Evidence that AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia does not require participation of the entire AV node

Electrophysiologic studies in a case of AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia showed that a programmed atrial premature depolarization induced during the tachycardia did not change the tachycardia cycle but caused a delay in the following atrial echo. Analysis of such a phenomenon suggests that the atrial premature depolarization was conducted to the upper part of the AV node but not to the site of the re-entry. Therefore, AV nodal re-entry can persist without the participation of the upper part of the AV node. This case illustrates that the upper common pathway connecting the dual AV nodal pathways cranially is most likely located within the AV node and consists of AV nodal tissue.     

Evidence that AV Nodal Re-Entrant Tachycardia Does Not Require Participation of the Entire AV Node

Electrophysiologic studies in a case of A V nodal re-entrant tachyca rdia showed thai a programmed alrial premature depolarization induced during the tachycardia did not change the tachycardia cycle but caused a delay in the following atrial echo. Analysis of such a phenomenon suggests that the atrial premature depolarization was conducted to the upper part of the AV node but not to the site of the re-entry. Therefore, AV nodal re-entry can persist without the participation of the upper part of the AV node. This case illustrates that the upper common pathway connecting the dual AV nodal pathways cranially is most likely located within the AV node and consists of A V nodal tissue.     

Narrow QRS complex tachycardias

Narrow QRS complex tachycardias are either atrioventricular (AV) nodal passive or AV nodal active. AV nodal passive tachycardias do not require the participation of the AV node in maintenance of the tachycardia. Examples are atrial tachycardia, atrial flutter, and atrial fibrillation. Treatment is directed at ventricular rate control with calcium channel blockers or beta-blockers. AV nodal active tachycardias require active participation of the AV node in maintaining the tachycardia. Examples include AV nodal reentry tachycardia and circus movement tachycardia using an accessory pathway. Treatment with a vagal maneuver or adenosine usually terminates the tachycardia. Recognition of these tachycardias is reviewed.     

The Response of Regular Re-entrant Supraventricular Tachycardia to Right Heart Stimulation

The study was designed to assess the effect of various forms of right atrial or ventricular stimulation on the termination of re-entrant "supraventricular" tachycardias. Standard electrophysiological techniques were used in 81 patients to study 86 stable tachycardias. All tachycardias were initiated by single or double atrial or ventricular premature stimuli or incremental atrial pacing. Eight groups of tachycardia circuit were defined in terms of the anterograde and retrograde pathways. Termination of each tachycardia was studied by atrial underdrive, ventricular underdrive, rapid atrial stimulation and single or double atrial and ventricular premature extrastimuli. Intranodal re-entrant tachycardias formed 33% of the total and WPW tachycardias as a whole formed 55% of the total number of arrhythmias. The remainder were comprised of atrial tachycardia (5%), tachycardias in association with a partial AV nodal bypass (3%) and pre-excited tachycardias (5%). A single atrial extrastimulus was most effective where the circuit involved the right atrium. Atrial underdrive was consistently less successful than a single atrial extrastimulus in all groups. Rapid atrial pacing was effective in all groups, but caused transient atrial flutter or fibrillation in a proportion of each group except one. Ventricular underdrive stimulation was most effective in those groups where the right ventricle was involved in the circuit, but tended to be less effective than programmed single or double ventricular extrastimuli. Pacemakers designed to deliver appropriately timed single or double extrastimuli may offer an important alternative to other pacing modalities.     

