Expression of human mucin genes during normal and abnormal renal development

Human mucin genes encode large O-glycoproteins, which are expressed in various epithelial tissues. The proteins are the main components of mucus, but also might be involved in morphogenesis of or carcinogenesis in many organs. We studied the expression of human mucin genes during fetal kidney development and in malformed cystic renal diseases in 10 normal fetal kidneys and 12 malformed kidneys by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical analysis. MUC1, MUC3, and MUC6 were expressed in normal fetal kidney. MUC1 was expressed from 7.5 weeks of gestation in the metanephric blastema and throughout fetal life in the ureteric buds, distal convoluted tubules, and collecting ducts. MUC3 was expressed weakly in immature tubules from 8 weeks of gestation, after which it was expressed weakly and focally in the proximal convoluted tubules. MUC6 was expressed at 9.5 weeks of gestation in the tips of the ureteric buds and later in the collecting ducts. In malformative cystic diseases, only MUC1 expression was retained; no expression of MUC6 and MUC3 was observed. These results implicate human mucin genes (MUC1, MUC3, and MUC6) in renal morphogenesis processes.     

Mucins and mucin-associated carbohydrate antigens expression in gastric carcinoma cell lines

Mucins are high-molecular-mass glycoproteins with high carbohydrate content and marked heterogeneity both in the apoprotein and in the oligosaccharide side chains. Mucin genes are expressed in a regulated manner, namely in the human stomach. The first aim of the present study was to characterise the expression of mucins and mucin-associated carbohydrate antigens in seven gastric carcinoma cell lines, and to compare their expression profiles with those of normal gastric tissues and human gastric carcinomas. Secondly, we aimed to see whether or not there is an association between the expression of mucins and mucin-associated carbohydrate antigens. Our results show that mucin expression in gastric carcinoma cell lines: (a) follows in part the mucin expression profile of normal gastric mucosa and gastric carcinomas with wide expression of MUC1 and MUC5AC; (b) parallels the aberrant pattern of mucin expression observed in human gastric carcinomas with occasional expression of MUC2, MUC3, MUC4 and MUC5B; (c) does not include, at least in our series, the expression of MUC6 mucin; and (d) follows in part the differentiation pattern of the carcinomas from which the cell lines originated, keeping S-Tn expression in cell lines derived from glandular carcinomas. Our results further demonstrate that there is no apparent relationship between the mucin core proteins and the simple mucin-type or Lewis carbohydrate antigens. Received: 19 April 1999 / Accepted: 23 June 1999     

Human MUC1 mucin: a potent glandular morphogen.

Human MUC1 mucin is a high-molecular-weight transmembrane glycoprotein, which is apically expressed in the majority of glandular epithelia. During embryonic development, changes in the pattern of MUC1 mucin expression coincide with the onset of glandular differentiation. This mucin is also frequently overexpressed and aberrantly glycosylated in carcinomas. To investigate the potential role of MUC1 mucin in morphogenesis, a full length MUC1 cDNA was transfected into murine mammary adenocarcinoma (410.4) and Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells. This generated four clonal cell lines. Western blotting, FACS analysis, and immunohistochemistry confirmed expression of MUC1. All four MUC1-expressing clones demonstrated altered morphogenesis when cultured in three-dimensional type I collagen gels. While parental and vector control 410.4 cells formed compact spherical structures, the MUC1-expressing clones formed complex branching structures. Similarly, while parental and vector control MDCK cells formed small circumscribed colonies with a central lumen, the MUC1-expressing clones formed elongated tubules. MUC1 expression was also associated with reduced cellular cohesion and enhanced migration on type I collagen-coated surfaces for all except one of the clones, which expressed only low levels of MUC1 on the cell surface. These results show that MUC1 expression stimulates morphogenetic changes in two distinct epithelial cell lines. Taken together with previous observations on MUC1 expression in embryonic development and carcinomas, this finding suggests that MUC1 may induce changes in tissue architecture in both normal development and cancer.     

