Positive end-expiratory pressure applied to the dependent lung during one-lung ventilation improves oxygenation and respiratory mechanics in patients with high FEV1

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to the dependent lung during one-lung ventilation, taking into consideration underlying lung function in order to select responders to PEEP. METHODS: Forty-six patients undergoing open-chest thoracic surgical procedures were studied in an operating room of a university hospital. Patients were randomized to receive zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) or 10 cmH2O of PEEP to the dependent lung during one-lung ventilation in lateral decubitus. The patients were stratified according to preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) as an indicator of lung function (below or above 72%). Oxygenation was measured in the supine position, in the lateral decubitus with an open chest, and after 20 min of ZEEP or PEEP. The respiratory system pressure-volume curve of the dependent hemithorax was measured in supine and open-chest lateral decubitus positions with a super-syringe. RESULTS: Application of 10 cmH2O of PEEP resulted in a significant increase in PaO2 (P < 0.05). This did not occur in ZEEP group, considered as a time matched control. PEEP improved oxygenation only in patients with high FEV1 (from 11.6+/-4.8 to 15.3+/-7.1 kPa, P < 0.05). There was no significant change in the low FEV1 group. Dependent hemithorax compliance decreased in lateral decubitus, more in patients with high FEV1 (P < 0.05). PEEP improved compliance to a greater extent in patients with high FEV1 (from 33.6+/-3.6 to 48.4+/-3.9 mLcmH2O(-1), P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: During one-lung ventilation in lateral decubitus, PEEP applied to the dependent lung significantly improves oxygenation and respiratory mechanics in patients with rather normal lungs as assessed by high FEV1.     

Lateral Positioning With Differential Lung Ventilation and Unilateral PEEP Following Unilateral Acid Aspiration in the Dog

Body position can significantly alter the efficiency of gas exchange following unilateral lung injury. We systematically examined three positions during differential lung ventilation with unilateral positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) following unilateral hydrochloric acid aspiration in the dog. Twelve mongrel dogs were intubated with a double-lumen endobronchial tube and mechanically ventilated with a microcomputer-controlled pair of ventilators. A tidal volume of 7.5 ml/kg was delivered to each lung. The PaCO2 was maintained at 4.67 kPa. A unilateral injury was induced with an injection of 0.1 N hydrochloric acid (2.5 ml/kg) into one lumen of the endobronchial tube. 0.984 kPa PEEP was applied to the injured lung and the dogs were placed sequentially in one of three positions (supine, lateral decubitus with injured lung non-dependent, and lateral decubitus with injured lung dependent) for 1 h apiece. There was no significant difference between the three positions with regard to PaO2 (F (2, 10) = 1.60, P = 0.25) of venous admixture (F (2, 10) = 0.49, P = 0.63). Our data indicated that position did not alter oxygenation. This was probably due to the use of differential ventilation with unilateral PEEP which eliminated redistribution of ventilation between the two lungs and minimized position-dependent changes in pulmonary blood flow.     

Selective PEEP in Acute Bilateral Lung Disease. Effect on Patients in the Lateral Posture

Seven patients with acute respiratory failure due to diffuse and fairly uniform lung disease were studied during mechanical ventilation in the lateral decubital position with: (a) zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) through a double-lumen oro-bronchial tube to permit a recording of the ventilation to each lung; (b) bilateral positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 1.2 kPa, with maintenance of ventilation distribution between lungs as observed during ZEEP; (c) selective PEEP of 1.2 kPa, applied to the dependent lung only, with ventilation as during ZEEP; and (d) conventional PEEP of 1.2 kPa applied to both lungs through a single-lumen tube, with free distribution of ventilation between the lungs. During ZEEP, 69% of ventilation was distributed to the non-dependent and 31% to the dependent lung; cardiac output was 6.51 X min-1, venous admixture (QS/QT) 40% and arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) 8.3 kPa. With bilateral PEEP, functional residual capacity (FRC) increased by 0.331, cardiac output was reduced to 5.11 X min-1 and venous admixture to 32%. PaO2 increased to 10.1 kPa. With selective PEEP the dependent lung FRC increased by 0.211 and the FRC of the non-dependent lung decreased by 0.081. Cardiac output increased to 6.11 X min-1, which was no longer significantly different from that during ZEEP. Venous admixture remained at the same level as with bilateral PEEP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The influence of body position and differential ventilation on lung dimensions and atelectasis formation in anaesthetized man

