MR arthrographic appearance of the postoperative acetabular labrum in patients with suspected recurrent labral tears

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the MR arthrographic appearance of the acetabular labrum in patients with a suspected recurrent acetabular labral tear after previous arthroscopic resection of a labral tear. CONCLUSION: The labrum after excision will appear shortened on MR arthrography. A recurrent labral tear can be diagnosed by the identification on MR arthrography of a new line to the labral surface, an enlarged and distorted labrum, or a new paralabral cyst.     

Evaluation of radial-sequence imaging in detecting acetabular labral tears at hip MR arthrography

Objective In recent years, radial imaging has been advocated for improved visualization of the acetabular labrum in magnetic resonance arthrography of the hip. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether radial imaging demonstrates labral tears not visible on standard imaging planes. Methods Fifty-four consecutive magnetic resonance (MR) arthrograms of the hip that included radial imaging over 2 years were retrospectively analyzed by two radiologists. Standard imaging planes and radial imaging were reviewed for identification of labral tears in four specific areas of the labrum: anterosuperior, posterosuperior, anteroinferior, and posteroinferior. The standard imaging sequences include fat-saturated spin-echo T1-weighted images in the coronal and oblique axial planes, non-fat-saturated T1-weighted images in the coronal and sagittal planes, and T2-weighted sequence in the axial plane. Radial imaging was performed as previously described using fat-saturated T1-weighted sequences. Results Using standard imaging planes, 50 anterosuperior, 31 posterosuperior, 10 anteroinferior, and 9 posteroinferior labral tears were detected in 54 MR arthrograms of the hip. Using radial sequences alone, 44 anterosuperior, 25 posterosuperior, 9 anteroinferior, and 5 posteroinferior labral tears were detected. In all four areas of the labrum, the radial imaging did not show any labral tear not seen on standard imaging planes. Discussion In MR arthrography of the hip, radial imaging did not reveal any additional labral tears. Standard imaging planes sufficiently demonstrate all acetabular labral tears.     

3.0T常规MRI与MR髋关节造影诊断髋臼唇撕裂的对比研究

目的 在3.0 T场强中,比较常规髋关节MRI及MR髋关节造影对髋臼唇撕裂的诊断价值.方法 回顾分析44例髋关节病变患者的患侧髋关节常规MRI及MR髋关节造影资料,将每例患者的臼唇划分为前、上、后3处区域(共计132处),确定有无撕裂,并进行分型.其中5例患者经髋关节镜检查.对于常规MRI及MR髋关节造影获得的臼唇撕裂及分型数据差异比较采用Wilcoxon秩和检验,一致性比较采用Kappa检验.结果 常规MRI与MR髋关节造影诊断完全相同者计116处臼唇,只有16处存在诊断差异.其中,前者诊断无撕裂而后者诊断撕裂者9处,前者诊断撕裂但后者诊断无撕裂者6处,其余1处两者均诊断为撕裂但分型不同.常规MRI与MR髋关节造影的评价差异没有统计学意义(Z=0.347,P＞0.05),且具有极好的一致性(K=0.781,P＜0.01).在接受关节镜的5例患者中,常规MRI、MR髋关节造影及关节镜结果均完全吻合.结论 对髋臼唇撕裂,3.0 T常规髋关节MRI可获得与MR髋关节造影基本相同的诊断效果.     

MR arthrography of the hip joint

MR arthrography of the hip joint is usually performed after a conventional MRI has been obtained to rule out other pathologies of the hip joint as for instance bone marrow edema or osteonecrosis of the hip. MR arthrography is mainly performed as a very special investigation, and it is executed in most cases if the clinician asks for the diagnosis of a labral lesion. In very rare cases, MR arthrography of the hip is performed to image cartilage disease or osteochondrosis dissecans or free intraarticular bodies. In this paper, the indications, the technique, and the most important pathology of the hip joint--labral lesions--will be described as well as variants of the normal acetabular labrum. After a conventional MRI of the hip joint has been performed, a MR arthrography of the hip will be obtained to search for labral pathology or cartilage disease. MR arthrography is obtained after the intraarticular injection of 10-20 ml of a 0.1 mmol solution of gadopentate-dimeglumine has been performed. The intraarticular injection can either be fluoroscopic-guided or CT-guided or directly MR-guided. After the intraarticular injection, MR arthrography will be performed by the use of paracoronal and parasagittal T1-weighted spin echo or gradient echo sequences. In cases of labral lesions (degeneration, labral tear, labral detachment) or cartilage disease MR arthrography proved to be more sensitive as conventional MRI as shown in the literature. The sensitivity of MRI to detect labral pathology was reported to be about 65%, and that of MR arthrography was reported to be about 92-95% compared to surgical results. According to the current literature, MR arthrography is the most sensitive method to delineate these kind of pathologies. Therefore, the invasive technique of MR arthrography may be justified for the correct diagnosis of these kind of pathologies after other pathologic entities have been ruled out by conventional MRI.     