Mucinous bronchioloalveolar carcinomas display a specific pattern of mucin gene expression among primary lung adenocarcinomas

Lung adenocarcinomas are heterogeneous clinically and histologically. Expression of the mucin genes was analyzed as a molecular marker of glandular cytodifferentiation in primary lung adenocarcinomas. Expression was correlated with histopathologic subtypes of World Health Organization classification with the aim of investigating the histogenesis of primary lung adenocarcinomas. Thirty-four primary lung adenocarcinomas were examined by in situ hybridization for mucin gene expression (MUC1-4, MUC5AC, MUC5B, MUC6-7) and by immunohistochemistry for MUC5AC and MUC5B apomucin expression. Mucinous bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) had a homogeneous pattern of mucin gene expression different from those of other types of lung adenocarcinoma, involving secreted mucins (MUC5AC, MUC5B, and MUC6) and membrane-bound mucins (MUC1, MUC3, and MUC4). Non-BAC adenocarcinoma and mucinous BAC aberrantly expressed mucin genes MUC3, and MUC3 and MUC6, respectively, which are undetectable in normal fetal and adult lung. Our results show the particular phenotype of mucin gene expression in mucinous type of BACs and the heterogeneous expression of respiratory and nonrespiratory mucins in the other types. This finding supports the theory of a common progenitor cell with the potential of multicellular differentiation. From a practical point of view, the aberrant expression of MUC3 and MUC6 could serve as a diagnostic marker in the management of the mucinous type of bronchioloalveolar carcinomas. HUM PATHOL 32:274-281.     

Altered mucin expression is a field change that accompanies mucinous (colloid) breast carcinoma histogenesis

Mucinous carcinomas of the breast, so-called colloid carcinomas, exhibit better prognoses than their nonmucinous breast counterparts. This biological difference exhibited by mucinous breast carcinomas prompted us to examine the relationship of mucin expression to colloid carcinoma histogenesis. We studied 50 colloid carcinomas, 50 noncolioid cancers, and 50 normal breasts by hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) and Alcian blue staining, mucin immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization with a battery of MUC riboprobes, and ancillary digital image analysis. We observed luminal mucin in normal ducts in 80% of colloid carcinomas compared with 10% of noncolloid carcinomas and 6% of normal breasts (P < .01). In the cases of colloid carcinoma that showed mucin-filled ducts, luminal mucin was observed in 40% of the normal ducts and acini, 40% to 75% of the ducts involved by hyperplasia, atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), respectively, and in 50% of the co-incidental areas of cysts (mucoceles), adenosis, fibroadenoma, and intraductal papilloma (P < .01). Immunohistochemistry showed that colloid carcinomas showed strong MUC2 cytoplasmic immunoreactivity and decreased MUC1 immunoreactivity compared with noncolloid carcinomas. In situ hybridization studies indicated fivefold increased MUC2 signals and twofold increased MUC5 signals within adjacent and remote normal epithelium in only the colloid carcinoma cases (P < .01; P < .05). In these cases of colloid carcinoma, these increased MUC2 and MUC5 signals were also observed in areas of hyperplasia, ADH, DCIS, and invasive carcinoma. In contrast, the noncolloid carcinomas showed fivefold increased MUC1 signals but no increases in MUC2 or MUC5. In mixed colloid/noncolloid carcinomas, the colloid areas had identical mucin expression patterns as the pure colloid carcinomas, but there was a loss of MUC2 and MUC5 expression and a gain of MUC1 expression in the noncolloid areas that was therefore identical to the pattern observed in pure noncolloid carcinoma. In this study, we conclude that the altered expression of mucin so characteristic of colloid carcinoma is also a field change present in adjacent and remote normal breast epithelium.     

