Unhealed extraction sites mimicking TMJ pain

A case of unhealed extraction sites in the mandible is described, including clinical, radiographic, and biopsy findings. The subject was treated for TMJ disease in the past but still had related signs and symptoms and facial pain.     

Placement of endosseous implants into tooth extraction sites

This study reports 4-year experiences with placement of hydroxylapatite-coated dental implants into extraction sites immediately after tooth extraction. Small defects present after implant placement were treated with dense, nonresorbable hydroxylapatite. Larger defects present after implant placement were treated with demineralized bone. Indications and contraindications for placement, as well as surgical techniques, are discussed.     

Periodontal conditions of teeth adjacent to extraction sites

The purpose of the present clinical study was to evaluate the effect of tooth extractions on the periodontal conditions of adjacent teeth. 40 patients were selected for the study. Prior to the extractions, baseline data of the adjacent teeth were obtained. Plaque (PII) and gingival indices (GI), pocket probing depths and probing attachment levels were scored. In addition, the alveolar bone height was determined radiographically in relation to the CEJ adjacent to the extraction sites. The contralateral side of the jaw, where no tooth had to be removed, was examined as a control. A limited hygienic phase (scaling and root planing of all surfaces examined) was performed immediately prior to the extractions. Using the same parameters, all sites were reexamined 2-4 months and 6-9 months following the extractions. After the hygienic phase, the teeth adjacent to the extraction sites indicated a decrease in the pocket probing depths by 0.5 to 1.5 mm. In shallow pockets (1-3 mm), this decrease was less pronounced than in moderate to deep pockets (4-9 mm), where it was composed of shrinkage of the gingival tissues and gain of probing attachment. The radiographic level of the bony alveolar crest in relation to the CEJ of the adjacent teeth was not altered by the extraction procedure. The oral hygiene performances of the patients were not influenced during the 9-month observation period. Therefore, neither PII nor GI scores showed relevant improvements.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A radiographic study of roots in extraction sites.

1) Roots that are overparalleled to the extent that the apices touch do not relapse to the desired upright positions. 2) Roots that are overparalleled, but the apices do not touch, tend to upright but, in so doing, leave space between the crowns. 3) Roots that are underparalleled at the completion of active treatment tend to maintain their positions or diverge even farther. 4) The best postretention results were cases in which roots and crowns were positioned in normal, upright parallel positions. Slight spaced remaining in these situations appeared to close evenly.     

Long-term periodontal status of teeth moved into extraction sites

The present study was undertaken to assess the long-term periodontal status adjacent to teeth that had been moved orthodontically into extraction sites. Twelve persons with a mean age of 29.2 +/- 5.7 (SD) years, who had completed orthodontic therapy at least 10 years previously, were examined. The orthodontic treatment had included bilateral premolar extraction in only the maxilla. Interproximal tooth surfaces in the maxilla adjacent to the extraction sites (study group) were compared to corresponding tooth surfaces in the mandible (control group) with respect to plaque, visual inflammation, bleeding after probing, pocket depth, gingival recession, loss of connective tissue attachment, radiographic bone height, and root resorption. Statistical comparisons were made via analyses of variance and t tests. There were no differences between the groups for any clinical parameter except the presence of less visual inflammation in study subjects. Radiographically, there were no differences in crestal alveolar bone levels measured from the cementoenamel junction. Bone height evaluation by the Bjorn method showed less alveolar support in the study group. However, this was due to the influence of root resorption rather than an effect on crestal height. It was concluded that orthodontic movement of teeth into extraction sites had been without detrimental effect upon the adjacent periodontal status.     

