Clinical pharmacokinetics of cholinesterase inhibitors

This review deals mainly with the pharmacokinetics of the reversible quaternary cholinesterase inhibitors neostigmine, pyridostigmine and edrophonium, which are mainly used to antagonise non-depolarising neuromuscular blockade in general anaesthesia and in the symptomatic treatment of myasthenia gravis. Only in the last few years, since the introduction of highly sensitive and selective analytical procedures based on gas and liquid chromatography, have proper pharmacokinetic studies of these drugs become possible. Rapid cooling and addition of internal standard to samples before freezing are important precautions in view of the poor stability of the cholinesterase inhibitors in plasma and blood. Plasma clearances of the reversible quaternary cholinesterase inhibitors are in the range 0.5 to 1.0 L/h/kg and their apparent volumes of distribution range from 0.5 to 1.7 L/kg. Accordingly, the drugs have short plasma elimination half-lives, in the order of 30 to 90 minutes. One to two hours after oral administration of 60 mg pyridostigmine, peak plasma concentrations of 40 to 60 micrograms/L are observed, whereas the plasma concentrations of neostigmine after a 30 mg oral dose are only 1 to 5 micrograms/L. The oral bioavailability of these hydrophilic ionised compounds is low: that of pyridostigmine is approximately 10% and the value for neostigmine is even lower. In spite of the short elimination half-life of pyridostigmine, intraindividual variations in plasma concentration during a dose interval are small in myasthenic patients receiving oral maintenance therapy, probably as a result of slow absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. Severely impaired renal function has been shown to prolong the elimination of neostigmine and pyridostigmine, while methylcellulose has been reported to inhibit the absorption of the latter drug completely. Other pharmacokinetic drug interactions suggested so far do not seem to be of clinical significance. Although a positive correlation has been demonstrated between the plasma concentrations of these drugs and their pharmacological effects as measured by a decrement in muscle response to repetitive nerve stimulation in a single muscle, this relationship is less clear when a global evaluation of muscular function in myasthenia gravis is used. Pharmacokinetic studies of the tertiary reversible cholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine, an important tool in experimental cholinergic neuropharmacology, are still in their initial stages. This drug too is characterised by a short plasma elimination half-life of 20 to 30 minutes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and pharmacodynamics of artemether-lumefantrine.

The combination of artemether and lumefantrine (benflumetol) is a new and very well tolerated oral antimalarial drug effective even against multidrug-resistant falciparum malaria. The artemether component is absorbed rapidly and biotransformed to dihydroartemisinin, and both are eliminated with terminal half-lives of around 1 hour. These are very active antimalarials which give a rapid reduction in parasite biomass and consequent rapid resolution of symptoms. The lumefantrine component is absorbed variably in malaria, and is eliminated more slowly (half-life of 3 to 6 days). Absorption is very dependent on coadministration with fat, and so improves markedly with recovery from malaria. Thus artemether clears most of the infection, and the lumefantrine concentrations that remain at the end of the 3- to 5-day treatment course are responsible for eliminating the residual 100 to 10 000 parasites. The area under the curve of plasma lumefantrine concentrations versus time, or its correlate the plasma concentration on day 7. has proved an important determinant of therapeutic response. Characterisation of these pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships provided the basis for dosage optimisation, an approach that could be applied to other antimalarial drugs.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vildagliptin

