Bone Mineral Density and Serum Biochemical Predictors of Bone Loss in Patients with CKD on Dialysis

Background

and objectives Use of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is controversial for diagnosing bone loss in CKD patients on dialysis. The alternative quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is expensive and requires high radiation exposure. This study compared the two techniques and evaluated serum biochemical parameters for prediction of bone loss.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements

This prospective study enrolled patients from dialysis centers throughout Kentucky. BMD of the spine and hip was measured at baseline and after 1 year by DXA and QCT. Customary and novel serum biochemical parameters were obtained at the same times, including calcium, phosphorus, whole and intact parathyroid hormone, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b, Dickkopf-1, fibroblast growth factor, and sclerostin. Rates of detection of osteoporosis by DXA and QCT were compared. Correlations were calculated between baseline biochemical parameters and BMD at baseline and changes over 1 year. Multivariable regression was performed to adjust for age, sex, body mass index, and race.

Results

Eighty-one patients completed the study (mean age=52.6±12.3 years, 56% men, 53% African American, and median dialysis vintage=41 months). At baseline, QCT and DXA of the spine identified similar rates of osteoporosis (13.6% and 13.6%), but at the hip, DXA identified more osteoporosis (22.2% versus 13.6%). At any site and by either method, 33.3% of the patients were osteoporotic. Baseline BMD correlated with sclerostin, intact parathyroid hormone, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b, and fibroblast growth factor. At 1 year, hip QCT identified a higher number of patients experiencing bone loss (51.3%) than DXA (38.5%). After multivariable adjustment, baseline sclerostin and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b predicted bone loss measured by QCT of the hip; procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide predicted cortical spine bone gain by QCT.

Conclusions

QCT identified prospectively more bone loss at the hip than DXA. The baseline serum biochemical parameters sclerostin and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b were noninvasive independent predictors of bone loss in CKD patients on dialysis.     

Significant improvement of bone mineral density by denosumab without bisphosphonate pre-treatment in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in outcomes of denosumab for a year with or without bisphosphonate (BP) pre-treatment in patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO).

Methods: Forty-eight female patients with GIO and low bone mineral density (BMD) (T score of BMD; less than ?3.0 SD) were, retrospectively, enrolled and classified into the following two groups: (1) GIO with BP pre-treatment (BP pre-treated group; n?=?24) and (2) GIO without BP treatment (BP pre-untreated group; n?=?24). We measured serum bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), N-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen (P1NP), and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP)-5b at baseline, and at 3, 6, and 12 months. We also assessed BMD of the lumbar 1–4 vertebrae BMD (L-BMD) and bilateral hip BMD (H-BMD) at baseline, and at 6 and 12 months.

Results: TRACP-5b was significantly inhibited at 3 months in both groups and at 6 and 12 months in the BP pre-untreated group compared with pre-treatment levels. Both BAP and P1NP were significantly suppressed at 3, 6, and 12 months in both groups compared with baseline values. L-BMD and H-BMD were significantly increased at 6 (4.2% and 3.4%, respectively) and 12 months (4.7% and 4.7%, respectively) in the BP pre-untreated group over pre-treatment levels. There were no significant differences between the groups during the observational period.

Conclusion: Denosumab significantly improved both L-BMD and H-BMD in the BP pre-untreated group, but not in the BP pre-treated group, suggesting it to be a good option for GIO patients without BP pre-treatment.     

Effects of denosumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover in postmenopausal women

CONTEXT: Denosumab is an investigational fully human monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand, a mediator of osteoclastogenesis and osteoclast survival. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the ability of denosumab to increase bone mineral density (BMD) and decrease bone turnover markers (BTMs) in early and later postmenopausal women with low BMD. DESIGN AND SETTING: This 2-yr randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in North America. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects included 332 postmenopausal women with lumbar spine BMD T-scores between -1.0 and -2.5. Interventions: SUBJECTS were randomly assigned to receive denosumab sc, 60 mg every 6 months, or placebo. Randomization was stratified by time since onset of menopause (< or =5 yr or > 5 yr). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the percent change in lumbar spine BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at 24 months. Additional end points were percent change in volumetric BMD of the distal radius by quantitative computed tomography; percent change in BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for the total hip, one-third radius, and total body; hip structural analysis; percent change in BTMs; and safety. RESULTS: Denosumab significantly increased lumbar spine BMD, compared with placebo at 24 months (6.5 vs. -0.6%; P<0.0001) with similar results for both strata. Denosumab also produced significant increases in BMD at the total hip, one-third radius, and total body (P < 0.0001 vs. placebo); increased distal radius volumetric BMD (P < 0.01); improved hip structural analysis parameters; and significantly suppressed serum C-telopeptide, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b, and intact N-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar between both study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Twice-yearly denosumab increased BMD and decreased BTMs in early and later postmenopausal women.     