Differential expression of MUC1, MUC2, and MUC5AC in carcinomas of various sites: an immunohistochemical study

We studied immunohistochemical expression of MUC1, MUC2, and MUC5AC in 194 carcinomas of different primary sites to determine whether differential expression patterns could be used to distinguish different carcinomas. MUC1 was expressed by most (except adrenocortical and hepatocellular carcinomas). MUC2 was expressed infrequently (positive immunoreactivity primarily in tumors of gastrointestinal origin). MUC5AC was expressed by most pancreatic ductal and endocervical adenocarcinomas and a variable number of tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. A MUC1+/MUC2-/MUC5AC- immunophenotype was observed in most breast, lung, kidney, bladder, endometrial, and ovarian carcinomas; MUC1+/MUC2-/MUC5AC+ was characteristic of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and cholangiocarcinomas. Adrenocortical and hepatocellular carcinomas were negative for all mucins. Carcinomas of gastrointestinal origin exhibited variable expression of each mucin examined and no consistent immunoreactivity pattern. Many carcinomas can exhibit distinct MUC1, MUC2, and MUC5AC expression patterns, which might be valuable diagnostically in specific settings (eg, distinguishing cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma or renal from adrenocortical carcinoma). However the overlapping and heterogeneous patterns of MUC1, MUC2, and MUC5AC expression observed in many tumors, particularly those of gastrointestinal origin, preclude use of these markers in the routine immunohistochemical assessment of carcinomas of an unknown primary site.     

Immunohistochemical study of the expression of MUC5AC and MUC6 in breast carcinomas and adjacent breast tissues

AIM: To study the protein expression patterns of MUC5AC and MUC6 in normal and diseased breast tissues and to compare their expression with that of a mucin (MUC1) normally expressed in mammary tissues. METHODS: Formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded tissue from 69 cases of invasive breast carcinoma and surrounding breast tissue was studied immunohistochemically with monoclonal antibodies against MUC1 (SM3), MUCSAC (CLH2), and MUC6 (CLH6), using the avidin-biotin-peroxidase method. RESULTS: MUC5AC was detected in five of 68 cases of invasive carcinoma including one of three cases of pure colloid carcinoma. MUCSAC expression in the adjacent normal breast epithelium was present in one of 29 cases and in one of two cases of ductal carcinoma in situ. None of 15 cases of ductal hyperplasia without atypia was positive for MUCSAC. MUC6 was present in 15 of 65 cases of invasive carcinoma, in four of 29 cases of normal adjacent epithelium, two of 15 cases of ductal hyperplasia without atypia, and one of two cases of ductal carcinoma in situ. MUC1 immunoreactivity detected by the SM3 antibody was present in 50 of the 67 cases of invasive carcinoma, but expression was also detected in benign epithelium. All invasive carcinomas expressing MUCSAC were positive for MUC1 and four were positive for MUC6. No significant association was found between the expression of these mucins and tumour size, histological grade, node status, oestrogen receptor status, p53 positivity, or c-ErbB-2 overexpression. CONCLUSIONS: This study documents the expression of two different mucins (MUCSAC and MUC6) not described as being expressed by normal breast tissues in a minority of breast carcinomas, as well as in normal and hyperplastic epithelium. Although the role of mucins in malignant transformation and the progression of breast cancer is not well understood, in some cases, there is probably an upregulation of several genes that encode distinct mucin proteins.     

Expression of mucins (MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC and MUC6) in mucinous carcinoma of the breast: comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma

AIMS: Mucinous carcinoma of the breast usually shows less frequent lymph node metastasis and more favourable outcome compared with invasive ductal carcinoma. The aim of this study is to compare the expression profiles of several mucins in mucinous carcinomas and invasive ductal carcinomas to gain insight into the relationship between the less aggressive biological nature of mucinous carcinoma and the role of mucins. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the expression profiles of MUC1 (membrane-bound mucin) of different glycoforms (from non-glycosylated form to fully glycosylated form), MUC2 (intestinal type secretory mucin), MUC5AC (gastric surface type secretory mucin) and MUC6 (gastric pyloric gland type secretory mucin) in 17 mucinous carcinomas and 46 invasive ductal carcinomas using immunohistochemistry. Various glycoforms of MUC1 were expressed frequently in both mucinous carcinomas (65-100%) and invasive ductal carcinomas (92-100%), although non-glycosylated MUC1 (MUC1/CORE) and fully glycosylated MUC1 (MUC1/HMFG-1) showed significantly lower expression rates in mucinous carcinomas compared with those in invasive ductal carcinomas. The expression rates of MUC2 (94%) and MUC6 (71%) in mucinous carcinomas were significantly higher than those of MUC2 (15%) and MUC6 (15%) in invasive ductal carcinomas. There was no significant difference in the expression rate of MUC5AC in mucinous carcinomas (12%) and that in invasive ductal carcinomas (4%). CONCLUSIONS: The expression rate of MUC1/CORE and MUC1/HMFG-1, which is related to poor prognosis in the gastric and colorectal cancers, is low in mucinous carcinomas. The high expression rate of gel-forming secretory mucins (MUC2 and MUC6) in mucinous carcinoma suggests that high production of these types of mucins may act as a barrier to cancerous extension resulting in their less aggressive biological behaviour.     