MR arthrography for evaluation of the acetabular labrum

MR arthrography of the hip has provided new insights into the lesions underlying mechanical hip pain. Until now evaluation of these structures, especially the acetabular labrum, has been limited. With the joint distention provided by MR arthrography, labral detachments and intrasubstance tears can be identified and differentiated from the many varied appearances of the asymptomatic labrum. This article reviews the normal anatomy of the hip, the clinical presentation of internal derangement and the technique for performing MR arthrography. The variations in morphology and signal of the asymptomatic labrum are reviewed as well as the appearance of the abnormal labrum. Received: 16 January 2001 Revision requested: 21 January 2001 Revision received: 19 April 2001 Accepted: 19 April 2001     

髋关节MR造影在髋臼唇撕裂诊断中的应用

目的 探讨髋关节MR造影在髋臼唇撕裂诊断中的应用价值.方法 临床高度怀疑髋臼唇撕裂的15例20个髋关节在透视下行髋关节穿刺造影,采用SE T1WI加脂肪抑制技术,进行髋关节冠状面、矢状面、斜轴面及放射状位扫描.其中12例行关节镜检查.结果 在行髋关节镜检查的12例14个髋关节中,11例13个髋关节MR造影诊断为髋臼唇撕裂,与关节镜诊断相符;1例MR造影示正常,关节镜检查亦未发现髋臼唇撕裂.13个髋臼唇撕裂中位于前上象限12个髋关节,后上象限1个髋关节.在关节镜诊断髋臼唇撕裂的13个髋关节中,MR造影冠状面诊断髋臼唇撕裂3个髋关节,矢状面诊断10个髋关节,斜轴面及放射状位诊断髋臼唇撕裂均为13个髋关节.15例20个髋关节中有5例6个髋关节在后下象限有髋臼唇下沟表现.结论 MR髋关节造影是诊断髋臼唇撕裂的可靠方法,扫描方法应选择T1WI加脂肪抑制的矢状面及斜轴面或矢状面加放射状位.后下象限撕裂的诊断中应注意正常变异的存在.

Abstract：

Objective To investigate the application value of MR rthrography (MRA) in the diagnosis of acetabular labral tears. Methods Fifteen patients with a high degree of suspected acetabular labral tears received fluoroscope-guided injection of the contrast media into the hip joint ( hip arthrography) and fat-saturated spin-echo T1-weighted images were obtained in the coronal, sagittal, oblique-axial and radial planes. Hip arthroscopy was performed on 12 of them. Results Labral tears which were diagnosed in 11 patients by hip MRA were confirmed at hip arthroscopy. One patient showed no MRA indication of labral tear, also showed normal on arthroscopy. Tear in the anterior-superior quadrant 10 cases of 12 joints ( 12/13), posterior-superior quadrant 1 case of a joint (1/13). In 11 patients who underwent arthroscopy, hip MRA diagnosed 3 (3/13) joints labral tears in coronal planes, 10 (10/13) joints in sagittal planes and 13 (13/13) labral tears in axial-oblique and radial planes. In 15 patients with 20 hip joints, 5 cases 6 joints (6/20) with normal acetabular sublabral sulcus were performed. Conclusions MR arthrography of hip is a reliable method in the diagnosis of acetabular labral tears. Scanning method should be included fat-saturated spin-echo T1-weighted images in sagittal and oblique-axial planes or sagittal plus radial planes. The diagnosis of tor posterior-inferior quadrant should pay attention to the existence of a normal variation.     