Comparison of the efficacy of denosumab and bisphosphonates for treating secondary osteoporosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of denosumab (compared with that of bisphosphonates) for preventing secondary osteoporosis and inflammation caused by excessive bone resorption in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients never previously treated for osteoporosis.

Methods: Ninety-eight patients with coexisting RA and osteoporosis were enrolled. The patients were subdivided by whether they were treated with denosumab (n?=?49) or traditional bisphosphonates (n?=?49). RA disease activity, bone turnover markers, and bone mineral density (BMD) were compared between the two groups before treatment, and after 6 and 12 months of treatment.

Results: There was no significant difference between the groups in any of the disease activity indices and BMD at any of the measured time points. With regard to bone metabolism, denosumab significantly reduced bone-specific alkaline phosphatase at 6 and 12 months compared with pretreatment, but had no effect on tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b levels, suggesting an effect on the bone formation rate, but not on the bone resorption rate.

Conclusions: Neither denosumab nor bisphosphonates could suppress inflammation or RA disease activity, but denosumab significantly suppressed a marker of bone metabolism in Japanese RA patients never previously treated for osteoporosis.     

狄诺塞麦:治疗绝经期女性骨质疏松的新希望

狄诺塞麦是目前用于治疗绝经期骨质疏松的第一种单克隆抗体药物.它能与细胞核因子-κB受体活化因子配体(RANKL)结合,通过抑制破骨细胞的产生、功能和存活,减少骨吸收达到治疗作用.临床试验显示,在绝经后骨质疏松妇女中,狄诺塞麦增加骨密度(BMD)和降低骨折风险的作用优于安慰剂和阿仑膦酸,不良反应与安慰剂和阿仑膦酸相当.药...     

Comparison of the effects of denosumab with either active vitamin D or native vitamin D on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a worldwide health concern. Although treatment with denosumab plus the active vitamin D alfacalcidol has been found to improve femoral neck (FN) and distal forearm bone mineral density (BMD), there have been no reports on the efficacy or adverse effects of denosumab plus eldecalcitol (ELD) in primary osteoporosis patients. Fifty-six treatment-naïve post-menopausal women with primary osteoporosis were recruited and divided into denosumab plus native vitamin D or denosumab plus ELD. Ultimately, 26 subjects in the native vitamin D group and 24 in the ELD group were analyzed. Lumbar and total hip BMD significantly increased in both groups. However, there was no significant difference in the percent increase of lumbar and total hip BMD between two groups. FN-BMD was significantly increased from 6 to 12 months in the ELD group compared with baseline. This study revealed that combination therapy with denosumab and ELD could improve FN-BMD more effectively than denosumab plus native vitamin D. Thus, the addition of ELD may enhance the effects of denosumab treatment for primary osteoporosis.     

Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: A Meta-Analysis

The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to examine the efficacy and safety of denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.Medline, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched until October 30, 2014 using combinations of the following search terms: osteoporosis, postmenopause, postmenopausal, women, denosumab. The primary outcome was bone mineral density (BMD) change, and secondary outcomes were change in the bone turnover markers β-isomerized carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) and serum procollagen type I amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP), and adverse events.Patients treated with denosumab had significantly increased BMD of the lumbar spine (7.58%), total hip (4.86%), and distal third of the radius (2.92%) than those treated with placebo (all, P < 0.001). Patients treated with denosumab had a significant decrease of CTX (−66.16%) and P1NP (−64.65%) as compared with those treated with placebo (both, P < 0.001). Adverse events were similar between the 2 groups (pooled odds ratio = 1.04, P = 0.625).Denosumab increases BMD and decreases markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, and is not associated with significant side-effects.     

Denosumab‐mediated increase in hand bone mineral density associated with decreased progression of bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Objective

Periarticular osteoporosis is one of the earliest radiographic signs of bone damage in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Denosumab, an investigational fully human monoclonal antibody that binds to RANKL, inhibits bone erosion and systemic bone loss in clinical studies of patients with RA. In this hand bone mineral density (BMD) substudy, we investigated the effects of denosumab on hand BMD and its correlation with hand erosion scores.

