A temporary self-expanding metallic stent for malignant colorectal obstruction

AIM:To investigate the clinical safety and efficacy of a temporary self-expanding metallic stent(SEMS) for malignant colorectal obstruction.METHODS:From September 2007 to June 2012,33 patients with malignant colorectal obstruction were treated with a temporary SEMS.The stent had a tubular configuration with a retrieval lasso attached inside the proximal end of the stent to facilitate its removal.The SEMS was removed one week after placement.Clinical examination,abdominal X-ray and a contrast study were prospectively performed and both initial and follow-up data before and at 1 d,1 wk,and 1 mo,3 mo,6 mo and 12 mo after stent placement were obtained.Data collected on the technical and clinical success of the procedures,complications,need for reinsertion and survival were analyzed.RESULTS:Stent placement and removal were technically successful in all patients with no procedurerelated complications.Post-procedural complications included stent migration(n = 2) and anal pain(n = 2).Clinical success was achieved in 31(93.9%) of 33 patients with resolution of bowel obstruction within 3 d of stent removal.Eleven of the 33 patients died 73.81 ± 23.66 d(range 42-121 d) after removal of the stent without colonic re-obstruction.Clinical success was achieved in another 8 patients without symptoms of obstruction during the follow-up period.Reinsertion of the stent was performed in the remaining 12 patients with re-obstruction after 84.33 ± 51.80 d of follow-up.The mean and median periods of relief of obstructive symptoms were 97.25 ± 9.56 d and 105 ± 17.43 d,respectively,using Kaplan-Meier analysis.CONCLUSION:Temporary SEMS is a safe and effective approach in patients with malignant colorectal obstruction due to low complication rates and good medium-term outcomes.     

Treatment of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction with a nitinol self-expanding metal stent: An international prospective multicentre registry

Background

Duodenal stenting has become a broadly accepted first line of treatment for patients with advanced malignant gastroduodenal obstruction as these patients are difficult to treat and are poor surgical candidates.

Aims

To document duodenal stent performance for palliative management of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction.

Methods

Multicentre, single arm, prospective registry documenting peroral endoscopic duodenal stenting procedures in 202 patients.

Results

Technical success achieved in 98% (CI, 95%, 99%) of stent placements. Increase of Gastric Outlet Obstruction Score by at least 1 point compared to baseline was achieved in 91% (CI, 86%, 95%) of patients persisting for a median of 184 days (CI, 109, 266). By day 5 (CI, 4, 6) after stent placement, 50% of patients experienced a score increase of at least 1 point.Improvement from 14% of patients at baseline tolerating soft solids or low residue/normal diet to 84% at 15 days, 86% at 30 days, 81% at 90 days, 79% at 180 days, and 70% at 270 days. Complications included stent ingrowth and/or overgrowth (12.4%), transient periprocedural symptoms (3%), bleeding (3%), stent migration (1.5%), and perforation (0.5%).

Conclusions

Safety and effectiveness of duodenal stenting for palliation of malignant gastroduodenal obstruction was confirmed in the largest international prospective series to date.     

Management of acute malignant large-bowel obstruction with self-expanding metal stent

Purpose  

Colorectal stents are being used for palliation and as a “bridge to surgery” in obstructing colorectal carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) as the initial interventional approach in the management of acute malignant large-bowel obstruction.     

Treatment of malignant esophageal obstruction with silicone-coated metallic self-expanding stents.

Six patients with high-grade malignant esophageal obstruction were treated with silicone-coated metallic self-expanding esophageal stents (Z stents). Endoscopic placement of stents was well tolerated. All patients achieved excellent palliation, defined by a decrease of at least two dysphagia grades, which was sustained. Complications occurred during follow-up in four patients and included stent migration, silicone disruption with tumor ingrowth, food impaction, and perforation (discovered at autopsy) at the distal stent site. Three of the four complications were promptly treated by endoscopic or radiologic intervention. Recent modification in stent design and placement technique will hopefully reduce complications. The self-expanding stent has several theoretical advantages over the rigid plastic stent and Nd:YAG laser for palliation of obstructing esophageal malignancy.     