Vildagliptin is an orally active, potent and selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, shown to be effective and well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as either monotherapy or in combination with other anti-diabetic agents. Vildagliptin possesses several desirable pharmacokinetic properties that contribute to its lower variability and low potential for drug interaction. Following oral administration, vildagliptin is rapidly and well absorbed with an absolute bioavailability of 85%. An approximately dose-proportional increase in exposure to vildagliptin over the dose range of 25-200?mg has been reported. Food does not have a clinically relevant impact on the pharmacokinetics of vildagliptin, and it can be taken without regard to food. Vildagliptin is minimally bound to plasma proteins (9.3%) and, on the basis of a volume of distribution of 71?L, it is considered to distribute extensively into extravascular spaces. Renal clearance of vildagliptin (13?L/h) accounts for 33% of the total body clearance after intravenous administration (41?L/h). The primary elimination pathway is hydrolysis by multiple tissues/organs. The DPP-4 enzyme contributes to the formation of the major hydrolysis metabolite, LAY151; therefore, vildagliptin is also a substrate of DPP-4. Vildagliptin has a low potential for drug interactions, as cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes are minimally (<1.6%) involved in the overall metabolism. Clinical pharmacokinetic studies have reported the lack of drug interaction with several drugs (metformin, pioglitazone, glyburide, simvastatin, amlodipine, valsartan, ramipril, digoxin and warfarin) that are likely to be frequently co-administered to patients with T2DM. In particular, vildagliptin does not affect the pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone, glyburide, warfarin and simvastatin; therefore, it is not expected to affect the pharmacokinetics of a drug that is a substrate for CYP2C8, CYP2C9 or CYP3A4. In the elderly, vildagliptin exposure increases by approximately 30%, which is considered to be mostly attributable to compromised renal function in the elderly population and is not considered to be clinically relevant. Vildagliptin has been demonstrated to be efficacious, safe and well tolerated in elderly patients with T2DM without dose adjustment. In subjects with varying degrees of renal impairment, vildagliptin exposure increases by approximately 2-fold; however, the increase in the exposure does not correlate with the severity of renal impairment. The lack of a clear correlation between the increased exposure and the severity of renal impairment is considered to be attributable to the fact that the kidneys contribute to both the excretion and the hydrolysis metabolism of vildagliptin. Hepatic impairment, gender, body mass index (BMI) and ethnicity do not have an influence on the pharmacokinetics of vildagliptin. These findings suggest that vildagliptin can be used in a diverse patient population without dose adjustment. Oral administration of vildagliptin to patients with T2DM completely inhibits DPP-4 activity at a variety of doses. The onset of DPP-4 inhibition is rapid, and the duration of DPP-4 inhibition is dose dependent. Vildagliptin is a potent inhibitor of the DPP-4 enzyme, with a concentration required to achieve 50% DPP-4 inhibition (IC(50)) of 4.5?nmol/L in patients with T2DM. Similar potency of DPP-4 inhibition by vildagliptin has been reported in different ethnic groups, indicating that ethnicity does not affect the pharmacodynamics of vildagliptin. Vildagliptin significantly increases the active glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) levels by approximately 2- to 3-fold and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) levels by approximately 5-fold, and significantly suppresses the postprandial glucagon levels in response to a meal or following an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in patients with T2DM. Vildagliptin significantly reduces both fasting and postprandial glucose levels over the dose range of 50-100?mg daily (administered either once daily or twice daily), and there are no substantial additional benefits of doses greater than 50?mg twice daily. The primary clinical dosing regimen is 50?mg twice daily as monotherapy or in combination with metformin. Vildagliptin increases the insulin levels following an OGTT and an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT), and the stimulation of insulin secretion is glucose dependent. Vildagliptin has been shown to improve beta-cell function on the basis of pharmacodynamic modelling taking the reduced glucose levels into account. The improvement of beta-cell function by vildagliptin has been confirmed after chronic treatment with vildagliptin for up to 2 years. Reduction of the endogenous glucose production appears to contribute to the glucose-lowering effects. Unlike the GLP-1 receptor agonists, vildagliptin does not affect gastric emptying, and this is consistent with the favourable gastrointestinal safety profile. Vildagliptin improves the sensitivity of the alpha cell to glucose in patients with T2DM by enhancing the alpha-cell responsiveness to both suppressive effects of hyperglycaemia and stimulatory effects of hypoglycaemia. Consistently, a lower incidence of hypoglycaemic events with vildagliptin is reported when it is used as either monotherapy or in combination with other anti-diabetic agents, such as metformin or insulin, as compared with a sulphonylurea. Numerous long-term clinical trials of up to 2 years have demonstrated that vildagliptin 50?mg once daily or twice daily is effective, safe and well tolerated in patients with T2DM as either monotherapy or in combination with a variety of other anti-diabetic agents.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of isepamicin

Isepamicin is an aminoglycoside antibacterial with properties similar to those of amikacin, but with better activity against strains producing type I 6'-acetyltransferase. The antibacterial spectrum includes Enterobacteriaceae and staphylococci. Anaerobes, Neisseriaceae and streptococci are resistant. The lower and upper break-points are 8 and 16 mg/L. Like other aminoglycosides, isepamicin exhibits a strong concentration-dependent bactericidal effect, a long post-antibiotic effect (several hours) and induces adaptive resistance. Isepamicin is administered intravenously or intramuscularly at a dosage of 15 mg/kg once daily or 7.5 mg/kg twice daily. Isepamicin is not bound to plasma proteins, and it distributes in extracellular fluids and into some cells (outer hair cells, kidney cortex) by active transport. Isepamicin is not metabolised and is eliminated solely via the renal route with an elimination half-life (t 1/2 beta) of 2 to 3 hours in adults with normal renal function. The clearance of isepamicin is reduced in neonates, and 7.5 mg/kg once daily is recommended in children <16 days old. Clearance is also reduced in the elderly, but no dosage adjustment is required. In patients with chronic renal impairment, isepamicin clearance is proportional to creatinine clearance (CLCR); the recommended regimen is 8 mg/kg with an administration interval of 24 hours in moderate impairment, 48 hours in severe impairment, 72 hours for CL(CR) 0.6 to 1.14 L/h (10 to 19 ml/min) and 96 hours for CL(CR) 0.36 to 0.54 L/h (6 to 9 ml/min). In end-stage renal failure, isepamicin is eliminated by haemodialysis, but the administration interval should be determined by monitoring the plasma concentration. Compared with healthy volunteers, patients in the intensive care unit or with neutropenic cancer have an increased volume of distribution and a lower clearance, but the 15 mg/kg once daily regimen remains adequate. Isepamicin kinetics are linear in the range 7.5 to 25 mg/kg, so that dosage adjustments, if necessary, are straightforward. Isepamicin can induce nephro-, vestibulo- and oto-toxicity. However, animal and clinical studies show that isepamicin is one of the less toxic aminoglycosides. The usefulness of maintaining serum aminoglycoside concentrations within a therapeutic range remains controversial. With isepamicin, it is proposed to achieve a 1-hour concentration (30 minutes after a 30-minute infusion) >40 mg/L to maximise bactericidal efficacy, and a 'trough' concentration (at the end of the administration interval) <5 mg/L to minimise toxicity. These thresholds should be modified on an individual basis, considering covariates such as concomitant treatment, underlying disease, nature of bacterial strain and site of infection.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of aliskiren