Acetabular labral tears: contrast-enhanced MR imaging under continuous leg traction

 Objective. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of continuous leg traction on contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the hip joint and to determine whether MR imaging under these conditions is useful for demonstrating acetabular labral tears. Design and patients. Nineteen hips underwent MR imaging with a T1-weighted spin-echo sequence, followed by MR imaging under continuous leg traction after intravenous injection of gadolinium-DTPA. Joint fluid enhancement and labral contour detection were evaluated. Eleven hips had labral tears shown by conventional arthrography, arthroscopy and macroscopic surgical findings. Assessment of labral tears by MR imaging was correlated with the diagnosis based on these standard techniques. Results and conclusions. Joint fluid enhancement was obtained in all hips at 30 min after injection. Superior and inferior labral surfaces were completely delineated in 1 hip on the unenhanced MR images, and in 7 and 13 hips, respectively, on the enhanced images under traction. The enhanced images under traction depicted 9 of the 11 labral tears. Comparison between the unenhanced image and the enhanced image under traction avoided mistaking undercutting of the labrum for a tear in 4 hips. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging under traction was valuable for detecting labral tears non-invasively and without radiation. Follow-up examinations using this method in patients with acetabular dysplasia can help to clarify the natural course of labral disorders and enable better treatment planning.     

MR arthrography of the hip: normal intra-articular structures and common disorders

This pictorial review illustrates the anatomical features of normal intra-articular components of the hip and their common disorders on MR arthrography. On T1-weighted MR arthrograms, the normal contrast-filled joint cavity shows a homogeneous high signal intensity. Normal acetabular labrum appears as a well-delineated triangle showing a low signal intensity, surrounded by contrast material in the perilabral recess. Intra-articular paramagnetic contrast outlines labral tears, loose bodies, communicating labral cysts and cartilage lesions (traumatic tears, focal defects, degenerative fissures and thinning), and improves their detection. Overall, MR arthrography enables accurate detection and staging of hip intra-articular structure abnormalities. Received: 6 June 1998; Revision received: 2 January 1999; Accepted: 2 April 1999     

Evaluation of the acetabular labrum at 3.0-T MR imaging compared with 1.5-T MR arthrography: preliminary experience

Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare imaging of the acetabular labrum with 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and 1.5-T MR arthrography. Eight patients (four male, four female; mean age, 38 years) with hip pain suspicious for labral disease were examined at both MR arthrography and MR imaging. Presence of labral lesions, paralabral cysts, articular cartilage lesions, subchondral cysts, osteophytes, and synovial herniation pits was recorded. There was arthroscopic correlation of findings in five patients. MR imaging depicted four surgically confirmed labral tears that were identified at MR arthrography, as well as one that was not visualized at MR arthrography. MR imaging helped identify all other pathologic conditions that were diagnosed at MR arthrography and helped identify one additional surgically confirmed focal articular cartilage lesion. These results provide encouraging support for evaluation with 3.0-T MR imaging over 1.5-T MR arthrography.     

MR Arthrography of the Hip

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hip has been valuable in the diagnosis of occult osseous abnormalities and of periarticular soft tissue disorders. MRI has been less useful in the evaluation of acetabular labral tears and other intra-articular abnormalities. Image optimization is more technically challenging in the hip than in smaller joints because the overlying soft tissues are thicker, resulting in decreased spatial and contrast resolutions that may not be adequate to distinguish the acetabular labrum from subchondral bone, articular cartilage, and joint capsule. MR arthrography (MRA) extends the capabilities of conventional MRI because contrast solution separates intra-articular structures and outlines abnormalities. In hips with suspected acetabular labral injury, arthrographic MR images demonstrate the location and length of tears and the presence of associated capsular defects. Arthrographic MR images may also enable the accurate diagnosis of cartilage lesions and intra-articular loose bodies. This article illustrates normal arthrographic MR features of the hip as well as pathologic disorders of the acetabular labrum, capsule, and articular cartilage     