Extended Protocol for Demonstration of Dual AV Nodal Physiology

The incidence of dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal physiology was evaluated in 22 patients (14 males, 8 females, age 52 ± 18 years) undergoing electrophysiology studies for evaluation of ventricular tachycardia/honsustained ventricular tachycardia (n = 11), supraventricular tachycardia (n = 5), and syncope (n = 6). Patients with AV node reentrant tachycardia were excluded. Thirteen patients had riormal left ventricular function and nine patients (seven with coronary artery disease, two with dilated cardiomyopathy) had depressed left ventricular function. Single atrial extrastimuli (A2) were introduced after eight-beat drives at paced cycle lengths of 550 msec and 400 or 450 msec beginning at coupling intervals of 650 and 500 or 550 msec, respectively. The coupling interval was decreased at 10-msec intervals until AV node or atrial refractoriness. A second atrial extrastimulus (A3) was then added. A2 was fixed at 50 msec greater than the atrial or AV nodal refractory period. A3 was coupled to A2 at 650 and 500 or 550 msec and decremented as with single extrastimulation. Dual AV nodal physiology was defined by a 50-msec increase in A2H2 or A3H3 with a 10-msec decrement in the coupling interval or a discontinuous H1H2 versus A1A2 or H2H3 versus A2A3 curve. Using a single extrastimulus, 1 of 22 patients demonstrated dual AV nodal physiology. Using double extrastimuli, an additional four patients with dual AV nodal physiology were identified. The occurrence of dual AV nodal physiology determined using double extrastimuli is increased compared to using only a single extrastimulus (P = 0.03). In conclusion, dual AV nodal physiology can be demonstrated with greater frequency using an extended rather than a standard protocol.     

Atypical AV nodal reentry with bystander accessory pathway: an unusual mechanism of preexcited tachycardia

We present an unusual mechanism of preexcited tachycardia--atypical AV nodal reentry with bystander AP. It can be differentiated from other preexcited tachycardias by its variable degree of preexcitation (either spontaneous or in response to atrial pacing), higher degree of preexcitation with pacing near the origin of the AP than during tachycardia, inability to preexcite the tachycardia by either late atrial or ventricular premature beats, the presence of nonpreexcited atypical AV nodal reentry tachycardia following successful AP ablation, and by exclusion of atrial tachycardia.     

Simultaneous AV Nodal Reentrant and Ventricular Tachycardias

Simultaneous AV nodal reentrant and ventricular tachycardias were observed during the course of an electrophysiological study in a 51-year-old patient who suffered from recurrent attacks of sustained ventricular tachycardia. Occurrence of simultaneous tachycardias was facilitated by the fact that both tachycardias had a similar cycle length. Ventricular tachycardia was most probably initiated by AV nodal tachycardia previously induced by atrial extrastimulation following the administration of atropine.     

Inappropriate detection of supraventricular arrhythmias by implantable dual chamber defibrillators: a comparison of four different algorithms

Inappropriate therapy of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias by an ICD is still a common problem. Dual chamber (DDD) ICDs provide additional atrial sensing and should result in higher specificity for detection of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, a direct comparison of different dual chamber algorithms has not been reported. The detection algorithms of four different DDD ICDs were tested: Phylax AV, Defender IV, Ventak AV III DR, and Gem DR 7271. Based on arrhythmias recorded from patients undergoing invasive electrophysiological studies and in many cases of catheter ablation at our institution, a library consisting of 71 supraventricular and 15 ventricular tachyarrhythmias was created. The library consists of episodes of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter with different AV conduction, typical and atypical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, AV reentrant tachycardia, sinus tachycardia, and ventricular tachycardia with and without ventriculoatrial conduction. Atrial fibrillation was appropriately classified by all four algorithms. However, the specificity for detection of other supraventricular tachyarrhythmias achieved by the Biotronik (12%) and the Guidant (11%) devices was significantly lower compared to the specificity of the ELA (28%) and the Medtronic DDD ICD (20%). This is due to the fact that the Biotronik and the Guidant algorithm classified all supraventricular tachyarrhythmias resulting in a stable ventricular rate as ventricular tachycardia, whereas the ELA and Medtronic algorithms performed a more detailed analysis by assessment of PR association, atrial onset, or timing of the atrial event relative to the ventricular event, respectively. Atrial fibrillation, the most common supraventricular tachyarrhythmia in patients with ICD, was detected by all devices.     