Aliskiren is the first orally bioavailable direct renin inhibitor approved for the treatment of hypertension. It acts at the point of activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, or renin system, inhibiting the conversion of angiotensinogen to angiotensin I by renin and thereby reducing the formation of angiotensin II by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and ACE-independent pathways. Aliskiren is a highly potent inhibitor of human renin in vitro (concentration of aliskiren that produces 50% inhibition of renin 0.6 nmol/L). Aliskiren is rapidly absorbed following oral administration, with maximum plasma concentrations reached within 1-3 hours. The absolute bioavailability of aliskiren is 2.6%. The binding of aliskiren to plasma proteins is moderate (47-51%) and is independent of the concentration. Once absorbed, aliskiren is eliminated through the hepatobiliary route as unchanged drug and, to a lesser extent, through oxidative metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. Unchanged aliskiren accounts for approximately 80% of the drug in the plasma following oral administration, indicating low exposure to metabolites. The two major oxidized metabolites of aliskiren account for less than 5% of the drug in the plasma at the time of the maximum concentration. Aliskiren excretion is almost completely via the biliary/faecal route; 0.6% of the dose is recovered in the urine. Steady-state plasma concentrations of aliskiren are reached after 7-8 days of once-daily dosing, and the accumulation factor for aliskiren is approximately 2. After reaching the peak, the aliskiren plasma concentration declines in a multiphasic fashion. No clinically relevant effects of gender or race on the pharmacokinetics of aliskiren are observed, and no adjustment of the initial aliskiren dose is required for elderly patients or for patients with renal or hepatic impairment. Aliskiren showed no clinically significant increases in exposure during coadministration with a wide range of potential concomitant medications, although increases in exposure were observed with P-glycoprotein inhibitors. Aliskiren does not inhibit or induce CYP isoenzyme or P-glycoprotein activity, although aliskiren is a substrate for P-glycoprotein, which contributes to its relatively low bioavailability. Aliskiren is approved for the treatment of hypertension at once-daily doses of 150 mg and 300 mg. Phase II and III clinical studies involving over 12,000 patients with hypertension have demonstrated that aliskiren provides effective long-term blood pressure (BP) lowering with a good safety and tolerability profile at these doses. Aliskiren inhibits plasma renin activity (PRA) by up to 80% following both single and multiple oral-dose administration. Similar reductions in PRA are observed when aliskiren is administered in combination with agents that alone increase PRA, including diuretics (hydrochlorothiazide, furosemide [frusemide]), ACE inhibitors (ramipril) and angiotensin receptor blockers (valsartan), despite greater increases in the plasma renin concentration. Moreover, PRA inhibition and BP reductions persist for 2-4 weeks after stopping treatment, which is likely to be of benefit in patients with hypertension who occasionally miss a dose of medication. Preliminary data on the antiproteinuric effects of aliskiren in type 2 diabetes mellitus suggest that renoprotective effects beyond BP lowering may be possible. Further studies to evaluate the effects of aliskiren on cardiovascular outcomes and target organ protection are ongoing and will provide important new data on the role of direct renin inhibition in the management of hypertension and other cardiovascular disease.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of repaglinide

Repaglinide is a novel, fast-acting prandial oral hypoglycaemic agent developed for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes whose disease cannot be controlled by diet and exercise alone. Although repaglinide binds to the sulphonylurea binding sites on pancreatic beta-cells and has a similar mechanism of action, repaglinide exhibits distinct pharmacological properties compared with these agents. Following administration, repaglinide is absorbed rapidly and has a fast onset of dose-dependent blood-glucose lowering effect. The drug is eliminated rapidly via the biliary route, without accumulation in the plasma after multiple doses. Repaglinide is well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes, including elderly patients and patients with hepatic or renal impairment. The pharmacokinetic profile of repaglinide and the improvements in post-prandial hyperglycaemia and overall glycaemic control make repaglinide suitable for administration preprandially, with the opportunity for flexible meal arrangements, including skipped meals, without the risk of hypoglycaemia.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of linagliptin

