Long-term effects of PERV-specific RNA interference in transgenic pigs

Semaan M, Kaulitz D, Petersen B, Niemann H, Denner J. Long‐term effects of PERV‐specific RNA interference in transgenic pigs. Xenotransplantation 2012; 19: 112–121. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) represent a risk of xenotransplantation using porcine cells, tissues, or organs, as they are integrated in the porcine genome and have been shown to be able to infect human cells in vitro. To increase viral safety by RNA interference, transgenic pigs expressing a PERV‐specific small hairpin (sh)RNA targeted to a highly conserved sequence in the pol gene (pol2) were generated in which expression of PERVs was reduced (Xenotransplantation, 15, 2008, 38). However, it remains to be shown how long expression of the shRNA and the RNA interference is effective in reducing PERV expression. Methods: To analyze the long‐term duration of RNA interference, expression of the PERV‐specific pol2 shRNA and inhibition of PERV expression was studied repeatedly in fibroblasts and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of transgenic pigs over a period of 3 yr, when animals were sacrificed and expression was studied in different organs. Expression of the PERV‐specific shRNA was measured using a newly developed real‐time PCR, and expression of PERV was measured using a PERV‐specific real‐time PCR. Results: Over a period of 3 yr, PERV‐specific shRNA and green fluorescent protein (GFP) as reporter of the vector system were consistently expressed in transgenic animals. PERV expression was significantly reduced during the entire period. Levels of PERV and shRNA expression were different in the various organs. PERV expression was highest in the spleen and the lungs and lowest in liver and heart. However, in all organs of the transgenic pigs, PERV expression was inhibited compared with the vector control animals. Conclusions: Transgenic pigs expressing PERV‐specific shRNA maintained their specific RNA interference long term, suggesting that PERV expression in the xenotransplants will be suppressed over extended periods of time.     

Safety of xenotransplantation: screening the donor pig and the recipient

Introduction: Xenotransplantation using pig cells and tissues may be associated with the transmission of porcine microorganisms including bacteria, parasites, fungi and viruses to the human recipient and may result in zoonones. Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) represent a special risk since PERV‐A and PERV‐B are present in the genome of all pigs and infect human cells. PERV‐C is not present in all pigs and does not infect human cells. However, recombinants between PERV‐A and PERV‐C have been observed in normal pigs characterised by higher replication rates compared with PERV‐A, and they are also able to infect human cells (1). Methods: In the past years numerous assays based on the PCR technology have been developed to screen for the prevalence and expression of PERV and other porcine microorganisms in the donor pig (2). Whereas most microorganisms may be eliminated by designated pathogen‐free breeding, PERVs cannot be removed this way. In addition, assays have been developed to analyse the recipient for the transmission of PERV and other microorganisms, either using PCR methods or immunological assays to detect an antibody production as a result of infection (3). Results: Using these assays, no transmission of PERV as well as of other porcine microorganisms has been observed in first preclinical and clinical xenotransplantations or animal infection experiments. This was especially true for the first clinical transplantation of pig islet cells approved by the New Zealand government (4). Until now there is no susceptible animal model to study PERV transmission and transplantations of porcine cells or organs to non‐human primates as they are associated with limitations concerning the safety aspect, which do not allow transmitting the negative findings to humans (5). Different experimental approaches are under development to reduce the probability of PERV transmission, e.g. the generation of transgenic pigs expressing PERV‐specific siRNA inhibiting PERV expression by RNA interference (6), genotypic selection of pigs with a low prevalence and expression of PERV and neutralising antibodies against the envelope proteins inhibiting PERV infection (7). Conclusion: Investigations of the last years resulted in highly sensitive and specific methods to study PERV and other microorganisms in donor pigs and human recipients of xenotransplants. These methods showed absence of PERV transmission in all investigated cases, both in more than 200 human xenotransplant recipients, mostly recipients of cellular xenotransplants, as well as in non‐human primates and small animals. New technologies under development may further decrease the probability of transmission. References: 1. Denner J. Recombinant porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV‐A/C): A new risk for xenotransplantation? Arch Virol 2008; 153: 1421–1426. 2. Kaulitz D, Mihica D, Dorna J, Costa MR, Petersen B, Niemann H, TÖnjes RR, Denner J. Development of sensitive methods for detection of porcine endogenous retrovirus‐C (PERV‐C) in the genome of pigs J Virol Methods 2011; 175(1): 60–65. 3. Denner, J. Infectious risk in xenotransplantation – what post‐transplant screening for the human recipient? Xenotransplantation 2011; 18(3): 151–157. 4. Wynyard S, Garkavenko O, Nathu D, Denner J, Elliott R. Microbiological safety of the first clinical pig islet xenotransplantation trial in New Zealand, submitted. 5. Mattiuzzo G, Takeuchi Y. Suboptimal porcine endogenous retrovirus infection in non‐human primate cells: implication for preclinical xenotransplantation. PLoS One 2010; 5(10): e13203. 6. Semaan M, Kaulitz D, Petersen B, Niemann H, Denner J. Long‐term effects of PERV‐specific RNA interference in transgenic pigs. Xenotransplantation 2012; 19(2): 112–21. 7. Kaulitz D, Fiebig U, Eschricht M, Wurzbacher C, Kurth R, Denner J. Generation of neutralising antibodies against porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs). Virology 2011; 411(1): 78–86.     

