ADP receptors: inhibitory strategies for antiplatelet therapy

The interaction of adenosine-5'-diphosphate (ADP) with its platelet receptors (P2Y(1) and P2Y(12)) plays a very important role in thrombogenesis. The thienopyridine ticlopidine was the first specific antagonist of the platelet P2Y(12) ADP receptor to be tested in randomized clinical trials for the prevention of arterial thrombotic events. Although ticlopidine reduces the incidence of vascular events in patients at risk, it also unfortunately has some significant drawbacks: a relatively high incidence of toxic effects, which may be fatal in some cases; delayed onset of action; and a high interindividual variability in response. A second thienopyridine, clopidogrel, has superseded ticlopidine, because it is also an efficacious antithrombotic drug and is less toxic than ticlopidine. However, clopidogrel is not completely free from faults: severe toxic effects, albeit occurring much less frequently than with ticlopidine, may still complicate its administration to patients; the onset of pharmacologic action can be accelerated by the use of large loading doses, but may still not be optimal; the high interpatient variability in response remains an important issue. These concerns justify the continued search for agents that can further improve the clinical outcome of patients with atherosclerosis through greater efficacy and/or safety. A new thienopyridyl compound, prasugrel, which is characterized by higher potency and faster onset of action compared with clopidogrel, is currently under clinical evaluation. Two direct and reversible P2Y(12) antagonists, cangrelor and AZD6140, feature very rapid onset and reversal of platelet inhibition, which make them attractive alternatives to thienopyridines, especially when rapid inhibition of platelet aggregation or its quick reversal are required. Along with new the P2Y(12) antagonists, inhibitors of the other platelet receptor for ADP, the antagonists P2Y(1), are under development and may prove to be effective antithrombotic agents.     

Role of antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular disease II: Ischemic stroke

The etiology of cerebrovascular disease is heterogeneous, with the majority of strokes being of ischemic origin. Transient ischemic attack is now considered to be an important precursor and long-term risk factor for ischemic stroke. Given the lack of acute therapies for ischemic stroke, current treatments focus on secondary prevention through risk-factor management, pharmacotherapy and interventional approaches. As illustrated in this paper, antiplatelet agents (e.g. clopidogrel, aspirin, dipyridamole) are the cornerstone of therapy for prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke.     

Role of antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular disease II: Ischemic stroke

The etiology of cerebrovascular disease is heterogeneous, with the majority of strokes being of ischemic origin. Transient ischemic attack is now considered to be an important precursor and long-term risk factor for ischemic stroke. Given the lack of acute therapies for ischemic stroke, current

treatments focus on secondary prevention through risk-factor management, pharmacotherapy and interventional approaches. As illustrated in this paper, antiplatelet agents (e.g. clopidogrel, aspirin, dipyridamole) are the cornerstone of therapy for prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke.     

Neuroprotection and thrombolysis: combination therapy in acute ischaemic stroke

The administration of oral aspirin within 48 h and tissue plasminogen activator within 3 h of ischaemic stroke onset remain the only treatments that have been shown to have clinical benefit. There has been much excitement about neuroprotection over the last two decades, as it may minimise the harmful effects of ischaemic neuronal damage. Although each step along the ischaemic cascade offers a potential target for therapeutic intervention, and neuroprotection has shown benefit in animal studies, this has been difficult to translate to humans. Some hope has been offered by the recent finding that the free radical scavenger NXY-059 may improve outcomes in patients presenting within 6 h of onset of ischaemic stroke. There is logic to the idea that neuroprotection may be most effective when reperfusion has occurred with thrombolysis, as the neuroprotectant will have greater access to ischaemic tissue and the opportunity is presented to minimise free radical-mediated reperfusion injury. Numerous studies in animal models support this view, but the concept has not, as yet, been rigorously tested in humans.     

Neuroprotection and thrombolysis: combination therapy in acute ischaemic stroke

The administration of oral aspirin within 48 h and tissue plasminogen activator within 3 h of ischaemic stroke onset remain the only treatments that have been shown to have clinical benefit. There has been much excitement about neuroprotection over the last two decades, as it may minimise the harmful effects of ischaemic neuronal damage. Although each step along the ischaemic cascade offers a potential target for therapeutic intervention, and neuroprotection has shown benefit in animal studies, this has been difficult to translate to humans. Some hope has been offered by the recent finding that the free radical scavenger NXY-059 may improve outcomes in patients presenting within 6 h of onset of ischaemic stroke. There is logic to the idea that neuroprotection may be most effective when reperfusion has occurred with thrombolysis, as the neuroprotectant will have greater access to ischaemic tissue and the opportunity is presented to minimise free radical-mediated reperfusion injury. Numerous studies in animal models support this view, but the concept has not, as yet, been rigorously tested in humans.     