Linagliptin is an orally active small-molecule inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4, which was first licensed in the US, Europe, Japan and other territories in 2011 to improve glycaemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Linagliptin is the first and thus far the only DPP-4 inhibitor, and oral antihyperglycaemic drug in general, to be approved as a single-strength once-daily dose (5 mg). Compared with other available DPP-4 inhibitors, linagliptin has a unique pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile that is characterized by target-mediated nonlinear pharmacokinetics, concentration-dependent protein binding, minimal renal clearance and no requirements for dose adjustment for any intrinsic or extrinsic factor. After single or multiple oral doses of 1-10 mg, linagliptin displays less than dose-proportional increases in maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). Linagliptin is rapidly absorbed after oral administration, with C(max) occurring after approximately 90 minutes, and reaches steady-state concentrations within 4 days. With the therapeutic dose, steady-state C(max) (11-12 nmol/L) and AUC (～150 nmol · h/L) are approximately 1.3-fold greater than after a single dose, indicating little drug accumulation with repeat dosing. Linagliptin exhibits concentration-dependent protein binding in human plasma in vitro (99% at 1 nmol/L to 75-89% at >30 nmol/L) and has a large apparent volume of distribution, demonstrating extensive distribution into tissues. The nonlinear pharmacokinetics of linagliptin are best described by a two-compartmental model that incorporates target-mediated drug disposition resulting from high-affinity, saturable binding to DPP-4. The oral bioavailability of linagliptin estimated with this model is approximately 30%. Linagliptin has a long terminal half-life (>100 hours); however, its accumulation half-life is much shorter (approximately 10 hours), accounting for the rapid attainment of steady state. The majority of linagliptin is eliminated as parent compound, demonstrating that metabolism plays a minor role in the overall pharmacokinetics in humans. The main, pharmacologically inactive S-3-hydroxypiperidinyl metabolite accounted for approximately 17% of the total drug-related compounds in plasma. Linagliptin is eliminated primarily in faeces, with only around 5% of the oral therapeutic dose excreted in the urine at steady state. Linagliptin potently inhibits DPP-4 (inhibition constant 1 nmol/L), and trough drug concentrations achieved with therapeutic dosing inhibit >80% of plasma DPP-4 activity, the threshold associated with maximal antihyperglycaemic effects in animal models. There are no clinically relevant alterations in linagliptin pharmacokinetics resulting from renal impairment, hepatic impairment, coadministration with food, race, body weight, sex or age. In vitro, linagliptin is a weak substrate and weak inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and permeability glycoprotein (P-gp) but not of other CYP isozymes or ATP-binding cassette transporters. Clinical studies have revealed no relevant drug interactions when coadministered with other drugs commonly prescribed to patients with type 2 diabetes, including the narrow therapeutic index drugs warfarin and digoxin. Linagliptin plasma exposure is reduced by potent inducers of CYP3A4 or P-gp. Linagliptin has demonstrated a large safety window (>100-fold the recommended daily dose) and clinically relevant antihyperglycaemic effects in patients with type 2 diabetes.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled insulin

The benefits of intensive insulin therapy in the prevention of complications in patients with diabetes mellitus are now well established. However, the current methods of insulin administration fall well short of the ideal. Consequently, alternative routes of insulin administration have been investigated. The pulmonary route has received the most attention, helped by advances in inhaler devices and insulin formulation technology. As a result, several insulin inhalation systems are at varying stages of development, with one already filed for marketing approval in Europe. Knowledge of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the various inhaled insulin formulations will help to determine their positioning in current and evolving diabetes treatment strategies. For instance, a rapid onset and short duration of action would be desirable for use in postprandial glucose control. Pharmacokinetic studies with inhaled insulin reveal that serum insulin concentrations peak earlier and decay more rapidly following inhalation compared with subcutaneously administered regular insulin, and pharmacodynamic studies measuring glucose infusion rate under euglycaemic glucose clamp show corresponding rapid changes in glucose control. Furthermore, intrapatient variability in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled insulin is low; variability is similar to (or perhaps less than) that seen when insulin is administered subcutaneously. Estimates of the bioavailability and bioefficacy achievable with the current inhalation systems are typically in the region of 10% of that experienced with subcutaneously administered insulin. Most of the losses are in the device, mouth and throat, with approximately 30-50% of the insulin deposited in the lungs being absorbed. Clinical experience to date indicates that inhaled insulin has the potential to be an effective treatment in patients with diabetes, and that it may have particular utility in the treatment of postprandial hyperglycaemia.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin aspart