The effects of body position and anaesthesia with mechanical ventilation on thoracic dimensions and atelectasis formation were studied by means of computerized tomography in 14 patients. Induction of anaesthesia in the supine position reduced the cross-sectional area for both lungs and caused atelectasis formation in dependent lung regions in 4/5 patients. Conventional ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) increased thoracic dimensions and reduced, but did not eliminate, the atelectatic areas. The vertical diameters of both lungs were smaller in the lateral position as compared to the supine position (16.7 vs 10.4 cm in the left lung and 17.3 vs 12.8 cm in the right lung). The lateral positioning also caused a large reduction of the atelectatic area in the non-dependent lung. Differential ventilation with selective PEEP to the dependent lung eliminated (3/8 patients) or reduced (5/8 patients) dependent lung atelectasis. It can be concluded that lung geometry is altered in the lateral position: the shape of the lung makes the vertical diameter of each lung less in the lateral position, compared to the supine position. The atelectatic areas are mainly located in the dependent lung in the lateral position, and these atelectatic areas could be further reduced by selective PEEP to this lung.     

Prospective,randomized, controlled evaluation of the preventive effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on patient oxygenation during one-lung ventilation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This prospective, randomized, controlled study evaluated the effects on oxygenation by applying a selective and patient-specific value of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to the dependent lung during one-lung ventilation. METHODS: Fifty patients undergoing thoracic surgery under combined epidural/general anaesthesia were randomly allocated to receive zero PEEP (Group ZEEP, n = 22), or the preventive application of PEEP, optimized on the best thoracopulmonary compliance (Group PEEP, n = 28). Patients' lungs were mechanically ventilated with the same setting during two- and one-lung ventilation (FiO2 = 0.5; VT = 9mL kg(-1), inspiratory :expiratory time = 1 : 1, inspiratory pause = 10%). RESULTS: Lung-chest wall compliance decreased in both groups during one-lung ventilation, but patients of Group PEEP had 10% higher values than patients with no end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) applied--Group ZEEP (P < 0.05). During closed chest one-lung ventilation, the PaO2 : FiO2 ratio was lower in Group PEEP (232 +/- 88) than in Group ZEEP (339 +/- 97) (P < 0.05); but no further differences were reported throughout the study. No differences were reported between the two groups in the need for 100% oxygen ventilation (10 patients of Group ZEEP (45%) and 14 patients of Group PEEP (50%) (P = 0.78)) or re-inflation of the operated lung during surgery (two patients of Group ZEEP (9%) and three patients of Group PEEP (10%) (P = 0.78)). Postanaesthesia care unit discharge required 48 min (25th-75th percentiles: 32-58 min) in Group PEEP and 45 min (30-57 min) in Group ZEEP (P = 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: The selective application of PEEP to the dependent, non-operated lung increases the lung-chest wall compliance during one-lung ventilation, but does not improve patient oxygenation.     