Is porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) transmission still relevant?

Xenotransplantation using porcine cells or organs may be associated with the risk of transmission of zoonotic microorganisms. Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) pose a potentially high risk because they are integrated into the genome of all pigs and PERV-A and PERV-B at least, which are present in all pigs, can infect human cells. However, PERV transmission could not be demonstrated in the first recipients of clinical xenotransplantation or after numerous experimental pig-to-non-human primate transplantations. In addition, inoculation of immunosuppressed small animals and non-human primates failed to result in demonstrable PERV infection. Nevertheless, strategies to reduce the possible danger of PERV transmission to humans, however low, could be of benefit for the large-scale clinical use of porcine xenotransplants. One strategy is to select pigs free of PERV-C, thereby preventing recombination with PERV-A. A second strategy involves the selection of animals that express only very low levels of PERV-A and PERV-B. To this end, sensitive and specific methods have been developed to allow the distribution and expression of PERV to be analyzed. A third strategy is to develop a vaccine capable of protecting against PERV transmission. Finally, a fourth strategy is based on the inhibition of PERV expression by RNA interference. Using PERV-specific short hairpin RNA (shRNA) and retroviral vectors, inhibition of PERV expression in primary pig cells was demonstrated and transgenic pigs were generated that show reduced PERV expression in all tissues analyzed. Intensive work is required to improve and to combine these strategies to further decrease the putative risk of PERV transmission following xenotransplantation.     

Emerging infectious diseases and xenotransplantation

A total of 335 infectious diseases was reported in the global human population between 1940 and 2004, the majority of which were caused by zoonotic pathogens [ 1 ]. Although viral pathogens constitute only 25%, some have spread worldwide with most starting from Central Africa. These include human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) causing acquired immunodeficiency syndromes (AIDS), chikungunya virus and West Nile virus, which also cause severe diseases in humans. HIV‐1 and HIV‐2, for example, are the result of trans‐species transmission from non‐human primates [ 2 ] to humans sometime in the last century. The spread of two henipaviruses causing fatal diseases in horses, pigs and humans has been observed in Asia and Australia, and although these viruses represent transspecies transmissions from bats, secondary transmissions from pigs to humans have also occurred. These and many other examples of emerging infectious diseases call for strong safety considerations in the field of xenotransplantation. Whereas known viruses can easily be eliminated from donor pigs, strategies should be developed to detect new zoonotic pathogens. In addition, all pigs carry porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) in their genome. Two of these, PERV‐A and PERV‐B, as wells as recombinant PERV‐A/C are able to infect human cells. The greatest threat appears to come from the recombinant PERV‐A/C viruses as they appear to have an increased infectivity [ 3 , 4 ]. An increase in PERV expression was not observed in multitransgenic pigs expressing DAF, TRAIL and HLAE, generated to prevent immune rejection [ 5 ]. Our laboratory has developed a variety of strategies to prevent PERV transmission following xenotransplantation: (i) selection of animals that do not harbour PERV‐C genomes in order to prevent recombination, (ii) selection of PERV‐A and PERV‐B low‐producers [ 6 ], (iii) development of an antiviral vaccine to protect xenotransplant recipients [ 7 ] and (iv) generation of transgenic pigs in which PERV expression is inhibited via RNA interference. Inhibition of PERV expression using either synthetic small interfering (si) RNA or short hairpin (sh) RNA was demonstrated in PERV infected human cells [ 8 ], in primary pig cells [ 9 ] and in all transgenic piglets born [ 10 ]. A second generation of pigs expressing PERV‐specific siRNA is now under study and experiments have been started to introduce multiple shRNA. Supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG, DE729/4.     