Insulin aspart is a novel rapid-acting insulin analogue with improved subcutaneous absorption properties when compared with soluble human insulin. Pharmacokinetic studies show an absorption profile with a time to reach peak concentration (t(max)) about half that of human insulin, a peak plasma drug concentration (Cmax) approximately twice as high and shorter residence time. The potency and bioavailability of insulin aspart are similar to those of human insulin. The pharmacokinetics of insulin aspart have been studied in healthy Caucasian and Asian-Japanese volunteers, in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus, and in children with diabetes, with both pre- and postprandial administration and during continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). The pharmacokinetic profile was similar to that of another rapid-acting insulin analogue, insulin lispro, on the basis of published information for that agent. Pharmacodynamic studies show a smaller excursion of postprandial glucose with insulin aspart injected subcutaneously just before the meal compared with soluble human insulin injected 30 minutes before the meal in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, and an equivalent control in patients with type 2 diabetes displaying residual insulin production. In a treatment study, glucose excursions evaluated from 24-hour glucose profiles showed less variability with insulin aspart compared with human insulin. Adverse events, including hypoglycaemia-induced ventricular repolarisation and hypoglycaemic threshold and awareness, did not differ between insulin aspart and human insulin. The available data suggest that subcutaneous injections of insulin aspart just before meals better mimic the endogenous insulin profile in blood compared with human insulin, resulting in improved glucose control in a meal-related insulin regimen. This review summarises the clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin aspart in relation to human insulin and insulin lispro.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of bromfenac.

Bromfenac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug whose peak plasma concentration is reached 0.5 hours after oral administration. Bromfenac binds extensively to plasma albumin. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve is linearly proportional to the dose for oral doses up to 150 mg. The relationship between the total plasma and analgesic effect has been established. Only small amounts of bromfenac are eliminated unchanged, with the remaining drug being biotransformed into glucuronide metabolites which are excreted in urine and bile. Rapid elimination occurs in healthy individuals (half-life 0.5 to 4.0 h). Renal disease, hepatic disease and aging alter the disposition kinetics of bromfenac, and dosage adjustment may be advisable. Bromfenac modestly decreases free phenytoin concentrations. Bromfenac can cause idiosyncratic hepatic toxicity and has been withdrawn by its manufacturer pending further investigation of these case reports.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics and selective pharmacodynamics of new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors: an update

The angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are widely used in the management of essential hypertension, stable chronic heart failure, myocardial infarction (MI) and diabetic nephropathy. There is an increasing number of new agents to add to the nine ACE inhibitors (benazepril, cilazapril, delapril, fosinopril, lisinopril, pentopril, perindopril, quinapril and ramipril) reviewed in this journal in 1990. The pharmacokinetic properties of five newer ACE inhibitors (trandolapril, moexipril, spirapril, temocapril and imidapril) are reviewed in this update. All of these new agents are characterised by having a carboxyl functional groups and requiring hepatic activation to form pharmacologically active metabolites. They achieve peak plasma concentrations at similar times (t(max)) to those of established agents. Three of these agents (trandolapril, moexipril and imidapril) require dosage reductions in patients with renal impairment. Dosage reductions of moexipril and temocapril are recommended for elderly patients, and dosages of moexipril should be lower in patients who are hepatically impaired. Moexipril should be taken 1 hour before meals, whereas other ACE inhibitors can be taken without regard to meals. The pharmacokinetics of warfarin are not altered by concomitant administration with trandolapril or moexipril. Although imidapril and spirapril have no effect on digoxin pharmacokinetics, the area under the concentration-time curve of imidapril and the peak plasma concentration of the active metabolite imidaprilat are decreased when imidapril is given together with digoxin. Although six ACE inhibitors (captopril, enalapril, fosinopril, lisinopril, quinapril and ramipril) have been approved for use in heart failure by the US Food and Drug Administration, an overview of 32 clinical trials of ACE inhibitors in heart failure showed that no significant heterogeneity in mortality was found among enalapril, ramipril, quinapril, captopril, lisinopril, benazepril, perindopril and cilazapril. Initiation of therapy with captopril, ramipril, and trandolapril at least 3 days after an acute MI resulted in all-cause mortality risk reductions of 18 to 27%. Captopril has been shown to have similar morbidity and mortality benefits to those of diuretics and beta-blockers in hypertensive patients. Captopril has been shown to delay the progression of diabetic nephropathy, and enalapril and lisinopril prevent the development of nephropathy in normoalbuminuric patients with diabetes. ACE inhibitors are generally characterised by flat dose-response curves. Lisinopril is the only ACE inhibitor that exhibits a linear dose-response curve. Despite the fact that most ACE inhibitors are recommended for once-daily administration, only fosinopril, ramipril, and trandolapril have trough-to-peak effect ratios in excess of 50%.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin glulisine