Methods

Patients receiving methotrexate for erosive RA were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous placebo, denosumab 60 mg, or denosumab 180 mg at 0 and 6 months. Measurements included BMD (by dual x‐ray absorptiometry [DXA]) of both hands (0, 1, 6, and 12 months), magnetic resonance images of the hands/wrists (0 and 6 months), and radiographs of the hands/wrists and feet (0, 6, and 12 months).

Results

There were 56 patients (13 placebo, 21 denosumab 60 mg, and 22 denosumab 180 mg). Mean changes in hand BMD at 6 and 12 months were: +0.8% and +1.0%, respectively, for denosumab 60 mg; +2.0% and +2.5%, respectively, for denosumab 180 mg; and ?1.2% and ?2.0%, respectively, for placebo. Erosion scores remained near baseline in the denosumab groups and increased from baseline in the placebo group. A negative correlation was observed between hand BMD and erosion scores.

Conclusion

In patients with RA, denosumab provided protection against erosion, and not only prevented bone loss but increased hand BMD as measured by DXA.

     

Denosumab for the treatment of osteoporosis: A systematic literature review

PurposeTo determine the efficacy and safety of denosumab in osteoporosis.MethodsA systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1950 to July 2010), meeting abstracts (2009–2010), trial registries, and reference lists. The selection criteria were as follows: (population) osteoporosis patients of any age; (intervention) treatment with denosumab; (outcome) efficacy and safety; (study design) randomized clinical trials (RCTs); no language restrictions. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and subsequently extracted data from the selected studies including quality items, and on outcomes of interest. A meta-analysis was performed for safety issues.ResultsA total of 25 studies were included. Denosumab reduces the risk of new radiographic vertebral fracture in a 68% compared with placebo (p < 0.001) and increases bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine, total hip, and one-third radius more than alendronate and placebo. A single subcutaneous dose of denosumab resulted in a dose-dependent, rapid, profound, and sustained decrease bone turnover markers (BTMs). Denosumab was in general well tolerated. A meta-analysis has shown an increase in the incidence of urinary infections (p = 0.012) and eczema (p < 0.001) in the patients treated with denosumab. Meta-analysis of efficacy was complicated due to the study features.ConclusionsDenosumab given subcutaneously twice yearly is associated with a reduction in the risk of vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fractures in women with osteoporosis. Denosumab is associated with greater and sustained increases in BMD and reductions in BTMs compared with placebo and/or alendronate and with a risk of urinary infections and eczema.     

Effects of alendronate and hormone replacement therapy, alone and in combination, on bone mass and markers of bone turnover in elderly women with osteoporosis

The aim of the study was to compare alendronate, hormone replacement therapy (HRT), and their combination in treatment of osteoporosis in elderly postmenopausal women. Ninety patients, aged 65-80 yr (mean 71), with a T-score of bone mineral density (BMD) of 2.5 or less at either the lumbar spine or the femoral neck were randomized to receive daily 10 mg alendronate (n = 30), 2 mg estradiol plus 1 mg norethisterone acetate (n = 30) (HRT), or their combination (n = 30) for 2 yr. BMD of the lumbar spine and the upper femur was measured at baseline and after 1 and 2 yr of treatment. Urinary excretion of type I collagen aminoterminal telopeptide as related to creatinine and serum type I procollagen aminoterminal propeptide was assayed at baseline and at 6-month intervals thereafter. Increases of 9.1-11.2% in lumbar spine BMD at 2 yr were similar in the study groups. Only HRT increased femoral neck BMD statistically significantly (P < 0.0001 for a change from baseline) at both 1 (+4.9%; P =NS vs. the other groups) and 2 yr (+5.8%; P < 0.05 vs. the other groups). Total hip BMD increased similarly in all study groups. Percentage reductions in urinary type I collagen aminoterminal telopeptide in the HRT group (60.2-62.7%) were significantly smaller than those in the combination group (78.1-80.4%) (P < 0.0001-0.0069) and the alendronate-only group (72.4-76.1%) (P = 0.047 at 24 months). Serum type I procollagen aminoterminal propeptide decreased less in the HRT group (53.6-59.8%) than in the other groups [73.0-75.0% in the alendronate group (P < 0.001 at 12 months); 67.0-71.5% in the combination group (P < 0.0001 at 12 months, P = 0.013 at 24 months)]. We conclude that in elderly postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, the combination of HRT and alendronate did not offer an extra gain of bone mass over either treatment alone. In terms of BMD changes, the single treatments were equally effective, but the reductions in bone markers were less with HRT than with alendronate.     

