Surgical resection after radiochemotherapy in patients with unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

BACKGROUND: The use of chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer has been advocated for its potential ability to downstage locally advanced tumors. This article reports our experience with chemoradiotherapy for patients with unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic cancer (superior mesenteric artery or celiac axis encasement). STUDY DESIGN: Since 1998, 61 patients with radiographically unresectable, pathologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma have received standard fractionation radiation therapy (total dose, 45 Gy at 1.8 Gy, 5 d/wk) with chemotherapy, which included a continuous infusion of fluorouracil (5-FU: 650 mg/m(2)/D1-D5 and D21-D25) and cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)/bolus D2 and D22). Patients with tumor response at restaging CT scan underwent surgical exploration to determine whether the tumor was resectable. RESULTS: Thirty-eight of 61 (62%) restaged patients demonstrated a disease progression. Twenty-three patients (38%) had an objective response, with, in all cases, persistence of arterial encasement. Twenty-three patients underwent exploratory operations after chemoradiotherapy, and 13 underwent standard Whipple resection. So 13 of 23 (56%) patients who had exploratory operation, or 23 of 61 (21%) patients, underwent surgical resection. With a median followup of 27 months, median survival for the resected patients was 28 months. Median survival was 11 months in the nonresponder group (n = 38) and 20 months in the group who received a palliative procedure (n = 10). CONCLUSIONS: Locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma may be downstaged by chemoradiotherapy to allow for surgical resection. Patients whose cancer becomes resectable have a median survival at least comparable with survival after resection for initially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.     

Adjuvant 5-FU-based chemoradiotherapy for patients undergoing R-1/R-2 resections for pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Among patients treated with surgery alone, liver metastasis occurs in up to 50%, peritoneal recurrence in 25%, and local recurrence occurs in 50-80% of all patients who underwent resection. Even after a macroscopically curative resection, tumour cells might be observed by microscopy at one or more edges of the resected specimen in 20-51% (R-1) which might account for the high local recurrence. Aim of the Study: An analysis was performed in 54 patients who underwent an irradical resection (R-1 and R-2) for pancreatic cancer. 33 patients were treated with chemoradiotherapy. To evaluate the effect of therapy on survival and recurrence, this group was retrospectively compared to a group of 21 patients that did not receive chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: Radiotherapy consisted of 50 Gy external upper abdomen radiation in two courses of 3 weeks, concomitant with intravenous 5-FU 25 mg/kg/24 h continuously on the first 4 days of each treatment course. Follow-up was performed mainly by CT scanning and occasionally by US and was completed for all but 1 patient. RESULTS: The treatment protocol was completed in all patients without complications. Local recurrence was found in 6 (18%) patients in the group of patients who received adjuvant therapy versus 16 (48%) patients in the group that did not receive adjuvant therapy (p = 0.001). The median survival time for the treated group was 12.8 vs. 13.7 months in the group that did not receive chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.9). Three (9%) patients are still alive 140, 88 and 70 months after receiving surgery and adjuvant treatment. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy clearly gives a significant better local control. However, treatment with 5-FU and radiotherapy does not improve survival due to distant metastases. This therapy probably prolongs survival in only a few patients. More effective treatment methods have to be designed to prevent metastatic disease and improve survival.     

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Localized Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas

