Ventricular arrhythmias in the athlete

Life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in the athlete nearly always occur in the presence of structural heart disease. In the last few years, 2 new causes of life-threatening arrhythmias have been described in patients with normal hearts-that of the Brugada syndrome and that of commotio cordis. Non-life-threatening premature ventricular beats and even nonsustained ventricular tachycardia are not rare, and although usually benign, can be secondary to cardiomyopathies. Athletes with symptoms of syncope, especially if exertional, warrant a complete evaluation. The treatment of athletes and other individuals with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias has been revolutionized by the implantable cardioverter defibrillator, a device that affords excellent protection from sudden death. Defining those athletes who would benefit from the implantable defibrillator is not always clear. Furthermore, participation in competitive athletics for athletes with life-threatening arrhythmias or structural heart disease known to put the athlete at risk for life-threatening arrhythmias is usually prohibited.     

Long-term outcome of pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment for ventricular arrhythmias

Recent advances of nonpharmacological therapy such as catheter ablation and implantable cardioverter defibrillator and lessons from the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial(CAST) have changed the strategy for ventricular arrhythmias. The safety and efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation of symptomatic sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia without structural heart disease has made ablation the firstline curative therapy. In idiopathic ventricular fibrillation such as Brugada syndrome, an implantable cardioverter defibrillator is the most effective treatment to prevent sudden cardiac death. In patients with asymptomatic ventricular tachyarrhythmias in heart failure, class I antiarrhythmic drugs should be avoided due to proarrhythmic and negative inotropic effects that may be responsible for increased mortality in some trials. In such patients, amiodarone and beta-blocker may reduce sudden cardiac death. For patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in heart failure, amiodarone or implantable cardioverter defibrillator should be considered. In comparison with amiodarone, implantable cardioverter defibrillator markedly reduced sudden death in ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation survivors in Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibriltors(AVID). Although better patient selection and clarification of mapping criteria improved the successful ablation rate in patients with structural heart disease, candidates of ablation are few. In patients with extensive structural heart disease, multiple ventricular tachycardias are often present. Catheter ablation of a single ventricular tachycardia may be only palliative. Therefore, implantable cardioverter defibrillator is the most effective treatment to prevent sudden cardiac death, with amiodarone and ablation as the adjunctive therapy to prevent frequent ventricular tachycardia. Furthermore, an implantable cardioverter defibrillator improved survival in selected patients with depressed ventricular function after myocardial infarction, who also have nonsustained and inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia in Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial(MADIT) and Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial(MUSTT).     

Brugada and Long QT‐3 Syndromes: Two Phenotypes of the Sodium Channel Disease

Brugada and long QT‐3 syndromes are two allelic diseases caused by different mutations in SCN5A gene inherited by an autosomal dominant pattern with variable penetrance. Both of these syndromes are ion channel diseases of the heart manifest on surface electrocardiogram by ST‐segment elevation in the right precordial leads and prolonged QT_c interval, respectively, with predilection for polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and sudden death, which may be the first manifestation of the disease. Brugada syndrome usually manifests during adulthood with male preponderance, whereas long QT3 syndrome usually manifests in teenage years, although it can also manifest in adulthood. Class IA and IC antiarrhythmic drugs increase ST‐segment elevation and predilection for polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation in Brugada syndrome, whereas these agents shorten the repolarization and QT_c interval, and thus may be beneficial in long QT‐3 syndrome. Beta‐blockade also increases the ST‐segment elevation in Brugada syndrome but decreases the dispersion of repolarization in long QT‐3 syndrome. Mexiletine, a class IB sodium channel blocker decreases QT_c interval as well as dispersion of repolarization in long QT‐3 syndrome but has no effect on Brugada syndrome. The only effective treatment available at this time for Brugada syndrome is implantable cardioverter defibrillator, although repeated episodes of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia can be treated with isoproterenol. In symptomatic patients of long QT‐3 syndrome in whom the torsade de pointes is bradycardia‐dependent or pause‐dependent, a pacemaker could be used to avoid bradycardia and pauses and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator is indicated where arrhythmia is not controlled with pacemaker and beta‐blockade. However, the combination of new devices with pacemaker and cardioverter‐defibrillator capabilities appear promising in these patients warranting further study.     

A novel treatment strategy for therapy refractory ventricular arrhythmias in the setting of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia.