MR imaging and MR arthrography of paraglenoid labral cysts

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the pathophysiology of paraglenoid labral cysts on the basis of MR imaging, MR arthrography, and cyst aspiration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2211 MR imaging examinations, 51 (2.3%) cysts in 46 patients were identified. MR arthrography (n = 5), cystography (n = 1), arthroscopy (n = 17), percutaneous needle aspiration (n = 4), and medical records were also reviewed (n = 46). RESULTS: On MR imaging and arthrography, cysts were best viewed on T2-weighted images. Mean cyst diameter and volume were 2.2 cm and 2.8 cm3, respectively. Fifty-seven percent of cysts were located adjacent to the posterior labrum. On MR imaging and arthroscopy, a labral tear was identified in 27 (53%) and 15 (88%) patients, respectively. Eight cysts that caused compression neuropathy were large (mean size, 3.1 cm; p = 0.04) and located next to the posterior or inferior labrum. In four of five patients, MR arthrograms showed no intraarticular contrast material in the cyst. Cystograms showed no communication with the glenohumeral joint space, and cyst aspiration resulted in temporary symptom relief; however, cysts recurred in three of four patients. CONCLUSION: Most paralabral cysts are associated with labral tears. Paralabral cysts may be difficult to identify on MR arthrography unless a T2-weighted sequence is performed. Direct communication between a cyst and joint space rarely occurs. A posterior or inferior cyst may cause compression neuropathy of the suprascapular or axillary nerve, respectively. Cyst aspiration may result in temporary relief of symptoms, but an untreated labral tear should be suspected if cysts recur.     

Sublabral sulcus at the posteroinferior acetabulum: a potential pitfall in MR arthrography diagnosis of acetabular labral tears

OBJECTIVE: Our study correlated findings on hip MRI and MR arthrography with hip arthroscopy to assess the location, prevalence, and potential pitfall of a normal acetabular sublabral sulcus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected 58 hip MRI studies along with surgical reports in 58 patients who underwent hip arthroscopy over a 5-year period. Intraoperative photography (n = 23), radiography (n = 56), unenhanced MRI (n = 13), and MR arthrography (n = 54) studies were available for review. Two radiologists described hip anatomy on radiology studies with agreement by consensus. RESULTS: A normal posteroinferior sublabral groove was confirmed on available arthroscopy photographs in four (17.4%) of 23 hips. In each of these four patients, the anatomic sublabral groove correlated with apparent partial labral detachment on MR arthrography. On review of all studies, 13 hips (22.4%) without a posterior labral tear at surgery had imaging findings of a sublabral sulcus. The sulcus was not associated with acetabular dysplasia, which was radiographically noted in 12 cases (21.4%). Preoperatively, the sulcus was misdiagnosed as a tear in two cases. Labral tears were anterior or anterosuperior in 51 patients. CONCLUSION: A posteroinferior sublabral groove is a relatively common normal anatomic hip variation. If not recognized as normal, the sulcus may serve as a diagnostic pitfall on MR arthrography. Its location is distinct from most labral tears. We did not discover a sublabral sulcus at the anterior or anterosuperior acetabulum, the most common sites of labral injury.     

3.0 T conventional hip MR and hip MR arthrography for the acetabular labral tears confirmed by arthroscopy

Objective

To evaluate the value of hip MR for diagnosing acetabular labrum tears, and to further compare the diagnostic performances of conventional MR with MR arthrography in acetabular labrum tears.

Methods

90 patients undergoing both hip MR examination and subsequent hip arthroscopy were retrospectively evaluated. Of these patients, 34 accepted both conventional MR and MR arthrography; while the other 56 only underwent conventional MR examination. All hip MR images were independently reviewed by two radiologists, and further compared with the results of hip arthroscopy.

Results

59 of 90 patients were confirmed with acetabular labral tears by hip arthroscopy and 31 without tears. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of conventional MR for evaluating the acetabular labral tears were 61.0%, 77.4%, 83.7% and 51.1% (radiologist A), and 66.1%, 74.2%, 82.9% and 53.4% (radiologist B), respectively, with good consistency between the two observers (K = 0.645). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of MR arthrography for assessing the acetabular labral tears were 90.5%, 84.6%, 90.5% and 84.6% (radiologist A), and 95.2%, 84.6%, 90.9% and 91.7% (radiologist B), respectively, with excellent good consistency between the two observers (K = 0.810). The sensitivity and NPV of MR arthrography for diagnosing the acetabular labral tears were significantly higher than those of conventional MR (both P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Hip MR arthrography is a reliable evaluation modality for diagnosing the acetabular labral tears, and its diagnostic performance is superior to that of conventional MR at 3.0 T.     