Background: The use of neoadjuvant preoperative chemoradiotherapy CRT for pancreatic cancer has been advocated for its potential ability to optimize patient selection for surgical resection and to downstage locally advanced tumors. This article reports our experience with neoadjuvant CRT for localized pancreatic cancer.Methods: Since 1995, 111 patients with radiographically localized, pathologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma have received neoadjuvant external beam radiation therapy EBRT; median, 4500 cGy with 5-flourouracil–based chemotherapy. Tumors were defined as potentially resectable PR, n = 53 in the absence of arterial involvement and venous occlusion and locally advanced LA, n = 58 with arterial involvement or venous occlusion by CT.Results: Five patients 4.5% were not restaged due to death n = 3 or intolerance of therapy n = 2. Twenty-one patients 19% manifested distant metastatic disease on restaging CT. Twenty-eight patients with initially PR tumors 53% and 11 patients with initially LA tumors 19% were resected after CRT. Histologic examination revealed significant fibrosis in all resected specimens and two complete responses. Surgical margins were negative in 72%, and lymph nodes were negative in 70% of resected patients. Median survival in resected patients has not been reached at a median follow-up of 16 months.Conclusions: Neoadjuvant CRT provided an opportunity for patients with occult metastatic disease to avoid the morbidity of resection and resulted in tumor downstaging in a minority of patients with LA tumors. Survival after neoadjuvant CRT and resection appears to be at least comparable to survival after resection and adjuvant postoperative CRT.Presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology, Washington, DC, March 15-18, 2001.     

Postoperative complications after resection of borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: The impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with conventional radiation or stereotactic body radiation therapy

Background

The impact of neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy on postoperative complications for patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains unclear. Limited studies have compared neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy versus conventional chemoradiation therapy. A retrospective study was performed to determine if perioperative complications were different among patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma receiving neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy or chemoradiation therapy.

Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: Certainties and controversies

Borderline resectable(BR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC) is currently a well-recognized entity, characterized by some specific anatomic, biological and conditional features: It includes patients with a stage of disease intermediate between the resectable and the locally advanced ones. The term BR identifies a tumour with an aggressive biological behaviour, on which a neoadjuvant approach instead of an upfront surgery one should be preferred, in order to obtain a radical resection(R0) and to avoid an early recurrence after surgery. Even if during the last decades several studies on this topic have been published, some aspects of BR-PDAC still represent a matter of debate. The aim of this review is to critically analyse the available literature on this topic, particularly focusing on: The problem of the heterogeneity of definition of BR-PDAC adopted, leading to a misinterpretation of published data; its current management(neoadjuvant vs upfront surgery); which neoadjuvant regimen should be preferably adopted; the problem of radiological restaging and the determination of resectability after neoadjuvant therapy; the post-operative outcomes after surgery; and the role and efficacy of adjuvant treatment for resected patients that already underwent neoadjuvant therapy.     

Long-term outcome after multimodality treatment for stage III thymic tumors

BACKGROUND: Surgery remains the cornerstone of therapy for thymic tumors, but the optimal treatment for advanced, infiltrative lesions is still controversial. The introduction of multimodality protocols has substantially modified survival and recurrence rate. We reviewed our 13-year prospective experience with multimodality treatment of stage III thymoma and thymic carcinoma. METHODS: Since 1989 we have prospectively used a multimodality approach in 45 stage III thymic tumors. Sixteen patients (35%) had myasthenia gravis. Twenty-three patients (51%) had pure or predominantly cortical thymoma (group 1), 11 (24.5%) had well-differentiated thymic carcinoma (group 2), and 11 (24.5%) had thymic carcinoma (group 3). Tumors that were not considered radically resectable at preoperative workup underwent biopsy and induction chemotherapy (15 patients, 33%) followed by surgical resection; all patients were referred for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS: No operative mortality was recorded; 1 treatment-related death during adjuvant chemotherapy was observed in group 1. Complete resection was feasible in 91% of patients in groups 1 and 2 and 82% in group 3. The overall 10-year survival was 78%. Ten-year survival for groups 1 and 2 was 90% and 85%, respectively; 8-year survival for group 3 was 56%. During follow-up, tumor recurrence was noted in 3 patients (13%) from group 1, 3 (27%) from group 2, and 3 (27%) from group 3. CONCLUSIONS: Multimodality treatment with induction chemotherapy (when required) and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy offers encouraging results for stage III thymic tumors; the outcome is more favorable for cortical thymoma and well-differentiated thymic carcinoma.     