New antireflux plastic stent for patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND Endoscopic biliary stenting is a well-established palliative treatment for patients with unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction(MBO). However, the main problem with stent placement is the relatively short duration of stent patency.Although self-expanding metal stents(SEMSs) have a longer patency period than plastic stents(PSs), the higher costs limit the wide use of SEMSs. A PS with an antireflux valve is an attractive idea to prolong stent patency, but no ideal design for an antireflux PS(ARPS) has been proposed. We developed a new ARPS with a "duckbilled" valve attached to the duodenal end of the stent.AIM To compare the patency of ARPSs with that of traditional PSs(TPSs) in patients with unresectable distal MBO.METHODS We conducted a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study. This study was conducted at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Consecutive patients with extrahepatic MBO were enrolled prospectively. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either an ARPS or a TPS. Patients were followed by clinic visits or telephone interviews every 1-2 mo until stent exchange, death, or the final study follow-up in October 2018. The primary outcome was the duration of stent patency. Secondary outcomes included the rate of technical success, the rate of clinical success,adverse events, and patient survival.RESULTS Between February 2016 and December 2017, 38 patients were randomly assigned to two groups, with 19 patients in each group, to receive ARPSs or TPSs. Stent insertion was technically successful in all patients. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the rates of clinical success or the rates of early or late adverse events(P = 0.660, 1.000, and 1.000, respectively). The median duration of stent patency in the ARPS group was 285 d [interquartile range(IQR),170], which was significantly longer than that in the TPS group(median, 130 d;IQR, 90, P = 0.005). No significant difference in patient survival was noted between the two groups(P = 0.900).CONCLUSION The new ARPS is safe and effective for the palliation of unresectable distal MBO,and has a significantly longer stent patency than a TPS.     

Clinical outcomes of secondary stent-in-stent self-expanding metal stent placement for primary stent malfunction in malignant gastric outlet obstruction

Background

Although a substantial number of patients require secondary stents insertion due to primary stent malfunction in malignant gastric outlet obstruction, data on the outcomes of secondary self-expanding metal stents are sparse.

Aim

To investigate clinical outcomes and factors related with secondary stent malfunction in patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction given secondary stent-in-stent self-expanding metal stent insertion.

Methods

For this retrospective study, a total 77 patients who underwent secondary stent-in-stent self-expanding metal stent placement for primary stent malfunction in malignant gastric outlet obstruction were enrolled. We compared the effectiveness and complications of secondary covered and uncovered stents and explored the predictive factors for stent malfunction.

Results

Stent-in-stent self-expanding metal stent placements were technically successful in all patients. Both groups also had comparable clinical success rates (covered stent, 87.2% and uncovered stent, 90.0%, P = 1.000). Stent malfunction rates (31.9% and 36.7% respectively, P = 0.805) and median patency time of stent (165 [95% confidence interval: 112–218] and 165 [95% confidence interval: 126–204] days, respectively, P = 0.358) were similar between secondary covered and uncovered stents. Longer patients’ survival time (≥100 days) was associated with increased risk of stent malfunction (odds ratio: 4.598; 95% confidence interval: 1.473–14.355; P = 0.009).

Conclusions

Secondary stent-in-stent self-expanding metal stent placement is feasible and effective treatment for primary stent malfunctions in malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Covered and uncovered stent are equally acceptable in terms of stent-related complications and stent patency, regardless of primary stent type.     

Evaluation of new plastic stents for malignant biliary obstruction

Background: A new plastic stent was designed for endoscopic biliary stenting to achieve a long and effective drainage period. Method: The Double layer stent is composed of Teflon as the inner layer and nylon as the outer layer divided with metallic mesh. This structure gives the stent several side‐flaps without side‐holes. Double layer stents were applied in 24 patients with inoperable malignant biliary obstruction. Results: The Double layer stents were successfully placed in all cases, and the effective drainage rate of these stents was 96%. The mean patency period evaluated by the Kaplan–Meier method without ineffective cases was 207 days, which was longer than the ordinary plastic stent of the same diameter. Concerning the complications related to inserting, we experienced dislocation was experienced in three patients. Conclusions: The authors regard this new device as an useful stent, which users can expect long patency period, easy exchange management, and reduced cost for the patients with inoperable obstruction in the biliary tract.     

Successful sealing of benign esophageal leaks after temporary placement of a self-expanding plastic stent without fluoroscopic guidance

INTRODUCTION: We report on our experience with the temporary use of a self-expanding plastic stent (SEPS) in the treatment of non-malignant esophageal leaks. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between November 2001 and May 2005 ten patients with iatrogenic esophageal perforations (n = 4), post-surgical leaks (n = 5) and esophago-mediastinal fistulas after caustic injury (n = 1) were treated by temporary SEPS placement. In eight out of ten patients SEPS placement was done without fluoroscopy due to the emergency setting. Stent removal was performed with a rat-toothed forceps. RESULTS: Leaks were located in the proximal (n = 1), middle (n = 6) and distal (n = 3) parts of the esophagus. The mean leakage size was 2 cm. Stent placement without fluoroscopy was always successful. The median duration of stent therapy was 55.5 days (range 15,438). In 7/10 cases the SEPS was readily removed, showing complete healing of the former leak. Four patients died during the follow-up. However, their deaths were not related to the stent therapy. DISCUSSION: The temporary use of the SEPS represents a safe method for sealing benign esophageal leaks. In the emergency-setting SEPS placement without fluoroscopy is feasible and the stent can be easily removed. In contained perforations without severe mediastinitis of the mid esophagus the SEPS should be discussed as a gentle first-line therapy.     