Neurohumoral and Hemodynamic Mechanisms of Diuresis During Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Thirty-two consecutive patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias, with previously defined mechanisms of the tachycardias, were interviewed by noninvestigators about whether they experienced symptoms of diuresis during or at the termination of the tachycardias, to test the hypothesis that patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia would have a feeling of diuresis, polyuria, or both during or at the termination of the tachycardia. Twelve of the 13 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (92%), two of the 15 patients with AV reentrant tachycardia (13%), and one of the 4 patients with atrial flutter associated with 2:1 AV conduction (25%) felt diuresis during or at the termination of the tachycardias (AV nodal reentrant tachycardia vs other forms of tachycardia; P < 0.001). In 14 of the 32 patients, the right atrial pressure and plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) concentration were measured during both the tachycardias and sinus rhythm. The mean right atrial pressure during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was significantly elevated compared to that during other forms of tachycardia (P < 0.01). The plasma ANP concentration during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was also elevated significantly compared to that during other forms of tachycardias (P < O.OO1). There were no significant differences in the cycle lengths of the tachycardias, age, left atrial dimensions, or the left ventricular ejection fraction between the AV nodal reentrant tachycardia and the other forms of tachycardia. We concluded that the feeling of diuresis during or at the termination of tachycardia was a more common symptom in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. The higher secretion of plasma ANP from the right atrium might be involved in the mechanism of this symptom.     

Double Ventricular Responses to a Single Atrial Depolarization in a Patient with Dual AV Nodal Pathways

Electrophysiological study was performed in a patient with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Double ventricular responses through dual AV nodal pathways were observed by atrial extrastimulus technique followed by initiation of AVNRT. The difference in conduction time between the slow and fast AV nodal pathways was longer than 320 msec. A ventricular extrastimulus delivered during sinus rhythm, which was not followed by ventriculoatrial conduction, also induced AVNRT. These findings indicated the presence of an antegrade critical delay and retrograde block in the slow AV nodal pathway, criteria necessary for the occurrence of a double ventricular response.     

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and cannon A waves

Regular, narrow complex tachycardia with a ventricular rate around 150 can be challenging. The differential includes sinus tachycardia, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT), and atrial tachycardia (focal or macro re-entrant - i.e. flutter). We present a case of a 90-year-old woman presenting with shortness of breath in which the ECG was not diagnostic, but the presence of regular neck pulsations helped secure the diagnosis of AVNRT. In AVNRT, atria and ventricular contractions occur nearly simultaneously. When the right atrium attempts to contract against a closed tricuspid valve, an abrupt increase in venous pressure is encountered. This increase in venous pressure manifests as prominent neck pulsations termed “cannon A waves.” The patient was ultimately successfully electrically cardioverted resulting in resolution of her presenting symptoms, neck pulsations, and tachycardia. While irregular “cannon A waves” can be seen in conditions of AV dissociation, regular “cannon A waves” strongly favor the diagnosis of AVNRT.     

Multiple Anterograde and Retrograde AV Nodal Pathways: Demonstration by Multiple Discontinuities in the AV Nodal Conduction Curves and Echo Time Intervals

Programmed electrical cardiac stimulation was performed in a 40-year-old man with documented recurrent, sustained ventricular tachycardia which was refractory to standard medical therapy. Both the presence of several discontinuities in the AV nodal conduction curves during atrial and ventricular stimulation and the time intervals of the AV nodal echo phenomena suggested the presence of multiple AV nodal pathways. The results of this study are of interest in further increasing our understanding of the electrophysiologic behavior of the human AV node.     

Tachycardiomyopathy secondary to nonreentrant atrioventricular nodal tachycardia: recovery after slow pathway ablation

Nonreentrant atrioventricular (AV) nodal tachycardia is a rare form of arrhythmia due to simultaneous anterograde conduction in dual AV pathways, one atrial impulse triggering two ventricular complexes. We report the case of a 74-year-old man referred for incessant palpitations resistant to antiarrhythmic medication, and effort dyspnea. A nonreentrant AV nodal tachycardia is diagnosed with electrophysiological study. A dilated cardiomyopathy with left ventricular dysfunction is found with gated blood pool single-photon emission computed tomography. A radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow pathway is successfully performed. The patient is reassessed 11 months after ablation. He is asymptomatic and left ventricular function has fully recovered.     