Outcomes after resection of locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant therapy

BackgroundNeoadjuvant treatment frequently is performed in unresectable/borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare postoperative outcomes and survival of patients who underwent pancreatectomy after neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced/borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (neoadjuvant treatment group) with those of patients with resectable disease who underwent upfront surgery.MethodsBetween 2000 and 2008, there were 403 patients who underwent pancreatic cancer resection, 41 (10.1%) patients after neoadjuvant treatment for initially unresectable tumors and 362 (89.9%) patients had upfront surgery. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed.ResultsMortality/morbidity rates were similar in the 2 groups. Nodal metastases were significantly lower in the neoadjuvant treatment group (31.7% vs 86.2%; P < .001). A complete pathologic response was observed in 13.6% after neoadjuvant treatment. Median disease-specific survival from resection was 35 and 27 months in the neoadjuvant treatment and upfront groups, respectively (P = .74). In the neoadjuvant treatment group survival rates were similar in N0/N1 patients.ConclusionsPostoperative mortality and morbidity do not significantly increase after neoadjuvant treatment. Neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced pancreatic cancer can lead to an objective pathologic response, but this does not significantly improve survival after resection.     

Local excision of rectal carcinoma

The purpose of this study was to identify the recurrence rate, the salvage rate after recurrence, and the overall survival after local excision of rectal adenocarcinomas. A retrospective medical chart review was performed in 31 consecutive patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent local excision at Roswell Park Cancer Institute from January 1990 through December 1999. After excision nine patients were excluded from further analysis because they were found to have advanced stage on pathologic examination (T2 primary tumors with vascular invasion or T3 tumors). Eight of the nine patients underwent abdominoperineal resection as definitive therapy. In the remaining 22 patients who underwent transanal excision as definitive surgical therapy there were 13 patients with T1 tumors and nine patients with T2 tumors. Overall seven patients (32%) developed local recurrences after local excision. This included four patients with T1 and three patients with T2 primary tumors. All recurrences occurred in the seven patients who did not receive adjuvant chemoradiation. All patients underwent salvage resection of the recurrence. Four patients who underwent salvage resection of the recurrence remain without evidence of disease at a median follow-up of 19.5 months. Local excision without adjuvant therapy has an unacceptably high rate of local recurrence. Although most patients who recur locally are salvaged by radical resection the long-term results after resection remain unknown. The use of adjuvant chemoradiation appears to reduce this high recurrence rate and may eventually become a standard adjunct to local excision of rectal cancer.     

Carcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater: Patterns of Failure Following Resection and Benefit of Chemoradiotherapy

Background

Ampullary carcinoma is a rare malignancy. Despite radical resection, survival rates remain low with high rates of local failure. We performed a single-institution outcomes analysis to define the role of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in addition to surgery.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients undergoing potentially curative pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater at Duke University Hospitals between 1976 and 2009. Time-to-event analysis was performed comparing all patients who underwent surgery alone to the cohort of patients receiving CRT in addition to surgery. Local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and metastases-free survival (MFS) were estimated using the Kaplan?CMeier method.

Results

A total of 137 patients with ampullary carcinoma underwent Whipple procedure. Of these, 61 patients undergoing resection received adjuvant (n?=?43) or neoadjuvant (n?=?18) CRT. Patients receiving chemoradiotherapy were more likely to have poorly differentiated tumors (P?=?.03). Of 18 patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy, 67% were downstaged on final pathology with 28% achieving pathologic complete response (pCR). With a median follow-up of 8.8?years, 3-year local control was improved in patients receiving CRT (88% vs 55%, P?=?.001) with trend toward 3-year DFS (66% vs 48%, P?=?.09) and OS (62% vs 46%, P?=?.074) benefit in patients receiving CRT.

Conclusions

Long-term survival rates are low and local failure rates high following radical resection alone. Given patterns of relapse with surgery alone and local control benefit in patients receiving CRT, the use of chemoradiotherapy in selected patients should be considered.     

