Short-term Results of Laparoscopic Mini-Gastric Bypass

Background: The laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (MGB) is a modification of Mason's loop gastric bypass, but with a long lesser curvature tube. With weight loss results similar to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP), the MGB is a simpler operation with a low complication rate. Controversy exists concerning the efficacy and side-effects of this procedure. This report presents the technique of laparoscopic MGB and its results in 423 patients. Methods: From October 2001 to October 2004, 423 consecutive patients (87 males and 336 females) underwent laparoscopic MGB (LMGB) for morbid obesity. Mean age was 30.8 years, preoperative mean weight 120.3 kg and mean BMI 44.2 kg/m². Results: All procedures were completed laparoscopically. Mean operative time was 130.8 minutes, and mean hospital stay was 5.0 days. 18 minor early complications (4.3%) were encountered, and 7 major complications (1.7%) occurred. Marginal ulcers were noted in 34 patients (8.0%) during follow-up, and anemia was found in 41 patients (9.7%). Mean BMI decreased to 29.2 and 28.4 kg/m² at 1-year and 2-year follow-up, with mean excess weight loss 69.3% and 72.2%. The Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index improved significantly 1 year after the operation. Conclusions: LMGB has a low complication and mortality rate. The learning curve is less steep than for LRYGBP, whereas the efficacy is similar.     

One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass by Laparoscopy: Results of the First 209 Patients

Background: One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) by laparoscopy consists of constructing a divided 25-ml (estimated) gastric pouch between the esophago-gastric junction and the crow's foot level, parallel to the lesser curvature, which is anastomosed latero-laterally to a jejunal loop 200 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz. Methods: The results of our first 209 OAGB patients operated from July 2002 to June 2004 are reported. Mean age was 41 years (14-66), BMI 48 (39-86) and mean excess body weight 66 kg (35-220). In 144 patients, OAGB was the only operation performed, and in 61 patients it was accompanied by other surgery (18 cholecystectomies, 5 incisional hernia repairs, and 38 adhesiolysis), and in 4 patients a restrictive bariatric operation had been performed previously. Results: 2 patients (0.9%) were converted to open surgery due to uncontrollable bleeding. 3 patients (1.4%) needed re-operation in the immediate postoperative period. 5 patients (2.3%) needed prolonged hospital stay due to acute pancreatitis in 1 and anastomotic leakage in 4, all resolving with conservative treatment. 2 patients died (0.9%), 1 from fulminant pulmonary thromboembolism and 1 from nosocomial pneumonia. Long-term complications have occurred in only 2 patients who developed clinically significant iron-deficiency anemia. Mean excess weight loss was 75% after 1 year and >80% at 2 years. Conclusion: OAGB is a simple, safe and effective operation with less perioperative risk than conventional gastric bypass, quicker return to normal activities, and better quality of life.     

Laparoscopic Mini-Gastric Bypass for Failed Vertical Banded Gastroplasty

Background: Bariatric surgery is the only method for sustained weight loss in morbid obesity. However, 10-25% of patients will require re-operation for unsatisfactory weight loss or weight regain after restrictive surgery. Re-operation is associated with higher morbidity and mortality. This study is to evaluate the s a fety and efficacy of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGB) for failed vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG). Methods: From May 2001 to March 2003, 29 consecutive patients underwent LMGB for failed VBG. Average age was 39.7 years (range 22 to 56), and average BMI before re-operation was 41.7 kg/m² (range 35.0-70.8). 8 patients had previous open VBG, and 21 had laparoscopic VBG. The re-operation was for regain of weight in 16 patients, inadequate weight loss in 10 patients, and severe reflux esophagitis in 3 patients. Re-operation was performed after an average of 58.5 months (range 14 to 180). Results: All the re-operations were completed laparoscopically. Average operative time was 171.4 minutes (range 130 to 290). There was 1 mortality, due to leakage (3.4%). 1 re-operation was necessary, for incarceration of small bowel in a trocar wound 10 days after the LMGB (3.4%). 1 anastomotic site bleeding and 1 wound infection occurred. Average BMI 12 months after the LMGB was 32.1 kg/m² (range 26.4 to 42.7). The quality of life study was significantly improved. The revision operation had much more technical difficulty for those with previous open VBG than laparoscopic VBG. Conclusion: LMGB is an effective and safe revision operation for patients with failed VBG. A large series and long-term follow up is needed for confirmation.     