Palliative treatment of malignant esophageal stenosis: the role of self-expanding stent endoscopic implantation

Endoscopic tube implantations were carried out in 40 patients with malignant stenosis of the esophagus and gastric cardia using self-expanding metallic stents. The indications for endoscopic intubation were the advanced stage of the tumor in 27 cases and risk factors that made resection inadvisable in 13 cases. In three patients, it proved impossible to implant a stent endoscopically because we were not able to pass the guide wire through the stenosis, whereas correct stent placement was achieved in 37 cases. Functional results were good in 33 patients, but four patients did not show any improvement of symptoms. Complications occurred in nine patients (24.3%): two bleedings, three neoplastic obstructions, one food obstruction, and three distal dislodgements of the prosthesis were observed, but could be readily corrected. No deaths occurred. The median survival time was 151 days (range 25-545 days). This study suggests that endoscopic placement of metallic self-expanding stents is safe and is to be preferred to plastic stents for easier implantation and lower morbidity.     

Double layered self-expanding metal stents for malignant esophageal obstruction, especially across the gastroesophageal junction

AIM: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of double-layered self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) for treatment of malignant esophageal obstruction according to whether SEMS crosses the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ).METHODS: Forty eight patients who underwent the SEMS insertion for malignant esophageal obstruction were enrolled. Patients were classified as GEJ group (SEMS across GEJ, 18 patients) and non-GEJ group (SEMS above GEJ, 30 patients) according to SEMS position. Double layered (outer uncovered and inner covered stent) esophageal stents were placed.RESULTS: The SEMS insertion and the clinical improvement were achieved in all patients in both groups. Stent malfunction occurred in seven patients in the GEJ group and nine patients in the non-GEJ group. Tumor overgrowth occurred in five and eight patients, respectively, food impaction occurred in one patient in each group, and stent migration occurred in one and no patient, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups. Reflux esophagitis occurred more frequently in the GEJ group (eight vs five patients, P = 0.036) and was controlled by proton pump inhibitor. Aspiration pneumonia occurred in zero and five patients, respectively, and tracheoesophageal fistula occurred in zero and two patients, respectively.CONCLUSION: Double-layered SEMS are a feasible and effective treatment when placed across the GEJ for malignant esophageal obstruction. Double-layered SEMS provide acceptable complications, especially migration, although reflux esophagitis is more common in the GEJ group.     

Clinical application of self-expanding metallic stent in the management of acute left-sided colorectal malignant obstruction

AIM: To summarize our experience with the application of self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) in the management of acute left-sided colorectal malignant obstruction. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing placement of SEMS between April 2000 and January 2004 was performed. RESULTS: Insertion of SEMS was attempted in 26 patients under fluoroscopic guidance with occasional endoscopic assistance. The sites of lesions were located in splenic flexure of two patients, left colon of seven patients, sigmoid colon of eight patients and rectum of nine patients. The intended uses of SEMS were for palliation in 7 patients and as a bridge to elective surgery in 19 patients. In the latter group, placement of SEMS allowed for preoperative systemic and bowel preparation and the following one-stage anastomosis. Successful stent placement was achieved in 22 (85%) of the 26 patients. The clinical bowel obstruction resolved 24 hours after successful stent placement in 21 (95%) patients. Three SEMS-related minor complications occurred, two stents migrated and one caused anal pain. CONCLUSION: SEMS represents an effective and safe tool in the management of acute malignant colorectal obstruction. As a bridge to surgery, SEMS can provide time for systematic support and bowel preparation and obviate the need for fecal diversion or on-table lavage. As a palliative measure, SEMS can eliminate the need for emergent colostomy.     

防反流型金属自膨式食管支架的临床应用

目的证实一种新型食管支架具有治疗狭窄并有抗胃食管反流作用。方法１７例（男１６例，女１例）有梗阻症状的食管、贲门恶性肿瘤患者。安装防反流型支架后分别观察症状及体征，并监测２４小时食管ｐＨ（８例）、食管内镜检查（９例）及胃肠Ｘ线检查（３例），以观察狭窄通畅情况及有无胃食管反流迹象。结果置入支架后食管、胃、贲门通畅，无一例有胃食管反流存在。结论此类新型支架有良好的抗胃食管反流作用。