Extended Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Demonstrates Promising Postoperative Outcomes and Survival

Background

The optimum approach to neoadjuvant therapy for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is undefined. Herein we report the outcomes of an extended neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen in patients presenting with borderline resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head.

Methods

Patients identified as having borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer by American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association/Society of Surgical Oncology consensus criteria from 2008 to 2012 were tracked in a prospectively maintained registry. Included patients were initiated on a 24-week course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Medically fit patients who completed neoadjuvant treatment without radiographic progression were offered resection with curative intent. Clinicopathologic variables and surgical outcomes were collected retrospectively and analyzed.

Results

Sixty-four patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer started neoadjuvant therapy. Thirty-nine (61 %) met resection criteria and underwent operative exploration with curative intent, and 31 (48 %) were resected. Of the resected patients, 18 (58 %) had positive lymph nodes, 15 (48 %) required en-bloc venous resection, 27 (87 %) had a R0 resection, and 3 (10 %) had a complete pathologic response. There were no postoperative deaths at 90 days, 16 % of patients had a severe complication, and the 30-day readmission rate was 10 %. The median overall survival of all 64 patients was 23.6 months, whereas that of unresectable patients was 15.4 months. Twenty-five of the resected patients (81 %) are still alive at a median follow-up of 21.6 months.

Conclusions

Extended neoadjuvant chemotherapy is well tolerated by patients with borderline resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma, selects a subset of patients for curative surgery with low perioperative morbidity, and is associated with favorable survival.     

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer: experience at a single institution

HYPOTHESIS: Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRS) undergo downstaging of their tumor and have improved survival when compared with patients undergoing surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (SCR). DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary-care university medical center. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty-three patients with squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy from January 1, 1990, through December 31, 2001. Of these, 31 received CRS; 27, SCR; and 65, surgery alone. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were candidates for neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy if they had locally advanced disease (T3/T4 N0 or any T stage with N1). Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies were nonrandomized and based on the preference of the treating oncologist and surgeon. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Pathological downstaging was analyzed in the patients receiving CRS. Operative mortality, postoperative morbidity, median survival, and overall survival were compared between the CRS and SCR groups. RESULTS: Pathological downstaging (as characterized by TNM staging) was observed in 20 (64%) of the patients receiving CRS. Complete pathological responses occurred in 5 (16%) of the patients undergoing CRS. No 30-day mortality was observed in either treatment group. No statistical difference in survival was observed between groups, although a trend suggested improved survival with neoadjuvant therapy (3-year survival in CRS and SCR groups was 45% and 22%, respectively; P =.15). Complete pathological responders in the CRS group had a 1-year survival of 80% compared with 29% in nonresponders (P =.25). No statistical differences were observed between groups in relation to blood loss, length of hospital stay, mortality, or morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy effectively downstages cancer in patients with locally advanced esophageal disease. Morbidity and operative mortality were not significantly different between patients receiving neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy. The difference in overall survival between the 2 groups did not reach statistical significance, although a trend at 3 years was observed.     

Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy best predicts survival after curative resection of gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE: In Western populations, long-term survival rates after curative resection of gastric cancer remain extremely poor. The lack of effective adjuvant therapy has prompted the evaluation of neoadjuvant approaches. Since 1988, we have conducted three separate phase II trials using neoadjuvant chemotherapy to treat patients with potentially resectable gastric cancer. The present study was conducted to evaluate whether response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is predictive of survival in patients with resectable gastric cancer. METHODS: Eighty-three patients with pathologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy before planned surgical resection. Response was assessed by upper gastrointestinal series, endoscopy, computed tomography scan, and pathologic examination. RESULTS: For the three phase II trials, clinical response rates ranged from 24% to 38%. Three patients (4%) had a complete pathologic response. Sixty-one patients (73%) underwent a curative resection. Median follow-up was 26 months. Univariate analysis revealed T stage, number of positive nodes, and response to chemotherapy to be significant predictors of overall survival. However, on multivariate analysis, response to chemotherapy was found to be the only independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the single most important predictor of overall survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer. These findings support further evaluation of neoadjuvant approaches in the treatment of this disease.     