Expression of MUC1, Thomsen-Friedenreich-related antigens, and cytokeratin 19 in human renal cell carcinomas and tubular clear cell lesions

The expression of MUC1, MUC2, mucin-associated Thomsen-Friedenreich-related antigens (TF, sialosyl-TF, Tn, and sialosyl-Tn), and cytokeratin 19 (CK19) was systematically investigated in situ in 58 resected human kidney tumours, surrounding tissue of normal appearance, and two normal kidneys obtained at autopsy, using monoclonal antibodies. In kidney tissues of normal appearance, TF, s-TF, MUC1 and CK19 were positive in distal tubules and collecting ducts but negative in proximal tubules. In contrast, MUC2, Tn, and s-Tn were negative throughout the normal renal tubular system. Almost all renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) showed strong immunoreactivity for MUC1, but all were negative for MUC2. Some RCCs expressed TF, Tn, s-Tn, and CK19. In addition, the immunomorphological characteristics of the majority of clear-cell RCCs and clear/granular RCCs with anti-MUC1 and anti-CK 19 closely resembled those of the collecting duct and the distal tubule rather than the proximal tubule. In the renal tissue of otherwise normal appearance adjacent to clear-cell RCCs and clear/granular RCCs, clear cells with excessive storage of glycogen were often found in the collecting duct system, but only rarely in the proximal tubules. These results suggest that the majority of clear-cell RCCs and clear/granular RCCs may originate from the collecting duct system. Received: 24 August 1999 / Accepted: 30 August 1999     

Immunohistochemical distribution of vitamin B12 R-binder in renal cell carcinoma

Summary Renal cell carcinomas and normal kidney tissues were examined for the expression of vitamin B₁₂ R-binder by the indirect immunoperoxidase method. In normal kidney tissue, the presence of the vitamin B₁₂ R-binder was shown to be confined to the straight portion (pars recta) of proximal tubules. Seven of the 38 cases of renal cell carcinoma (18%) expressed the vitamin B₁₂ R-binder antigen. This provides a further evidence of the proximal tubular nature of renal cell carcinoma, and suggests that a small proportion of renal cell carcinomas originate from the straight portion of the renal proximal tubules.     

The mucin expression profile of endometrial carcinoma and correlation with clinical-pathologic parameters.

Mucin expression patterns have been studied in tumors from various sites. Previous studies have shown an association of MUC1 with poor prognosis and MUC2 and MUC5AC with a mucinous phenotype. The pattern of mucin expression in endometrial carcinomas has not been documented in a large series. We determined the mucin expression profile in endometrial carcinomas and evaluated the relationship between mucin expression and clinical-pathologic parameters. A tissue microarray of 310 cases of endometrial carcinoma with known clinical outcome was constructed from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded donor blocks using two 0.6 mm cores from each tumor. Sections were stained with monoclonal antibodies against MUC1, MUC2, MUC4, MUC5AC, and MUC6. Staining was considered positive if greater than or equal to 5% of cells stained positively in either core. Mucin expression was correlated with tumor type, histologic grade, International Federation Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, lymph node involvement, depth of myometrial invasion, patient age, ethnicity, and clinical outcome. MUC1 was expressed in 267/310 (86.1%) of endometrial carcinomas, MUC2 in 2/310 (0.6%), MUC4 in 73/310 (23.5%), MUC5AC in 1/310 (0.3%), and MUC6 in 4/310 (1.2%). Endometrioid endometrial carcinoma showed a higher rate of MUC1 expression than nonendometrioid endometrial carcinoma (227/258, 88.0% vs. 39/52, 75.0%, P=0.01). No significant differences in any of the mucins were noted among the other end points evaluated. Mucin expression did not correlate with tumor grade, stage, or patient outcome.     

