Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors

PURPOSE: Partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors represents a technical challenge not only for laparoscopic, but also for open surgeons. We report the technical feasibility and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for hilar tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2001 and September 2004, 25 of 362 patients (6.9%) undergoing LPN for tumor, as performed by a single surgeon, had a hilar tumor. We defined hilar tumor as a tumor located in the renal hilum that was demonstrated to be in actual physical contact with the renal artery and/or renal vein on preoperative 3-dimensional computerized tomography. En bloc hilar clamping with cold excision of the tumor, including its delicate mobilization from the renal vessels, followed by sutured renal reconstruction was performed routinely. RESULTS: Laparoscopic surgery was successful in all cases without any open conversions or operative re-interventions. Mean tumor size was 3.7 cm (range 1 to 10.3), 4 patients (16%) had a solitary kidney and the indication for LPN was imperative in 10 patients (40%). Pelvicaliceal repair was performed in 22 patients (88%), mean warm ischemia time was 36.4 minutes (range 27 to 48), mean blood loss was 231 cc (range 50 to 900), mean total operative time was 3.6 hours (range 2 to 5) and mean hospital stay was 3.5 days (range 1.5 to 6.7). Histopathology confirmed renal cell carcinoma in 17 patients (68%), of whom all had negative margins. In 2002 or earlier hemorrhagic complications occurred in 3 patients (12%). No kidney was lost for technical reasons. CONCLUSIONS: LPN can be performed in select patients with a hilar tumor. The technical feasibility reported further extends the scope of LPN. To our knowledge the initial experience in the literature is reported.     

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: 3-year followup

PURPOSE: LPN is a viable alternative to open partial nephrectomy for select small renal tumors. However, published intermediate term oncological data are sparse. We present our experience with LPN for tumor in 100 patients with a minimum followup of 3 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of the 480 LPNs performed at our institution a minimum followup of 3 years is available in 100 patients since 1999. Overall and cancer specific survival data were obtained from patient charts, radiographic reports and direct telephone calls to patient families. RESULTS: All 100 cases were completed laparoscopically without open conversion. Mean tumor size was 3.1 cm and mean warm ischemia was 27 minutes. Final histopathology revealed renal cell carcinoma in 68 patients, including 1 with positive surgical margins. A second patient with oncocytoma had a positive surgical margin. At a median followup of 42 months (mean 42.6, range 24.3 to 62.5) no patient had evidence of local or port site recurrence. Two patients with renal cell carcinoma had a contralateral renal mass. Overall survival was 86% and cancer specific survival was 100%. Mean preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine was 1.1 and 1.3 mg/dl, respectively. Two patients with preoperative chronic renal insufficiency were undergoing hemodialysis. CONCLUSIONS: At 3-year followup LPN provides oncological outcomes comparable to those in contemporary open partial nephrectomy series.     

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in cold ischemia: renal artery perfusion

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy represents a feasible option for patients with small renal masses. We describe our initial experience with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in cold ischemia achieved by renal artery perfusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From November 2001 to March 2003 laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in cold ischemia was performed in 15 patients with renal cell carcinoma. Cold ischemia was achieved by continuous perfusion of Ringers lactate at 4C through the renal artery, which was clamped. Tumor excision was performed in a bloodless field with biopsy taken from the tumor bed. The collecting system was repaired if needed. Renal reconstruction was performed by suturing over hemostatic bolsters. RESULTS: All procedures were successfully completed laparoscopically by our new technique. Mean operative time was 185 minutes (range 135 to 220). Mean ischemia time was 40 minutes (range 27 to 101). Estimated mean intraoperative blood loss was 160 ml (range 30 to 650). Entry to the collecting system in 6 patients was repaired intraoperatively. Additional vascular repair was done in 2 patients. There were no significant postoperative complications. Postoperative followup in 8 patients showed that the renal parenchyma was not damaged by the ischemic period. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial experience of incorporating cold ischemia via arterial perfusion into laparoscopic partial nephrectomy shows the feasibility and safety of the technique. We believe that this approach has the potential to make laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma safe and reliable.     