Efficacy of 4-year denosumab treatment alone or in combination with teriparatide in Japanese postmenopausal osteoporotic women

Abstract

Purpose: This extended randomized prospective study aimed to compare the 4-year clinical outcomes of denosumab treatment alone or in combination with teriparatide in treatment-naïve postmenopausal Japanese patients with osteoporosis.

Methods: Between July 2013 and December 2016, 30 eligible women from our previous study were enrolled. After newly adding 17 randomly assigned patients, 47 patients were classified into the denosumab alone group (denosumab group, n?=?22) or denosumab plus teriparatide group (combination group, n?=?25). Serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP)-5b, urinary cross-linked N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX), and bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar 1–4 vertebrae (L-BMD) and bilateral total hips (H-BMD) were determined at the first visit and at regular time points up to 48 months of treatment to determine percentage changes.

Results: BAP was significantly decreased from baseline in both groups from 24 to 48 months, with significant differences at all time points between the groups. TRACP-5b and urinary NTX were comparably decreased at every time point in both groups versus pretreatment levels. L-BMD was significantly more increased by combination therapy over denosumab alone at 24 and 30 months (21.1% increase vs. 14.2% increase at 48 months). There were no significant differences in H-BMD between the groups, although levels tended to be higher in the combination group throughout the study period (9.7% increase vs. 6.8% increase at 48 months).

Conclusion: Long-term denosumab and teriparatide combination therapy represents an effective treatment option for primary osteoporosis patients with low L-BMD.     

血清骨特异性酸性磷酸酶的临床意义

血清抗酒石酸酸性磷酸酶 5b(TRAP 5b)是反映骨吸收的一种标志物。本研究结果显示正常绝经后妇女血清TRAP 5b水平高于正常绝经前妇女 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,绝经后骨质疏松的妇女高于正常绝经后妇女 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,骨折、糖尿病、肾病等患者高于相应的对照者 (P <0 .0 5或P <0 .0 1)。     

Improved real-life adherence of 6-monthly denosumab injections due to positive feedback based on rapid 6-month BMD increase and good safety profile

Almost 50 % of osteoporosis (OP) patients discontinue bisphosphonate (BP) therapy within 1–2 years after the start of their treatment. Denosumab’s longer dosing interval with its administration every 6 months (Q6M) as a subcutaneous (sc) injection might result in a better real-life treatment adherence and persistence than weekly or monthly oral BP treatment regimen. The objectives of this open, investigator-initiated, prospective, observational, single-center study were to evaluate adherence with denosumab 60 mg sc every 6 months (Q6M) (Prolia^®) injections in osteoporotic patients in a routine clinical care setting and to describe whether positive feedback to OP patients based on measured bone mineral density (BMD) increases and good safety profile have an impact on patients’ real-life adherence. Results indicate that the rarity of adverse events and reduced dosage frequency together with the consistency of rapid and highly significant increases in BMD already after 6 months of denosumab therapy used as a positive reinforcement during doctor–patient interactions had a significant, positive impact on osteoporotic patient’s adherence to continue with the 6-monthly sc denosumab injections.     

The effect of raloxifene after discontinuation of long-term alendronate treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers of bone turnover in patients receiving long-term alendronate therapy who continued alendronate, were switched to raloxifene, or discontinued antiresorptive therapy. DESIGN, PATIENTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: Ninety-nine ambulatory women who were diagnosed with postmenopausal osteoporosis and treated with alendronate (10 mg/d) for a mean period of 43 months were randomized to double-blind raloxifene (60 mg/d; n = 33), placebo (n = 33), or continuation of open-label alendronate (n = 33) for 12 months. Patients continued their assigned treatment in a subsequent 12-month, open-label extension phase. All patients received supplemental calcium (500 mg/d) and vitamin D (800 IU/d). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: BMD (lumbar spine, total femur, femoral neck, distal forearm, and total body) and biochemical markers (serum intact amino-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen, type 1 collagen cross-linked C-telopeptide, and osteocalcin) were measured at baseline and follow-up visits. RESULTS: Discontinuation of alendronate therapy resulted in a decrease in lumbar spine BMD at 12 months (-2.66%; P < 0.05), but did not change total femur BMD (+0.35%; nonsignificant). Raloxifene and alendronate, compared with discontinuation, prevented lumbar spine BMD loss (-0.75% and -0.54% at 12 months, respectively; P < 0.05). Raloxifene and alendronate caused a similar increase in total femur BMD at 12 months (1.45% and 1.56%; both P < 0.05 vs. baseline; nonsignificant vs. discontinuation). Patients, who discontinued alendronate therapy experienced an increase in bone turnover. Bone turnover increases were less pronounced in patients taking raloxifene and were absent in those who continued alendronate. Of the three groups, mean bone turnover in raloxifene patients was the closest to premenopausal mean values. CONCLUSIONS: BMD preservation and increase were most pronounced in patients continuing alendronate. Raloxifene treatment, compared with placebo, demonstrated beneficial effects on BMD and bone turnover after discontinuation of long-term alendronate therapy.     