Sensitivity of MR arthrography in the evaluation of acetabular labral tears

OBJECTIVE: MRI has historically provided suboptimal visualization of tears of the acetabular labrum. Degenerative fraying and underlying cartilage abnormalities can often mimic tears of the labrum on conventional MRI. Administration of intraarticular gadolinium enhances the MRI appearance of the labrum to improve detection of labral abnormalities. This study examined the improved diagnostic sensitivity of MR arthrography compared with conventional MRI and the importance of confining the study to a small field of view. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one hips were imaged in 48 patients. Fourteen hips underwent conventional MRI with a large field of view (30-38 cm). Seven hips underwent conventional MRI with a small field of view (14-20 cm). Thirty hips underwent MR arthrography with a small field of view (14-20 cm). Labral tears were diagnosed when contrast material was identified within the labrum or between the labrum and the acetabulum, when a displaced fragment was noted, or when a paralabral cyst was identified. All study results were compared with findings at the time of hip arthroscopy. RESULTS: Conventional MRI with a large field of view was 8% sensitive in detecting labral tears compared with findings at the time of arthroscopy. Diagnostic sensitivity was improved to 25% with a small field of view. MR arthrography with a small field of view was 92% sensitive in detecting labral tears. CONCLUSION: A combination of MR arthrography and a small field of view is more sensitive in detecting labral abnormalities than is conventional MRI with either a large or a small field of view.     

Obturator externus bursa: prevalence of communication with the hip joint and associated intra-articular findings in 200 consecutive hip MR arthrograms

The purpose of the study was to demonstrate the prevalence of communication between the hip joint and the obturator externus bursa on hip MR arthrography. Following institutional review board approval, 200 hip MR arthrograms in 196 subjects were independently reviewed by two musculoskeletal radiologists. Discrepancies were resolved by adjudication. The presence or absence of communication between the hip joint and the obturator externus bursa was recorded. Associated lesions involving the acetabular labrum and articular cartilage were recorded. The obturator externus bursa was shown to communicate with the hip joint in 11 of the 200 (5.5%) hip MR arthrograms. Of these, six were in men and five were in women. The age range was 15–63 years with a mean age of 34 years. All 11 patients had labral tears. Eight of the 11 had cartilage lesions. The obturator externus bursa can be seen to communicate with the hip joint in 5.5% of hip MR arthrograms. Associated labral and cartilage lesions are common.     

Comparison of 3.0-T MR vs 3.0-T MR arthrography of the hip for detection of acetabular labral tears and chondral defects in the same patient population

Objective:

We report our experience in diagnostic sensitivity of 3.0-T conventional MR vs 3.0-T MR arthrography of the hip for detection of acetabular labral tears and chondral defects in the same patient population.

Methods:

43 consecutive patients had both conventional hip MR and MR arthrography examinations performed. These examinations were reviewed retrospectively by independent reading of two musculoskeletal radiologists who read the MR and MR arthrogram examinations in a randomized fashion (i.e. MR and MR arthrogram examinations were read at separate sittings and in a randomized fashion so as not to bias reviewers). Scans were assessed for acetabular labral tears and chondral defects. All patients went on to arthroscopy.

Results:

Of these 43 patients, 40 had acetabular labral tears read by Reader 1 and 39 had acetabular labral tears read by Reader 2 on MR arthrogram, 39 had acetabular labral tears read by Reader 1 and 38 had acetabular labral tears read by Reader 2 on conventional MR examination. There were 42 labral tears in 43 patients at arthroscopy. There were four false-negative labral tears compared with arthroscopy on MR and three false negatives on MR arthrography for Reader 1 and five false negatives on MR and four false negatives on MR arthrography for Reader 2. Each reader had one false-positive labral tear compared with arthroscopy on both MR and MR arthrography. There were 32 acetabular chondral defects at arthroscopy. Reader 1 saw 21 acetabular chondral defects on conventional MR and 27 chondral defects at MR arthrography. Reader 2 saw 19 acetabular chondral defects at conventional MR and 25 acetabular chondral defects on MR arthrography. There were no false-positive readings of chondral defects compared with arthroscopy on MR and one false positive for Reader 1 and two false positives for Reader 2 on MR arthrography as compared with arthroscopy. On conventional MR examination, sensitivities and specificities as compared with arthroscopy were as follows: Reader 1 acetabular labral tear (90% sensitivity, 0% specificity) and Reader 2 acetabular labral tear (88% sensitivity, 0% sensitivity). On MR arthrogram, sensitivities and specificities as compared with arthroscopy for Reader 1 were 93%, 0% and for Reader 2 were 90%, 0%, respectively. Sensitivities and specificities for detection of acetabular chondral defects as compared with arthroscopy were Reader 1 conventional MR (65% sensitivity, 100% specificity), Reader 1 MR arthrography (81% sensitivity, 91% specificity), Reader 2 conventional MR (59% sensitivity, 100% specificity) and Reader 2 MR arthrography (71% sensitivity, 82% specificity).