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: evaluation of long-term oncological outcome

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) has emerged as a viable alternative to open surgery for renal tumors less than 4 cm. We present oncological followup of patients treated with laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between September 1996 and December 2001, 48 patients who underwent LPN for clinically localized tumors were found to have pathologically proven renal cell carcinoma. Medical and operative records were reviewed for clinical characteristics, pathological findings and followup information. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 59.7 years (range 32 to 81) and mean followup was 37.7 months (range 22 to 84). Mean tumor size was 2.4 cm (range 1.0 to 4.0). Final pathological stage was pT1 in 42 patients (87.5%) and pT3a in 6 (12.5%). Histology revealed clear cell in 32 patients (66.7%), papillary in 10 (20.8%), chromophobe in 3 (6.3%), collecting duct in 1 (2.1%) and unclassified in 2 (4.2%). Intraoperative frozen section biopsies revealed negative margins in all cases. Final surgical margins were positive in 1 patient (2.1%). Followup evaluation consisting of physical examination and yearly cross-sectional imaging, which revealed no recurrences in 46 of 48 patients (95.8%). One patient with von Hippel-Lindau disease was found to have local recurrence 18 months after LPN and observation was elected. The second patient had recurrence in the same kidney away from the original tumor site approximately 4 years later. CONCLUSIONS: LPN is an effective treatment modality for clinically localized renal cell carcinoma. Oncological outcomes at a mean followup of 3 years are promising, although the durability of oncological outcomes must be determined.     

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for multiple tumours: feasibility and analysis of peri-operative outcomes

Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Laparoscopic nephron‐sparing procedures have been increasingly utilized. However, in the presence of multiple tumours the procedure choice is usually shifted to radical nephrectomy. In view of favourable perioperative outcomes, the benefits of minimally‐invasive, nephron‐sparing surgery in experienced hands could be safely extended to patients presenting with multiple ipsilateral renal masses.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To describe our experience with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for multiple kidney tumours and compare the outcomes with LPN performed for single masses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? Retrospective analysis of medical records of patients undergoing LPN at our institution between 2005 and 2009 was performed.
• ? The cohort was divided in two groups based on tumour focality: group 1, LPN for a single tumour (n= 99) and group 2, LPN for multiple ipsilateral tumours (n= 12).
• ? The groups were compared with regards to demographic and peri‐operative variables.

RESULTS

• ? Demographic variables were not different between the groups. Median dominant tumour size was 3.1 cm (interquartile range [IQR] 2.4–4.0) and 4.0 cm (2.3–5.9) in groups 1 and 2, respectively.
• ? Median secondary tumour size in group 2 was 1.0 cm (1.0–1.8).
• ? Operative times were longer in group 2 compared with group 1 (220 vs 160 min, P= 0.009).
• ? Warm ischaemia times (WIT) (23 vs 22 min) and estimated blood loss (EBL) (100 vs 85 mL) were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

• ? LPN is a viable option for the treatment of multiple ipsilateral renal tumours.
• ? Peri‐operative outcomes are similar to standard LPN with the exception of longer operative time.
• ? In experienced hands, the advantages of minimally invasive surgery may be extended to select patients with ipsilateral multifocal renal tumours.

     

Laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy in consecutive patients: the Cornell experience