Biochemical markers of bone turnover as predictors of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures in men and women: 10-year follow-up of the Taiji cohort

Abstract

We aimed to assess the capacity of biochemical markers of bone turnover (BTMs) to predict bone loss, osteoporosis (OP), and osteoporotic fractures. We randomly selected 400 individuals (age 40–79 years in 1993; 50 of each gender and age stratum) from a list of registered residents. In the years 1993, 1996, 2000, and 2003, bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and hip were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The BTMs assessed at baseline were serum intact osteocalcin (OC), total OC, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, C-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen, N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP), C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen generated by matrix metalloproteinase, C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (beta-CTX), N-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX), urinary pyridinoline, and deoxypyridinoline (DPD). For 307 completers, multivariate analysis after adjusting for confounders revealed that serum PINP levels in men [hazard ratio (HR) 2.80, P < 0.05] and serum PINP (HR 1.65, P < 0.05), beta-CTX (HR 1.80, P < 0.001), NTX (HR 1.96, P < 0.01), and urinary DPD levels (HR 1.40, P < 0.05) in women were significantly related to the occurrence of spinal OP. In addition to adjustment for the baseline status of BMD, i.e., osteopenia or normal range, PINP, beta-CTX, and NTX in women could significantly predict the future occurrence of spinal OP. BTMs were not significant predictors of bone loss, femoral OP, or osteoporotic fractures. In conclusion, various BTMs in women can predict the occurrence of spinal OP.     

Bone status in adults with early-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis following 1-year anti-TNFα therapy and discontinuation of glucocorticoids

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is an inflammatory disease associated with bone loss and low bone mineral density (BMD). The treatment involves disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, glucocorticoids (GCs) and biological agents. The aim of this study was to evaluate effects of 12-month therapy with the anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) preparations on bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical turnover markers (BTM) in adult patients with JIA who were previously either treated or not treated with glucocorticoids (GC) and to assess effects of the discontinuation of GCs on their bone status. Nineteen adult patients (12 women, 7 men) aged 18–33 years with active JIA were prospectively enrolled to receive the anti-TNFα therapy (infliximab, etanercept or adalimumab). BMD and BTMs were determined at baseline and 1-year follow-up. The anti-TNFα therapy resulted in a significant reduction in disease activity score 28 (DAS28) and C-reactive protein (CRP) and a significant increase in BMD at the lumbar spine and total body and in serum N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP, marker of bone formation). No significant changes in serum beta C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (βCTX, marker of osteoclastic bone resorption) and osteocalcin (marker of bone remodeling) were found. A significant negative correlation was observed between the change in the DAS28, CRP and serum PINP. The change in serum PINP concentrations positively correlated with the change in lumbar spine BMD. A significant increase in serum PINP was observed only in patients discontinuing GCs during the anti-TNFα treatment. After the initiation of the anti-TNFα therapy in young adults with JIA, the increase in new bone formation can be explained by discontinuation of GCs administration as the patients with the largest reduction in DAS28 and CRP probably are the ones most likely to stop GC.     

The RANKL/OPG system and bone mineral density in patients with chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Osteopenia and osteoporosis are common complications of chronic liver disease (CLD). Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) regulate osteoclastogenesis and bone remodelling, and are involved in several inflammatory diseases. This study investigated the activation state of the RANKL/OPG system and its association with bone loss in CLD. METHODS: Serum levels of OPG and sRANKL were determined in 193 patients with CLD and 56 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Cellular sources of OPG and RANKL were determined immunohistochemically. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry was performed to determine bone mineral density (BMD) of lumbar spine and femoral neck. RESULTS: sRANKL serum levels were significantly elevated in non-cirrhotic, but not cirrhotic patients compared to healthy controls. OPG serum levels were elevated 1.6-fold in non-cirrhotic and 2.8-fold in cirrhotic CLD patients. RANKL+ cells were mainly confined to portal fields, while OPG was broadly expressed. In the cirrhotic subgroup (87 patients) we observed a significantly higher OPG/sRANKL ratio in patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis of the lumbar spine and femoral neck region (T-score < -1) compared to those with normal BMD (T-score > or = -1). CONCLUSIONS: CLD is associated with alterations in RANKL/OPG serum levels, which could modulate bone loss in CLD.     

