Pediatric skin care: guidelines for assessment, prevention, and treatment

The review of the literature suggests the pediatric population is at risk for skin breakdown and therefore pressure ulcer development. The literature reveals limited information on pediatric skin care issues in comparison to the adult population. The prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers and maintenance of skin integrity in the pediatric population often is not a high priority, especially in the critically ill child. Research has demonstrated that children differ from adults in the anatomical sites of skin breakdown; however, treatment remains the same. It is important to have an understanding of the underlying physiology of ulcer formation, the factors responsible for ulcer development, and the factors that put infants and children at risk for developing pressure ulcers. Accurate assessment, documentation, prevention, and treatment are all key factors.     

Prevention and management of pressure ulcers

Pressure ulcers represent a major health problem causing a considerable amount of suffering for patients and a high financial burden for healthcare systems. The geriatric population with an increased risk of pressure ulcer development is rising constantly as a result of chronic degenerative diseases that can lead to prolonged immobilization and poor nutrition. Evidence clearly indicates that preventive measures are essential to reduce the prevalence rates of pressure ulcers; therefore healthcare professionals must be able to identify the appropriate strategies to adopt, in order to meet the individual patient's requirements. Important advances have taken place in the world of pressure ulcer treatment during the past decade. These advances are reflected in the high rate of cures being obtained. This, together with the implementation of prevention guidelines, the excellent cost/effectiveness relationship of the techniques described, and other factors, means that the field of pressure ulcers management is no more an isolated and self-administered issue in medical practice. The areas discussed here are those in which there will be linear or, in some cases, exponential growth in the decades to come.     

Best practice recommendations for the prevention and treatment of venous leg ulcers: update 2006

PURPOSE: To provide the specialist in skin and wound care with an update in recommended management of venous leg ulcers. TARGET AUDIENCE: This continuing education activity is intended for physicians and nurses with an interest in wound care and related disorders. OBJECTIVES: After reading this article and taking this test, the reader should be able to:Editor's note: This "Best Practice Recommendations" article is reprinted with permission from Wound Care Canada, The Official Publication of the Canadian Association of Wound Care (2006;4[1]:45-55). It is the third installment of 4 articles originally published in 2006, following the latest Nursing Best Practice Guidelines from the Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO), which are updated approximately every 3 years. In 2000, the Canadian Association of Wound Care produced and had published its first best practice recommendations for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers. In this article, best practice recommendations are discussed for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers. The evidence presented is connected to the RNAO's recommendations from its review of the literature up to the writing of its 2006 guidelines. Clinical decision-making in the treatment of pressure ulcers can be guided by the algorithm that directs the clinician to identify and treat the underlying causes, to identify and manage patient-centered concerns, and to provide for good local wound care, considering adjunctive therapies or biologically active dressings when the edge of the wound is not advancing. Finally, the recommendations advise putting into place those organizational and educational activities that support the translations of the guidelines into practice.     

Pressure ulcer prevention and treatment knowledge of Jordanian nurses

AimsThe aims of the study were to determine: (1) Jordanian nurses' level of knowledge of pressure ulcer prevention and treatment of hospitalized patients based on guidelines for pressure ulcer prevention and treatment. (2) Frequency of utilization of pressure ulcer prevention and treatment interventions in clinical practice. (3) Variables that are associated with nurses' utilization of pressure ulcer prevention and treatment interventions.BackgroundPressure ulcers are common and previous studies have shown education, knowledge and attitude affect implementation of interventions.MethodsA cross-sectional survey design was used to collect data from 460 nurses between June 2010 and November 2010. We used a questionnaire, which was informed by earlier work and guidelines, to collect data about nurses' knowledge and practice of pressure ulcer prevention and treatment.Results/findingsKnowledge and education show an association with implementation of prevention, and demographic variables do not. Similarly knowledge and type of hospital showed an association with implementing treatment. Of concern the use of “donuts” and massage are reported in use.ConclusionAlthough pressure ulcer care is well known by nurses, inappropriate pressure ulcer interventions were reported in use.     