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD) is a major cause of ventricular tachycardia and cardiac arrest in young adults. The ideal management of this genetic disorder is individual. The treatment options are antiarrhythmic drug therapy, transcatheter radiofrequency catheter ablation, implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy, and surgical treatment [Kies P, Bootsma M, Bax J, Schalij MJ, van der Wall EE. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy: screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Heart Rhythm 2006;3:225-34; Verma A, Kilicaslan F, Schweikert RA et al. Short- and long-term success of substrate-based mapping and ablation of ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. Circulation 2005;111:3209-16]. In the following, we describe a unique case of a young patient, presenting with therapy refractory ventricular arrhythmias in the setting of ARVD, who following failed catheter ablations, has been successfully treated with beating heart cryoablation.     

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) is a highly malignant form of arrhythmogenic disorder characterized by exercise- or emotional-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in the absence of detectable structural heart disease. Because of the typical pattern of arrhythmias (bidirectional ventricular tachycardia and the occurrence and severity of arrhythmia correlated well with exercise workload) during exercise stress test, CPVT can be identified promptly. Molecular genetic screening of the genes encoding the cardiac ryanodine receptor and calsequestrin is critical to confirm uncertain diagnosis of CPVT. With the exception of beta-blockers, no pharmacologic therapy of proven effectiveness is available: although beta-blockers reduce the occurrence of ventricular tachycardia, 30% of patients treated with beta-blockers still experience cardiac arrhythmias and eventually require implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation to prevent cardiac arrest.     

Long-QT-Syndrom und Brugada-Syndrom

Long QT syndrome and Brugada syndrome are potentially fatal inherited arrhythmogenic diseases. Thanks to the contribution of molecular genetics, the genetic bases, pathogenesis, and genotype-phenotype correlation of both diseases have been progressively unveiled and shown to have an extremely high degree of genetic heterogeneity. The clinical manifestation of the diseases is also highly variable. Symptomatic patients experience ventricular tachyarrhythmias which may lead to recurrent syncope and/or sudden cardiac death. In long QT syndrome patients with syncope, therapy with beta-blockers has proven effective. When, despite beta-blocker treatment, arrhythmia-related symptoms continue to occur, an implantable cardioverter defibrillator is indicated. Such a device should also be implanted in resuscitated patients. In symptomatic patients with Brugada syndrome, the implantable cardioverter defibrillator is the only life-saving option. In asymptomatic patients with a Brugada ECG pattern, risk stratification has become of utmost importance in order to discover which patients really need definitive treatment.     

Primär elektrische Herzerkrankungen im Erwachsenenalter—

Sudden cardiac death accounts for 100,000 victims in Germany per year. Predominantly, patients with structural heart disease such as coronary artery disease or dilated cardiomyopathy are affected. However, approximately 5-10% of sudden deaths hit patients without structural disease of the heart. The proportion of young patients (< 40 years of age) in this group is even higher (10-20%). In younger patients significantly more diseases like hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia and primary electrical diseases of the heart could be observed such as long QT syndrome, short QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. The primary electrical diseases are different concerning their electrocardiographical pattern, clinical triggers of arrhythmias, results of invasive diagnostics and therapy. Meanwhile, molecular genetic screening can reveal specific mutations of ion channels and can identify consecutive functional defects. The significance of programmed ventricular stimulation is at present unclear concerning risk stratification in patients with Brugada syndrome and short QT syndrome and of no significance in long QT syndrome and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardias. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator is the therapy of choice in most symptomatic patients. With increasing knowledge as a result of sophisticated molecular genetic screening, identification of underlying ion channel defects and new details of the mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis, a potential genotype-guided therapy will gain more importance in the future.     

Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) is a highly lethal form of inherited arrhythmogenic disease characterized by adrenergically mediated polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. The mutations in cardiac ryanodine receptor and calsequestrin genes are responsible for the autosomal dominant and recessive variants of CPVT, respectively. The clinical presentation encompasses exercise- or emotion-induced syncopal events and a distinctive pattern of reproducible, stress-related, bidirectional ventricular tachycardia in the absence of both structural heart disease and a prolonged QT interval. The mortality rate in untreated individuals is 30-50% by age 40. Clinical evaluation by exercise stress testing and holter monitoring and genetic screening can facilitate early diagnosis. beta-adrenergic blockers are the most effective pharmacological treatment in controlling arrhythmias in CPVT patients, yet about 30% of patients still experience cardiac arrhythmias and eventually require an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.     

Development of device therapy for ventricular arrhythmias

The past 25 years have seen the implantable cardioverter defibrillator emerge as the treatment of choice for ventricular arrhythmias with reduction in size but increased therapeutic options. Understanding the complex mechanisms of ventricular arrhythmias and defibrillation in normal and diseased hearts has been the focus of many research teams including that of John Uther at the Westmead Hospital Department of Cardiology. Marked improvements in capacitor and battery technologies, arrhythmia discrimination, pacing algorithms, shock waveforms and monitoring capabilities enable wider use and patient acceptance. Emergence of cardiac resynchronisation therapy and the implantable defibrillator for treatment of chronic heart failure is not only giving quality of life and extended survival for heart failure patients but has also cast new light on the evolution of heart failure.     