Insulin glulisine injection [3(B)-Lys, 29(B)-Glu-human insulin] is the newest human insulin analogue product for the control of mealtime blood sugar. As with insulin aspart and insulin lispro products, the insulin glulisine product displays faster absorption and onset of action, with a shorter duration of action than that of regular human insulin.The modifications of the amino acid sequence at positions 3 and 29 in the B chain of human insulin simultaneously provide stability to the molecular structure and render the insulin glulisine molecule less likely to self-associate, compared with human insulin, while still allowing the formation of dimers at pharmaceutical concentrations. Unlike other insulin analogue products, this allows for a viable drug product in the absence of hexamer-promoting zinc and, thus, provides immediate availability of insulin glulisine molecules at the injection site for absorption.Pharmacokinetic studies with insulin glulisine have shown an absorption profile with a peak insulin concentration approximately twice that of regular human insulin, which is reached in approximately half the time. Dose proportionality in early, maximum and total exposure is observed for insulin glulisine over the therapeutic relevant dose range up to 0.4 U/kg.The pharmacodynamic profile of insulin glulisine reflects the absorption kinetics by demonstrating a greater rate of glucose utilization, which is completed earlier and at equipotency on a molar base compared with regular human insulin. Dose-proportionality in glucose utilization has been established for insulin glulisine in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus in the dose range of 0.075-0.15 U/kg, and a less than dose-proportional increase above 0.15 U/kg, indicating saturation of insulin action in general.The rapid absorption and action of insulin glulisine show similar low intrasubject variability compared with insulin lispro and regular human insulin when given repeatedly, and have been confirmed in healthy subjects of different body mass indices (BMIs) and ethnic groups, as well as adults and children with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, the early insulin exposure and action of insulin glulisine were slightly -- but consistently -- greater than those of insulin lispro in healthy volunteers across a wide range of BMIs.Meal studies in patients with type 1 diabetes show that insulin glulisine provides better postprandial blood glucose control than regular human insulin when administered immediately pre-meal, and equivalent control when given after the meal. In a study in patients with type 2 diabetes, the overall postprandial blood glucose excursions were lower with insulin glulisine than with insulin lispro. Therefore, by virtue of its primary structure, insulin glulisine demonstrates both low self-association in solution and stability for a viable insulin product in the absence of zinc, thereby maintaining immediate availability for absorption after subcutaneous injection. This confers the most rapid onset of glucose-lowering activity and adds to the flexibility in postprandial blood glucose control.     

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Relationship between pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics

The inter-relationship between the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic behaviour of ACE inhibitors is reviewed. First, some of the methods which have been used to assess the pharmacodynamics of ACE inhibitors in humans are presented. They include humoral assays (e.g. ACE activity in plasma, renin activity, etc.), haemodynamic changes (blood pressure, total peripheral resistance, etc.) and agonist challenges (angiotensin I infusions). Subsequently a pharmacokinetic-dynamic model is described, based on biochemical processes obtained after ACE inhibition, which seems to be useful for the interpretation of the complex processes. The various correlations between plasma drug concentration on the one hand and plasma ACE activity, angiotensin II concentration in plasma or blood pressure on the other, are discussed on the basis of this model. From the model obtained it becomes obvious that under many circumstances the release of the inhibitor from ACE binding is the step which in fact determines the pharmacodynamically relevant elimination rate of the drug at low concentrations, whereas at high concentrations the elimination of the drug is mainly dependent on kidney (and/or liver) elimination rate. The dynamic-kinetic correlations are then presented for some ACE inhibitors in various disease states: arterial hypertension, heart failure, old age, renal failure, liver disease. In a final section the kinetic and dynamic relevance of interactions of ACE inhibitors with food and other drugs is described (e.g. prostaglandin inhibitors, diuretics, digoxin and cimetidine). Despite the great body of literature which deals with the kinetic and/or dynamic properties of ACE inhibitors, precise knowledge of the relationship between their kinetic and dynamic behaviour is rather limited and there is a clear need for further studies to elucidate this complex topic, thereby improving therapeutic possibilities with these useful new compounds.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of allopurinol and oxypurinol

Allopurinol is the drug most widely used to lower the blood concentrations of urate and, therefore, to decrease the number of repeated attacks of gout. Allopurinol is rapidly and extensively metabolised to oxypurinol (oxipurinol), and the hypouricaemic efficacy of allopurinol is due very largely to this metabolite.The pharmacokinetic parameters of allopurinol after oral dosage include oral bioavailability of 79 +/- 20% (mean +/- SD), an elimination half-life (t((1/2))) of 1.2 +/- 0.3 hours, apparent oral clearance (CL/F) of 15.8 +/- 5.2 mL/min/kg and an apparent volume of distribution after oral administration (V(d)/F) of 1.31 +/- 0.41 L/kg. Assuming that 90 mg of oxypurinol is formed from every 100mg of allopurinol, the pharmacokinetic parameters of oxypurinol in subjects with normal renal function are a t((1/2)) of 23.3 +/- 6.0 hours, CL/F of 0.31 +/- 0.07 mL/min/kg, V(d)/F of 0.59 +/- 0.16 L/kg, and renal clearance (CL(R)) relative to creatinine clearance of 0.19 +/- 0.06. Oxypurinol is cleared almost entirely by urinary excretion and, for many years, it has been recommended that the dosage of allopurinol should be reduced in renal impairment. A reduced initial target dosage in renal impairment is still reasonable, but recent data on the toxicity of allopurinol indicate that the dosage may be increased above the present guidelines if the reduction in plasma urate concentrations is inadequate. Measurement of plasma concentrations of oxypurinol in selected patients, particularly those with renal impairment, may help to decrease the risk of toxicity and improve the hypouricaemic response. Monitoring of plasma concentrations of oxypurinol should also help to identify patients with poor adherence. Uricosuric drugs, such as probenecid, have potentially opposing effects on the hypouricaemic efficacy of allopurinol. Their uricosuric effect lowers the plasma concentrations of urate; however, they increase the CL(R) of oxypurinol, thus potentially decreasing the influence of allopurinol. The net effect is an increased degree of hypouricaemia, but the interaction is probably limited to patients with normal renal function or only moderate impairment.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin lispro mixtures