Soft tissue management at implant sites

Background: Dental implants are widely used to replace lost teeth. It was suggested that surgical manipulation/augmentation of peri-implant soft tissue may be beneficial to increase the width/thickness of keratinized tissue (KT) and to enhance aesthetic outcomes of implant therapy. The aim of this paper was to provide a narrative review of the literature concerning soft tissue management at implant sites.
Material and Methods: Clinical studies were identified with both medline and hand searches. Three topics were considered in this review: (i) the significance of KT at implant sites, (ii) the surgical techniques to increase KT and (iii) soft tissue stability around implants.
Results: Several papers concerning soft tissue management at implant sites were identified, mainly expert opinions, case reports and case series. In addition, a systematic review was selected. Generally, the level of evidence was weak. So far, literature analysis showed that (i) the width of KT did not influence the survival rate of dental implants; (ii) there is no evidence to recommend a specific technique to preserve/augment KT; and (iii) factors including bone level, KT and implant features have not been shown to be associated with future mucosal recession around dental implants.
Conclusion: Although scientific evidence in most part is lacking, soft tissue augmentation at implant sites may need to be considered in some clinical situations.     

Interdisciplinary treatment of an adult patient with old extraction sites

This case report describes the interdisciplinary treatment of a 31-year-old female patient showing a protrusive profile, maxillary constriction, mandibular crowding, a Class III canine relationship complicated with multiple missing teeth, old atrophic extraction sites, and periodontal defects. The lower dental arch irregularity was eliminated by air-rotor stripping (ARS). The upper extraction site was opened for prosthetic rehabilitation, whereas closure of the lower extraction space was preferred. The narrow alveolar crest of the atrophic bone was augmented with the use of autogenous bone, beta-tricalcium phosphate (Cerasorb), and autogenous platelet-rich plasma. A functional and esthetic occlusion in an improved facial profile was established at the end of orthodontic treatment combined with ARS technique, surgery, and prosthodontics.     

Bone formation following implantation of bone biomaterials into extraction sites

BACKGROUND: Adequate bone volume is imperative for the osseointegration of endosseous implants, but postextraction resorption and remodeling may challenge implant placement. The use of bone biomaterials has been advocated to fill extraction sites and to enhance primary implant stability during osseointegration. The objective of the case series was to evaluate bone formation histologically and biomechanically in extraction sites following implantation of three commercially available bone biomaterials to compare their ability to allow guided bone regeneration. METHODS: Thirty-six periodontally involved teeth were extracted from eight healthy non-smoking subjects. At least two bone biomaterials, a synthetic sponge based on polylactic-polyglycolic acid technology (FIS), bovine porous bone mineral (BPBM), or a natural coral derivative physically and chemically transformed into a calcium carbonate ceramic (COR), and one non-grafted control were applied to the extraction sockets within each subject and were covered by an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene device. The devices were removed after 2 months, and trephine biopsies were obtained from each site 4 months later. At that time, endosseous implants were placed in 25 of the sites, and healing abutments were placed; measurements were taken 4 to 6 months later with an electronic mobility testing device. RESULTS: The percentage of residual biomaterial was 5.6% +/- 8.9% for FIS (P <0.001), 20.2% +/- 17.0% for BPBM (P <0.05), and 12.0% +/- 16.4% for COR (P <0.001). The amount of residual biomaterial after 6 months showed a significant relationship with the insertion torque measurements during the first third of implant insertion (P <0.05) and with values of the electronic mobility testing device at the abutment connection (P = 0.05). Histologically, new bone apposition was seen on BPBM particles. FIS sites showed similar ingrowth of blood vessels and osteocytes as empty controls. CONCLUSION: All sites revealed good primary stability at implant insertion and proper implant rigidity at abutment placement, indicating that early implant osseointegration was not influenced by the application of bone biomaterials used in this study.     