Differential ventilation and selective positive end-expiratory pressure: effects on patients with acute bilateral lung disease

Eleven patients with acute respiratory failure due to diffuse, bilateral lung disease were treated according to a new ventilation concept. The patients were intubated with a double-lumen catheter and positioned in the lateral decubital posture. With two synchronized ventilators, each lung received half of the tidal volume (VT), in accordance with its presumed perfusion (differential ventilation--DV), and the end-expiratory pressure was increased locally in the dependent lung (selective PEEP). DV with and without selective PEEP was compared with conventional ventilation with free distribution of VT, with and without PEEP applied to both lungs. The major findings were that DV with a selective PEEP of 12 cmH2O to the dependent lung decreased venous admixture by 38% (P less than 0.01) in comparison with conventional ventilation with no PEEP. Furthermore, it was found that selective PEEP, in contrast to general PEEP, had no deleterious effect on cardiac output. Consequently, DV with selective PEEP increased arterial oxygen tension by 23% (P less than 0.05) compared with general PEEP and by 46% (P less than 0.001) in comparison with conventional ventilation with no PEEP.     

Ventilation-perfusion relationships and atelectasis formation in the supine and lateral positions during conventional mechanical and differential ventilation

Patients without respiratory symptoms were studied awake and during general anesthesia with mechanical ventilation prior to elective surgery. Ventilation-perfusion (VA/Q) relationships, gas exchange and atelectasis formation were studied during five different conditions: 1) supine, awake; 2) supine during anesthesia with conventional mechanical ventilation (CV); 3) in the left lateral position during CV; 4) as 3) but with 10 cm of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and 5) as 3) but using differential ventilation with selective PEEP (DV + SPEEP) to the dependent lung. Atelectatic areas and increases of shunt blood flow and blood flow to regions with low VA/Q ratios appeared after induction of anesthesia and CV. With the patients in the lateral position, further VA/Q mismatch with a fall in PaO2 and increased dead space ventilation was observed. Atelectatic lung areas were still present, although the total atelectatic area was slightly decreased. Some of the effects caused by the lateral position could be counteracted by adding PEEP. Perfusion of regions with low VA/Q ratios and venous admixture were then diminished, while PaO2 was slightly increased; shunt blood flow and dead space ventilation were essentially unchanged. During CV + PEEP, there was a decrease in cardiac output, compared to CV in the lateral position. DV + SPEEP was more effective than CV + PEEP in decreasing shunt flow and increasing PaO2 in the lateral position; in addition to this, cardiac output was not affected.     

Diazepam sedation reduces functional residual capacity and alters the distribution of ventilation in man

We measured ventilation and static lung volumes in five fit volunteers in the right lateral decubitus position, while they were fully awake and while sedated with diazepam. We also assessed the distributions of ventilation and perfusion in the lungs, using inhalations and intravenous injections of xenon-127. Diazepam, 0.04 mg . kg-1, was administered every three to five minutes as required to induce and maintain a state of sedation which was moderately heavy. Total doses ranged from 0.16 to 0.38 mg . kg-1. Sedation did not alter minute ventilation, but reduced tidal volume, increased breathing frequency and reduced functional residual capacity slightly. Sedation also diminished the normal gradient of ventilation from non-dependent to dependent regions of the lungs. Spontaneous episodes of very small tidal volume breathing during sedation were associated with a marked reduction or cessation of ventilation of the most dependent region of the lungs. There were no sedation-related changes in the distribution of perfusion. These effects of moderately heavy sedation may contribute to the hypoxaemia and impairment of pulmonary gas exchange often present during recovery from general anaesthesia.     

Lung and Chest Wall Mechanics during Differential Ventilation with Selective PEEP