Optimal timing of thrombolytic therapy in acute ischaemic stroke

The clinical benefit of thrombolytic therapy for patients experiencing acute cerebral ischaemia has been demonstrated by both clinical trials and phase IV studies. However, such treatments must be initiated in a rapid manner, with treating physicians adhering to strict protocols designed to minimise delays and maximise safety. The efficacy of intravenous drug administration has been established with alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; tPA) and ancrod, but only if these drugs can be administered within 3 hours of symptom onset. The use of alteplase beyond this timeframe, or outside of established protocols, may be hazardous. The use of alternative intravenous thrombolytic agents, such as streptokinase, also appears hazardous. Intra-arterial delivery of thrombolytic drugs such as pro-urokinase may extend clinical benefit to the 6-hour time frame.     

The role of laboratory monitoring in antiplatelet therapy

In the last decade, several studies reported a high inter-individual variability in the pharmacological response to antiplatelet drugs. Suboptimal response to aspirin, as determined by specific tests (serum thromboxane B(2)), is rare and, when present, it appears to be caused by poor compliance in most instances. In contrast, studies that used specific tests to measure the pharmacological effect of clopidogrel showed a wide variability of response, with about 1/3 of treated subjects who are very poor responders. Inter-individual difference in the extent of metabolism of clopidogrel to its active metabolite by cytochrome P450 isoforms is the most relevant cause of the observed inter-individual variability in platelet inhibition. Tailored treatment based on laboratory monitoring of platelet function has been proposed as a solution to poor responsiveness to clopidogrel. However, we still need to identify the ideal laboratory test and to answer basic questions on its clinical utility and cost-effectiveness, before monitoring clopidogrel therapy can be recommended in clinical practice.     

Pharmacological revascularization of acute ischaemic stroke: focus on challenges and novel strategies

The only currently approved treatment for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) is alteplase, a thrombolytic agent given intravenously (IV) within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, in an attempt to reopen occluded intracerebral arteries. However, no more than 5% of all AIS patients receive IV alteplase, mainly because of too long symptom-onset-to-hospital intervals. Moreover, this strategy is effective for less than half of the patients treated within the therapeutic window. Early recanalization is the most powerful prognostic factor, and novel drugs or therapeutic strategies are primarily aimed at improving alteplase efficacy to rapidly and safely reopen the occluded arteries. Because IV alteplase-resistant thrombi are those with the largest clot burden, responsible for the most devastating brain-tissue infarctions, development of novel approved AIS therapies is an urgent priority. At present, in the absence of controlled trials, no valid recommendations can be made. However, the most promising emerging strategy is a combination of standard or low-dose IV alteplase with an intra-arterial (IA) procedure, including additional endovascular thrombolytic and/or mechanical clot retrieval. Notably, results of open trials using the IA route had relatively disappointing clinical outcomes, despite remarkable arterial recanalization rates. Controlled trials are urgently needed to evaluate strategies including an IA route. In addition, logistic and cost constraints will likely limit their routine use, even in industrialized countries. Combining of another IV drug and IV alteplase is a far less studied option, although much easier to implement. Add-on IV drugs could be an antiplatelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, a direct thrombin inhibitor or a second thrombolytic agent, e.g. tenecteplase. However, neuroimaging to measure the clot burden and infarction size will probably be necessary to predict IV alteplase failure and the subsequent use of these eventual additional therapies.     

A systematic review of vinpocetine therapy in acute ischaemic stroke

Objectives: To determine whether vinpocetine decreases short- and long-term case fatality and proportion of dependent survivors if administered within 2 weeks of stroke onset. Methods: All published and unpublished trials were attempted to be identified using the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Collaboration Stroke Review Group, using MEDLINE searches performed with all known manufacturer code names and trade names of vinpocetine and by contacting manufacturers of vinpocetine to give information of all randomised controlled trials on vinpocetine in stroke. Researchers who participated in trials on vinpocetine in Hungary were asked for further information. Only truly randomised, unconfounded clinical trials that compared the effect of vinpocetine to either placebo or another reference treatment for acute stroke where treatment started no later than 14 days after stroke onset were eligible for inclusion. Data synthesis and analysis was performed using the Cochrane Review Manager software (RevMan version 3.0). Results: Among the identified studies on vinpocetine in stroke, only one fulfilled the selection criteria for inclusion in the review. No death occurred in the study groups and no statistically significant difference was found in dependency between the treatment and the placebo groups. No adverse effects were reported. Conclusions: Based on only one small randomised controlled unconfounded study, presently there is not enough evidence to decide whether the administration of vinpocetine does or does not decrease case fatality and dependency in acute stroke. Received: 16 December 1998 / Accepted in revised form: 2 March 1999     