A pilot study of sphincter-sparing management of adenocarcinoma of the rectum

After analysis of 26 prospectively accrued patients with distal rectal adenocarcinomas who underwent sphincter preservation treatment, we have concluded that tumors that invade only the submucosa can safely be treated with surgery alone and that tumors that invade the muscularis or further can be safely treated with surgery combined with chemoradiotherapy. None of the patients had either local or distant recurrence, with a median follow-up of 21 months. All patients have been fully continent. The results, although preliminary, imply that resection of distal rectal adenocarcinoma with sphincter preservation, and adjuvant therapy when appropriate, have achieved local and distant control equal to the conventional Miles' abdominoperineal resection, but without the need for a permanent colostomy.     

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas: Treatment Variables and Survival Duration

Background:For patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer, the poor outcome associated with resection alone and the survival advantage demonstrated for combined-modality therapy have stimulated interest in preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The goal of this study was to analyze the effects of different preoperative chemoradiotherapy schedules, intraoperative radiation therapy, patient factors, and histopathologic variables on survival duration and patterns of treatment failure in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head.Methods:Data on 132 consecutive patients who received preoperative chemoradiation followed by pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head between June 1990 and June 1999 were retrieved from a prospective pancreatic tumor database. Patients received either 45.0 or 50.4 Gy radiation at 1.8 Gy per fraction in 28 fractions or 30.0 Gy at 3.0 Gy per fraction in 10 fractions with concomitant infusional chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine). If restaging studies demonstrated no evidence of disease progression, patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. All patients were evaluated with serial postoperative computed tomography scans to document first sites of tumor recurrence.Results:The overall median survival from the time of tissue diagnosis was 21 months (range 19–26, 95%CI). At last follow-up, 41 patients (31%) were alive with no clinical or radiographic evidence of disease. The survival duration was superior for women (P = .04) and for patients with no evidence of lymph node metastasis (P = .03). There was no difference in survival duration associated with patient age, dose of preoperative radiation therapy, the delivery of intraoperative radiotherapy, tumor grade, tumor size, retroperitoneal margin status, or the histologic grade of chemoradiation treatment effect.Conclusion:This analysis supports prior studies which suggest that the survival duration of patients with potentially resectable pancreatic cancer is maximized by the combination of chemoradiation and pancreaticoduodenectomy. Furthermore, there was no difference in survival duration between patients who received the less toxic rapid-fractionation chemoradiotherapy schedule (30 Gy, 2 weeks) and those who received standard-fractionation chemoradiotherapy (50.4 Gy, 5.5 weeks). Short-course rapid-fractionation preoperative chemoradiotherapy combined with pancreaticoduodenectomy, when performed on accurately staged patients, maximizes survival duration and is associated with a low incidence of local tumor recurrence.Presented at the 53rd Annual Cancer Symposium of the Society of Surgical Oncology, New Orleans, Louisiana, March 18, 2000     

Adjuvant treatments for resectable pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most challenging malignancies to treat successfully. The majority of patients present with unresectable advanced-stage cancer, and only 20% of patients can undergo resection. Even if surgical resection is performed, the recurrence rate is high and the survival rate after surgery is poor. Therefore, effective adjuvant therapy is needed to improve the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer. Until now, no universally accepted standard adjuvant therapy for this disease has been available: chemoradiotherapy followed by chemotherapy is considered the optimal therapy in the United States, while chemotherapy alone is the current standard in Europe. However, recent randomized controlled trials (RTOG [Radiation Therapy Oncology Group] 9704; CONKO [Charité Onkologie]-001; and a Japanese study) have suggested a benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. This article will review the clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for this disease, including the results of recent trials.     

Preoperative Capecitabine and Concurrent Radiation for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

Background

Patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) represent a high-risk group of patients due to tumor or patient-related characteristics. The optimal management of these patients has not been fully defined.