Eight patients free from cardio-pulmonary disease and with a mean age of 46 years were studied during general anaesthesia in the lateral position. Measurements of hemithoracic mechanics were made during four different modes of ventilation: 1. Conventional ventilation (free distribution of ventilation) with no positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (CV), 2. differential ventilation (50% of ventilation to each lung) with no PEEP (DV:0), and 3 and 4. DV with selective PEEP of 0.8 and 1.6 kPa, respectively, to the dependent lung only (DV:8, DV:16). During CV, 60% of ventilation was distributed to the non-dependent lung. Non-dependent hemithoracic compliance was 64% greater and inspiratory resistance 39% lower than those of the dependent hemithorax. No significant differences between the two hemithoraces were noted during DV:0, but on application of selective PEEP the compliance of the dependent hemithorax increased and its resistance decreased. With DV:16, the compliances of the two hemithoraces were essentially equal, as were their resistances. Selective PEEP caused a larger volume increase in the dependent lung than general PEEP. Selective PEEP reduced the volume of the non-dependent lung but only by 1/3 of the simultaneous increase in that of the dependent lung. Oesophageal pressure increased only slightly on selective inflation of the dependent lung, and remained negative within the 21 volume range studied. It is suggested that the altered mechanics of the dependent lung during selective PEEP result in a more even distribution of the inspired gas within that lung.     

Distribution of Inspired Gas to Each Lung in Anesthetized Human Subjects

The distribution of ventilation in man during halothane anesthesia was studied in a two-compartment lung model in which each lung was ventilated separately by means of a double-lumen tracheal tube. Eight subjects were studied prior to scheduled surgery. Tidal volume distribution was even between the lungs in the supine position (horizontal distribution) as was distribution of dynamic lung compliance, resistance and dead space. The vertical distribution was assessed when the patient was in the left lateral position. Dependent dynamic lung compliance and dead space were lower and lung resistance was higher than in the non-dependent lung. These factors favoured a non-dependent lung ventilation and, moreover, caused a re-distribution from dependent to non-dependent lung during an end-inspiratory pause (EIP), thus increasing the inhomogeneity of ventilation. The application of a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 10 cmH₂O improved dependent ventilation and abolished redistribution between the lungs. In conclusion, uneven distribution of dynamic lung compliance and lung resistance causes inhomogeneous ventilation distribution, favouring the non-dependent lung. An EIP enhances and a PEEP reduces the inhomogeneity of ventilation.     

Regional Differences in Lung Function during Anaesthesia and Intensive Care: Clinical Implications

Anaesthesia and most frequently acute respiratory failure are accompanied by a lowered functional residual capacity (FRC). This lowering promotes airway closure in dependent lung units and forces ventilation to non-dependent regions. Perfusion, on the other hand, is forced towards dependent lung units. A ventilation-perfusion mismatch is created and hypoxaemia may develop. General PEEP counters airway closure, but impedes cardiac output and forces perfusion further to dependent regions. In addition, barotrauma may occur. Improved matching of ventilation and perfusion can be achieved by: (1) positioning the subject in the lateral posture; (2) ventilating each lung separately in proportion to its perfusion (differential ventilation); and (3) applying PEEP only to the dependent lung (selective PEEP). Because of less overall intrathoracic pressure and lung expansion, interference with the total lung blood flow and the danger of barotrauma should be less than with general PEEP. Improved gas exchange with a 50-100% increase in PaO2 has been observed in a limited number of patients with acute bilateral lung disease studied so far during differential ventilation and selective PEEP.     

不同通气方式对小儿心内直视手术期间Crs改变的初步观察

目的 小儿心内直视手术麻醉期间应用ＰＥＥＰ和转流期间肺泡低压,寻找此类手术麻醉中改善肺表面活性物质（ＰＳ）生成和呼吸系统总顺应性（Ｃｒｓ）的途径。方法 ４０例左向右分流型先心病患儿随机分为４组,Ｉ组为ＩＰＰＶ通气组,ＩＩ组ＰＥＥＰ应用组,Ⅲ组为ＩＰＰＶ通气且转流期间肺泡低压组,ＩＶ组为ＰＥＥＰ及转流期间肺泡低压组,测定各组各时点的Ｃｒｓ及ＰＳ生化指标,结果 Ｉ组手术结束时Ｃｒｓ,饱和磷／总磷及饱和     

The influence of positive end-expiratory pressure on stroke volume variation and central blood volume during open and closed chest conditions.