A comprehensive approach to management of ventricular arrhythmias

This review presents five cases that highlight the complexity of taking care of patients with ventricular arrhythmias. Three of the cases discuss management of patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in the setting of structural heart disease: dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and after myocardial infarction. A fourth case asks whether data from implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) trials can be extrapolated to older patients, and the fifth case discusses management of recurrent ventricular arrhythmias in a patient with an ICD.     

Devices for the management of ventricular arrhythmias in cardiac failure

Heart failure is a common clinical syndrome with a high morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in medical treatment, death from dangerous ventricular arrhythmias is frequently implicated. Emerging evidence supports the use of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator for selected patients. This includes secondary prevention indications for patients who have survived life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. In addition, patients who have not suffered spontaneous sustained ventricular arrhythmias, but who are at high risk for sudden arrhythmic death are starting to be recognized as candidates for ICD therapy. At present the only primary prevention indication with a good evidence base is the presence of inducible ventricular arrhythmias at electrophysiologic testing in patients with prior myocardial infarction, impaired left ventricular systolic function and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia on Holter monitoring. Studies planned or in progress are likely to expand further the role of device therapy in the treatment of patients with cardiac failure.     

Avoiding sports-related sudden cardiac death in children with congenital channelopathy

For the past few years, children affected by an inherited channelopathy have been counseled to avoid (recreational) sports activities and all competitive sports so as to prevent exercise-induced arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. An increased understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms, better anti-arrhythmic strategies, and, in particular, more epidemiological data on exercise-induced arrhythmia in active athletes with channelopathies have changed the universal recommendation of “no sports,” leading to revised, less strict, and more differentiated guidelines (published by the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology in 2015). In this review, we outline the disease- and genotype-specific mechanisms of exercise-induced arrhythmia; give an overview of trigger-, symptom-, and genotype-dependent guidance in sports activities for children with long QT syndrome (LQTS), Brugada syndrome (BrS), catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), or short QT syndrome (SQTS); and highlight the novelties in the current guidelines compared with previous versions. While it is still recommended for patients with LQT1 and CPVT (even when asymptomatic) and all symptomatic LQTS patients (independent of genotype) to avoid any competitive and high-intensity sports, other LQTS patients successfully treated with anti-arrhythmic therapies and phenotype-negative genotype-positive patients may be allowed to perform sports at different activity levels – provided they undergo regular, sophisticated evaluations to detect any changes in arrhythmogenic risk.

     

Arrhythmogenesis in Brugada syndrome: Impact and constrains of current concepts

Brugada syndrome (BrS), an inherited arrhythmogenic disease first described in 1992, is characterized by ST segment elevations on the electrocardiogram in the right precordium and by a high occurrence of arrhythmias including the life-threatening ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation. Knowledge of the underlying mechanisms of formation of arrhythmogenic substrate in BrS is essential, namely for the risk stratification of BrS patients and their therapy which is still restrained almost exclusively to the implantation of cardioverter/defibrillator. In spite of many crucial findings in this field published within recent years, the final consistent view has not been established so far. Hence, BrS described 20 years ago remains an actual topic of both clinical and experimental studies. This review presents an overview of the current knowledge related to the pathogenesis of BrS arrhythmogenic substrate, namely of the genetic basis of BrS, functional consequences of mutations related to BrS, and arrhythmogenic mechanisms in BrS.     

Circadian variation of malignant ventricular arrhythmias in patients with ischemic and nonischemic heart disease after cardioverter defibrillator implantation. European 7219 Jewel Investigators.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the circadian variation of ventricular arrhythmias detected by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator in patients with and without ischemic heart disease. BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown a circadian variation of ventricular arrhythmias, sudden death and myocardial infarction with a peak occurrence in the morning hours. The circadian pattern, which is similar for both arrhythmic and ischemic events, suggests that ischemia may play a critical role in the genesis of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death. We hypothesized that, if ischemia plays an important role in the triggering of ventricular arrhythmias, the circadian pattern should be different in patients with ischemic heart disease compared with patients with nonischemic heart disease. METHODS: The circadian variation of ventricular arrhythmias recorded by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator was studied in 310 patients during a mean follow-up of 181 +/- 163 days. Two hundred four patients had a history of ischemic heart disease and 106 patients had nonischemic heart disease. The times of the episodes of ventricular arrhythmias were retrieved from the data log of each device during follow-up, and the circadian pattern was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: During follow-up, 1,061 episodes of ventricular arrhythmias were recorded by the device in the 310 patients. Six hundred eighty-two episodes occurred in the group of patients with ischemic heart disease and 379 occurred in the nonischemic heart disease group. The circadian variation of the episodes showed a typical pattern with a morning and afternoon peak in both groups of patients with ischemic and nonischemic heart disease, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The circadian rhythm of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with ischemic heart disease is similar to patients with nonischemic heart disease, suggesting that the trigger mechanisms of the initiation of ventricular tachyarrhythmias may be similar, irrespective of the underlying heart disease.     