Usefulness of Intravenous Propofol Anesthesia for Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Patients with Tachyarrhythmias: Infeasibility for Pediatric Patients with Ectopic Atrial Tachycardia

General anesthesia is sometimes required during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of various tachyarrhythmias because of an anticipated prolonged procedure and the need to ensure stability during critical ablation. In this study, we examine the feasibility of using propofol anesthesia for RFCA procedure. There were 150 patients (78 male, 72 female; mean age 30 years, range 4-96 years) in the study. Electrophysiologic study was performed before and during propofol infusion in the initial 20 patients and was performed only during propofol infusion in the remaining 130 patients. In the initial 20 patients, propofol infusion increased the sinus rate and facilitated AV nodal conduction. The accessory pathway effective refractory period, as well as the sinus node recovery time, atrial effective refractory period, and ventricular effective refractory period were not significantly changed. There were 152 tachyarrhythmias in 150 patients (24 atrial flutter, 31 AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, 68 AV reciprocating tachycardia, 12 ventricular tachycardia, and 17 atrial tachycardia). Most (148/152) tachycardias remained inducible after anesthesia and RFCA was performed uneventfully. However, in four of the seven pediatric patients with ectopic atrial tachycardia, the tachycardia terminated after propofol infusion and could not be induced by isoproterenol infusion. Consequently, RFCA could not be performed. Intravenous propofol anesthesia is feasible during RFCA for most tachyarrhythmias except for ectopic atrial tachycardia in children.     

Modification of the DDD Pacing Mode to Prevent Junctional Reentry Tachycardia: Computer Modelling Experiments

This paper examines the possibility of using short atrioventricular (AV) delay dual chamber pacing to prevent junctional reentry tachycardia mediated by an accessory pathway or by an intra-AV nodal circuit. For this purpose, a clinically realistic computer simulation model of cardiac rhythm and heart-pacemaker interactions has been used. The computational experiments compared the actions of two pacemaker models: (A) a clinically realistic DDD mode operating with quasi-Wenckebach prolongation of the AV delay; and (B) a new modification of the DDD mode introducing independent counters for the atrial and ventricular refractory periods of the heart, and the possibility of instantaneous or shortly delayed atrial pacing triggered by a sensed or paced ventricular event. The pathological phenomena modelled in the experiments simulate different possibilities of tachycardia initiation. These disorders include: (1) single atrial premature beats (APBs), (2) salvos of APBs, (3) closely coupled pairs of APBs, (4) ventricular premature beats initiating an antidromic reentry tachycardia, and (5) ventricular ectopic beats initiating an AV nodal reentry tachycardia. The computational results prove that many possible mechanisms of initiation of junctional reentry tachycardia are beyond the prophylactic capabilities of current sophisticated DDD pacemakers (A). The results also show that the suggested pacing mode (B) improves anti-tachycardia prophylaxis even when responding to complex pathological episodes of the natural cardiac activity. Future development of the suggested mode (B) is discussed.     

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Concealed Atrio-His Bypass Tract Involved in Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia

In a patient with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and without any evidence for preexcitation syndrome or dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathways, the tachycardia reentry circuit consisted of the AV node as an antegrade limb of the circuit and a concealed atrio-His bypass tract located in the posterior septum as a retrograde limb. During the tachycardia, the atrial potentials in the septal region and coronary sinus were inscribed in the QRS complex, and the earliest atrial activation site was located in the posterior septum. Ventricular extrastimulation at critically short intervals reproducibly demonstrated a ventriculo-His-atrial activation sequence with the same earliest retrograde atrial activation site as that during the tachycardia. Radiofrequency energy (20 W) was applied to this earliest activation site during ventricular pacing, which resulted in complete ventriculo-atrial block within 2 seconds after energy application. The antegrade AV conduction property was not affected and the tachycardia was no longer induced. The patient has been free from tachycardia attack for a follow-up period of 8 months. Therefore, radiofrequency catheter ablation for an atrio-His bypass tract is feasible without inducing any AV conduction disturbance.     