OBJECTIVE: Intermittent positive pressure ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) affect cardiac preload. Their effect is dependent on chest wall compliance. This study compares the effects of intermittent positive pressure ventilation and PEEP on stroke volume variation and central blood volume during open and closed chest conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs (25-40 kg) were studied. Central blood volume was assessed using global end-diastolic volume and right ventricular end-diastolic volume measured by thermodilution. Further, left and right ventricular stroke volume variations were determined with ultrasonic flow probes placed around the pulmonary artery and ascending aorta, respectively. Measurements were performed during mechanical ventilation without and with PEEP (15 cmH(2)O) in open and closed chest conditions. RESULTS: With the chest closed mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, stroke volume, global end-diastolic volume, and right ventricular end-diastolic volume were significantly lower when compared to open chest conditions. Concomitantly, right ventricular, but not left ventricular stroke volume variation increased significantly. Applying PEEP led to a significant reduction of cardiac output, stroke volume and right ventricular end-diastolic volume, with a concomitant increase in left and right ventricular stroke volume variation both during open and closed chest conditions (all P-values<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that PEEP increases right and left ventricular stroke volume variation both during open and closed chest conditions. The concomitant reduction of right ventricular end-diastolic volume further indicates that PEEP has a preload reductive effect during open chest conditions, too.     

Pulmonary air trapping during two-lung and one-lung ventilation

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the magnitude of pulmonary air trapping during routine thoracic surgery and single-lung transplantation. DESIGN: Prospective study on consecutive patients. SETTING: Single institution, university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Sixteen patients with no or moderate obstructive lung disease undergoing routine thoracic surgery (group 1), six patients with severe emphysema (group 2), and six patients with severe fibrosis (group 3) undergoing single-lung transplantation. INTERVENTIONS: Occlusion maneuver timed at the end of expiration to measure auto-positive end-expiratory pressure (auto-PEEP) and trapped volume (delta FRC). The maneuver was performed during two-lung ventilation in supine (2LV supine) and lateral decubitus (2LV lateral) positions and during one-lung ventilation (OLV) in lateral decubitus position. At the same time, airway pressures and PaO2 measurements were performed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In group 1, consistent values of auto-PEEP and delta FRC occurred only during OLV: 4.8 +/- 2.5 cm H2O and 109 +/- 61 mL (mean +/- standard deviation). In group 2, auto-PEEP and delta FRC values were 11.7 +/- 6.9 cm H2O and 355 +/- 125 mL during 2LV supine, 8.8 +/- 5.7 cm H2O and 320 +/- 122 mL during 2LV lateral, and 15.9 +/- 3.9 cm H2O and 284 +/- 45 mL during OLV. In group 3, pulmonary air trapping was low. For the three groups together, auto-PEEP and delta FRC (p < 0.0001) related inversely to the ratio of forced expired volume in 1 second (FEV1) to forced vital capacity (FVC) expressed in percent (FEV1/FVC%) during OLV. In contrast, there was no correlation between PaO2 and auto-PEEP or delta FRC. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary air trapping must be suspected in patients with no or moderate obstructive lung disease during OLV and in those with severe obstructive disease as soon as 2LV is initiated.     

Differential Ventilation and Selective PEEP During Anaesthesia in the Lateral Decubitus Posture