The Impact of Preoperative Weight Loss in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Background: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) is a widely performed bariatric operation. Preoperative factors that predict successful outcomes are currently being studied. The goal of this study was to determine if preoperative weight loss was associated with positive outcomes in patients undergoing LRYGBP. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients undergoing LRYGBP at our institution between July 2002 (when a policy of preoperative weight loss was instituted) and August 2003. Outcome measures evaluated at 1 year postoperatively included percent excess weight loss (EWL) and correction of co-morbidities. Statistical analysis was performed by multiple linear regression. P<0.05 was considered significant. Results: The study included 90 subjects. Initial BMI ranged from 35.4 to 63.1 (mean 48.1). Preoperative weight loss ranged from 0 to 23.8% (mean 7.25). At 12 months, postoperative EWL ranged from 40.4% to 110.9 % (mean 74.4%). Preoperative loss of 1% of initial weight correlated with an increase of 1.8% of postoperative EWL at 1 year. In addition, initial BMI correlated negatively with EWL, so that an increase of 1 unit of BMI correlated with a decrease of 1.34% of EWL. Finally, preoperative weight loss of >5% correlated significantly with shorter operative times by 36 minutes. Preoperative weight loss did not correlate with postoperative complications or correction of co-morbidities. Conclusions: Preoperative weight loss resulted in higher postoperative weight loss at 1 year and in shorter operative times with LRYGBP. No differences in correction of co-morbidities or complication rates were found with preoperative weight loss in this study. Preoperative weight loss should be encouraged in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.     

The Mini-Gastric Bypass: Experience with the First 1,274 Cases

Background: Results of the laparoscopic Mini-Gastric Bypass (MGB) are reported. Methods: 1,274 MGB patients are continuously monitored as part of an online computer tracking data-base system. Results: Mean preoperative weight (± Standard Deviation) was 132 ± 21 kg, BMI 47 ± 7. Mean excess weight loss was 51% at 6 months, 68% at 12 months and 77% at 2 years. The mean operating-time was 36.9 ± 33.5 minutes. The shortest time was 19 minutes. Hospital stay was 1.5 ± 1.6 days. The overall complication rate has been 5.2%.The overall rate of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism was 0.08% and 0.16% respectively. The leak rate was 1.6%. There was one hospital death, 0.08%. Associated medical illnesses were either completely reversed or markedly improved. Conclusions: The MGB is safe, results in major weight loss, has a short operating-time, and has a short hospital stay.The MGB appears to meet many of the criteria of an "ideal" weight loss operation.     

Psychosocial Outcome of Gastric Bypass Surgery for Patients With and Without Binge Eating

Background: There is limited data on the prevalence of eating disorder pathology in morbidly obese patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) and the degree to which this may affect surgical outcome. The present study examined surgical outcome between 2 groups of patients undergoing RYGBP: those with pre-surgical binge eating (BE) and those without pre-surgical binge eating (NBE). Methods: This study tested the hypothesis that the BE group would demonstrate greater pathology on measures of eating pathology, psychological wellbeing, and quality of life than the NBE group both pre- and post-surgery. Results: Compared with the NBE group, the BE group had significantly higher levels of disinhibited eating, and hunger, and significantly lower levels of social functioning at pre-surgery and 6 months post-surgery. The BE group had a significantly lower percentage of excess weight lost than the NBE group at 6 months post-surgery. Conclusions: These findings indicate a less successful outcome for the BE patients compared with the NBE patients. While there were more distinct differences between the BE and NBE groups before surgery, they were largely impossible to differentiate on psychosocial measures at post-surgery.     