OBJECTIVE: To compare a contemporary series of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) at one institution, to evaluate the size and types of tumour in each group and the early outcome after each procedure, as LPN is replacing open radical nephrectomy as the standard of care for uncomplicated renal tumours but partial nephrectomy remains significantly more difficult laparoscopically, especially if the goal is to duplicate the open surgical technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the records of all patients who underwent partial nephrectomy at our institution from January 2000 to April 2004, identifying 66 who had LPN and compared them with 59 who had OPN (mean age at LPN and OPN, 62.1 and 64.2 years, respectively; 70% men in each group). Variables analysed included operative time, blood loss, creatinine levels before and after partial nephrectomy, time to resuming clear liquids and regular diet, length of stay, tumour size, tumour pathological type and complications. Groups were compared using Student's t-test, with P < 0.05 taken to indicate significance. RESULTS: Of those having LPN, 59% had right-sided tumours, vs 53% in the OPN group; the respective mean tumour size was 2.2 and 3.4 cm, the mean operative duration 144 and 239 min (both P < 0.001), and the mean estimated blood loss 236 and 363 mL (P = 0.09). Seven patients in the OPN group had obligatory partial nephrectomy for either a solitary kidney (two) or azotaemia (five). No patient in the LPN group required an obligatory partial nephrectomy. Serum creatinine levels were measured before and 1 and 2 days after surgery, and were 88, 88 and 97 micromol/L for the LPN group, and 97, 106 and 106 micromol/L for the OPN group. Clear fluids were started a mean of 41 h after surgery, a regular diet resumed 76 h after and discharge was 129 h after surgery in the OPN group; the respective values for the LPN group were 24 h (P = 0.01), 49 h (P = 0.2) and 82 h (P < 0.001). Complications were similar in both groups but the pathological subtypes differed. CONCLUSIONS: LPN offers early functional advantages over OPN in terms of earlier resumption of diet and slightly earlier discharge. However, the two groups of patients were clearly not evenly matched for size nor pathological subtypes, with larger, malignant subtypes more predominant in the OPN group. These results suggest that while LPN is a safe, effective treatment for small renal tumours, obligatory partial nephrectomy or large tumours continue to be performed using open techniques with good results.     

Hand assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for peripheral and central lesions: a review of 30 consecutive cases

PURPOSE: We reviewed our first 30 hand assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomies and compared the results of 8 centrally located vs 22 peripherally located tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tumors were classified by computerized tomography as central (less than 5 mm from the pelvicaliceal system or hilar vessels) or peripheral. The hand assisted technique consisted of mobilization and manual parenchymal compression without vascular occlusion or ureteral stent placement. Argon beam coagulation and a fibrin glue bandage were used for hemostasis. RESULTS: Mean tumor size was 2.6 cm (range 1.0 to 4.7). Mean operative time was 199 and 271 minutes, and estimated blood loss was 240 and 894 ml for peripheral and central lesions, respectively. No case required open conversion. The final diagnoses were renal cell carcinoma in 21 patients, angiomyolipoma in 4, benign or hemorrhagic cyst in 3 and oncocytoma in 2. Initial positive margins were found in 5 of 30 specimens (16.7%) (1 central and 4 peripheral) and all final resection margins were negative. Four central (50%) and 2 peripheral (9.1%) tumor cases required transfusion. Drain creatinine was elevated in 6 patients (20%) postoperatively, of whom 3 had a central and 3 had a peripheral lesion. All responded to conservative management except 1 patient (3.3%) who required stent placement. Postoperative bleeding in a central tumor case required transfusion of 4 units. There were no short-term local recurrences and 1 patient had an asynchronous tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Hand assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is safe with excellent immediate cancer control. Careful dissection and frozen section analysis are mandatory to ensure a negative tumor margin. Blood loss and transfusion rates were higher in patients with centrally located tumors and renal hilar vascular control should be considered for central lesions.     

Fibrin glue-oxidized cellulose sandwich for laparoscopic wedge resection of small renal lesions