The economic impact of pressure ulcers among patients in intensive care units. A systematic review

BackgroundThe incidence and prevalence of pressure ulcers in critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs) remain high, despite the wealth of knowledge on appropriate prevention strategies currently available.MethodsThe primary objective of this systematic review was to examine the economic impact of pressure ulcers (PU) among adult intensive care patients. A systematic review was undertaken, and the following databases were searched; Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was used to formulate the review. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (CHEC)-list. Data were extracted using a pre-designed extraction tool, and a narrative analysis was undertaken.ResultsSeven studies met the inclusion criteria. Five reported costs associated with the prevention of pressure ulcers and three explored costs of treatment strategies. Four main PU prevention cost items were identified: support surfaces, dressing materials, staff costs, and costs associated with mobilisation. Seven main PU treatment cost items were reported: dressing materials, support surfaces, drugs, surgery, lab tests, imaging, additional stays and nursing care. The overall validities of the studies varied between 37 and 79%, meaning that there is potential for bias within all the included studies.ConclusionThere was a significant difference in the cost of PU prevention and treatment strategies between studies. This is problematic as it becomes difficult to accurately evaluate costs from the existing literature, thereby inhibiting the usefulness of the data to inform practice. Given the methodological heterogeneity among studies, future studies in this area are needed and these should use specific methodological guidelines to generate high-quality health economic studies.     

Skin blood flow dynamics and its role in pressure ulcers

Pressure ulcers are a significant healthcare problem affecting the quality of life in wheelchair bounded or bed-ridden people and are a major cost to the healthcare system. Various assessment tools such as the Braden scale have been developed to quantify the risk level of pressure ulcers. These tools have provided an initial guideline on preventing pressure ulcers while additional assessments are needed to improve the outcomes of pressure ulcer prevention. Skin blood flow function that determines the ability of the skin in response to ischemic stress has been proposed to be a good indicator for identifying people at risk of pressure ulcers. Wavelet spectral and nonlinear complexity analyses have been performed to investigate the influences of the metabolic, neurogenic and myogenic activities on microvascular regulation in people with various pathological conditions. These findings have contributed to the understanding of the role of ischemia and viability on the development of pressure ulcers. The purpose of the present review is to provide an introduction of the basic concepts and approaches for the analysis of skin blood flow oscillations, and present an overview of the research results obtained so far. We hope this information may contribute to the development of better clinical guidelines for the prevention of pressure ulcers.     

Integrated care pathway: the prevention and management of pressure ulcers

The introduction of this pathway for the prevention and management of pressure ulcers was influenced by the development of the pathway for the management of a patient with a fractured neck of femur. Systematic documentation of preventative measures for patients with a fractured neck of femur helped reduce the incidence of pressure ulcers in this high-risk group. The original draft was informed by evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. This draft of the pathway was piloted, reviewed and changed in line with current evidence and comments from users. It was invaluable to pilot the pathway and review as necessary in order to make this a true workable document that would enable continuity of care, help prevent hospital-acquired pressure ulcers and be an effective teaching aid. A trust-wide retrospective audit of documentation for the prevention and management of pressure ulcers has been conducted, which found that the pathway facilitated a more concise approach to inform care than standard documentation. A further audit has been undertaken in the care of the elderly directorate which has demonstrated various ways in which the pathway had been completed. Challenges remain for the effective use of this documentation. Further education needs to be completed in order to promote multiprofessional use of the pathway. The pathway is now being integrated into others, which will increase awareness and involvement of other professional groups in this important aspect of patient care. Ongoing audit will take place to assess the impact upon patient outcomes.     

Developing the tissue viability seating guidelines

BackgroundCosts for the prevention and management of pressure ulcers have increased significantly with limited published advice from health and social care organisations on seating and preventing pressure ulcers. At the request of the UK Tissue Viability Society the aim of the publication was to develop a practical guide for people, carers and health and social care professionals on how the research and evidence base on pressure ulcer prevention and management can be applied to those who remain seated for extended periods of time.Methods and findingsThe evidence base informing the guidelines was obtained by applying a triangulation of methods: a literature review, listening event and stakeholder group consultation. The purpose was to engage users and carers, academics, clinicians, inspectorate and charities, with an interest in seating, positioning and pressure management to: gather views, feedback, stories, and evidence of the current practices in the field to create a greater awareness of the issue.ConclusionThe new guidelines are inclusive of all people with short and long-term mobility issues to include all population groups. The document includes evidence on where pressure ulcers develop when seated, risk factors, best possible seated position and what seat adjustments are required, the ideal seating assessment, interventions, self-help suggestions and key seating outcomes. The updated TVS CPGs have been informed by the best available evidence, the insights and wisdom of experts, stakeholders and people who spend extended periods of time sitting.     