Band Erosion after Laparoscopic Gastric Banding: Occurrence and Results after Conversion to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Background: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is a popular bariatric operation. Unfortunately, long-term complications such as slippage, infection, and intragastric migration (erosion) may occur. With erosion, band removal is mandatory. Options to prevent weight regain are delayed implantation of a new band, or conversion to another bariatric procedure such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) or biliopancreatic diversion. We present our experience with band erosion and immediate or delayed conversion to RYGBP. Methods: With a multidisciplinary team approach and prospective data collection, a comparison was made between patients with and without band erosion. The patients who were converted to RYGBP for band erosion were analyzed. Results: Gastric banding was performed on 347 patients between 1995 and 2002. Median follow-up is 52 months. Band erosion developed in 24 patients (6.8 %).The latter were heavier before gastric banding (BMI 45.9 vs 43.3, P <0,01). No band had ever been overinflated. Band erosion was diagnosed after a mean of 22.5 months (3-51). At time of diagnosis, mean BMI of 33.5 kg/m² (22.5-48) and average excess weight loss (EWL) of 52.9% (25-97) did not differ from that of the remaining patients at the respective time interval. The band was removed in all cases. Conversion to RYGBP was performed at the same time in 11, and a few months later in 2 patients. Operative morbidity included 1 leak (reoperation) and 4 wound infections. All but 1 patient lost further weight after reoperation, or at least maintained their weight. At last follow-up, mean EWL in relation to the pre-banding weight was 65.1%, and 69.2% of the patients had an EWL >50%, which compares favorably with the results obtained after primary RYGBP. Conclusions: In our series with a median follow-up >4 years, band erosion was more common than usually reported. Band removal with immediate or delayed conversion to RYGBP is feasible with an acceptable morbidity, and prevents weight regain in most cases. These results support further use of this approach for band erosion.     

Efficacy of Estradiol Topical Patch in the Treatment of Symptoms of Depression following Mini-Gastric Bypass in Women

Background: Obesity is associated with elevated levels of estrogen. Gastric bypass causes rapid weight loss and decreased levels of estrogen. Patients after gastric bypass can suffer from anxiety and depression out of proportion to the surgical outcome. This study reports the efficacy of a short-term empiric trial of topical estradiol for the treatment of mild to moderate depression and anxiety following mini-gastric bypass (MGB) in women. Methods: Postoperative MGB women were surveyed for the presence of depressive symptoms before and after MGB. The results of an empiric trial of transdermal patches of estradiol-17β were assessed. Outcome measures were the self-reported efficacy of the patch. Results: 711 women who had undergone MGB and had functioning e-mail addresses made up the study. 62% of patients reported depression prior to surgery. 156 patients (22%) reported depression after the operation. 130 women were treated empirically with the patch, and remission of depression was observed in 92 (71%). In response to the question "Did the estrogen patch help?", subjects reported responses of 1) Yes, fantastic, 2) Yes, somewhat, 3) Hard to say, 4) No, in 36%, 31%, 20%, 13% of respondents respectively. Patients treated with estradiol sustained antidepressant benefit of treatment after the patch was discontinued. Treatment lasted <1 month, 1-3 months, and >3 months, in 48%, 32% and 20% respectively. Treatment was well-tolerated and adverse events were rare. Conclusion: Depression is common in obese patients and remains a problem in a subset following the MGB operation. Transdermal estradiol replacement appears to be an effective treatment of symptoms of depression in women following MGB.     

A Prospective Study of Body Dissatisfaction and Concerns in Extremely Obese Gastric Bypass Patients: 6- and 12-Month Postoperative Outcomes

Background: Body image is a multifaceted construct commonly associated with obesity. This study examined changes in body dissatisfaction, and shape and weight concerns in bariatric surgery patients from baseline to 6 and 12 months post-surgery. Methods: 109 extremely obese patients who underwent gastric bypass surgery completed the Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ), and the Shape and Weight Concern subscales of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) at baseline, and 6 and 12 months post-surgery. Results: Patients experienced substantial weight loss and reported statistically significant reductions in BSQ, and Shape and Weight Concern scores from baseline to 6 and 12 months post-surgery. Improvements on the BSQ and Shape Concern scale were maintained between 6 and 12 months post-surgery, while patients reported continued reductions in weight and Weight Concern scale scores. Moreover, at 6 and 12 months follow-up, over 80% of female patients had body image scores comparable to published norms. Correlations between change in BMI and the body image measures were variable, and degree of weight loss did not predict body image scores 6 or 12 months post-surgery. Conclusions: Results from the present study illustrate significant and immediate post-surgical reductions in body dissatisfaction and concerns, along with weight loss in bariatric patients. Such improvements indicate a normalization of body image-related concerns in these patients, the majority of who remain overweight or obese despite the substantial post-surgical weight losses. Changes in weight and body image relate poorly to each other, suggesting that mediating factors may be involved.     