Expression of MUC1 and MUC2 mucin gene products in Barrett's metaplasia, dysplasia and adenocarcinoma: an immunopathological study with clinical correlation

AIMS: Changes in the histochemical characteristics of the surface epithelial mucins is the hallmark of Barrett's metaplasia. The study investigated the pattern of expression of MUC1 and MUC2 mucin gene products in Barrett's metaplasia, dysplasia and adenocarcinoma as possible indicators of increased malignant potential. METHODS AND RESULTS: Tissue sections from 51 patients with Barrett's intestinal metaplasia, nine with dysplasia (three indefinite) and 28 resected adenocarcinomas were stained with monoclonal antibodies to MUC1 and MUC2. The majority of the patients were men (70/88, 80%) who were treated over a period of 3 years. None of the patients with dysplasia or carcinoma were under surveillance at the time of presentation. All 51 biopsies with Barrett's metaplasia expressed MUC2 and MUC1 was consistently absent. Neither MUC1 or MUC2 were expressed in the dysplastic epithelium whether in its pure form (6/6) or when associated with carcinoma (26/28) (P < 0.005). Three biopsies which were initially classified as high-grade dysplasia expressed MUC1 and these turned out to be carcinomas on further investigations. MUC1 was also expressed in 12/28 (43%) of the adenocarcinomas and majority of these were poorly differentiated stage 3 tumours (P < 0.05). MUC2 was only positive in mucin-secreting carcinomas (4/28; 14%) irrespective of the tumour stage. CONCLUSION: Despite the large number of patients with Barrett's metaplasia and carcinoma, very few patients presented with dysplasia, implying that Barrett's oesophagus is a silent disease in the community presenting late as carcinoma. The study has demonstrated aberrant expression of MUC2 (an intestinal mucin) in Barrett's metaplasia and this expression is lost when the cells become dysplastic. The lack of MUC1 in dysplastic epithelium and its expression in carcinoma could be utilized as a marker which could differentiate dysplasia from carcinoma in mucosal biopsies. Furthermore, expression of MUC1 in advanced stage oesophageal cancers (as in breast cancer) suggests an unfavourable prognosis.     

MUC1 expression is correlated with nuclear grade and tumor progression in pT1 renal clear cell carcinoma

We studied, by immunohistochemical analysis, the expression of MUC1 and epithelial membrane antigen in 44 stage pT1 renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). Six patients had a metastatic evolution. The percentage of stained cells was determined for each tumor. All tumors and normal adjacent renal parenchyma were stained. In normal kidney, distal convoluted tubules and collecting ducts stained strongly with an apical distribution. In tumors, there was a significant statistical correlation of the MUC1 expression level with the nuclear grade and with tumor progression. High-grade tumors had more stained cells than did low-grade tumors. Metastatic tumors also were more stained than nonmetastatic lesions. By using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test, we observed that patients with fewer than 10% of stained cells had no metastatic evolution. In contrast, patients with 70% or more stained cells had significantly lower metastasis-free survival rates. We conclude that MUC1 is expressed in RCC and is associated with tumor progression in pT1 RCC.     

Phenotypic alterations of mucins and cytokeratins during gallbladder carcinogenesis