No in vivo infection of triple immunosuppressed non‐human primates after inoculation with high titers of porcine endogenous retroviruses*

Abstract: Background: Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) released from pig tissue can infect selected human cells in vitro and therefore represent a safety risk for xenotransplantation using pig cells, tissues, or organs. Although PERVs infect cells of numerous species in vitro, attempts to establish reliable animal models failed until now. Absence of PERV transmission has been shown in first experimental and clinical xenotransplantations; however, these trials suffered from the absence of long‐term exposure (transplant survival) and profound immunosuppression. Methods: We conducted infectivity studies in rhesus monkeys, pig‐tailed monkeys, and baboons under chronic immunosuppression with cyclosporine A, methylprednisolone, and the rapamycin derivative. These species were selected because they are close to the human species and PERVs can be transmitted in vitro to cells of these species. In addition, the animals received twice, a C1 esterase inhibitor to block complement activation before inoculation of PERV. In order to overcome the complications of microchimerism, animals were inoculated with high titers of cell‐free PERV. In addition, to enable transmission via cell–cell contact, some animals also received virus‐producing cells. For inoculation the primate cell‐adapted strain PERV/5° was used which is characterized by a high infectious titer. Produced on human cells, this virus does not express alpha 1,3 Gal epitopes, does not contain porcine antigens on the viral surface and is therefore less immunogenic in non‐human primates compared with pig cell‐derived virus. Finally, we present evidence that PERV/5° productively infects cells from baboons and rhesus monkeys. Results: In a follow‐up period of 11 months, no antibody production against PERV and no integration of proviral DNA in blood cells was observed. Furthermore, no PERV sequences were detected in the DNA of different organs taken after necropsy. Conclusion: These results indicate that in a primate model, in the presence of chronic immunosuppression, neither the inoculation of cell‐free nor cell‐associated PERV using a virus already adapted to primate cells results in an infection; this is despite the fact that peripheral blood mononuclear cells of the same animals are infectible in vitro.     

A polymerase chain reaction-based protocol for the detection of transmission of pig endogenous retroviruses in pig to human xenotransplantation

BACKGROUND: Xenotransplantation of pig organs and tissues to humans bears the risk of infection of immunosuppressed recipients by porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) released from the transplanted tissue. However, when diagnosing potential PERV transmission, it is essential to exclude microchimerism, i.e., persisting pig cells in analyzed bioptic material of xenotransplanted patients, which give rise to false positive PERV signals. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is so far the only suitable method to diagnose a cross-species transfer of PERV, but the exclusion of microchimerism might be a serious problem because most of the presently employed primer pairs detect PERV sequences with higher sensitivity than primers used for the detection of contaminating pig sequences. METHODS: We designed and evaluated a novel and improved primer set for detection of pig sequences as well as complementing positive control primers on the basis of mitochondrial cytochrome B, an approved marker for phylogenetic studies. We further established primer pairs derived from the long terminal repeat/leader region of PERV isolated from a Duroc German Landrace cross-bred pig and tested their sensitivity in comparison with known PERV- and pig-specific PCR markers. RESULTS: In standard PCR assays, the new cytochrome B-derived primers are at least 10 times more sensitive than the presently used PERV retroviral polymerase gene and mammalian beta-actin primers. When tested in a tissue culture infection model, PERV transmission to human 293 cells can be unambiguously demonstrated, even in the presence of up to 10% pig cells. One of the primer combinations derived from the PERV DuxDL3791 long terminal repeat/leader region amplifies with even lower sensitivity than primers detecting porcine beta-globin, thus permitting the exclusion of microchimerism also via chromosomal loci. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of the new PCR markers allows the proposal of a rigorous setup for the routine detection of PERV transmission after xenotransplantation.     