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with 2-metre Long Biliopancreatic Limb for Morbid Obesity: Technique and Experience with the First 150 Patients

Background: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is being performed widely as a treatment of choice for morbid obesity. We present our method and experience with the first 150 consecutive cases of laparoscopic RYGBP with a 2-m long biliopancreatic limb (BP-limb). Methods: Between November 2001 and November 2003, a prospective analysis of 150 patients was performed identifying technical success and complications. Before surgery, patients underwent a strict multidisciplinary behavioral program. At operation the stomach was transected proximally with a linear stapler (60-mm, Endo-GIA) to create a prolongation of the esophagus (gastric tube) along the lesser curvature, resulting in a 40-50 ml pouch. Two meters of the proximal jejunum were bypassed (BP-limb), creating an antecolic Roux-en-Y gastro-jejunostomy to the posterior wall of the gastric tube using a 45-mm linear Endo-GIA stapler. The entero-anastomosis was created 50 cm below the gastro-jejunostomy, also with a 45-mm linear Endo-GIA. Results: Mean BMI was 50.0, and 78% of patients were females. With 100% follow-up, we found an EWL of 50% 6 months after surgery, gradually rising to 80% after 18 months. The mean operating time was 116 min for the first 50 cases and decreased to 82 min for the last 50 cases. Intestinal leakage occurred in 5 patients (3%) and bleeding in 5 (3%). Most of these complications occurred in the first 50 cases, and all but one were treated successfully with an early laparoscopic re-operation. Marginal ulcers were found in 16.6% of patients. No internal hernias have occurred. Conclusion: The operation demands advanced laparoscopic skills, but technically it is relatively simple and has an acceptable complication rate. Short-term results regarding excess weight loss are at least comparable to the RYGBP with a long alimentary limb.     

Laparoscopic banding: selection and technique in 830 patients

Background: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) with the Lap-Band? has been our first choice operation for morbid obesity since September 1993. Results in terms of complications and weight loss are analyzed. Methods: 830 consecutive patients (F 77.9%) underwent LAGB. Initial body weight was 127.9 ± SD 23.9 kg, and body mass index (BMI) was 46.4 ± 7.2 kg/m². Mean age was 37.9 (15-65). Steps in LAGB were: 1) establishment of reference points for dissection (equator of the balloon inflated with 25 cc air and left crus); 2) creation of a retrogastric tunnel above the bursa omentalis; 3) creation of "virtual" pouch; 4) embedding the band. Results: Mortality was 0, conversion 2.7%, and follow-up 97%. Major complications requiring reoperation developed in 3.9% (36 patients). Early complications were 1 gastric perforation (requiring band removal) and 1 gastric slippage (requiring repositioning). Late complications included 17 stomach slippages (treated by band repositioning in 12 and band removal in 5), 9 malpositions (all treated by band repositioning), 4 gastric erosions by the band (all treated by band removal), 3 psychological intolerance (requiring band removal), and 1 HIV positive (band removed). A minor complication requiring reoperation in 91 patients (11%) was reservoir leakage. 20% of patients who had % excess weight loss <30 had lost compliance to dietetic, psychological and surgical advice. BMI declined significantly from the initial 46.4 ± 7.2 to 37.3 ± 6.8 at 1 year, 36.4 ± 6.9 at 2 years, 36.8 ± 7.0 at 3 years, and 36.4 ± 7.8 at 5 years. Conclusion: LAGB is a relatively safe and effective procedure.     