Best practice recommendations for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: update 2006

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to enhance the professional nurses' knowledge of the best practice recommendations for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers. TARGET AUDIENCE: This continuing education activity is intended for physicians and nurses with an interest in wound care. OBJECTIVES: After reading this article and taking this test, the reader should be able to: 1. Interpret the pathway to assess and treat pressure ulcers. 2. Differentiate the Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (RNAO) levels of evidence. 3. Identify the scientific evidence for treatment recommendations.     

Lessons learned from patients with spinal cord injury in managing pressure ulcers: A qualitative study

ObjectivesTo explore how individuals with spinal cord injury self-manage the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers and to provide insight into experiences with self-management support.DesignQualitative study using semi-structured interview and a deductive thematic analysis.SettingCommunity.ParticipantsTwelve of the 14 participating adults with a spinal cord injury had experience with pressure ulcers, and eight of these had a current pressure ulcer.ResultsRespondents suggested to tailor treatment of pressure ulcers to patients’ individual wishes and capabilities of patients. Patients and caregivers need to be aware of the importance of determining the cause of pressure ulcers to prevent deterioration. Patients often depend on informal caregivers for follow-up and prevention, and healthcare professionals in non-SCI specialties often lack the knowledge needed to manage pressure ulcers in this specific patient group. Tailored education and peer support are important for patients to set boundaries, be assertive, and cultivate a positive attitude when dealing with pressure ulcers. It is difficult to combine treatment of severe pressure ulcers and preventive measures with work roles. Managing the social impact of pressure ulcers requires more coordination with caregivers.ConclusionsTo support self-management of pressure ulcers in patients with a spinal cord injury, they must find out which preventive measures and treatments suit them best. Healthcare professionals play an important role in the self-management of pressure ulcers and can help patients deal with the emotional and social impact of pressure ulcers. To know patient's needs and tailor their education, healthcare professionals of non SCI organizations need to have knowledge of pressure ulcers management of this specific patient group.     

The prevalence,management, equipment provision and outcome for patients with pressure ulceration identified in a wound care survey within one English health care district

The prevalence of pressure ulceration within the population receiving health care in Bradford, UK was 0.74 people with a pressure ulcer per 1000 population (95% CI 0.6–0.8). This prevalence includes a number of tertiary referrals and if these are removed the prevalence falls to 0.71 people with a pressure ulcer per 1000 population. Of the pressure ulcers encountered 195 (53.7%) were classed as grade 2 pressure ulcers with 80 grade 3 wounds and 40 grade 4 pressure ulcers. Forty-eight pressure ulcers were identified as grade 1 wounds but the accuracy of this classification may be in doubt given that 24 apparent grade 1 pressure ulcers were reported to have visible wound beds with common reports of slough and granulation tissue. Severe pressure ulcers differed from less severe partial thickness wounds – grade 3 and 4 pressure ulcers tended to be larger, of longer duration, with greater coverage of the wound bed with necrotic tissue and less granulation and epithelial tissue. Wound exudate was heavier where people presented with severe pressure ulcers while there was a greater probability of wound infection (37.5% of grade 4 pressure ulcers were infected). Given these challenges it was perhaps unsurprising that people with severe pressure ulcers were more likely to have been risk assessed, to have had a critical incident form completed (although only 35% of grade 4 pressure ulcers were identified as having been reported on a critical incident form), to be provided with a powered PR mattress in bed and to be dressed with an antimicrobial dressing. The time to treat each severe pressure ulcer tended to be longer than was the treatment times for less severe wounds. Only 40 people with pressure ulcers (11%) as their most serious wound were located in hospital, suggesting that current pressure ulcer epidemiology and costs may be understated given their reliance on previous hospital based surveys of pressure ulcers. Another potential confounder of pressure ulcer epidemiological studies may be the number of nursing home beds in the surveyed population. On breaking down the Bradford audit data by postcode the pressure ulcer prevalence ranged between 0.13 and 1.39 people with a pressure ulcer per 1000 population with the higher prevalence proportions found in postcodes with large numbers of nursing home beds. It would appear to be prudent to record the number of nursing home beds within community based populations where pressure ulcers (and potentially other wounds) are being recorded.     