Rapid-acting insulin analogues such as insulin lispro and insulin aspart produce a more physiological profile of insulin activity than does conventional regular human insulin because of their unique pharmacokinetics. These insulin analogues are absorbed rapidly from the subcutaneous injection site, resulting in a better matching of the appearance of insulin in the circulation with nutrient absorption from the intestine. In addition, they are shorter-acting than regular human insulin, thus decreasing the risk of late postprandial hypoglycaemia due to inappropriate hyperinsulinaemia. Because self-prepared mixtures of these rapid-acting insulin analogues with longer-acting insulins such as neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin have been shown to be clinically useful, and because manufactured fixed-ratio mixtures of regular human insulin and NPH already represent a large proportion of insulin use, manufactured fixed-ratio mixtures of insulin lispro and a sustained-release insulin known as NPL have been developed (insulin lispro mixtures). NPL is a protamine-based insulin lispro formulation with pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics comparable to those of human NPH insulin. NPL was developed for use within insulin lispro mixtures because an exchange between soluble insulin lispro and protamine-bound human insulin within human NPH precludes prolonged storage of mixtures of these insulins. An insulin lispro mixture consisting of 25% insulin lispro and 75% NPL is now commercially available. This preparation is intended primarily as an alternative to human insulin 30/70, which is commonly used within a twice-daily injection regimen. A mixture containing 50% insulin lispro and 50% NPL is also available. The rapid activity of insulin lispro is maintained within insulin lispro mixtures, allowing injection just prior to a meal, a convenience that is not available with commercial mixtures of regular human insulin and human NPH insulin, which should be injected 30 to 45 minutes prior to meals. As with insulin lispro itself, the rapid action of insulin lispro within the insulin lispro mixtures also results in a smaller increase in blood glucose levels after meals than with comparable human insulin mixtures. In addition, data from two studies have shown that when Mix25 is injected prior to the evening meal the incidence of nocturnal hypoglycaemia is decreased in comparison with the same dose of human insulin 30/70. The combined rapid and prolonged insulin activity provided by insulin lispro mixtures has been defined both in healthy subjects without diabetes and in patients with diabetes.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ifosfamide and its metabolites

This review discusses several issues in the clinical pharmacology of the antitumour agent ifosfamide and its metabolites. Ifosfamide is effective in a large number of malignant diseases. Its use, however, can be accompanied by haematological toxicity, neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity. Since its development in the middle of the 1960s, most of the extensive metabolism of ifosfamide has been elucidated. Identification of specific isoenzymes responsible for ifosfamide metabolism may lead to an improved efficacy/toxicity ratio by modulation of the metabolic pathways. Whether ifosfamide is specifically transported by erythrocytes and which activated ifosfamide metabolites play a key role in this transport is currently being debated. In most clinical pharmacokinetic studies, the phenomenon of autoinduction has been observed, but the mechanism is not completely understood. Assessment of the pharmacokinetics of ifosfamide and metabolites has long been impaired by the lack of reliable bioanalytical assays. The recent development of improved bioanalytical assays has changed this dramatically, allowing extensive pharmacokinetic assessment, identifying key issues such as population differences in pharmacokinetic parameters, differences in elimination dependent upon route and schedule of administration, implications of the chirality of the drug and interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. The mechanisms of action of cytotoxicity, neurotoxicity, urotoxicity and nephrotoxicity have been pivotal issues in the assessment of the pharmacodynamics of ifosfamide. Correlations between the new insights into ifosfamide metabolism, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics will rationalise the further development of therapeutic drug monitoring and dose individualisation of ifosfamide treatment.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of fazadinium in renal failure

Summary The pharmacokinetic behaviour and neuromuscular blockade produced by the administration of fazadinium bromide at a dose of 1 mg/kg have been studied in seven patients with end-stage renal failure. No significant differences were found in the pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic properties when compared with patients with normal renal function. It is suggested that fazadinium may be superior to either d-tubocurarine or pancuronium in providing muscle relaxation for patients with renal failure.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glyceryl trinitrate and its metabolites