Conclusion:

In this series, 3.0-T MR demonstrated sensitivity for detection of acetabular labral tears that rivals the sensitivity of 3.0-T MR arthrography of the hip. In this series, 3.0-T MR arthrography was more sensitive than conventional 3.0-T MR for detection of acetabular chondral defects.

Advances in knowledge:

3.0-T MR and MR arthrography are near equivalent in the diagnosis of acetabular labral tears. This information is useful for pre-operative planning.MR arthrography has been reported to be more sensitive and specific for detection of acetabular labral tears in the hip than conventional MRI.^1–10 MR arthrography has also been reported to be superior in detection of acetabular cartilage defects as compared with conventional MRI.¹¹ To our knowledge 3.0-T MR vs 3.0-T MR arthrography sensitivity for detection of acetabular labral tears and chondral defects has not been specifically assessed.To our knowledge, Petersilge et al¹ first reported the utility of hip MR arthrography in the diagnosis of acetabular labral tears. Toomayan et al² compared MR arthrography of the hip with conventional MRI of the hip in different patient populations. He found MR arthrography with a small field of view to be substantially more sensitive for detection of acetabular labral tears than conventional MRI. Sutter et al¹¹ found 1.5 T MR arthrography to be superior to conventional MRI for detecting labral tears and acetabular cartilage defects.Patients with acetabular labral tears present with symptoms of persistent pain, clicking, locking and decreased range of motion. With the availability of hip arthroscopy, labral tears can more easily be addressed with minimally invasive surgery. Accurate pre-operative identification of labral tears is needed.² Based on previous studies demonstrating the accuracy of MR arthrography in detection of acetabular labral tears, surgeons often request MR arthrography of the hip to characterize labral tears prior to surgery.^1–10 The purpose of this study is to assess 3.0-T MR vs MR arthrography diagnostic performance in detection of acetabular labral tears and chondral defects in the same patient population using arthroscopy as a reference standard.     

Gradient-recalled echo sequences in direct shoulder MR arthrography for evaluating the labrum

Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of fat-suppressed gradient-recalled echo (GRE) compared with conventional spin echo T1-weighted (T1W) sequences in direct shoulder MR arthrography for evaluating labral tears. Materials and methods Three musculoskeletal radiologists retrospectively reviewed MR arthrograms performed over a 12-month period for which surgical correlation was available. Of 180 serial arthrograms, 31 patients had surgery with a mean of 48 days following imaging. Paired coronal oblique and axial T1W or GRE sequences were analyzed by consensus for labral tear (coronal oblique two-dimensional multi-echo data image combination, 2D MEDIC; and axial three-dimensional double-echo steady-state, 3D DESS; Siemens MAGNETOM Sonata 1.5-T MR system). Interpretations were correlated with operative reports. Results Of 31 shoulders, 25 had labral tears at surgery. The GRE sequences depicted labral tears in 22, while T1W images depicted tears in 16 (sensitivity 88% versus 64%; p < 0.05). Subdividing the labrum, GRE was significantly more sensitive for the posterior labrum (75% versus 25%; p < 0.05) with a trend toward greater sensitivity at the anterior labrum (78% versus 56%; p = 0.157) but not significantly different for the superior labrum (50% versus 57%; p > 0.7). Specificities were somewhat lower for GRE. Conclusion Thin section GRE sequences are more sensitive than T1W for the detection of anterior and posterior labral tears. As the specificity of GRE was lower, it should be considered as an adjunctive imaging sequence that may improve depiction of labral tears, particularly smaller tears, in routine MR arthrography protocols. Preliminary results of this study were presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society of Skeletal Radiology, Orlando, FL, USA, on 21 March 2007.     