Predictors of Weight Status following Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass

Background: Weight loss after bariatric surgery varies and depends on many factors, such as time elapsed since surgery, baseline weight, and co-morbidities. Methods: We analyzed weight data from 494 patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) by one surgeon at an academic institution between June 1999 and December 2004. Linear regression was used to identify factors in predicting % excess weight loss (%EWL) at 1 year. Results: Mean patient age at time of surgery was 44 ± 9.6 (SD), and the majority were female (83.8%). The baseline prevalence of co-morbidities included 24% for diabetes, 42% for hypertension, and 15% for hypercholesterolemia. Baseline BMI was 51.5 ± 8.5 kg/m². Mean length of hospital stay was 3.8 ± 4.6 days. Mortality rate was 0.6%. Follow-up weight data were available for 90% of patients at 6 months after RYGBP, 90% at 1 year, and 51% at 2 years. Mean %EWL at 1 year was 65 ± 15.2%. The success rate (≥50 %EWL) at 1 year was 85%. Younger age and lower baseline weight predicted greater weight loss. Males lost more weight than females. Diabetes was associated with a lower %EWL. Depression did not significantly predict %EWL. Conclusion: The study demonstrated a 65 %EWL and 85% success rate at 1 year in our bariatric surgery program. Our finding that most pre-surgery co-morbidities and depression did not predict weight loss may have implications for pre-surgery screening.     

Postoperative management of laparoscopic gastric banding

Background:The authors investigated the postoperative management of morbidly obese patients treated by laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) with the Lap-Band^? System. Methods: The 3-year postoperative band management is presented in 379 morbidly obese patients, divided according to intra-operative band filling and quartiles of maximum postoperative band filling. Results: LAGB resulted in a 40.8±24.5 percent excess weight loss (%EWL). Stoma stenosis occurred in 87 patients (23.0%), pouch dilatation in 52 (13.7%) and esophageal dilatation in 22 (5.8%). Most bandrelated complications were controlled by simple band deflation. The mean number of postoperative band adjustments was 2.3±1.7, and mean maximum band filling after surgery was 2.8±1.2 ml. Weight loss at 3 years was identical in 205 patients who had the band completely unfilled at surgery and in 174 patients who had the band filled with 1 to 3 ml of sterile saline.The rate of band-related complications was significantly lower in the first group. No differences in %EWL were observed between quartiles of maximum band filling after surgery.The rate of band-related complications increased with increasing levels of postoperative maximum band filling. In patients with the band filled with <3.0 ml of sterile saline at 6 months, the inflation of further saline produced a dose-related increase in the rate of weight loss. In patients with the band filled with ≥ 3.0 ml of sterile saline at 6 months, the inflation of further saline was associated with a reduced %EWL. Conclusion: Postoperative adjustability of the LapBand^? was useful in the treatment of band-related complications and was able to significantly influence the rate of weight loss. On the other hand, aggressive postoperative band filling was associated with an increased rate of complications.     

Adjustable Gastric Banding in a Public University Hospital: Prospective Analysis of 400 Patients

Background: Laparoscopic application of an adjustable gastric band (LAGB) is considered the least invasive surgical option for morbid obesity. It has the advantage of being potentially reversible and can improve quality of life. Method: Between April 1997 and January 2001, 400 patients underwent LAGB. There were 352 women and 48 men with mean age 40.2 years (16-66). Preoperative mean body weight was 119 kg (85-195) and mean body mass index (BMI) was 43.8 kg/m² (35.1-65.8). Results: Mean operative time was 116 minutes (30-380), and mean hospital stay was 4.55 days (3-42). There was no death. There were 12 conversions (3%). 40 complications required an abdominal reoperation (10%), for perforation (n=2), gastric necrosis (n=1), slippage (n=31), incisional hernia (n=2) and reconnection of the tube (n=4). We noticed 7 pulmonary complications (2 ARDS, 5 atelectasis) and 30 minor problems related to the access port. At 2 years, mean BMI had fallen from 43.8 to 32.7 kg/m² and mean excess weight loss (EWL) was 52.7 % (12-94). Conclusion: LAGB is a very beneficial operation with an acceptable complication rate. EWL is 50% at 2 years if multidisciplinary follow-up remains assiduous. Surveillance for late anterior stomach slippage within the band is essential.     

Laparoscopic Latero-lateral Jejuno-jejunostomy as a Rescue Procedure after Complicated Mini-Gastric Bypass

Acute obstruction of jejunal limbs after gastric bypass surgery is rare but can result in a catastrophic scenario if the diagnosis is delayed. We report a 31-year-old female who developed acute efferent limb obstruction after a laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (MGB), manifested as recurrent episodes of epigastric discomfort and bile-stained vomiting. The diagnosis was evident on oral contrast studies. She was successfully treated by a salvage laparoscopic side-to-side anastomosis between the efferent limb and the afferent limb 4 cm distal to the gastro-jejunostomy. Acute obstruction of the efferent limb after a MGB operation can be easily diagnosed and effectively treated by laparoscopic latero-lateral jejuno-jejunostomy.     