Materials and Methods

All patients undergoing evaluation for PDA between 2005 and 2008 were identified. Clinical, radiographic, and pathological data were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were staged as borderline resectable using the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) classification.

Results

A total of 170 patients with PDA were identified, 40 with borderline resectable disease. Of these, 34 borderline resectable patients (85%) completed neoadjuvant therapy and were restaged; pancreatic resection was completed in 16 patients (46%). Also, 8 patients completed 50 Gy of radiation in 28 fractions in 6 weeks, whereas 8 patients received 50 Gy in 20 fractions in 4 weeks plus chronomodulated capecitabine. An R0 resection was achieved in 12 of the 16 patients (75%). Also, 5 patients (63%) treated in 20 fractions had >90% pathologic response versus 1 (13%) treated in 28 fractions (P < .05). Borderline resectable patients completing surgery had similar survival to patients with resectable disease who underwent surgery. Patients receiving accelerated fractionation radiation had improved survival compared with patients treated with standard fractionation protocol.

Conclusions

A neoadjuvant approach to borderline resectable PDA identifies patients who are most likely to benefit from pancreatic resection. Preoperative capecitabine-based chemoradiation is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for these patients. Neoadjuvant therapy for borderline resectable PDA warrants further investigation using treatment schedules that can safely intensify irradiation dose.     

Does neoadjuvant chemoradiation downstage esophageal carcinoma?

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is administered to patients with esophageal carcinoma with the belief that this will both downstage the tumor and improve survival. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is currently the most accurate method of staging esophageal cancer for tumor (T) and lymph node (N) status. Because both EUS and neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal carcinoma are relatively new, there are few data examining the relationship between EUS stage and histological stage (the stage after resection) in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: To determine the effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on T and N stage as determined by EUS, we retrospectively compared two groups of patients with esophageal cancer staged by EUS. One group (33 patients) underwent neoadjuvant therapy (Walsh protocol: 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and 4000 rads of external beam radiation) followed by resection. The second group (22 patients), a control group, underwent resection without neoadjuvant therapy. We then compared histological stage to determine if there was a downstaging in the patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. Survival was evaluated as well. RESULTS: EUS accurately predicted histologic stage. In the control group EUS overestimated T stage in 3 of 22 (13%), underestimated N stage in 2 of 22 (9%), and overestimated N stage in 2 of 22 (9%) of patients. Preoperative radiochemotherapy downstaged (preoperative EUS stage versus pathologic specimen) 12 of 33 (36%) of patients whereas only 1 of 22 (5%) of patients in the control group was downstaged. Complete response (no tumor found in the surgical specimen) was observed in 5 of 33 (15%) of patients receiving radiochemotherapy. Survival was prolonged significantly in patients receiving radiochemotherapy: 20.6 months versus 9.6 months for those (stage II or III) patients not receiving radiochemotherapy (P <0.01). Operative time, operative blood loss, and length of stay were not significantly different between groups. Perioperative mortality was higher in the radiochemotherapy group (13%) compared with the no radiochemotherapy group (5%) but did not achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: EUS accurately stages esophageal carcinoma. Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy downstages esophageal carcinoma for T and N status. In our nonrandomized study, neoadjuvant therapy conferred a significant survival advantage. Operative risk appears to be increased in patients receiving neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy prior to esophagectomy.     