Cardiac surgery for arrhythmias

Cardiac arrhythmia surgery was initiated in 1968 with the first successful division of an accessory AV connection for the Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome. Subsequent surgical procedures included the left atrial isolation procedure and the right atrial isolation procedure for automatic atrial tachycardias, discrete cryosurgery of the AV node for AV nodal reentry tachycardia, the atrial transection procedure, corridor procedure and Maze procedure for atrial fibrillation, the right ventricular disconnection procedure for arrhythmogenic right ventricular tachycardia, the encircling endocardial ventriculotomy, subendocardial resection procedure, endocardial cryoablation, the Jatene procedure, and the Dor procedure for ischemic ventricular tachycardia. Because of monumental strides in the treatment of most refractory arrhythmias by endocardial catheter techniques during the past decade, the only remaining viable surgical procedures for cardiac arrhythmias are the Maze procedure for atrial fibrillation and the Dor procedure for ischemic ventricular tachycardia. Nevertheless, the 25-30 years of intense activity in the field of cardiac arrhythmia surgery provided the essential foundation for the development of these catheter techniques and represent one of the most exciting and productive eras in the history of medicine. In one short professional career, we have witnessed the birth of arrhythmia surgery, its adolescence as an "esoteric" specialty, its prime as an enlightening yet exhausting period, and finally its waning years as a source of knowledge and wisdom on which better methods of treatment have been founded. One could hardly ask for a more rewarding experience.     

Electrophysiological characteristics of junctional rhythm during ablation of the slow pathway in different types of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND: Junctional rhythm (JR) is commonly observed during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the slow pathway for atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia. However, the atrial activation pattern and conduction time from the His-bundle region to the atria recorded during JR in different types of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia have not been fully defined. METHODS: Forty-five patients who underwent RF ablation of the slow pathway for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia were included; 27 patients with slow-fast, 11 patients with slow-intermediate, and 7 patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. The atrial activation pattern and HA interval (from the His-bundle potential to the atrial recording of the high right atrial catheter) during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (HA(SVT)) and JR (HA(JR)) were analyzed. RESULTS: In all patients with slow-fast AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the atrial activation sequence recorded during JR was similar to that of the retrograde fast pathway, and transient retrograde conduction block during JR was found in 1 (4%) patient. The HA(JR) was significantly shorter than the HA(SVT) (57 +/- 24 vs 68 +/- 21 ms, P < 0.01). In patients with slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the atrial activation sequence of the JR was similar to that of the retrograde fast pathway in 5 (45%), and to that of the retrograde intermediate pathway in 6 (55%) patients. Transient retrograde conduction block during JR was noted in 1 (9%) patient. The HA(JR) was also significantly shorter than the HA(SVT) (145 +/- 27 vs 168 +/- 29 ms, P = 0.014). In patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, retrograde conduction with block during JR was noted in 7 (100%) patients. The incidence of retrograde conduction block during JR was higher in fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia than slow-fast (7/7 vs 1/11, P < 0.01) and slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (7/7 vs 1/27, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with slow-fast and slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the JR during ablation of the slow pathway conducted to the atria through the fast or intermediate pathway. In patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, there was no retrograde conduction during JR. These findings suggested there were different characteristics of the JR during slow-pathway ablation of different types of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.     

Sustained "Slow-Fasf" and "Fast-Slow" AV Nodal Re-entrant Tachycardia in a Patient with Recurrent Supraventricular Tachycardia

A case is presented of a 21-year-old woman with recurrent paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Eleclrophysioiogic study demonstrated the presence of both antegrade and retrograde dual AV nodal conduction pathways and both conventional slow-fast and atypical fast-slow forms of the AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia could be induced. Both tachycardias were successfully suppressed with a combination of digoxin and verapamil.     

Inducible atrioventricular nodal reentrant echo behind organic 2:1 infra-hisian block during sinus rhythm

A 77-year-old male patient with an intermittent 2:1 infra-Hisian block during sinus rhythm was presented with dizziness and near-syncope. During electrophysiological (EP) study, dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathways and retrograde fast pathway were easily induced by atrial and ventricular programmed stimulation, respectively. A typical slow-fast AV nodal reentrant echo beat also could be demonstrated by single atrial extrastimulation. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can occasionally exhibit 2:1 AV block. Conversely, AV nodal reentry property had been rarely reported behind 2:1 infra-Hisian block. The EP presentation from this case may support the notion that tissues below the His are not part of the reentrant circuit of AVNRT.