from being performed. Before the 1990s, patients routinely had pre-existing DNR orders suspended during the perioperative period. Several articles criticized this widespread practice, and the policy of 'required reconsideration' was proposed. Despite this, many practical issues have hindered widespread observance of DNR orders for surgical patients, including concerns related to the DNR order itself and difficulties related to the nature of the operating room environment. This review outlines the origins of the DNR order, and how it currently affects the patient presenting for surgery with a pre-existing DNR order. There are many obstacles yet to overcome, but several practical strategies exist to aid health care workers and patients alike.     

Factors associated with the time nurses spend at the bedsides of seriously ill patients with poor prognoses

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the time health professionals spend with inpatients that are close to the end of life. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We asked day-shift nurses to use a standardized log sheet to record how much time they spent in various categories of activity for 146 seriously ill medical inpatients with poor prognoses at 2 teaching hospitals. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 68, and the mean APACHE-III physiology score 28; 59% were white, 56% were women, 41% had cancer or HIV, and 81% had do not resuscitate (DNR) orders. The mean amount of time nurses spent with patients per 12-hour day shift was 53 min. In bivariate analyses, sex, religion, diagnosis and insurance status were not associated with nursing bedside time. In an ANOVA model, patients with DNR orders received more time than those without DNR orders (56 vs. 39 min, P = 0.04), and white patients received more bedside time than nonwhites (57 vs. 46 min, P = 0.01), even after controlling for severity of illness and DNR status. Among the 47 mentally alert patients who could be interviewed, symptom severity, quality of care, and satisfaction ratings were not associated with nursing bedside time. CONCLUSIONS: In this population, nurses spent less time with nonwhite patients and more time with patients with DNR orders. That patients with DNR orders received more time may be reassuring. However, further investigation will be required to confirm these results, to understand why nonwhite patients appear to have received less bedside nursing time, and to investigate further the relationship between time, satisfaction, and quality of care.     

Attitudinal patterns determining decision-making in the treatment of the elderly: a comparison between physicians and nurses in Germany and Sweden

OBJECTIVE: Do-not-resuscitate orders (DNR orders) and advance directives (AD) have been developed and their use by patients is increasing. The objective of the study was to evaluate the compliance with patient's wishes and doctors' and nurses' agreement on decision-making in the treatment of elderly patients from a cross-cultural perspective. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and four Swedish physicians and 122 nurses as well as 192 German physicians and 182 nurses from teaching and university hospitals were surveyed by a questionnaire based on a case-vignette with three scenarios of available information about patient's wishes for treatment. RESULTS: A relationship between the perceived level of help and the chosen treatment option was established for all four samples, especially for the scenario in which an AD was available. Two patterns of closely related determinants appeared: (a) 'patient's wishes', 'ethical concerns', and 'family wishes'; and (b) 'patient's age', 'level of dementia', and 'hospital costs'. CONCLUSIONS: An intensive and continuous education of physicians and nurses in medical ethics is required to promote patient autonomy in clinical practice. The ethical implications of patient's age and level of dementia in relation to hospital costs should constitute important topics of these educational programs.     

Portuguese nurses' knowledge of and attitudes toward hospitalized older adults

Portugal is impacted by the rapid growth of the aging population, which has significant implications for its health care system. However, nurses have received little education focusing on the unique and complex care needs of older adults. This gap in the nurses′ education has an enormous impact in their knowledge and attitudes and affects the quality of nursing care provided to older adults. A cross‐sectional study was conducted among 1068 Portuguese nurses in five hospitals (northern and central region) with the following purposes: (i) explore the knowledge and attitudes of nurses about four common geriatric syndromes (pressure ulcer, incontinence, restraint use and sleep disturbance) in Portuguese hospitals; and (ii) evaluate the influence of demographic, professional and nurses' perception about hospital educational support, geriatric knowledge, and burden of caring for older adults upon geriatric nursing knowledge and attitudes. The mean knowledge and attitudes scores were 0.41 ± 0.15 and 0.40 ± 0.21, respectively (the maximum score was 1). Knowledge of nurses in Portuguese hospitals about the four geriatric syndromes (pressure ulcers, sleep disturbance, urinary incontinence and restraint use) was found inadequate. The nurses' attitudes towards caring for hospitalized older adults were generally negative. Nurses who work in academic hospitals demonstrated significantly more knowledge than nurses in hospital centers. The attitudes of nurses were significantly associated with the hospital and unit type, region, hospital educational support, staff knowledge, and perceived burden of caring for older adults. The study findings support the need for improving nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards hospitalized older adults and implementing evidence‐based guidelines in their practice.