局部进展期胰腺癌新辅助治疗的现状与进展

胰腺癌恶性程度高,其总体5年生存率仅约11%。虽然根治性手术切除可能治愈胰腺癌,但仅约15%胰腺癌在首次确诊时为可切除性疾病。新辅助治疗使得有些原本不可切除的局部进展期胰腺癌（LAPC）获得了R0切除的机会。LAPC新辅助治疗是基于目前治疗现状的一种新的治疗模式,逐渐为临床外科医生接受。新辅助治疗方案的出现,使得20%～61%的LAPC经新辅助治疗后转化为可切除病例。奥沙利铂、伊立替康、氟尿嘧啶和亚叶酸钙（FOLFIRINOX）及吉西他滨联合白蛋白紫杉醇（AG）明显提高了LAPC的手术切除率,是LAPC首选一线新辅助治疗方案。各医疗中心关于LAPC新辅助治疗的方案选择、周期、评估指标、手术时机等方面仍存在较大差异。部分术前全身化疗不足以使肿瘤降期达到手术指征的LAPC患者,可将联合化放疗作为初始治疗。对于不能耐受系统性化疗的LAPC患者,可采用立体定向放射治疗（SBRT）控制局部肿瘤进展。胰腺癌的治疗靶点包括KRAS、EGFR、PARP及NTRK等。NCCN指南建议对所有LAPC患者进行基因检测,指导最佳药物治疗方案及参与新药的临床研究。胰腺癌免疫治疗主要包括免疫检查点抑制剂、过继性T...     

Pancreatic carcinoma deemed unresectable at exploration may be resected for cure: an institutional experience

Only a minority of patients with a diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) have disease amenable to curative resection. Between April 1987 and March 1999, 40 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma deemed unresectable at exploration at other institutions were considered for neoadjuvant treatments and then re-evaluated for possible re-exploration. We retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS), among three groups: Group A, 22 previously unresectable patients who were subsequently successfully resected, 20 after induction therapy; Group B, 31 patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy before their only operation; and Group C, 33 patients who were primarily resected, 27 of whom were then treated with adjuvant therapy. Of those resectable from Group A, 5 required portal venorrhaphy and 3 had hepatic artery reconstruction. Eighteen of the 40 patients were unresectable because of progression of disease with a mean OS of 8 months; 12 were assessed at second laparotomy; 6 were excluded from second operation on the basis of preoperative imaging studies. Kaplan-Meier curves showed no differences in OS among the three groups: OS in Group A was 34 months; Group B, 21; and Group C, 13 (P = 0.15). Margin status was comparable in all three groups (P = 0.52). As expected, nodal positivity was greatest in Group C (P = 0.001). There were no operative mortalities in Group A, and the morbidity rate was comparable with that of Groups B and C. Upon re-evaluation, many tumors (54%) previously deemed "unresectable" were surgically extirpated for cure with a median survival comparable with that of patients who did not undergo previous exploration.     

Staging of pancreatic cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiation

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy is used at many institutions for treatment of localized adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Accurate staging before neoadjuvant therapy identifies patients with distant metastatic disease, and restaging after neoadjuvant therapy selects patients for laparotomy and attempted resection. The aims of this study were to (1) determine theutilityof staging laparoscopy in candidates for neoadjuvant therapy and (2) evaluate the accuracy of restaging CT following chemoradiation. Staging laparoscopy was performed in 98 patients with radiographically potentially resectable (no evidence of arterial abutment or venous occlusion) or locally advanced (arterial abutment or venous occlusion) adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Unsuspected distant metastasis was identified in 8 (18%) of 45 patients with potentially resectable tumors and 13 (24%) of 55 patients with locally advanced tumors by CT Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and restaging CT were completed in a total of 103 patients. Thirty-three patients with potentially resectable tumors by restaging CT underwent surgical exploration and resections were performed in 27 (82%). Eleven (22%) of 49 patients with locally advanced tumors by restaging CT were resected, with negative margins in 55%; the tumors in these 11 patients had been considered locally advanced because of arterial involvement on restaging CT Staging laparoscopy is useful for the exclusion of patients with unsuspected metastatic disease from aggressive neoadjuvant chemoradiation protocols. Following neoadjuvant chemoradiation, restaging CT guides the selection of patients for laparotomy but may overestimate unresectability to a greater extent than does prechemoradiation CT. Presented at the 2001 Americas Congress of the American Hepatopancreatobiliary Association, Miami, Fla., February 25, 200l.