Purpose:We present our experience with standard laparoscopic wedge resection of small renal tumors using a fibrin glue-oxidized cellulose sandwich for hemostasis.Materials and Methods:From May 2002 to December 2003, 15 patients underwent laparoscopic wedge resection for a total of 15 nonhilar renal masses. Renal hilar clamping was performed in 1 patient and no sutures were placed. We used ultrasonic shears and an argon beam coagulator to resect and then coagulate the tumor bed. Tisseel (Baxter Corp., Deerfield, Illinois) was applied to the resection bed, followed by a layer of oxidized, regenerated cellulose (Surgicel, Ethicon, Somerville, New Jersey) and a final layer of Tisseel.Results:Mean preoperative tumor size was 2.2 × 2.2 × 2.1 cm. Lesions were subdivided based on the percent of the lesion that extended beyond the renal parenchymal border on computerized tomography as exophytic—greater than 60% in 6 cases, endophytic—less than 40% in 4 and mesophytic—40% to 60% in 5. Mean operative time was 3.8 hours (range 3 to 5). Mean blood loss was 108 ml (range 20 to 300). No patient required blood transfusion. There was no significant difference in blood loss or change in creatinine among the endophytic, exophytic and mesophytic groups (150, 121 and 93 ml, and 0.03, 0.07 and 0.04 mg/dl, respectively). Margin status was negative in all cases (mean thickness 3.2 mm). Average hospital stay and time to the resumption of oral intake were 2.7 and 1.4 days, respectively.Conclusions:Small exophytic or mesophytic renal lesions can be safely excised laparoscopically without vessel clamping. Excellent hemostasis was achieved in each case with the newer hemostatic agents.     

Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for the treatment of pathological T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma: a 5-year survival rate

PURPOSE: We retrospectively compared the oncological adequacy of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy to that of open partial nephrectomy in the treatment of patients with pathological stage T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 143 patients with stage T1N0M0 renal tumors confirmed by pathological examination of the surgical specimen underwent partial nephrectomy between January 1996 and June 2004 with a followup of at least 1.5 years. Of these patients 85 were treated laparoscopically and the remaining 58 underwent open surgery. Medical and operative records were retrospectively reviewed with emphasis on tumor recurrence and survival. Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The mean followup for the laparoscopy group was 40.4 +/- 18.0 months. A total of 83 patients survived. Of these patients 2 patients experienced disease recurrence within 18 to 46.2 months, 1 patient died of cancer metastasis to brain within 29.7 months and 1 died of an unrelated cause. Seeding of the port sites did not develop in any of the patients. The 5-year disease-free and actuarial survival rates for this group were 91.4%, and 93.8%, respectively. The 58 patients who underwent open surgery had a mean followup of 49.68 +/- 28.84 months. A total of 53 patients survived without any disease recurrence, 1 survived with recurrence within 8 months, 1 survived with metastasis within 49 months and 3 died of unrelated causes. The 5-year disease-free and patient survival rates for this group were 97.6% and 95.8%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier disease-free survival and patient survival analysis revealed no significant differences between the laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is an alternative technique with mid-range oncological results comparable to open partial nephrectomy in patients with localized pathological stage T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma.     

Complications of radical and partial nephrectomy in a large contemporary cohort

PURPOSE: Standardized criteria for reporting the early complications of urological procedures are lacking. We reviewed the early complications of radical nephrectomy (RN) and partial nephrectomy (PN) in a large contemporary cohort using a standardized complication grading scale. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1995 and 2002, 1,049 patients underwent RN (66%) or PN (34%) for renal cortical neoplasm. Records were reviewed for perioperative complications. Complications were graded using a 5-tiered scale based on the severity of impact or intensity of therapy required. RESULTS: A total of 235 complications occurred in 180 patients (17%). Overall 55% and 31% of complications were grade I and grade II, respectively. There were 3 perioperative deaths (0.2%). PN was not associated with more complications compared to RN when accounting for other variables. PN cases had more procedure related complications compared to RN (9% versus 3%, respectively, p = 0.0001) due to complications of urinary leak and the reintervention rate was subsequently higher (2.5% versus 0.6%, p = 0.02). All but 1 of the reinterventions for PN involved either endoscopy or radiology. By multivariate analysis operative time (p <0.0001) and solitary kidney (p = 0.06) were associated with procedure related complications of PN. CONCLUSIONS: RN and PN are associated with low rates of serious morbidity and mortality. Compared to RN, PN is associated with higher rates of procedure related complications, the majority of which are minor. Overall, however, PN is not associated with more complications than RN.     

Laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To critically analyse the results of laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as phase III evidence supports cytoreductive nephrectomy before immunotherapy, and there is an overall shift towards minimally invasive renal surgery for this disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since October 2000, 22 patients were treated by laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic RCC (group 1). All patients had radiological evidence of metastatic disease, with biopsy confirmation in 10. To put the results into perspective, 25 consecutive contemporary patients with large organ-confined nonmetastatic RCC (>7 cm, clinical stage T2) undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (group 2) were compared retrospectively. The baseline demographics were comparable between the groups. RESULTS: The mean tumour size was 8 cm in group 1 and 9.6 cm in group 2 (P = 0.07). Variables during and after surgery were comparable between the groups, with a mean operative duration of 3.1 vs 3.2 h (P = 0.82), blood loss of 285 vs 308 mL (P = 0.79), complications in two vs eight (P = 0.08), morphine sulphate equivalent requirements of 51.7 vs 44.1 mg (P = 0.1) and a median length of hospital stay of 1.7 vs 1.6 days (P = 0.68). In group 1 the median (range) time to immunotherapy was 35 (13-136) days. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy is safe and effective in selected patients. Currently the procedure is offered to candidates eligible for immunotherapy and with tumours of < or = 15 cm, and no evidence of adjacent organ invasion or inferior vena caval thrombus. Significant perihilar adenopathy and numerous parasitic vessels can increase the complexity of the surgery. Adequate laparoscopic experience is necessary.     

Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: patient selection and perioperative outcomes

PURPOSE: We compared the results of transperitoneal (T) and retroperitoneal (R) approaches to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) in regard to perioperative outcomes and technical considerations, thereby, identifying patient selection guidelines for each approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The choice of approach was dictated primarily by tumor location, that is TLPN for anterior or lateral lesions and RLPN for posterior or posterolateral lesions. The approaches differed primarily by the hilar control technique. During TLPN en bloc hilar control was achieved with a Satinsky clamp, while during RLPN individual vessel control was obtained with bulldog clamps. RESULTS: In a 3-year period 100 TLPNs and 63 RLPNs were performed for renal tumor. Of posterior tumors 77% were managed by RLPN, whereas 97% of anterior tumors were managed by TLPN. TLPN was associated with significantly larger tumors (3.2 vs 2.5 cm, p <0.001), more caliceal suture repairs (79% vs 57%, p = 0.004), longer ischemia time (31 vs 28 minutes, p = 0.04), longer operative time (3.5 vs 2.9 hours, p <0.001) and longer hospital stay (2.9 vs 2.2 days, p <0.01) than RLPN. Blood loss, perioperative complications, postoperative serum creatinine, analgesic requirements and histological outcomes were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: We perform TLPN for all anterior or lateral tumors as well as for large or deeply infiltrating posterior tumors that require substantive resection (heminephrectomy). The limited retroperitoneal space makes RLPN technically more challenging but provides superior access to posterior and particularly posteromedial lesions. When feasible, we prefer to perform laparoscopic partial nephrectomy by the transperitoneal approach because of its larger working area and superior instrument angles for intracorporeal renal reconstruction.     