Arthroscopic treatment of labratears

The acetabular labrum serves important physiological and biomechanical functions, allowing for normal hip function. Tears of the acetabular labrum occur in active, young patients. Common injuries attributed to labral tears include direct blows, falls, twisting injuries, and running. In many patients, however, the onset of symptoms is insidious, with atraumatic tearing caused by repetitive activities. These injuries, in most cases, may be diagnosed through careful history, physical examination, and magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography. A small subset of patients may respond to conservative treatment when initiated early. Arthroscopy of the hip is the gold standard both for diagnosing and treating labral tears. By using careful techniques and arthroscopic instrumentation adapted for the hip, arthroscopic treatment of labral tears may be performed with a very low rate of complications and successful treatment of symptoms in the majority of patients. However, long-term outcomes after partial labrectomy are not known.     

Hip Alpha Angle is Associated with Anterior-Superior Labral Tears but not Anterior Labral Tears

IntroductionThe purpose of this study is to examine the associations between hip and acetabular morphology, clinical and demographic patient factors, and acetabular labral tear location in young adults.Materials and methodsThis study was reviewed by the local Institutional Review Board. The hip magnetic resonance imaging arthrograms from 100 young adult patients (aged 18-35 years) who underwent hip arthroscopy within 1 month of the arthrogram were reviewed. Clinical and demographic variables including age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI) and quantitative hip measurements of acetabular anteversion, alpha and beta angles, femoral head extrusion index, lateral center edge angle, acetabular depth-width ratio, Sharp's and Tönnis’ angles were measured, and compared based on acetabular tear location.ResultsNinety-six (96%) of patients had arthroscopically confirmed acetabular tears, and 4 (4%) patients had a normal acetabula labrum. Most (85 [88.5%]) patients had tears involving the anterior-superior labrum and another location, 41 (42.7%) patients had tears involving the anterior labrum and another location, and 35 (36.5%) had tears involving the superior-lateral labrum and another location. Tears commonly occurred in more than one location, with 37 (38.5%) patients having tears in both the anterior and anterior-superior labrum; 28 (29.2%) patients with tears in both the anterior-superior and superior-lateral labrum and 11 (11.5%) patients with tears in the anterior and superior-lateral labrum. Patients with isolated tears of the anterior-superior labrum had on average higher alpha angles than patients with isolated tears of the anterior labrum (P = 0.007). In patients with anterior-superior labral tears, increased BMI (P = 0.033), and weight (P = 0.024) were associated with having concomitant tears of the superior-lateral labrum.DiscussionMR arthrograms are 96% sensitive for detecting acetabular labral tears. Acetabular labral tears tend to co-occur in different locations, with anterior and anterior-superior labral tears most commonly co-occurring. Patients with isolated anterior-superior labral tears had on average higher alpha angles than patients with isolated anterior labral tears.     

MR arthrographic findings of SLAP lesion type V

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the findings of MR arthrography of the shoulder and to assess the role of MR arthrography in the diagnosis of superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesion type V. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed fat-suppressed T1-weighted MR arthrography images of six patients who were diagnosed with SLAP lesion type V by arthroscopy. Each imaging plane, including the transverse, oblique coronal, oblique sagittal, and oblique transverse in abductor external rotation (ABER) position were evaluated for the following three findings: tear of the superior labrum at biceps tendon insertion, Bankart lesion, and continuity of the two former findings. RESULTS: Tear of the superior labrum was shown in all patients on oblique coronal images. Bankart lesion was noted in five patients on the transverse images and in four on the oblique sagittal images. On the oblique transverse images in ABER position, Bankart lesion was shown in all patients. The continuity of the two former findings was noted in three patients on the ABER positioned images. Therefore, three patients could be diagnosed as having SLAP lesion type V by MR arthrography in our series. CONCLUSION: It is difficult to detect all three findings of SLAP lesion type V in one imaging plane, however, a combination of multi-directional images may increase the feasibility of MR arthrography in diagnosing SLAP lesion type V.