This review discusses the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glyceryl trinitrate (nitroglycerin; GTN) pertinent to clinical medicine. The pharmacokinetics of GTN associated with various dose regimens are characterised by prominent intra- and inter-individual variability. It is, nevertheless, important to clearly understand the pharmacokinetics and characteristics of GTN to optimise its use in clinical practice and, in particular, to obviate the development of tolerance. Measurements of plasma concentrations of GTN and of 1,2-glyceryl dinitrate (1,2-GDN), 1,3-glyceryl dinitrate (1,3-GDN), 1-glyceryl mononitrate (1-GMN), and 2-glyceryl mononitrate (2-GMN), its four main metabolites, remain difficult and require meticulous techniques to obtain reliable results. Since GDNs have an effect on haemodynamic function, pharmacokinetic analyses that include the parent drug as well as the metabolites are important. Although the precise mechanisms of GTN metabolism have not been elucidated, two main pathways have been proposed for its biotransformation. The first is a mechanism-based biotransformation pathway that produces nitric oxide (NO) and contributes directly to vasodilation. The second is a clearance-based biotransformation or detoxification pathway that produces inorganic nitrite anions (NO(2) -). NO(2) - has no apparent cardiovascular effect and is not converted to NO in pharmacologically relevant concentrations in vivo. In addition, several non-enzymatic and enzymatic systems are capable of metabolising GTN. This complex metabolism complicates considerably the evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of GTN. Regardless of the route of administration, concentrations of the metabolites exceed those of the parent compound by several orders of magnitude. During continuous steady-state delivery of GTN, for instance by a patch, concentrations of 1,2-GDN are consistently 2-7 times higher than those of 1,3-GDN, and concentrations of 2-GMN are 4-8 times higher than those of 1-GMN. Concentrations of GDNs are approximately 10 times higher, and of GMNs approximately 100 times higher, than those of GTN during sustained administration. The development of tolerance is closely related to the metabolism of GTN, and can be broadly categorised as haemodynamic tolerance versus vascular tolerance. Efforts are warranted to circumvent the development of tolerance and facilitate the use of GTN in clinical practice. Although this remains to be accomplished, it is likely that, in the near future, regimens will be developed based on a full understanding of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of GTN and its metabolites.     

抗菌药物的药动学及药效学相关研究的临床意义

通过对抗菌药物的药动学(PK)、药效学(PD)的相关研究，发现了抗菌药物不同的PK/PD特性；提出了预测抗菌药物疗效的重要PD参数为AUC0-24/MIC，Cmax/MIC，t＞MIC和抗生素后效应(PAE)等；而且对评价药物有效性。指导合理用药，提高药物疗效，避免产生耐药性都有指导性的作用。因此，PK/PD研究是抗菌药合理应用的基础，在研究、设计和制定抗菌药物治疗方案、制定敏感性临界值以及推荐用药指南等方面都具有重要价值。     

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation

The aim of this review is to analyse critically the recent literature on the clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in solid organ transplant recipients.Dosage and target concentration recommendations for tacrolimus vary from centre to centre, and large pharmacokinetic variability makes it difficult to predict what concentration will be achieved with a particular dose or dosage change. Therapeutic ranges have not been based on statistical approaches. The majority of pharmacokinetic studies have involved intense blood sampling in small homogeneous groups in the immediate post-transplant period. Most have used nonspecific immunoassays and provide little information on pharmacokinetic variability. Demographic investigations seeking correlations between pharmacokinetic parameters and patient factors have generally looked at one covariate at a time and have involved small patient numbers. Factors reported to influence the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus include the patient group studied, hepatic dysfunction, hepatitis C status, time after transplantation, patient age, donor liver characteristics, recipient race, haematocrit and albumin concentrations, diurnal rhythm, food administration, corticosteroid dosage, diarrhoea and cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzyme and P-glycoprotein expression. Population analyses are adding to our understanding of the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus, but such investigations are still in their infancy. A significant proportion of model variability remains unexplained. Population modelling and Bayesian forecasting may be improved if CYP isoenzymes and/or P-glycoprotein expression could be considered as covariates.Reports have been conflicting as to whether low tacrolimus trough concentrations are related to rejection. Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between high trough concentrations and toxicity, particularly nephrotoxicity. The best predictor of pharmacological effect may be drug concentrations in the transplanted organ itself. Researchers have started to question current reliance on trough measurement during therapeutic drug monitoring, with instances of toxicity and rejection occurring when trough concentrations are within 'acceptable' ranges. The correlation between blood concentration and drug exposure can be improved by use of non-trough timepoints. However, controversy exists as to whether this will provide any great benefit, given the added complexity in monitoring. Investigators are now attempting to quantify the pharmacological effects of tacrolimus on immune cells through assays that measure in vivo calcineurin inhibition and markers of immunosuppression such as cytokine concentration. To date, no studies have correlated pharmacodynamic marker assay results with immunosuppressive efficacy, as determined by allograft outcome, or investigated the relationship between calcineurin inhibition and drug adverse effects. Little is known about the magnitude of the pharmacodynamic variability of tacrolimus.