Comparison of 3 bone substitutes in canine extraction sites.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the healing response with 3 different bone substitute materials in extraction sites in the dog. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four dogs had their mandibular and maxillary premolars extracted atraumatically. The sites were immediately grafted with anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss, Osteohealth, Shirley, NY), Bone Source (Leibinger, Inc, Kalamazoo, MI), or Embarc (Lorenz Surgical, Jacksonville, FL), or left untreated as a control. After 8 weeks, the sites were removed for histologic evaluation of bone fill and the healing response. RESULTS: All sites healed well without signs of infection. No significant differences were noted in the shape of the ridges between groups. The control sites had radiographic bone fill by 8 weeks. The Bio-Oss sites showed bone fill with a similar appearance to the control sites. The Bone Source and Embarc sites showed implant material taking up most of the extraction site. In all sites the control and Bio-Oss sites had significantly more bone formation than the Embarc and Bone Source sites (P <.05). The control sites contained woven bone. The Bio-Oss sites were similar to the control sites, but with remnants of Bio-Oss in the bone. The Bone Source and Embarc sites were filled predominantly with the graft material without evidence of resorption and replacement of the materials, and with minimal bone formation. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, the control and Bio-Oss sites were similar, with bone filling most of the extraction site. The other 2 materials did not show replacement with bone.     

The effect of different extraction sites upon incisor retraction.

1. From this study, it was found that in cases treated by the Begg technique one can anticipate greater retraction of the anterior dental units in nonextraction (see article) cases, in both types of premolar extraction cases, and in cases, involving extraction of first molars plus first premolars than would be expected on the basis of root surface area resistance values. 2. There is a likely explanation for this. Molars were maintained upright and allowed to move bodily only while incisors were not only moved bodily but often partially tipped as well. 3. The actual mean anterior retraction in first molar extraction cases exhibited a close approximation to the expected mean anterior retraction values in relation to root surface resistance values. 4. Second premolar extraction is one answer to overretraction and has the added edge of creating even less incisor retraction than second premolar extraction. 5. It was also found that the extraction of premolars alone did not result (see article) in a significant change in the increased eruption of the third molars into functional occlusion. A very significant improvement in the rate of sucessful third molar eruption was found in first molar extraction cases and in cases involving extraction of first molars plus first premolars. 6. The mean ages of the patients in the various treatment categories at the start of treatment were similar enough to each other to suggest that age at the start of treatment had no bearing on the success rate of third molar erup tion. Extraction-site selection seemed to be the dominating factor in successful third molar eruption. 7. It was found that the group of cases that exhibited the least amount of anterior retraction also inhibited the least amount of anterior relapse and, conversely, the group of cases exhibiting the greatest amount of anterior retraction also exhibited the greatest amount of anterior relapse. (see article) 8. The nonextraction cases, with no extraction space to close, were treated in the shortest mean time, while the eight-tooth (first molar plus first premolar) extraction cases having the greatest amount of extraction space required the greatest amount of mean treatment time.9. In conclusion, it can be said that changing the location of the extraction site resulted in a change in relative root surface areas of the opposing anchor units in the anterior and posterior segments. There was a definite and predictable change in the amount of anterior retraction achieved by varying the location of the extraction site. This should be considered in the diagnosis, so that a desired treatment goal for the final position of the incisors within the facial profile can be achieved.     

Evaluation of oral antimicrobial agent levels in tooth extraction sites

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate various oral antimicrobial agent levels in tooth extraction sites. STUDY DESIGN: The concentration of dental alveolar blood in extraction wounds after the oral administration of talampicillin (500 mg), cefaclor (500 mg), cefteram pivoxil (200 mg), cefuroxime axetil (250 mg), cefdinir (200 mg), and ofloxacin (100 mg) was determined in 338 patients and was assessed on the basis of its antimicrobial activity against Streptococcus isolated in odontogenic infections. RESULTS: The percentage of patients whose concentrations exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration for 90% of Streptococcus was 62.5% to 100% for talampicillin at 30 to 360 minutes, 0% to 12.5% for cefaclor at 30 to 360 minutes, 18.2% to 100% for cefteram pivoxil at 30 to 480 minutes, 50% to 100% for cefuroxime axetil at 30 to 480 minutes, 0% to 50% for cefdinir at 16 to 290 minutes, and 0% to 40% for ofloxacin at 30 to 480 minutes. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that talampicillin, cefteram pivoxil, and cefuroxime axetil have minimum inhibitory concentration levels for 90% of Streptococcus in tooth sockets.     

Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites

BACKGROUND: The marginal gap that may occur following implant installation in an extraction socket may be resolved by hard-tissue fill during healing. OBJECTIVE: To study dimensional alterations of hard tissues that occur following tooth extraction and immediate placement of implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighteen subjects with a total of 21 teeth scheduled for extraction were included. Following flap elevation and the removal of a tooth and implant installation, clinical measurements were made to characterize the dimension of the surrounding bone walls, as well as the marginal defect. No membranes or filler material was used. The flaps were subsequently replaced and secured with sutures in such a way that the healing cap of the implant was exposed to the oral environment. After 4 months of healing a re-entry procedure was performed and the clinical measurements were repeated. RESULTS: Fifty-two marginal defects exceeding 3 mm were present at baseline: 21 at buccal, 17 at lingual/palatal, and 14 at approximal surfaces. At the re-entry eight defects exceeding 3.0 mm remained. During the 4 months of healing, the bone walls of the extraction underwent marked change. The horizontal resorption of the buccal bone dimension amounted to about 56%. The corresponding resorption of the lingual/palatal bone was 30%. The vertical bone crest resorption amounted to 0.3+/-0.6 mm (buccal), 0.6+/-1.0 mm (lingual/palatal), 0.2+/-0.7 mm (mesial), and 0.5+/-0.9 mm (distal). CONCLUSION: The marginal gap that occurred between the metal rod and the bone tissue following implant installation in an extraction socket may predictably heal with new bone formation and defect resolution. The current results further documented that marginal gaps in buccal and palatal/lingual locations were resolved through new bone formation from the inside of the defects and substantial bone resorption from the outside of the ridge.     

Immediate placement of implants in extraction sites of maxillary impacted canines

BACKGROUND: Treatment of asymptomatic impacted maxillary canines in adults is inevitable when primary canine becomes lost through extraction or exfoliation or when the impacted tooth becomes symptomatic. Treatment alternatives include an orthodontic procedure to bring the unerupted tooth to the dental arch or prosthetic replacement of the missing tooth. The authors describe an alternative treatment that involves immediate placement of implants into extraction sockets of the teeth. CASE DESCRIPTION: A patient with bilateral palatally impacted upper canines chose to have the unerupted teeth removed and replaced with implants and crowns. Two hydroxyapatite cylindrical implants were inserted through the alveolar ridge into the extraction sites. The unfilled areas in the extraction sites, around the dental implants, were packed and covered with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft in conjunction with a collagen membrane barrier. Six months after implantation, computed tomography revealed complete osseous fill of the extraction defects and no bone loss around the implants. The implants were uncovered, and porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations were fabricated and placed. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This treatment modality avoids the need for conventional preparation of teeth as part of prosthetic reconstruction or prolonged orthodontic treatment aimed at bringing the impacted canine to the dental arch. Combining the implantation with bone augmentation preserved the alveolar bone and shortened the treatment period.     

Immediate implant placement and temporization in extraction and healing sites

While single tooth replacement can be predictably accomplished using implant therapy, this procedure is challenging in the esthetic zone where numerous criteria must be evaluated by the restorative team. If the gingival and osseous architecture of the failing tooth is acceptable, the therapeutic goal is to maintain the existing morphological condition. The optimal tridimensional implant is placed in the esthetic zone immediately after extraction or 8 to 12 weeks after extraction. The abutment connection and the nonfunctional temporary tooth restoration are prepared in advance and should respect the forms of contour of the contralateral tooth. In some specific clinical cases, not only can the patient's smile be returned after only a few hours of clinical work, but more importantly, initial capital of soft and hard tissues can be preserved. After healing, maturation, and stabilization during the 3 to 6 months of osseointegration, a compressive impression of the implant site can be taken and the implant restoration can be cemented. A multi-centric study performed by several dentists during the past 3 years have drawn interesting statistics on the rate of success, the different type of implants, and the variation of the peri-implant bone and gingival contour.