The potential of differential ventilation (DV) with selective positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) has been tested versus conventional ventilation with and without general PEEP. Gas exchange and central haemodynamics were studied in 15 subjects with no clinical or radiological signs of pulmonary disease. The rationale of the method was to ensure ventilation of the well-perfused dependent lung and to counteract airway closure within that lung. The subjects were intubated with a double-lumen catheter prior to scheduled abdominal surgery. During general anaesthesia in the lateral posture, they were given DV. The mean inspired oxygen fraction was 0.32. Fifty per cent ("even" tidal volume (VT) distribution) or 70% ("inverted" VT distribution) of the inspired volume was administered to the dependent lung. Two synchronized ventilators were used. In eight subjects DV was also combined with PEEP applied solely to the dependent lung (selective PEEP). The major findings were that DV with even VT distribution reduced venous admixture by 26% ( P <0.05) and the alveolo-arterial oxygen tension gradient (P(A-a)o2) by 30% ( P <0.05) in comparison with conventional ventilation in the lateral position. The addition of selective PEEP further reduced the P(A-a)o2 by 13%. P(A-a)o2 was consequently 43% lower than during conventional ventilation without PEEP in the lateral posture ( P <0.01). Selective PEEP also had less impact on cardiac output than general PEEP (P<0.05). It is concluded that DV with even distribution of VT and selective PEEP can reduce the P(A-a)o2 in anaesthetized lung-healthy subjects in the lateral position.     

Healthy lungs tolerate repetitive collapse and reopening during short periods of mechanical ventilation

The possible occurrence of lung damage if alveolar units are allowed to collapse and reopen breath by breath during mechanical ventilation with normal tidal volumes was investigated. Anaesthetised, paralysed, open chest rabbits were subjected to either intrathoracic negative (NEEP; n=6) or positive (PEEP; n=6) end-expiratory pressure during volume controlled mechanical ventilation. Both experimental settings were preceded by a 30 min control period and followed by a 30 min recovery period during which a PEEP of 0.2 kPa was maintained. Pao₂ and pulmonary compliance deteriorated significantly in the NEEP group during the experimental period and compared to ventilation with PEEP. Partial restoration of lung mechanics and blood gases was achieved during the recovery period. After an alveolar recruitment manoeuvre, this recovery was complete. Lung clearance studied by depositing an aerosol of technetium-99m-labelled diethylenetriamine pentaacetate (^99mTc-DTPA) in the alveoli, was significantly faster during ventilation with NEEP compared to the PEEP group ( P =0.0002) as well as the control period ( P = 0.0029). It did not recover completely during the recovery period but remained significantly faster. light microscopic histology was normal in both groups with no evidence of inflammation or epithelial disruption. We conclude that previously healthy rabbit lungs show only a transient disturbance of lung mechanics and blood gases with repetitive collapse and re-expansion. The integrity of the alveolar rnicrostructure is preserved. The disturbance in the alveolo-capillary permeability persists and may indicate surfactant related alveolo-capillary barrier dysfunction.     

Differential ventilation in bilateral lung disease

General anaesthesia and many types of acute respiratory failure are accompanied by a decrease in functional residual capacity (FRC). This reduction promotes closure of dependent airways and alveolar collapse, thus impeding ventilation of these regions. Perfusion, on the other hand, is forced towards dependent regions by lowered pulmonary vascular pressure and increased alveolar pressure. Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) inequality develops, impairing gas exchange and arterial oxygenation. Application of general positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) increases FRC and may improve gas exchange but cannot restore V/Q to normal. Differential ventilation, with equal distribution of ventilation between the lungs, and the application of PEEP solely to the dependent lung (selective PEEP) with the patient in the lateral position, improve V/Q matching and gas exchange with less impedance of cardiac output and less danger of barotrauma. This ventilation technique has proved successful in short-term experiments and in a small number of patients treated over several days.     

The effect of positive end expiratory pressure on the respiratory profile during one-lung ventilation for thoracotomy

Summary In this randomised controlled trial we examined the effects of four different levels of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP at 0, 5, 8 or 10 cmH(2)O), added to the dependent lung, on respiratory profile and oxygenation during one lung ventilation. Forty-six patients were recruited to receive one of the randomised PEEP levels during one lung ventilation. We did not find significant differences in lung compliance, intra-operative or postoperative oxygenation amongst the four different groups. However, the physiological deadspace to tidal volume ventilation ratio was significantly lower in the 8 cmH(2)O PEEP group compared with the other levels of PEEP (p < 0.0001). We concluded that the use of PEEP (< or =10 cmH(2)O) during one lung ventilation does not clinically improve lung compliance, intra-operative or postoperative oxygenation despite a statistically significant reduction in the physiological deadspace to tidal volume ratio.     