Ventricular arrhythmias in congestive heart failure

Despite advances in the treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF), the mortality rate continues to be high. A large number of the deaths are sudden, presumably due to ventricular arrhythmias. Complex ventricular arrhythmias are recorded in as many as 80% of patients with CHF, with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia occurring in 40%. The latter appears to be an independent predictor of mortality. Chronic structural abnormalities responsible for CHF may be the basis for the capability of a ventricle to support life-threatening arrhythmias, which are triggered by premature ventricular contractions. The pathogenesis of arrhythmias is multifactorial. Electrolyte abnormalities, ischemia, catecholamines, inotropic and antiarrhythmic drugs may worsen arrhythmias and increase susceptibility of a ventricle to sustained arrhythmias. Beta-adrenergic blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have a beneficial effect. The role of various drugs in the pathogenesis and treatment of ventricular arrhythmias is discussed. The efficacy of antiarrhythmic therapy targeted to asymptomatic nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, in order to prevent sudden death, is controversial. Pharmacotherapy guided by electrophysiologic testing is the treatment of choice for patients who have manifest sustained ventricular tachycardia, but patients resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation may require automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator.     

Is There a Role for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Long QT Syndrome?

ICDs in Long QT Syndrome. The congenital familial long QT syndrome (LQTS) is characterized by QT interval prolongation on ECG and potentially life‐threatening polymorphic ventricular arrhythmias. Antiadrenergic therapy, i.e., beta‐adrenoceptor blockade, left cardiac sympathetic denervation, and occasionally pacemaker therapy, sufficiently protects most LQTS patients. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator treatment, with some specific problems and setting requirements in LQTS patients, should at least be considered or implanted in patients with recurrent arrhythmias despite adequate antiadrenergic therapy. Some genetic subtypes, such as LQTS3, may not respond as well (or even adversely) to antiadrenergic therapy and, thus, benefit more from implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.     

Clinical and molecular genetics of the short QT syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Sudden cardiac death in patients without structural heart disease remains a challenge in diagnostics and risk stratification. Genetically determined arrhythmias are a potential cause for a primary electrical disease. A recently discovered primary electrical disease is discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: The inherited short QT syndrome is a recently recognized genetic condition, which is associated with atrial fibrillation, syncope and/or sudden cardiac death. Attention has been focused on diagnostic ECG features, the identification of underlying mutations and mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis. SUMMARY: The short QT syndrome is clinically associated with atrial fibrillation, syncope and sudden cardiac death. A shortened QT interval (QTc <360 ms) and reduced ventricular refractory period together with an increased dispersion of repolarization constitute the potential substrate for reentry and life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmia. To date, gain-of-function mutations in KCNH2, KCNQ1, KCNJ2, encoding potassium channels and loss-of-function mutations in CACNA1C and CACNB2b, encoding L-type calcium channel subunits have been identified. The therapy of choice is the implantable cardioverter defibrillator in symptomatic patients. Quinidine has been shown to prolong the QT interval and to normalize the effective refractory periods of the atrium and ventricle in patients with short QT-1 syndrome.     

Management of Patients with the Hereditary Long QT Syndrome

Long QT Syndrome. The hereditary long QT syndrome is an inherited ion channel disorder with QT prolongation, morphologic changes in the T waves, and a relatively high frequency of syncope, T wave alternans, torsades de pointes-type ventricular tachycardia, and sudden death. Monotherapy with beta blockers is the treatment of first choice. In patients with recurrent syncope despite therapy with beta blockers, pacemakers and/or ganglionectomy may be useful in selected cases, with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator used as a fail-safe approach in high-risk patients.     

Statins, ventricular arrhythmias and heart rate variability in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators and coronary heart disease

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias and heart rate variability were influenced by statin treatment and lipid levels in patients treated with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Heart rate variability measurements were performed in 86 patients with coronary heart disease and an ICD implant. The number of events with ventricular fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia were recorded during a 12-month period. This study lends little support for an antiarrhythmic effect of statins or any relation between plasma lipids and lipoproteins and malignant ventricular arrhythmias in patients with an ICD.