No evidence of infection with porcine endogenous retrovirus in recipients of encapsulated porcine islet xenografts

Transplantation of pig tissues into humans has the potential for cotransferring pig infections. Knowledge of the epidemiology of pig infections transmissible to humans allows the development of risk limitation strategies at the source herd level, but potentially infectious pig endogenous retrovirus (PERV) is ubiquitous in all domestic pigs and therefore is not avoidable. Using a specific and sensitive RT-PCR and nested PCR for PERV nucleic acids with primers, the screening of pigs from New Zealand herds for the presence and expression of the PERV was conducted. The presence of PERV proviral DNA (pol and env region) and viral RNA was demonstrated in all tested pig tissues including pancreas, liver, spleen, brain, heart, and PBMC. Using the same assays it was established that different tissues (liver, spleen, and heart) of nude and nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice previously transplanted with nonencapsulated pig islets were PERV DNA and RNA negative. Alginate polylysine capsules prepared with encapsulated pig islets were tested for possible leakage of viral particles or viral nucleic acids. RNA was extracted from the supernatant of viable encapsulated pig islet cells grown in culture for 2 months. No evidence of PERV RNA or of cellular nucleic acids could be found. Two adult type I diabetic subjects were transplanted with 1 x 10(6) neonatal pig islets encased in alginate capsules into the peritoneal cavity. One patient was immunosuppressed. Both showed evidence of graft function (up to 34% reduction in insulin dose, corresponding increase in serum pig C-peptide) for up to 2 years. DNA and RNA were extracted from PBMC and blood plasma of both patients at 19 months posttransplant. No evidence of PERV proviral DNA or RNA could be detected. Piglet islets contain PERV DNA and RNA, but this does not traverse the capsules used or produce any evidence of infection in nude and nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice or humans.     

Phylogenetic analysis of porcine endogenous retroviruses expressed in Chinese pigs based on envelope sequences

The promise of successful clinical xenotransplantation is now offset by the potential risk of transmission of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV). PERV consists of three subtypes according to the varieties of env sequences. We analyzed PERV subtypes in two species of Chinese pigs (Banna minipig inbred, BMI, and Wu-Zhi-Shan pig, WZSP). Positive A and B were detected while positive C was absent in the analyzed Chinese pigs. The polymerase chain reaction products were then cloned into a pGEM-T vector system and sequenced. Phylogenetic trees were constructed from the translated amino acids of PERVs and other type C and type D retrovirus, as well as the lentivirus in the GeneBank. The results suggested that PERV-A and PERV-B that exist in Chinese pig genomes share similarities with other PERV from the GeneBank and some type C retroviruses, including lymphotropic, leukemic and endogenous retroviruses.     

No evidence for infection of human cells with porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) after exposure to porcine fetal neuronal cells

BACKGROUND: Recent demonstration of human cell infection in vitro with porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) has raised safety concerns for new therapies that involve transplantation of pig cells or organs to humans. To assess better the specific risk that may be associated with the transplantation of fetal pig neuronal cells to the central nervous system of patients suffering from intractable neurologic disorders (Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, and epilepsy), we have performed studies to determine whether there is evidence for in vivo or in vitro transmission of PERV from fetal pig neuronal cells to human cells. METHODS: Ventral mesencephalon (VM) and lateral ganglionic eminence cells were isolated from fetal pigs and transplanted into patients with neurological conditions as part of clinical studies. Blood samples taken from patients at various time points posttransplant were tested for evidence of PERV. In vitro studies to test for PERV infection of human cells after cocultivation with either fetal porcine ventral mesencephalon or porcine fetal lateral ganglionic eminence cells were also performed. RESULTS: We found no evidence of PERV provirus integration in the DNA from PBMC of 24 neuronal transplant recipients. In addition, no PERV was released from cultured fetal porcine neuronal cultures, and there was no transfer of PERV from fetal pig neuronal cells to human cells in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate by both examination of transplant patient blood samples and in vitro studies that there is no evidence for transmission of PERV from porcine fetal neural cells to human cells.