In order to evaluate the significance of altered expression of mucin and cytokeratin during gallbladder carcinogenesis, we characterized the expressional profiles of MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC6, CK7 and CK20 in 33 normal mucosa, 31 adenomas, 55 dysplasias and 131 carcinomas of the gallbladder. In normal gallbladder mucosa, the expressions of MUC5AC and MUC6 were diffuse and MUC1 expression was absent. However, in adenomas, dysplasias and carcinomas, the expressions of MUC5AC and MUC6 tended to decrease, whereas MUC1 expression was elevated. MUC2 and CK20 were infrequently expressed in all of the gallbladder epithelia, but adenomas expressing MUC2 and/or CK20 were more frequently associated with carcinomas and showed a higher grade of atypia than those without these antigens. In carcinomas, MUC1 expression was related to invasive growth, lymph node metastasis and a non-papillotubular type, whereas MUC6 expression was related to non-invasive growth. CK7 was diffusely expressed in almost all lesions, but carcinomas with a loss of CK7 expression showed poor survival. In conclusion, normal gallbladder mucosa has a gastric phenotype, but during carcinogenesis and tumor progression, the gastric phenotype is gradually lost and the aberrant expression of MUC1 occurs. The intestinal phenotype is not common in the gallbladder.     

Gene expression of gastric type mucin (MUC5AC) in pancreatic tumors: its relationship with the biological behavior of the tumor

Previously it has been found that the MUC2 gene for intestinal type secretory mucin is highly expressed in intraductal papillary mucinous tumors (IPMT), which are characterized by non-invasive growth and a favorable outcome. In contrast, MUC2 mRNA is rarely expressed in invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC), which have poor outcomes. The gastric type secretory mucin, MUC5AC, is strongly expressed in the surface mucous cells of gastric mucosa. As both MUC2 and MUC5AC mucins share the characteristics of forming highly viscous gels, it is expected that not only MUC2 mucin expression but also MUC5AC mucin expression may be associated with a favorable prognosis in patients with pancreatic tumors. MUC5AC mucin gene expression was examined in 24 cases of IPMT and 38 cases of IDC by in situ hybridization using a digoxigenin-labeled oligonucleotide. The results were compared with MUC2 mucin gene expression. Neither MUC5AC mRNA nor MUC2 mRNA was detected in normal pancreatic tissues. MUC5AC mRNA was expressed in 20 of 24 cases of IPMT (83%) and in five of 38 cases of IDC (13%). In contrast, MUC2 mRNA was expressed in 14 of 24 cases of IPMT (58%) and in none of the 38 cases of IDC (0%). The expression rates of MUC5AC mRNA and MUC2 mRNA in IPMT were significantly higher than those in IDC (P< 0.001, respectively). Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors are characterized by three histological types: (i) villous dark cell type; (ii) papillary clear cell type; and (iii) compact cell type. The villous dark cell type generally expressed both MUC5AC+ and MUC2+ genes. Alternatively, the papillary clear cell type and the compact cell type usually showed MUC5AC+ and MUC2- expression. Patients with MUC5AC mRNA expression had a significantly better survival prognosis than those with no MUC5AC mRNA expression (P< 0.005). In conclusion, MUC5AC gene expression occurs in a majority of IPMT cases, even in those with no MUC2 production. MUC5AC expression can be     

Expression of MUC2 epithelial mucin in breast carcinoma.

AIMS--To examine the expression of the MUC2 epithelial mucin in breast carcinoma; to relate this to patient survival. METHODS--Sections from 210 breast carcinomas were stained with the anti-MUC2 core protein monoclonal antibody, 4F1, using an immunoperoxidase technique. The proportion of tumour cells positively stained and the localisation and intensity of any staining were recorded. Expression of MUC2 was compared with histological type and grade, tumour size, presence of nodal metastases, presence of oestrogen receptors, and menopausal status. The prognostic value of MUC2 expression was examined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS--MUC2 mucin was detected in 19% of cases of invasive carcinoma, in 11% of cases of carcinoma in situ, where present, but very rarely in adjacent normal breast epithelium. Presence of MUC2 was significantly associated with a shorter disease free interval (p < 0.05), although the observed difference in duration of overall survival was not significant. CONCLUSIONS--The MUC2 detected in breast carcinoma may be underglycosylated or staining may represent detection of the protein core before the completion of glycosylation. The virtual absence of 4F1 reactivity in normal breast epithelium suggests that, unlike the MUC1 mucin, the MUC2 mucin is not highly expressed by these cells. The mechanism by which expression of MUC2 affects the biology of breast tumours is unclear, although expression may be a reflection of general derepression of genes during tumour progression.