中国儿童银屑病生物治疗专家共识（2021）

【摘要】 对于中重度儿童银屑病,若外用药治疗无法控制病情,临床则需要考虑系统治疗。儿童属于生物制剂应用的特殊人群,应用的剂量、疗效及安全性与成人不尽相同。为此,我国儿童银屑病诊疗领域部分专家依据国内外指南及共识、相关文献及临床经验,经过深入讨论,制定本共识。从生物制剂的应用原则、应用方法、疗效及安全性、疗程及停药时机、用药前筛查及用药过程中监测等方面提供指导性意见,希望为我国中重度儿童银屑病患者生物制剂的应用提供参考依据。     

The decubitus ulcer: Facts and controversies

Defining the decubitus ulcer proves as difficult as agreeing on a name for the condition. Causes include pressure over bony prominences, shearing force, destruction of skin, and compromised blood flow. Evidence is emerging of the importance of ischemia as a primary causative agent, rather than pressure, which needs further investigation. Scales, staging, and treatment and prevention guidelines should be used with caution due to their arbitrary implementation and lack of evidence-based support. Unfortunately, much of the research and expert opinion developed by the government and touted as regulation lacks appropriate strength-of-evidence. Although decubitus ulcers should be prevented and treated to the best of our abilities, recognizing the possibility that the skin, like any other organ in the body, may fail is crucial.     

Pressure ulcers induced by drug administration: A new concept and report of four cases in elderly patients

Drug‐induced akinesia is a potential cause of pressure ulcers. However, pressure ulcers that are caused by drug‐induced akinesia are not considered an adverse drug reaction (ADR). We propose that drug‐induced pressure ulcers (DIPU) are pressure ulcers that are caused by an external force that is experienced after drug administration, and we considered resolution of these ulcers after drug discontinuation to be a supportive finding. In this report, we reviewed the medical records of pressure ulcer cases from a 300‐bed hospital. Among 148 patients, four patients with pressure ulcers met the criterion for DIPU. In these cases, the suspected DIPU were related to treatment with olanzapine, fluvoxamine, valproic acid, clotiazepam, triazolam and rilmazafone. These drugs were administrated to manage the patients' behavioral and psychological symptoms that accompanied dementia. The DIPU in these patients were categorized as stage IV according to the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel criteria. Discontinuation of the causal drugs led to significant improvements or complete healing of the pressure ulcers, and the patients subsequently recovered their mobility. Therefore, we propose that DIPU are potential ADR that have been overlooked in clinical practice. Thus, recognition of DIPU as an ADR may be important in preventing and appropriately managing pressure ulcers among elderly patients.     

A survey of pressure ulcer education within pre-registration radiography courses

The prevention of pressure ulcers and the management of people with pressure ulcers is multi-disciplinary, though in many places it is considered a nursing problem. Radiography environments are a potential cause of pressure ulcers. This paper describes the results of a survey of pre-registration radiography education institutions regarding the education provision on the prevention of pressure ulcers within radiography environments. The survey comprised two parts--a desk top review of course prospectuses and a postal questionnaire. Course prospectuses for 23 of the 24 institutions were examined for specific mention of prevention and management of pressure ulcers but none was found. All 24 institutions in the United Kingdom were invited to respond to a questionnaire survey, and 14 replied (58% response rate). Responses covered both diagnostic and therapeutic radiography programmes. Nine institutions specifically identify teaching on pressure ulcers, with the majority of education appearing in year 1 of the course, with some courses providing further material later in the programme. The survey confirms anecdotal evidence reported in a previous study that radiographers have little training in the prevention and management of patients at risk of developing pressure ulcers during radiographic procedures. Thirteen out of 14 institutions stated that no final year student project had considered the prevention and management of pressure ulcers in radiography environments.     

Understanding the association between pressure ulcers and sitting in adults what does it mean for me and my carers? Seating guidelines for people,carers and health & social care professionals

The aim of the publication was to develop a practical guide for people, carers and health and social care professionals on how the research and evidence base on pressure ulcer prevention and management can be applied to those who remain seated for extended periods of time. This publication was developed at the request of the Tissue Viability Society in order to revise the original seating guidelines from 2008 as evidence and subsequent care has moved forward in relation to this area. Since 2008, the costs for the prevention and management of pressure ulcers have increased significantly and there is limited published advice from health and social care organisations on seating and preventing pressure ulcers. These guidelines have been written for:

• •People
• •Carers
• •Health and Social Care professionals
• •Education and training staff
• •Independent sector.

Who live or work in primary, secondary, and tertiary settings.     