Comparing the Outcomes after Laparoscopic versus Open Gastric Bypass: a Matched Paired Analysis

Background: Laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGBP) is being performed widely as a treatment of choice for morbid obesity. Advantages over open gastric bypass (OGBP) have not been well documented in controlled studies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the early postoperative outcomes after LGBP and OGBP using a matched paired analysis. Methods: 80 consecutive LGBP patients were matched by age, gender, preoperative BMI, and number of co-morbid medical conditions to 80 OGBP patients. Outcomes included length of stay (LOS), complications, percent excess weight lost (%EWL) and change in BMI over 1 year, time to return to normal activities, and quality of life (QOL). Continuous variables were analyzed using Wilcoxon Signed Ranks and discrete data were analyzed with McNemar tests. Results: Baseline variables were matched (LGBP/OGBP); age 43/42, mean preoperative BMI 44/46, co-morbid conditions 2.5/2.8. LOS was significantly shorter in the LGBP vs. OGBP group (3.6 vs. 4.3 days). There was a trend to more major complications (internal hernias requiring reoperation) in the LGBP group that did not reach significance. Minor complications were comparable. %EWL was significantly better in the LGBP group at 3, 6, and 9 months, but was comparable to the OGBP group at 1 year (LGBP/OGBP, 69%/65%). BMI at 1 year was also similar (29 vs. 31). LGBP patients returned to normal activities sooner and had equivalent QOL outcomes. Conclusion: LGBP provides certain advantages over OGBB. LOS and time to return to normal activities are shorter and early weight loss results may be superior.     

The Effects of Acute Preoperative Weight Loss on Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Background: Minimal acute pre-operative weight loss significantly reduces liver size and intra-abdominal adipose tissue. We hypothesize that these changes will reduce intra-operative complications and reduce the difficulty of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients who had undergone isolated LRYGBP between July 2003 and March 2005. All patients participated in our institution's medically supervised Weight Management Program before surgery. Results: 48 patients (Weight Loss Group) had an average percent loss of excess weight (%EWL) of 4.6; whereas 47 patients (No Weight Loss Group) gained an average of 4.8% of excess weight over an average period of 2.4 and 3 months (P=0.09), respectively. There were no differences between the two groups in age, gender, ASA class, co-morbidities, or BMI at operation. The Weight Loss Group had less intra-operative blood loss (102 vs 72 ml, P=.03). The surgeon was also less likely to report an enlarged liver in the Weight Loss Group (P=.02). Finally, the operation was less likely to deviate from the standard LRYGBP when patients lost weight (P=.02). No differences were seen in operative time, length of hospital stay, wound infections, or major complications. Conclusion: Acute preoperative weight loss is associated with less intra-operative blood loss and reduces the need for intraoperative deviation from the standard LRYGBP. A larger series with a greater reduction in excess weight is necessary to determine the maximal benefits of acute preoperative weight loss.     

A 10-year Experience with Laparoscopic Gastric Banding for Morbid Obesity: High Long-Term Complication and Failure Rates

Background: Since its introduction about 10 years ago, and because of its encouraging early results regarding weight loss and morbidity, laparoscopic gastric banding (LGB) has been considered by many as the treatment of choice for morbid obesity. Few long-term studies have been published. We present our results after up to 8 years (mean 74 months) of follow-up. Methods: Prospective data of patients who had LGB have been collected since 1995, with exclusion of the first 30 patients (learning curve). Major late complications are defined as those requiring band removal (major reoperation), with or without conversion to another procedure. Failure is defined as an excess weight loss (EWL) of <25%, or major reoperation. Results: Between June 1997 and June 2003, LGB was performed in 317 patients, 43 men and 274 women. Mean age was 38 years (19-69), mean weight was 119 kg (79-179), and mean BMI was 43.5 kg/m² (34-78). 97.8% of the patients were available for follow-up after 3 years, 88.2% after 5 years, and 81.5% after 7 years. Overall, 105 (33.1%) of the patients developed late complications, including band erosion in 9.5%, pouch dilatation/slippage in 6.3%, and catheter- or port-related problems in 7.6%. Major reoperation was required in 21.7% of the patients. The mean EWL at 5 years was 58.5% in patients with the band still in place. The failure rate increased from 13.2% after 18 months to 23.8% at 3, 31.5% at 5, and 36.9% at 7 years. Conclusions: LGB appeared promising during the first few years after its introduction, but results worsen over time, despite improvements in the operative technique and material. Only about 60% of the patients without major complication maintain an acceptable EWL in the long term. Each year adds 3-4% to the major complication rate, which contributes to the total failure rate. With a nearly 40% 5-year failure rate, and a 43% 7-year success rate (EWL >50%), LGB should no longer be considered as the procedure of choice for obesity. Until reliable selection criteria for patients at low risk for long-term complications are developed, other longer lasting procedures should be used.     