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in solitary kidney

PURPOSE: We report our experience with LPN for tumor in a solitary kidney. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 430 patients undergoing LPN since February 1999 at our institution 22 (5%) underwent LPN for tumor in a solitary kidney, as performed by a single surgeon. The laparoscopic technique that we used duplicated open principles, including hilar clamping, cold cut tumor excision and sutured renal reconstruction. RESULTS: Mean tumor size was 3.6 cm (range 1.4 to 8.3, median 3 cm), median blood loss was 200 cc (range 50 to 500), warm ischemia time was 29 minutes (range 14 to 55), total operative time was 3.3 hours (range 2.2 to 4.5) and hospital stay was 2.8 days (range 1.3 to 12). Two cases (9%) were electively converted to open surgery. Pathological findings confirmed renal cell carcinoma in 16 patients (73%) with negative surgical margins in all those with LPN. Major complications occurred in 3 patients (15%) and minor complications developed in 7 (32%). Median preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine (1.2 and 1.5 mg/dl) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (67.5 and 50 ml per minute per 1.73 m2) reflected a change of 33% and 27%, respectively, which appeared proportionate to the median amount of kidney parenchyma excised (23%). One patient (4.5%) required temporary hemodialysis. At a median followup of 2.5 years (range 0.5 to 4.5) cancer specific and overall survival was 100% and 91%, respectively. No patient with LPN had local or port site recurrence, or metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: LPN can be performed efficaciously and safely in select patients with tumor in a solitary kidney. To our knowledge we present the largest series in the literature. Advanced laparoscopic experience and expertise are necessary in this high risk population.     

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy of solid renal masses without hilar clamping using a monopolar radio frequency device

PURPOSE: Partial nephrectomy is currently recommended for most amenable solid renal tumors, especially if they are exophytic and less than 4 cm. We reviewed our initial experience with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for solid renal masses without clamping the renal vasculature using a monopolar device that uses radio frequency energy with low volume saline irrigation for simultaneous blunt dissection, hemostatic sealing and coagulation of the renal parenchyma (TissueLink, TissueLink Medical, Inc., Dover, New Hampshire). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2002 to April 2003, 10 patients underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, including 9 with solid renal masses and 1 with a complex cyst. In all cases the renal hilum was dissected and the renal vessels were isolated but none had renal vascular clamping. The TissueLink DS dissecting sealer or Floating Ball (TissueLink Medical, Inc.) was used to dissect the tumor free bluntly, while simultaneously sealing and coagulating bleeders. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 54.6 years (range 42 to 72). Mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 2.3 (range 2 to 4). Mean tumor size was 3.9 cm (range 2.1 to 8). The mass had a peripheral location in 7 cases and a central location in 3. Mean operative time was 232 minutes (range 144 to 280) and mean blood loss was 352 ml (range 20 to 1000). One patient received blood transfusion and all tumor margins were negative. Mean hospital stay was 1.7 days (range 1 to 5) and pain medication use was minimal. One patient had a brief period of urine leakage from the lower pole calix, which was managed successfully by ureteral stenting and Foley catheter drainage of the bladder. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy can be performed without renal vascular clamping. TissueLink technology allows complete tumor resection and provides adequate parenchymal hemostasis of the tumor bed. Its scant tissue charring production does not interfere with the pathological assessment of the tumor margin status.     

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for technically challenging tumours

Study Type – Therapy (case series)
Level of Evidence 4

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for endophytic tumours and those located near the hilum or the posterior upper‐pole, as these pose a technical challenge.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Technically challenging tumours were defined as endophytic, hilar, or at the posterior upper‐pole (group 1), and were compared to tumours in other locations (group 2). We collected data prospectively for all patients undergoing LPN at our institution, including baseline patient and tumour characteristics, surgical and postoperative outcomes. Two‐sided t‐test or rank‐sum test, and chi‐square or exact tests were used as appropriate for comparison of continuous and categorical variables, respectively, with P < 0.05 considered to indicate statistical significance.

RESULTS

There were 184 patients treated with LPN (42 in group 1 and 142 in group 2) between 2002 and 2008 by one surgeon (A.L.S.). Groups 1 and 2 were similar in terms of baseline variables (age, sex, body mass index, comorbidities, previous surgery, renal function and haematocrit) and in tumour size. LPN for challenging tumours resulted in a higher rate of collecting system repair (78% in group 1, 61% in group 2, P = 0.03). However, operative (surgery time, warm ischaemia time, blood loss, intraoperative complications) and postoperative outcomes (renal function, nadir haematocrit, complication rate, hospital stay and positive margin rate) were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

With developing experience LPN can be safe for technically challenging renal tumours in well selected patients.