Prevention of pressure injuries in critically ill children: A preliminary evaluation

AimsTo evaluate a prevention strategy implemented to reduce incidence and severity of positioning related pressure injuries affecting pediatric patients in a pediatric critical care unit. Secondary objective was to evaluate compliance with preventive recommendations.BackgroundThe skin in infants or children has important physiological and anatomical differences compared with adults. Further, factors such as the immaturity of the skin and limited activity and mobility in pediatric critical care unit, along with the pressure exerted by medical devices, increases the risk of pressure ulcers in infants and children. The most effective preventive measures specific to this intensive care population need to be evaluated.Material and methodsQuasi-experimental before-after study with consecutive sampling. The effectiveness of the care bundle implementation was evaluated based on the latest evidence (intervention group) versus the application of non-standardized care (control group). Pediatric patients up to 14 years old at risk of suffering from pressure injuries and who were admitted more than 48 h in a pediatric intensive care unit (level III) participated. For the collection of data, two computer programs and the hospital clinical records of each participant were consulted. The data collection period was 6 months per group (pre and post intervention).ResultsA sample of 110 patients was obtained (50 control group and 60 intervention group). The cumulative incidence in pediatric patients exposed to the risk of pressure injuries was reduced from 16% to 13.3%; and in the subgroup of patients with prolonged stay (≥28 days), the incidence was reduced from 55.55% to 20%. In the intervention group, category III and IV pressure ulcers were completely reduced. In addition, the total number of pressure injuries decreased by 21.43%. The care bandle recommendations with the highest level of adhesion recorded were: skin inspection, application of hyperoxygenated fatty acids and use of a special support surface. The main risk factor found during the study was the prone position (p < 0.05).ConclusionsThe application of a care bundle for prevention can be an effective solution to reduce the number and severity of LPPs in an intensive care unit. The most vulnerable subgroup of patients may benefit from the application of these resources.     

Pressure ulcer knowledge in medical residents: an opportunity for improvement

With the aging population and increasing complexity of patients with pressure ulcers (PrUs), as well as regulatory requirements, PrUs have become an important concern for physicians. Although there are some studies that measure nurses' knowledge of PrUs, there is a paucity of literature about physician knowledge of PrUs. Given that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services is holding physicians accountable for documenting PrU status on admission to hospitals and the increased need for collaboration with revisions to long-term-care documentation MDS 3.0: Skin Condition, physicians' knowledge regarding PrUs takes on new urgency. This study reports on PrU knowledge of physicians using 2 tools: the Pieper Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Tool and a wound photograph test. Physicians' mean scores of 69% on the Pieper Tool were well below average scores of nurses' 76%. Physicians had greatest difficulty identifying suspected deep tissue injury and unstageable ulcers. Pressure ulcer content, including prevention, identification, staging, and treatment, needs to be included in physician education.     

The trend of pressure ulcer prevalence rates in German hospitals: Results of seven cross-sectional studies

Pressure ulcer prevalence rates provide useful information about the magnitude of this health problem. Only limited information on pressure ulcers in Germany was available before 2001. The purpose of this study was to compare results of seven pressure ulcer prevalence surveys which were conducted annually between 2001 and 2007 and to explore whether pressure ulcer prevalence rates decreased. The second aim was to evaluate if the measured prevalence rates of our sample could be generalised for all German hospitals.Results of seven point pressure ulcer prevalence studies conducted in 225 German hospitals were analysed. Chi-square tests, chi-square trend tests and one-way ANOVA to assess differences and trends across the years were applied. The sample was stratified according to pressure ulcer risk and speciality. Finally, study samples were compared with the potential population.In total data of 40,247 hospital patients were analysed. The overall pressure ulcer prevalence rate in German hospitals was 10.2%. Patient samples of each year were comparable regarding gender, age and pressure ulcer risk. Pressure ulcer prevalence rates decreased from 13.9% (year 2001) to 7.3% (year 2007) (p < 0.001). When excluding non-blanchable erythema prevalence rates decreased from 6.4% (year 2001) to 3.9% (year 2007) (p = 0.015). An explicit decrease of prevalence rates was observed on geriatric wards. Prevalence rates on neurological and intensive care units remained stable. With some limitations our study results are representative for all hospitals within Germany.It is highly probable that the decrease of prevalence rates was due to an increased awareness of the pressure ulcer problem in Germany and subsequent efforts to improve pressure ulcer prevention and treatment. The quality of clinical practice regarding pressure ulcer prevention and treatment has improved. However, pressure ulcers are still relevant and require attention. In 2007, one out of 10 hospital patients who were at pressure ulcer risk had at least one pressure related skin damage.