Reoperative Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: An Experience with 49 Cases

Background: Long-term complications leading to reoperation after primary bariatric surgery are not uncommon. Reoperations are particularly challenging because of tissue scarring and adhesions related to the first operation. Reoperations must address the complication(s) related to the scarring and, at the same time, prevent weight regain that would inevitably occur after simple reversal. Conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) has repeatedly been demonstrated to be the procedure of choice in most situations. It has traditionally been performed through an open approach. Our aim is to describe our experience with the laparoscopic approach in reoperations to RYGBP over the past 5 years. Methods: All patients undergoing laparoscopic RYGBP as a reoperation were included in this study. Patients with multiple previous operations or patients with band erosion after gastric banding were submitted to laparotomy. Data were collected prospectively. Results: Between June 1999 and August 2004, 49 patients (44 women, 5 men) underwent laparoscopic reoperative RYGBP. The first operation was gastric banding in 32 and vertical banded gastroplasty in 15. The mean duration of the reoperation was 195 minutes. No conversion to open was necessary. Overall morbidity was 20%, with major complications in 2 patients (4%). Weight loss, or weight maintenance, was satisfactory, with a BMI <35 kg/m² up to 4 years in close to 75% of the patients. Conclusions: Laparoscopic RYGBP can be safely performed as a reoperation in selected patients provided that the surgical expertise is available. These procedures are clearly more difficult than primary operations, as reflected by the long operative time. Overall morbidity and mortality, however, are not different. Long-term results regarding weight loss or weight maintenance are highly satisfactory, and comparable to those obtained after laparoscopic RYGBP as a primary operation.     

Routine Abdominal Drains After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Retrospective Review of 593 Patients

Background: The authors reviewed the benefits of routine placement of closed drains in the peritoneal cavity following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP). The purpose of the study was to determine whether routine closed abdominal drainage provides diagnostic and therapeutic advantages in the presence of complications such as bleeding and leaks. Materials and Methods: The medical records of 593 consecutive patients who had undergone LRYGBP from July 2001 through May 2003 were retrospectively reviewed. In all cases, antecolic antegastric LRYGBP was performed. Two 19-Fr Blake closed suction drains were left in place, one at the gastrojejunostomy and the other at the jejunojejunostomy. The incidence of bleeding and leaks was reviewed, and the utility of the drains relative to diagnosis and management was evaluated. Results: Bleeding presented in 24 patients (4.4%); in 8, the diagnosis was based on increased sanguinous output from the drain and decreased hematocrit. None of the patients with intraabdominal bleeding required reoperation. Of the 10 patients (1.68%) who presented with leaks, the diagnosis was made within 48 hours postoperatively in 5 patients (50%), based on the characteristics of the drain output. Nonoperative management with drainage and total parenteral nutrition was accomplished in 5 (50%) of the 10 patients with leaks. There was no mortality in the series. Conclusion: The routine use of abdominal drains after LRYGBP appears to be beneficial. Drains allowed early diagnosis of complications and in most cases, the successful treatment of leaks. When bleeding is suspected or documented, appropriate volume replacement therapy is mandatory to maintain adequate hemodynamic parameters. Drain output may orient the surgeon to take preventive measures such as discontinuing anticoagulation and early fluid resuscitation. In this series, in most cases the bleeding spontaneously stopped and no further surgical management was required.