The role of antiplatelet therapy in the management of acute coronary syndromes

The benefit of aspirin use in the emergent care of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has been well-established. Recent studies have further demonstrated the importance of antiplatelet therapy in the acute setting, primarily with the use of intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors. Aspirin and the thienopyridines (ticlopidine and clopidogrel) are oral antiplatelet agents that interfere with platelet activation in complementary, but separate pathways. Combination therapy of aspirin with other antiplatelet agents has demonstrated a benefit for the management of ACS. This article reviews the pathophysiology of platelet activation in ACS, landmark trials regarding antiplatelet agents, and the current recommendations for the use of both intravenous and oral antiplatelet agents in the management of patients with ACS.     

The role of antiplatelet therapy in the management of acute coronary syndromes

The benefit of aspirin use in the emergent care of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has been well-established. Recent studies have further demonstrated the importance of antiplatelet therapy in the acute setting, primarily with the use of intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors. Aspirin and the thienopyridines (ticlopidine and clopidogrel) are oral antiplatelet agents that interfere with platelet activation in complementary, but separate pathways. Combination therapy of aspirin with other antiplatelet agents has demonstrated a benefit for the management of ACS. This article reviews the pathophysiology of platelet activation in ACS, landmark trials regarding antiplatelet agents, and the current recommendations for the use of both intravenous and oral antiplatelet agents in the management of patients with ACS.     

Clinical potential of intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute ischaemic stroke

Acute ischaemic stroke is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity around the world. An arterial occlusive lesion is found in the majority of patients with acute ischaemic stroke, and recanalisation has been shown to result in a better clinical outcome. The only widely approved recanalisation strategy is the use of intravenous alteplase (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator; tPA) within 3 hours of stroke onset. However, this therapy has limitations, and alternative or supplemental recanalisation strategies need to be considered in a large number of patients with acute ischaemic stroke. One such promising strategy is intra-arterial thrombolysis. This article reviews the pharmacology of the various drugs used for intra-arterial thrombolysis in the setting of acute ischaemic stroke and the results of the clinical trials that have studied their benefit. Three generations of thrombolytic agents have been available for clinical use so far. The first-generation agents such as streptokinase and urokinase were the first to be studied in acute stroke, and a number of positive case reports and series of their intra-arterial use have been reported from around the world. Second-generation products include alteplase and pro-urokinase. The clinical benefits of intra-arterial pro-urokinase were recently proven in a randomised, placebo-controlled study. Third-generation agents, such as reteplase, lanoteplase and tenecteplase, offer superior recanalisation rates with limited systemic adverse effects and might prove to be the agents of choice for intra-arterial acute stroke thrombolysis in the future. The exact administration regimens as well as the identification of patient sub-populations most likely to benefit from intra-arterial thrombolysis are subjects of current investigations, and hopefully firmer guidelines will be established in the next few years, once the results of the clinical trials are available.     

缺血性卒中抗血小板治疗的药学监护

目的探讨对缺血性卒中接受双联抗血小板治疗患者进行药学监护的方法。方法针对1例接受双联抗血小板治疗的缺血性脑卒中患者,结合相关文献,提出进行药学监护的重点。结果通过本次药学监护,对因阿司匹林抵抗而接受双联抗血小板治疗的老年患者用药方案有了新的认识,明确了药学监护的重点。结论双联抗血小板治疗较单药治疗不良反应较多,应通过科学的药学监护,提高用药安全性。     

Advances in antiplatelet therapy

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the western world. These disorders share a common pathophysiology -- atherosclerosis, which affects various arterial beds, leading to protean manifestations (coronary artery disease [CAD], stroke, peripheral arterial disease [PAD]). The platelet plays a pivotal role in the perpetuation and clinical expression of these disorders. The platelet, once believed to have a role confined to modulation of thrombosis and haemostasis, also plays an active role in vascular inflammation. Antiplatelet agents have become first-line therapy for CVD, and their unequivocal benefits are demonstrated in various basic and experimental models and supported by overwhelming evidence from clinical trials. Search is underway for more effective and safer antiplatelet therapy. Novel therapies are emerging to target the redundant pathways of platelet adhesion, activation and aggregation. Efforts are also ongoing to enhance implementation of existent therapy, target therapy selectively to high-risk patients and to those likely to respond (pharmacogenomics), and study the incremental benefits and safety of various antiplatelet combinations and their interaction with other medications in patients with CVD treated with polypharmacy.