Effects of posture on the distribution of pulmonary ventilation and perfusion in children and adults.

In the adult the distributions of ventilation and of perfusion show the same directional dependence on gravity. In children, however, the distribution of ventilation in response to gravity is the reverse of that seen in adults. The aim of the current study was to determine whether perfusion showed the same reversal in children or followed the adult pattern. Distribution of perfusion was measured with intravenous technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin and distribution of ventilation with inhaled krypton-81m. Eighteen children and seven adults were studied; they had been referred for lung scanning for various respiratory problems. The effect of gravity was examined by giving aliquots of macroaggregated albumin and 81mKr by inhalation to the subject in the supine and the lateral decubitus position. Counts in the dependent lung were compared with those in the upper lung. The dependent lung in the lateral decubitus position received more of the total perfusion than it did in the supine position in seven children with a normal chest radiograph (mean 7.0%, range 4.8-10.9% more) and in 11 children with an abnormal radiograph (mean 3.4%(0.1-10.0%)). Ventilation, however, changed in the opposite direction, falling by 7.1% (-3.2% to -12.8%) in five children with a normal chest radiograph and 11.2% (-2.8% to -19.3%) in eight children with an abnormal radiograph. Fractional V/fractional Q (an index of the ventilation:perfusion ratio) decreased in the dependent lung in the children when they moved from the supine to the decubitus position. The same directional change was recorded in adults, but it was significantly less than in the children, irrespective of whether the chest radiograph was abnormal. In children and adults with various respiratory problems the effect of posture on the distribution of perfusion is similar.     

Effect of PEEP and suction via chest drain on functional residual capacity and lung compliance after surgical repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: preliminary observations in 5 patients

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is associated with pulmonary hypoplasia that limits survival. The authors' knowledge on lung mechanics and lung volumes in these patients with hypoplastic lungs is still limited. Therefore, the authors performed measurements of functional residual capacity (FRC), compliance of the respiratory system (CRS), and tidal volume in 5 full-term infants (gestational age, 38 to 40 weeks; birth weight, 2,800 to 3,530 g) before and after surgical repair of neonatal CDH. METHODS: The authors studied the influence of different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and suction via inserted ipsilateral chest tube connected to a water seal on lung volume and lung mechanics. A computerized tracer gas (SF6) washout method was used for serial measurements of FRC. Compliance of the respiratory system was determined according to insufflatory method. RESULTS: The authors found a preoperative compliance between 1.5 and 3.9 mL/kPa/kg and a preoperative FRC between 9.1 and 12.9 mL/kg indicating severe hypoplasia of the lungs in all patients. Immediately after surgical repair of CDH, compliance decreased to 85% (78% to 91%) of preoperative value, and FRC increased to 132% (110% to 150%) of preoperative value under mechanical ventilation while at 4 cm of water of PEEP and at -10 cm of water of suction via chest drain with the need of high fraction of inspired oxygen. After reduction of PEEP from 4 to 2 or 1 cm of water and lowering suction from -10 cm of water to -2 or 0 cm of water FRC decreased to 103% (80% to 122%) of preoperative value and compliance, and tidal volume improved to 135% (110% to 147%) of preoperative value resulting in increased alveolar ventilation, correction of acidosis and improvement in oxygenation. During the first days after surgery inadequate high PEEP or strong suction via chest tube drainage resulted in increase in FRC paralleled by decrease in compliance indicating overdistension of these hypoplastic lungs. CONCLUSIONS: The data show that overdistension of hypoplastic lungs in infants with CDH can be detected and excluded by repeated measurements of FRC and compliance in these critical ill infants. These data might help setting appropriate ventilator parameters, adequate suction via chest drain, and thereby improve gas exchange and outcome.