Denosumab treatment effects on structural damage, bone mineral density, and bone turnover in rheumatoid arthritis: a twelve-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: RANKL is essential for osteoclast development, activation, and survival. Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal IgG2 antibody that binds RANKL, inhibiting its activity. The aim of this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study was to evaluate the effects of denosumab on structural damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving methotrexate treatment. METHODS: RA patients received subcutaneous placebo (n = 75), denosumab 60 mg (n = 71), or denosumab 180 mg (n = 72) injections every 6 months for 12 months. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) erosion score at 6 months. RESULTS: At 6 months, the increase in the MRI erosion score from baseline was lower in the 60-mg denosumab group (mean change 0.13; P = 0.118) and significantly lower in the 180-mg denosumab group (mean change 0.06; P = 0.007) than in the placebo group (mean change 1.75). A significant difference in the modified Sharp erosion score was observed as early as 6 months in the 180-mg denosumab group (P = 0.019) as compared with placebo, and at 12 months, both the 60-mg (P = 0.012) and the 180-mg (P = 0.007) denosumab groups were significantly different from the placebo group. Denosumab caused sustained suppression of markers of bone turnover. There was no evidence of an effect of denosumab on joint space narrowing or on measures of RA disease activity. Rates of adverse events were comparable between the denosumab and placebo groups. CONCLUSION: Addition of twice-yearly injections of denosumab to ongoing methotrexate treatment inhibited structural damage in patients with RA for up to 12 months, with no increase in the rates of adverse events as compared with placebo.     

A randomized, placebo-controlled study of the effects of denosumab for the treatment of men with low bone mineral density

Context: Men with low bone mineral density (BMD) were treated with denosumab. Objective: Our objective was to investigate the effects of denosumab compared with placebo in men with low BMD after 1 yr of treatment. Design, Subjects, and Intervention: This was a placebo-controlled, phase 3 study to investigate the efficacy and safety of denosumab 60 mg every 6 months vs. placebo in men with low BMD. Main Outcome Measure: The primary endpoint was the percent change from baseline in lumbar spine (LS) BMD at month 12. Results: Of the 242 randomized subjects (mean age 65 yr), 228 (94.2%) completed 1 yr of denosumab therapy. After 12 months, denosumab resulted in BMD increases of 5.7% at the LS, 2.4% at the total hip, 2.1% at the femoral neck, 3.1% at the trochanter, and 0.6% at the one third radius (adjusted P ≤ 0.0144 for BMD percent differences at all sites compared with placebo). Sensitivity analyses done by controlling for baseline covariates (such as baseline testosterone levels, BMD T-scores, and 10-yr osteoporotic fracture risk) demonstrated that the results of the primary endpoint were robust. Subgroup analyses indicate that treatment with denosumab was effective across a spectrum of clinical situations. Treatment with denosumab significantly reduced serum CTX levels at d 15 (adjusted P < 0.0001). The incidence of adverse events was similar between groups. Conclusions: One year of denosumab therapy in men with low BMD was well tolerated and resulted in a reduction in bone resorption and significant increases in BMD at all skeletal sites assessed.     

Denosumab for joints and bones

Denosumab is an investigational, fully human monoclonal antibody with a high affinity and specificity for receptor activator of nuclear factor κ B ligand (RANKL), a cytokine member of the tumor necrosis factor family. RANKL, an essential mediator of osteoclast formation, function, and survival, plays a major role in the pathogenesis of postmenopausal osteoporosis, structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis, and bone loss associated with other skeletal disorders. Denosumab suppresses bone turnover by inhibiting the action of RANKL on osteoclasts. Denosumab reduces bone turnover and increases bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density, reduces fracture risk in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, and inhibits structural damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis when added to ongoing methotrexate treatment. It is generally well tolerated, with a good safety profile. Adverse and serious adverse events, including infections and malignancy, are similar in patients treated with denosumab or placebo.